首页 > 最新文献

Philosophical Perspectives最新文献

英文 中文
Issue Information 问题信息
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12108
{"title":"Issue Information","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/phpe.12108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47944904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IMMORALITY AND IRRATIONALITY 不道德和非理性
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12132
Alex Worsnip
{"title":"IMMORALITY AND IRRATIONALITY","authors":"Alex Worsnip","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12132","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/phpe.12132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63604972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DEFLATIONISM AND THE FUNCTION OF TRUTH 通货紧缩与真理的作用
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/PHPE.12113
L. Picollo, T. Schindler
{"title":"DEFLATIONISM AND THE FUNCTION OF TRUTH","authors":"L. Picollo, T. Schindler","doi":"10.1111/PHPE.12113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PHPE.12113","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PHPE.12113","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46414745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
SEMANTIC INDECISION 语义优柔寡断
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12110
Michael Caie
{"title":"SEMANTIC INDECISION","authors":"Michael Caie","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/phpe.12110","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41619323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
De Se Pragmatics 德塞语用学
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/PHPE.12115
Andy Egan
{"title":"De Se\u0000 Pragmatics","authors":"Andy Egan","doi":"10.1111/PHPE.12115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PHPE.12115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PHPE.12115","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46921790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
What is Super Semantics? * 什么是超级语义?*
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12122
P. Schlenker
Formal semantics was born from an attempt to state explicit rules to predict the truth conditions of natural language sentences. But this goal can be extended beyond language stricto sensu, to a variety of representational systems in nature. This was part of the program of semiotics (e.g. Morris 1938), construed as a general theory of signs; but it never got integrated to the research program of formal semantics. We argue for such an integration, on two general grounds. First, the class of objects that interact with or display uncontroversially linguistic properties is larger than was initially thought. Spoken and especially sign language make use of rich iconic resources which interact with logical structure but cannot be captured without a 'formal semantics with iconicity'. In addition, recent comparisons between sign, speech and gestures strongly suggest that language is multi-modal and that gestures are full citizens of the linguistic world: they trigger familiar inferential types (presuppositions or supplements) when they co-occur with or follow words; and when they fully replace words, their informational content gets divided among familiar slots of the inferential typology, and they even follow a 'gestural grammar' that is in part reminiscent of sign language grammar. Second, independently from these language-internal motivations, the proposed extension leads to a far broader typology of meaning operations in nature, one that includes animal meanings, pictorial meanings, musical meanings, and more. This makes it possible to explore new connections among these domains, for instance between vocal and gestural iconicity, between musical inferences and animal signals, or between visual narratives and music.
形式语义学诞生于试图陈述明确规则来预测自然语言句子的真实性条件。但这一目标可以超越狭义的语言,扩展到自然界中的各种表征系统。这是符号学程序的一部分(例如Morris 1938),被解释为符号的一般理论;但它从未被整合到形式语义学的研究程序中。我们主张这样一种一体化,理由有两个。首先,与语言特性相互作用或显示出无争议语言特性的对象类别比最初想象的要大。口语,尤其是手语,利用了丰富的标志性资源,这些资源与逻辑结构相互作用,但如果没有“具有象似性的形式语义”,就无法捕获。此外,最近对手势、言语和手势的比较有力地表明,语言是多模态的,手势是语言世界的完全公民:当它们与单词共同出现或跟随单词时,它们会触发熟悉的推理类型(前提或补充);当它们完全取代单词时,它们的信息内容会被划分在推理类型学中熟悉的位置,它们甚至遵循“手势语法”,这在一定程度上让人想起手语语法。其次,独立于这些语言内部动机,所提出的扩展导致了自然界意义操作的更广泛的类型学,包括动物意义、图像意义、音乐意义等等。这使得探索这些领域之间的新联系成为可能,例如声音和手势象似性之间,音乐推理和动物信号之间,或者视觉叙事和音乐之间。
{"title":"What is Super Semantics?\u0000 *","authors":"P. Schlenker","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12122","url":null,"abstract":"Formal semantics was born from an attempt to state explicit rules to predict the truth conditions of natural language sentences. But this goal can be extended beyond language stricto sensu, to a variety of representational systems in nature. This was part of the program of semiotics (e.g. Morris 1938), construed as a general theory of signs; but it never got integrated to the research program of formal semantics. We argue for such an integration, on two general grounds. First, the class of objects that interact with or display uncontroversially linguistic properties is larger than was initially thought. Spoken and especially sign language make use of rich iconic resources which interact with logical structure but cannot be captured without a 'formal semantics with iconicity'. In addition, recent comparisons between sign, speech and gestures strongly suggest that language is multi-modal and that gestures are full citizens of the linguistic world: they trigger familiar inferential types (presuppositions or supplements) when they co-occur with or follow words; and when they fully replace words, their informational content gets divided among familiar slots of the inferential typology, and they even follow a 'gestural grammar' that is in part reminiscent of sign language grammar. Second, independently from these language-internal motivations, the proposed extension leads to a far broader typology of meaning operations in nature, one that includes animal meanings, pictorial meanings, musical meanings, and more. This makes it possible to explore new connections among these domains, for instance between vocal and gestural iconicity, between musical inferences and animal signals, or between visual narratives and music.","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/phpe.12122","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48102609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Meaning Transfer Revisited 重新审视意义传递
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/PHPE.12120
David Liebesman, Ofra Magidor
{"title":"Meaning Transfer Revisited","authors":"David Liebesman, Ofra Magidor","doi":"10.1111/PHPE.12120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PHPE.12120","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PHPE.12120","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46587608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
TALKING ABOUT WORLDS* 谈论世界*
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/PHPE.12112
M. Mandelkern
I explore the logic of the conditional, using credence judgments to argue against Duality and in favor of Conditional Excluded Middle . I then explore how to give a theory of the conditional which validates the latter and not the former, developing a variant on Kratzer (1981)’s restrictor theory, as well as a proposal which combines Stalnaker (1968)’s theory of the conditional with the theory of epistemic modals I develop in Mandelkern 2019a. I argue that the latter approach fits naturally with a conception of conditionals as referential devices which allow us to talk about particular worlds.
我探索了条件的逻辑,用信任判断来反对二元性,支持条件排除中间。然后,我探索如何给出一个条件理论来验证后者,而不是前者,在Kratzer(1981)的限制器理论的基础上发展了一个变体,以及将Stalnaker(1968)的条件理论与我在Mandelkern 2019a中发展的认识模态理论相结合的建议。我认为后一种方法自然地将条件句视为指称手段,使我们能够谈论特定的世界。
{"title":"TALKING ABOUT WORLDS*","authors":"M. Mandelkern","doi":"10.1111/PHPE.12112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PHPE.12112","url":null,"abstract":"I explore the logic of the conditional, using credence judgments to argue against Duality and in favor of Conditional Excluded Middle . I then explore how to give a theory of the conditional which validates the latter and not the former, developing a variant on Kratzer (1981)’s restrictor theory, as well as a proposal which combines Stalnaker (1968)’s theory of the conditional with the theory of epistemic modals I develop in Mandelkern 2019a. I argue that the latter approach fits naturally with a conception of conditionals as referential devices which allow us to talk about particular worlds.","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PHPE.12112","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47157207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Pragmatic Structures for Action‐Directed Pragmatics 行动导向语用学的语用结构
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12119
I. Kvart
{"title":"Pragmatic Structures for Action‐Directed Pragmatics","authors":"I. Kvart","doi":"10.1111/phpe.12119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12119","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/phpe.12119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43436012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
RADICAL ANTI‐DISQUOTATIONALISM 激进的反DISQUOTATIONALISM应承担的
IF 2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/PHPE.12109
A. Bacon
A number of ‘no-proposition’ approaches to the liar paradox find themselves implicitly committed to a moderate disquotational principle: the principle that if an utterance of the sentence ‘P ’ says anything at all, it says that P (with suitable restrictions). I show that this principle alone is responsible for the revenge paradoxes that plague this view. I instead propose a view in which there are several closely related language-world relations playing the ‘semantic expressing’ role, none of which is more central to semantic theorizing than any other. I use this thesis about language and the negative result about disquotation to motivate the view that people do say things with utterances of paradoxical sentences, although they do not say the proposition you’d always expect, as articulated with a disquotational principle. Consider a self-referential utterance, u, of the sentence ‘u is not true’. According to one widespread and appealing intuition when one makes a semantically paradoxical utterance such as u one simply does not succeed in saying anything. Call this the no proposition theory. No proposition theorists reject the disquotational assumption that utterances of ‘u is not true’ say that u is not true on the grounds that some utterances of ‘u is not true’ do not say anything at all. However, they may nonetheless subscribe to a qualified version of the principle that says that if an utterance of ‘u is not true’ says anything at all it says that u is not true. In this paper I shall show that such views are susceptible to a version of the revenge paradoxes. An examination of these paradoxes suggests a view in which paradoxical utterances such as u do say things, although they do not say what you might expect them to (in this case, that u is not true). I shall show, moreover, that this phenomena falls out of general considerations about the relation between language and the world, and is much more widespread than many have thought. In this paper we will be primarily be investigating the corner of philosophical space that accepts classical logic and that admits quantifiers that bind variables taking sentence position. Unless otherwise stated, that framework will be assumed throughout. 1 No Proposition Accounts of the Paradoxes The most straightforward version of the no proposition theory maintains that sentences like ‘u is not true’ are completely meaningless, and thus that any attempt to say something by making an utterance of this sentence would fail. Call this the non-contextual view. On the non-contextual view, then, all utterances of a paradoxical sentence are equally bad. ∗Thanks to ... 1Restrictions might exclude sentences which express different propositions in different contexts, such as sentences involving indexical expressions. 2Of course, neither of these assumptions are uncontentious; but see Prior [19] and Williamson [28] for a defense of the intelligibility of quantification into sentence position, and Williamson [29] for general
许多研究说谎者悖论的“无命题”方法发现自己隐含地遵循了一个适度的非引语原则:如果一个句子“P”的话语说了什么,它就说了P(在适当的限制下)。我指出,这一原则本身就是困扰这种观点的复仇悖论的原因。相反,我提出了一种观点,认为有几个密切相关的语言世界关系扮演着“语义表达”的角色,其中没有一个比其他任何一个对语义理论化更重要。我用这篇关于语言和反引的负面结果的论文来激发这样一种观点,即人们确实用矛盾句子的话语来表达事物,尽管他们说的不是你一直期望的命题,正如反引原则所表达的那样。考虑一句“u is not true”的自我指涉话语u。根据一种普遍而吸引人的直觉,当一个人说出像“u”这样语义矛盾的话语时,他根本说不出什么来。称之为无命题理论。没有命题理论家会拒绝不引用的假设,即" u不为真"的表述也就是说u不为真,因为一些" u不为真"的表述根本什么也没说。然而,他们可能仍然赞同这个原则的一个限定版本,即如果一个“u不为真”的话语说了什么,它就说明u不为真。在本文中,我将表明,这种观点容易受到复仇悖论的影响。对这些悖论的研究表明,一种观点认为,像u这样的悖论性话语确实说了一些事情,尽管它们并没有说出你可能期望它们说的话(在这种情况下,u不是真的)。此外,我将说明,这种现象不属于对语言与世界之间关系的一般考虑,而且比许多人想象的要广泛得多。在本文中,我们将主要研究哲学空间的角落,它接受经典逻辑,并承认量词绑定变量的句子位置。除非另有说明,否则将自始至终假定该框架。无命题论的最直接的版本认为,像" u不为真"这样的句子是完全没有意义的,因此,任何试图通过说出这个句子来表达某事的尝试都会失败。我们称之为非上下文视图。从非语境的观点来看,一个悖论句的所有话语都是同样糟糕的。由于……限制可能会排除在不同上下文中表达不同命题的句子,例如涉及索引表达式的句子。当然,这两种假设都不是毫无争议的;但请参阅Prior b[19]和Williamson[28]对句子位置的量化可解性的辩护,以及Williamson[29]对经典逻辑应用于说者悖论的一般方法论评论。关于放松经典命题逻辑的说谎者的最新方法,参见Field[8]。关于放松经典命题量词规则的方法的讨论,见Bacon, Hawthorne和Uzquiano b[2]。
{"title":"RADICAL ANTI‐DISQUOTATIONALISM","authors":"A. Bacon","doi":"10.1111/PHPE.12109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PHPE.12109","url":null,"abstract":"A number of ‘no-proposition’ approaches to the liar paradox find themselves implicitly committed to a moderate disquotational principle: the principle that if an utterance of the sentence ‘P ’ says anything at all, it says that P (with suitable restrictions). I show that this principle alone is responsible for the revenge paradoxes that plague this view. I instead propose a view in which there are several closely related language-world relations playing the ‘semantic expressing’ role, none of which is more central to semantic theorizing than any other. I use this thesis about language and the negative result about disquotation to motivate the view that people do say things with utterances of paradoxical sentences, although they do not say the proposition you’d always expect, as articulated with a disquotational principle. Consider a self-referential utterance, u, of the sentence ‘u is not true’. According to one widespread and appealing intuition when one makes a semantically paradoxical utterance such as u one simply does not succeed in saying anything. Call this the no proposition theory. No proposition theorists reject the disquotational assumption that utterances of ‘u is not true’ say that u is not true on the grounds that some utterances of ‘u is not true’ do not say anything at all. However, they may nonetheless subscribe to a qualified version of the principle that says that if an utterance of ‘u is not true’ says anything at all it says that u is not true. In this paper I shall show that such views are susceptible to a version of the revenge paradoxes. An examination of these paradoxes suggests a view in which paradoxical utterances such as u do say things, although they do not say what you might expect them to (in this case, that u is not true). I shall show, moreover, that this phenomena falls out of general considerations about the relation between language and the world, and is much more widespread than many have thought. In this paper we will be primarily be investigating the corner of philosophical space that accepts classical logic and that admits quantifiers that bind variables taking sentence position. Unless otherwise stated, that framework will be assumed throughout. 1 No Proposition Accounts of the Paradoxes The most straightforward version of the no proposition theory maintains that sentences like ‘u is not true’ are completely meaningless, and thus that any attempt to say something by making an utterance of this sentence would fail. Call this the non-contextual view. On the non-contextual view, then, all utterances of a paradoxical sentence are equally bad. ∗Thanks to ... 1Restrictions might exclude sentences which express different propositions in different contexts, such as sentences involving indexical expressions. 2Of course, neither of these assumptions are uncontentious; but see Prior [19] and Williamson [28] for a defense of the intelligibility of quantification into sentence position, and Williamson [29] for general","PeriodicalId":51519,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PHPE.12109","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48676867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Philosophical Perspectives
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1