Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2360
H. Malini
This paper investigates the sustainability perspective of Islamic banks' financial decisions, performance, and corporate value where Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and green finance are moderation variables. The analysis method used multivariate statistical methods, structural equation modelling with the WarpPLS software program and testing panel data regression models using the E-Views software program. The datasets used involves 34 Islamic banks in Indonesia. This study found a significant relationship between CSR and green finance implementation to financial decisions, financial performance, and corporate value of Islamic banks in Indonesia. However, the relationship is heterogeneous or dissimilar across different quantiles. This means that CSR and green finance implementation only achieve short-term profit, not long-term sustainability. The study also reveals that corporate social responsibility contributes the most to Islamic banks' investment decisions and market value. Thus, policies focusing on integrated CSR in Islamic banking are required to improve sustainability opportunities.
{"title":"ISLAMIC BANK SUSTAINABILITY IN INDONESIA: VALUE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCES BASED ON SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GREEN FINANCE","authors":"H. Malini","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2360","url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the sustainability perspective of Islamic banks' financial decisions, performance, and corporate value where Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and green finance are moderation variables. The analysis method used multivariate statistical methods, structural equation modelling with the WarpPLS software program and testing panel data regression models using the E-Views software program. The datasets used involves 34 Islamic banks in Indonesia. This study found a significant relationship between CSR and green finance implementation to financial decisions, financial performance, and corporate value of Islamic banks in Indonesia. However, the relationship is heterogeneous or dissimilar across different quantiles. This means that CSR and green finance implementation only achieve short-term profit, not long-term sustainability. The study also reveals that corporate social responsibility contributes the most to Islamic banks' investment decisions and market value. Thus, policies focusing on integrated CSR in Islamic banking are required to improve sustainability opportunities.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86847457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2185
Ovide Egide Manzanga Kpanya
Deliberation on the imprescriptibility principle in international criminal law motivates determination towards the principle's function against impunity for international crimes. It is indeed a question of confronting this principle with judicial responsiveness, which relies on the speed of the criminal response. However, the current criminal response seems somewhat poorly considering the arising crimes. The poor execution enables criminals than the victims, which injures society. Therefore, it leads to inadmissibility. It is for this purpose that imprescriptibility arises and imposes itself comfortably. The research's conclusion attempts to demonstrate another facet of imprescriptibility. Imprescriptibility includes the impunity's ineffectiveness which passes irreversibly where ipso facto ensures impunity. This condition was perceived as a temporary and partial absence of justice that produced its socio-legal effects. Thus, the uncertainty of a judicial reaction resulting implicitly from this principle foster indolence in society. Over time, this would unsurprisingly lead to a denial of justice and eternal impunity.
{"title":"THE WAR AGAINST IMPUNITY FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIME: OPTICAL ILLUSION?","authors":"Ovide Egide Manzanga Kpanya","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2185","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Deliberation on the imprescriptibility principle in international criminal law motivates determination towards the principle's function against impunity for international crimes. It is indeed a question of confronting this principle with judicial responsiveness, which relies on the speed of the criminal response. However, the current criminal response seems somewhat poorly considering the arising crimes. The poor execution enables criminals than the victims, which injures society. Therefore, it leads to inadmissibility. It is for this purpose that imprescriptibility arises and imposes itself comfortably. The research's conclusion attempts to demonstrate another facet of imprescriptibility. Imprescriptibility includes the impunity's ineffectiveness which passes irreversibly where ipso facto ensures impunity. This condition was perceived as a temporary and partial absence of justice that produced its socio-legal effects. Thus, the uncertainty of a judicial reaction resulting implicitly from this principle foster indolence in society. Over time, this would unsurprisingly lead to a denial of justice and eternal impunity.\u0000","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89377403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2364
Nuki Nuki
Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. is a company that runs in the fertilizer industry. Technically, Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.'s board of directors purchase urea fertilizer for the factory, then sold the urea fertilizer to consumers. As a urea fertilizer distributor, Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. should fulfil tax administration obligations, such as reporting tax payments and calculations. However, Sumber Urip Sejati Ltd.’s administration is highly engineered by the company’s directors because Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. is operating even though it is declared bankrupt. The situation escalades when the company is faced with unfulfilled tax obligation. Therefore, the main problem in this research is the director board of Sumber Urip Sejati Utama's Ltd. civil liability and legal consequences towards the tax in debt due to the board’s negligence. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical approach, which is an approach based on the primary legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and legislation. The research elaborates that the civil liability of Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.’s director board towards the tax in debts is in a form of joint responsibility or responsibility. Moreover, the legal consequences faced by the director boards due to their negligence is that directors should bear all of the company's debts to creditors and third parties, to the extent of using the directors' assets to cover the losses.
Sumber Urip Sejati Utama有限公司是一家经营化肥行业的公司。从技术上讲，Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.的董事会为工厂购买尿素肥料，然后将尿素肥料出售给消费者。作为尿素肥料分销商，Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.应履行税务管理义务，如申报纳税和计算。然而，Sumber Urip Sejati Ltd.的管理是由公司董事精心设计的，因为Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.即使被宣布破产也在运营。当公司面临未履行的纳税义务时，情况就会升级。因此，本研究的主要问题是Sumber Urip Sejati Utama's Ltd.的董事董事会对由于董事会疏忽而导致的欠税的民事责任和法律后果。本研究采用的研究方法是规范法学方法，即以原始法律材料为基础，通过对理论、概念、法理和立法的考察。研究阐述了Sumber Urip Sejati Utama有限公司董事会对欠税的民事责任是连带责任或责任的形式。此外，董事因其疏忽所面临的法律后果是，董事应承担公司对债权人和第三方的全部债务，并以董事的资产来弥补损失。
{"title":"THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF A BANKRUPT COMPANY’S CIVIL LIABILITY FOR OBTAINED TAXES","authors":"Nuki Nuki","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2364","url":null,"abstract":"Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. is a company that runs in the fertilizer industry. Technically, Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.'s board of directors purchase urea fertilizer for the factory, then sold the urea fertilizer to consumers. As a urea fertilizer distributor, Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. should fulfil tax administration obligations, such as reporting tax payments and calculations. However, Sumber Urip Sejati Ltd.’s administration is highly engineered by the company’s directors because Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd. is operating even though it is declared bankrupt. The situation escalades when the company is faced with unfulfilled tax obligation. Therefore, the main problem in this research is the director board of Sumber Urip Sejati Utama's Ltd. civil liability and legal consequences towards the tax in debt due to the board’s negligence. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical approach, which is an approach based on the primary legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and legislation. The research elaborates that the civil liability of Sumber Urip Sejati Utama Ltd.’s director board towards the tax in debts is in a form of joint responsibility or responsibility. Moreover, the legal consequences faced by the director boards due to their negligence is that directors should bear all of the company's debts to creditors and third parties, to the extent of using the directors' assets to cover the losses.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89341904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-31DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2363
M. Hendriani
There are many ways to purchase a vehicle, including a credit system. However, various problems arise in its application regarding the settlement of bad loans caused by default debtors. This study aims to analyse the efforts made by Federal International Finance Ltd. (FIF) Bandar Lampung City in resolving motor vehicle bad loans due to default debtors. This study uses empirical normative legal research methods and qualitative descriptive methods. The data is obtained from direct observations and interviews, then linked to legal regulations concerning the default problem. The results indicate that Federal International Finance Ltd. has an ideal solution to resolve bad Loans through litigation and non-litigation. Efforts to settle bad loans through non-litigation could be made by giving a subpoena to the debtor. Furthermore, the creditor could take litigation by filing a civil lawsuit against the debtor for default according to Article 1243 of the Civil Code.
{"title":"LOANS SETTLEMENT AT FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE Ltd. (FIF) BANDAR LAMPUNG CITY","authors":"M. Hendriani","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no2.2363","url":null,"abstract":"There are many ways to purchase a vehicle, including a credit system. However, various problems arise in its application regarding the settlement of bad loans caused by default debtors. This study aims to analyse the efforts made by Federal International Finance Ltd. (FIF) Bandar Lampung City in resolving motor vehicle bad loans due to default debtors. This study uses empirical normative legal research methods and qualitative descriptive methods. The data is obtained from direct observations and interviews, then linked to legal regulations concerning the default problem. The results indicate that Federal International Finance Ltd. has an ideal solution to resolve bad Loans through litigation and non-litigation. Efforts to settle bad loans through non-litigation could be made by giving a subpoena to the debtor. Furthermore, the creditor could take litigation by filing a civil lawsuit against the debtor for default according to Article 1243 of the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79634518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-29DOI: 10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2006
Adam Khafi Ferdinand, Sunarto Dm, Maya Shafira
Persekongkolan tender dan tindak pidana korupsi memiliki hubungan erat karena berkaitan dengan pengadaan barang dan jasa yang dilakukan pemerintah, karena sebagian atau seluruhnya pengadaan dibiayai dari APBN/APBD atau anggaran negara lainnya. Perbuatan dalam persekongkolan tender juga dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu, terdapat dua lembaga penegak hukum yang berwenang menindak para pelakunya, yakni KPPU dan KPK. Tujuan dari penulisan jurnal ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana upaya penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU dan KPK, serta apa saja faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi proses penegakan hukumnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penulisan hukum normatif yang didukung dengan data dan informasi dari wawancara/kuisioner. Sementara itu, pendekatan yang dilakukan yakni menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini menerangkan bahwa penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU terhadap perkara persekongkolan tender dilaksanakan berdasarkan UU No.5/1999 (UU Anti Monopoli), Perkom No.1/2019 dan Perkom No.2/2010 (Pedoman Pasal 22). Sedangkan, penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah dilakukan oleh KPK terhadap perkara tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan UU No.31/1999 jo. UU No.20/2001 (UU Tipikor), UU No.30/2002 jo. UU No.19/2019 (UU KPK) dan KUHAP. Kedua lembaga tersebut memang memiliki ruang lingkup dan kewenangannya masing-masing, namun keduanya juga memiliki kerjasama dalam hal pengawasan dan penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang tertuang dalam Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) antara KPPU dan KPK. Sementara itu, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU dan KPK, antara lain faktor peraturan perundang-undangan (substansi hukum), faktor penegak hukum, faktor sarana/fasilitas, faktor masyarakat dan faktor kebudayaan.
{"title":"PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMERINTAH OLEH KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) DAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK)","authors":"Adam Khafi Ferdinand, Sunarto Dm, Maya Shafira","doi":"10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2006","url":null,"abstract":"Persekongkolan tender dan tindak pidana korupsi memiliki hubungan erat karena berkaitan dengan pengadaan barang dan jasa yang dilakukan pemerintah, karena sebagian atau seluruhnya pengadaan dibiayai dari APBN/APBD atau anggaran negara lainnya. Perbuatan dalam persekongkolan tender juga dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu, terdapat dua lembaga penegak hukum yang berwenang menindak para pelakunya, yakni KPPU dan KPK. Tujuan dari penulisan jurnal ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana upaya penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU dan KPK, serta apa saja faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi proses penegakan hukumnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penulisan hukum normatif yang didukung dengan data dan informasi dari wawancara/kuisioner. Sementara itu, pendekatan yang dilakukan yakni menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini menerangkan bahwa penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU terhadap perkara persekongkolan tender dilaksanakan berdasarkan UU No.5/1999 (UU Anti Monopoli), Perkom No.1/2019 dan Perkom No.2/2010 (Pedoman Pasal 22). Sedangkan, penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah dilakukan oleh KPK terhadap perkara tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan UU No.31/1999 jo. UU No.20/2001 (UU Tipikor), UU No.30/2002 jo. UU No.19/2019 (UU KPK) dan KUHAP. Kedua lembaga tersebut memang memiliki ruang lingkup dan kewenangannya masing-masing, namun keduanya juga memiliki kerjasama dalam hal pengawasan dan penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang tertuang dalam Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) antara KPPU dan KPK. Sementara itu, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah yang dilakukan oleh KPPU dan KPK, antara lain faktor peraturan perundang-undangan (substansi hukum), faktor penegak hukum, faktor sarana/fasilitas, faktor masyarakat dan faktor kebudayaan.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84176978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-29DOI: 10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2079
Bertoni Dean Simamora
Rusia merupakan negara yang memiliki wilayah yang sangat luas dan sumber daya yang banyak. Februari 2014 Rusia melakukan aksi aneksasi di Semenanjung Krimea. Konsekuensi anekasi Krimea oleh Rusia melampaui kekhawatiran akan kedaulatan tanah dan jauh ke perairan Laut Hitam terutama yang berhubungan dengan laut Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif. Pada Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif, negara pantai memiliki hak untuk mengatur segala kegiatan eksplorasi dan juga eksploitasi sumber daya alam di permukaan laut, di dasar laut dan juga di bawah laut, serta mengadakan penelitian sumber daya hayati maupun sumber daya laut yang lainnya. Timbul permasalahan yaitu: bagaimana perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi ekslusif Rusia di Laut Hitam Pasca Aneksasi Krimea dan bagaimana dampak bertambahnya wilayah laut zona ekonomi ekslusif Rusia di laut hitam akibat aneksasi Krimea terhadap Ukraina. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat mengenai perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi eksklusif Rusia di Laut Hitam pasca aneksasi Krimea serta dampaknya terhadap Ukraina. Metode penelitian yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah Metode penelititan normatif yang bersifat kualitatif dalam penelitian terhadap bahan pustaka yang merupakan data dasar yang dalam ilmu pengetahuan digolongkan sebagai data sekunder yang bertumpu kepada alat pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen atas permasalahan perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi eksklusif Rusia di laut Hitam pasca aneksasi Krimea. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa erubahan wilayah laut Rusia di laut hitam yang sangat signifikan tentunya juga akan memberi keuntungan yang sangat besar dalam pemanfaatan zona ekonomi ekslusif yang baru ini bagi Rusia. Mahakamah Internasional (International Court of Justice) dapat menyelesaikan konflik antara Ukraina dan Rusia. UNCLOS 1982 dapat digunakan sebagai panduan dalam penyelesaian masalah mengingat Rusia dan Ukraina. Bagi Ukraina, Kebutuhan Ekonomi dalam bidang ekonomi seperti Perikanan, Kebutuhan barang tambang, arus lalu lintas laut, kebutuhan Angkatan perang Ukraina, dan jalur perdagangan menjadi dampak di aneksasinya Krimea oleh Rusia.
{"title":"PERUBAHAN WILAYAH LAUT ZONA EKONOMI EKSLUSIF RUSIA DI LAUT HITAM PASCA ANEKSASI KRIMEA","authors":"Bertoni Dean Simamora","doi":"10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/CEPALO.V4NO2.2079","url":null,"abstract":"Rusia merupakan negara yang memiliki wilayah yang sangat luas dan sumber daya yang banyak. Februari 2014 Rusia melakukan aksi aneksasi di Semenanjung Krimea. Konsekuensi anekasi Krimea oleh Rusia melampaui kekhawatiran akan kedaulatan tanah dan jauh ke perairan Laut Hitam terutama yang berhubungan dengan laut Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif. Pada Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif, negara pantai memiliki hak untuk mengatur segala kegiatan eksplorasi dan juga eksploitasi sumber daya alam di permukaan laut, di dasar laut dan juga di bawah laut, serta mengadakan penelitian sumber daya hayati maupun sumber daya laut yang lainnya. Timbul permasalahan yaitu: bagaimana perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi ekslusif Rusia di Laut Hitam Pasca Aneksasi Krimea dan bagaimana dampak bertambahnya wilayah laut zona ekonomi ekslusif Rusia di laut hitam akibat aneksasi Krimea terhadap Ukraina. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat mengenai perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi eksklusif Rusia di Laut Hitam pasca aneksasi Krimea serta dampaknya terhadap Ukraina. Metode penelitian yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah Metode penelititan normatif yang bersifat kualitatif dalam penelitian terhadap bahan pustaka yang merupakan data dasar yang dalam ilmu pengetahuan digolongkan sebagai data sekunder yang bertumpu kepada alat pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen atas permasalahan perubahan wilayah laut zona ekonomi eksklusif Rusia di laut Hitam pasca aneksasi Krimea. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa erubahan wilayah laut Rusia di laut hitam yang sangat signifikan tentunya juga akan memberi keuntungan yang sangat besar dalam pemanfaatan zona ekonomi ekslusif yang baru ini bagi Rusia. Mahakamah Internasional (International Court of Justice) dapat menyelesaikan konflik antara Ukraina dan Rusia. UNCLOS 1982 dapat digunakan sebagai panduan dalam penyelesaian masalah mengingat Rusia dan Ukraina. Bagi Ukraina, Kebutuhan Ekonomi dalam bidang ekonomi seperti Perikanan, Kebutuhan barang tambang, arus lalu lintas laut, kebutuhan Angkatan perang Ukraina, dan jalur perdagangan menjadi dampak di aneksasinya Krimea oleh Rusia.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88531884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-05DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1882
La Ode Angga La Ode Angga
Writing Entitled "Maintaining Hormani Brothers And Sistersand And Preserving Ecosystems In Maluku" Aims To Maintain The Harmony Of The Basudara People In Maluku On One Side And To Preserve The Ecosystem On The Other Side, Is A Must That Must Be Done By All Components Of The Nation's Children In Maluku, Both Of Them Are Two Sides Of A Very Important Coin In Carrying Out Life On This Earth So That The Earth Remains Balanced, In Harmony And Will Give Birth To Positive Energy For The Welfare Of Humanity. This Can Be Done In The Form Of; Togetherness, Friendship, Brotherhood, Love Between Fellow Siblings In Maluku, And Can Also Be Done In The Form Of A Uterus, This Will All Give Birth To Harmony Among Fellow Sisters On One Side And On The Other Hand Will Be More Beautiful And Have A High Civilization Value If Basudara People In The Land Of The Kings Is Maintaining The Preservation Of The Ecosystem In Maluku Which Will Give Birth To Harmony Between Humans And Nature (The Environment).
{"title":"SAFEGUARDING HORMANI BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND CARRYING OUT LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION IN MALUKU","authors":"La Ode Angga La Ode Angga","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1882","url":null,"abstract":"Writing Entitled \"Maintaining Hormani Brothers And Sistersand And Preserving Ecosystems In Maluku\" Aims To Maintain The Harmony Of The Basudara People In Maluku On One Side And To Preserve The Ecosystem On The Other Side, Is A Must That Must Be Done By All Components Of The Nation's Children In Maluku, Both Of Them Are Two Sides Of A Very Important Coin In Carrying Out Life On This Earth So That The Earth Remains Balanced, In Harmony And Will Give Birth To Positive Energy For The Welfare Of Humanity. This Can Be Done In The Form Of; Togetherness, Friendship, Brotherhood, Love Between Fellow Siblings In Maluku, And Can Also Be Done In The Form Of A Uterus, This Will All Give Birth To Harmony Among Fellow Sisters On One Side And On The Other Hand Will Be More Beautiful And Have A High Civilization Value If Basudara People In The Land Of The Kings Is Maintaining The Preservation Of The Ecosystem In Maluku Which Will Give Birth To Harmony Between Humans And Nature (The Environment).","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81777399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-05DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1913
Rizha Claudilla Putri
Perusahaan dapat dibedakan atas perusahaan badan hukum dan perusahaan bukan badan hukum. Di Indonesia, Perusahaan badan hukum dapat berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas (PT), Yayasan dan Koperasi. Sedangkan perusahaan bukan badan hukum dapat berupa Firma (Fa) dan Persekutuan Komanditer atau Comanditaire Vennootschap (CV). Peraturan mengenai bentuk perusahaan persekutuan, firma dan CV terdapat di dalam KUHPer dan KUHD. Sama halnya seperti di Indonesia, bentuk hukum suatu perusahaan Malaysia dapat dikenal dengan beberapa bentuk business entitiy, seperti Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), Private Limited Company/SendirianBerhad (Sdn Bhd), dan Public Limited Company/Berhad (Bhd). Beberapa Business Entity yang ada di Malaysia memiliki kemiripan dengan jenis badan usaha yang ada di Indonesia, seperti Partnership atau Perusahaan Persekutuan. Terdapat pula perbedaan antara bentuk dan peraturan yang mengatur perusahaan persekutuan Indonesia dengan perusahaan persekutuan Malaysia. Undang-Undang yang digunakan pun berbeda bagi kedua negara, Partnership diatur dalam Partnership Act 1961 sedangkan untuk Limited Liability Partnership diatur dalam Limited Liability Act 2012. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang didapat dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan dokumen serta diolah dengan melakukan seleksi data secara sistematis untuk mendapatkan gambaran umum dari hasil penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam Partnership mengatur mengenai perusahaan secara tradisional dengan ingin mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan. Sedangkan di dalam LLP menggabungkan antara partnership dan company. Perbedaan bentuk hukum perusahaan persekutuan antara Indonesia dan Malaysia ini juga jelas terlihat jika dilihat dari aturan pada masing-masing negara dimana Indonesia tidak mempunyai undang-undang khusus mengenai bentuk hukum persekutuan ini. Dengan demikian, pemerintah hendaknya membuat sebuah undang-undang yang mengatur mengenai bentuk usaha persekutuan lebih khusus dalam peraturan yang berbeda agar dapat mudah dipahami oleh pelaku usaha seperti peraturan yang berlaku di negara Malaysia.
{"title":"BENTUK HUKUM PERUSAHAAN PERSEKUTUAN DI INDONESIA DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DI MALAYSIA","authors":"Rizha Claudilla Putri","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1913","url":null,"abstract":"Perusahaan dapat dibedakan atas perusahaan badan hukum dan perusahaan bukan badan hukum. Di Indonesia, Perusahaan badan hukum dapat berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas (PT), Yayasan dan Koperasi. Sedangkan perusahaan bukan badan hukum dapat berupa Firma (Fa) dan Persekutuan Komanditer atau Comanditaire Vennootschap (CV). Peraturan mengenai bentuk perusahaan persekutuan, firma dan CV terdapat di dalam KUHPer dan KUHD. Sama halnya seperti di Indonesia, bentuk hukum suatu perusahaan Malaysia dapat dikenal dengan beberapa bentuk business entitiy, seperti Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), Private Limited Company/SendirianBerhad (Sdn Bhd), dan Public Limited Company/Berhad (Bhd). Beberapa Business Entity yang ada di Malaysia memiliki kemiripan dengan jenis badan usaha yang ada di Indonesia, seperti Partnership atau Perusahaan Persekutuan. Terdapat pula perbedaan antara bentuk dan peraturan yang mengatur perusahaan persekutuan Indonesia dengan perusahaan persekutuan Malaysia. Undang-Undang yang digunakan pun berbeda bagi kedua negara, Partnership diatur dalam Partnership Act 1961 sedangkan untuk Limited Liability Partnership diatur dalam Limited Liability Act 2012. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang didapat dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan dokumen serta diolah dengan melakukan seleksi data secara sistematis untuk mendapatkan gambaran umum dari hasil penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam Partnership mengatur mengenai perusahaan secara tradisional dengan ingin mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan. Sedangkan di dalam LLP menggabungkan antara partnership dan company. Perbedaan bentuk hukum perusahaan persekutuan antara Indonesia dan Malaysia ini juga jelas terlihat jika dilihat dari aturan pada masing-masing negara dimana Indonesia tidak mempunyai undang-undang khusus mengenai bentuk hukum persekutuan ini. Dengan demikian, pemerintah hendaknya membuat sebuah undang-undang yang mengatur mengenai bentuk usaha persekutuan lebih khusus dalam peraturan yang berbeda agar dapat mudah dipahami oleh pelaku usaha seperti peraturan yang berlaku di negara Malaysia. ","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80721826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-05DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1897
Ahmad Syarifudin
Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilihan Umum (Pemilu) dan implikasi adanya upaya hukum ke Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) terhadap putusan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu Bawaslu Provinsi atau Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota yang dianggap turut menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum dan mengancam hak seseorang untuk dipilih (right to be elected). Riset ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang berarti hanya akan meneliti tentang norma peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu dengan mengandalkan bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum, Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum di Mahkamah Agung serta bahan hukum sekunder yaitu buku, jurnal, dan hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan tema yang sama yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan kemudian dianalisis secara yuridis-kuantitatif sehingga diperoleh hasil yaitu: Pertama, penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilu diatur di dalam Pasal 460 sampai Pasal 465 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum serta peraturan di bawahnya yaitu Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum yang keduanya mengatur penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilu dilaksanakan secara terbuka dan harus diputus paling lama 14 hari sejak laporan/temuan diterima. Kedua, implikasi dari adanya upaya hukum ke Bawaslu atas putusan Bawaslu Provinsi atau Kabupaten/kota justru dapat menghambat kinerja Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) serta berpotensi kehilangan hak menempuh upaya hukum ke Mahkamah Agung bagi calon yang dibatalkan sebagai calon oleh Keputusan KPU atas dasar putusan Bawaslu Provinsi atau Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota.
写作本文旨在探讨和解过程违反选举(选举)的行政和法律含义的努力去选举监督机构(Bawaslu)对行政裁决违反选举Bawaslu省或县Bawaslu -的城市被视为有助于创造法律和不确定性威胁别人选择的权利(right to be elected)。这项研究是规范法的研究，它将仅仅通过依赖2017年选举权法案第7条的主要法律材料来研究与违反选举有关的法律规范，2018年8号规则选举监督机构关于违反选举行政和结业证书规定的4号2017年最高法院关于结业证书条例违反选举在最高法院的行政和法律材料即书籍、期刊和次要研究获得的有关同一主题的文学研究,然后yuridis-kuantitatif地分析,获得的结果:首先,选举行政违规固定在结业证书465章460,直到2017年7号法律关于选举和选举监督机构的规则下面就是8号2018年两者的结业证书违反选举行政管理违反公开选举行政执行和结业证书必须断开以来最多14天-发现接受报告。第二,法律存在的含义,努力去Bawaslu对判决Bawaslu省或地区/城市性能反而会阻碍选举(选举委员会)和失去潜在努力追求权利法律为潜在的最高法院取消作为候选人的选举的决定是基于判决Bawaslu省或Bawaslu -城市区。
{"title":"IMPLIKASI ADANYA UPAYA HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BAWASLU TENTANG PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRATIF PEMILU","authors":"Ahmad Syarifudin","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1897","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1897","url":null,"abstract":"Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilihan Umum (Pemilu) dan implikasi adanya upaya hukum ke Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) terhadap putusan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu Bawaslu Provinsi atau Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota yang dianggap turut menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum dan mengancam hak seseorang untuk dipilih (right to be elected). Riset ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang berarti hanya akan meneliti tentang norma peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu dengan mengandalkan bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum, Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum di Mahkamah Agung serta bahan hukum sekunder yaitu buku, jurnal, dan hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan tema yang sama yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan kemudian dianalisis secara yuridis-kuantitatif sehingga diperoleh hasil yaitu: Pertama, penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilu diatur di dalam Pasal 460 sampai Pasal 465 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum serta peraturan di bawahnya yaitu Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum yang keduanya mengatur penyelesaian pelanggaran administratif Pemilu dilaksanakan secara terbuka dan harus diputus paling lama 14 hari sejak laporan/temuan diterima. Kedua, implikasi dari adanya upaya hukum ke Bawaslu atas putusan Bawaslu Provinsi atau Kabupaten/kota justru dapat menghambat kinerja Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) serta berpotensi kehilangan hak menempuh upaya hukum ke Mahkamah Agung bagi calon yang dibatalkan sebagai calon oleh Keputusan KPU atas dasar putusan Bawaslu Provinsi atau Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78288286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-05DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1910
Dina Silvia Puteri, Denita Cahyanti Wahono, Rr. Jannatul Firdaus, Steven Sukamdani
Chemical castration is an additional penalty for child sexual abuse stipulated under Protection of Children Law, which states that anyone who intentionally commits sexual violence against children in any way and with certain criminal elements is subject to additional penalties in the form of chemical castration. As an additional penalty, chemical castration is excessive and deprives the right to reproduction. The criminal application also explicitly overrides state protection of human rights based on international conventions such as the ICCPR and UNCAT 1948 which has been ratified by Indonesia Human Rights Law. The implementation of chemical castration in Indonesia may able to reduce the number of habitual crimes or recidivists on sexual offender still raise the pros and cons. On the other hand, the effectiveness of this method in preventing these crimes is still debatable. The Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI) rejects the assignment of the execution because the additional penalty execution by the doctor is in contrary to the Indonesian Medical Ethics Code. This study aims to find solutions to conflict of law that occur in the application of chemical castration in the perspective of criminal law and human rights.
{"title":"CHEMICAL CASTRATION FROM CRIMINAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS","authors":"Dina Silvia Puteri, Denita Cahyanti Wahono, Rr. Jannatul Firdaus, Steven Sukamdani","doi":"10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1910","url":null,"abstract":"Chemical castration is an additional penalty for child sexual abuse stipulated under Protection of Children Law, which states that anyone who intentionally commits sexual violence against children in any way and with certain criminal elements is subject to additional penalties in the form of chemical castration. As an additional penalty, chemical castration is excessive and deprives the right to reproduction. The criminal application also explicitly overrides state protection of human rights based on international conventions such as the ICCPR and UNCAT 1948 which has been ratified by Indonesia Human Rights Law. The implementation of chemical castration in Indonesia may able to reduce the number of habitual crimes or recidivists on sexual offender still raise the pros and cons. On the other hand, the effectiveness of this method in preventing these crimes is still debatable. The Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI) rejects the assignment of the execution because the additional penalty execution by the doctor is in contrary to the Indonesian Medical Ethics Code. This study aims to find solutions to conflict of law that occur in the application of chemical castration in the perspective of criminal law and human rights.","PeriodicalId":52705,"journal":{"name":"Cepalo","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78242248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：