首页 > 最新文献

The American Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Clinically Relevant Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Do Patients’ Expectations Evolve Over Long-term Follow-up? Response 患者报告结果的临床相关阈值:患者的期望是否会随着长期随访而变化?响应
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251407254
Elizabeth G. Walsh, Benjamin G. Domb
{"title":"Clinically Relevant Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Do Patients’ Expectations Evolve Over Long-term Follow-up? Response","authors":"Elizabeth G. Walsh, Benjamin G. Domb","doi":"10.1177/03635465251407254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251407254","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Revision Versus Primary Repair of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injury: Response 腘绳肌腱近端撕脱伤翻修与初次修复的结果:反应
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251407257
Nicolas Lefèvre, Mohamad K. Moussa, Antoine Orso, Eugénie Valentin, Yoann Bohu, Antoine Gerometta, Frederic Khiami, Olivier Grimaud, Alain Meyer, Alexandre Hardy
{"title":"Outcomes of Revision Versus Primary Repair of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injury: Response","authors":"Nicolas Lefèvre, Mohamad K. Moussa, Antoine Orso, Eugénie Valentin, Yoann Bohu, Antoine Gerometta, Frederic Khiami, Olivier Grimaud, Alain Meyer, Alexandre Hardy","doi":"10.1177/03635465251407257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251407257","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Addition of Remplissage to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Effect on Recurrent Instability in Shoulders With Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Response 在关节镜下Bankart修复中加入remplage及其对肱骨严重丢失的肩部复发性不稳定的影响:反应
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251401229
Fritz Steuer, Ting Cong, Albert Lin
{"title":"The Addition of Remplissage to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Effect on Recurrent Instability in Shoulders With Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Response","authors":"Fritz Steuer, Ting Cong, Albert Lin","doi":"10.1177/03635465251401229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251401229","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cartilage Restoration: We Have Made Progress, Yet So Much Remains Unanswered 软骨修复:我们已经取得了进展,但还有很多问题没有得到解答
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465261417180
Adam B. Yanke
{"title":"Cartilage Restoration: We Have Made Progress, Yet So Much Remains Unanswered","authors":"Adam B. Yanke","doi":"10.1177/03635465261417180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465261417180","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"285 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinically Relevant Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Do Patients’ Expectations Evolve Over Long-term Follow-up? Letter to the Editor 患者报告结果的临床相关阈值:患者的期望是否会随着长期随访而变化?给编辑的信
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251407256
Periklis Giannakis, Zachary A. Trotzky, Olivia M. Jochl, Jashvant Poeran
{"title":"Clinically Relevant Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Do Patients’ Expectations Evolve Over Long-term Follow-up? Letter to the Editor","authors":"Periklis Giannakis, Zachary A. Trotzky, Olivia M. Jochl, Jashvant Poeran","doi":"10.1177/03635465251407256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251407256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meniscal Translation Under Loaded Motion After Posterior Horn Medial Meniscal Root Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation. 后角内侧半月板根修复后负重运动下的半月板平移:尸体生物力学评估。
Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251405733
Clayton W Nuelle,Garrett R Jackson,Will Bezold,Benjamin L Smith,James L Cook
BACKGROUNDBiomechanical evidence for adjustable posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) fixation has shown promising results for meniscal root repair. Adjustable suture anchor (ASA) fixation has yet to be evaluated through the loaded knee range of motion.HYPOTHESISThe ASA PMMR repair would restore meniscal translation similar to the native meniscus and maintain those parameters through the knee flexion arc during cyclical axial loading.STUDY DESIGNControlled laboratory study.METHODSEight cadaveric knees from 6 donors (4 men, 2 women; mean age, 44.9 years) were tested. Each knee was tested for meniscal translation in 3 conditions: intact, posterior root released, and root repair. The repairs were fixed with an ASA device in a Mason-Allen configuration with knotless repair sutures. In each condition, the knees were axially loaded with 30 N through a range of motion to test meniscal excursion, extrusion, and hoop strain at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 100° of flexion for 10 cycles. Each parameter was compared for statistical significance using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc tests.RESULTSExtrusion was significantly elevated in the PMMR released group compared with the native and repaired conditions at full extension (P = .0008), 30° (P = .007), 60° (P = .0008), 90° (P = .00006), and 100° (P = .0005). Extrusion in the ASA repaired condition was similar to, or less than, the native condition across every position. Meniscal hoop strain in the repaired and intact groups was significantly increased compared with the released group (P = .0009). Meniscal excursion was significantly greater with root release compared with intact and repaired groups at 30° (P = .001), but less in the native condition at 60° (P = .021) and 100° (P = .018).CONCLUSIONPMMR ASA repair resulted in decreased excursion and extrusion compared with the meniscal root tear condition, extrusion, and hoop strain approximated that of native, intact meniscus through axial loading and knee range of motion in a human cadaveric model.CLINICAL RELEVANCEASA PMMR demonstrated meniscal translation similar to that of the native meniscus under loading during knee motion, which could potentially enable more accelerated postsurgical rehabilitation. Future studies may define the clinical significance of healing rates and long-term outcomes.
生物力学证据表明,可调节后内侧半月板根(PMMR)固定在半月板根修复中具有良好的效果。可调节缝线锚定(ASA)固定尚未通过负荷膝关节活动范围进行评估。假设ASA PMMR修复将恢复半月板平移类似于天然半月板,并在周期性轴向负荷期间通过膝关节屈曲弧维持这些参数。研究设计:对照实验室研究。方法对6例供体(男4例,女2例,平均年龄44.9岁)8例尸体膝关节进行检测。在3种情况下测试每个膝关节的半月板平移:完整,后根释放和根修复。修复用ASA装置在Mason-Allen配置下固定,无结修复缝线。在每种情况下,膝关节通过一系列运动向轴向加载30 N,以测试在0°,30°,60°,90°和100°屈曲下的半月板偏移,挤压和环向应变,持续10个周期。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)或单因素方差分析(1-way ANOVA)比较各参数的统计学显著性,然后进行Tukey事后检验。结果PMMR松解组在完全伸展(P = .0008)、30°(P = .007)、60°(P = .0008)、90°(P = .00006)和100°(P = .0005)时,与正常和修复组相比,挤压明显升高。ASA修复状态下的挤压与每个位置的原始状态相似或小于原始状态。修复组和完整组的半月板环应变较松解组明显增加(P = 0.0009)。与完整和修复组相比,在30°时,半月板松动明显大于根释放组(P = 0.001),但在60°和100°时,半月板偏移较少(P = 0.021)。结论:与半月板根撕裂情况相比,pmmr ASA修复减少了半月板根的偏移和挤压,通过轴向载荷和膝关节运动范围,在人体模型中,挤压和环向应变接近天然完整半月板。easa PMMR显示,在膝关节运动过程中,半月板在负荷下的平移与原始半月板相似,这可能会加速术后康复。未来的研究可能会确定治愈率和长期预后的临床意义。
{"title":"Meniscal Translation Under Loaded Motion After Posterior Horn Medial Meniscal Root Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Evaluation.","authors":"Clayton W Nuelle,Garrett R Jackson,Will Bezold,Benjamin L Smith,James L Cook","doi":"10.1177/03635465251405733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251405733","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDBiomechanical evidence for adjustable posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) fixation has shown promising results for meniscal root repair. Adjustable suture anchor (ASA) fixation has yet to be evaluated through the loaded knee range of motion.HYPOTHESISThe ASA PMMR repair would restore meniscal translation similar to the native meniscus and maintain those parameters through the knee flexion arc during cyclical axial loading.STUDY DESIGNControlled laboratory study.METHODSEight cadaveric knees from 6 donors (4 men, 2 women; mean age, 44.9 years) were tested. Each knee was tested for meniscal translation in 3 conditions: intact, posterior root released, and root repair. The repairs were fixed with an ASA device in a Mason-Allen configuration with knotless repair sutures. In each condition, the knees were axially loaded with 30 N through a range of motion to test meniscal excursion, extrusion, and hoop strain at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 100° of flexion for 10 cycles. Each parameter was compared for statistical significance using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc tests.RESULTSExtrusion was significantly elevated in the PMMR released group compared with the native and repaired conditions at full extension (P = .0008), 30° (P = .007), 60° (P = .0008), 90° (P = .00006), and 100° (P = .0005). Extrusion in the ASA repaired condition was similar to, or less than, the native condition across every position. Meniscal hoop strain in the repaired and intact groups was significantly increased compared with the released group (P = .0009). Meniscal excursion was significantly greater with root release compared with intact and repaired groups at 30° (P = .001), but less in the native condition at 60° (P = .021) and 100° (P = .018).CONCLUSIONPMMR ASA repair resulted in decreased excursion and extrusion compared with the meniscal root tear condition, extrusion, and hoop strain approximated that of native, intact meniscus through axial loading and knee range of motion in a human cadaveric model.CLINICAL RELEVANCEASA PMMR demonstrated meniscal translation similar to that of the native meniscus under loading during knee motion, which could potentially enable more accelerated postsurgical rehabilitation. Future studies may define the clinical significance of healing rates and long-term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"3635465251405733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146072982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Return to Sports After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study of 1782 Patients. 原发性全膝关节置换术后恢复运动:1782例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251400357
Rui W Soares,Ignacio Pasqualini,Khaled A Elmenawi,Shujaa T Khan,Turan Oguz,Cole R Johnson,Matthew E Deren,Michael J Scarcella,Nicolas S Piuzzi
BACKGROUNDTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides pain relief and functional improvement for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients. As TKA use increases in younger patients, return to sports (RTS) has become a key outcome measure. While RTS rates after TKA are generally high, they vary significantly across studies due to differences in study design, patient populations, and RTS definitions.PURPOSETo determine RTS rates, evaluate return to preoperative sport levels, quantify time to RTS, and identify factors affecting RTS after TKA.STUDY DESIGNCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.METHODSWe analyzed 21,466 primary TKAs performed between 2016 and 2022. Of these, 1782 patients (8.3%) were athletes at baseline, with 1464 (82.2%) completing 1-year follow-up. We recorded demographic characteristics, comorbidities, baseline and 1-year RTS status, time to RTS, athlete type, and patient-reported outcomes. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Cox regression for time to RTS, and logistic regression for RTS-associated factors.RESULTSOf 1464 patients, 782 (53.4%) achieved RTS, while 676 (46.6%) did not; both contact and noncontact sports were included. Among those who returned, 62% resumed their previous sport at the same level, 34.5% at a reduced intensity, and 3.4% switched to a different sport. The median RTS time was 12 weeks, with 90% returning within 27 weeks. Medicaid patients had a delayed RTS compared with those with commercial insurance (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51). Overweight patients returned sooner than normal-weight patients (HR, 1.41). Female patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.76) and Black patients (OR, 2.34) had lower RTS odds, while recreational (OR, 0.06) and competitive athletes (OR, 0.10) had higher RTS odds versus those not participating in athletic activities.CONCLUSIONOver half of athletes returned to sports within 1 year of TKA, most within 27 weeks. RTS rates varied by preoperative competitive level, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidity burden. These findings can guide patient expectations and shared decision-making regarding post-TKA sports participation. Future research should focus on improving RTS rates in high-risk groups, standardizing RTS criteria, and stratifying outcomes by sport type and impact level to enable more individualized patient recommendations.
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)为终末期膝关节骨关节炎患者提供疼痛缓解和功能改善。随着TKA在年轻患者中的使用增加,重返运动(RTS)已成为一项关键的结果衡量指标。虽然TKA后的RTS率通常很高,但由于研究设计、患者群体和RTS定义的差异,不同研究的RTS率差异很大。目的确定RTS率,评估术前运动恢复水平,量化RTS时间,并确定TKA后影响RTS的因素。研究设计:队列研究;证据等级2。方法对2016年至2022年期间进行的21466例原发性tka进行分析。其中,1782例患者(8.3%)在基线时是运动员,1464例(82.2%)完成了1年的随访。我们记录了人口统计学特征、合并症、基线和1年RTS状态、进行RTS的时间、运动员类型和患者报告的结果。分析包括描述性统计、RTS时间的Cox回归和RTS相关因素的logistic回归。结果1464例患者中,782例(53.4%)达到RTS, 676例(46.6%)未达到RTS;包括接触和非接触运动。在回来的人中,62%的人恢复了以前的运动水平,34.5%的人减少了强度,3.4%的人转向了不同的运动。中位RTS时间为12周,其中90%在27周内恢复。与商业保险患者相比,医疗补助患者的RTS延迟(风险比[HR], 0.51)。超重患者比正常体重患者更早返回(HR, 1.41)。女性患者(比值比[OR], 0.76)和黑人患者(比值比[OR], 2.34)的RTS赔率较低,而休闲(OR, 0.06)和竞技运动员(OR, 0.10)的RTS赔率高于不参加体育活动的患者。结论半数以上的运动员在TKA后1年内恢复运动,大部分在27周内。RTS率因术前竞技水平、性别、种族、体重指数和合并症负担而异。这些发现可以指导患者对tka后体育参与的期望和共同决策。未来的研究应侧重于提高高危人群的RTS率,标准化RTS标准,并根据运动类型和影响水平对结果进行分层,以实现更个性化的患者建议。
{"title":"Return to Sports After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study of 1782 Patients.","authors":"Rui W Soares,Ignacio Pasqualini,Khaled A Elmenawi,Shujaa T Khan,Turan Oguz,Cole R Johnson,Matthew E Deren,Michael J Scarcella,Nicolas S Piuzzi","doi":"10.1177/03635465251400357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251400357","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides pain relief and functional improvement for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients. As TKA use increases in younger patients, return to sports (RTS) has become a key outcome measure. While RTS rates after TKA are generally high, they vary significantly across studies due to differences in study design, patient populations, and RTS definitions.PURPOSETo determine RTS rates, evaluate return to preoperative sport levels, quantify time to RTS, and identify factors affecting RTS after TKA.STUDY DESIGNCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.METHODSWe analyzed 21,466 primary TKAs performed between 2016 and 2022. Of these, 1782 patients (8.3%) were athletes at baseline, with 1464 (82.2%) completing 1-year follow-up. We recorded demographic characteristics, comorbidities, baseline and 1-year RTS status, time to RTS, athlete type, and patient-reported outcomes. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Cox regression for time to RTS, and logistic regression for RTS-associated factors.RESULTSOf 1464 patients, 782 (53.4%) achieved RTS, while 676 (46.6%) did not; both contact and noncontact sports were included. Among those who returned, 62% resumed their previous sport at the same level, 34.5% at a reduced intensity, and 3.4% switched to a different sport. The median RTS time was 12 weeks, with 90% returning within 27 weeks. Medicaid patients had a delayed RTS compared with those with commercial insurance (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51). Overweight patients returned sooner than normal-weight patients (HR, 1.41). Female patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.76) and Black patients (OR, 2.34) had lower RTS odds, while recreational (OR, 0.06) and competitive athletes (OR, 0.10) had higher RTS odds versus those not participating in athletic activities.CONCLUSIONOver half of athletes returned to sports within 1 year of TKA, most within 27 weeks. RTS rates varied by preoperative competitive level, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidity burden. These findings can guide patient expectations and shared decision-making regarding post-TKA sports participation. Future research should focus on improving RTS rates in high-risk groups, standardizing RTS criteria, and stratifying outcomes by sport type and impact level to enable more individualized patient recommendations.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"88 1","pages":"3635465251400357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146069960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Outcomes of Autograft and Allograft in Hip Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 自体移植物和异体移植物在髋关节唇部重建中的比较结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251408832
Mark Kurapatti,Matthew Yuro,Brian S Tao,Matthew D Ramey,Srivatsan Swaminathan,Auston R Locke,Niklas H Koehne,Robert L Parisien
BACKGROUNDThere is currently no consensus regarding the superiority of allografts or autografts in labral hip reconstruction.PURPOSETo compare patient outcomes after arthroscopic labral reconstruction using autografts versus allografts.STUDY DESIGNMeta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.METHODSA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were queried on February 2, 2025. Original outcome studies on arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction with clearly delineated graft type and a mean follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Studies with a mean follow-up <1 year, nonarthroscopic labral reconstruction, or unclear graft-specific outcomes were excluded. Data were extracted from 30 studies (1968 hips: 1071 autograft, 897 allograft). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RStudio to assess patient-reported outcomes, revision surgery, and complication rates.RESULTSThere were no significant differences in most patient-reported outcomes: Harris Hip Score (allograft: 27.5 vs autograft: 24.6; P = .17), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living (20.9 vs 22.8; P = .59), HOS Sports (33.2 vs 34.0; P = .65), SF-12 Physical score (10.0 vs 7.0; P = .19), and visual analog scale pain score (-3.5 vs -4.2; P = .34). The SF-12 Mental score improvement was significantly higher in the allograft group (5.2 vs 0.0; P = .03), although sample size was limited. Complication rates approached significance favoring allografts (<1% vs 3%; P = .06). No significant differences were observed in revision arthroscopy (1% allograft vs 5% autograft; P = .07) or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (3% vs 7%; P = .20). Considerable heterogeneity existed in surgical technique and concomitant procedures.CONCLUSIONLabral reconstruction using autograft or allograft tissue produces comparable improvements in most functional and pain outcomes. Use of allograft was associated with significantly higher mental health improvements, and further investigation is warranted to understand if it may carry a lower complication burden.
背景:目前对于同种异体移植和自体移植在唇侧髋关节重建中的优势还没有达成共识。目的比较关节镜下自体移植物与同种异体移植物重建患者的结果。研究DESIGNMeta-analysis;证据等级,4级。方法根据PRISMA(首选系统评价和荟萃分析报告项目)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在2025年2月2日查询了PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库。纳入了关节镜下髋关节唇部重建的原始结果研究,明确描述了移植物类型,平均随访至少1年。排除了平均随访<1年、非关节镜下唇部重建或移植物特异性结果不明确的研究。数据来自30项研究(1968年髋关节:1071例自体移植物,897例异体移植物)。使用RStudio进行随机效应荟萃分析,以评估患者报告的结果、翻修手术和并发症发生率。结果:Harris髋关节评分(同种异体移植:27.5 vs自体移植:24.6;P = 0.17)、髋关节结局评分(HOS)日常生活活动(20.9 vs 22.8; P = 0.59)、HOS运动(33.2 vs 34.0; P = 0.65)、SF-12身体评分(10.0 vs 7.0; P = 0.19)和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(-3.5 vs -4.2; P = 0.34)均无显著差异。同种异体移植组的SF-12心理评分改善明显更高(5.2 vs 0.0; P = .03),尽管样本量有限。同种异体移植的并发症发生率接近显著性(<1% vs 3%; P = 0.06)。在翻修性关节镜检查(1%异体移植物vs 5%自体移植物,P = 0.07)或全髋关节置换术(3% vs 7%, P = 0.20)中未观察到显著差异。在手术技术和伴随手术中存在相当大的异质性。结论采用自体或同种异体组织进行下唇重建在大多数功能和疼痛预后方面都有相当的改善。同种异体移植物的使用显著提高了心理健康的改善,需要进一步的研究来了解它是否会降低并发症的负担。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Autograft and Allograft in Hip Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Mark Kurapatti,Matthew Yuro,Brian S Tao,Matthew D Ramey,Srivatsan Swaminathan,Auston R Locke,Niklas H Koehne,Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1177/03635465251408832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251408832","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThere is currently no consensus regarding the superiority of allografts or autografts in labral hip reconstruction.PURPOSETo compare patient outcomes after arthroscopic labral reconstruction using autografts versus allografts.STUDY DESIGNMeta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.METHODSA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were queried on February 2, 2025. Original outcome studies on arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction with clearly delineated graft type and a mean follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Studies with a mean follow-up <1 year, nonarthroscopic labral reconstruction, or unclear graft-specific outcomes were excluded. Data were extracted from 30 studies (1968 hips: 1071 autograft, 897 allograft). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RStudio to assess patient-reported outcomes, revision surgery, and complication rates.RESULTSThere were no significant differences in most patient-reported outcomes: Harris Hip Score (allograft: 27.5 vs autograft: 24.6; P = .17), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Activities of Daily Living (20.9 vs 22.8; P = .59), HOS Sports (33.2 vs 34.0; P = .65), SF-12 Physical score (10.0 vs 7.0; P = .19), and visual analog scale pain score (-3.5 vs -4.2; P = .34). The SF-12 Mental score improvement was significantly higher in the allograft group (5.2 vs 0.0; P = .03), although sample size was limited. Complication rates approached significance favoring allografts (<1% vs 3%; P = .06). No significant differences were observed in revision arthroscopy (1% allograft vs 5% autograft; P = .07) or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (3% vs 7%; P = .20). Considerable heterogeneity existed in surgical technique and concomitant procedures.CONCLUSIONLabral reconstruction using autograft or allograft tissue produces comparable improvements in most functional and pain outcomes. Use of allograft was associated with significantly higher mental health improvements, and further investigation is warranted to understand if it may carry a lower complication burden.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"296 1","pages":"3635465251408832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medial Hamstrings Used as Autograft for ACL Reconstruction Show an Abnormal Neuromuscular Pattern at the Time of Return to Sport. 内侧腘绳肌用于前交叉韧带重建,在恢复运动时显示出异常的神经肌肉模式。
Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251404915
Sebastiano Nutarelli,Alessandro Sangiorgio,Thomas Legrand,Federico Monzoni,Luca Deabate,Marco Delcogliano,Eamonn Delahunt,Giuseppe Filardo
BACKGROUNDAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the preferred treatment for ACL rupture. Medial hamstring (HS) tendons are the most common autografts. An abnormal mediolateral HS muscle activation pattern after ACLR with an HS autograft could influence return to sport (RTS).PURPOSETo evaluate patients who underwent ACLR with concurrent isokinetic tests and surface electromyography (sEMG) of the medial versus lateral HS compared with a group of healthy controls to identify potential abnormal patterns at RTS.STUDY DESIGNComparative study; Level of evidence, 3.METHODSThe mean medial versus lateral HS sEMG amplitude and timing were measured during isokinetic tests at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec in 92 participants: 46 patients who underwent primary HS-grafted ACLRs (ACLR group) and 46 healthy controls matched for age (18-45 years), sex, and level of physical activity (Tegner, 4-9) (control group). After the 8th postoperative month, the ACLR group were evaluated with an isokinetic test combined with sEMG of the medial and lateral HS. The control group were tested with the same procedure. sEMG data were included only if the minimum criteria for RTS were met according to the published literature (HS/quadriceps ratio ≥60% and quadriceps and HS interlimb peak torque difference at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec ≤10%).RESULTSThere was no difference in isokinetic peak torque normalized to body mass between ACLRs and controls at any tested angular velocity. The mean sEMG amplitude for both the medial and lateral HS showed no between-group difference at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec. No intergroup differences emerged for the mediolateral HS ratio during all tests. Instead, the mean sEMG time-to-peak for the medial HS was consistently faster in the ACLR group (P = .02 at 60 deg/sec; P = .01 at 180 deg/sec; P = .04 at 300 deg/sec), with no intergroup difference for the lateral HS at 60, 180, 300 deg/sec.CONCLUSIONThe grafted medial HS showed consistently faster sEMG time-to-peak in the ACLR group than in the control group at all tested velocities. No differences emerged on sEMG amplitude for the medial HS and on both sEMG amplitude and timing for the lateral HS. Those who underwent HS-grafted ACLR showed a higher neuromuscular demand on the grafted medial HS at RTS. This altered overall HS muscle coordination could affect lower limb biomechanics during active movements, potentially increasing the risk of ACL reinjury.
背景:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)是前交叉韧带断裂的首选治疗方法。内侧腘绳肌腱(HS)是最常见的自体移植物。在ACLR和HS自体移植物后,异常的中外侧HS肌肉激活模式可能影响运动恢复(RTS)。目的通过同步等速运动试验和表面肌电图(sEMG)对行ACLR的患者进行评估,并与一组健康对照组进行比较,以识别RTS的潜在异常模式。研究设计:比较研究;证据水平,3。方法:在等速试验中测量92名参与者在60、180和300度/秒时的平均内侧和外侧HS肌电信号振幅和时间:46名接受原发性HS移植ACLR的患者(ACLR组)和46名年龄(18-45岁)、性别和体力活动水平相匹配的健康对照组(Tegner, 4-9)(对照组)。术后8个月后,ACLR组通过等速运动试验结合内侧和外侧HS的肌电图进行评估。对照组用同样的方法进行测试。只有符合已发表文献中RTS的最低标准(HS/股四头肌比率≥60%,股四头肌和HS在60、180和300度/秒时的肢间峰值扭矩差≤10%)时,才纳入表面肌电信号数据。结果在任何测试的角速度下,ACLRs与对照组的等速峰值转矩与体质量归一化没有差异。在60、180和300度/秒时,内侧和外侧HS的平均表面肌电信号振幅在组间无差异。在所有测试中,中外侧HS比值未出现组间差异。相反,在ACLR组中,内侧HS的平均表面肌电信号达到峰值的时间持续更快(60度/秒时P = 0.02, 180度/秒时P = 0.01, 300度/秒时P = 0.04),而在60、180、300度/秒时,侧侧HS没有组间差异。结论在所有测试速度下,ACLR组移植物内侧HS的表面肌电峰值时间均明显快于对照组。内侧HS的表面肌电信号振幅和外侧HS的表面肌电信号振幅和时间没有差异。接受HS- ACLR移植的患者在RTS时对移植的内侧HS有更高的神经肌肉需求。这种改变的HS肌肉整体协调性可能会影响活跃运动时的下肢生物力学,潜在地增加前交叉韧带再损伤的风险。
{"title":"Medial Hamstrings Used as Autograft for ACL Reconstruction Show an Abnormal Neuromuscular Pattern at the Time of Return to Sport.","authors":"Sebastiano Nutarelli,Alessandro Sangiorgio,Thomas Legrand,Federico Monzoni,Luca Deabate,Marco Delcogliano,Eamonn Delahunt,Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1177/03635465251404915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251404915","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the preferred treatment for ACL rupture. Medial hamstring (HS) tendons are the most common autografts. An abnormal mediolateral HS muscle activation pattern after ACLR with an HS autograft could influence return to sport (RTS).PURPOSETo evaluate patients who underwent ACLR with concurrent isokinetic tests and surface electromyography (sEMG) of the medial versus lateral HS compared with a group of healthy controls to identify potential abnormal patterns at RTS.STUDY DESIGNComparative study; Level of evidence, 3.METHODSThe mean medial versus lateral HS sEMG amplitude and timing were measured during isokinetic tests at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec in 92 participants: 46 patients who underwent primary HS-grafted ACLRs (ACLR group) and 46 healthy controls matched for age (18-45 years), sex, and level of physical activity (Tegner, 4-9) (control group). After the 8th postoperative month, the ACLR group were evaluated with an isokinetic test combined with sEMG of the medial and lateral HS. The control group were tested with the same procedure. sEMG data were included only if the minimum criteria for RTS were met according to the published literature (HS/quadriceps ratio ≥60% and quadriceps and HS interlimb peak torque difference at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec ≤10%).RESULTSThere was no difference in isokinetic peak torque normalized to body mass between ACLRs and controls at any tested angular velocity. The mean sEMG amplitude for both the medial and lateral HS showed no between-group difference at 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec. No intergroup differences emerged for the mediolateral HS ratio during all tests. Instead, the mean sEMG time-to-peak for the medial HS was consistently faster in the ACLR group (P = .02 at 60 deg/sec; P = .01 at 180 deg/sec; P = .04 at 300 deg/sec), with no intergroup difference for the lateral HS at 60, 180, 300 deg/sec.CONCLUSIONThe grafted medial HS showed consistently faster sEMG time-to-peak in the ACLR group than in the control group at all tested velocities. No differences emerged on sEMG amplitude for the medial HS and on both sEMG amplitude and timing for the lateral HS. Those who underwent HS-grafted ACLR showed a higher neuromuscular demand on the grafted medial HS at RTS. This altered overall HS muscle coordination could affect lower limb biomechanics during active movements, potentially increasing the risk of ACL reinjury.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":"3635465251404915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short Femoral In-Tunnel Graft Length Does Not Compromise Graft Healing and Clinical Outcomes After Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft 短股骨隧道内移植物长度不影响自体腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带和前外侧韧带联合重建的移植物愈合和临床效果
Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251404911
Young Tak Cho, Jang Whan Bai, Younghoon Yang, Yu-Seok Kim, Joon Ho Wang
Background: In combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring autografts, a femoral in-tunnel graft length (FTGL) of at least 15 mm has traditionally been recommended. However, achieving this length is not always feasible. Purpose: To evaluate graft healing and clinical outcomes in patients with an intraoperative FTGL target of 10 to 15 mm, and to investigate whether shorter postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–measured FTGL (mFTGL) within this cohort affected outcomes through subgroup analysis. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence: 4 Methods: The records of patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using a quadrupled semitendinosus autograft and ALLR using a gracilis autograft, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. During surgery, the FTGL was intentionally set to fall within the 10- to 15-mm range. Postoperatively, the graft length within the femoral tunnel was measured on postoperative day 2 MRI (mFTGL) and used for analyses. Graft healing was evaluated using 6-month MRI scans: (1) graft incorporation, assessed by the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) at the tunnel (SNQ_tunnel), signal intensity at the graft-bone interface, and tunnel widening; and (2) graft ligamentization, assessed by the SNQ of the graft (SNQ_graft) and Howell grade. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. For subgroup analysis, patients were classified into group 1 (mFTGL ≤12.6 mm) and group 2 (mFTGL >12.6 mm). Results: A total of 180 knees were consecutively enrolled; 169 completed the 6-month MRI evaluation. The graft failure rate was 3.9%. The mean mFTGL was 12.6 ± 2.6 mm. In subgroup analysis, the femoral SNQ_tunnel difference between the tunnel aperture and proximal site was 0.9 ± 3.3 for group 1 and 2.3 ± 3.9 for group 2 ( P = .014). Femoral tunnel widening was 60.1% ± 30.7% for group 1 and 74.3% ± 37.2% for group 2 ( P = .008). In multiple regression analysis, mFTGL (β = 3.28; P < .001) and graft diameter (β = −23.86; P < .001) were independently associated with femoral tunnel widening. Conclusion: In combined ACLR and ALLR, an intraoperative FTGL target of 10 to 15 mm was clinically acceptable regarding graft failure, graft healing, and clinical outcomes. The subgroup with shorter FTGL showed less femoral tunnel widening.
背景:在联合前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)和前外侧韧带重建术(ALLR)中,使用腘绳肌腱自体移植物,传统上推荐股骨隧道内移植物长度(FTGL)至少为15mm。然而,达到这个长度并不总是可行的。目的:评估术中FTGL靶点为10 ~ 15mm患者的移植物愈合和临床结果,并通过亚组分析探讨该队列中较短的术后磁共振成像(MRI)测量的FTGL (mFTGL)是否影响结果。研究设计:病例系列;方法:回顾性回顾了采用自体四倍半腱肌移植行原发性单束ACLR和采用自体股薄肌移植行ALLR的患者的记录,随访时间至少为2年。在手术中,FTGL被有意地设置在10- 15毫米的范围内。术后第2天MRI (mFTGL)测量股骨隧道内移植物长度并用于分析。通过6个月的MRI扫描评估移植物愈合情况:(1)通过隧道处的信噪比(SNQ_tunnel)、移植物-骨界面处的信号强度和隧道拓宽来评估移植物融合;(2)移植物韧带化,以移植物的SNQ (SNQ_graft)和Howell分级评价。临床结果也进行了评估。亚组分析将患者分为1组(mFTGL≤12.6 mm)和2组(mFTGL >12.6 mm)。结果:共入组180例膝关节;169例完成了6个月的MRI评估。移植失败率为3.9%。平均mFTGL为12.6±2.6 mm。在亚组分析中,1组股骨SNQ_tunnel与近端隧道孔径的差异为0.9±3.3,2组为2.3±3.9 (P = 0.014)。组1为60.1%±30.7%,组2为74.3%±37.2% (P = 0.008)。在多元回归分析中,mFTGL (β = 3.28; P < .001)和移植物直径(β = - 23.86; P < .001)与股骨隧道加宽独立相关。结论:在ACLR和ALLR联合治疗中,术中FTGL靶点为10 ~ 15mm,对于移植物失败、移植物愈合和临床结果均是临床可接受的。FTGL较短亚组股骨隧道增宽较小。
{"title":"Short Femoral In-Tunnel Graft Length Does Not Compromise Graft Healing and Clinical Outcomes After Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft","authors":"Young Tak Cho, Jang Whan Bai, Younghoon Yang, Yu-Seok Kim, Joon Ho Wang","doi":"10.1177/03635465251404911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251404911","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring autografts, a femoral in-tunnel graft length (FTGL) of at least 15 mm has traditionally been recommended. However, achieving this length is not always feasible. Purpose: To evaluate graft healing and clinical outcomes in patients with an intraoperative FTGL target of 10 to 15 mm, and to investigate whether shorter postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–measured FTGL (mFTGL) within this cohort affected outcomes through subgroup analysis. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence: 4 Methods: The records of patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using a quadrupled semitendinosus autograft and ALLR using a gracilis autograft, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. During surgery, the FTGL was intentionally set to fall within the 10- to 15-mm range. Postoperatively, the graft length within the femoral tunnel was measured on postoperative day 2 MRI (mFTGL) and used for analyses. Graft healing was evaluated using 6-month MRI scans: (1) graft incorporation, assessed by the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) at the tunnel (SNQ_tunnel), signal intensity at the graft-bone interface, and tunnel widening; and (2) graft ligamentization, assessed by the SNQ of the graft (SNQ_graft) and Howell grade. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. For subgroup analysis, patients were classified into group 1 (mFTGL ≤12.6 mm) and group 2 (mFTGL &gt;12.6 mm). Results: A total of 180 knees were consecutively enrolled; 169 completed the 6-month MRI evaluation. The graft failure rate was 3.9%. The mean mFTGL was 12.6 ± 2.6 mm. In subgroup analysis, the femoral SNQ_tunnel difference between the tunnel aperture and proximal site was 0.9 ± 3.3 for group 1 and 2.3 ± 3.9 for group 2 ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .014). Femoral tunnel widening was 60.1% ± 30.7% for group 1 and 74.3% ± 37.2% for group 2 ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .008). In multiple regression analysis, mFTGL (β = 3.28; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> &lt; .001) and graft diameter (β = −23.86; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> &lt; .001) were independently associated with femoral tunnel widening. Conclusion: In combined ACLR and ALLR, an intraoperative FTGL target of 10 to 15 mm was clinically acceptable regarding graft failure, graft healing, and clinical outcomes. The subgroup with shorter FTGL showed less femoral tunnel widening.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146056185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1