Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition最新文献

Previous experiments found that acceptance of saccharin by rats was reduced if they had prior experience of sucrose or some other highly palatable solution. This reduction in saccharin consumption was particularly extended after a switch from sucrose. On the surface, this seems to correspond to a successive negative contrast (SNC) effect. This term was coined by C. F. Flaherty to describe the situation where consumption of a target solution is reduced by prior experience of a more valuable solution, typically a more concentrated version of the target solution. However, SNC effects are normally transient and assessed relative to a nonshifted control. Here, we confirm that the reduction in consumption seen when shifting from sucrose to saccharin is persistent and is seen relative to the traditional unshifted control. In addition, an analysis of licking microstructure showed that the shift from sucrose to saccharin suppressed the hedonic value of saccharin relative to controls, but this effect was less persistent than consumption suppression. Interestingly, a similar dissociation is observed in extinction of conditioned taste aversion (CTA): suppression of consumption produced by CTA is far more persistent than suppression of hedonic value. The comparison of results across procedures suggests that persistent SNC produced by a qualitative downshift from sucrose to saccharin appears different from quantitative downshifts in the concentration of a single solution, and qualitative downshift effects may involve CTA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Reports an error in "Modulating perceptual learning indexed by the face inversion effect: Simulating the application of transcranial direct current stimulation using the MKM model" by Ciro Civile, Rossy McLaren, Charlotte Forrest, Anna Cooke and Ian P. L. McLaren (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 2023[Jul], Vol 49[3], 139-150). The article is being made available open access under the CC-BY license under the Jisc/ APA Read and Publish agreement. The correct copyright is "© 2023 The Author(s)" and the CC-BY license disclaimer is below. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-90030-001). We report here two large studies investigating the effects of an established transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) procedure on perceptual learning as indexed by the face inversion effect. Experiments 1a and 1b (n = 128) examined the harmful generalization from Thatcherized faces to normal faces by directly comparing the size of the inversion effect for normal faces when presented intermixed with Thatcherized faces (Experiment 1a) versus that obtained when normal faces were presented intermixed with checkerboards (Experiment 1b). The results from the sham/control tDCS groups provide the first direct evidence in the literature showing how Thatcherized faces generalize onto normal ones producing a reduced inversion effect compared to when normal faces are presented with stimuli (e.g., checkerboards) that do not generalize significantly to normal faces. In the anodal tDCS groups, this effect was reversed, with a larger inversion effect recorded for normal faces in Experiment 1a versus that found in Experiment 1b. Further analyses within each experiment confirmed that the anodal tDCS procedure can enhance the inversion effect for normal faces in circumstances where harmful generalization would otherwise be produced by the Thatcherized faces (Experiment 1a). We also demonstrated our standard reduction in the inversion effect for normal faces consequent on the application of tDCS when presented intermixed with stimuli that do not generalize onto them. We interpret our results in terms of simulations using the MKM model of perceptual and associative learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Telling that one object or moment is different from another one is fundamental to cognition and intelligent behavior. Most investigations examining same/different (S/D) concepts in animals have relied on testing static visual stimuli. To move beyond this limitation, we investigated how five pigeons learned and performed a motion S/D discrimination. Using a go/no-go task, dynamic motion fields built from dot elements were presented in sequence to display repeating (same) or changing (different) motions. Each trial consisted of 10 motion segments presented in succession using the direction and rate of dot movement in the motion field to exemplify the S/D relations. The pigeons learned this motion S/D discrimination. We further tested their performance by varying the number and persistence of the dots in the motion fields. The results indicated the pigeons likely extracted globally integrated perceptual summaries of the motions for comparison across the segments. Testing differing organizations of the S/D relations across segments indicated that this discrimination could be determined from as few as two segments and involved an updating comparison of at least four or more segments of the sequence during their presentation. Collectively, the experiments establish for the first time that pigeons can use motion features to classify sequential same and different experiences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

In a typical feature-positive discrimination, responding is reinforced (+) during the target stimulus (A) on trials with the feature stimulus (X), but not during target-alone trials (A-). When X and A are presented simultaneously, direct control by X is typically observed; however, when the stimuli are presented serially, X sets the occasion for responding to A. In the current dual-response procedures, one response (e.g., left lever press) was reinforced during feature-target trials (XA+) and a different response (e.g., right lever press) was reinforced during target-alone trials (A+). In Experiment 1, rats received either serial (X → A+) or simultaneous (X:A+) presentations of the feature-target compound along with target-alone trials (A+). Contrary to our predictions, the serial group failed to learn the discrimination and the simultaneous group demonstrated occasion setting. In Experiment 2, the salience of the feature was increased, which resulted in direct control by the feature in both groups. In Experiment 3, an additional serial group was included with a longer interval between the feature (X) and target (A). Despite the reduced temporal proximity of X to reinforcement, direct control was again observed in all groups. The current pattern of results in the simultaneous and serial groups is interpreted in relation to the enhanced salience of A relative to X, due to separate pairings of A-alone with reinforcement in the dual-response procedure. Consistent with previous findings, occasion setting was observed when A was most salient relative to X (Experiment 1, simultaneous group), but direct control was found when the salience of X was increased (Experiments 2-3). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Three experiments with rats explored whether previously extinguished goal-directed and habitual responding recover with the same status using an ABA renewal preparation. In Experiments 1a and 1b, a lever-press response was minimally (four sessions) or extensively (16 sessions) trained in one context (Context A) and extinguished in another context (Context B). Then, outcome devaluation took place in either Context A or Context B in which a food pellet reinforcing the response was paired with lithium chloride (LiCl) for devalued groups and with saline for a control group. Finally, renewal of the extinguished response was tested in both Contexts A and B. We confirmed that both minimally and extensively trained responses renewed as goal-directed action regardless of the context in which devaluation took place. This finding was replicated in Experiment 2 even after more extended acquisition training (32 sessions). However, another group that received outcome devaluation before but not after extinction training showed habitual performance during extinction training as well as in a subsequent renewal test. Experiment 3 replicated these results and confirmed that renewal of goal direction for rats that received extinction training immediately prior to outcome devaluation was not an artifact of consecutive LiCl exposures over a short period of time in Experiments 1 and 2, using a more reliable devaluation protocol. Overall, the present results extend previous findings suggesting that actions and habits renew with the same status by returning to the original context after extinction. The most critical finding is the differential effects of pre- and postextinction devaluation on the expression of habitual behavior; extinction prior to devaluation may convert a habitual performance into a goal-directed action. This novel finding is discussed in relation to recent studies that identified several factors contributing to a transition from habitual to goal-directed control of instrumental behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

In situations in which multiple predictors anticipate the presence or absence of an outcome, cues compete to anticipate the outcome, resulting in a loss of associative strength compared to control conditions without additional cues. Critically, there are multiple factors modulating the magnitude and direction of such competition, although in some scenarios the effect of these factors remains unexplored. We sought to assess whether the relative salience of the elements in a compound of cues modulates the magnitude of the overshadowing effect in human predictive learning. Two separable categories (i.e., colors and symbols) were used in a predictive learning task. In Experiment 1, different groups of participants were granted with different time of exposure to a compound of cues belonging to different categories (color and symbol) to evaluate potential differences in the magnitude of overshadowing. Furthermore, we used posttest questionnaires to assess whether participants used either only one or both categories during training, and assessed if this impacted the magnitude of overshadowing. In general, overshadowing was not modulated by the time of exposition, except in the case of very short time of exposition with prominent learning about the most salient category. In Experiment 2, the relative salience of a category was biased via prior experience either with a biconditional discrimination or attending only the relevant category (either color or symbol). The previously relevant category was less prone to overshadowing, but not the alternative one. Results are discussed in light of attentional and configural theories of associative learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Three experiments explored how training reinforcement schedules and context influence the elimination and recovery of human operant behavior. In Experiment 1, participants learned a discriminated operant response in Context A before the response was eliminated with extinction in Context B. They then received a final test in each context. Groups were trained with a discriminative stimulus that predicted a reinforced response on either every trial (continuous reinforcement [CRF]) or some of the trials (partial reinforcement [PRF]). Extinction was slower following PRF training (a partial reinforcement extinction effect [PREE]) and extinguished responding increased when tested in Context A ("ABA" renewal). Experiment 2 further confirmed the PREE was obtained equally whether extinction occurred in the training context (Context A) or a new context (Context B) which is consistent with trial-based accounts of the PREE. Experiment 3 used the same design as Experiment 1 to evaluate the influence of training reinforcement on response elimination with an omission contingency. Across the omission training phase in Context B, the decrease in responding occurred more slowly in the PRF-trained group in comparison to the CRF-trained group, perhaps the first demonstration of what might be termed a PRF omission effect. Again, ABA renewal was observed in Context A. Training reinforcement schedule therefore had a similar influence on response elimination with extinction and omission. Elimination and recovery of human instrumental behavior, with extinction or omission, are influenced by training reinforcement schedule and context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Intermixed exposure to two similar stimuli, for example, AX and BX, improves subsequent discrimination between them compared to blocked exposure (the intermixed/blocked effect). Salience modulation models, developed mainly from research with nonhuman animals and exposure to widely spaced similar stimuli, explain this effect in terms of increased salience of the unique elements, A and B. Conversely, the results from experiments initially conducted with humans and exposure to close spaced similar stimuli have led to the suggestion that it is the development of well-unitized representations of unique elements that leads to better discrimination, leaving the unique elements with less effective salience. The experiments carried out here aim to replicate the intermixed/blocked effect in rats using an exposure procedure with rapid succession between stimuli and to assess the effective salience of unique elements. In Experiment 1, an aversion to a new flavor, Y, was conditioned and then an external inhibition test with AY was given. In Experiment 2, an aversion to A was conditioned and its extinction was measured on unreinforced trials. In Experiment 3, an aversion to AY was conditioned and the associated aversion to Y was measured. We found after rapid intermixed preexposure a reduction in generalization from the aversive Y element to the compound AY (Experiment 1) as well as a reduction in A's salience (Experiments 2 and 3) compared to the effects of blocked preexposure. The results are discussed in terms of the various mechanisms underlying perceptual learning, which appear to depend on the details of the task. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

We report here two large studies investigating the effects of an established transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) procedure on perceptual learning as indexed by the face inversion effect. Experiments 1a and 1b (n = 128) examined the harmful generalization from Thatcherized faces to normal faces by directly comparing the size of the inversion effect for normal faces when presented intermixed with Thatcherized faces (Experiment 1a) versus that obtained when normal faces were presented intermixed with checkerboards (Experiment 1b). The results from the sham/control tDCS groups provide the first direct evidence in the literature showing how Thatcherized faces generalize onto normal ones producing a reduced inversion effect compared to when normal faces are presented with stimuli (e.g., checkerboards) that do not generalize significantly to normal faces. In the anodal tDCS groups, this effect was reversed, with a larger inversion effect recorded for normal faces in Experiment 1a versus that found in Experiment 1b. Further analyses within each experiment confirmed that the anodal tDCS procedure can enhance the inversion effect for normal faces in circumstances where harmful generalization would otherwise be produced by the Thatcherized faces (Experiment 1a). We also demonstrated our standard reduction in the inversion effect for normal faces consequent on the application of tDCS when presented intermixed with stimuli that do not generalize onto them. We interpret our results in terms of simulations using the MKM model of perceptual and associative learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).