Chinese Journal of Traumatology最新文献

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left and right lower extremities was treated in the same way, but the left and right extremities received different levels of attention. This study aimed to investigate the differences between the right and left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT).

Methods: Clinical characteristics of LEDVT patients from July 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed to compare the incidence of LEDVT on different limbs, demographics, predisposing factors, and anatomical characteristics. The exclusion criteria were bilateral LEDVT and recurrent thrombosis. Measured data was analyzed using independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Count data were analyzed by Chi-square test. A p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

Results: There were 478 patients included in this study and the ratio of patients with LEDVT on the left and right limbs was 3.16:1 (363:115). LEDVT of the left limb was predominantly female, and the age was usually > 50 years (50 - 60 years: 16.80%; > 60 years: 57.30%). The primary predisposing factor was iliac vein compression syndrome, with iliofemoral thrombosis being the main type. Male patients with LEDVT on the right limb were predominant and the age of onset was usually ≤ 60 years (52.17%). The main predisposing factor was recent surgery or trauma (< 30 days) and femoropopliteal thrombosis was the main type. In more detail, the left iliac vein was compressed mainly in the proximal segment, and the right iliac vein was compressed mainly in the intermediate and distal segments. Recent surgery or trauma to the locomotor system and genitourinary system often induced LEDVT.

Conclusion: The incidence of LEDVT on the left is significantly higher than that on the right. LEDVT on different sides has different characteristics, which is crucial for prevention and diagnosis in the relevant population so there are also differences in treatment of the affected limbs.

Endoscopic techniques have been widely used in orthopedic surgery, such as arthroscopy and transforaminal endoscopy, but the application in fracture is rarely reported. We reported a case of a 69-year-old male with pelvic fracture (AO/OTA type B2.1) who underwent successful laparoscopy-assisted pubic ramus plate fixation without auxiliary incision. We designed and applied a separate custom-made lengthening surgical instrument for internal fixation installation suitable for laparoscopic surgery, and the entire reduction and internal fixation installation were performed under laparoscopy. The patient could sit up 1 day after surgery, and the reported pain visual analogue scale score decreased from 5 points before surgery to 1 point. At 2 weeks after surgery, the patient could walk with a single crutch. At 4 weeks after surgery, the Majeed score was 73 points, and at 10 weeks after surgery, the Majeed score increased to 81 points. Twelve weeks after surgery, the patient was able to walk independently without pain, defecation and urination function, and the Majeed score was 87. Laparoscopic surgery is a new strategy for treating pelvic ring fractures. The case proves that full laparoscopic-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation of pelvic fractures is feasible.

Purpose: Femur fractures are among the most common fractures treated surgically, representing a significant challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) represent a rare complication of the surgical treatment. It is necessary to pay attention during osteosynthesis, evaluating not only the fracture site but the entire femoral skeletal structure, the characteristics of the fracture, the health comorbidities, and the risk of malunion and pseudarthrosis. There are few studies on the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of PIFFs near osteosynthesis. This study aimed to investigate PIFF after osteosynthesis of femoral fractures and evaluate the mortality after surgery and the morbidity associated with these types of fractures.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at the IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy, between January, 2017 and December, 2022. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a femur fracture around an intramedullary nail to treat a previous fracture, follow-up ≥ 12 months, and patient age ≥ 65 years. Exclusion criterion was intraoperative periprosthetic fractures. The data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and range.

Results: Overall, 25 patients were enrolled (88.0% female) and the mean age was 84.5 years (range of 70 - 92 years). There were 20 patients having type B PIFF and 5 having type C. In 22 patients, multiple comorbidities were found with an average Charlson comorbidity score of 5.5 and the mean time to peri-implant fracture was 38 months. After surgery, 1 patient (4.0%) presented renal failure, 1 (4.0%) needed removal surgery for their loosening, and 2 (8.0%) presented surgical site infection. Nine patients (36.0%) died within 1 year with a mortality rate of 20. 0% at 30 days, 8.0% at 3 months, and 8.0% at 12 months.

Conclusions: PIFFs in elderly patients are associated with high short-term mortality and morbidity, so careful planning for primary fracture surgery and patient awareness to ensure prolonged compliance and a healthy lifestyle are essential for prevention.

Purpose: The management of irreducible, sagittally unstable peritrochanteric fractures presents a significant challenge due to the inability to achieve closed reduction using conventional techniques. This study introduces a novel minimally invasive technique leveraging the mechanical advantage principle with long, angled hemostatic clamps.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 16 patients who sustained sagittally unstable peritrochanteric fractures and underwent a percutaneous hemostatic clamp leverage reduction procedure.

Inclusion criteria: (1) Preoperative confirmation of fracture type as peritrochanteric fracture; (2) Intraoperative imaging confirms the presence of sagittal plane displacement at the fracture site; (3) Age > 18 years.

Exclusion criteria: (1) Open fractures, pathological fractures, and diabetes; (2) Long-term use of corticosteroids; (3) Patients with local skin or systemic conditions not suitable for surgery. Regular follow-ups at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks continued until evidence of bone consolidation was apparent in radiographic assessments. Evaluation of the alignment quality considered factors such as the re-establishment of the neck-shaft angle, the integrity of all cortical bone edges, and the rectification of any translational displacement, while the assessment of hip functionality was performed using the Harris scoring system. Statistical analysis of the relevant data was performed using SPSS 25.0 software.

Results: The average age of these 16 patients was 56.8 years (ranging from 25 to 81 years), consisting of 8 males and 8 females. According to the AO/OTA fracture classification, the cohort included 13 cases of type 31A, 2 cases of type 32A, and 1 case of type 32C. The time from hospital admission to the day of surgery ranged from 3 to 11 days, with an average of 5.1 days. Closed reduction was successfully implemented in all 10 instances, negating the necessity for transition to open reduction procedures. The mean operative duration was 105.8 min (range 80 - 180 min). Satisfactory results of the quality of reduction were determined by comparison with the normal side. The average Harris hip score was 94.1 (range 87 - 99), and the fracture healing time was 4.2 months (3 - 6 months). Implant failure and malunion were not observed.

Conclusions: This study provides an alternative, minimally invasive technique for reducing sagittally unstable, irreducible peritrochanteric fractures. This technique holds the potential to manage complex fractures with the same efficacy as is typically reserved for simple and easily reducible fractures.

Purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue that impacts individuals all over the world and is one of the main causes of mortality and morbidity. Decompressive craniectomy is the usual course of treatment. Basal cisternostomy has been shown to be highly effective as an alternative procedure to decompressive craniectomy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort of patients who received surgery for severe TBI between January 2019 and March 2023. Inclusion criterias were patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years who met the diagnostic criteria for severe TBI at first presentation and who underwent surgical intervention. The exclusion criteria were patients who have severe multiple injuries at the time of admission; preoperative intracranial pressure > 60 mmHg; cognitive impairment before the onset of the disease; hematologic disorders; or impaired functioning of the heart, liver, kidneys, or other visceral organs. Depending on the surgical approach, the patients were categorized into decompressive craniectomy group as well as basal cisternostomy group. General data and postoperative indicators, including Glasgow coma scale, intracranial pressure, etc., were recorded for both groups of patients. Among them, the Glasgow outcome scale extended assessment at 6 months served as the primary outcome. After that, the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software.

Results: The trial enrolled 41 patients (32 men and 9 women) who met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 25 patients received decompressive decompressive craniectomy, and 16 patients received basal cisternostomy. Three days postoperative intracranial pressure levels were 10.07 ± 2.94 mmHg and 17.15 ± 14.65 mmHg (p = 0.013), respectively. The 6 months following discharge Glasgow outcome scale extended of patients was 4.73 ± 2.28 and 3.14 ± 2.15 (p = 0.027), respectively.

Conclusion: Our study reveals that basal cisternostomy in patients with surgically treated severe TBI has demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure as well as patient prognosis follow-up and avoids removal of the bone flap. The efficacy of cisternostomy has to be studied in larger, multi-clinical center randomized trials.