Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1037/xan0000408
Evan J Livesey, Yvonne Y Chan, Shu Chen, Hilary J Don
Recently, a principle known as theory protection has been proposed to explain the way people bias the updating of their beliefs when they encounter new information about ambiguous cues. This principle presents an alternative to the proposal that a combination of individual and summed prediction error contributes to learning in situations where combinations of predictive cues are presented as potential causes of an outcome. Here, we discuss similarities between the notion of theory protection and attention shifting models of learning that assume attention is guided by individual prediction error. We report simulations using a prominent attention shifting model in the category learning literature and show that it accounts for several of the key examples of theory protection. The basis of these learning biases, hypothesized to be determined by either cue uncertainty or prediction error, is yet to be determined and requires further tests that dissociate these factors more clearly. It may be the case that theory protection is better understood as an organizing principle for knowledge updating rather than a single psychological mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
最近,一个被称为理论保护的原则被提出来解释人们在遇到关于模糊线索的新信息时倾向于更新他们的信念的方式。这一原则提出了另一种建议,即在预测线索组合作为结果的潜在原因呈现的情况下,个体和汇总预测误差的组合有助于学习。在这里,我们讨论了理论保护概念和学习的注意转移模型之间的相似性,这些模型假设注意是由个体预测误差引导的。我们报告了在类别学习文献中使用一个突出的注意力转移模型的模拟,并表明它解释了理论保护的几个关键例子。这些学习偏差的基础,假设是由提示不确定性或预测误差决定的,尚未确定,需要进一步的测试来更清楚地分离这些因素。或许理论保护更应该被理解为知识更新的一种组织原则,而不是一种单一的心理机制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Attention and prediction error as mechanisms for theory protection?","authors":"Evan J Livesey, Yvonne Y Chan, Shu Chen, Hilary J Don","doi":"10.1037/xan0000408","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, a principle known as theory protection has been proposed to explain the way people bias the updating of their beliefs when they encounter new information about ambiguous cues. This principle presents an alternative to the proposal that a combination of individual and summed prediction error contributes to learning in situations where combinations of predictive cues are presented as potential causes of an outcome. Here, we discuss similarities between the notion of theory protection and attention shifting models of learning that assume attention is guided by individual prediction error. We report simulations using a prominent attention shifting model in the category learning literature and show that it accounts for several of the key examples of theory protection. The basis of these learning biases, hypothesized to be determined by either cue uncertainty or prediction error, is yet to be determined and requires further tests that dissociate these factors more clearly. It may be the case that theory protection is better understood as an organizing principle for knowledge updating rather than a single psychological mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"169-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145193759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1037/xan0000402
Ciro Civile, Yizhen Shen, Siobhan McCourt, Guangtong Wang, I P L McLaren
We report three large experiments (n = 440 in total) investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at Fp3 on perceptual learning indexed by the face inversion effect (FIE). Experiments employed a double-blinded design, with participants randomly allocated to different tDCS groups. They then participated in an old/new recognition task involving both upright and inverted faces. Consistent with previous research, our findings indicate that anodal tDCS reduces the FIE compared to sham tDCS/control by impairing the recognition performance of upright faces. Crucially, our experiments introduced novel evidence suggesting that cathodal tDCS at Fp3 can reverse the effects of anodal tDCS, thereby restoring the FIE and performance for upright faces to typical levels. Across all three experiments, participants who received anodal tDCS followed by cathodal tDCS exhibited no reduction in the FIE nor impaired performance for upright faces. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that participants who only received cathodal tDCS showed no difference in the FIE compared to the sham/control group. This indicates that the effects of cathodal tDCS are specific to reversing the negative impact of anodal tDCS rather than affecting baseline performance. These results underscore that the detrimental effects of anodal tDCS on the FIE can be reversed through the application of cathodal tDCS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们报告了三个大型实验(n = 440),研究Fp3时经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对面部反转效应(FIE)索引的感知学习的影响。实验采用双盲设计,参与者随机分配到不同的tDCS组。然后,他们参与了一项新旧识别任务,其中包括正脸和倒立脸。与之前的研究一致,我们的研究结果表明,与假tDCS/对照相比,阳极tDCS通过损害直立面部的识别性能来降低FIE。至关重要的是,我们的实验引入了新的证据,表明Fp3的阴极tDCS可以逆转阳极tDCS的影响,从而将直立面部的FIE和表现恢复到典型水平。在所有三个实验中,接受正极tDCS后再接受正极tDCS的参与者没有表现出FIE的减少,也没有表现出直立面部的表现受损。此外,实验2和3表明,仅接受阴极tDCS的参与者在FIE上与假手术/对照组相比没有差异。这表明,阴极tDCS的效果是特定的,以扭转阳极tDCS的负面影响,而不是影响基线性能。这些结果强调,阳极tDCS对FIE的有害影响可以通过应用阴极tDCS来逆转。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Modulating perceptual learning: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces the face inversion effect (FIE), while cathodal tDCS restores it to baseline.","authors":"Ciro Civile, Yizhen Shen, Siobhan McCourt, Guangtong Wang, I P L McLaren","doi":"10.1037/xan0000402","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report three large experiments (<i>n</i> = 440 in total) investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at Fp3 on perceptual learning indexed by the face inversion effect (FIE). Experiments employed a double-blinded design, with participants randomly allocated to different tDCS groups. They then participated in an old/new recognition task involving both upright and inverted faces. Consistent with previous research, our findings indicate that anodal tDCS reduces the FIE compared to sham tDCS/control by impairing the recognition performance of upright faces. Crucially, our experiments introduced novel evidence suggesting that cathodal tDCS at Fp3 can reverse the effects of anodal tDCS, thereby restoring the FIE and performance for upright faces to typical levels. Across all three experiments, participants who received anodal tDCS followed by cathodal tDCS exhibited no reduction in the FIE nor impaired performance for upright faces. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that participants who only received cathodal tDCS showed no difference in the FIE compared to the sham/control group. This indicates that the effects of cathodal tDCS are specific to reversing the negative impact of anodal tDCS rather than affecting baseline performance. These results underscore that the detrimental effects of anodal tDCS on the FIE can be reversed through the application of cathodal tDCS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"220-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giselle M Castañeda, José E Burgos, Jonathan Buriticá, Oscar García-Leal
This study explores the role of convergent versus independent pathways in a neural network model to simulate blocking (Blk) and second-order conditioning (SOC). Convergent connections refer to the intersection of connections from one hidden layer unit to an adjacent unit in feedforward neural networks, whereas independent pathways involve exclusive, nonconverging connections. This research compares five network architectures with varying degrees of convergent connectivity in SOC and Blk. These phenomena are relevant as they illustrate how prior reinforcement history influences learning about a second stimulus, either by enhancing or inhibiting the conditioned response to it. The findings indicate that networks with convergent connections better replicate Blk than SOC, whereas those with independent pathways more accurately model SOC than Blk. Some exceptions were observed, which may have implications for the conceptual analysis of deep learning models. Future work could incorporate theoretical insights into the underlying mechanisms of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response associations. Additionally, the findings from this study could inform model-driven hypotheses in neurobehavioral research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究探讨了收敛路径与独立路径在模拟阻断(Blk)和二阶条件反射(SOC)的神经网络模型中的作用。收敛连接是指前馈神经网络中从一个隐藏层单元到相邻单元的连接的交集,而独立路径涉及排他的、非收敛的连接。本研究比较了SOC和block中具有不同程度收敛连接的五种网络架构。这些现象是相关的,因为它们说明了先前的强化历史如何通过增强或抑制对第二刺激的条件反应来影响对第二刺激的学习。研究结果表明,具有收敛连接的网络比具有SOC的网络更能复制Blk,而具有独立通路的网络比具有Blk的网络更能准确地模拟SOC。观察到一些例外,这可能对深度学习模型的概念分析产生影响。未来的工作可能会将理论见解纳入刺激-刺激和刺激-反应关联的潜在机制。此外,这项研究的发现可以为神经行为研究中的模型驱动假设提供信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Comparison of convergent and independent pathways in neural networks during second-order conditioning and blocking procedures.","authors":"Giselle M Castañeda, José E Burgos, Jonathan Buriticá, Oscar García-Leal","doi":"10.1037/xan0000413","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the role of convergent versus independent pathways in a neural network model to simulate blocking (Blk) and second-order conditioning (SOC). Convergent connections refer to the intersection of connections from one hidden layer unit to an adjacent unit in feedforward neural networks, whereas independent pathways involve exclusive, nonconverging connections. This research compares five network architectures with varying degrees of convergent connectivity in SOC and Blk. These phenomena are relevant as they illustrate how prior reinforcement history influences learning about a second stimulus, either by enhancing or inhibiting the conditioned response to it. The findings indicate that networks with convergent connections better replicate Blk than SOC, whereas those with independent pathways more accurately model SOC than Blk. Some exceptions were observed, which may have implications for the conceptual analysis of deep learning models. Future work could incorporate theoretical insights into the underlying mechanisms of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response associations. Additionally, the findings from this study could inform model-driven hypotheses in neurobehavioral research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"51 4","pages":"181-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Binz et al. (2025) describe several ways that Centaur-a new computational model that "captures" human behavior better than alternatives-can help develop a new unified theory of cognition. In this commentary, we evaluate several of these roles in light of recent achievements and empirical data, recommending increasingly explicit scrutiny of the various modeling roles that Centaur might play in developing new explanatory theories of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Binz等人(2025)描述了centaur——一种比其他选择更好地“捕捉”人类行为的新计算模型——可以帮助开发一种新的统一认知理论的几种方式。在这篇评论中,我们根据最近的成就和经验数据评估了其中的几个角色,建议对Centaur在发展新的人类认知解释理论中可能发挥的各种建模作用进行越来越明确的审查。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"\"Captured\" by centaur: Opaque predictions or process insights?","authors":"Phillip H Kieval, Cameron Buckner","doi":"10.1037/xan0000410","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Binz et al. (2025) describe several ways that <i>Centaur</i>-a new computational model that \"captures\" human behavior better than alternatives-can help develop a new unified theory of cognition. In this commentary, we evaluate several of these roles in light of recent achievements and empirical data, recommending increasingly explicit scrutiny of the various modeling roles that Centaur might play in developing new explanatory theories of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145193748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Black garden ants Lasius niger become more aggressive with repeated encounters of ants from another nest. Recent experimental evidence suggests that associative learning contributes to holding such a "grudge." (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
评论一篇文章由msamulanie Bey等人(2025)。Bey等人最近的一项研究表明,黑园蚁(Lasius niger)也依靠经典条件反射来对抗外来同种蚂蚁。这项研究进一步揭示了经典条件反射在蚂蚁生活中的作用。在德国弗莱堡Volker Nehring小组的研究中,Bey等人首次在实地记录了在焦点巢穴周围30米范围内,焦点蚂蚁对来自附近巢穴的非巢友的攻击比来自更远巢穴的蚂蚁更具攻击性。第一个控制可以被称为非条件刺激(US)条件。训练有素的蚂蚁被暴露在一个陌生巢穴的蚂蚁面前,这个巢穴的蚂蚁是训练有素的蚂蚁以前从未遇到过的。如果仅仅暴露在US环境中就会导致更有攻击性的打斗,而不考虑条件刺激(CS)-US的关联,那么经过训练的焦点蚂蚁应该从第一次遇到来自未知巢穴的蚂蚁时就具有攻击性。暴露在一个未知的非巢蚁(作者称这组蚂蚁为非巢蚁)面前,并不比暴露在一个巢蚁面前更容易引发攻击性。这是一个成功的、有启发性的控制。一个不太成功的控制是所谓的CS-only条件。作者想把焦点蚂蚁暴露在一个巢穴中没有攻击性的成员中。科学家们通过切除它们的触角来安抚这些不筑巢的蚂蚁,触角中包含着用来闻其他蚂蚁的化学传感器。没有感觉到焦点蚂蚁中有陌生的蚂蚁,这些失去知觉的刺激蚂蚁保持不具攻击性。在多次遇到不具攻击性的蚂蚁后,当被攻击的蚂蚁与来自同一巢穴的一个完整的已知非巢蚁进行测试时——这些刺激蚂蚁确实会打架——被测试的蚂蚁只表现出低水平的攻击性。这种控制的问题在于膜翅目昆虫的触角不仅是嗅觉和味觉的感受器,而且还充满了化学物质和碳氢化合物,人们常说这些化学物质和碳氢化合物显示了巢穴的嗅觉特征。Bey等人的讨厌邻居研究显示了一个厌恶条件反射的案例。关于黑园蚁的讨厌邻居效应,有一个悬而未决的问题是功能性的:讨厌邻居是有益的吗?也许对邻居的攻击性会让对手甚至不敢接近对方,从而节省时间和精力。也许这对领土防御很重要。总之,蚂蚁已经被证明可以学习很多东西。Bey等人的研究强烈表明,经典条件反射形式的联想学习也有助于黑园蚁更好地对抗陌生蚂蚁。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Associative learning helps ants to hold grudges.","authors":"Ken Cheng","doi":"10.1037/xan0000404","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black garden ants <i>Lasius niger</i> become more aggressive with repeated encounters of ants from another nest. Recent experimental evidence suggests that associative learning contributes to holding such a \"grudge.\" (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Estibaliz Herrera, Joe M Austen, Gonzalo P Urcelay
Previous studies involving birds and humans have identified spatial proximity as a source of overshadowing between landmarks in navigation. In Herrera et al. (2024), subjects were trained in an open environment to locate a hidden goal with reference to an array of four landmarks placed at varying distances from it. Critically, two of the four landmarks (i.e., target landmarks) were placed at distances that were common among groups, whereas the remaining two were either proximal to, or distal from, them. Landmarks near the goal overshadowed (i.e., competed with) learning about the further ones, and this effect disappeared in the groups trained with distal landmarks. However, neither of these studies included a control group providing a baseline performance to assess the extent of competition; were the data indicative of overshadowing or facilitation of learning? Thus, we assessed whether spatial proximity determines overshadowing or facilitation between landmarks, including a control group trained with the target landmarks only. We conducted three experiments with varying training lengths: six training trials in Experiments 1 and 16 in Experiments 2 and 3. We also extended the landmark-goal distance in Experiment 3. In all experiments, we observed overshadowing in groups trained with closer nontarget landmarks (relative to the target) but no overshadowing when the nontarget landmarks were distal from the target landmarks. Overall, these experiments reveal that landmark-goal distance determines overshadowing between landmarks, a finding consistent with domain-general theories of learning, such as a modification of Pearce's configural model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前对鸟类和人类的研究已经确定,空间接近是导航中地标之间阴影的来源。在Herrera et al.(2024)中,受试者在开放环境中接受训练,根据放置在不同距离上的四个地标阵列来定位隐藏的目标。关键的是,四个地标中的两个(即目标地标)被放置在群体之间常见的距离上,而其余两个要么是近端,要么是远端。目标附近的地标掩盖了(即与之竞争)对更远的目标的学习,这种影响在用远端地标训练的小组中消失了。然而,这两项研究都没有包括一个提供基线表现来评估竞争程度的对照组;这些数据是对学习的影响还是促进了学习?因此,我们评估了空间接近是否决定了地标之间的遮蔽或便利,包括仅用目标地标训练的对照组。我们进行了三个不同训练长度的实验:实验1中有6个训练试验,实验2和3中有16个训练试验。我们还在实验3中延长了地标到目标的距离。在所有实验中,我们观察到在非目标标记(相对于目标)较近的组中出现阴影,而在非目标标记距离目标标记远的组中没有出现阴影。总的来说,这些实验揭示了里程碑-目标距离决定了里程碑之间的阴影,这一发现与学习的领域一般理论一致,例如皮尔斯的结构模型的修改。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Spatial proximity determines overshadowing between landmarks in human spatial navigation.","authors":"Estibaliz Herrera, Joe M Austen, Gonzalo P Urcelay","doi":"10.1037/xan0000398","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies involving birds and humans have identified spatial proximity as a source of overshadowing between landmarks in navigation. In Herrera et al. (2024), subjects were trained in an open environment to locate a hidden goal with reference to an array of four landmarks placed at varying distances from it. Critically, two of the four landmarks (i.e., target landmarks) were placed at distances that were common among groups, whereas the remaining two were either proximal to, or distal from, them. Landmarks near the goal overshadowed (i.e., competed with) learning about the further ones, and this effect disappeared in the groups trained with distal landmarks. However, neither of these studies included a control group providing a baseline performance to assess the extent of competition; were the data indicative of overshadowing or facilitation of learning? Thus, we assessed whether spatial proximity determines overshadowing or facilitation between landmarks, including a control group trained with the target landmarks only. We conducted three experiments with varying training lengths: six training trials in Experiments 1 and 16 in Experiments 2 and 3. We also extended the landmark-goal distance in Experiment 3. In all experiments, we observed overshadowing in groups trained with closer nontarget landmarks (relative to the target) but no overshadowing when the nontarget landmarks were distal from the target landmarks. Overall, these experiments reveal that landmark-goal distance determines overshadowing between landmarks, a finding consistent with domain-general theories of learning, such as a modification of Pearce's configural model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"51 3","pages":"113-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-12DOI: 10.1037/xan0000396
David J Sanderson, Joseph M Austen, Anthony McGregor, Jasmin A Strickland
Trial-based theories of associative learning propose that learning is sensitive to the probability of reinforcement signaled by a conditioned stimulus (CS). Learning, however, is often sensitive to reinforcement rate rather than probability of reinforcement per trial, suggesting that temporal properties of cues may be more important than trial-based properties. In four experiments, the role of probability of reinforcement per trial was examined in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in mice under conditions in which reinforcement rate was controlled. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the loss of conditioned responding caused by overexpectation of reinforcement. The probability of reinforcement per trial failed to affect acquisition and summation of conditioned responding and failed to affect overexpectation. It also failed to affect extinction of conditioned responding in Experiments 3 and 4. Experiments 2-4 contained nonreinforced trials in which responding at the offset of the CS could be measured. These probe trials did reveal an effect of probability of reinforcement per trial. Cues associated with 100% reinforcement elicited greater post-CS responding than cues associated with 50% reinforcement. The effect was also evident in summation trials (in Experiment 2) in which two 100% or 50% reinforced cues were presented in compound. The results show that mice learn about rate and probability information, but reinforcement rate determines anticipatory responding during the CS. The probability of reinforcement determines responding at the expected time of reinforcement. Thus, learning occurs continuously over the duration of experience and per episode of experience independent of duration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
基于实验的联想学习理论提出,学习对条件刺激(CS)发出的强化信号的概率敏感。然而,学习通常对强化率而不是每次试验的强化概率敏感,这表明线索的时间特性可能比基于试验的特性更重要。在四个实验中,研究了每次强化概率在控制强化率条件下小鼠食欲巴甫洛夫条件反射中的作用。实验1和实验2考察了过度期望强化导致的条件反应丧失。每次强化的概率对条件反应的习得和求和没有影响,对过度期望没有影响。在实验3和实验4中,它也没有影响条件反应的消退。实验2-4包含非强化试验,其中可以测量CS偏移处的响应。这些探针试验确实揭示了每次试验强化概率的影响。与50%强化相关的线索相比,100%强化相关的线索引发了更大的后cs反应。在综合实验(实验2)中,两个100%或50%强化的线索以复合形式呈现,这种效应也很明显。结果表明,小鼠学习了速率和概率信息,但强化率决定了预期反应。强化的概率决定了在预期的强化时间响应。因此,学习在经历的持续时间内不断发生,每一段经历与持续时间无关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Probability and rate of reinforcement in negative prediction error learning.","authors":"David J Sanderson, Joseph M Austen, Anthony McGregor, Jasmin A Strickland","doi":"10.1037/xan0000396","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trial-based theories of associative learning propose that learning is sensitive to the probability of reinforcement signaled by a conditioned stimulus (CS). Learning, however, is often sensitive to reinforcement rate rather than probability of reinforcement per trial, suggesting that temporal properties of cues may be more important than trial-based properties. In four experiments, the role of probability of reinforcement per trial was examined in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in mice under conditions in which reinforcement rate was controlled. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the loss of conditioned responding caused by overexpectation of reinforcement. The probability of reinforcement per trial failed to affect acquisition and summation of conditioned responding and failed to affect overexpectation. It also failed to affect extinction of conditioned responding in Experiments 3 and 4. Experiments 2-4 contained nonreinforced trials in which responding at the offset of the CS could be measured. These probe trials did reveal an effect of probability of reinforcement per trial. Cues associated with 100% reinforcement elicited greater post-CS responding than cues associated with 50% reinforcement. The effect was also evident in summation trials (in Experiment 2) in which two 100% or 50% reinforced cues were presented in compound. The results show that mice learn about rate and probability information, but reinforcement rate determines anticipatory responding during the CS. The probability of reinforcement determines responding at the expected time of reinforcement. Thus, learning occurs continuously over the duration of experience and per episode of experience independent of duration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"126-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144058474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Concepción Paredes-Olay, M Mar Carpio-Cruz, David Reyes-Jiménez, Sergio Iglesias-Parro
This study investigated the effects of habituation to different light intensities on the head retraction response in the earthworm Dendrobaena veneta using a t1-t2 experimental design. Twenty-four adult earthworms were randomly assigned to two groups, each habituated with either 700 lux or 6,300 lux light (80 trials). Head retraction responses to 700, 2,100, and 6,300 lux were measured in pre- and posthabituation phases, with stimuli presented in a pseudorandomized order. Statistical analyses showed that, prior to habituation, responsiveness increased with light intensity across all subjects. During habituation, both groups exhibited significant declines in responsiveness, but the group exposed to 6,300 lux showed a steeper and more sustained decrease compared to the 700 lux group. Posthabituation testing demonstrated that worms habituated with 6,300 lux exhibited a generalized reduction in responsiveness across all test intensities, whereas the 700 lux group maintained an intensity-dependent response pattern. These findings challenge the traditional view that lower stimulus intensity leads to stronger habituation and instead indicate that higher intensity stimuli can produce more generalized and persistent habituation effects. The results emphasize the importance of distinguishing between learning and performance in habituation studies and highlight the value of standardized procedures for comparative research on nonassociative learning in invertebrates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究采用t1-t2实验设计,研究了不同光强度下蚯蚓的适应对蚓头收缩反应的影响。24只成年蚯蚓被随机分为两组,每组分别适应700勒克斯或6300勒克斯的光照(80次试验)。头部在700、2100和6300勒克斯时的缩回反应在复位前和复位后被测量,刺激以伪随机顺序呈现。统计分析表明,在适应之前,所有受试者的反应性都随着光强度的增加而增加。在适应过程中,两组人的反应能力都明显下降,但与700勒克斯组相比,暴露在6300勒克斯组的反应能力下降幅度更大,持续时间更长。适应后测试表明,习惯了6300勒克斯的线虫在所有测试强度下都表现出普遍的反应性降低,而700勒克斯组则保持着强度依赖的反应模式。这些发现挑战了低刺激强度导致更强习惯化的传统观点,相反表明高强度刺激可以产生更广泛和持续的习惯化效应。研究结果强调了在习惯化研究中区分学习和表现的重要性,并强调了标准化程序对无脊椎动物非联想学习比较研究的价值。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Effects of habituation to different light intensities on the head retraction response in earthworms (Dendrobaena veneta).","authors":"Concepción Paredes-Olay, M Mar Carpio-Cruz, David Reyes-Jiménez, Sergio Iglesias-Parro","doi":"10.1037/xan0000401","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of habituation to different light intensities on the head retraction response in the earthworm Dendrobaena veneta using a t1-t2 experimental design. Twenty-four adult earthworms were randomly assigned to two groups, each habituated with either 700 lux or 6,300 lux light (80 trials). Head retraction responses to 700, 2,100, and 6,300 lux were measured in pre- and posthabituation phases, with stimuli presented in a pseudorandomized order. Statistical analyses showed that, prior to habituation, responsiveness increased with light intensity across all subjects. During habituation, both groups exhibited significant declines in responsiveness, but the group exposed to 6,300 lux showed a steeper and more sustained decrease compared to the 700 lux group. Posthabituation testing demonstrated that worms habituated with 6,300 lux exhibited a generalized reduction in responsiveness across all test intensities, whereas the 700 lux group maintained an intensity-dependent response pattern. These findings challenge the traditional view that lower stimulus intensity leads to stronger habituation and instead indicate that higher intensity stimuli can produce more generalized and persistent habituation effects. The results emphasize the importance of distinguishing between learning and performance in habituation studies and highlight the value of standardized procedures for comparative research on nonassociative learning in invertebrates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"51 3","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emery W Harlan, Eric A Thrailkill, John T Green, Mark E Bouton
Previous research on Pavlovian conditioning has shown that the duration of the intertrial interval (ITI) can function like a contextual stimulus, modulating responding to an upcoming conditioned stimulus. Here, four operant learning experiments with rats investigated whether ITIs can similarly modulate operant responding occasioned by a discriminative stimulus (SD). In Experiment 1, responding for one group was reinforced during a 10-s SD when it was preceded by a 4-min ITI but not when it was preceded by a 1-min ITI (4+/1- discrimination). A second group had the opposite discrimination, 1+/4-. As seen with Pavlovian conditioning, rats could acquire discriminative control with the 4+/1- but not with the 1+/4- discrimination. Additional experiments investigated whether control by a temporal context in the 4+/1- discrimination transfers across physical contexts (i.e., the context provided by the operant chamber). In Experiment 2, rats learned the 4+/1- discrimination in one context (Context A), and the discrimination failed to transfer to a different context (Context B). In Experiment 3, the 4+/1- discrimination also failed to transfer to Context B when experience with reinforcers was equated across contexts. Experiment 4 found evidence of transfer, however, when rats had learned a second, nontemporal discrimination, in Context B. Overall, the findings suggest that ITI duration can acquire conditional control of discriminated operants in a manner similar to Pavlovian conditioned responses. The ITI arguably sets the occasion for a stimulus that itself sets the occasion for responding. Moreover, the control created by time can transfer across physical contexts under some conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前对巴甫洛夫条件反射的研究表明,间歇期(ITI)的持续时间可以像上下文刺激一样发挥作用,调节对即将到来的条件刺激的反应。在此,我们用大鼠做了四个操作性学习实验,研究了它是否能类似地调节判别刺激(SD)引起的操作性反应。在实验1中,一个组在10-s SD前进行4 min ITI时反应增强,而在1 min ITI前不进行反应(4+/1-辨别)。第二组的差别正好相反,1+/4-。在巴甫洛夫条件反射中,大鼠在4+/1-条件下可以获得判别控制,而在1+/4-条件下则不能。另外的实验还研究了4+/1-歧视中的时间情境控制是否会在物理情境(即操作室提供的情境)中转移。在实验2中,大鼠在一个情境(情境A)中习得了4+/1-辨别,而在另一个情境(情境B)中辨别无法转移。在实验3中,当强化物的经验在不同情境中相等时,4+/1-歧视也未能转移到情境B。然而,实验4发现,当大鼠在情境b中学习第二种非时间歧视时,转移的证据。总的来说,研究结果表明,ITI持续时间可以以类似于巴甫洛夫条件反应的方式获得对歧视操作的条件控制。可以说,ITI为刺激计划创造了条件,而刺激计划本身也为回应创造了条件。此外,在某些条件下,由时间产生的控制可以跨物理环境传递。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Intertrial interval as a contextual stimulus in discriminated operant learning.","authors":"Emery W Harlan, Eric A Thrailkill, John T Green, Mark E Bouton","doi":"10.1037/xan0000400","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research on Pavlovian conditioning has shown that the duration of the intertrial interval (ITI) can function like a contextual stimulus, modulating responding to an upcoming conditioned stimulus. Here, four operant learning experiments with rats investigated whether ITIs can similarly modulate operant responding occasioned by a discriminative stimulus (SD). In Experiment 1, responding for one group was reinforced during a 10-s SD when it was preceded by a 4-min ITI but not when it was preceded by a 1-min ITI (4+/1- discrimination). A second group had the opposite discrimination, 1+/4-. As seen with Pavlovian conditioning, rats could acquire discriminative control with the 4+/1- but not with the 1+/4- discrimination. Additional experiments investigated whether control by a temporal context in the 4+/1- discrimination transfers across physical contexts (i.e., the context provided by the operant chamber). In Experiment 2, rats learned the 4+/1- discrimination in one context (Context A), and the discrimination failed to transfer to a different context (Context B). In Experiment 3, the 4+/1- discrimination also failed to transfer to Context B when experience with reinforcers was equated across contexts. Experiment 4 found evidence of transfer, however, when rats had learned a second, nontemporal discrimination, in Context B. Overall, the findings suggest that ITI duration can acquire conditional control of discriminated operants in a manner similar to Pavlovian conditioned responses. The ITI arguably sets the occasion for a stimulus that itself sets the occasion for responding. Moreover, the control created by time can transfer across physical contexts under some conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"51 3","pages":"147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144561964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sign-tracking behavior, also known as "autoshaping," is defined as the approach and interaction with reward-predictive cues. It is associated with addiction-related phenotypes and compulsive behavior. Several previous studies have demonstrated that when there is uncertainty about reward properties (e.g., probability and magnitude), sign tracking is increased. However, the effect of cue uncertainty on sign-tracking behavior is not known. Here, using a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm, we held the duration of cues constant and manipulated the temporal uncertainty by implementing either fixed or variable intertrial intervals (ITIs) of different durations across groups of mice. Variable ITIs create temporal uncertainty about when the next cue will occur as well as uncertainty about the interval from the last reward until the next one. We found that temporal uncertainty during acquisition significantly enhances sign tracking, which persists during extinction, even when ITI variability was different in the extinction session than in the acquisition session. This suggests that the effects of temporal uncertainty are learned and retained rather than performance based. Our results demonstrate that sign-tracking behavior is not only modified by the characteristic of the reward, but it can also be modified by uncertainty regarding cues. These findings highlight how temporal predictability shapes cue-directed behaviors and has implications for understanding addiction and compulsive disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
符号跟踪行为,也被称为“自动塑造”,被定义为与奖励预测线索的方法和相互作用。它与成瘾相关的表型和强迫行为有关。先前的一些研究表明,当奖励属性(例如,概率和大小)不确定时,手势跟踪会增加。然而,提示不确定性对手势跟踪行为的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用巴甫洛夫条件反射范式,保持线索持续时间不变,并通过在各组小鼠中实施不同持续时间的固定或可变间隔(ITIs)来操纵时间不确定性。变量会产生关于下一个提示何时出现的时间不确定性,以及从上一个奖励到下一个奖励的间隔的不确定性。我们发现,获取过程中的时间不确定性显著增强了符号跟踪,这种跟踪在消失过程中持续存在,即使在消失过程中的ITI变异性与获取过程中的ITI变异性不同。这表明时间不确定性的影响是学习和保留的,而不是基于表现的。我们的研究结果表明,符号跟踪行为不仅会受到奖励特征的影响,还会受到线索不确定性的影响。这些发现强调了时间可预测性如何塑造线索导向行为,并对理解成瘾和强迫性障碍具有启示意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Impact of temporal uncertainty on sign-tracking behavior.","authors":"Rie Kaneko, Eleanor H Simpson, Peter D Balsam","doi":"10.1037/xan0000394","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xan0000394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sign-tracking behavior, also known as \"autoshaping,\" is defined as the approach and interaction with reward-predictive cues. It is associated with addiction-related phenotypes and compulsive behavior. Several previous studies have demonstrated that when there is uncertainty about reward properties (e.g., probability and magnitude), sign tracking is increased. However, the effect of cue uncertainty on sign-tracking behavior is not known. Here, using a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm, we held the duration of cues constant and manipulated the temporal uncertainty by implementing either fixed or variable intertrial intervals (ITIs) of different durations across groups of mice. Variable ITIs create temporal uncertainty about when the next cue will occur as well as uncertainty about the interval from the last reward until the next one. We found that temporal uncertainty during acquisition significantly enhances sign tracking, which persists during extinction, even when ITI variability was different in the extinction session than in the acquisition session. This suggests that the effects of temporal uncertainty are learned and retained rather than performance based. Our results demonstrate that sign-tracking behavior is not only modified by the characteristic of the reward, but it can also be modified by uncertainty regarding cues. These findings highlight how temporal predictability shapes cue-directed behaviors and has implications for understanding addiction and compulsive disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"51 2","pages":"103-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}