Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1177/21677026251317431
Katerina Zorina-Lichtenwalter, Carmen I Bango, Marta Čeko, Yoni K Ashar, Matthew C Keller, Tor D Wager, Naomi P Friedman
{"title":"Patterns of shared genetic risk between chronic pain, psychopathologies, and neuroticism.","authors":"Katerina Zorina-Lichtenwalter, Carmen I Bango, Marta Čeko, Yoni K Ashar, Matthew C Keller, Tor D Wager, Naomi P Friedman","doi":"10.1177/21677026251317431","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21677026251317431","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 5","pages":"933-950"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1177/21677026251358836
Benjamin Kaveladze, Arka Ghosh, Carter J Funkhouser, Stephen M Schueller, Jessica L Schleider
Online self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs), which provide a complete mental health intervention in one brief experience, promise to increase global access to evidence-based support. One way to expand current SSIs' reach is to shorten them, but doing so could also compromise their effectiveness. We conducted two randomized trials to test if shortening evidence-based SSIs reduces their efficacy among adult online workers facing mental health struggles. In study 1 (n = 262), the 8-minute "Overcoming Loneliness" SSI reduced loneliness over eight weeks more than a 23-minute version of it (b = 2.64; d = 0.22; 95% CI 0.02, 0.41; p = .03). In study 2 (n = 1,145), 15-minute, 9-minute, 5-minute, and 3-minute versions of the "Action Brings Change" SSI did not significantly differ in how much they affected depression eight weeks later (ps > .14). Our results suggest that longer digital SSIs are not necessarily more helpful than shorter ones.
在线自我指导单次干预(ssi)在一次简短的经历中提供完整的心理健康干预,有望增加全球获得循证支持的机会。扩大当前ssi覆盖范围的一种方法是缩短它们,但这样做也可能损害它们的有效性。我们进行了两项随机试验,以测试缩短基于证据的ssi是否会降低其在面临心理健康问题的成年在线工作者中的有效性。在研究1 (n = 262)中,8分钟的“克服孤独”SSI比23分钟的SSI在8周内减少了孤独感(b = 2.64; d = 0.22; 95% CI 0.02, 0.41; p = 0.03)。在研究2 (n = 1145)中,15分钟、9分钟、5分钟和3分钟版本的“行动带来改变”SSI在8周后对抑郁的影响程度上没有显著差异(ps >.14)。我们的研究结果表明,较长的数字ssi并不一定比较短的ssi更有帮助。
{"title":"Longer Single-Session Interventions May Not Be Better: Evidence From Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Online Workers Facing Mental-Health Struggles.","authors":"Benjamin Kaveladze, Arka Ghosh, Carter J Funkhouser, Stephen M Schueller, Jessica L Schleider","doi":"10.1177/21677026251358836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251358836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs), which provide a complete mental health intervention in one brief experience, promise to increase global access to evidence-based support. One way to expand current SSIs' reach is to shorten them, but doing so could also compromise their effectiveness. We conducted two randomized trials to test if shortening evidence-based SSIs reduces their efficacy among adult online workers facing mental health struggles. In study 1 (<i>n</i> = 262), the 8-minute \"Overcoming Loneliness\" SSI reduced loneliness over eight weeks more than a 23-minute version of it (<i>b</i> = 2.64; <i>d</i> = 0.22; 95% CI 0.02, 0.41; <i>p</i> = .03). In study 2 (<i>n</i> = 1,145), 15-minute, 9-minute, 5-minute, and 3-minute versions of the \"Action Brings Change\" SSI did not significantly differ in how much they affected depression eight weeks later (<i>p</i>s > .14). Our results suggest that longer digital SSIs are not necessarily more helpful than shorter ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-16DOI: 10.1177/21677026251356428
Chloe C Hudson, Lauren Rutter, Jutta Joormann, Eliza Passell, Rory M McKemey, Stacey L House, Francesca L Beaudoin, Xinming An, Jennifer S Stevens, Thomas C Neylan, Tanja Jovanovic, Sarah D Linnstaedt, Scott L Rauch, John P Haran, Alan B Storrow, Christopher Lewandowski, Paul I Musey, Phyllis L Hendry, Sophia Sheikh, Christopher W Jones, Brittany E Punches, Lauren A Hudak, Jose L Pascual, Mark J Seamon, Elizabeth M Datner, Claire Pearson, David A Peak, Roland C Merchant, Robert M Domeier, Niels K Rathlev, Brian J O'Neil, Paulina Sergot, Leon D Sanchez, Steven E Bruce, Steven E Harte, Ronald C Kessler, Karestan C Koenen, Samuel A McLean, Laura T Germine
Social cognition is an important mechanism linking trauma to psychopathology; however, current models fail to explain individual differences in social cognition after trauma exposure. We investigated whether the interpersonal nature of trauma exposure helps to explain variability in social cognitive outcomes. Our sample was derived from the AURORA study, a national initiative involving intensive follow-up of trauma survivors for one year. We analyzed data from 2241 participants (Mage = 35.12, 64% female, 54% Black) who experienced an assault (n = 262) or a motor vehicle collision (n = 1979). Social cognition was assessed with the Multiracial Emotion Identification Task and the Belmont Emotion Sensitivity Test. Overall emotion identification accuracy declined over time among participants who experienced interpersonal trauma (β = -.10, p = .03), but not non-interpersonal trauma (β = .00, p = .83). These results may help to enhance the prediction of psychopathological outcomes following trauma exposure.
社会认知是连接创伤与精神病理的重要机制;然而,目前的模型未能解释创伤暴露后社会认知的个体差异。我们调查了创伤暴露的人际性质是否有助于解释社会认知结果的可变性。我们的样本来自AURORA研究,这是一项国家倡议,涉及对创伤幸存者进行为期一年的密集随访。我们分析了2241名参与者(男性= 35.12,女性= 64%,黑人= 54%)的数据,他们经历了攻击(n = 262)或机动车碰撞(n = 1979)。采用多种族情绪识别任务和贝尔蒙特情绪敏感性测验评估社会认知。在经历过人际创伤的参与者中,情绪识别的整体准确性随着时间的推移而下降(β = - 0.10, p = .03),但非人际创伤的参与者没有下降(β = .00, p = .83)。这些结果可能有助于提高创伤暴露后精神病理结果的预测。
{"title":"Emotion identification and emotion sensitivity following interpersonal and non-interpersonal traumatic experiences: Results from the AURORA study.","authors":"Chloe C Hudson, Lauren Rutter, Jutta Joormann, Eliza Passell, Rory M McKemey, Stacey L House, Francesca L Beaudoin, Xinming An, Jennifer S Stevens, Thomas C Neylan, Tanja Jovanovic, Sarah D Linnstaedt, Scott L Rauch, John P Haran, Alan B Storrow, Christopher Lewandowski, Paul I Musey, Phyllis L Hendry, Sophia Sheikh, Christopher W Jones, Brittany E Punches, Lauren A Hudak, Jose L Pascual, Mark J Seamon, Elizabeth M Datner, Claire Pearson, David A Peak, Roland C Merchant, Robert M Domeier, Niels K Rathlev, Brian J O'Neil, Paulina Sergot, Leon D Sanchez, Steven E Bruce, Steven E Harte, Ronald C Kessler, Karestan C Koenen, Samuel A McLean, Laura T Germine","doi":"10.1177/21677026251356428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251356428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social cognition is an important mechanism linking trauma to psychopathology; however, current models fail to explain individual differences in social cognition after trauma exposure. We investigated whether the interpersonal nature of trauma exposure helps to explain variability in social cognitive outcomes. Our sample was derived from the AURORA study, a national initiative involving intensive follow-up of trauma survivors for one year. We analyzed data from 2241 participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 35.12, 64% female, 54% Black) who experienced an assault (<i>n</i> = 262) or a motor vehicle collision (<i>n</i> = 1979). Social cognition was assessed with the Multiracial Emotion Identification Task and the Belmont Emotion Sensitivity Test. Overall emotion identification accuracy declined over time among participants who experienced interpersonal trauma (β = -.10, <i>p</i> = .03), but not non-interpersonal trauma (β = .00, <i>p</i> = .83). These results may help to enhance the prediction of psychopathological outcomes following trauma exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-16DOI: 10.1177/21677026251357589
Connor Lawhead, Jamilah Silver, Thomas M Olino, Loïc Labache, Swanie Juhng, H Andrew Schwartz, Daniel N Klein
Current classification systems of psychopathology focus on cross-sectional symptomatology rather than continuity, discontinuity and comorbidity across development. Here, a community sample of 600 youth was assessed every 3 years from early childhood through late adolescence using semi-structured diagnostic interviews. We used longitudinal k-means clustering of joint-diagnostic trajectories to identify 6 distinct clusters (healthy, childhood anxiety, childhood/adolescent ADHD, adolescent depression/anxiety, adolescent depression/substance use, and early childhood disruptive behavior). When comparing psychopathology clusters to the healthy cluster on age 3 predictors (parental education and psychopathology, early environment, temperament, cognitive and social functioning) and age 18 functional outcomes, the clusters captured developmental patterning of psychopathology not apparent in cross-sectional nosology. The study serves as a proof of principle in applying a longitudinal clustering approach to common mental disorders, affording a rich perspective on the unfolding of sequential comorbidity and heterotypic continuity and identifying transdiagnostic subgroups with meaningful clinical, family, and temperamental correlates.
{"title":"Longitudinal Clustering of Psychopathology Across Childhood and Adolescence: An Approach Toward Developmentally Based Classification.","authors":"Connor Lawhead, Jamilah Silver, Thomas M Olino, Loïc Labache, Swanie Juhng, H Andrew Schwartz, Daniel N Klein","doi":"10.1177/21677026251357589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251357589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current classification systems of psychopathology focus on cross-sectional symptomatology rather than continuity, discontinuity and comorbidity across development. Here, a community sample of 600 youth was assessed every 3 years from early childhood through late adolescence using semi-structured diagnostic interviews. We used longitudinal <i>k</i>-means clustering of joint-diagnostic trajectories to identify 6 distinct clusters (healthy, childhood anxiety, childhood/adolescent ADHD, adolescent depression/anxiety, adolescent depression/substance use, and early childhood disruptive behavior). When comparing psychopathology clusters to the healthy cluster on age 3 predictors (parental education and psychopathology, early environment, temperament, cognitive and social functioning) and age 18 functional outcomes, the clusters captured developmental patterning of psychopathology not apparent in cross-sectional nosology. The study serves as a proof of principle in applying a longitudinal clustering approach to common mental disorders, affording a rich perspective on the unfolding of sequential comorbidity and heterotypic continuity and identifying transdiagnostic subgroups with meaningful clinical, family, and temperamental correlates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369591/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1177/21677026251359621
Noah J French, René Freichel, Sercan Kahveci, Alexandra Werntz, Jennifer L Howell, Kristen P Lindgren, Brian A O'Shea, Steven M Boker, Bethany A Teachman
Some studies suggest a rise in anxiety prevalence and severity over the past decade, particularly among emerging adults, while others report stable rates. This preregistered study examines trends in anxiety symptom severity and explicit (self-reported) and implicit (using the Brief Implicit Association Test) associations about the self as anxious vs. calm. Using continuous cross-sectional data from 99,973 U.S. adults who visited the Project Implicit Health website between 2011-2022, we compared trends in anxiety outcomes between emerging adults (age 18-25) and adults age 26+, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to hypotheses, average anxiety severity and strength of implicit/explicit self-as-anxious associations did not spike at the start of the pandemic, and rates of change did not significantly differ by age from 2011-2020, except for explicit, non-relative self-as-anxious ratings. Instead, anxiety mostly remained stable, with emerging adults exhibiting consistently higher anxiety symptom severity and stronger implicit/explicit self-as-anxious associations than adults age 26+.
{"title":"Anxiety Symptom Severity and Implicit and Explicit Self-As-Anxious Associations in a Large Online Sample of U.S. Adults: Trends From 2011 to 2022.","authors":"Noah J French, René Freichel, Sercan Kahveci, Alexandra Werntz, Jennifer L Howell, Kristen P Lindgren, Brian A O'Shea, Steven M Boker, Bethany A Teachman","doi":"10.1177/21677026251359621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251359621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some studies suggest a rise in anxiety prevalence and severity over the past decade, particularly among emerging adults, while others report stable rates. This preregistered study examines trends in anxiety symptom severity and explicit (self-reported) and implicit (using the Brief Implicit Association Test) associations about the self as anxious vs. calm. Using continuous cross-sectional data from 99,973 U.S. adults who visited the Project Implicit Health website between 2011-2022, we compared trends in anxiety outcomes between emerging adults (age 18-25) and adults age 26+, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to hypotheses, average anxiety severity and strength of implicit/explicit self-as-anxious associations did not spike at the start of the pandemic, and rates of change did not significantly differ by age from 2011-2020, except for explicit, non-relative self-as-anxious ratings. Instead, anxiety mostly remained stable, with emerging adults exhibiting consistently higher anxiety symptom severity and stronger implicit/explicit self-as-anxious associations than adults age 26+.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1177/21677026251351276
Antonio A Morgan-López, Shannon M Blakey, Stephen G West, Skye Fitzpatrick, Sonya B Norman, Therese K Killeen, Sudie E Back, Lissette M Saavedra, Alexander C Kline, Teresa López-Castro, Denise A Hien
Making causal statements regarding dose-response in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol/other drug use disorders (AODs; PTSD+AOD) is difficult because (a) dosage is rarely randomized and (b) self-selected dosage can be affected by treatment assignment. In the present study, we sought to clarify causal inferences regarding treatment-by-dosage interactions in PTSD+AOD treatment using Project Harmony, an individual-patient meta-analytic data set of behavioral, pharmacological, and combination PTSD+AOD treatments (k = 36; N = 4,046). Using propensity score weighting and moderated multilevel "net treatment difference" modeling, trauma-focused (TF) treatments, whether integrated or nonintegrated with AOD treatment, outperformed treatment as usual by greater margins on reductions in PTSD and alcohol use as dosage increased. Furthermore, appropriately treating dosage as a posttreatment covariate and moderator revealed effects for TF treatments on drug use that had not been detected in previous studies. Implications for approaches to increasing TF-treatment attendance and greater use of causal-inference methodologies with dose-response analyses are discussed.
对治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和酒精/其他药物使用障碍(AOD; PTSD+AOD)的剂量反应作出因果陈述是困难的,因为(a)剂量很少是随机的,(b)自我选择的剂量可能受到治疗分配的影响。在本研究中,我们试图通过Project Harmony(一个包含行为、药理学和PTSD+AOD联合治疗的个体患者荟萃分析数据集)来澄清PTSD+AOD治疗中按剂量治疗相互作用的因果关系(k = 36; N = 4046)。使用倾向评分加权和适度的多层次“净治疗差异”模型,创伤聚焦(TF)治疗,无论是与AOD治疗结合还是不结合,在减少PTSD和酒精使用方面,都比常规治疗有更大的优势。此外,适当处理剂量作为治疗后协变量和调节因子,揭示了TF治疗对药物使用的影响,这在以前的研究中未被发现。讨论了增加tf治疗出勤率和更多使用因果推理方法与剂量-反应分析的方法的含义。
{"title":"A Framework for Estimating Posttreatment Moderation of Treatment-by-Dosage Effects in Individual-Patient Meta-Analysis: An Illustration Using Project Harmony.","authors":"Antonio A Morgan-López, Shannon M Blakey, Stephen G West, Skye Fitzpatrick, Sonya B Norman, Therese K Killeen, Sudie E Back, Lissette M Saavedra, Alexander C Kline, Teresa López-Castro, Denise A Hien","doi":"10.1177/21677026251351276","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21677026251351276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Making causal statements regarding dose-response in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol/other drug use disorders (AODs; PTSD+AOD) is difficult because (a) dosage is rarely randomized and (b) self-selected dosage can be affected by treatment assignment. In the present study, we sought to clarify causal inferences regarding treatment-by-dosage interactions in PTSD+AOD treatment using Project Harmony, an individual-patient meta-analytic data set of behavioral, pharmacological, and combination PTSD+AOD treatments (<i>k</i> = 36; <i>N</i> = 4,046). Using propensity score weighting and moderated multilevel \"net treatment difference\" modeling, trauma-focused (TF) treatments, whether integrated or nonintegrated with AOD treatment, outperformed treatment as usual by greater margins on reductions in PTSD and alcohol use as dosage increased. Furthermore, appropriately treating dosage as a posttreatment covariate and moderator revealed effects for TF treatments on drug use that had not been detected in previous studies. Implications for approaches to increasing TF-treatment attendance and greater use of causal-inference methodologies with dose-response analyses are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768495/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-27DOI: 10.1177/21677026251351850
Adrienne L Romer, Nicholas A Hubbard, Randy P Auerbach, Anastasia Yendiki, Satrajit Ghosh, Aude Henin, Stefan G Hofmann, John D E Gabrieli, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Diego A Pizzagalli
Brain structural alterations have been associated with internalizing symptoms concurrently. Less is known about whether these alterations relate to change in internalizing psychopathology during adolescence, a sensitive period for the effects of stress on neurodevelopment and internalizing symptoms. We examined whether cortical thickness (CT) was prospectively related to change in an internalizing factor in 203 adolescents (aged 14-17) with depression and/or anxiety diagnoses or no diagnosis from the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety study. We conducted residualized change regression models to determine whether baseline CT was associated with one-year change in internalizing factor scores, and whether chronic stress exposure moderated these relations. Lower bilateral temporal pole and left insula CT were associated with one-year increases in internalizing factor scores and were moderated by chronic stress. These novel results identify specific cortical structure features that might contribute to worsening depression and anxiety, particularly in adolescents with high chronic stress.
{"title":"Prospective Relations between Cortical Thickness and Change in Internalizing Symptoms are Moderated by Chronic Stress Exposure in Adolescents with Depression and Anxiety.","authors":"Adrienne L Romer, Nicholas A Hubbard, Randy P Auerbach, Anastasia Yendiki, Satrajit Ghosh, Aude Henin, Stefan G Hofmann, John D E Gabrieli, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Diego A Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1177/21677026251351850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251351850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain structural alterations have been associated with internalizing symptoms concurrently. Less is known about whether these alterations relate to change in internalizing psychopathology during adolescence, a sensitive period for the effects of stress on neurodevelopment and internalizing symptoms. We examined whether cortical thickness (CT) was prospectively related to change in an internalizing factor in 203 adolescents (aged 14-17) with depression and/or anxiety diagnoses or no diagnosis from the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety study. We conducted residualized change regression models to determine whether baseline CT was associated with one-year change in internalizing factor scores, and whether chronic stress exposure moderated these relations. Lower bilateral temporal pole and left insula CT were associated with one-year increases in internalizing factor scores and were moderated by chronic stress. These novel results identify specific cortical structure features that might contribute to worsening depression and anxiety, particularly in adolescents with high chronic stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-12DOI: 10.1177/21677026251344172
Janet M Lopez, Sophie Lohmann, Yara Mekawi, Colleen Hughes, Aashna Sunderrajan, Chinmayi Tengshe, Aishwarya Rajesh, Dolores Albarracín
In this meta-analysis, we synthesized existing research on perseverative negative thinking, self-control, and executive functioning to better define their etiologic role in symptoms of depression and anxiety. After a review of leading models of perseverative negative thinking, self-control, executive functioning, and depressive and anxious symptoms, the relevant associations were meta-analyzed as reported in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. A total of 223 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing 239 independent samples (28 of which provided longitudinal data), N = 50,987. According to both longitudinal and cross-sectional path analyses, self-control deficits predict depression and anxiety symptoms, and these symptoms then predict perseverative negative thinking. In the present research synthesis, we identified evidence that reduced self-control predicts increases in depressive and anxious symptoms, which, in turn, lead to perseverative negative thinking. All in all, this finding suggests an opportunity to treat depression and anxiety through training of self-control and emotional-regulation strategies.
{"title":"Perseverative Negative Thinking, Self-Control, and Executive Functioning in Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Competing Models.","authors":"Janet M Lopez, Sophie Lohmann, Yara Mekawi, Colleen Hughes, Aashna Sunderrajan, Chinmayi Tengshe, Aishwarya Rajesh, Dolores Albarracín","doi":"10.1177/21677026251344172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251344172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this meta-analysis, we synthesized existing research on perseverative negative thinking, self-control, and executive functioning to better define their etiologic role in symptoms of depression and anxiety. After a review of leading models of perseverative negative thinking, self-control, executive functioning, and depressive and anxious symptoms, the relevant associations were meta-analyzed as reported in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. A total of 223 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing 239 independent samples (28 of which provided longitudinal data), <i>N</i> = 50,987. According to both longitudinal and cross-sectional path analyses, self-control deficits predict depression and anxiety symptoms, and these symptoms then predict perseverative negative thinking. In the present research synthesis, we identified evidence that reduced self-control predicts increases in depressive and anxious symptoms, which, in turn, lead to perseverative negative thinking. All in all, this finding suggests an opportunity to treat depression and anxiety through training of self-control and emotional-regulation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1177/21677026241305377
Matthew V Elliott, Ming Hsu, Lucina Q Uddin, Kiana Modavi, Sheri L Johnson
Emotion-related impulsivity (ERI) shows robust longitudinal associations with psychiatric disorders, aggression, and suicidality, yet a parsimonious account of its neurocognitive correlates has not been offered. We connect ERI with the Glutamate Amplifies Noradrenergic Effects (GANE) model, a framework describing how norepinephrine tunes "hotspots" of brain activation during heightened physiological arousal. First, we systematically reviewed studies of ERI and task-based functional MRI. Meta-analysis of significant effects yielded one cluster in right inferior frontal gyrus. 26 of 30 significant effects systematically co-localized in neuroanatomical "hotspots" in each corresponding task, in line with GANE. Second, adults recruited for a range of psychopathology (n = 120) completed a reward/punishment Go No-Go task while undergoing functional MRI. ERI correlated with stronger nucleus accumbens activation for a model sensitive to heightened trial reward and in anterior cingulate for models sensitive to heightened trial arousal. Findings provide empirical support for the relevance of GANE "hotspot" mechanisms to ERI.
{"title":"Introducing the Glutamate-Amplifies-Noradrenergic-Effects (GANE) Model to the Neurocognitive Study of Emotion-Related Impulsivity.","authors":"Matthew V Elliott, Ming Hsu, Lucina Q Uddin, Kiana Modavi, Sheri L Johnson","doi":"10.1177/21677026241305377","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21677026241305377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion-related impulsivity (ERI) shows robust longitudinal associations with psychiatric disorders, aggression, and suicidality, yet a parsimonious account of its neurocognitive correlates has not been offered. We connect ERI with the Glutamate Amplifies Noradrenergic Effects (GANE) model, a framework describing how norepinephrine tunes \"hotspots\" of brain activation during heightened physiological arousal. First, we systematically reviewed studies of ERI and task-based functional MRI. Meta-analysis of significant effects yielded one cluster in right inferior frontal gyrus. 26 of 30 significant effects systematically co-localized in neuroanatomical \"hotspots\" in each corresponding task, in line with GANE. Second, adults recruited for a range of psychopathology (<i>n</i> = 120) completed a reward/punishment Go No-Go task while undergoing functional MRI. ERI correlated with stronger nucleus accumbens activation for a model sensitive to heightened trial reward and in anterior cingulate for models sensitive to heightened trial arousal. Findings provide empirical support for the relevance of GANE \"hotspot\" mechanisms to ERI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 4","pages":"810-834"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144790708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-02-05DOI: 10.1177/21677026241304339
Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz
The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.
{"title":"Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.","authors":"Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1177/21677026241304339","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21677026241304339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 4","pages":"720-739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312666/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144762337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}