首页 > 最新文献

COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES最新文献

英文 中文
Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art ed. by Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene (review) 巴尔萨扎:中世纪和文艺复兴时期的非洲黑人国王克里斯汀·柯林斯和布莱恩·c·基恩主编(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912685
Caitlin Irene Dimartino
Reviewed by: Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art ed. by Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene Caitlin Irene Dimartino Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene, eds., Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art (Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2023), xiii + 152 pp., 121 ills. In his introduction to Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art, Henry Louis Gates Jr. aptly acknowledges the “enormous symbolic weight” that Black subjects have borne in the history of European art (xii). His observation is particularly applicable to representations of the biblical figure Balthazar, one of three kings present at the birth of Christ who, beginning in the late fifteenth century and continuing over the course of the early modern period, was increasingly understood in European visual culture, theological texts, and popular imagination as a Black king from the African continent. Building from a 2019 exhibition at the Getty Center in Los Angeles, Balthazar: A Black African King in Renaissance Art does more than simply chart racialization of a Christian holy figure across time. This text brings together manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, textiles, and portable objects to illustrate the interconnectedness of Africa and Europe and the dramatic impact of African diplomats, pilgrims, and missionaries on European audiences before and up through the onset of the slave trade. As the fulcrum around which the objects are organized, artistic interpretations of Balthazar reflect the absolute multiculturalism and plethora of exchange and [End Page 218] interchange between Africa and other parts of the world, while the shifting representation of Balthazar’s ethnicity, accoutrements, dress, or entourage registered fluctuating and multitudinous reactions to African sovereignty, piety, diplomacy, and subjection from a European perspective. As such, the text offers an alternative to the more common narratives of Blackness and Christianity through a binary model, where Black skin is relegated either to sinfulness, ethnography, and paganism or to purely positive representations of holy figures. The book’s three sections each begin with thematic overviews by the editors followed by focused essays from specialists on African art of Ethiopia, Nubia, West Africa, as well as of Europe and the African diaspora. This range of expertise speaks to the expansiveness of the theme of the Black Magus in premodern visual culture, as well as to the interconnectedness of Africa and Europe long before the “discovery” by the Portuguese on the Gold Coast in the sixteenth century. Sections are punctuated by “in focus” texts on language, memory, diaspora, and contemporary art, and the book closes with an essay by Tyree Boyd-Pates, a consultant to the project, who addresses the importance of telling a broader history of the early modern world that includes agency for people of African descent and that elevates Black subjects, especially in
评审:巴尔萨扎:中世纪和文艺复兴艺术中的非洲黑人国王,克里斯汀·柯林斯和布莱恩·c·基恩主编,凯特琳·艾琳·迪马蒂诺,克里斯汀·柯林斯和布莱恩·c·基恩主编。,巴尔萨泽:中世纪和文艺复兴艺术中的非洲黑人国王(洛杉矶:J.保罗·盖蒂博物馆,2023年),13 + 152页,121页。在他对巴尔萨泽的介绍中:作为中世纪和文艺复兴时期艺术中的非洲黑人国王,小亨利·路易斯·盖茨恰当地承认黑人在欧洲艺术史上所承担的“巨大的象征性重量”。他的观察特别适用于圣经人物巴尔萨泽的表现,巴尔萨泽是基督诞生时出现的三位国王之一,从15世纪后期开始,一直持续到现代早期。在欧洲的视觉文化、神学文本和大众想象中逐渐被理解为来自非洲大陆的黑人国王。2019年在洛杉矶盖蒂中心举办的展览《巴尔萨泽:文艺复兴时期的非洲黑人国王》不仅仅是简单地描绘了一个基督教神圣人物在不同时期的种族化。这本书汇集了手稿、绘画、雕塑、纺织品和便携式物品,以说明非洲和欧洲的相互联系,以及非洲外交官、朝圣者和传教士在奴隶贸易开始之前和之后对欧洲观众的巨大影响。作为这些物品组织的支点,对Balthazar的艺术诠释反映了绝对的多元文化主义,以及非洲与世界其他地区之间的大量交流和交流,而Balthazar的种族、服装、服装或随从的变化表现,从欧洲的角度记录了对非洲主权、虔诚、外交和臣服的波动和众多反应。因此,文本通过二元模型为黑人和基督教更常见的叙述提供了另一种选择,其中黑人皮肤被降级为罪恶,人种学和异教,或者纯粹是神圣人物的积极代表。这本书的三个部分,每开始的主题概述由编辑,然后集中的文章,从专家对非洲艺术埃塞俄比亚,努比亚,西非,以及欧洲和非洲侨民。这种专业知识的范围说明了前现代视觉文化中黑魔法师主题的广泛性,以及早在16世纪葡萄牙人在黄金海岸“发现”之前非洲和欧洲的相互联系。书的各个部分都穿插着关于语言、记忆、散居和当代艺术的“焦点”文本,书的结尾是该项目的顾问蒂里·博伊德-佩茨(Tyree Boyd-Pates)的一篇文章,他强调了讲述更广泛的早期现代世界历史的重要性,包括为非洲人后裔提供代理,并提升黑人主题,尤其是在面向公众的项目中,如面向多种受众的展览和文本。第一部分为拉丁基督教文化想象中的种族发展奠定了基础。从21世纪初开始,艺术家们经常通过代理人来描绘圣经人物的黑人形象,即一个非洲侍者或仆人会陪伴一个浅肤色的巴尔萨泽或示巴女王。对黑皮肤法师的描绘开始于15世纪后期。保罗·卡普兰(Paul Kaplan)描绘了圣像学从日耳曼地区传播到意大利和欧洲其他地区的过程,与此同时,三贤士的受欢迎程度和对他们的崇拜程度也普遍上升。杰拉尔丁·亨的文章同样追溯了黑色的波动含义从罪恶的象征到对表皮种族的更字面的描述。亨提出,在巴尔萨泽身上使用的黑色颜料,就像黑色的圣莫里斯一样,可以象征性地将站在他们的肖像前的白人基督徒观众的内在罪恶具体化。虽然黑色可以象征救赎或皈依的起点,但艺术家们也用肤色来表达宗教差异或与穆斯林或犹太人有关的负面品质,正如侯赛因·范西在他关于伊比利亚半岛多教派景观和卡斯蒂利亚阿方索十世宫廷艺术作品的章节中所展示的那样。下一节将重点转移到商业、贸易、朝圣和外交网络,这些网络将……
{"title":"Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art ed. by Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene (review)","authors":"Caitlin Irene Dimartino","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912685","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art ed. by Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene Caitlin Irene Dimartino Kristen Collins and Bryan C. Keene, eds., Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art (Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2023), xiii + 152 pp., 121 ills. In his introduction to Balthazar: A Black African King in Medieval and Renaissance Art, Henry Louis Gates Jr. aptly acknowledges the “enormous symbolic weight” that Black subjects have borne in the history of European art (xii). His observation is particularly applicable to representations of the biblical figure Balthazar, one of three kings present at the birth of Christ who, beginning in the late fifteenth century and continuing over the course of the early modern period, was increasingly understood in European visual culture, theological texts, and popular imagination as a Black king from the African continent. Building from a 2019 exhibition at the Getty Center in Los Angeles, Balthazar: A Black African King in Renaissance Art does more than simply chart racialization of a Christian holy figure across time. This text brings together manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, textiles, and portable objects to illustrate the interconnectedness of Africa and Europe and the dramatic impact of African diplomats, pilgrims, and missionaries on European audiences before and up through the onset of the slave trade. As the fulcrum around which the objects are organized, artistic interpretations of Balthazar reflect the absolute multiculturalism and plethora of exchange and [End Page 218] interchange between Africa and other parts of the world, while the shifting representation of Balthazar’s ethnicity, accoutrements, dress, or entourage registered fluctuating and multitudinous reactions to African sovereignty, piety, diplomacy, and subjection from a European perspective. As such, the text offers an alternative to the more common narratives of Blackness and Christianity through a binary model, where Black skin is relegated either to sinfulness, ethnography, and paganism or to purely positive representations of holy figures. The book’s three sections each begin with thematic overviews by the editors followed by focused essays from specialists on African art of Ethiopia, Nubia, West Africa, as well as of Europe and the African diaspora. This range of expertise speaks to the expansiveness of the theme of the Black Magus in premodern visual culture, as well as to the interconnectedness of Africa and Europe long before the “discovery” by the Portuguese on the Gold Coast in the sixteenth century. Sections are punctuated by “in focus” texts on language, memory, diaspora, and contemporary art, and the book closes with an essay by Tyree Boyd-Pates, a consultant to the project, who addresses the importance of telling a broader history of the early modern world that includes agency for people of African descent and that elevates Black subjects, especially in ","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight (review) 《蛇怪与贝奥武夫:盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的怪物》作者:Tim Flight
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689
Scott Royle
Reviewed by: Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight Scott Royle Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World (London: Reaktion, 2021), 262 pp., 20 ills. The first book by author Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World, is a look into the various diabolic creatures that shared the land with the Anglo-Saxon peoples of medieval Britain. Flight presents a clear investigation of the origins, social utility, and Christian adoption of the various creatures that were said to plague the lands of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, including wolves, dragons, demons, and humanoids. The author takes special care to evidence how these monsters, and their homes, still influence our misunderstandings of the “other” and an ongoing weariness of the wild. After a very concise introduction, which includes pertinent historical remarks on Anglo-Saxon history, Flight’s first chapter, “The Map of Monsters,” geographically situates the coming chapters by providing an overview of the locations and habitations of monsters through both Graeco-Roman and Old English textual references, notably from The Wonders of the East, The Letters of Alexander to Aristotle, and the Liber monstrorum. It is in this section that the author demonstrates that a clear division between a civilized and uncivilized world existed in the cultures that influenced the Anglo-Saxons and that they readily adopted this division. As evidenced in their own writings, monsters were as much a part of the scenery for the Anglo-Saxons as any other natural wonder with “monsters [forming] part of the natural fauna of uncivilized places at the edge of the world” (61). In chapter 2, “Of Wolf and Man,” and chapter 3, “Hic Sunt Dracones,” Flight considers two of the most persistent monsters in the Anglo-Saxon world: the wolf and the dragon. Of the wolf, the author attests that the obvious nuisance of its preying upon the livestock of Anglo-Saxon farmers, combined with the viciousness of its attack, produced a supernatural fear of the animal. Despite the wolf’s acting within its own nature, the specimen was not only deemed a monster in the natural sense but one in opposition to that which is holy, with Flight saying that for this reason, “the wolf is both a monster and a diabolic creature” (73), one that dares defy the sanctity of God’s most innocent creations. While there is no evidence that dragons ever existed, Flight demonstrates in the next chapter that in the Anglo-Saxon world they were a very real fear and cited in numerous Old English texts. The author proposes that the perplexity of the dragon lends to its use as a device of otherness that encouraged a continued division between civilized and uncivilized lands, saying that “the dragon is able to fulfil [its] symbolic role because it is a monster of the pagan wilderness” (102). Ingrained into the mythology of the dragon is its greed, with many stories commenting on its lust for attainin
由:蛇怪和贝奥武夫:怪物在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界由蒂姆飞行斯科特罗伊蒂姆飞行,蛇怪和贝奥武夫:怪物在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界(伦敦:反应,2021年),262页,20病。作者Tim Flight的第一本书,《蛇怪和贝奥武夫:盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的怪物》,是对中世纪英国盎格鲁-撒克逊人共享土地的各种恶魔生物的研究。《飞行》一书清晰地探究了盎格鲁-撒克逊王国的起源、社会效用和基督教对各种生物的收养,这些生物据说是祸害盎格鲁-撒克逊王国的土地,包括狼、龙、恶魔和类人生物。作者特别用心地证明了这些怪物和它们的家园如何仍然影响着我们对“他者”的误解,以及对荒野的持续厌倦。在一个非常简洁的介绍之后,其中包括对盎格鲁-撒克逊历史的相关历史评论,Flight的第一章,“怪物地图”,通过希腊罗马和古英语的文本参考,特别是从东方的奇迹,亚历山大给亚里士多德的信件,和《怪物文集》中,提供了一个关于怪物位置和居住地的概述,从而在地理上定位了接下来的章节。正是在这一节中,作者证明了在影响盎格鲁-撒克逊人的文化中存在着文明和不文明世界之间的明确划分,并且他们欣然接受了这种划分。正如他们自己的著作所证明的那样,怪物和其他自然奇观一样,是盎格鲁-撒克逊人风景的一部分,“怪物[构成]世界边缘未开化地区自然动物群的一部分”(61)。在第二章“狼与人”和第三章“Hic Sunt Dracones”中,Flight考虑了盎格鲁-撒克逊世界中最顽固的两种怪物:狼和龙。关于狼,作者证明了它对盎格鲁-撒克逊农民的牲畜的捕食明显令人讨厌,加上它的攻击的恶毒,产生了对这种动物的超自然恐惧。尽管狼的行为符合自己的本性,但这种动物不仅被认为是自然意义上的怪物,而且被认为是与神圣对立的怪物,Flight说,正因为如此,“狼既是怪物又是恶魔”(73),它敢于挑战上帝最无辜的创造物的神圣性。虽然没有证据表明龙曾经存在过,但Flight在下一章中表明,在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界,龙是一种非常真实的恐惧,并在许多古英语文本中被引用。作者提出,龙的困惑使其成为一种他者性的工具,鼓励文明和不文明土地之间的持续分裂,他说“龙能够履行它的象征性角色,因为它是异教荒野的怪物”(102)。在龙的神话中根深蒂固的是它的贪婪,许多故事都评论了它在隐藏的地下巢穴中获得和保存黄金的欲望;Flight认为基督教在这些故事中的应用是阻止贪婪和欲望之罪的一种手段,龙的危险威胁是一种威慑警告,龙作为“贪婪的可怕象征,警告人们犯罪的后果”(110)。当盎格鲁-撒克逊人在第一个千年的后半叶迅速皈依基督教时,另一个怪物进入那个时期的心灵也就不足为奇了:恶魔。在第四章“圣徒和撒旦”中,Flight深入研究了恶魔作为怪物如何进一步证明文明和不文明世界的分裂,以及荒野的危险如何被解释为恶魔力量对圣人困境的恶意反对。作者引用了两个著名的盎格鲁-撒克逊圣人的例子,他们飞到野外寻找沉思和祈祷,但却遇到了恶魔;克兰的古斯拉克和林迪斯法恩的卡斯伯特。古斯拉克在森林沼泽的沼泽中选择了一个家,在野外被恶魔搭讪;正面不是身体上的,但是……
{"title":"Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight (review)","authors":"Scott Royle","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight Scott Royle Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World (London: Reaktion, 2021), 262 pp., 20 ills. The first book by author Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World, is a look into the various diabolic creatures that shared the land with the Anglo-Saxon peoples of medieval Britain. Flight presents a clear investigation of the origins, social utility, and Christian adoption of the various creatures that were said to plague the lands of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, including wolves, dragons, demons, and humanoids. The author takes special care to evidence how these monsters, and their homes, still influence our misunderstandings of the “other” and an ongoing weariness of the wild. After a very concise introduction, which includes pertinent historical remarks on Anglo-Saxon history, Flight’s first chapter, “The Map of Monsters,” geographically situates the coming chapters by providing an overview of the locations and habitations of monsters through both Graeco-Roman and Old English textual references, notably from The Wonders of the East, The Letters of Alexander to Aristotle, and the Liber monstrorum. It is in this section that the author demonstrates that a clear division between a civilized and uncivilized world existed in the cultures that influenced the Anglo-Saxons and that they readily adopted this division. As evidenced in their own writings, monsters were as much a part of the scenery for the Anglo-Saxons as any other natural wonder with “monsters [forming] part of the natural fauna of uncivilized places at the edge of the world” (61). In chapter 2, “Of Wolf and Man,” and chapter 3, “Hic Sunt Dracones,” Flight considers two of the most persistent monsters in the Anglo-Saxon world: the wolf and the dragon. Of the wolf, the author attests that the obvious nuisance of its preying upon the livestock of Anglo-Saxon farmers, combined with the viciousness of its attack, produced a supernatural fear of the animal. Despite the wolf’s acting within its own nature, the specimen was not only deemed a monster in the natural sense but one in opposition to that which is holy, with Flight saying that for this reason, “the wolf is both a monster and a diabolic creature” (73), one that dares defy the sanctity of God’s most innocent creations. While there is no evidence that dragons ever existed, Flight demonstrates in the next chapter that in the Anglo-Saxon world they were a very real fear and cited in numerous Old English texts. The author proposes that the perplexity of the dragon lends to its use as a device of otherness that encouraged a continued division between civilized and uncivilized lands, saying that “the dragon is able to fulfil [its] symbolic role because it is a monster of the pagan wilderness” (102). Ingrained into the mythology of the dragon is its greed, with many stories commenting on its lust for attainin","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith (review) 文艺复兴后期的艺术和珍品柜:对朱利叶斯·冯·施洛瑟的收藏史的贡献,以及杰弗里·奇普斯·史密斯的《艺术:神圣罗马帝国的早期现代艺术和珍品柜》(评论)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912704
Rachel Daphne Weiss
Reviewed by: Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith Rachel Daphne Weiss Julius von Schlosser, Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting, trans. Jonathan Blower, ed. Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann (Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2021), xi + 231 pp., 98 ills. Jeffrey Chipps Smith, Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire (London: Reaktion, 2022), 317 pp., 189 ills. Efforts to understand the macrocosm through the conceit of the microcosm may well be transhistorical, but their modern Euro-American origins can be alluringly traced to the Kunstkammer. Emerging mainly within dominions of the Holy Roman Empire during the early modern period, Kunstkammern (pl., art and curiosity cabinets) describe both physical sites of collection display and a particular orientation to the practice of collecting shared among princely patrons. Kunstkammern were fundamentally eclectic, juxtaposing works of art, natural objects, natural objects reimagined as works of art, tools, instruments, antiquities, and other miscellanea in service of complex ambitions. Such collections had microcosmic pretensions; they functioned as representations of their owner’s wealth, power, and aesthetic judgment; they triggered scientific inquiry through their wondrous and challenging materializations; and they helped to fathom and to impose order onto a cosmos destabilized by religious strife and encounters with peoples and geographies previously unknown to Europeans. Research on Kunstkammern has proliferated since the 1970s and 80s, but Julius von Schlosser’s Die Kunst- und Wunderkammern der Spätrenaissance planted the seeds of this avid interest upon its publication in 1908. Due to its hitherto untranslated state, Schlosser’s groundbreaking contribution has languished in the footnotes of Anglophone scholarship, rarely piercing the veil to become a subject of study in its own right. It is a boon, therefore, that this landmark was targeted for the Getty Research Institute’s (GRI) Texts and Documents series, appearing in translation by Jonathan Blower as Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting with a substantial introductory essay by Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann. That this publication was closely followed by Jeffrey Chipps Smith’s Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire gives further cause for excitement, as Smith’s study grounds what had through a multitude of perspectives become a dauntingly expansive field of study. The GRI publication’s success lies, in part, in its treatment of Schlosser’s text as a historical document. While Kaufmann analyzes the text’s ideas about and interpretations of Kunstkammern, much of the introduction
由:文艺复兴晚期的艺术和珍品柜:对收藏史的贡献由朱利叶斯·冯·施洛瑟,和:Kunstkammer:早期现代艺术和珍品柜在神圣罗马帝国由杰弗里·奇普斯·史密斯雷切尔·达芙妮·韦斯朱利叶斯·冯·施洛瑟,文艺复兴晚期的艺术和珍品柜:对收藏史的贡献,翻译。乔纳森·布洛尔主编,托马斯·达科斯塔·考夫曼(洛杉矶:盖蒂研究所,2021年),xi + 231页,98页。杰弗里·奇普斯·史密斯,《艺术:神圣罗马帝国的早期现代艺术和珍奇柜》(伦敦:Reaktion, 2022), 317页,189页。通过微观世界的自负来理解宏观世界的努力可能是超越历史的,但它们的现代欧美起源可以诱人地追溯到艺术。Kunstkammern主要出现在近代早期神圣罗马帝国的领土内,它既描述了收藏展示的物理场所,也描述了王子赞助人之间共享的收藏实践的特定方向。Kunstkammern基本上是折衷的,并置艺术作品,自然物体,自然物体重新想象为艺术作品,工具,仪器,古董和其他杂项服务于复杂的野心。这样的收藏有微观上的自命不凡;它们代表着主人的财富、权力和审美;他们通过他们奇妙和具有挑战性的物化引发了科学探究;他们帮助理解并将秩序强加给一个因宗教冲突和遭遇欧洲人以前不知道的民族和地理而不稳定的宇宙。自20世纪70年代和80年代以来,对艺术艺术的研究激增,但朱利叶斯·冯·施洛瑟(Julius von Schlosser)在1908年出版的《艺术与艺术艺术》(Die Kunst- und Wunderkammern der Spätrenaissance)播下了这种狂热兴趣的种子。由于其迄今未被翻译,施洛瑟的开创性贡献在英语学术的脚注中受到冷落,很少突破面纱,成为自己研究的主题。因此,这一地标成为盖蒂研究所(GRI)文本和文献系列的目标,这是一个福音,由乔纳森·布洛尔(Jonathan Blower)翻译为文艺复兴晚期的艺术和好奇柜:对收藏史的贡献,并附有托马斯·达科斯塔·考夫曼(Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann)的大量介绍文章。紧随其后的是杰弗里·奇普斯·史密斯(Jeffrey Chipps Smith)的《艺术:神圣罗马帝国的早期现代艺术和珍奇柜》(Kunstkammer),这进一步引起了人们的兴奋,因为史密斯的研究表明,通过多种视角,它已经成为一个令人生畏的广阔研究领域。GRI出版物的成功部分在于它将Schlosser的文本作为历史文献来处理。虽然考夫曼分析了文本对艺术的看法和解释,但大部分引言都是对施洛瑟本人的分析。考夫曼努力纠正Schlosser作为维也纳学派边缘人物的普遍看法,通过他在维也纳艺术博物馆的长期任期和作为Universität维也纳教授的方式证明了他的重要性,在那里他监督了一些二十世纪艺术史上的显要人物(恩斯特·贡布里希,弗里茨·萨克斯,查尔斯·德·托尔内等)。考夫曼将Schlosser对宫廷艺术概念的理论依赖与他在维也纳机构的就业条件联系在一起,这在功能上和象征意义上将他与哈布斯堡遗产联系在一起。最后,考夫曼与施洛瑟戴着纳粹党别针的照片的诅咒含义进行了斗争,但是,除了与那个时期令人憎恶但更普遍的以欧洲为中心的优越感相一致的偶然偏见评论之外,考夫曼在施洛瑟的作品中没有发现纳粹意识形态的明显表现。如果一个人仍然倾向于继续阅读施洛瑟的文本,那么他将获得回报。他的博学对当代读者来说是引人注目的,它产生了认识论的痕迹,就像在艺术作品中所表达的那样独特。贯穿全书各个章节的主题是Schlosser对艺术定义方式的探索,这是艺术界在多媒体和跨学科混乱中产生的一种渴望。最终,而且相当有先见之明的是,他将艺术定义为其形式高于一切的价值,并将收藏行为定义为艺术的组成部分。虽然我们可以从中获益良多……
{"title":"Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith (review)","authors":"Rachel Daphne Weiss","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912704","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith Rachel Daphne Weiss Julius von Schlosser, Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting, trans. Jonathan Blower, ed. Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann (Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2021), xi + 231 pp., 98 ills. Jeffrey Chipps Smith, Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire (London: Reaktion, 2022), 317 pp., 189 ills. Efforts to understand the macrocosm through the conceit of the microcosm may well be transhistorical, but their modern Euro-American origins can be alluringly traced to the Kunstkammer. Emerging mainly within dominions of the Holy Roman Empire during the early modern period, Kunstkammern (pl., art and curiosity cabinets) describe both physical sites of collection display and a particular orientation to the practice of collecting shared among princely patrons. Kunstkammern were fundamentally eclectic, juxtaposing works of art, natural objects, natural objects reimagined as works of art, tools, instruments, antiquities, and other miscellanea in service of complex ambitions. Such collections had microcosmic pretensions; they functioned as representations of their owner’s wealth, power, and aesthetic judgment; they triggered scientific inquiry through their wondrous and challenging materializations; and they helped to fathom and to impose order onto a cosmos destabilized by religious strife and encounters with peoples and geographies previously unknown to Europeans. Research on Kunstkammern has proliferated since the 1970s and 80s, but Julius von Schlosser’s Die Kunst- und Wunderkammern der Spätrenaissance planted the seeds of this avid interest upon its publication in 1908. Due to its hitherto untranslated state, Schlosser’s groundbreaking contribution has languished in the footnotes of Anglophone scholarship, rarely piercing the veil to become a subject of study in its own right. It is a boon, therefore, that this landmark was targeted for the Getty Research Institute’s (GRI) Texts and Documents series, appearing in translation by Jonathan Blower as Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting with a substantial introductory essay by Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann. That this publication was closely followed by Jeffrey Chipps Smith’s Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire gives further cause for excitement, as Smith’s study grounds what had through a multitude of perspectives become a dauntingly expansive field of study. The GRI publication’s success lies, in part, in its treatment of Schlosser’s text as a historical document. While Kaufmann analyzes the text’s ideas about and interpretations of Kunstkammern, much of the introduction","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135710994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England by Jordan Kirk (review) 《中世纪的废话:14世纪英格兰的无意义》,作者:乔丹·柯克(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912696
Kashaf Qureshi
Reviewed by: Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England by Jordan Kirk Kashaf Qureshi Jordan Kirk, Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England (New York: Fordham University Press, 2021), 187 pp. While the term “signification” lends itself to oversaturation in literary studies, it poses a unique problematic in the study of medieval literature, where critics too often treat texts as puzzles meant to be secured into predetermined, discernable fixtures. Jordan Kirk reminds us to remain open to the idea that the interpretive purchase of medieval texts is, in fact, their inchoateness, engaged in the play of not making meaning, or nonsense. Bringing together the grammatical arts of the Middle Ages, the discipline of medieval logic, and fourteenth-century contemplative literature, Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England reorients us toward the ubiquity of nonsignification in medieval thought. Through the book’s structural organization, Kirk draws the mind’s ear into the world of nonsignification, each chapter divided by short subtitles such as “Bu, Ba, Buf,” emblematizing a verbal crux at the heart of each section. Kirk’s designs are intentional, and he describes the four main chapters of the book as a sequence of commentaries operating as “a set of mind engines” that “allow for awareness to encounter itself in the mirror of the past” (21). Because of this methodological commitment, some of the book’s innovations are understated. For instance, Kirk’s archive may seem odd at first—the first two chapters are an exhaustive linguistic history whereas the second two chapters each analyze a single work of experimental literature, respectively The Cloud of Unknowing and St. Erkenwald. However, these archival choices produce a cogent literary history that encompassed what I considered to be one of Kirk’s most compelling and salient [End Page 245] contributions: a call for the renovation of the category of the literary itself. For Kirk, the literary is a hermeneutic mode rooted in the emptiness of words, a topic most explicitly explored in the book’s introductory prolegomena. In the prolegomena, Kirk asks readers to think of Medieval Nonsense as an “archeology of the literary” (24), where literature encompasses any text that is “engineered in such a manner as to arrest the faculty of interpretation and force it to focus on the nonsignificative event of language itself” (25). In the treasury of these first twenty-six pages, where Kirk constellates nonsignification in Chaucer’s House of Fame, modernist literature and theory, and Anslem of Canterbury’s ontological proof of God, readers will discover what might be shared between medieval texts and avant-garde poetics, opening an exciting avenue for transhistorical literary theorization. This book will largely appeal to medievalists working in the fields of linguistics, philosophy, religion, and literary studies; but its introduction should b
书评:《中世纪的废话:在14世纪的英格兰毫无意义》,作者:Jordan Kirk,《中世纪的废话:在14世纪的英格兰毫无意义》,纽约:福特汉姆大学出版社,2021),187页。虽然“意义”一词在文学研究中过于饱和,但它在中世纪文学研究中提出了一个独特的问题,批评家们经常把文本当作谜题,意味着要固定在预定的、可识别的固定装置中。乔丹·柯克提醒我们要保持开放的心态,对中世纪文本的解释性购买,实际上是它们的不成熟,参与了没有意义或胡说八道的游戏。汇集了中世纪的语法艺术、中世纪的逻辑学科和14世纪的沉思文学,《中世纪的废话:14世纪英格兰的无意义》将我们重新导向中世纪思想中无处不在的无意义。通过这本书的结构组织,柯克把读者的耳朵拉进了一个毫无意义的世界,每一章都有简短的字幕,比如“不,不,但是”,象征着每一节核心的语言问题。柯克的设计是有意为之,他将书中的四个主要章节描述为一系列的评论,就像“一套思维引擎”,“允许意识在过去的镜子中遇到自己”(21)。由于这种方法论上的承诺,本书的一些创新被低估了。例如,柯克的档案乍一看可能很奇怪——前两章是详尽的语言学史,而后两章分别分析了一部实验文学作品,分别是《未知之云》和《圣埃尔肯瓦尔德》。然而,这些档案选择产生了令人信服的文学史,其中包含了我认为柯克最引人注目和最突出的贡献之一:呼吁对文学本身的分类进行革新。对柯克来说,文学是一种根植于文字空虚的解释学模式,这一主题在本书的引言部分得到了最明确的探讨。在《绪论》中,柯克要求读者把中世纪的胡言乱语想象成“文学的考古学”(24),在这里,文学包含了任何“以这种方式设计的文本,以阻止解释的能力,迫使它专注于语言本身的无意义事件”(25)。在前二十六页的宝库中,柯克列举了乔叟的《名人堂》中的无意义,现代主义文学和理论,以及坎特伯雷的安斯勒姆的上帝本体论证明,读者将发现中世纪文本和前卫诗学之间可能有什么共同之处,为超历史文学理论化开辟了一条令人兴奋的道路。这本书将在很大程度上吸引在语言学、哲学、宗教和文学研究领域工作的中世纪学者;但它的介绍应该是发人深省的学者感兴趣的长期研究符号学和文学理论。柯克的读者会发现,他的作品反映了他的研究对象的富有成效的优柔寡断的形式:当你到达一个理解点时,作者的下一步是解构那个到达点,揭示这些意义制造的理论是如何包含他们自己的反理论的火种的。柯克在前两章的任务是向读者介绍语法和逻辑学科之间对vox的不同处理:中世纪的语法学家经常使用无意义的词,而逻辑学家通常在他们的项目中拒绝无意义,这是否意味着他们的工作不受无意义研究的影响,或者完全拆除无意义语言的可能性。从古代权威开始,第一章是通过哲学和语言艺术教科书的旅程,这些将被传播到中世纪后期的教室。柯克分析了普里西安的《语法制度》,波伊提乌对亚里士多德的《解释》的开创性评论,以及奥古斯丁的符号学,证明了无意义是声音不可分割的属性和可能性这一观点的斗争。尽管普里西安和波伊提乌允许对声音进行分类,其中某些话语,如音节,可能没有任何意义,但奥古斯丁将所有声音,单词和事物纳入一个符号系统,其中它们总是有意义的。这样的辩论构成了……
{"title":"Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England by Jordan Kirk (review)","authors":"Kashaf Qureshi","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912696","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England by Jordan Kirk Kashaf Qureshi Jordan Kirk, Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England (New York: Fordham University Press, 2021), 187 pp. While the term “signification” lends itself to oversaturation in literary studies, it poses a unique problematic in the study of medieval literature, where critics too often treat texts as puzzles meant to be secured into predetermined, discernable fixtures. Jordan Kirk reminds us to remain open to the idea that the interpretive purchase of medieval texts is, in fact, their inchoateness, engaged in the play of not making meaning, or nonsense. Bringing together the grammatical arts of the Middle Ages, the discipline of medieval logic, and fourteenth-century contemplative literature, Medieval Nonsense: Signifying Nothing in Fourteenth-Century England reorients us toward the ubiquity of nonsignification in medieval thought. Through the book’s structural organization, Kirk draws the mind’s ear into the world of nonsignification, each chapter divided by short subtitles such as “Bu, Ba, Buf,” emblematizing a verbal crux at the heart of each section. Kirk’s designs are intentional, and he describes the four main chapters of the book as a sequence of commentaries operating as “a set of mind engines” that “allow for awareness to encounter itself in the mirror of the past” (21). Because of this methodological commitment, some of the book’s innovations are understated. For instance, Kirk’s archive may seem odd at first—the first two chapters are an exhaustive linguistic history whereas the second two chapters each analyze a single work of experimental literature, respectively The Cloud of Unknowing and St. Erkenwald. However, these archival choices produce a cogent literary history that encompassed what I considered to be one of Kirk’s most compelling and salient [End Page 245] contributions: a call for the renovation of the category of the literary itself. For Kirk, the literary is a hermeneutic mode rooted in the emptiness of words, a topic most explicitly explored in the book’s introductory prolegomena. In the prolegomena, Kirk asks readers to think of Medieval Nonsense as an “archeology of the literary” (24), where literature encompasses any text that is “engineered in such a manner as to arrest the faculty of interpretation and force it to focus on the nonsignificative event of language itself” (25). In the treasury of these first twenty-six pages, where Kirk constellates nonsignification in Chaucer’s House of Fame, modernist literature and theory, and Anslem of Canterbury’s ontological proof of God, readers will discover what might be shared between medieval texts and avant-garde poetics, opening an exciting avenue for transhistorical literary theorization. This book will largely appeal to medievalists working in the fields of linguistics, philosophy, religion, and literary studies; but its introduction should b","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135711236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Lost Kingdom of St. Vladimir: Crusading Mentality, Medieval Memory, and the Russia-Ukraine War 失落的圣弗拉基米尔王国:十字军精神、中世纪记忆和俄乌战争
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912676
Hilary Rhodes
Abstract: Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine has reawakened interest in the long-running historical, political, and cultural sources of the conflict, and produced a vast discourse from Russian, Ukrainian, Western, and other regional, national, and international actors. While such analyses often focus on Vladimir Putin’s perceived desire to rebuild the Soviet Union as it existed from 1922 to 1991, this article argues that his chief motivations, and the ultimate sources of his rhetoric, are drawn from much deeper medieval roots. It explores the premodern ancestries of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, Prince Vladimir the Great’s conversion to Orthodox Christianity in circa 988, and Russia’s deeply complicated relationship with the medieval crusades, especially in regard to the thirteenth-century Baltic expeditions and the heroic depiction of Prince Aleksandr Nevsky (1221–63) as a crusading defender against aggressive Western invaders. By demonstrating how the conflict between Russia and the West has long been perceived or cast in metaphors, rhetoric, and symbolism with explicit crusading origins, from the Baltic crusades to the Crimean War (1853–56) to the present-day struggle, the article offers a comparative perspective on medieval and modern historiography, illuminates the medieval origins of an ongoing modern global and geopolitical issue, and urges scholars to consider more complex frames of reference for both this war and the memory and usage of the crusades more generally.
摘要:俄罗斯2022年入侵乌克兰重新唤起了人们对这场冲突长期存在的历史、政治和文化根源的兴趣,并产生了来自俄罗斯、乌克兰、西方和其他地区、国家和国际行动者的广泛讨论。虽然这类分析通常关注弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)重建1922年至1991年存在的苏联的愿望,但本文认为,他的主要动机和他的言论的最终来源,都来自中世纪更深层次的根源。它探讨了俄罗斯、乌克兰和白俄罗斯的前现代祖先,弗拉基米尔大帝在大约988年皈依东正教,以及俄罗斯与中世纪十字军的复杂关系,特别是关于13世纪波罗的海远征和亚历山大·涅夫斯基王子(1221-63)作为抵抗西方侵略者的十字军捍卫者的英雄形象。从波罗的海十字军到克里米亚战争(1853-56),再到今天的斗争,俄罗斯与西方之间的冲突长期以来是如何被理解或以隐喻、修辞和象征主义的形式表达出来的,这篇文章提供了一个中世纪和现代史学的比较视角,阐明了一个正在进行的现代全球和地缘政治问题的中世纪起源。并敦促学者们考虑更复杂的参照系,无论是对这场战争,还是对十字军东征的记忆和使用。
{"title":"The Lost Kingdom of St. Vladimir: Crusading Mentality, Medieval Memory, and the Russia-Ukraine War","authors":"Hilary Rhodes","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912676","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine has reawakened interest in the long-running historical, political, and cultural sources of the conflict, and produced a vast discourse from Russian, Ukrainian, Western, and other regional, national, and international actors. While such analyses often focus on Vladimir Putin’s perceived desire to rebuild the Soviet Union as it existed from 1922 to 1991, this article argues that his chief motivations, and the ultimate sources of his rhetoric, are drawn from much deeper medieval roots. It explores the premodern ancestries of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, Prince Vladimir the Great’s conversion to Orthodox Christianity in circa 988, and Russia’s deeply complicated relationship with the medieval crusades, especially in regard to the thirteenth-century Baltic expeditions and the heroic depiction of Prince Aleksandr Nevsky (1221–63) as a crusading defender against aggressive Western invaders. By demonstrating how the conflict between Russia and the West has long been perceived or cast in metaphors, rhetoric, and symbolism with explicit crusading origins, from the Baltic crusades to the Crimean War (1853–56) to the present-day struggle, the article offers a comparative perspective on medieval and modern historiography, illuminates the medieval origins of an ongoing modern global and geopolitical issue, and urges scholars to consider more complex frames of reference for both this war and the memory and usage of the crusades more generally.","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Louise of Savoy’s Epistles of the Heroines as a Fashion Statement 路易丝·萨沃伊的《女英雄书信》作为时尚宣言
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912672
Juliet Huang
Abstract: This article examines issues that surround portraits of ancient heroines in a manuscript commissioned by the French noblewoman Louise of Savoy at the end of the fifteenth century. With a focus on the images of Phaedra and Laodamia, this article explores how clothes worn by the sitter amplify, confirm, and transform the subject’s identity in relation to the many roles women played at the French court, such as wives and regents, and through which they exercised their influence. Through meaningful representations of dress, the manuscript emerges as a subtle commentary on contemporary court politics in light of the ancient examples and moral principles they illustrate, and in particular as an implicit and subtle argument in support of the significant role and efficacy of women in politics. The multiplicity of identity that clothing constructs for the sitter ushers in new understandings of royal- and noblewomen’s political, social, and intellectual aspirations.
摘要:本文考察了15世纪末法国贵族女子路易丝(Louise of Savoy)委托创作的一份手稿中围绕古代女英雄肖像的问题。本文以费德拉和劳达米亚的形象为重点,探讨了模特所穿的衣服是如何放大、确认和改变主题的身份的,而这些身份与女性在法国宫廷中扮演的许多角色有关,比如妻子和摄政王,以及她们通过这些角色行使自己的影响力。通过对服装的有意义的表现,手稿作为对当代宫廷政治的微妙评论,根据古代的例子和道德原则,特别是作为一个隐含的和微妙的论点,支持妇女在政治中的重要作用和功效。服装为模特构建的多重身份带来了对王室和贵族女性政治、社会和智力抱负的新理解。
{"title":"Louise of Savoy’s Epistles of the Heroines as a Fashion Statement","authors":"Juliet Huang","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912672","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article examines issues that surround portraits of ancient heroines in a manuscript commissioned by the French noblewoman Louise of Savoy at the end of the fifteenth century. With a focus on the images of Phaedra and Laodamia, this article explores how clothes worn by the sitter amplify, confirm, and transform the subject’s identity in relation to the many roles women played at the French court, such as wives and regents, and through which they exercised their influence. Through meaningful representations of dress, the manuscript emerges as a subtle commentary on contemporary court politics in light of the ancient examples and moral principles they illustrate, and in particular as an implicit and subtle argument in support of the significant role and efficacy of women in politics. The multiplicity of identity that clothing constructs for the sitter ushers in new understandings of royal- and noblewomen’s political, social, and intellectual aspirations.","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict ed. by Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski (review) 《西方修道精神:卡西恩、阿尔勒的凯撒利乌斯和本笃》,罗杰·海特、阿尔弗雷德·帕奇三世和阿曼达·阿维拉·卡明斯基主编(书评)
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912690
Lucas P. Depierre
Reviewed by: Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict ed. by Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski Lucas P. Depierre Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski, eds., Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict (New York: Fordham University Press, 2022), 136 pp. In this accessible introduction to Western monastic spirituality, Roger Haight (Union Theological Seminary in New York), Alfred Pach III (Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine), and Amanda Avila Kaminski (Texas Lutheran University) offer primary texts from three classic figures: John Cassian (d. ca. 435), Caesarius of Arles (d. 542), and Benedict of Nursia (d. 547). These texts are accompanied by an introduction on the historical context, as well as a concluding essay that engages spirituality in the present day. These editors have published the volume within the series Past Light on Present Life: Theology, Ethics, and Spirituality, with a threefold aspiration (130–31): (1) providing historical context for the primary texts and their authors to introduce the central theme, in this volume “western monastic spirituality”; (2) offering primary texts that serve as testimony to the key insights of the classical figures under study; and (3) providing reflections on the enduring relevance of those teachings in our current life. In contrast with the promising title, this work falls short of engaging Western monasticism as a comprehensive phenomenon but succinctly presents the three figures mentioned in the subtitle. In general, the introduction of the historical context (part 1, pp. 1–20) is unsatisfactory if not misleading. For instance, it fails to notice that Cassian’s spiritual themes are primarily addressed to individual ascetic sages rather than regulated monasteries; in fact, what evidence is there that he ever found a community? Explaining that Caesarius simply “translates Cassian’s theory” (9) overlooks the crucial significance of contrasting paradigms (eremitical/communal) in the birth of monasticism—and even monasticisms. The introduction of the texts themselves disregards the complexity of late antique and early medieval sources that have intricately shaped Western monasticism and these specific texts. The assertion that Caesarius solely relies on [End Page 230] Augustine and Cassian (9) is dubious. For example, living in Arles, Caesarius probably knows De vita contemplativa of Julianus Pomerius who died in Arles around 499–505. The exhortations to virgins by Clement of Rome (d. ca. 99) or De laude heremi of Eucherius of Lyon (d. ca. 449) addressed to Hilary of Arles (d. ca. 428) may have also influenced him. Furthermore, in contrast to an idealist picture, the Eastern inspiration of monastic spirituality was not only conveyed in the south of France through the mediation of Cassian as the reader may believe reading this volume. Notably, Rufinus of Alquileia (d. ca. 411) had translated the In
评论:西方修道院灵性:卡西恩,阿尔勒的凯撒利乌斯和本笃,罗杰·海特,阿尔弗雷德·帕奇三世和阿曼达·阿维拉·卡明斯基编,卢卡斯·p·德皮埃尔,罗杰·海特,阿尔弗雷德·帕奇三世和阿曼达·阿维拉·卡明斯基编。,西方修道院精神:卡西安,阿尔勒的凯撒留斯和本尼迪克特(纽约:福特汉姆大学出版社,2022),136页。在这个容易理解的西方修道院精神介绍中,罗杰·海特(纽约联合神学院),阿尔弗雷德·帕奇三世(哈肯萨克子路医学院)和阿曼达·阿维拉·卡明斯基(德克萨斯路德大学)提供了三个经典人物的主要文本:约翰·卡西安(约435年),阿尔勒的凯撒留斯(约542年)和努尔西亚的本尼迪克(约547年)。这些文本伴随着对历史背景的介绍,以及一篇结束语,在当今从事灵性。这些编辑已经出版了该卷在系列过去的光对现在的生活:神学,伦理,和灵性,有三个愿望(130-31):(1)提供历史背景的主要文本和他们的作者介绍中心主题,在这一卷“西方修道院灵性”;(2)提供作为所研究的古典人物的关键见解的证据的原始文本;(3)反思这些教义在我们当前生活中的持久相关性。与充满希望的标题相反,这部作品没有将西方修道主义作为一个全面的现象来描述,但却简洁地呈现了副标题中提到的三个人物。总的来说,对历史背景的介绍(第1部分,第1 - 20页)如果没有误导的话,是不令人满意的。例如,它没有注意到凯思安的精神主题主要是针对个人的苦行圣人,而不是规范的修道院;事实上,有什么证据表明他曾经找到过一个社区?解释凯撒留斯只是简单地“翻译了卡西安的理论”(9)忽略了在修道——甚至修道主义的诞生中,对比范式(敬拜的/社群的)的关键意义。文本的介绍本身忽视了古代晚期和中世纪早期来源的复杂性,这些来源错综复杂地塑造了西方修道主义和这些特定的文本。凯撒留斯完全依赖奥古斯丁和卡西安(9)的断言是可疑的。例如,凯撒留斯住在阿尔勒,他可能知道约499-505年死于阿尔勒的朱利亚努斯·波梅里乌斯的《沉思的生活》。罗马的克莱门特(公元99年)或里昂的Eucherius的De laude heremi(公元449年)对阿尔勒的希拉里(公元428年)的处女的劝告可能也影响了他。此外,与理想主义的画面相反,东方修道院灵性的灵感不仅仅是在法国南部通过卡西安的调解传达的,正如读者在阅读本卷时可能相信的那样。值得注意的是,Alquileia的Rufinus(约411年)在397年之前翻译了凯撒利亚Basil of Caesarea的Instituta monachorum(约397年),Jerome大约在404年翻译了《Pachomius Rule》。大约在公元500年,如果不是更早的话,后来启发了圣本笃教规的《裁判条例》(Regula magistri)很可能是由更早的材料组合而成的。此外,这本书的开头部分并没有说明编辑们选择排除对西方修道精神的出现做出重大贡献的其他文本:其中包括奥古斯丁规则,这是西方最古老的修道规则,如在第211封书信或第355篇和第356篇布道中所揭露的,上面提到的一些拉丁文本,甚至是严格的布拉加的frutuosus规则(约665年)。编辑的第二个目标,其目的是提供直接的第一手资料,相对较好地实现了,尽管该卷不应被视为一个关键版本。卡西安的会议1是根据欧文·查德威克1958年的严肃译本出版的,没有任何修改。《凯撒留斯修女的规则》是1960年玛丽亚·明爱斯·麦卡锡的博士论文提供的,这是当时第一个可用的英文译本。同样,原始文本和注释没有改变,包括麦卡锡的非上下文化的哲学评论,以及一些没有访问原始文本就无法追踪的“同引文”参考。这篇主要文章的选择突出表明,即使不是用自己的声音说话,女性……
{"title":"Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict ed. by Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski (review)","authors":"Lucas P. Depierre","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912690","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict ed. by Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski Lucas P. Depierre Roger Haight, Alfred Pach III, and Amanda Avila Kaminski, eds., Western Monastic Spirituality: Cassian, Caesarius of Arles, and Benedict (New York: Fordham University Press, 2022), 136 pp. In this accessible introduction to Western monastic spirituality, Roger Haight (Union Theological Seminary in New York), Alfred Pach III (Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine), and Amanda Avila Kaminski (Texas Lutheran University) offer primary texts from three classic figures: John Cassian (d. ca. 435), Caesarius of Arles (d. 542), and Benedict of Nursia (d. 547). These texts are accompanied by an introduction on the historical context, as well as a concluding essay that engages spirituality in the present day. These editors have published the volume within the series Past Light on Present Life: Theology, Ethics, and Spirituality, with a threefold aspiration (130–31): (1) providing historical context for the primary texts and their authors to introduce the central theme, in this volume “western monastic spirituality”; (2) offering primary texts that serve as testimony to the key insights of the classical figures under study; and (3) providing reflections on the enduring relevance of those teachings in our current life. In contrast with the promising title, this work falls short of engaging Western monasticism as a comprehensive phenomenon but succinctly presents the three figures mentioned in the subtitle. In general, the introduction of the historical context (part 1, pp. 1–20) is unsatisfactory if not misleading. For instance, it fails to notice that Cassian’s spiritual themes are primarily addressed to individual ascetic sages rather than regulated monasteries; in fact, what evidence is there that he ever found a community? Explaining that Caesarius simply “translates Cassian’s theory” (9) overlooks the crucial significance of contrasting paradigms (eremitical/communal) in the birth of monasticism—and even monasticisms. The introduction of the texts themselves disregards the complexity of late antique and early medieval sources that have intricately shaped Western monasticism and these specific texts. The assertion that Caesarius solely relies on [End Page 230] Augustine and Cassian (9) is dubious. For example, living in Arles, Caesarius probably knows De vita contemplativa of Julianus Pomerius who died in Arles around 499–505. The exhortations to virgins by Clement of Rome (d. ca. 99) or De laude heremi of Eucherius of Lyon (d. ca. 449) addressed to Hilary of Arles (d. ca. 428) may have also influenced him. Furthermore, in contrast to an idealist picture, the Eastern inspiration of monastic spirituality was not only conveyed in the south of France through the mediation of Cassian as the reader may believe reading this volume. Notably, Rufinus of Alquileia (d. ca. 411) had translated the In","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards (review) 《近代早期创伤:欧洲与大西洋世界》,艾琳·彼得斯、辛西娅·理查兹主编
3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700
Justine Semmens
Reviewed by: Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards Justine Semmens Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, eds., Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021), xii + 397 pp., 7 ills. Melinda Rabb opens the afterword to Early Modern Trauma with a rich and satisfying salvo that more than justifies the need for more research into the role and impact that trauma played in shaping early modern texts: “Seen through the complex lens of contemporary trauma theories, the early modern world discloses its vulnerabilities, its catastrophes, and its strategies for representing experiences that defy representation” (361). First developed as a field of Freudian psychoanalytical theory in the 1990s, trauma studies originally posited that extreme experiences of physical, psychological, and emotional suffering can cause severe disruptions in memory, the integrity of identity and the psyche, and an epistemological rupture between the experience of this suffering and the inadequacy of language to describe or comprehend it. Although trauma was initially pathologized as a diagnostic function for clinical settings, by the early aughts deploying trauma as a category of analysis was beginning to enter the margins of the lexical toolbox of literary criticism, cultural studies, and historical analysis. Much of this scholarship has concentrated on examinations of trauma in modern or, even more precisely, the late modern contexts and social rupture of industrialized war, genocide, and mass economic migration that has isolated the interrogation of trauma from the more distant past. The first aim of Early Modern Trauma, a collection of essays edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, is to urge scholars of premodern art, literature, and society to take more seriously the opportunity to examine the early modern past through the lens of trauma studies—a lacuna they argue that is all the more vexing because the early modern world was shaped by the sort of rupture and violence that trauma studies is devoted to understanding. Peters and Richards point out that scholars of the early modern world have exhibited a certain amount of reticence about configuring trauma studies into their analyses on the basis that it introduces anachronistic models of identity, individuality, and social belonging that cannot be accurately or reliably transported to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The second aim of this collection of essays is to demonstrate that trauma theories can be applied fruitfully “beyond and before” contemporary experience that “transcends time” (4). In other words, while what constitutes a traumatic event is specific to cultural, historical, and social contexts, violent and unspeakable rupture remains germane to the human experience of trauma. The ways that various texts and the authors that produce them ultimately derive meaning from trauma by synthesizing it into their s
书评:早期现代创伤:欧洲和大西洋世界由艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹贾斯汀·塞门斯艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹编辑。,早期现代创伤:欧洲和大西洋世界(林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2021年),12 + 397页,7病。梅琳达·拉布(Melinda Rabb)在《早期现代创伤》(Early Modern Trauma)一书的后篇中,以丰富而令人满意的论述开篇,不仅证明了对创伤在塑造早期现代文本中的作用和影响进行更多研究的必要性:“通过当代创伤理论的复杂镜头,早期现代世界揭示了它的脆弱性、灾难,以及它对不被表现的经历的表现策略”(361)。创伤研究最初是在20世纪90年代作为弗洛伊德精神分析理论的一个领域发展起来的,它最初假设身体、心理和情感痛苦的极端经历会导致记忆、身份和精神的完整性严重中断,并且在这种痛苦的经历和语言不足以描述或理解它之间产生认识论上的断裂。尽管创伤最初是作为一种临床诊断功能被病理化的,但在早期,将创伤作为一种分析范畴的部署开始进入文学批评、文化研究和历史分析的词汇工具箱的边缘。这些学术研究大多集中在对现代创伤的研究上,或者更准确地说,集中在对现代晚期的创伤的研究上,以及工业化战争、种族灭绝和大规模经济移民造成的社会破裂上,这些都把对创伤的研究与更遥远的过去隔离开来。《早期现代创伤》是一本由艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹编辑的文集,其第一个目的是敦促研究前现代艺术、文学和社会的学者们更认真地利用这个机会,通过创伤研究的视角来审视早期现代的过去。他们认为,这是一个更令人烦恼的空白,因为早期现代世界是由创伤研究致力于理解的那种破裂和暴力塑造的。彼得斯和理查兹指出,早期现代世界的学者在将创伤研究纳入他们的分析时表现出一定程度的沉默,因为它引入了身份、个性和社会归属的时代错误模型,这些模型无法准确或可靠地追溯到16世纪和17世纪。这本文集的第二个目的是证明创伤理论可以有效地应用于“超越时间”的当代经验(4)。换句话说,虽然构成创伤事件的因素是特定于文化、历史和社会背景的,但暴力和无法形容的破裂仍然与人类的创伤经验密切相关。各种文本及其作者最终从创伤中获得意义的方式,通过将其综合到他们特定的语境、世界观、文化和社会词汇中,为理解过去提供了重要的机会。这本书分为两部分,带有一些现世主义的意图,即探索“早期现代文本可以教给我们关于早期现代创伤概念的东西,以及现代创伤概念可以教给我们关于早期现代文本的东西”(15)。第一部分“重构现代创伤”中的文章发现了将现代创伤理论应用于对过去文本的历史解释的效用和局限性。这一部分以苏珊·布鲁姆霍尔的一篇引人入胜的文章开篇,这篇文章探讨了法国文艺复兴时期宫廷诗歌中自然灾害造成的集体苦难和环境破坏在精神、神学和哲学上的反应。Zachariah Long通过综合20世纪早期弗洛伊德分析学家Sándor Ferenczi提出的关于创伤后应激生存的“与侵略者的认同”理论和爱德华·雷诺在《人类灵魂的激情和能力》(约1640年)中阐述的关于概念认同的体液理论,研究了莎士比亚的《卢克蕾丝的强奸》(1594年)中对强奸创伤的解释。阿米莉亚·泽尔彻以创伤叙事的方式探索了英国不墨于国教的汉娜·艾伦的精神传记《上帝与选择基督徒仁慈相处的叙述》(1683)中描述的不可解释的皈依、身份形成、破裂和改革经历。远离环境、个人和精神启示的主题,凯瑟琳·埃里森审视了诗歌……
{"title":"Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards (review)","authors":"Justine Semmens","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards Justine Semmens Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, eds., Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021), xii + 397 pp., 7 ills. Melinda Rabb opens the afterword to Early Modern Trauma with a rich and satisfying salvo that more than justifies the need for more research into the role and impact that trauma played in shaping early modern texts: “Seen through the complex lens of contemporary trauma theories, the early modern world discloses its vulnerabilities, its catastrophes, and its strategies for representing experiences that defy representation” (361). First developed as a field of Freudian psychoanalytical theory in the 1990s, trauma studies originally posited that extreme experiences of physical, psychological, and emotional suffering can cause severe disruptions in memory, the integrity of identity and the psyche, and an epistemological rupture between the experience of this suffering and the inadequacy of language to describe or comprehend it. Although trauma was initially pathologized as a diagnostic function for clinical settings, by the early aughts deploying trauma as a category of analysis was beginning to enter the margins of the lexical toolbox of literary criticism, cultural studies, and historical analysis. Much of this scholarship has concentrated on examinations of trauma in modern or, even more precisely, the late modern contexts and social rupture of industrialized war, genocide, and mass economic migration that has isolated the interrogation of trauma from the more distant past. The first aim of Early Modern Trauma, a collection of essays edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, is to urge scholars of premodern art, literature, and society to take more seriously the opportunity to examine the early modern past through the lens of trauma studies—a lacuna they argue that is all the more vexing because the early modern world was shaped by the sort of rupture and violence that trauma studies is devoted to understanding. Peters and Richards point out that scholars of the early modern world have exhibited a certain amount of reticence about configuring trauma studies into their analyses on the basis that it introduces anachronistic models of identity, individuality, and social belonging that cannot be accurately or reliably transported to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The second aim of this collection of essays is to demonstrate that trauma theories can be applied fruitfully “beyond and before” contemporary experience that “transcends time” (4). In other words, while what constitutes a traumatic event is specific to cultural, historical, and social contexts, violent and unspeakable rupture remains germane to the human experience of trauma. The ways that various texts and the authors that produce them ultimately derive meaning from trauma by synthesizing it into their s","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135712289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Warning for Fair Women: Adultery and Murder in Shakespeare's Theater ed. by Ann C. Christensen (review) 《对美丽女性的警告:莎士比亚戏剧中的通奸与谋杀》,作者:安·c·克里斯滕森
IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2022.0011
Francesca Bua
{"title":"A Warning for Fair Women: Adultery and Murder in Shakespeare's Theater ed. by Ann C. Christensen (review)","authors":"Francesca Bua","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2022.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2022.0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45447163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Melancholy Void: Lyric and Masculinity in the Age of Góngora by Felipe Valencia (review) 忧郁的空虚:Góngora时代的抒情与男子气概,Felipe Valencia著(评论)
IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI: 10.1353/cjm.2022.0030
Andrés Orejuela
{"title":"The Melancholy Void: Lyric and Masculinity in the Age of Góngora by Felipe Valencia (review)","authors":"Andrés Orejuela","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2022.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2022.0030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49370413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1