Ilang M Guiroy, John C S Rodman, Eric Kuhn, Randye J Semple
Objective: This study delineated the unmet mental health needs of peripartum mothers with symptoms of depression, ascertained their willingness to engage in psychotherapy via text message, and identified potential determinants of that willingness (e.g., demographics, preferred communication methods) to inform improvement to service delivery. Method: This was a cross-sectional national survey of 897 adults who had given birth in the previous 24 months, had at least one lifetime symptom of depression, had internet access, and could read English. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariable Firth's logistic regression. Results: Peripartum participants with at least one symptom of depression wanted mental health care the most within 2 years of giving birth (64.4%) and had less access to mental health care during pregnancy and postpartum (35.1% and 38.1%, compared with 23.9%). Fifty-three percent of participants were willing to engage in psychotherapy via text message. Determinants of willingness to engage in text message therapy for all periods (pregnancy, postpartum, and not peripartum) included wanting mental health treatment but not having access and previous experience with psychotherapy via text message. During pregnancy and not peripartum, more depressive symptoms were associated with willingness to engage in psychotherapy via text message. Conclusion: The peripartum period is an especially high-risk time for mothers to experience depressive symptoms. In general, most wanted therapy but were unable to access it. Most participants were willing to engage in text message therapy.
{"title":"The Necessity and Acceptability of Text Message Therapy to Peripartum Mothers.","authors":"Ilang M Guiroy, John C S Rodman, Eric Kuhn, Randye J Semple","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study delineated the unmet mental health needs of peripartum mothers with symptoms of depression, ascertained their willingness to engage in psychotherapy via text message, and identified potential determinants of that willingness (e.g., demographics, preferred communication methods) to inform improvement to service delivery. <b>Method:</b> This was a cross-sectional national survey of 897 adults who had given birth in the previous 24 months, had at least one lifetime symptom of depression, had internet access, and could read English. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariable Firth's logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> Peripartum participants with at least one symptom of depression wanted mental health care the most within 2 years of giving birth (64.4%) and had less access to mental health care during pregnancy and postpartum (35.1% and 38.1%, compared with 23.9%). Fifty-three percent of participants were willing to engage in psychotherapy via text message. Determinants of willingness to engage in text message therapy for all periods (pregnancy, postpartum, and not peripartum) included wanting mental health treatment but not having access and previous experience with psychotherapy via text message. During pregnancy and not peripartum, more depressive symptoms were associated with willingness to engage in psychotherapy via text message. <b>Conclusion:</b> The peripartum period is an especially high-risk time for mothers to experience depressive symptoms. In general, most wanted therapy but were unable to access it. Most participants were willing to engage in text message therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mònica Rodríguez-Bagó, José Miguel Martínez-Martínez, Jordi Ortner-Sancho, Xavier Farrús-Esteban, Maite Sampere-Valero, Elena Ronda-Pérez
Objective: Interventions through telerehabilitation have shown positive effects in various clinical conditions, facilitating the return to work of the working population. This study aimed to compare conventional, center-based physiotherapy versus an intervention combining home- and center-based treatment for whiplash syndrome in workers enrolled in a mutual insurance company, evaluating differences in the number of face-to-face sessions and the duration of sickness absence. The secondary aim was to assess the acceptability and usability of the telerehabilitation intervention. Methods: The study population (n = 387) comprised workers aged 16 to 65 years who required physiotherapy due to whiplash (ICD-9 847.0). The main outcome variable was the number of face-to-face sessions. The duration of sickness absence was also calculated. A survey was also conducted to determine patient acceptance and usability of the platform. The analyses were adjusted for sex, age, occupation, and the center where the physiotherapy treatment was administered. Results: The number of face-to-face physiotherapy sessions dropped significantly, from 9 to 7, due to the implementation of telerehabilitation. This decrease was not associated with a longer duration of sickness absence. The difference in the median duration of sickness absence between patients who had not undergone telerehabilitation and those who had undergone telerehabilitation was -1 [95% CI= (-6 to 2)]. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation reduces the number of face-to-face physiotherapy sessions needed, which can reduce the care burden in physiotherapy centers and avoid the need for patients to travel (with a corresponding reduction in transportation costs), without increasing the duration of sickness absence.
{"title":"Combined Treatment of Face-to-Face Physical Therapy and Telerehabilitation in Workers with Whiplash Syndrome.","authors":"Mònica Rodríguez-Bagó, José Miguel Martínez-Martínez, Jordi Ortner-Sancho, Xavier Farrús-Esteban, Maite Sampere-Valero, Elena Ronda-Pérez","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Interventions through telerehabilitation have shown positive effects in various clinical conditions, facilitating the return to work of the working population. This study aimed to compare conventional, center-based physiotherapy versus an intervention combining home- and center-based treatment for whiplash syndrome in workers enrolled in a mutual insurance company, evaluating differences in the number of face-to-face sessions and the duration of sickness absence. The secondary aim was to assess the acceptability and usability of the telerehabilitation intervention. <b>Methods:</b> The study population (<i>n</i> = 387) comprised workers aged 16 to 65 years who required physiotherapy due to whiplash (ICD-9 847.0). The main outcome variable was the number of face-to-face sessions. The duration of sickness absence was also calculated. A survey was also conducted to determine patient acceptance and usability of the platform. The analyses were adjusted for sex, age, occupation, and the center where the physiotherapy treatment was administered. <b>Results:</b> The number of face-to-face physiotherapy sessions dropped significantly, from 9 to 7, due to the implementation of telerehabilitation. This decrease was not associated with a longer duration of sickness absence. The difference in the median duration of sickness absence between patients who had not undergone telerehabilitation and those who had undergone telerehabilitation was -1 [95% CI= (-6 to 2)]. <b>Conclusion:</b> Telerehabilitation reduces the number of face-to-face physiotherapy sessions needed, which can reduce the care burden in physiotherapy centers and avoid the need for patients to travel (with a corresponding reduction in transportation costs), without increasing the duration of sickness absence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Priscila Oliveira Machado Cecagno, Natália Donati Polesello, Tatiana Duque-Cartagena, Pedro Machado Luz, Eduardo Mundstock, Marcello Dala Bernardina Dalla, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Rita Mattiello
Background: Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. Methods: Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. Results: Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; I2: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; I2: 0%]) symptoms. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.
{"title":"Efficacy of Remote Psychological Interventions for Patients with Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Priscila Oliveira Machado Cecagno, Natália Donati Polesello, Tatiana Duque-Cartagena, Pedro Machado Luz, Eduardo Mundstock, Marcello Dala Bernardina Dalla, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Rita Mattiello","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. <b>Methods:</b> Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. <b>Results:</b> Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 0%]) symptoms. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan Mia Foo, Zaine Roberts, Rosemary Claire Roden
Purpose: This is a retrospective chart review examining factors, which may contribute to timing of receipt of prescription for testosterone or estrogen-based interventions for transgender adolescents and young adults who do not receive such a prescription at their first medical appointment. Methods: A total of 176 patient records were available; of this a minority received a prescription for hormone therapy at first medical appointment. Of the remaining 108 unique individuals, 49 received a prescription at a subsequent medical. Results: Participants seen through virtual health care had a significantly longer time in care prior to receipt of estrogen or testosterone prescription (331 days vs. 220 days, p = 0.046). No other significant relationships were found. Conclusion: Patients who utilize telemedicine services for gender-related health care purposes and who did not receive a prescription for estrogen or testosterone at their initial medical encounter have a longer lead time to receipt of hormone therapy.
{"title":"Use of Telemedicine Services Is Associated with Longer Time to Initiation of Hormone Therapy in Transgender Teens and Young Adults.","authors":"Megan Mia Foo, Zaine Roberts, Rosemary Claire Roden","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This is a retrospective chart review examining factors, which may contribute to timing of receipt of prescription for testosterone or estrogen-based interventions for transgender adolescents and young adults who do not receive such a prescription at their first medical appointment. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 176 patient records were available; of this a minority received a prescription for hormone therapy at first medical appointment. Of the remaining 108 unique individuals, 49 received a prescription at a subsequent medical. <b>Results:</b> Participants seen through virtual health care had a significantly longer time in care prior to receipt of estrogen or testosterone prescription (331 days vs. 220 days, <i>p</i> = 0.046). No other significant relationships were found. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients who utilize telemedicine services for gender-related health care purposes and who did not receive a prescription for estrogen or testosterone at their initial medical encounter have a longer lead time to receipt of hormone therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicole Hicks,Jingjing Zhan,Janette Brual,Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde,Myrtede Alfred
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals in North America were overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients and had limited capacity to admit patients. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs were developed to monitor COVID-19 patients at home and reduce disease transmission and the demand on hospitals. A critical component of RPM programs is effective escalation pathways. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the implementation of escalation pathways of RPM programs for COVID-19 patients in Canada and the United States. Methods: The search identified 563 articles from Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. Following title and abstract screening, 131 were selected for full-text review, and 26 articles were included. Data were extracted on study location, patient eligibility and program size, data collection, monitoring team, escalation criteria, and escalation response. Results: The included studies were published between 2020 and 2022; 3 in Canada and 23 in the United States. The RPM programs collected physiological vital signs and symptom data, which were inputted manually by patients and health care workers or synced automatically. Escalations were triggered automatically or following manual review by nurses and physicians when signs and symptoms were concerning or reached a specific threshold. Escalations included emergency department referrals, physician appointments, and increased monitoring. Conclusion: Many decisions are required when designing RPM escalation pathways for patients with COVID-19, which is crucial to promptly address patients' changing health statuses and clinical needs. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of escalation pathways for COVID-19 patients through performance metrics and patient and health care worker experience.
{"title":"Escalation Pathways of Remote Patient Monitoring Programs for COVID-19 Patients in Canada and the United States: A Rapid Review.","authors":"Nicole Hicks,Jingjing Zhan,Janette Brual,Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde,Myrtede Alfred","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0280","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals in North America were overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients and had limited capacity to admit patients. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs were developed to monitor COVID-19 patients at home and reduce disease transmission and the demand on hospitals. A critical component of RPM programs is effective escalation pathways. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the implementation of escalation pathways of RPM programs for COVID-19 patients in Canada and the United States. Methods: The search identified 563 articles from Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. Following title and abstract screening, 131 were selected for full-text review, and 26 articles were included. Data were extracted on study location, patient eligibility and program size, data collection, monitoring team, escalation criteria, and escalation response. Results: The included studies were published between 2020 and 2022; 3 in Canada and 23 in the United States. The RPM programs collected physiological vital signs and symptom data, which were inputted manually by patients and health care workers or synced automatically. Escalations were triggered automatically or following manual review by nurses and physicians when signs and symptoms were concerning or reached a specific threshold. Escalations included emergency department referrals, physician appointments, and increased monitoring. Conclusion: Many decisions are required when designing RPM escalation pathways for patients with COVID-19, which is crucial to promptly address patients' changing health statuses and clinical needs. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of escalation pathways for COVID-19 patients through performance metrics and patient and health care worker experience.","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taona P Haderlein,Steven B Zeliadt,Alexander T Kloehn,Briana D Lott,Joy Toyama,Adam Resnick,A Rani Elwy,Claudia Der-Martirosian,Stephanie L Taylor
Background: Virtual complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapy availability increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about effectiveness. We examined the perceived effectiveness of in-person and virtual CIH therapies for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who recently started using CIH therapies. Methods: The sample included Veterans (n = 1,091) with chronic musculoskeletal pain, identified in the Veterans Health Administration's electronic health record based on initiation of CIH therapy use, who responded to VA's Patient Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Experience Survey during March, 2021, to August, 2022. Using multivariable models with self-guided virtual (apps or videos) delivery as the reference, we compared patient-reported outcomes (pain, mental health, fatigue, and general well-being) associated with any yoga, Tai Chi/Qigong, or meditation use delivered: (1) only in-person, (2) only virtually with a live provider, (3) only virtually self-guided, (4) virtually self-guided + virtually provider-guided, or (5) hybrid in-person + virtual (self-or provider-guided). Results: Under 10% of Veterans reported only in-person use; 54% used only virtual formats and 36% a hybrid of in-person and virtual. Forty-one percent reported improvement in general well-being, 40.6% in mental health, 37.1% in pain, and 22.7% in fatigue. Compared with Veterans using only self-guided virtual CIH therapies, Veterans using only in-person therapies were more likely to report improvement in fatigue (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.1) and general well-being (OR: 1.7, CI: 1.0-2.6). Conclusions: Many patients perceived health improvements from CIH therapies, with in-person users reporting more improvement in fatigue and well-being than those using virtual sessions and similar improvements in pain and mental health for in-person and hybrid users.
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,虚拟补充和综合保健(CIH)疗法的可用性有所增加,但人们对其有效性知之甚少。我们研究了最近开始使用 CIH 疗法的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者对现场和虚拟 CIH 疗法有效性的感知。研究方法样本包括退伍军人(n = 1,091),他们患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛,根据开始使用 CIH 疗法的时间在退伍军人健康管理局的电子健康记录中进行了确认,并在 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 8 月期间对退伍军人健康管理局的患者补充和综合健康疗法体验调查做出了回应。我们使用多变量模型,以自我指导的虚拟(应用程序或视频)交付作为参考,比较了与任何瑜伽、太极/气功或冥想使用相关的患者报告结果(疼痛、心理健康、疲劳和总体幸福感):(1) 仅面对面,(2) 仅与现场提供者虚拟,(3) 仅虚拟自我指导,(4) 虚拟自我指导 + 虚拟提供者指导,或 (5) 混合面对面 + 虚拟(自我或提供者指导)。结果:不到 10%的退伍军人表示只使用了面对面指导;54%的退伍军人只使用了虚拟指导,36%的退伍军人混合使用了面对面指导和虚拟指导。41%的退伍军人表示总体健康状况有所改善,40.6%的退伍军人表示心理健康有所改善,37.1%的退伍军人表示疼痛有所改善,22.7%的退伍军人表示疲劳有所改善。与只使用自我指导的虚拟 CIH 疗法的退伍军人相比,只使用面对面疗法的退伍军人更有可能报告疲劳(几率比 [OR]:1.8,置信区间 [CI]:1.1-3.1)和总体健康(几率比:1.7,置信区间:1.0-2.6)有所改善。结论许多患者认为CIH疗法改善了他们的健康状况,与使用虚拟疗程的患者相比,亲临现场的患者在疲劳和健康方面的改善程度更大,而亲临现场和混合使用的患者在疼痛和心理健康方面的改善程度相似。
{"title":"Are Virtual Complementary and Integrative Therapies as Effective as In-Person Therapies? Examining Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.","authors":"Taona P Haderlein,Steven B Zeliadt,Alexander T Kloehn,Briana D Lott,Joy Toyama,Adam Resnick,A Rani Elwy,Claudia Der-Martirosian,Stephanie L Taylor","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0060","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Virtual complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapy availability increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about effectiveness. We examined the perceived effectiveness of in-person and virtual CIH therapies for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who recently started using CIH therapies. Methods: The sample included Veterans (n = 1,091) with chronic musculoskeletal pain, identified in the Veterans Health Administration's electronic health record based on initiation of CIH therapy use, who responded to VA's Patient Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Experience Survey during March, 2021, to August, 2022. Using multivariable models with self-guided virtual (apps or videos) delivery as the reference, we compared patient-reported outcomes (pain, mental health, fatigue, and general well-being) associated with any yoga, Tai Chi/Qigong, or meditation use delivered: (1) only in-person, (2) only virtually with a live provider, (3) only virtually self-guided, (4) virtually self-guided + virtually provider-guided, or (5) hybrid in-person + virtual (self-or provider-guided). Results: Under 10% of Veterans reported only in-person use; 54% used only virtual formats and 36% a hybrid of in-person and virtual. Forty-one percent reported improvement in general well-being, 40.6% in mental health, 37.1% in pain, and 22.7% in fatigue. Compared with Veterans using only self-guided virtual CIH therapies, Veterans using only in-person therapies were more likely to report improvement in fatigue (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.1) and general well-being (OR: 1.7, CI: 1.0-2.6). Conclusions: Many patients perceived health improvements from CIH therapies, with in-person users reporting more improvement in fatigue and well-being than those using virtual sessions and similar improvements in pain and mental health for in-person and hybrid users.","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: In Japan, telemedicine has gradually expanded due to deregulation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its current status remains unclear, as it is primarily provided by general practitioners. This study aims to examine the use of telemedicine in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for patients with Japanese cedar pollen allergy and/or house dust mite allergic rhinitis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical record data from seven otorhinolaryngology clinics and performed an exploratory evaluation between a group that combined telemedicine and in-person visits during the initial 6 months of SLIT and another group with only in-person visits. Results: Following propensity score matching, 51 and 82 patients were eligible for the telemedicine and in-person groups, respectively, with 33 cases in both groups. Both groups had similar characteristics after matching. No significant difference was found in the withdrawal rate at 6 months from the start of SLIT (6.1% and 9.1% in each group; p = 1.00), side effects, or treatment efficacy between the two groups. The average copayment for patients tended to be significantly higher in the telemedicine group after one, three, and 6 months following SLIT initiation. Discussion: The situation of patients who receive an appropriate combination of telemedicine and in-person visits is not significantly different from patients who receive in-person visits alone. This study may help indicate the actual status of telemedicine in Japan. Further investigation at more facilities is necessary in the future to dispel concerns in the practice setting.
{"title":"Retrospective Observational Study on Telemedicine in Sublingual Immunotherapy for Patients with Japanese Cedar Pollinosis and House Dust Mite Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Yumi Inoo,Hiroshi Iida,Hiroto Nakada,Katsuhiko Tezuka,Yasutake Kikuchi,Eiichi Fujimura,Tasuku Nishikawa,Kazuhiro Yamamoto,Yutaro Ida,Yusuke Saigusa,Takashi Hatano,Masahiko Inamori","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0065","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In Japan, telemedicine has gradually expanded due to deregulation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its current status remains unclear, as it is primarily provided by general practitioners. This study aims to examine the use of telemedicine in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for patients with Japanese cedar pollen allergy and/or house dust mite allergic rhinitis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical record data from seven otorhinolaryngology clinics and performed an exploratory evaluation between a group that combined telemedicine and in-person visits during the initial 6 months of SLIT and another group with only in-person visits. Results: Following propensity score matching, 51 and 82 patients were eligible for the telemedicine and in-person groups, respectively, with 33 cases in both groups. Both groups had similar characteristics after matching. No significant difference was found in the withdrawal rate at 6 months from the start of SLIT (6.1% and 9.1% in each group; p = 1.00), side effects, or treatment efficacy between the two groups. The average copayment for patients tended to be significantly higher in the telemedicine group after one, three, and 6 months following SLIT initiation. Discussion: The situation of patients who receive an appropriate combination of telemedicine and in-person visits is not significantly different from patients who receive in-person visits alone. This study may help indicate the actual status of telemedicine in Japan. Further investigation at more facilities is necessary in the future to dispel concerns in the practice setting.","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142208838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Frankowska, Marcin Piotr Walkowiak, Dariusz Walkowiak
Objective: As digital natives appear to be the most suitable target group for technological innovations, we tested this notion by analyzing their attitude toward the implementation of telemedicine in Poland. Methods: An online survey was conducted from April to October 2021, yielding responses from 475 university students on their experience with teleconsultations, which are an essential part of telemedicine. Satisfaction-related questions were used to perform cluster analysis, and subsequently, clusters were compared based on significant differences in responses including sociodemographic and utilization patterns. Open-ended questions were analyzed to further gauge the rationale behind the demonstrated attitude. Results: The responses were polarized. In the cluster analysis, on one side were the "Skeptics" and "Enemies," who shared negative opinions on professionalism and convenience, differing only in their assessment of intangible skills. On the other side were the "Enthusiasts," who were satisfied in all categories; the "Indifferent," who lacked strong opinions; and the "Time-pressed," who, while openly admitting its drawbacks, were highly likely to continue using it due to its time-saving potential. Recurring concerns in open-ended questions focused on unreliable diagnoses and uncooperative administrative personnel. Conclusions: The reception was polarized. The split in answers suggests that administrative problems were limited to some providers, indicating they should be possible to overcome. There is a clear pattern that telemedicine is seen as an incomplete service. However, many would happily continue to use it due to its convenience and time-saving benefits.
{"title":"Telemedicine's Hesitant Reception Among Digital Natives: A Cluster Analysis of Polish Students' Attitudes.","authors":"Anna Frankowska, Marcin Piotr Walkowiak, Dariusz Walkowiak","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0296","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> As digital natives appear to be the most suitable target group for technological innovations, we tested this notion by analyzing their attitude toward the implementation of telemedicine in Poland. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was conducted from April to October 2021, yielding responses from 475 university students on their experience with teleconsultations, which are an essential part of telemedicine. Satisfaction-related questions were used to perform cluster analysis, and subsequently, clusters were compared based on significant differences in responses including sociodemographic and utilization patterns. Open-ended questions were analyzed to further gauge the rationale behind the demonstrated attitude. <b>Results:</b> The responses were polarized. In the cluster analysis, on one side were the \"Skeptics\" and \"Enemies,\" who shared negative opinions on professionalism and convenience, differing only in their assessment of intangible skills. On the other side were the \"Enthusiasts,\" who were satisfied in all categories; the \"Indifferent,\" who lacked strong opinions; and the \"Time-pressed,\" who, while openly admitting its drawbacks, were highly likely to continue using it due to its time-saving potential. Recurring concerns in open-ended questions focused on unreliable diagnoses and uncooperative administrative personnel. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reception was polarized. The split in answers suggests that administrative problems were limited to some providers, indicating they should be possible to overcome. There is a clear pattern that telemedicine is seen as an incomplete service. However, many would happily continue to use it due to its convenience and time-saving benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samantha L Connolly, Yamini Adusumelli, Robert P Azario, Sierra D Ferris, Andrew R Hwang, Christopher J Miller
Background: Audio-only (phone) telemental health care can increase access to care, but its lack of nonverbal information may negatively impact care quality as compared to video or in-person visits. The objective of this work was to understand patient and provider attitudes toward phone care via a review of qualitative research. Methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted of peer-reviewed qualitative research published between 2013 and 2023. Studies were required to include qualitative data regarding patient and/or provider attitudes toward audio-only telemental health care. Results pertinent to phone care were extracted and underwent coding followed by theme identification. Results: We identified 2,065 abstracts and 29 articles were ultimately included in the synthesis; 27 of these studies were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five themes described benefits of phone care, nine described drawbacks, and three themes were neutral. Phone care was seen as easy to use, particularly for briefer check-ins or as a back-up option if video calls failed, and some patients preferred the privacy of not being seen. However, the loss of visual information during phone visits was considered particularly challenging in the treatment of more complex or severe patients; providers questioned whether they were able to provide high quality care, and patients reported feeling less supported and understood by their providers. Conclusions: The relative benefits and drawbacks of audio-only telemental health care must be carefully weighed against the options of video or in-person treatment based on patient needs and severity. Future work should continue to examine patient and provider attitudes toward phone care as the mental health landscape evolves postpandemic.
{"title":"A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Patient and Provider Attitudes Toward Audio-Only Telemental Health Care.","authors":"Samantha L Connolly, Yamini Adusumelli, Robert P Azario, Sierra D Ferris, Andrew R Hwang, Christopher J Miller","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Audio-only (phone) telemental health care can increase access to care, but its lack of nonverbal information may negatively impact care quality as compared to video or in-person visits. The objective of this work was to understand patient and provider attitudes toward phone care via a review of qualitative research. <b>Methods:</b> A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted of peer-reviewed qualitative research published between 2013 and 2023. Studies were required to include qualitative data regarding patient and/or provider attitudes toward audio-only telemental health care. Results pertinent to phone care were extracted and underwent coding followed by theme identification. <b>Results:</b> We identified 2,065 abstracts and 29 articles were ultimately included in the synthesis; 27 of these studies were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five themes described benefits of phone care, nine described drawbacks, and three themes were neutral. Phone care was seen as easy to use, particularly for briefer check-ins or as a back-up option if video calls failed, and some patients preferred the privacy of not being seen. However, the loss of visual information during phone visits was considered particularly challenging in the treatment of more complex or severe patients; providers questioned whether they were able to provide high quality care, and patients reported feeling less supported and understood by their providers. <b>Conclusions:</b> The relative benefits and drawbacks of audio-only telemental health care must be carefully weighed against the options of video or in-person treatment based on patient needs and severity. Future work should continue to examine patient and provider attitudes toward phone care as the mental health landscape evolves postpandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christoph Hillen, Charlotte Sachs, Kai J Buhling, Monserat Eschenburg, Sebastian Griewing, Juliana Veneroso, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Johannes von Büren
Background: The acceptance of telemedicine in the German health care system is growing. This also extends to gynecological applications such as the prescription of contraceptives. This study investigates the contraceptive use and adherence of patients using a direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription platform for oral contraception. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using anonymized data obtained from a DTC prescription platform between May 2021 and March 2023. The patient-reported outcome was evaluated after 3 months through a follow-up questionnaire. Results: In total, 8,065 patient records were available and 1,008 patients responded to the follow-up questionnaire. Patients were mostly taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and only 6% were taking a progestin-only pill (POP). Even in patient populations at higher risk, such as smokers and obese women, the proportion of POP users was less than 20%. Over 90% of users reported that they took the pill without any intake errors, with the main intake error being forgotten intake. Overall, 23% of patients reported adverse events while taking the pill, with POP users reporting more adverse events than COC users (36.7% vs. 22.2%). Over 70% of patients regularly attended cervical screening. Conclusions: Users of a DTC prescribing platform exhibit strong adherence, with over 90% successfully taking oral contraceptive pills. The platform effectively identifies absolute contraindications but could enhance recommendations for contraceptives in the presence of relative contraindications. For healthy women familiar with pill usage, DTC platforms offer a viable and convenient alternative to traditional doctor's office prescriptions.
{"title":"Evaluating Patient-Reported Adherence And Safety for Oral Contraception Treatment in Women via a Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Platform: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Christoph Hillen, Charlotte Sachs, Kai J Buhling, Monserat Eschenburg, Sebastian Griewing, Juliana Veneroso, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Johannes von Büren","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The acceptance of telemedicine in the German health care system is growing. This also extends to gynecological applications such as the prescription of contraceptives. This study investigates the contraceptive use and adherence of patients using a direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription platform for oral contraception. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using anonymized data obtained from a DTC prescription platform between May 2021 and March 2023. The patient-reported outcome was evaluated after 3 months through a follow-up questionnaire. <b>Results:</b> In total, 8,065 patient records were available and 1,008 patients responded to the follow-up questionnaire. Patients were mostly taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and only 6% were taking a progestin-only pill (POP). Even in patient populations at higher risk, such as smokers and obese women, the proportion of POP users was less than 20%. Over 90% of users reported that they took the pill without any intake errors, with the main intake error being forgotten intake. Overall, 23% of patients reported adverse events while taking the pill, with POP users reporting more adverse events than COC users (36.7% vs. 22.2%). Over 70% of patients regularly attended cervical screening. <b>Conclusions:</b> Users of a DTC prescribing platform exhibit strong adherence, with over 90% successfully taking oral contraceptive pills. The platform effectively identifies absolute contraindications but could enhance recommendations for contraceptives in the presence of relative contraindications. For healthy women familiar with pill usage, DTC platforms offer a viable and convenient alternative to traditional doctor's office prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}