首页 > 最新文献

COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES最新文献

英文 中文
Chaucer and the Ethics of Time by Gillian Adler (review) 《乔叟与时间伦理》作者:吉莉安·阿德勒(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912677
Arpit Gaind
Reviewed by: Chaucer and the Ethics of Time by Gillian Adler Arpit Gaind Gillian Adler, Chaucer and the Ethics of Time (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2022), x + 230 pp. In Chaucer and the Ethics of Time, Gillian Adler examines temporality and structures of time in the works of fourteenth-century English poet Geoffrey Chaucer. Adler picks five of Chaucer’s seminal works, organized as five separate chapters with an introduction and a conclusion, addressing themes of morality, aesthetics, and epistemological structures in order to show the “temporal ethics” (2) of time in Chaucer’s poetry. Chaucer and the Ethics of Time demonstrates the ways in which Chaucer argued for ideas of subjectivity, free will, and chance that govern human individuality. Drawing from Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy and Augustine’s Confessions, Adler examines how time is experienced and the role of “intentionality” in understanding the past and its relevance to the present. According to Adler, the active transformation of the “now” and shaping how memory is structured govern Chaucer’s project of human ethics (7). Adler also explores Chaucer’s reworking of the moral and social discourses on temporality in the Middle Ages, where wasting time was considered a “sin of acedia.” In “The Process of Time in the Parliament of Fowls,” Adler starts with the writings of Shakespeare while giving a vivid description of the medieval notion of wasting time as a sin and expressing time as a virtue (124). However, Adler shows how Chaucer, in his works, departs from such a binary of sins and vices and points toward a more complex relationship that temporality shares with human subjectivity. The author points out the use of subversion in Chaucer as a way to move toward ambiguity showing temporal discourses as neither “productive” nor objectively accurate. Adler draws upon Chaucer’s work on poetic form and its impact on temporality by distinguishing between “story” and “narrative.” The former, for Chaucer, is a depiction of events, and the latter is about the structure of those events and the retelling of the story. For Adler, the dichotomy of story and narrative in Chaucer’s work is of great significance, as it shows the representational practices of language and literature during the Middle Ages; the poet created both “tales on time” and “tales about time” (17). Another theme of significance in Chaucer and the Ethics of Time is the question of “anachronism.” Adler argues that Chaucer’s works counterpose the wholeness and singularity of time and reasons for the ruptures and “fragmentations” that emerge in the human experience of time (39). For instance, in “Seeing Time and the Illusion of Control in Troilus and Criseyde,” Adler draws upon Chaucer’s Translation of Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy in Troilus and Criseyde. Adler demonstrates well how Chaucer constructs time and its impact on the Thebes-Trojan “historical continuum,” as well as what the city of London as a fantasy mea
吉莉安·阿德勒,《乔叟与时间伦理》(加的夫:威尔士大学出版社,2022年),x + 230页。在《乔叟与时间伦理》中,吉莉安·阿德勒考察了14世纪英国诗人杰弗里·乔叟作品中的时间性和时间结构。阿德勒选择了乔叟的五部影响深远的作品,分为五个独立的章节,包括引言和结论,讨论道德、美学和认识论结构的主题,以展示乔叟诗歌中时间的“时间伦理”(2)。《乔叟与时间伦理》展示了乔叟如何论证支配人类个性的主体性、自由意志和机会等观念。从波伊提乌的《哲学的慰藉》和奥古斯丁的《忏悔录》中,阿德勒考察了时间是如何被体验的,以及“意向性”在理解过去及其与现在的关联中的作用。根据阿德勒的观点,对“现在”的积极转变和对记忆结构的塑造支配着乔叟的人类伦理计划(7)。阿德勒还探讨了乔叟对中世纪关于时间性的道德和社会话语的改造,在中世纪,浪费时间被认为是一种“绝望之罪”。在《家禽议会中的时间进程》一书中,阿德勒从莎士比亚的作品开始,生动地描述了中世纪的观念,即浪费时间是一种罪恶,把时间表达为一种美德(124页)。然而,阿德勒展示了乔叟如何在他的作品中脱离这种罪恶与罪恶的二元对立,并指出了时间性与人类主体性之间更为复杂的关系。作者指出,乔叟对颠覆的使用是一种走向模糊性的方式,表明时间话语既不“富有成效”,也不客观准确。阿德勒通过区分“故事”和“叙事”,借鉴了乔叟关于诗歌形式及其对时间性的影响的作品。对乔叟来说,前者是对事件的描述,后者是关于这些事件的结构和故事的重述。在阿德勒看来,乔叟作品中故事与叙事的二分法具有重要意义,因为它体现了中世纪语言和文学的表征实践;诗人创作了“关于时间的故事”和“关于时间的故事”(17)。《乔叟与时间伦理》的另一个重要主题是“时代错误”问题。阿德勒认为,乔叟的作品反对时间的整体性和单一性,以及人类时间体验中出现的断裂和“碎片化”的原因(39)。例如,在《特洛伊罗斯与克里塞德》中,阿德勒引用了乔叟翻译的波伊提乌的《特洛伊罗斯与克里塞德的哲学慰藉》。阿德勒很好地展示了乔叟如何构建时间,以及它对底比斯-特洛伊“历史连续体”的影响,以及作为幻想的伦敦城对读者意味着什么(61)。在“什么会永恒?”阿德勒考察了乔叟在展示名声的“时间维度”时所使用的一系列文学手段——比如“典故”和“编目”(96)。阿德勒对《名人堂》做了出色的考察,展示了乔叟对存在主义、永恒和欲望的关注。阿德勒对乔叟作品的阅读表明,乔叟作品的形式和话语与他所借鉴的人物之间存在着密切的相互作用。本文考察了乔叟对不安全感在人类经历中的核心作用的看法,以及这如何帮助读者理解乔叟写作的时期。在《乔叟框架中的非线性时间——叙事和巴斯的妻子的序言》一书中,阿德勒借鉴了《坎特伯雷故事集》,特别是《巴斯的妻子》的序言,展示了叙事是如何在概念上作为乔叟作品的分析工具而被构建起来的。阿德勒认为,序言成为了一个实例,角色对记忆、怀旧和未来时间的倾向成为叙述故事的一种方式。回到乔叟对模棱两可的使用,阿德勒展示了事件的时间顺序如何成为批评的一个重要方面……
{"title":"Chaucer and the Ethics of Time by Gillian Adler (review)","authors":"Arpit Gaind","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912677","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Chaucer and the Ethics of Time by Gillian Adler Arpit Gaind Gillian Adler, Chaucer and the Ethics of Time (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2022), x + 230 pp. In Chaucer and the Ethics of Time, Gillian Adler examines temporality and structures of time in the works of fourteenth-century English poet Geoffrey Chaucer. Adler picks five of Chaucer’s seminal works, organized as five separate chapters with an introduction and a conclusion, addressing themes of morality, aesthetics, and epistemological structures in order to show the “temporal ethics” (2) of time in Chaucer’s poetry. Chaucer and the Ethics of Time demonstrates the ways in which Chaucer argued for ideas of subjectivity, free will, and chance that govern human individuality. Drawing from Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy and Augustine’s Confessions, Adler examines how time is experienced and the role of “intentionality” in understanding the past and its relevance to the present. According to Adler, the active transformation of the “now” and shaping how memory is structured govern Chaucer’s project of human ethics (7). Adler also explores Chaucer’s reworking of the moral and social discourses on temporality in the Middle Ages, where wasting time was considered a “sin of acedia.” In “The Process of Time in the Parliament of Fowls,” Adler starts with the writings of Shakespeare while giving a vivid description of the medieval notion of wasting time as a sin and expressing time as a virtue (124). However, Adler shows how Chaucer, in his works, departs from such a binary of sins and vices and points toward a more complex relationship that temporality shares with human subjectivity. The author points out the use of subversion in Chaucer as a way to move toward ambiguity showing temporal discourses as neither “productive” nor objectively accurate. Adler draws upon Chaucer’s work on poetic form and its impact on temporality by distinguishing between “story” and “narrative.” The former, for Chaucer, is a depiction of events, and the latter is about the structure of those events and the retelling of the story. For Adler, the dichotomy of story and narrative in Chaucer’s work is of great significance, as it shows the representational practices of language and literature during the Middle Ages; the poet created both “tales on time” and “tales about time” (17). Another theme of significance in Chaucer and the Ethics of Time is the question of “anachronism.” Adler argues that Chaucer’s works counterpose the wholeness and singularity of time and reasons for the ruptures and “fragmentations” that emerge in the human experience of time (39). For instance, in “Seeing Time and the Illusion of Control in Troilus and Criseyde,” Adler draws upon Chaucer’s Translation of Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy in Troilus and Criseyde. Adler demonstrates well how Chaucer constructs time and its impact on the Thebes-Trojan “historical continuum,” as well as what the city of London as a fantasy mea","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating Identities in Late Antiquity: A Case Study of the Roman Weapons Burial Deposit from the Sintrivani Basilica in Thessaloniki 调查古代晚期的身份:以塞萨洛尼基Sintrivani Basilica的罗马武器埋葬沉积物为例
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912675
Errikos Maniotis
Abstract: The identification of “peoples” is the oldest purpose that the study of burial rites has been made to serve. Written sources tell us that in late antiquity different peoples migrated into the Roman Empire, both in the Western and in the Eastern half. Cemetery archaeology provides one of the most important sources for early medieval social history. Weapon deposits should not be excluded from this process. The current paper investigates the armament of a soldier’s burial found in a grave attached to the so-called Sintrivani Basilica in Thessaloniki, Greece, dated to the early fifth century CE and how the study of arms and armor combined with other archaeological findings could help us to explore identities in late antiquity. The most interesting weapon of the deceased from the whole hoard is the sword that had been found bent. This striking and critical feature led me to correlate it with the ritual of “killing a weapon.” The bent sword expresses complex social statements about status and identity and functions as a clue that the soldier was a “Romanized” Goth or from another Germanic tribe who served as a mercenary (foederatus) in the imperial Roman forces. Considering the importance of the burial location, it is also clear that the deceased was a high-ranking officer of the Roman army.
摘要:对“民族”的识别是墓葬研究最古老的目的。书面资料告诉我们,在古代晚期,不同的民族迁移到罗马帝国,包括在西半部和东半部。墓地考古学为中世纪早期社会历史提供了最重要的资料来源之一。不应将武器储藏排除在这一进程之外。目前的论文调查了在希腊塞萨洛尼基所谓的辛特里瓦尼大教堂的坟墓中发现的一名士兵的埋葬武器,该坟墓可追溯到公元5世纪初,以及对武器和盔甲的研究与其他考古发现如何帮助我们探索古代晚期的身份。在整个宝藏中,死者最有趣的武器是那把被发现弯曲的剑。这一引人注目的关键特征使我将其与“杀死武器”的仪式联系起来。弯曲的剑表达了关于地位和身份的复杂社会陈述,并作为线索表明士兵是“罗马化”的哥特人或来自另一个日耳曼部落,在罗马帝国军队中担任雇佣兵(foederatus)。考虑到埋葬地点的重要性,死者显然是罗马军队的高级军官。
{"title":"Investigating Identities in Late Antiquity: A Case Study of the Roman Weapons Burial Deposit from the Sintrivani Basilica in Thessaloniki","authors":"Errikos Maniotis","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912675","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The identification of “peoples” is the oldest purpose that the study of burial rites has been made to serve. Written sources tell us that in late antiquity different peoples migrated into the Roman Empire, both in the Western and in the Eastern half. Cemetery archaeology provides one of the most important sources for early medieval social history. Weapon deposits should not be excluded from this process. The current paper investigates the armament of a soldier’s burial found in a grave attached to the so-called Sintrivani Basilica in Thessaloniki, Greece, dated to the early fifth century CE and how the study of arms and armor combined with other archaeological findings could help us to explore identities in late antiquity. The most interesting weapon of the deceased from the whole hoard is the sword that had been found bent. This striking and critical feature led me to correlate it with the ritual of “killing a weapon.” The bent sword expresses complex social statements about status and identity and functions as a clue that the soldier was a “Romanized” Goth or from another Germanic tribe who served as a mercenary (foederatus) in the imperial Roman forces. Considering the importance of the burial location, it is also clear that the deceased was a high-ranking officer of the Roman army.","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms by Jessica Brantley (review) 杰西卡·布兰特利《中世纪手稿与文学形式》(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912683
Sally Elizabeth Tozer
Reviewed by: Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms by Jessica Brantley Sally Elizabeth Tozer Jessica Brantley, Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022), xiv + 346 pp., 25 ills. In Medieval English Manuscripts and Literary Forms, Jessica Brantley impresses upon fledgling medievalists the importance of understanding the distinctions between encountering modern print books and encountering medieval ones. She questions what it means to physically navigate a digital edition, versus a print edition, versus the manuscript artifact in its extant form, which is to consider not only the past life of the codex as a material artifact but also its future transmission in the form of a digital facsimile. Considered as such, the life of the manuscript book is a circular one. Finding its genesis in the technological advancements that precipitated the codex form, the manuscript book presages the organizations of language and data found in the modern print book, and, in turn, how digital “books”—laptops, tablets, smartphones, and e-readers—are visually organized and virtually navigated. Rather than imagining the field of manuscript studies as one ruptured by the proliferation of online facsimiles—in which one body of scholars, versed in a dying art of tactile research, stands in opposition to a newer cohort, literally and metaphorically unfeeling in their commitment to digitization—Brantley reminds readers of the contingency of material and virtual forms. It is for this reason, no doubt, that all of the case-study texts in her book are fully accessible online, equipped with borderline-nostalgic, page-turning features and enhanced with the ease of virtual navigation. The newfound accessibility of these landmark texts can further proliferate the practice of global medieval studies and renew appetites for manuscript investigation. In the first section of the book, a vocabulary that describes the physical features of the manuscript artifact is outlined, elucidating the later section’s “heuristic categories [which are] meant to be portable, not determinative” (115). In conjunction with the glossary, this section offers readers an arsenal of terminology, a series of keys by which the entrances to the codicological surface of the manuscript can be unlocked. These terms relate variously to material support (“the material upon which the text is inscribed” [323]); inks and pigments (lamp-black, iron gall, atramentum, lapis lazuli, scarlet kermes); paleographic scripts (calligraphic and cursive hands, Gothic, textura, secretary script); codex structure and layout (collation, binding, pricking, ruling); decoration, illumination, and illustration; as well as errors, absences, abbreviations, and editorial details. Each aspect partakes in the overall impression of the manuscript and each offers scholars ample material for interpretation, comparison, and analysis. Collectively, these terms furnish the reader’s mind with a too
杰西卡·布兰特利,《中世纪手稿和文学形式》(费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2022年),14 + 346页,25页。在《中世纪英语手稿和文学形式》一书中,杰西卡·布兰特利向初出茅茅台的中世纪学者强调了理解现代印刷书籍和中世纪书籍之间区别的重要性。她质疑在数字版本中,与印刷版相比,与现存形式的手稿工艺品相比,物理导航意味着什么,这不仅要考虑抄本过去的生活作为一种物质工艺品,还要考虑它未来以数字传真形式的传播。这样看来,手抄本的生命是循环的。手稿书的起源是技术进步促成的抄本形式,它预示着现代印刷书籍中语言和数据的组织,反过来,数字“书”——笔记本电脑、平板电脑、智能手机和电子阅读器——是如何在视觉上组织和虚拟导航的。布兰特利并没有把手稿研究领域想象成一个因在线传真的激增而破裂的领域——在这个领域里,一群精通触觉研究这门即将消亡的艺术的学者,站在另一群新学者的对立面,从字面上和隐喻上说,他们对数字化的承诺毫无感情——而是提醒读者材料和虚拟形式的偶然性。毫无疑问,正是出于这个原因,她书中所有的案例研究文本都可以在网上完全访问,配备了边界怀旧,翻页功能,并通过虚拟导航增强了易用性。这些具有里程碑意义的文本的新发现的可访问性可以进一步扩散全球中世纪研究的实践,并更新手稿调查的胃口。在书的第一部分中,描述了手稿的物理特征的词汇表,阐明了后面部分的“启发式类别(这些类别)意味着可移植,而不是决定性的”(115)。与词汇表一起,本节为读者提供了一个术语库,一系列钥匙,通过这些钥匙,可以解锁手稿的法典表面。这些术语与材料支持有不同的关系(“文本所依据的材料”[323]);油墨和颜料(灯黑、铁胆、白炭黑、青金石、猩红胭脂);古文字(书法和草书、哥特、纹理、书写体);手抄本结构及版式(整理、装订、扎针、整理);装饰、照明和插图;以及错误、缺失、缩写和编辑细节。每个方面都参与了手稿的整体印象,每个方面都为学者提供了充足的解释、比较和分析材料。总的来说,这些术语为读者提供了一个语言工具箱,使他们能够更精确地描述阅读、触摸和与手稿互动的多感官体验。因此,这个工具箱并不是纯粹的隐喻。布兰特利将人们的注意力引向了那些用来在中世纪手稿中填充字母、数字、音符和视觉文化的工具——手写笔、羊皮纸笔、羽毛笔、钢笔、铅笔芯、蜡笔。同时,她要求我们考虑手稿制作的亚视觉方面:即用于刮擦和调整文本的刀具;用锥子和刺针在书页上戳来戳去;手本身的特质,在广泛的典型文字的限制之外,提供了对“抄写员的表演精神”的洞察(316,ductus)。中世纪手抄本的材料合成远远超出了制作现代印刷书籍所必需的作者和出版商的修复,它依赖于多个工匠的综合工作,一个团队的合作努力经常分散在不同的时间、地点、语言和文化上。布兰特利强调了制作这些中世纪书籍的体力和智力劳动,提醒读者考虑这些手稿制作者的独立和合作角色。在某些情况下,这群作者、编纂者、注释者、润色者、注释者和抄写者确实有意地协调他们的活动,并在一个单独的缮写室或商业车间内执行他们的文本愿景;然而,在其他时刻,他们完全没有意识到他们的合作者,在相同的对开本上,多年,数十年,甚至数百年后,对文本进行了润色,编辑和添加。援引亚当……
{"title":"Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms by Jessica Brantley (review)","authors":"Sally Elizabeth Tozer","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912683","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms by Jessica Brantley Sally Elizabeth Tozer Jessica Brantley, Medieval Manuscripts and Literary Forms (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022), xiv + 346 pp., 25 ills. In Medieval English Manuscripts and Literary Forms, Jessica Brantley impresses upon fledgling medievalists the importance of understanding the distinctions between encountering modern print books and encountering medieval ones. She questions what it means to physically navigate a digital edition, versus a print edition, versus the manuscript artifact in its extant form, which is to consider not only the past life of the codex as a material artifact but also its future transmission in the form of a digital facsimile. Considered as such, the life of the manuscript book is a circular one. Finding its genesis in the technological advancements that precipitated the codex form, the manuscript book presages the organizations of language and data found in the modern print book, and, in turn, how digital “books”—laptops, tablets, smartphones, and e-readers—are visually organized and virtually navigated. Rather than imagining the field of manuscript studies as one ruptured by the proliferation of online facsimiles—in which one body of scholars, versed in a dying art of tactile research, stands in opposition to a newer cohort, literally and metaphorically unfeeling in their commitment to digitization—Brantley reminds readers of the contingency of material and virtual forms. It is for this reason, no doubt, that all of the case-study texts in her book are fully accessible online, equipped with borderline-nostalgic, page-turning features and enhanced with the ease of virtual navigation. The newfound accessibility of these landmark texts can further proliferate the practice of global medieval studies and renew appetites for manuscript investigation. In the first section of the book, a vocabulary that describes the physical features of the manuscript artifact is outlined, elucidating the later section’s “heuristic categories [which are] meant to be portable, not determinative” (115). In conjunction with the glossary, this section offers readers an arsenal of terminology, a series of keys by which the entrances to the codicological surface of the manuscript can be unlocked. These terms relate variously to material support (“the material upon which the text is inscribed” [323]); inks and pigments (lamp-black, iron gall, atramentum, lapis lazuli, scarlet kermes); paleographic scripts (calligraphic and cursive hands, Gothic, textura, secretary script); codex structure and layout (collation, binding, pricking, ruling); decoration, illumination, and illustration; as well as errors, absences, abbreviations, and editorial details. Each aspect partakes in the overall impression of the manuscript and each offers scholars ample material for interpretation, comparison, and analysis. Collectively, these terms furnish the reader’s mind with a too","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green (review) 重新思考古代德鲁伊:米兰达·奥尔德豪斯-格林的考古学视角(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678
Rachael Maxon
Reviewed by: Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green Rachael Maxon Miranda Aldhouse-Green, Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2021), xvii + 188 pp., 55 ills. The Druids have long stood as one of the great mysteries of the distant past. Faced with a lack of written records and scant archaeological remains, scholars have had to contend with the testimonies of late Greek and Roman writers, such as Julius Caesar, Lucan, Tacitus, Diodorus Siculus, and Cassius Dio, in order to understand these perplexing figures. Instead of accepting these foreign writers at face value, Aldhouse-Green critically engages with their testimonies and places them in context with the archaeological record in order to investigate the veracity of the ancient claims against the physical evidence. As a companion to Nora Chadwick’s 1966 monograph The Druids, Ald-house-Green’s Rethinking the Ancient Druids engages with recent archaeological excavations in Britain and Wales that show clear evidence of people with religious knowledge, that are associated with religious objects, or sites that show remains of organized ritual behavior. While Andrew Fitzpatrick also uses this approach of combining the textual and the archaeological record, Aldhouse-Green’s approach to who was considered a Druid is much broader and includes not only “those who called themselves Druids, but also those whose communities recognized them as such, as well as those who simply held religious knowledge and spiritual skills” (2). This broader definition allows her to attribute more archaeological material to the Druids. Rather than reanalyze old evidence with her new methodology, Aldhouse-Green uses the latest evidence from recent [End Page 200] archaeological investigations in Britain, Gaul, and Wales. She includes Wales even though it usually gets left out of traditional discourses, because she believes it has similar archaeological evidence to that of Britain and Gaul, and therefore should be included in discussions about the Druids, as she shows throughout the book. Two major arguments run throughout the book. The first is that the Druids may have left more traces of their existence in the archaeological record than we have come to believe. Aldhouse-Green believes that by shifting our perspectives on the available archaeological remains, we might find more traces of the Druids at sites across Britain and Wales. The second argument is that Wales had a “pivotal rather than peripheral role in a religious leadership usually portrayed as a primarily Gallic phenomenon” (3). This, she argues, can be seen once Welsh mythological texts such as the Mabinogion are combined with the Welsh archaeological record, a claim she supports primarily in chapter 5. By including the finds from Wales alongside those of Britain and Gaul, she argues that new patterns may emerge that shed light on the elusive Druids. The book
回顾:重新思考古代德鲁伊:考古视角由米兰达·奥尔德豪斯格林瑞秋·麦克森米兰达·奥尔德豪斯格林,重新思考古代德鲁伊:考古视角(加的夫:威尔士大学出版社,2021),17 + 188页,55页。德鲁伊教长期以来一直是远古时代的一大谜团。由于缺乏书面记录和考古遗迹,学者们不得不与晚期希腊和罗马作家的证词作斗争,如朱利叶斯·凯撒、卢坎、塔西佗、狄奥多罗斯·西库鲁斯和卡西乌斯·迪奥,以理解这些令人困惑的人物。奥尔德豪斯-格林没有从表面上接受这些外国作家,而是批判性地研究他们的证词,并将它们与考古记录联系起来,以调查古代主张与实物证据的真实性。作为诺拉·查德威克(Nora Chadwick) 1966年的专著《德鲁伊》(The Druids)的同伴,阿尔德豪斯·格林(Ald-house-Green)的《重新思考古代德鲁伊》(Rethinking The Ancient Druids)与最近在英国和威尔士的考古发掘有关,这些考古发掘显示了具有宗教知识的人的明确证据,这些人与宗教物品有关,或者显示有组织的仪式行为遗迹的遗址。安德鲁·菲茨帕特里克(Andrew Fitzpatrick)也使用了这种结合文本和考古记录的方法,而奥尔德豪斯·格林(Aldhouse-Green)的方法要广泛得多,不仅包括“那些自称德鲁伊的人,还包括那些社区承认他们的人,以及那些仅仅拥有宗教知识和精神技能的人”(2)。这种更广泛的定义使她能够将更多的考古材料归因于德鲁伊。奥尔德豪斯-格林没有用她的新方法重新分析旧证据,而是使用了最近在英国、高卢和威尔士进行的考古调查的最新证据。她把威尔士也包括了进来,尽管它通常被排除在传统的论述之外,因为她认为威尔士与不列颠和高卢有着相似的考古证据,因此应该被包括在关于德鲁伊教的讨论中,就像她在书中所展示的那样。两个主要论点贯穿全书。首先,德鲁伊教在考古记录中留下的存在痕迹可能比我们认为的要多。奥尔德豪斯-格林认为,通过改变我们对现有考古遗迹的看法,我们可能会在英国和威尔士各地发现更多德鲁伊教的痕迹。第二个论点是,威尔士“在宗教领导中扮演着关键而非次要的角色,通常被描绘为主要的高卢现象”(3)。她认为,一旦将威尔士神话文本(如《马比诺吉奥翁》)与威尔士考古记录结合起来,就可以看出这一点,她在第5章主要支持了这一观点。她认为,通过将威尔士的发现与英国和高卢的发现结合起来,可能会出现新的模式,从而揭示难以捉摸的德鲁伊。全书分为九章,按主题排列。奥尔德豪斯-格林将文本与考古发现巧妙地编织在一起,讨论了德鲁伊研究的一些主要领域,如宗教、祭祀、来世的意识形态、社会组织和艺术。尽管考古记录中的许多主题都是虚无缥缈的,但她仍然毫不畏惧地追求答案,为未来的研究提出了许多问题和可能性,以便在更多证据浮出水面时进行探索。奥尔德豪斯-格林通过回顾写德鲁伊教的古典作家开始了她的研究。她以这些作家作为分析的文本基础,每章开头都引用一段话来说明该章的主题。她在第一章开始讨论凯撒大帝,她在整本书中都离不开凯撒大帝。这是因为她相信他的描述是了解德鲁伊教的最可靠的方法之一,因为他在高卢待了近十年,并与可能是德鲁伊教的埃杜伊统治者迪维西亚库斯(Diviciacus)成为朋友。她继续介绍了其他作家,如卢坎和著名的奥古斯都历史学家,并将他们置于历史背景中,以便更好地理解他们对德鲁伊教的贡献。第二章质疑古典作家关于德鲁伊教的准确性。这一章不仅调查了这些作者对……的宗教性质和等级制度的看法。
{"title":"Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green (review)","authors":"Rachael Maxon","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green Rachael Maxon Miranda Aldhouse-Green, Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2021), xvii + 188 pp., 55 ills. The Druids have long stood as one of the great mysteries of the distant past. Faced with a lack of written records and scant archaeological remains, scholars have had to contend with the testimonies of late Greek and Roman writers, such as Julius Caesar, Lucan, Tacitus, Diodorus Siculus, and Cassius Dio, in order to understand these perplexing figures. Instead of accepting these foreign writers at face value, Aldhouse-Green critically engages with their testimonies and places them in context with the archaeological record in order to investigate the veracity of the ancient claims against the physical evidence. As a companion to Nora Chadwick’s 1966 monograph The Druids, Ald-house-Green’s Rethinking the Ancient Druids engages with recent archaeological excavations in Britain and Wales that show clear evidence of people with religious knowledge, that are associated with religious objects, or sites that show remains of organized ritual behavior. While Andrew Fitzpatrick also uses this approach of combining the textual and the archaeological record, Aldhouse-Green’s approach to who was considered a Druid is much broader and includes not only “those who called themselves Druids, but also those whose communities recognized them as such, as well as those who simply held religious knowledge and spiritual skills” (2). This broader definition allows her to attribute more archaeological material to the Druids. Rather than reanalyze old evidence with her new methodology, Aldhouse-Green uses the latest evidence from recent [End Page 200] archaeological investigations in Britain, Gaul, and Wales. She includes Wales even though it usually gets left out of traditional discourses, because she believes it has similar archaeological evidence to that of Britain and Gaul, and therefore should be included in discussions about the Druids, as she shows throughout the book. Two major arguments run throughout the book. The first is that the Druids may have left more traces of their existence in the archaeological record than we have come to believe. Aldhouse-Green believes that by shifting our perspectives on the available archaeological remains, we might find more traces of the Druids at sites across Britain and Wales. The second argument is that Wales had a “pivotal rather than peripheral role in a religious leadership usually portrayed as a primarily Gallic phenomenon” (3). This, she argues, can be seen once Welsh mythological texts such as the Mabinogion are combined with the Welsh archaeological record, a claim she supports primarily in chapter 5. By including the finds from Wales alongside those of Britain and Gaul, she argues that new patterns may emerge that shed light on the elusive Druids. The book ","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson (review) 主教Æthelwold、他的追随者和中世纪早期英格兰的圣徒崇拜:权力、信仰和宗教改革作者:艾莉森·哈德森
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912692
Benjamin Bertrand
Reviewed by: Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson Benjamin Bertrand Alison Hudson, Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2022), xvi + 293 pp., 10 ills. Alison Hudson’s first monograph, the latest volume in the Anglo-Saxon Studies series, is an ambitious work that aims to recontextualize the reforms of Bishop Æthelwold and his followers through a hagiographical lens. A specialist in early medieval England, Hudson has served as a Project Coordinator for Early Medieval English Manuscripts at the British Library and published extensively on this period. Her new book marshals her impressive command of the manuscript sources to reconsider how Æthelwold and his followers used the worship of saints to influence the laity and shore up their political and economic base. Hudson focuses on the bishop’s “circle,” whom she describes as “the men and women who staffed and/or were trained at the houses Æthelwold refounded … because they were conscious of their links to each other, identifying themselves as ‘alumni Æthelwoldi’” (3). Pushing back against scholars such as Eric John who argued that this group’s reforms were made possible only through royal backing, she argues that “they also … interacted and engaged with groups outside their monasteries, and thereby sought to gain others’ support” (225). Hudson analyzes how this circle carefully encouraged the veneration of certain saints to achieve their political and religious goals as part of their reform program. Using the introduction and first chapter to lay out the terms of her analysis and establish her historiographical intervention, Hudson suggests that Æthelwold and his circle’s choice of saints had more to do with constituencies outside the monastery than with monastic worship. She identifies three contexts for saintly veneration, which she describes as “‘individual,’ ‘intra-communal,’ and ‘supra-communal’” (18). Although the majority of the book focuses on the third category, Hudson does not discount the importance of the worship of saints by individual monks and monastic communities. Her first chapter considers veneration of saints in individual prayers and monastic life by considering their role in education and in daily readings, relying upon sources such as Æthelwold’s Regularis concordia. Hudson pushes back against previous scholarship that argued that the the circle focused primarily on the worship of local saints and especially those mentioned by the Venerable Bede. She argues instead that in individual and monastic spaces, the monks generally favored the same continental saints being worshipped in the Carolingian world. Accordingly, she notes that their use of local saints was instead an attempt to reach external audiences through “supra-communal” veneration. Hudson explains that this form of worship allowed
由:主教Æthelwold,他的追随者和中世纪早期英格兰的圣徒邪教:权力,信仰和宗教改革,作者:艾莉森·哈德森本杰明·伯特兰艾莉森·哈德森,主教Æthelwold,他的追随者和中世纪早期英格兰的圣徒邪教:权力,信仰和宗教改革(伍德布里奇:博伊德尔,2022),16 + 293页,10页。艾莉森·哈德森的第一部专著,最新卷在盎格鲁-撒克逊研究系列,是一个雄心勃勃的工作,旨在重新背景改革主教Æthelwold和他的追随者通过圣徒的镜头。哈德森是中世纪早期英国的专家,曾在大英图书馆担任中世纪早期英语手稿项目协调员,并在这一时期发表了大量文章。她的新书汇集了她对手稿来源的深刻掌握,重新思考Æthelwold和他的追随者如何利用对圣徒的崇拜来影响俗人,并巩固他们的政治和经济基础。哈德森专注于主教的“圈子”,她将这些人描述为“那些在修道院工作和/或接受过培训的男人和女人Æthelwold重建了……因为他们意识到彼此之间的联系,将自己视为‘校友Æthelwoldi’”(3)。埃里克·约翰(Eric John)等学者认为,这个团体的改革只有在王室的支持下才有可能实现,她反驳说,“他们也……与修道院外的团体互动和参与,从而寻求他人的支持”(225)。哈德森分析了这个圈子如何小心翼翼地鼓励对某些圣徒的崇拜,以实现他们的政治和宗教目标,作为他们改革计划的一部分。哈德森在引言和第一章中列出了她的分析术语,并确立了她的历史介入,她认为Æthelwold和他的圈子对圣徒的选择更多地与修道院之外的选民有关,而不是与修道院的崇拜有关。她确定了三种敬拜圣人的情境,她将其描述为“‘个人’、‘社区内’和‘超社区’”(18)。虽然这本书的大部分内容都集中在第三类,但哈德森并没有忽视个别僧侣和修道院团体崇拜圣人的重要性。她的第一章通过考虑他们在教育和日常阅读中的作用来考虑个人祈祷和修道院生活中的圣人崇拜,依靠Æthelwold的Regularis concordia等来源。哈德逊反驳了先前的学术观点,认为这个圈子主要集中在对当地圣徒的崇拜上,尤其是那些被尊者比德提到的人。相反,她认为,在个人和修道院的空间里,僧侣们通常更喜欢加洛林王朝崇拜的大陆圣人。因此,她指出,他们利用当地的圣人,反而是试图通过“超社区”崇拜来接触外部受众。哈德森解释说,这种形式的崇拜允许改革者通过诸如“礼仪庆典……翻译仪式、朝圣地朝圣和奇迹般的治愈”等活动来接触俗人(18)。通过广泛的书面资料和考古证据,她认为这进一步推进了他们的改革目标,并确保了他们的经济和财政安全。第二章和第三章探讨了教会对当地圣徒的选择是如何达到实际目的的。在大卫·罗拉森、斯蒂芬·怀特和芭芭拉·罗森韦恩的著作基础上,哈德森研究了他们的特许状,以考虑他们如何利用圣徒来吸引和保存礼物,依靠圣徒在危机时期“不死的地主”的角色。在评估阿宾顿和其他房屋时,她很快承认,与Æthelwold改革有关的社区领导人改变了他们对圣徒的使用,以适应每栋房屋的财产纠纷。哈德逊将此与他们更大的改革目标联系在一起,即建立修道院不受世俗影响的独立性。她进一步指出,对某些圣徒的超社区崇拜有助于改革者将未改革的神职人员的影响降至最低。虽然Æthelwold和他的追随者将不遵守本笃规则的神职人员驱逐出他们的社区,但许多人仍然对中世纪早期的英国社会产生了强大的影响。哈德逊认为,这个圈子鼓励了对当地圣徒的崇拜,并创造了圣徒传记和奇迹集,以维护这些神职人员的权威。他们利用了当地早已存在的邪教,比如圣斯威森。
{"title":"Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson (review)","authors":"Benjamin Bertrand","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912692","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson Benjamin Bertrand Alison Hudson, Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2022), xvi + 293 pp., 10 ills. Alison Hudson’s first monograph, the latest volume in the Anglo-Saxon Studies series, is an ambitious work that aims to recontextualize the reforms of Bishop Æthelwold and his followers through a hagiographical lens. A specialist in early medieval England, Hudson has served as a Project Coordinator for Early Medieval English Manuscripts at the British Library and published extensively on this period. Her new book marshals her impressive command of the manuscript sources to reconsider how Æthelwold and his followers used the worship of saints to influence the laity and shore up their political and economic base. Hudson focuses on the bishop’s “circle,” whom she describes as “the men and women who staffed and/or were trained at the houses Æthelwold refounded … because they were conscious of their links to each other, identifying themselves as ‘alumni Æthelwoldi’” (3). Pushing back against scholars such as Eric John who argued that this group’s reforms were made possible only through royal backing, she argues that “they also … interacted and engaged with groups outside their monasteries, and thereby sought to gain others’ support” (225). Hudson analyzes how this circle carefully encouraged the veneration of certain saints to achieve their political and religious goals as part of their reform program. Using the introduction and first chapter to lay out the terms of her analysis and establish her historiographical intervention, Hudson suggests that Æthelwold and his circle’s choice of saints had more to do with constituencies outside the monastery than with monastic worship. She identifies three contexts for saintly veneration, which she describes as “‘individual,’ ‘intra-communal,’ and ‘supra-communal’” (18). Although the majority of the book focuses on the third category, Hudson does not discount the importance of the worship of saints by individual monks and monastic communities. Her first chapter considers veneration of saints in individual prayers and monastic life by considering their role in education and in daily readings, relying upon sources such as Æthelwold’s Regularis concordia. Hudson pushes back against previous scholarship that argued that the the circle focused primarily on the worship of local saints and especially those mentioned by the Venerable Bede. She argues instead that in individual and monastic spaces, the monks generally favored the same continental saints being worshipped in the Carolingian world. Accordingly, she notes that their use of local saints was instead an attempt to reach external audiences through “supra-communal” veneration. Hudson explains that this form of worship allowed","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135710995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brokers of Salvation: Merchants and Missionaries in the Europeanization of the North, 800–1300 救赎的掮客:北方欧洲化中的商人和传教士,800-1300
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912670
Wesley Gaines
Abstract: The conventional narrative of the conversion of Scandinavia to Christianity depicts a top-down, mass conversion carried out by the monarchs of Scandinavian kingdoms. This paper adds to these analyses the preexisting economic relationship between trade towns of Latin Christendom with Scandinavia and the Baltic and credits this trade for carrying ideas and cultural norms to the region, as well as for establishing trade routes along which missionaries would follow in the footsteps of these merchants. It traces the establishment of official bishoprics and sees of the Latin Church in Scandinavian and Baltic trade towns as well as the adoption of distinctly European forms of social organization. It also lends agency to the people of Scandinavia themselves, adding to the narrative their understudied role in the process by crediting their chieftains with willfully and strategically importing Christianity for their own gain rather than depicting them as passive agents with change foisted upon them from the outside. The primary sources bear out not an immediate change, but a gradual one, carried out not by armies and kings, but by merchants and trades-men, clergy and chieftains in their daily interactions, which built up social networks, compiled social trust, and contagiously spread cultural norms.
摘要:传统的斯堪的纳维亚半岛皈依基督教的叙事描述了斯堪的纳维亚王国君主自上而下的大规模皈依。本文在这些分析的基础上补充了拉丁基督教世界的贸易城镇与斯堪的纳维亚和波罗的海之间先前存在的经济关系,并将这种贸易归功于向该地区传播思想和文化规范,以及建立传教士跟随这些商人脚步的贸易路线。它追溯了官方主教辖区的建立,看到了斯堪的纳维亚和波罗的海贸易城镇的拉丁教会,以及采用独特的欧洲社会组织形式。它也为斯堪的纳维亚人自己提供了代理,通过将他们的酋长归功于他们为了自己的利益而故意和战略性地引进基督教,而不是将他们描述为被动的代理人,将他们从外部强加给他们的变化,从而增加了他们在这一过程中未被充分研究的角色。原始资料表明,变化不是立即发生的,而是一个渐进的变化,不是由军队和国王进行的,而是由商人和商人、神职人员和酋长在他们的日常交往中进行的,他们建立了社会网络,建立了社会信任,并传染地传播了文化规范。
{"title":"Brokers of Salvation: Merchants and Missionaries in the Europeanization of the North, 800–1300","authors":"Wesley Gaines","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912670","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The conventional narrative of the conversion of Scandinavia to Christianity depicts a top-down, mass conversion carried out by the monarchs of Scandinavian kingdoms. This paper adds to these analyses the preexisting economic relationship between trade towns of Latin Christendom with Scandinavia and the Baltic and credits this trade for carrying ideas and cultural norms to the region, as well as for establishing trade routes along which missionaries would follow in the footsteps of these merchants. It traces the establishment of official bishoprics and sees of the Latin Church in Scandinavian and Baltic trade towns as well as the adoption of distinctly European forms of social organization. It also lends agency to the people of Scandinavia themselves, adding to the narrative their understudied role in the process by crediting their chieftains with willfully and strategically importing Christianity for their own gain rather than depicting them as passive agents with change foisted upon them from the outside. The primary sources bear out not an immediate change, but a gradual one, carried out not by armies and kings, but by merchants and trades-men, clergy and chieftains in their daily interactions, which built up social networks, compiled social trust, and contagiously spread cultural norms.","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The t4t Gift Economy and Its Romance within the Middle English Lai Sir Launfal 中古英语中的礼品经济及其浪漫史
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912671
Alice Fulmer
Abstract: Contemporary discourse around t4t (trans for trans) relationships involves speculation about bodies in transition. What do such relationships signify toward the bodies of compulsory heterosexuality, not just today, but in the historical record? In the case of the Middle English lai tradition, a t4t framework assists a postmodern audience in uncovering instances not only of gendered affects relative to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries but also of the affect economies that facilitate (or negate) gender affirmations. Romances such as Thomas Chestre’s Sir Launfal (a translation of a twelfth-century lai of Marie de France) exhibit romantic, platonic, and (the potentiality of) sexual relationships from which a semblance of t4t dynamics is constructively reassembled. Looking at some of the poem’s central characters and their relationships’ dynamics, both from Sir Launfal and from the larger “Lanval” tradition, provides a means from which t4t can be understood as a framework—one that measures not only affect between transgender individuals but also social systems like gift economies within the text that bear resemblance to contemporary mutual aid networks in transgender communities today. Instances of camp and parody within the romance genre historically are also observed in this paper. The gift economies in Sir Launfal and their gender affirmations propel the narrative’s resolution to demonstrate how they scaffold the genre of romance within the Middle English lai. This is an inquiry into exploring what focusing a distinctly trans lens can do when looking.
摘要:围绕t4t (trans for trans)关系的当代话语涉及对过渡中的身体的猜测。不仅在今天,而且在历史记录中,这种关系对强制性异性恋的身体意味着什么?以中古英语的lai传统为例,t4t框架不仅帮助后现代读者揭示了相对于14和15世纪的性别影响,而且还揭示了促进(或否定)性别肯定的影响经济。托马斯·切斯特(Thomas Chestre)的《朗法尔爵士》(Sir Launfal)(翻译自12世纪法国玛丽(Marie de France)的一首诗)等浪漫小说展现了浪漫的、柏拉图式的和(潜在的)性关系,从这些关系中,我们可以建设性地重新组装出一种表面上的动态。从朗法尔爵士和更大的“兰瓦尔”传统来看,这首诗的一些中心人物和他们之间的关系动态,提供了一种方法,可以将其理解为一个框架——一个不仅衡量跨性别个体之间的影响,而且衡量文本中的社会系统,如礼物经济,与当今跨性别社区的当代互助网络相似的社会系统。在历史上,本文还观察了浪漫主义流派中坎普和戏仿的例子。《劳法尔爵士》中的礼物经济和他们对性别的肯定推动了叙事的决心,以证明他们是如何在中古英语lai中支撑浪漫题材的。这是一个探究,探索聚焦一个明显的跨镜头可以做什么,当看。
{"title":"The t4t Gift Economy and Its Romance within the Middle English Lai Sir Launfal","authors":"Alice Fulmer","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912671","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Contemporary discourse around t4t (trans for trans) relationships involves speculation about bodies in transition. What do such relationships signify toward the bodies of compulsory heterosexuality, not just today, but in the historical record? In the case of the Middle English lai tradition, a t4t framework assists a postmodern audience in uncovering instances not only of gendered affects relative to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries but also of the affect economies that facilitate (or negate) gender affirmations. Romances such as Thomas Chestre’s Sir Launfal (a translation of a twelfth-century lai of Marie de France) exhibit romantic, platonic, and (the potentiality of) sexual relationships from which a semblance of t4t dynamics is constructively reassembled. Looking at some of the poem’s central characters and their relationships’ dynamics, both from Sir Launfal and from the larger “Lanval” tradition, provides a means from which t4t can be understood as a framework—one that measures not only affect between transgender individuals but also social systems like gift economies within the text that bear resemblance to contemporary mutual aid networks in transgender communities today. Instances of camp and parody within the romance genre historically are also observed in this paper. The gift economies in Sir Launfal and their gender affirmations propel the narrative’s resolution to demonstrate how they scaffold the genre of romance within the Middle English lai. This is an inquiry into exploring what focusing a distinctly trans lens can do when looking.","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia by Catherine E. Karkov (review) 想象盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰:乌托邦、异托邦、反托邦作者:凯瑟琳·e·卡尔科夫(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912693
Melissa X. Stevens
Reviewed by: Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia by Catherine E. Karkov Melissa X. Stevens Catherine E. Karkov, Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2020), vii + 272 pp., 11 ills. Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Dystopia, Heterotopia, by distinguished art historian Catherine E. Karkov, questions presumptions about “Anglo-Saxon” England and English claims to superiority that have resulted in centuries of violence. Karkov distinguishes between England, the literal location, and “Anglo-Saxon” England, a signifier onto which ideas about the place are projected. England has never had a single, monolithic ethnicity or culture; it has always been a heterogeneous place comprising multiple identities. Karkov argues that “Anglo-Saxon” England is a signpost onto which is mapped the identities, ideologies, “empty ideas and hierarchies that have emerged within Anglo-Saxonism” (26). This distinction enables her to separate the field of early [End Page 237] medieval studies from contemporary white supremacist groups that endorse racist, homophobic, and misogynist ideologies while misappropriating early medieval English and Viking myths, legends, objects, words, and symbols. The Angles and Saxons were two of the Germanic groups that migrated to England during and after the Roman occupation. Karkov frames the underlying argument by stipulating that people who populated early medieval England and came to be known collectively as the “Anglo-Saxons” viewed themselves—via a set of compelling origin myths—as a chosen people arriving in a promised land. These myths facilitated the denial and erasure of the violence they committed against the land’s original inhabitants, retelling these atrocities as supernaturally preordained. This cultural tendency repeated as the English colonized other parts of the world. Karkov’s critical theoretical analyses of several early medieval English texts utilize psychoanalytical and philosophical concepts of time and space, particularly utopia and its variants, dystopia, heterotopia, and retrotopia. She uses encryption to propose that the early English denied and erased the brutality of their origins while simultaneously perpetuating the illusion of superiority, enabling them to continue practicing invasion, usurpation, and settler colonialism. According to Karkov, they accomplished this via conceptions of utopia, a discontent with the present that leads to anticipating a different future. She examines the political and cultural implications of stories about “Anglo-Saxon” England that have hugely impacted early medieval English scholarship, creating the foundation for attitudes that endure, manifesting as gatekeeping in today’s politics, popular culture, and the academy. Karkov employs several theoretical concepts to address the idea of utopia underlying the construct of “Anglo-Saxon” England. She suggests that the idea of the uncanny can demonstrate how the En
《想象盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰:乌托邦、异托邦、反乌托邦》,作者:凯瑟琳·e·卡尔科夫,《想象盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰:乌托邦、异托邦、反乌托邦》(伍德布里奇:博伊德尔出版社,2020),vii + 272页,11卷。《想象盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰:乌托邦、反乌托邦、异托邦》由杰出的艺术史学家凯瑟琳·e·卡尔科夫著,质疑关于“盎格鲁-撒克逊”英格兰的假设,以及英国人声称的优越感,这些假设导致了几个世纪的暴力。卡尔科夫区分了英格兰和“盎格鲁-撒克逊”英格兰,前者是字面上的位置,后者是一个能指,关于这个地方的想法投射在它上面。英格兰从未有过单一的、单一的种族或文化;它一直是一个包含多种身份的异质之地。卡尔科夫认为,“盎格鲁-撒克逊”的英格兰是一个路标,它映射了盎格鲁-撒克逊主义中出现的身份、意识形态、“空洞的想法和等级制度”(26)。这种区别使她能够将早期中世纪研究领域与当代白人至上主义团体区分开来,这些团体支持种族主义、同性恋恐惧症和厌恶女性的意识形态,同时滥用早期中世纪英语和维京人的神话、传说、物品、文字和符号。盎格鲁人和撒克逊人是在罗马占领期间和之后迁移到英国的两个日耳曼群体。卡尔科夫的基本论点是,中世纪早期居住在英格兰的人,后来被统称为“盎格鲁-撒克逊人”,他们通过一系列令人信服的起源神话,将自己视为抵达应许之地的被选中的人。这些神话有助于否认和抹去他们对这片土地上的原始居民犯下的暴力行为,将这些暴行复述为超自然的宿命。这种文化趋势在英国殖民世界其他地区的过程中不断重复。卡尔科夫对几个早期中世纪英语文本的批判性理论分析利用了时间和空间的精神分析和哲学概念,特别是乌托邦及其变体,反乌托邦,异托邦和复古托邦。她用加密的方法提出,早期的英国人否认并抹去了他们起源的残暴,同时又延续了优越感的幻觉,使他们能够继续实施入侵、篡夺和殖民主义。根据Karkov的说法,他们通过乌托邦的概念实现了这一点,对现在的不满导致了对不同未来的预期。她研究了“盎格鲁-撒克逊”英格兰故事的政治和文化含义,这些故事对中世纪早期的英国学术产生了巨大影响,为持久的态度奠定了基础,在今天的政治、流行文化和学术界中表现为守门人。卡尔科夫运用了几个理论概念来阐述“盎格鲁-撒克逊”英格兰结构背后的乌托邦思想。她认为,“不可思议”的概念可以展示英国人如何强化他们的身份认同,以反对他们创造的奇特的“他者”。乌托邦的感知破坏——在这里被卡尔科夫定义为实际或想象的经验力量的丧失——导致了忧郁症,在精神分析术语中被定义为由于无法集体或个人哀悼损失而产生的,在比德和阿尔弗雷德的时代得到了证明,并继续在现代英语社会中,如美国和英国。第一章读阿尔弗雷德国王对他翻译的《牧者规则》的序言,作为一个乌托邦文本,它虚构了一个过去来构建一个想象中的乌托邦未来,根据定义,这个未来必须永远保持在地平线上。他对现状的极度不满导致了他建立一个语言和学习统一的英格兰的野心。根据卡尔科夫的说法,阿尔弗雷德的计划为未来的帝国主义扩张奠定了基础。阿尔弗雷德试图将英语定位为一种神圣的语言,高于所有其他语言,强化了一种在当代极右翼极端分子中仍然可以观察到的心态。卡尔科夫认为,阿尔弗雷德基于英国例外论的乌托邦理想也是反乌托邦的,因为其殖民战略通过“一种武器化的‘盎格鲁-撒克逊’(以白人和说英语的人的形式)霸权”为后来的帝国主义和民族主义形式奠定了基础(17)。第二章分析了八世纪诺森伯兰弗兰克斯棺材作为一个隐喻性的异托邦,其中包含一个代表“盎格鲁-撒克逊”英格兰的空白空间。米歇尔·福柯将异托邦定义为一个既属于社会领域又与之分离的地方。对卡尔科夫来说,《弗兰克棺材》“通过投射……
{"title":"Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia by Catherine E. Karkov (review)","authors":"Melissa X. Stevens","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912693","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia by Catherine E. Karkov Melissa X. Stevens Catherine E. Karkov, Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Heterotopia, Dystopia (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2020), vii + 272 pp., 11 ills. Imagining Anglo-Saxon England: Utopia, Dystopia, Heterotopia, by distinguished art historian Catherine E. Karkov, questions presumptions about “Anglo-Saxon” England and English claims to superiority that have resulted in centuries of violence. Karkov distinguishes between England, the literal location, and “Anglo-Saxon” England, a signifier onto which ideas about the place are projected. England has never had a single, monolithic ethnicity or culture; it has always been a heterogeneous place comprising multiple identities. Karkov argues that “Anglo-Saxon” England is a signpost onto which is mapped the identities, ideologies, “empty ideas and hierarchies that have emerged within Anglo-Saxonism” (26). This distinction enables her to separate the field of early [End Page 237] medieval studies from contemporary white supremacist groups that endorse racist, homophobic, and misogynist ideologies while misappropriating early medieval English and Viking myths, legends, objects, words, and symbols. The Angles and Saxons were two of the Germanic groups that migrated to England during and after the Roman occupation. Karkov frames the underlying argument by stipulating that people who populated early medieval England and came to be known collectively as the “Anglo-Saxons” viewed themselves—via a set of compelling origin myths—as a chosen people arriving in a promised land. These myths facilitated the denial and erasure of the violence they committed against the land’s original inhabitants, retelling these atrocities as supernaturally preordained. This cultural tendency repeated as the English colonized other parts of the world. Karkov’s critical theoretical analyses of several early medieval English texts utilize psychoanalytical and philosophical concepts of time and space, particularly utopia and its variants, dystopia, heterotopia, and retrotopia. She uses encryption to propose that the early English denied and erased the brutality of their origins while simultaneously perpetuating the illusion of superiority, enabling them to continue practicing invasion, usurpation, and settler colonialism. According to Karkov, they accomplished this via conceptions of utopia, a discontent with the present that leads to anticipating a different future. She examines the political and cultural implications of stories about “Anglo-Saxon” England that have hugely impacted early medieval English scholarship, creating the foundation for attitudes that endure, manifesting as gatekeeping in today’s politics, popular culture, and the academy. Karkov employs several theoretical concepts to address the idea of utopia underlying the construct of “Anglo-Saxon” England. She suggests that the idea of the uncanny can demonstrate how the En","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas by Harriet J. Evans Tang (review) 中世纪冰岛的动物与人的关系:从农场定居到传奇
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912688
Amanda Coate
Reviewed by: Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas by Harriet J. Evans Tang Amanda Coate Harriet J. Evans Tang, Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022), 258 pp., 14 ills. In Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland, Harriet J. Evans Tang examines interactions between humans and other animals in medieval Iceland. Evans Tang approaches this topic using multiple disciplines and a variety of sources (including literature, legal texts, and archaeological evidence), and illustrates the numerous ways in which animals participated in and influenced Icelandic society [End Page 225] and culture. Chapter 1 considers the roles of domestic animals in the settlement of Iceland during the late ninth and early tenth centuries. It employs archaeological evidence, the Landnámabók (a work that describes the settlement of Iceland, the oldest surviving copies of which date to the thirteenth century), and selected Íslendingasögur (sagas of Icelanders, likely compiled between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries but containing narratives set several centuries earlier). Evans Tang argues that Iceland underwent a “co-settlement” dependent on “mutual care and cooperation, and the apparent mediatory role of animals between humans and their new land” (23). The Landnámabók and sagas depicted animals—sometimes in the guise of paranormal entities such as “land-spirits,” other times as more naturalistic animals—as variously aiding settlers by leading them to desirable land, escaping settlers’ control to form their own communities, and hindering settlers’ prosperity. This shared animal-human process of settlement led to shared animal-human living spaces, and chapter 2 discusses archaeological findings of potential animal-buildings at two Viking Age sites: Vatnsfjörður in the Westfjords and Sveigakot in northern Iceland. Drawing on archaeologist Kristin Armstrong Oma’s concept of animal-human “meeting points” and spatial analysis techniques, Evans Tang demonstrates how settlers built in response to the needs of domestic animals and how the organization of farmsteads might have impacted the daily interactions between animals and humans that occurred there. One avenue of research that might be explored further is Evans Tang’s hypothesis that the compilers of the Landnámabók and the sagas sought to depict a version of Icelandic settlement that “create[d] longevity for ideas of Icelanders as responsible farmers” (50). That is, these textual sources emphasized Icelanders’ interactions with domestic animals and their importance to settlement. However, Evans Tang notes that some archaeologists have recently proposed that the earliest settlement of Iceland was motivated by walrus-hunting. If this turns out to be the case, what would have been the cultural impacts of such a shift from walrus-hunting, which implies a close entanglement with animals in the wilderness, to an
《中世纪冰岛的动物-人类关系:从农场-定居到传奇》,作者:哈里特·j·埃文斯·唐,阿曼达·科特。哈里特·j·埃文斯·唐,《中世纪冰岛的动物-人类关系:从农场-定居到传奇》(伍德布里奇:D. S. Brewer, 2022), 258页,14卷。在《中世纪冰岛的动物与人的关系》一书中,哈里特·j·埃文斯·唐考察了中世纪冰岛人类与其他动物之间的互动。Evans Tang使用多个学科和各种来源(包括文学、法律文本和考古证据)来研究这个主题,并说明了动物参与和影响冰岛社会和文化的多种方式。第一章考虑了9世纪末和10世纪初冰岛定居期间家畜的角色。它采用了考古证据,Landnámabók(一本描述冰岛定居点的著作,现存最古老的副本可以追溯到13世纪),并选择了Íslendingasögur(冰岛人的传奇,可能编纂于13至15世纪之间,但包含了几个世纪前的叙述)。Evans Tang认为,冰岛经历了一种“共同定居”,依赖于“相互照顾和合作,以及动物在人类和他们的新土地之间明显的中介作用”(23)。Landnámabók和传说描述了动物——有时伪装成超自然的实体,如“土地之灵”,有时则是更自然的动物——通过各种方式帮助定居者,引导他们到达理想的土地,逃离定居者的控制,形成自己的社区,阻碍定居者的繁荣。这种共同的动物-人类定居过程导致了动物-人类共同的生活空间,第二章讨论了两个维京时代遗址的潜在动物建筑的考古发现:西峡湾的Vatnsfjörður和冰岛北部的Sveigakot。利用考古学家Kristin Armstrong Oma关于动物与人类“交汇点”的概念和空间分析技术,Evans Tang展示了定居者是如何根据家畜的需求而建造的,以及农场的组织可能如何影响了那里动物与人类之间的日常互动。一种可能被进一步探索的研究途径是Evans Tang的假设,即Landnámabók和传奇故事的编写者试图描绘一种“使冰岛人成为负责任的农民的观念长久存在”的冰岛定居点版本(50)。也就是说,这些文献资料强调了冰岛人与家畜的互动以及它们对定居的重要性。然而,Evans Tang指出,一些考古学家最近提出,冰岛最早的定居点是由海象狩猎引起的。如果事实证明是这样的话,那么从猎杀海象(这意味着与野生动物的密切联系)到畜牧业的这种转变会产生什么文化影响呢?第三章将从考古证据转移到研究冰岛法律,这些法律被统称为Grágás,它们从13世纪的手稿中幸存下来,被认为代表了至少可以追溯到11世纪的法律传统。Evans Tang概述了有关牛、马、羊等家畜的众多规定,并认为动物在这些法律中既是客体又是主体。他们是有价值的商品和工人,对他们的伤害和虐待将根据罪行受到各种惩罚,包括较轻的流放(三年流放)。应受惩罚的虐待也不仅限于故意致残或盗窃等行为;它还包括对动物的不当照顾和使用,例如以伤害它们的方式放牧或不小心骑别人的马。法律强调要负责任地对待家畜,即使是属于别人家的。与此同时,法律也承认动物可能对财产和人造成损害。例如,如果牛或猪杀了人,而且没有确定是饲养者的错,他们就会像人一样受到惩罚。或者,如果动物在某些情况下造成财产损失(例如,在它们的身体上没有所有权的标志),它们可以被杀死而不受惩罚。因此,动物有法律保护,但也可能失去这些保护……
{"title":"Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas by Harriet J. Evans Tang (review)","authors":"Amanda Coate","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912688","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas by Harriet J. Evans Tang Amanda Coate Harriet J. Evans Tang, Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland: From Farm-Settlement to Sagas (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2022), 258 pp., 14 ills. In Animal-Human Relationships in Medieval Iceland, Harriet J. Evans Tang examines interactions between humans and other animals in medieval Iceland. Evans Tang approaches this topic using multiple disciplines and a variety of sources (including literature, legal texts, and archaeological evidence), and illustrates the numerous ways in which animals participated in and influenced Icelandic society [End Page 225] and culture. Chapter 1 considers the roles of domestic animals in the settlement of Iceland during the late ninth and early tenth centuries. It employs archaeological evidence, the Landnámabók (a work that describes the settlement of Iceland, the oldest surviving copies of which date to the thirteenth century), and selected Íslendingasögur (sagas of Icelanders, likely compiled between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries but containing narratives set several centuries earlier). Evans Tang argues that Iceland underwent a “co-settlement” dependent on “mutual care and cooperation, and the apparent mediatory role of animals between humans and their new land” (23). The Landnámabók and sagas depicted animals—sometimes in the guise of paranormal entities such as “land-spirits,” other times as more naturalistic animals—as variously aiding settlers by leading them to desirable land, escaping settlers’ control to form their own communities, and hindering settlers’ prosperity. This shared animal-human process of settlement led to shared animal-human living spaces, and chapter 2 discusses archaeological findings of potential animal-buildings at two Viking Age sites: Vatnsfjörður in the Westfjords and Sveigakot in northern Iceland. Drawing on archaeologist Kristin Armstrong Oma’s concept of animal-human “meeting points” and spatial analysis techniques, Evans Tang demonstrates how settlers built in response to the needs of domestic animals and how the organization of farmsteads might have impacted the daily interactions between animals and humans that occurred there. One avenue of research that might be explored further is Evans Tang’s hypothesis that the compilers of the Landnámabók and the sagas sought to depict a version of Icelandic settlement that “create[d] longevity for ideas of Icelanders as responsible farmers” (50). That is, these textual sources emphasized Icelanders’ interactions with domestic animals and their importance to settlement. However, Evans Tang notes that some archaeologists have recently proposed that the earliest settlement of Iceland was motivated by walrus-hunting. If this turns out to be the case, what would have been the cultural impacts of such a shift from walrus-hunting, which implies a close entanglement with animals in the wilderness, to an","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture by Sara Petrosillo (review) 《霍金女人:中世纪文学文化中的鹰猎、性别与控制》莎拉·彼得罗西略著(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912701
Leslie S. Jacoby
Reviewed by: Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture by Sara Petrosillo Leslie S. Jacoby Sara Petrosillo, Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2023), 200 pp., 11 ills. In Hawking Women, Sara Petrosillo presents an ambitious summation and analysis of recent scholarship on medieval falconry and its feminine and literary culture as intertwined motifs, protagonists, narratives, and aesthetics. She broaches this from medieval poetics, premodern feminist theories, animal studies, avian treatises and household conduct books, sigillographic iconography, the mal mariée, and more. Each chapter is entitled with an element of falconry as a measurable metaphoric structural construct; upon these, she connects context of scientific treatises, several canzoni, well-known and lesser-known lais, an Old French dit, and Chaucerian works. These varied works are examined for their control poetics, to parallel the art of training hawks, misogynistic feminine submission, contemporary and modern reading practices, and bygone medieval falconry practicum and its influence over the social status of women, who may have participated in hunting arts and their literary presentation of such. Petrosillo acknowledges her analysis stems largely from an ecofeminist apparatus, which aims to understand feminine intimacy between woman and her avian charge as means to immerse a paradoxical crossing of cultural practices and aesthetic poetic narratives. In “Control,” Petrosillo explores De arte venandi cum avibus, and other [End Page 257] significant avian treatises, to broach falconry practices as contradictory constructs for theorizing textual narratives. Petrosillo redresses previous scholars who have treated the same medieval source materials (falconry practicum) and relays a foundational argument informing her book. The Frederician context of medieval falconry practices function as an artform, one requiring knowledge and active apprenticeship experience. Frederick’s treatise contributes substantially to early ornithological science and aestheticizes falconry ars as one of the seven liberal arts. Frederick credits his courtier-falconer-poet(s) as skilled scientists and translators (Rinaldo d’Aquino, Jacopo Mostacci, Theodore of Antioch, Michael Scot), embracing essential elements from Arabic falconry practices. Petrosillo looks at ars venandi (hunting arts) and ars poetica following the Arabic ṭardiyyah genre and its incorporation of birds in flight as a poetic bravura form. In “Release,” Petrosillo examines gender roles in hawking imagery in poetics and material artifacts as forms of self-identity, self-representation, and self-authority. She uses “Tapina in me” to consider the rise of Sicilian poetry as reflective of medieval modes of representation, as a kind of feminine control over release and recapture. Underscoring the thirteenth-century limited understanding of r
《霍金女人:中世纪文学文化中的猎鹰、性别和控制》,作者:萨拉·彼得罗西略莱斯利·s·雅各比·萨拉·彼得罗西略,《霍金女人:中世纪文学文化中的猎鹰、性别和控制》(哥伦布:俄亥俄州立大学出版社,2023年),200页,11页。在《霍金女人》一书中,萨拉·彼得罗西略对中世纪猎鹰及其女性文化与文学文化交织在一起的主题、主角、叙事和美学进行了雄心勃勃的总结和分析。她从中世纪诗学、前现代女权主义理论、动物研究、鸟类论文和家庭行为书籍、象形文字肖像学、mal mariacime等方面入手。每一章的标题都有一个猎鹰元素作为一个可测量的隐喻结构结构;在此基础上,她将科学论文的背景、一些canzoni、知名的和不太知名的lais、古法国的dit和乔叟的作品联系起来。这些不同的作品被考察为它们的控制诗学,与训练鹰的艺术、厌恶女性的女性服从、当代和现代的阅读实践、过去的中世纪猎鹰实践及其对女性社会地位的影响平行,她们可能参与了狩猎艺术及其文学表现。Petrosillo承认她的分析很大程度上源于生态女性主义的工具,其目的是理解女性和她的鸟类之间的女性亲密关系,作为一种沉浸在文化实践和美学诗意叙事的矛盾交叉中的手段。在《控制》一书中,Petrosillo探讨了De arte venandi cum avibus和其他重要的鸟类论文,将猎鹰实践作为理论化文本叙事的矛盾结构。Petrosillo纠正了之前的学者处理过同样的中世纪原始材料(鹰猎实习),并传达了一个基本的论点,为她的书提供了信息。在弗雷德里西亚,中世纪的猎鹰实践是一种艺术形式,需要知识和积极的学徒经验。弗雷德里克的论文对早期鸟类学做出了重大贡献,并将鹰猎作为七门文科之一进行了审美化。弗雷德里克认为,他的侍臣、驯鹰诗人是熟练的科学家和翻译(里纳尔多·达基诺、雅各布·莫斯塔奇、安提阿克的西奥多、迈克尔·斯科特),他们接受了阿拉伯驯鹰实践的基本元素。Petrosillo着眼于ars venandi(狩猎艺术)和ars poetica,遵循阿拉伯语ṭardiyyah流派,并将飞行中的鸟类作为诗歌的勇敢形式结合起来。在《释放》一书中,彼得罗西略考察了诗学和物质制品中作为自我认同、自我表现和自我权威形式的贩卖意象中的性别角色。她用《Tapina in me》来思考西西里诗歌的兴起是中世纪表现模式的反映,是一种女性对释放和重新获得的控制。彼得罗西略考察了无名叙述者和她的爱人被抛弃的经历,强调了13世纪对两性异形的有限理解,即天生更大的女性水龙头胜过男性雄鹰。Petrosillo将十四行诗的结构定位为矛盾的结构,八度和设置,以配合一种猎鹰的幻想,认为十四行诗中使用的鸟是挣扎着对自由的渴望但又生活在驯化约束下的雌性。Petrosillo用男性声音的十四行诗“Vis’amoros”来平衡“Tapina”,分析了上下文,诗学和意象,以科学论文提供了持有和管理(处理)鸟类的指导,以支持这种猎鹰的幻想。Petrosillo将女性驯鹰人的象形文字图像作为女性权威的证据。她质疑我们是否能理解男性驯鹰者训练女鹰的二元解释,指出这些静态图像混淆了真正的女性视角及其在男女等级制度中的地位。在《围城》中,一部13世纪的杂集被用来比较/对比连续的作品:盎格鲁-诺曼诗歌翻译的《阿维布斯·特拉图斯》和玛丽·德·弗朗斯的《序言》和《约涅克》。Petrosillo在诗歌形式和语境中建立了捕获的鹰的重要共同意义,作为导致语境减少的矛盾形式。彼得罗西略用这些作品的物理位置作为推理,猎鹰特别适合玛丽的诗学。作者和读者之间固有的紧张关系始于《尤涅克》中无名的女主人公,她在塔式监狱中的解释性囚禁,以及她与一位名叫Muldumarec的鹰派骑士的相遇,后者帮助她挣脱束缚,并生下了一个名叫尤涅克的儿子。所有这些都揭示了玛丽所倡导的冒险和诗歌中圈地功能概念的更深层次的美学……
{"title":"Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture by Sara Petrosillo (review)","authors":"Leslie S. Jacoby","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912701","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture by Sara Petrosillo Leslie S. Jacoby Sara Petrosillo, Hawking Women: Falconry, Gender, and Control in Medieval Literary Culture (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2023), 200 pp., 11 ills. In Hawking Women, Sara Petrosillo presents an ambitious summation and analysis of recent scholarship on medieval falconry and its feminine and literary culture as intertwined motifs, protagonists, narratives, and aesthetics. She broaches this from medieval poetics, premodern feminist theories, animal studies, avian treatises and household conduct books, sigillographic iconography, the mal mariée, and more. Each chapter is entitled with an element of falconry as a measurable metaphoric structural construct; upon these, she connects context of scientific treatises, several canzoni, well-known and lesser-known lais, an Old French dit, and Chaucerian works. These varied works are examined for their control poetics, to parallel the art of training hawks, misogynistic feminine submission, contemporary and modern reading practices, and bygone medieval falconry practicum and its influence over the social status of women, who may have participated in hunting arts and their literary presentation of such. Petrosillo acknowledges her analysis stems largely from an ecofeminist apparatus, which aims to understand feminine intimacy between woman and her avian charge as means to immerse a paradoxical crossing of cultural practices and aesthetic poetic narratives. In “Control,” Petrosillo explores De arte venandi cum avibus, and other [End Page 257] significant avian treatises, to broach falconry practices as contradictory constructs for theorizing textual narratives. Petrosillo redresses previous scholars who have treated the same medieval source materials (falconry practicum) and relays a foundational argument informing her book. The Frederician context of medieval falconry practices function as an artform, one requiring knowledge and active apprenticeship experience. Frederick’s treatise contributes substantially to early ornithological science and aestheticizes falconry ars as one of the seven liberal arts. Frederick credits his courtier-falconer-poet(s) as skilled scientists and translators (Rinaldo d’Aquino, Jacopo Mostacci, Theodore of Antioch, Michael Scot), embracing essential elements from Arabic falconry practices. Petrosillo looks at ars venandi (hunting arts) and ars poetica following the Arabic ṭardiyyah genre and its incorporation of birds in flight as a poetic bravura form. In “Release,” Petrosillo examines gender roles in hawking imagery in poetics and material artifacts as forms of self-identity, self-representation, and self-authority. She uses “Tapina in me” to consider the rise of Sicilian poetry as reflective of medieval modes of representation, as a kind of feminine control over release and recapture. Underscoring the thirteenth-century limited understanding of r","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135711237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1