首页 > 最新文献

Health Services Research最新文献

英文 中文
Eliciting patient past experiences of healthcare discrimination as a potential pathway to reduce health disparities: A qualitative study of primary care staff. 了解病人过去遭受医疗歧视的经历是减少健康差异的潜在途径:一项针对初级保健人员的定性研究。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14373
Dharma E Cortés, Ana M Progovac, Frederick Lu, Esther Lee, Nathaniel M Tran, Margo A Moyer, Varshini Odayar, Caryn R R Rodgers, Leslie Adams, Valeria Chambers, Jonathan Delman, Deborah Delman, Selma de Castro, María José Sánchez Román, Natasha A Kaushal, Timothy B Creedon, Rajan A Sonik, Catherine Rodriguez Quinerly, Ora Nakash, Afsaneh Moradi, Heba Abolaban, Tali Flomenhoft, Ruth Nabisere, Ziva Mann, Sherry Shu-Yeu Hou, Farah N Shaikh, Michael W Flores, Dierdre Jordan, Nicholas Carson, Adam C Carle, Benjamin Lé Cook, Danny McCormick

Objective: To understand whether and how primary care providers and staff elicit patients' past experiences of healthcare discrimination when providing care.

Data sources/study setting: Twenty qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare staff in primary care roles to inform future interventions to integrate data about past experiences of healthcare discrimination into clinical care.

Study design: Qualitative study.

Data collection/extraction methods: Data were collected via semi-structured qualitative interviews between December 2018 and January 2019, with health care staff in primary care roles at a hospital-based clinic within an urban safety-net health system that serves a patient population with significant racial, ethnic, and linguistic diversity.

Principal findings: Providers did not routinely, or in a structured way, elicit information about past experiences of healthcare discrimination. Some providers believed that information about healthcare discrimination experiences could allow them to be more aware of and responsive to their patients' needs and to establish more trusting relationships. Others did not deem it appropriate or useful to elicit such information and were concerned about challenges in collecting and effectively using such data.

Conclusions: While providers see value in eliciting past experiences of discrimination, directly and systematically discussing such experiences with patients during a primary care encounter is challenging for them. Collecting this information in primary care settings will likely require implementation of multilevel systematic data collection strategies. Findings presented here can help identify clinic-level opportunities to do so.

目的了解初级医疗服务提供者和医务人员在提供医疗服务时是否以及如何获取患者过去遭受医疗歧视的经历:对担任初级保健角色的医护人员进行了 20 次半结构式定性访谈,以便为未来将有关过去医疗歧视经历的数据纳入临床护理的干预措施提供信息:数据收集/提取方法:数据收集/提取方法:2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,通过半结构化定性访谈收集数据,访谈对象为城市安全网医疗系统内一家医院诊所的初级保健人员,该诊所服务的患者群体具有显著的种族、民族和语言多样性:医疗服务提供者没有定期或有组织地收集有关过去医疗歧视经历的信息。一些医疗服务提供者认为,有关医疗歧视经历的信息可以让他们更加了解和满足患者的需求,并建立更加信任的关系。另一些医疗服务提供者则认为获取此类信息并不合适或无用,并担心在收集和有效使用此类数据时会遇到困难:尽管医疗服务提供者认为获取患者过去遭受歧视的经历很有价值,但在初级医疗就诊过程中直接、系统地与患者讨论这些经历对他们来说具有挑战性。在初级医疗机构中收集此类信息可能需要实施多层次的系统数据收集策略。本文介绍的研究结果有助于确定诊所层面的相关机会。
{"title":"Eliciting patient past experiences of healthcare discrimination as a potential pathway to reduce health disparities: A qualitative study of primary care staff.","authors":"Dharma E Cortés, Ana M Progovac, Frederick Lu, Esther Lee, Nathaniel M Tran, Margo A Moyer, Varshini Odayar, Caryn R R Rodgers, Leslie Adams, Valeria Chambers, Jonathan Delman, Deborah Delman, Selma de Castro, María José Sánchez Román, Natasha A Kaushal, Timothy B Creedon, Rajan A Sonik, Catherine Rodriguez Quinerly, Ora Nakash, Afsaneh Moradi, Heba Abolaban, Tali Flomenhoft, Ruth Nabisere, Ziva Mann, Sherry Shu-Yeu Hou, Farah N Shaikh, Michael W Flores, Dierdre Jordan, Nicholas Carson, Adam C Carle, Benjamin Lé Cook, Danny McCormick","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand whether and how primary care providers and staff elicit patients' past experiences of healthcare discrimination when providing care.</p><p><strong>Data sources/study setting: </strong>Twenty qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare staff in primary care roles to inform future interventions to integrate data about past experiences of healthcare discrimination into clinical care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>Data were collected via semi-structured qualitative interviews between December 2018 and January 2019, with health care staff in primary care roles at a hospital-based clinic within an urban safety-net health system that serves a patient population with significant racial, ethnic, and linguistic diversity.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Providers did not routinely, or in a structured way, elicit information about past experiences of healthcare discrimination. Some providers believed that information about healthcare discrimination experiences could allow them to be more aware of and responsive to their patients' needs and to establish more trusting relationships. Others did not deem it appropriate or useful to elicit such information and were concerned about challenges in collecting and effectively using such data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While providers see value in eliciting past experiences of discrimination, directly and systematically discussing such experiences with patients during a primary care encounter is challenging for them. Collecting this information in primary care settings will likely require implementation of multilevel systematic data collection strategies. Findings presented here can help identify clinic-level opportunities to do so.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary care mental health integration to improve early treatment engagement for veterans who screen positive for depression 整合基层医疗机构的心理健康服务,提高抑郁症筛查呈阳性的退伍军人的早期治疗参与度。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14354
Lucinda B. Leung MD, PhD, MPH, Karen Chu MS, Danielle E. Rose PhD, Susan E. Stockdale PhD, Edward P. Post MD, PhD, Jennifer S. Funderburk PhD, Lisa V. Rubenstein MD, MSPH
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To examine the relationship between the penetration (or reach) of a national program aiming to integrate mental health clinicians into all primary care clinics (PC-MHI) and rates of guideline-concordant follow-up and treatment among clinic patients newly identified with depression in the Veterans Health Administration (VA).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Sources/Study Setting</h3> <p>15,155 screen-positive patients 607,730 patients with 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores in 82 primary care clinics, 2015–2019.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Study Design</h3> <p>In this retrospective cohort study, we used established depression care quality measures to assess primary care patients who (a) newly screened positive (score ≥3) and (b) were identified with depression by clinicians via diagnosis and/or medication (<i>n</i> = 15,155; 15,650 patient-years). Timely follow-up included ≥3 mental health, ≥3 psychotherapy, or ≥3 primary care visits for depression. Minimally appropriate treatment included ≥4 mental health visits, ≥3 psychotherapy, or ≥60 days of medication. In multivariate regressions, we examined whether higher rates of PC-MHI penetration in clinic (proportion of total primary care patients in a clinic who saw any PC-MHI clinician) were associated with greater depression care quality among cohort patients, adjusting for year, healthcare system, and patient and clinic characteristics.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3> <p>Electronic health record data from 82 VA clinics across three states.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Principal Findings</h3> <p>A median of 9% of all primary care patients were seen by any PC-MHI clinician annually. In fully adjusted models, greater PC-MHI penetration was associated with timely depression follow-up within 84 days (∆<i>P</i> = 0.5; SE = 0.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 180 days (∆<i>P</i> = 0.3; SE = 0.1; <i>p</i> = 0.01) of a positive depression screen. Completion of at least minimal treatment within 12 months was high (77%), on average, and not associated with PC-MHI penetration.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>Greater PC-MHI program penetration was associated with early depression treatment engagement at 84−/180-days among clinic patients newly identified with depression, with no effect on already high rates of co
目的研究旨在将心理健康临床医生纳入所有初级保健诊所(PC-MHI)的国家计划的渗透率(或覆盖率)与退伍军人健康管理局(VA)新发现的抑郁症患者的指南一致性随访和治疗率之间的关系:2015-2019年,82家初级保健诊所的15155名筛查阳性患者607730名患者的2项患者健康问卷得分:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用已建立的抑郁症护理质量测量方法来评估(a)新筛查阳性(得分≥3)和(b)临床医生通过诊断和/或药物治疗确定为抑郁症的初级保健患者(n = 15,155; 15,650 患者年)。及时随访包括≥3 次心理健康随访、≥3 次心理治疗随访或≥3 次抑郁症初级保健随访。最低限度的适当治疗包括≥4次精神健康检查、≥3次心理治疗或≥60天的药物治疗。在多变量回归中,我们考察了诊所中PC-MHI渗透率越高(诊所中看过任何PC-MHI临床医生的全科患者比例)是否与队列患者中抑郁症护理质量越高有关,并对年份、医疗保健系统、患者和诊所特征进行了调整:数据收集/提取方法:来自三个州 82 家退伍军人诊所的电子健康记录数据:在所有初级保健患者中,每年接受 PC-MHI 诊疗的患者中位数为 9%。在完全调整模型中,PC-MHI 普及率越高,84 天内抑郁症的及时随访率就越高(∆P = 0.5; SE = 0.1; p 结论:PC-MHI 计划普及率越高,抑郁症的随访率就越高(∆P = 0.5; SE = 0.1; pPC-MHI项目的普及率越高,新发现的抑郁症门诊患者在84天/180天内尽早接受抑郁症治疗的可能性就越大,而对一年内完成最低限度治疗的高比率则没有影响。
{"title":"Primary care mental health integration to improve early treatment engagement for veterans who screen positive for depression","authors":"Lucinda B. Leung MD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Karen Chu MS,&nbsp;Danielle E. Rose PhD,&nbsp;Susan E. Stockdale PhD,&nbsp;Edward P. Post MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Funderburk PhD,&nbsp;Lisa V. Rubenstein MD, MSPH","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14354","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14354","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To examine the relationship between the penetration (or reach) of a national program aiming to integrate mental health clinicians into all primary care clinics (PC-MHI) and rates of guideline-concordant follow-up and treatment among clinic patients newly identified with depression in the Veterans Health Administration (VA).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Sources/Study Setting&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;15,155 screen-positive patients 607,730 patients with 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores in 82 primary care clinics, 2015–2019.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;In this retrospective cohort study, we used established depression care quality measures to assess primary care patients who (a) newly screened positive (score ≥3) and (b) were identified with depression by clinicians via diagnosis and/or medication (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 15,155; 15,650 patient-years). Timely follow-up included ≥3 mental health, ≥3 psychotherapy, or ≥3 primary care visits for depression. Minimally appropriate treatment included ≥4 mental health visits, ≥3 psychotherapy, or ≥60 days of medication. In multivariate regressions, we examined whether higher rates of PC-MHI penetration in clinic (proportion of total primary care patients in a clinic who saw any PC-MHI clinician) were associated with greater depression care quality among cohort patients, adjusting for year, healthcare system, and patient and clinic characteristics.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Collection/Extraction Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Electronic health record data from 82 VA clinics across three states.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Principal Findings&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A median of 9% of all primary care patients were seen by any PC-MHI clinician annually. In fully adjusted models, greater PC-MHI penetration was associated with timely depression follow-up within 84 days (∆&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.5; SE = 0.1; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) and 180 days (∆&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.3; SE = 0.1; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01) of a positive depression screen. Completion of at least minimal treatment within 12 months was high (77%), on average, and not associated with PC-MHI penetration.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Greater PC-MHI program penetration was associated with early depression treatment engagement at 84−/180-days among clinic patients newly identified with depression, with no effect on already high rates of co","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolution of the Veterans Health Administration Learning Health System: 25 years of QUERI 退伍军人健康管理局学习健康系统的演变:QUERI 25 年。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14372
Melissa M. Garrido PhD, Amy M. Kilbourne PhD MPH
<p>The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is among the nation's largest integrated health systems and among the largest learning health systems. A learning health system combines institution-specific data generation and evaluation with context from the broader research, clinical, and policy communities to inform and implement approaches to improve access to, quality, efficiency, and cost of care.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Instrumental to the establishment of the VHA as a learning health system was the founding of the national Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program, an operational evaluation and quality improvement program. QUERI was established in 1998, and in the years since its founding, initiatives have evolved from implementation of guideline-based care for specific conditions to the conduct of system-wide quality improvement and implementation science efforts to the support of evidence-based policymaking.<span><sup>3-5</sup></span> This special issue highlights scientific contributions and real-world impacts emanating from 25 years of initiatives stemming from QUERI that reflect rapid translation of research into practice.</p><p>QUERI was established with a goal of becoming “…a national system to translate research discoveries and innovations into patient care and health systems improvement”.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Initial translation efforts were focused on nine conditions or groups of conditions that are prevalent among veterans: heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, type II diabetes, colorectal cancer, prostate disease, spinal cord injury, HIV/AIDS, mental health conditions, and substance use disorders. This initial focus laid the groundwork for projects featured in an article in this issue by Damschroder, Hamilton, and colleagues, who summarize the far-reaching impacts from a decade of diabetes-focused QUERI projects.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Evaluations of the implementation of the VA's Diabetes Prevention Program led to insights into how to improve the reach of other, related programs; the effectiveness of an online version of the program; and the importance of gender-specific tailoring of prevention programs.</p><p>In the past decade, QUERI has expanded its focus to address broader health system issues that affect multiple conditions and veterans' overall well-being.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Choice Act) mandated the creation of a commission to examine methods to improve veterans' access to care. In their report, the Commission on Care recommended that the VA leverage data and continuous improvement principles to ensure equitable access to high-quality care.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Around the same time, the Office of Management and Budget urged federal agencies to use evidence to support budget and operational decisions.<span><sup>8</sup></span> QUERI's expanded focus was in response to these recommendations, notably by using a learning health system
退伍军人医疗管理局(VHA)是美国最大的综合医疗系统之一,也是最大的学习型医疗系统之一。学习型医疗系统将特定机构的数据生成和评估与更广泛的研究、临床和政策社区的背景相结合,为改善医疗服务的可及性、质量、效率和成本提供信息并实施相关方法。QUERI 成立于 1998 年,在其成立后的数年中,各项举措已从针对特定病症实施基于指南的护理发展到开展全系统的质量改进和实施科学工作,再到支持循证决策。本特刊重点介绍了 25 年来由 QUERI 发起的各项活动所产生的科学贡献和现实影响,这些活动反映了研究成果向实践的快速转化。QUERI 成立的目标是成为"......一个将研究发现和创新成果转化为患者护理和卫生系统改进的国家系统"。3 最初的转化工作侧重于退伍军人中普遍存在的九种疾病或九组疾病:心脏病、脑血管疾病、II 型糖尿病、结肠直肠癌、前列腺疾病、脊髓损伤、艾滋病毒/艾滋病、精神健康状况和药物使用障碍。Damschroder 和 Hamilton 及其同事在本期文章中总结了十年来以糖尿病为重点的 QUERI 项目所产生的深远影响。对退伍军人事务部糖尿病预防计划实施情况的评估使人们深入了解了如何提高其他相关计划的覆盖范围;该计划在线版本的有效性;以及针对不同性别定制预防计划的重要性。在过去的十年中,QUERI 已将其重点扩大到解决影响多种疾病和退伍军人整体福祉的更广泛的医疗系统问题。护理委员会在其报告中建议退伍军人事务部利用数据和持续改进原则来确保公平地获得高质量的护理服务。7 与此同时,管理和预算办公室敦促联邦机构利用证据来支持预算和运营决策。8 QUERI 的重点扩大正是为了响应这些建议,特别是通过使用学习型医疗系统框架来生成证据和评估质量改进策略,为政策提供信息。Shannon 等人分析了退伍军人事务部的 "患者医疗体验调查 "数据,发现了退伍军人事务部医疗服务中存在的种族差异,尤其是属于代表性不足群体的退伍军人。10 Leung 等人发现,心理健康和初级保健服务的综合提供与较高的短期抑郁症随访率有关,但与治疗完成率无关。11 作为其关注持续质量改进的一部分,QUERI 支持对实施循证项目和治疗的不同策略的有效性进行研究。本期将介绍针对肥胖症、无家可归者、阿片类药物使用障碍和患者安全等项目实施情况的评估。Damschroder 及其同事发现,虽然虚拟质量改进培训项目并不能提高体重管理项目的覆盖率,但却与质量改进方法的使用率提高有关。12 Wyse 及其同事介绍了一项实施策略的开发情况,该策略旨在提高阿片类药物使用障碍退伍军人在初级医疗机构获得丁丙诺啡的机会。 5 此外,卫生系统研究组合为创新中心和研究联盟提供资金,以支持卫生系统研究的基础学习,即实施科学;数据科学和信息学;患者、提供者和社区参与科学;系统科学;以及政策科学和分析。33 QUERI 和退伍军人医疗系统研究中心共同致力于开发和转化证据,以改善五重目标,包括改善医疗服务的获取、质量、成本和价值、公平性和体验,成为如何利用学习型医疗系统将证据转化为实践和政策的全国典范。
{"title":"Evolution of the Veterans Health Administration Learning Health System: 25 years of QUERI","authors":"Melissa M. Garrido PhD,&nbsp;Amy M. Kilbourne PhD MPH","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14372","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14372","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is among the nation's largest integrated health systems and among the largest learning health systems. A learning health system combines institution-specific data generation and evaluation with context from the broader research, clinical, and policy communities to inform and implement approaches to improve access to, quality, efficiency, and cost of care.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Instrumental to the establishment of the VHA as a learning health system was the founding of the national Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program, an operational evaluation and quality improvement program. QUERI was established in 1998, and in the years since its founding, initiatives have evolved from implementation of guideline-based care for specific conditions to the conduct of system-wide quality improvement and implementation science efforts to the support of evidence-based policymaking.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3-5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This special issue highlights scientific contributions and real-world impacts emanating from 25 years of initiatives stemming from QUERI that reflect rapid translation of research into practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;QUERI was established with a goal of becoming “…a national system to translate research discoveries and innovations into patient care and health systems improvement”.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Initial translation efforts were focused on nine conditions or groups of conditions that are prevalent among veterans: heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, type II diabetes, colorectal cancer, prostate disease, spinal cord injury, HIV/AIDS, mental health conditions, and substance use disorders. This initial focus laid the groundwork for projects featured in an article in this issue by Damschroder, Hamilton, and colleagues, who summarize the far-reaching impacts from a decade of diabetes-focused QUERI projects.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Evaluations of the implementation of the VA's Diabetes Prevention Program led to insights into how to improve the reach of other, related programs; the effectiveness of an online version of the program; and the importance of gender-specific tailoring of prevention programs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the past decade, QUERI has expanded its focus to address broader health system issues that affect multiple conditions and veterans' overall well-being.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (Choice Act) mandated the creation of a commission to examine methods to improve veterans' access to care. In their report, the Commission on Care recommended that the VA leverage data and continuous improvement principles to ensure equitable access to high-quality care.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Around the same time, the Office of Management and Budget urged federal agencies to use evidence to support budget and operational decisions.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; QUERI's expanded focus was in response to these recommendations, notably by using a learning health system","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The foundational science of learning health systems 学习保健系统的基础科学。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14374
Amy M. Kilbourne PhD, MPH, Amanda E. Borsky DrPH, MPP, Robert W. O'Brien PhD, Melissa Z. Braganza MPH, Melissa M. Garrido PhD
<p>The National Academy of Medicine's <i>Future of Health Services Research</i> report<span><sup>1</sup></span> called for researchers to better address the system-level priorities facing health-care organizations, patients, and communities to achieve meaningful impacts on population health outcomes. The report strongly recommended that future research initiatives support close partnerships with health-care organization leaders and the end-users they serve (e.g., patients, providers, and communities) to ensure their priorities are addressed. When aligned with health-care organization and end-user priorities, health services research has great potential to facilitate the translation of research into practice that supports population health goals (e.g., access, outcomes, equity, experience, and value) in health-care organizations and communities.</p><p>Moreover, U.S. health-care organizations are increasingly embracing learning health systems<span><sup>2-4</sup></span> and the Quintuple Aim framework (improve access, outcomes, equity, experience, and value of care) to better align research with health-care organization goals.<span><sup>5, 6</sup></span> The National Academy of Medicine defined learning health systems (LHSs) as when “science, informatics, incentives, and culture are aligned to support continuous improvement, innovation, and seamlessly embed knowledge and best practices into research and care delivery.<span><sup>2</sup></span>” An LHS is led by a learning community comprised of health-care organization leaders, investigators, end-users, and other affected groups who identify shared health priority goals and support continuous, standardized processes that curate multi-level data for ongoing research and quality improvement initiatives that support meeting these goals.</p><p>Funding priorities therefore need to be aligned with these NAM recommendations to incentivize investigators to conduct partnered LHS research focused on Quintuple Aim goals. Nonetheless, LHSs are impeded by a lack of funding sources to enable their development and investigator involvement.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Differences in research and quality improvement timelines and regulations also impede their ability to sustain research and quality improvement initiatives over time.<span><sup>8</sup></span> LHSs require upfront administrative and data analytics infrastructure to enable involved parties to set priorities, plan and conduct the research and quality improvement initiatives, curate and maintain primary and secondary data over time, and ensure compliance with research and quality improvement regulations.<span><sup>9</sup></span> While investigators can garner external research funding, this typically supports hypothesis-driven scientific inquiry but not the required infrastructure to enable ongoing administration and data curation to optimize LHS functions. Moreover, research and quality improvement efforts are siloed due to different regulations regarding da
美国国家医学院的卫生服务未来研究报告1呼吁研究人员更好地解决卫生保健组织、患者和社区面临的系统级优先事项,以对人口健康结果产生有意义的影响。报告强烈建议,今后的研究举措应支持与卫生保健组织领导人及其服务的最终用户(例如患者、提供者和社区)建立密切伙伴关系,以确保解决其优先事项。卫生服务研究如果与卫生保健组织和最终用户的优先事项保持一致,就有很大潜力促进将研究成果转化为实践,从而支持卫生保健组织和社区的人口健康目标(例如获取、成果、公平、经验和价值)。此外,美国卫生保健组织正越来越多地采用学习型卫生保健系统2-4和“五重目标”框架(改善获取、结果、公平、经验和护理价值),以更好地将研究与卫生保健组织的目标结合起来。5,6美国国家医学院(National Academy of Medicine)将学习型卫生系统(lhs)定义为“科学、信息学、激励和文化相结合,以支持持续改进、创新,并将知识和最佳实践无缝地嵌入研究和医疗服务中。”LHS由一个学习型社区领导,该社区由卫生保健组织领导人、调查人员、最终用户和其他受影响的群体组成,他们确定共同的卫生优先目标,并支持持续的、标准化的流程,为正在进行的研究和支持实现这些目标的质量改进举措整理多层次的数据。因此,资助优先事项需要与不结盟运动的建议保持一致,以激励研究人员开展以五项目标为重点的LHS合作研究。然而,由于缺乏资金来源,lhs的发展和研究者的参与受到阻碍在研究和质量改进时间表和法规方面的差异也阻碍了他们随着时间的推移维持研究和质量改进计划的能力lhs需要预先管理和数据分析基础设施,以使相关各方能够设定优先级,计划和实施研究和质量改进计划,管理和维护主要和次要数据,并确保符合研究和质量改进法规虽然研究人员可以获得外部研究资金,但这通常支持假设驱动的科学探究,而不是实现持续管理和数据管理以优化LHS功能所需的基础设施。此外,由于有关数据管理和干预监测的不同法规(例如,研究临床试验需要持续监测和预先规范干预和分析),研究和质量改进工作被孤立。研究可能需要数年时间才能取得成果,而卫生保健组织领导人需要更快地得到答案,这阻碍了直接告知卫生系统目标改进情况的机会。8 .为了更好地使国家研究经费与人口健康目标保持一致,需要更新科学议程,以支持在发展和维持lhs方面的创新。优化LHS基础设施和能力的基础研究使医疗保健组织能够更好地将研究与质量改进目标结合起来,从而改进“五项目标”的目标。目前以LHS为重点的资助机制侧重于为早期职业研究者提供LHS核心能力的培训机会,例如实施科学、信息学、系统科学和最终用户参与。然而,要使保健组织充分利用受训者的新知识,就需要建立新的供资机制,这种机制既要以科学调查为基础,又可以直接用于改善卫生保健基础设施,最终维持一个可重复的过程,产生新的研究和质量改进倡议,以改善人口健康。根据不结盟运动卫生服务研究的未来和学习型卫生系统报告,我们为资助机构提出了一个更新的科学议程,以支持学习型卫生系统的发展和维持方面的创新,使研究与卫生保健组织和五项目标保持一致。这一科学议程包括LHS的基本方法,这些方法来源于医疗保健研究和质量局LHS的核心竞争力10,13,以及基于美国退伍军人事务部(VA)研究与发展办公室(ORD)卫生系统研究项目的资助机制和优先事项。14-17 LHS科学议程的基础方法包括实施科学、数据科学、参与科学、系统科学和政策分析。 另一个例子涉及使用电子健康记录数据(P2D)确定儿科手术结果的差距,评估减少并发症的有效策略(例如,缝合伤口),并在常规实践中应用这些策略(K2P) 29较长期周期通常涉及研究方案,包括,例如,发现保健差距,了解差距的根源,以及在特定实践环境中测试减轻差距的干预措施对干预研究结果的评估也可能发现亚人群在质量和公平性方面的新差距,从而为重复的调查和改进周期提供信息。最终,学习周期使医疗保健组织能够确定、严格研究和应用从LHS基本方法中衍生出来的有效工具或战略,以改进“五大目标”的目标。反过来,研究和质量改进的可重复周期也可以为LHS基础方法的创新提供信息。例如,实施和参与科学方面的基础研究为卫生保健领导人和调查人员如何更好地培养最终用户观点并将其纳入干预措施和实施战略的共同设计提供了信息。研究人员设计了一个新的患者参与过程,以引出临床干预措施的输入,也可以应用类似的过程来确定下一个学习周期迭代的新优先事项。数据和系统科学方法有助于优化临床工作流程,从而能够更有效地研究新的干预措施或质量改进实践(例如,为临床试验资格提供患者层面的精确健康数据,并将环境口述记录到电子健康记录中,以减轻提供者的工作量)。数据、系统和实施科学方面的创新可以改进质量改进过程的自动化,例如审计和反馈或过程映射。政策科学可以告知新的保健支付模式或监管救济如何能够改善保健质量,加强保健组织领导对正在进行的研究干预或质量改进举措的支持。以下是实施lhs的美国医疗保健组织的两个例子。两者都具有使用不同的资金来源和使用LHS基本方法的企业范围的基础设施来构建和维持LHS的经验。范德比尔特大学医学中心从其医疗保健组织和美国国立卫生研究院的国家加速转化科学临床和转化科学奖励计划中心筹集资金,为LHS平台提供资金。该平台利用电子健康记录数据部署新药物的务实试验和其他干预措施,如阿片类药物使用障碍的社区护理协调32或改善临床医生处方的实施战略LHS平台还使用参与和系统科学,最终用户选择优先主题领域(P2D),并帮助设计研究,确保结果和方法符合临床工作流程(D2K)。研究者和临床合作伙伴还在整个研究执行中应用护理点随机化,以最大限度地提高严谨性(K2P)。在退伍军人事务部,妇女健康研究网络(WHRN)包括超过75个临床实践站点,支持研究和质量改进,以加强为女性退伍军人提供循证护理。34使用参与科学,WHRN收集退伍军人在获取和护理质量方面的差距的快速反馈,为退伍军人事务部领导人和调查员提供共享研究和质量改进目标(P2D)。WHRN还支持研究人员开发新的研究干预措施(D2K)和实施战略,将研究成果传播到实践中(K2P)当WHRN支持多站点研究计划所需的基础设施时,调查人员也参与了queri资助的通过参与和保留增强妇女身心健康(EMPOWER)计划,该计划支持正在进行的数据管理和质量改进计划,以解决WHRN的优先事项。36 . LHS科学议程阐明了核心的基本方法,使研究人员、卫生系统领导者和最终用户能够共同研究和应用工具,以改善特定卫生保健组织的人口健康。这些基本方法以及学习周期还为资助机构提供了LHS研究路线图,说明发现如何同时支持创新、卫生系统改进和五项目标。 通过利用现有数据确定五项目标的绩效差距,卫生保健服务使卫生保健组织和调查人员能够管理更全面的数据和知识(证据),支持解决这些差距的干预措施,然后扩大规模,以改善总体绩效和人口健康目标。理想情况下,资金充足的卫生服务机构支持调查人员和临床业务小组开展研究和质量改进项目,重点关注共同的卫生优先目标,促进从电子卫生记录和其他来源(例如卫生信息交换和移动技术)提取和分析数据。为此,LHS利用内部保健组织和外部(例如联邦和私人基金会)资源,支持学习社区从受影响的用户和人员那里收集投入和优先事项,以支持
{"title":"The foundational science of learning health systems","authors":"Amy M. Kilbourne PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Amanda E. Borsky DrPH, MPP,&nbsp;Robert W. O'Brien PhD,&nbsp;Melissa Z. Braganza MPH,&nbsp;Melissa M. Garrido PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14374","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14374","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The National Academy of Medicine's &lt;i&gt;Future of Health Services Research&lt;/i&gt; report&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; called for researchers to better address the system-level priorities facing health-care organizations, patients, and communities to achieve meaningful impacts on population health outcomes. The report strongly recommended that future research initiatives support close partnerships with health-care organization leaders and the end-users they serve (e.g., patients, providers, and communities) to ensure their priorities are addressed. When aligned with health-care organization and end-user priorities, health services research has great potential to facilitate the translation of research into practice that supports population health goals (e.g., access, outcomes, equity, experience, and value) in health-care organizations and communities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, U.S. health-care organizations are increasingly embracing learning health systems&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2-4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and the Quintuple Aim framework (improve access, outcomes, equity, experience, and value of care) to better align research with health-care organization goals.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5, 6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The National Academy of Medicine defined learning health systems (LHSs) as when “science, informatics, incentives, and culture are aligned to support continuous improvement, innovation, and seamlessly embed knowledge and best practices into research and care delivery.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;” An LHS is led by a learning community comprised of health-care organization leaders, investigators, end-users, and other affected groups who identify shared health priority goals and support continuous, standardized processes that curate multi-level data for ongoing research and quality improvement initiatives that support meeting these goals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funding priorities therefore need to be aligned with these NAM recommendations to incentivize investigators to conduct partnered LHS research focused on Quintuple Aim goals. Nonetheless, LHSs are impeded by a lack of funding sources to enable their development and investigator involvement.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Differences in research and quality improvement timelines and regulations also impede their ability to sustain research and quality improvement initiatives over time.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; LHSs require upfront administrative and data analytics infrastructure to enable involved parties to set priorities, plan and conduct the research and quality improvement initiatives, curate and maintain primary and secondary data over time, and ensure compliance with research and quality improvement regulations.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; While investigators can garner external research funding, this typically supports hypothesis-driven scientific inquiry but not the required infrastructure to enable ongoing administration and data curation to optimize LHS functions. Moreover, research and quality improvement efforts are siloed due to different regulations regarding da","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622276/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisite family caregiver skills training program 阶梯式楔形分组随机试验,评估多地点家庭照顾者技能培训计划的有效性。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14326
Courtney Harold Van Houtven PhD, Cynthia J. Coffman PhD, Kasey Decosimo MPH, Janet M. Grubber MSPH, Joshua Dadolf MSW, Caitlin Sullivan MS, Matthew Tucker BA, Rebecca Bruening MPH, Nina R. Sperber PhD, Karen M. Stechuchak MS, Megan Shepherd-Banigan PhD, Nathan Boucher DrPH, Jessica E. Ma MD, Brystana G. Kaufman PhD, Cathleen S. Colón-Emeric MD, MHS, George L. Jackson PhD, MHA, Teresa M. Damush PhD, Leah Christensen MSW, Virginia Wang PhD, Kelli D. Allen PhD, Susan N. Hastings MD, MHS

Objective

To assess the effects of an evidence-based family caregiver training program (implementation of Helping Invested Families Improve Veteran Experiences Study [iHI-FIVES]) in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system on Veteran days not at home and family caregiver well-being.

Data Sources and Study Setting

Participants included Veterans referred to home- and community-based services with an identified caregiver across 8 medical centers and confirmed family caregivers of eligible Veterans.

Study Design

In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval for starting iHI-FIVES and received standardized implementation support. The primary outcome, number of Veteran “days not at home,” and secondary outcomes, changes over 3 months in measures of caregiver well-being, were compared between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES intervals using generalized linear models including covariates.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Patient data were extracted from the electronic health record. Caregiver data were collected from 2 telephone-based surveys.

Principal Findings

Overall, n = 898 eligible Veterans were identified across pre-iHI-FIVES (n = 327) and post-iHI-FIVES intervals (n = 571). Just under one fifth (17%) of Veterans in post-iHI-FIVES intervals had a caregiver enroll in iHI-FIVES. Veteran and caregiver demographics in pre-iHI-FIVES intervals were similar to those in post-iHI-FIVES intervals. In adjusted models, the estimated rate of days not at home over 6-months was 42% lower (rate ratio = 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.09; p = 0.09]) post-iHI-FIVES compared with pre-iHI-FIVES. The estimated mean days not at home over a 6-month period was 13.0 days pre-iHI-FIVES and 7.5 post-iHI-FIVES. There were no differences between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES in change over 3 months in caregiver well-being measures.

Conclusions

Reducing days not at home is consistent with effectiveness because more time at home increases quality of life. In this study, after adjusting for Veteran characteristics, we did not find evidence that implementation of a caregiver training program yielded a reduction in Veteran's days not at home.

目的评估退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中循证家庭照顾者培训计划(帮助投资家庭改善退伍军人经历研究[iHI-FIVES]的实施)对退伍军人不在家天数和家庭照顾者福祉的影响:参与者包括转诊到 8 个医疗中心接受家庭和社区服务并有确定照顾者的退伍军人,以及经确认符合条件的退伍军人家庭照顾者:研究设计:在一项阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中,研究机构被随机分配在 6 个月的时间间隔内启动 iHI-FIVES,并接受标准化的实施支持。使用包括协变量在内的广义线性模型比较了 iHI-FIVES 实施前和实施后时间间隔的主要结果(退伍军人 "不在家的天数")和次要结果(3 个月内照顾者幸福感指标的变化):患者数据来自电子健康记录。护理人员的数据来自两次电话调查:总体而言,在 iHI-FIVES 前(n = 327)和 iHI-FIVES 后(n = 571)期间,共确定了 n = 898 名符合条件的退伍军人。在 iHI-FIVES 后的区间内,仅有不到五分之一(17%)的退伍军人的护理人员参加了 iHI-FIVES。iHI-FIVES 前间隔期的退伍军人和护理人员的人口统计学特征与 iHI-FIVES 后间隔期的相似。在调整后的模型中,iHI-FIVES 后与 iHI-FIVES 前相比,6 个月内不在家天数的估计比率降低了 42%(比率比 = 0.58 [95% 置信区间:0.31-1.09;p = 0.09])。据估计,iHI-FIVES 实施前 6 个月内不在家的平均天数为 13.0 天,iHI-FIVES 实施后为 7.5 天。iHI-FIVES实施前和实施后3个月内,护理人员的幸福指数变化没有差异:结论:减少不在家的天数是有效的,因为在家的时间越多,生活质量就越高。在本研究中,在对退伍军人的特征进行调整后,我们没有发现实施护理人员培训计划能减少退伍军人不在家天数的证据。
{"title":"A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisite family caregiver skills training program","authors":"Courtney Harold Van Houtven PhD,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Coffman PhD,&nbsp;Kasey Decosimo MPH,&nbsp;Janet M. Grubber MSPH,&nbsp;Joshua Dadolf MSW,&nbsp;Caitlin Sullivan MS,&nbsp;Matthew Tucker BA,&nbsp;Rebecca Bruening MPH,&nbsp;Nina R. Sperber PhD,&nbsp;Karen M. Stechuchak MS,&nbsp;Megan Shepherd-Banigan PhD,&nbsp;Nathan Boucher DrPH,&nbsp;Jessica E. Ma MD,&nbsp;Brystana G. Kaufman PhD,&nbsp;Cathleen S. Colón-Emeric MD, MHS,&nbsp;George L. Jackson PhD, MHA,&nbsp;Teresa M. Damush PhD,&nbsp;Leah Christensen MSW,&nbsp;Virginia Wang PhD,&nbsp;Kelli D. Allen PhD,&nbsp;Susan N. Hastings MD, MHS","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14326","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14326","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the effects of an evidence-based family caregiver training program (implementation of Helping Invested Families Improve Veteran Experiences Study [iHI-FIVES]) in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system on Veteran days <i>not</i> at home and family caregiver well-being.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants included Veterans referred to home- and community-based services with an identified caregiver across 8 medical centers and confirmed family caregivers of eligible Veterans.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Study Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval for starting iHI-FIVES and received standardized implementation support. The primary outcome, number of Veteran “days <i>not</i> at home,” and secondary outcomes, changes over 3 months in measures of caregiver well-being, were compared between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES intervals using generalized linear models including covariates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patient data were extracted from the electronic health record. Caregiver data were collected from 2 telephone-based surveys.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, <i>n</i> = 898 eligible Veterans were identified across pre-iHI-FIVES (<i>n</i> = 327) and post-iHI-FIVES intervals (<i>n</i> = 571). Just under one fifth (17%) of Veterans in post-iHI-FIVES intervals had a caregiver enroll in iHI-FIVES. Veteran and caregiver demographics in pre-iHI-FIVES intervals were similar to those in post-iHI-FIVES intervals. In adjusted models, the estimated rate of days <i>not</i> at home over 6-months was 42% lower (rate ratio = 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.09]) post-iHI-FIVES compared with pre-iHI-FIVES. The estimated mean days <i>not</i> at home over a 6-month period was 13.0 days pre-iHI-FIVES and 7.5 post-iHI-FIVES. There were no differences between pre- and post-iHI-FIVES in change over 3 months in caregiver well-being measures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Reducing days <i>not</i> at home is consistent with effectiveness because more time at home increases quality of life. In this study, after adjusting for Veteran characteristics, we did not find evidence that implementation of a caregiver training program yielded a reduction in Veteran's days <i>not</i> at home.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of telehealth cost-sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high-deductible health plans 远程医疗费用分摊对医疗保健利用率的影响:来自高免赔额医疗计划的证据。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14343
Risha Gidwani DrPH, Veronica Yank MD, Lane Burgette PhD, Aaron Kofner MS, MA, Steven M. Asch MD, MPH, Zachary Wagner PhD

Objective

Evaluate whether cost-sharing decreases led high-deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare.

Data Sources, Study Setting

National sample of chronically-ill patients age 18–64 from 2018 to 2020 (n = 1,318,178).

Study Design

Difference-in-differences analyses using entropy-balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost-sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non-HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost-sharing for telehealth, while non-HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Outcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost-sharing, we further evaluated use of non-$0 telehealth as a placebo test.

Principal Findings

There was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (p = 0.84), with chronicall-ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non-HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9-month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07–0.09, p < 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (ß = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, p < 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non-$0 telehealth than non-HDHP enrollees (ß = −0.01, 95%CI −0.02, 0.00, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Recent-but-expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically-ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.

目标:评估费用分摊的减少是否会导致高自付额医疗计划(HDHP)参保者增加医疗保健的使用:评估费用分担的减少是否会导致高免赔额医疗计划(HDHP)参保者增加医疗保健的使用:研究设计:研究设计:使用熵平衡权重进行差异分析,以评估与非 HDHP 参保者相比,远程医疗费用分摊为 0 美元的政策转变对 HDHP 利用率的影响。由于这一冲击,HDHP 参保者的远程保健费用分摊额大幅下降,而非 HDHP 参保者的下降幅度较小。数据收集/提取方法:结果包括使用任何门诊护理;使用 0 美元远程保健;使用 0 美元远程保健占所有门诊护理的比例;以及使用任何远程保健。为了检验是否存在因偏好护理方式而非费用分担导致的差异,我们进一步评估了非 0 美元远程保健的使用情况,作为安慰剂试验:总体门诊就诊人次的变化没有差异(p = 0.84),长期慢性病的 HDHP 参保者在政策转变前后使用的护理服务都较少。然而,与非 HDHP 参保者相比,HDHP 参保者在 9 个月内增加了 0.08 美元的远程医疗,增幅为 27%(95% CI 0.07-0.09,p 结论):最近出台但即将到期的联邦法律规定,在 2023 年和 2024 年提供的医疗服务中,远程医疗免去了 HDHP 的免赔额。我们的研究结果表明,扩大该立法提供的保护范围有助于缩小加入 HDHP 的慢性病患者在获得医疗服务方面的差距。
{"title":"The impact of telehealth cost-sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high-deductible health plans","authors":"Risha Gidwani DrPH,&nbsp;Veronica Yank MD,&nbsp;Lane Burgette PhD,&nbsp;Aaron Kofner MS, MA,&nbsp;Steven M. Asch MD, MPH,&nbsp;Zachary Wagner PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14343","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14343","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Evaluate whether cost-sharing decreases led high-deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Sources, Study Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>National sample of chronically-ill patients age 18–64 from 2018 to 2020 (<i>n</i> = 1,318,178).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Study Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Difference-in-differences analyses using entropy-balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost-sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non-HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost-sharing for telehealth, while non-HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Outcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost-sharing, we further evaluated use of non-$0 telehealth as a placebo test.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (<i>p</i> = 0.84), with chronicall-ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non-HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9-month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07–0.09, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (<i>ß</i> = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non-$0 telehealth than non-HDHP enrollees (<i>ß</i> = −0.01, 95%CI −0.02, 0.00, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Recent-but-expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically-ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between mandatory bundled payments and changes in socioeconomic disparities for joint replacement outcomes 强制性捆绑支付与关节置换结果的社会经济差异变化之间的关联。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14369
Austin S. Kilaru MD MSHP, Joshua M. Liao MD MSc, Erkuan Wang MA, Yueming Zhao MPH, Jingsan Zhu MS MBA, Grace Ng MD MSHP, Torrey Shirk BA, Deborah S. Cousins MSPH, Genevieve P. Kanter PhD, Said Ibrahim MD MPH MBA, Amol S. Navathe MD PhD
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To determine whether mandatory participation by hospitals in bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) was associated with changes in outcome disparities for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3> <p>We used Medicare claims data for beneficiaries undergoing LEJR in the United States between 2011 and 2017.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Study Design</h3> <p>We conducted a retrospective observational study using a differences-in-differences method to compare changes in outcome disparities between dual-eligible and non-dual eligible beneficiaries after hospital participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program. The primary outcome was LEJR complications. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and mortality.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Extraction Methods</h3> <p>We identified hospitals in the US market areas eligible for CJR. We included beneficiaries in the intervention group who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets randomized to participate in CJR. The comparison group included patients who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets who were eligible for CJR but randomized to control.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Principal Findings</h3> <p>The study included 1,603,555 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 74.6 years, 64.3% women, 11.0% dual-eligible). Among participant hospitals, complications decreased between baseline and intervention periods from 11.0% to 10.1% for dual-eligible and 7.0% to 6.4% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. Among nonparticipant hospitals, complications decreased from 10.3% to 9.8% for dual-eligible and 6.7% to 6.0% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In adjusted analysis, CJR participation was associated with a reduced difference in complications between dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (−0.9 percentage points, 95% CI −1.6 to −0.1). The reduction in disparities was observed among hospitals without prior experience in a voluntary LEJR bundled payment model. There were no differential changes in 90-day readmissions or mortality.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>Mandatory participation in a bundled payment program was associated with reduced disparities in joint replacement complications for Medic
目的:确定医院强制参与下肢关节置换术(LEJR)的捆绑支付是否与符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格患者的治疗结果差异变化有关:确定医院强制参与下肢关节置换术(LEJR)的捆绑支付是否与符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格的患者的结果差异变化有关:我们使用了 2011 年至 2017 年期间美国接受下肢关节置换术的受益人的医疗保险报销数据:我们采用差异法进行了一项回顾性观察研究,比较医院参与关节置换综合护理(CJR)计划后,符合双重资格和不符合双重资格的受益人之间的结果差异变化。主要结果是 LEJR 并发症。次要结果包括 90 天再入院率和死亡率:我们确定了美国市场上符合 CJR 条件的医院。我们将在随机参与 CJR 市场的医院接受关节置换术的受益人纳入干预组。对比组包括在符合 CJR 条件但被随机纳入对照组的市场中的医院接受关节置换术的患者:该研究纳入了 1,603,555 名医疗保险受益人(平均年龄 74.6 岁,64.3% 为女性,11.0% 具有双重资格)。在参与医院中,双保险受益人的并发症发生率在基线期和干预期之间从 11.0% 降至 10.1%,非双保险受益人的并发症发生率从 7.0% 降至 6.4%。在非参与医院中,双合格受益人的并发症发生率从 10.3% 降至 9.8%,非双合格受益人的并发症发生率从 6.7% 降至 6.0%。在调整后的分析中,参与 CJR 与双重资格受益人和非双重资格受益人之间并发症的差异减少有关(-0.9 个百分点,95% CI -1.6 至 -0.1)。在未参与过自愿性 LEJR 捆绑付费模式的医院中观察到了差异的缩小。90天再入院率或死亡率没有发生差异变化:结论:强制参与捆绑支付项目与减少低收入医疗保险受益人关节置换并发症的差异有关。据我们所知,这是基于价值的支付模式下社会经济差异减少的首个证据。
{"title":"Association between mandatory bundled payments and changes in socioeconomic disparities for joint replacement outcomes","authors":"Austin S. Kilaru MD MSHP,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao MD MSc,&nbsp;Erkuan Wang MA,&nbsp;Yueming Zhao MPH,&nbsp;Jingsan Zhu MS MBA,&nbsp;Grace Ng MD MSHP,&nbsp;Torrey Shirk BA,&nbsp;Deborah S. Cousins MSPH,&nbsp;Genevieve P. Kanter PhD,&nbsp;Said Ibrahim MD MPH MBA,&nbsp;Amol S. Navathe MD PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14369","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14369","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To determine whether mandatory participation by hospitals in bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) was associated with changes in outcome disparities for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Sources and Study Setting&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We used Medicare claims data for beneficiaries undergoing LEJR in the United States between 2011 and 2017.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Study Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We conducted a retrospective observational study using a differences-in-differences method to compare changes in outcome disparities between dual-eligible and non-dual eligible beneficiaries after hospital participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program. The primary outcome was LEJR complications. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and mortality.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Extraction Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We identified hospitals in the US market areas eligible for CJR. We included beneficiaries in the intervention group who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets randomized to participate in CJR. The comparison group included patients who received joint replacement at hospitals in markets who were eligible for CJR but randomized to control.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Principal Findings&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The study included 1,603,555 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 74.6 years, 64.3% women, 11.0% dual-eligible). Among participant hospitals, complications decreased between baseline and intervention periods from 11.0% to 10.1% for dual-eligible and 7.0% to 6.4% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. Among nonparticipant hospitals, complications decreased from 10.3% to 9.8% for dual-eligible and 6.7% to 6.0% for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. In adjusted analysis, CJR participation was associated with a reduced difference in complications between dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries (−0.9 percentage points, 95% CI −1.6 to −0.1). The reduction in disparities was observed among hospitals without prior experience in a voluntary LEJR bundled payment model. There were no differential changes in 90-day readmissions or mortality.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Mandatory participation in a bundled payment program was associated with reduced disparities in joint replacement complications for Medic","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14369","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141918168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Availability of behavioral health crisis care and associated changes in emergency department utilization. 行为健康危机护理的可用性及急诊室使用率的相关变化。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14368
Ashlyn Burns, Joshua R Vest, Nir Menachemi, Olena Mazurenko, Paul I Musey, Michelle P Salyers, Valerie A Yeager

Objective: To determine whether availability of behavioral health crisis care services is associated with changes in emergency department (ED) utilization.

Data sources and study setting: We used longitudinal panel data (2016-2021) on ED utilization from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State ED Databases and a novel dataset on crisis care services compiled using information from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Directories of Mental Health Treatment Facilities. A total of 1002 unique zip codes from Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, and Wisconsin were included in our analyses.

Study design: To estimate the effect of crisis care availability on ED utilization, we used a linear regression model with zip code and year fixed effects and standard errors accounting for clustering at the zip code-level. ED utilization related to mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental (MBD) disorders served as our primary outcome. We also examined pregnancy-related ED utilization as a nonequivalent dependent variable to assess residual bias in effect estimates.

Data collection/extraction methods: We extracted data on crisis care services offered by mental health treatment facilities (n = 14,726 facility-years) from the National Directories. MBD-related ED utilization was assessed by applying the Clinical Classification Software Refined from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to the primary ICD-10-CM diagnosis code on each ED encounter (n = 101,360,483). All data were aggregated to the zip code-level (n = 6012 zip-years).

Principal findings: The overall rate of MBD-related ED visits between 2016 and 2021 was 1610 annual visits per 100,000 population. Walk-in crisis stabilization services were associated with reduced MBD-related ED utilization (coefficient = -0.028, p = 0.009), but were not significantly associated with changes in pregnancy-related ED utilization.

Conclusions: Walk-in crisis stabilization services were associated with reductions in MBD-related ED utilization. Decision-makers looking to reduce MBD-related ED utilization should consider increasing access to this promising alternative model.

目的:确定行为健康危机护理服务的提供是否与急诊科(ED)使用率的变化有关:确定行为健康危机护理服务的可用性是否与急诊科(ED)使用率的变化有关:我们使用了 "医疗成本与利用项目"(Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project)的 "州急诊室数据库"(State ED Databases)中关于急诊室利用率的纵向面板数据(2016-2021 年),以及利用 "药物滥用与心理健康服务管理局"(Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration)的 "全国心理健康治疗机构目录"(National Directories of Mental Health Treatment Facilities)中的信息编制的危机护理服务新数据集。亚利桑那州、佛罗里达州、肯塔基州、马里兰州和威斯康星州共有 1002 个独特的邮政编码被纳入我们的分析中:为了估算危机护理的可用性对急诊室使用率的影响,我们使用了一个线性回归模型,该模型具有邮政编码和年份固定效应,标准误差考虑了邮政编码级别的聚类。与精神、行为和神经发育(MBD)障碍相关的急诊室使用率是我们的主要结果。我们还将与妊娠相关的急诊室使用率作为非等效因变量进行了研究,以评估效应估计中的残余偏差:我们从国家目录中提取了精神健康治疗机构提供的危机护理服务数据(n = 14,726 个机构年)。与 MBD 相关的急诊室使用情况是通过对每次急诊室就诊的主要 ICD-10-CM 诊断代码(n = 101,360,483)应用 "医疗保健成本与利用项目 "中的 "临床分类软件改进 "来评估的。所有数据汇总到邮政编码级别(n = 6012 个邮政编码年):主要发现:2016 年至 2021 年间,与 MBD 相关的急诊室就诊率为每 10 万人中每年 1610 人次。随访危机稳定服务与甲基溴相关急诊室使用率的降低有关(系数 = -0.028,p = 0.009),但与妊娠相关急诊室使用率的变化无显著关联:结论:随到随治的危机稳定服务与减少 MBD 相关的急诊室使用率有关。希望减少与 MBD 相关的急诊室使用率的决策者应考虑增加使用这种有前景的替代模式。
{"title":"Availability of behavioral health crisis care and associated changes in emergency department utilization.","authors":"Ashlyn Burns, Joshua R Vest, Nir Menachemi, Olena Mazurenko, Paul I Musey, Michelle P Salyers, Valerie A Yeager","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14368","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether availability of behavioral health crisis care services is associated with changes in emergency department (ED) utilization.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>We used longitudinal panel data (2016-2021) on ED utilization from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State ED Databases and a novel dataset on crisis care services compiled using information from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Directories of Mental Health Treatment Facilities. A total of 1002 unique zip codes from Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, and Wisconsin were included in our analyses.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>To estimate the effect of crisis care availability on ED utilization, we used a linear regression model with zip code and year fixed effects and standard errors accounting for clustering at the zip code-level. ED utilization related to mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental (MBD) disorders served as our primary outcome. We also examined pregnancy-related ED utilization as a nonequivalent dependent variable to assess residual bias in effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>We extracted data on crisis care services offered by mental health treatment facilities (n = 14,726 facility-years) from the National Directories. MBD-related ED utilization was assessed by applying the Clinical Classification Software Refined from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to the primary ICD-10-CM diagnosis code on each ED encounter (n = 101,360,483). All data were aggregated to the zip code-level (n = 6012 zip-years).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The overall rate of MBD-related ED visits between 2016 and 2021 was 1610 annual visits per 100,000 population. Walk-in crisis stabilization services were associated with reduced MBD-related ED utilization (coefficient = -0.028, p = 0.009), but were not significantly associated with changes in pregnancy-related ED utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walk-in crisis stabilization services were associated with reductions in MBD-related ED utilization. Decision-makers looking to reduce MBD-related ED utilization should consider increasing access to this promising alternative model.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial 多站点阶梯式楔形群随机家庭照顾者技能培训试验的实施成果。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14361
Courtney Harold Van Houtven PhD, Kasey Decosimo MPH, Connor Drake PhD, Rebecca Bruening MPH, Nina R. Sperber PhD, Joshua Dadolf MSW, Matthew Tucker BA, Cynthia J. Coffman PhD, Janet M. Grubber MSPH, Karen M. Stechuchak MS, Swetha Kota BA, MPH, Leah Christensen MSW, Cathleen Colón-Emeric MD, MHS, George L. Jackson PhD, MHA, Emily Franzosa DrPH, Leah L. Zullig PhD, Kelli D. Allen PhD, Susan N. Hastings MD, MHS, Virginia Wang PhD

Objective

To assess whether a team collaboration strategy (CONNECT) improves implementation outcomes of a family caregiver skills training program (iHI-FIVES).

Data Sources and Study Setting

iHI-FIVES was delivered to caregivers at eight Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Data sources were electronic health records, staff surveys, and interviews.

Study Design

In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval start date for iHI-FIVES launch. Sites were then randomized 1:1 to either (i) CONNECT, a team collaboration training strategy plus Replicating Effective Programs (REP), brief technical support training for staff, or (ii) REP only (non-CONNECT arm). Implementation outcomes included reach (proportion of eligible caregivers enrolled) and fidelity (proportion of expected trainings delivered). Staff interviews and surveys assessed team function including communication, implementation experience, and their relation to CONNECT and iHI-FIVES implementation outcomes.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

The sample for assessing implementation outcomes included 571 Veterans referred to VA home- and community-based services and their family caregivers eligible for iHI-FIVES. Prior to iHI-FIVES launch, staff completed 65 surveys and 62 interviews. After the start of iHI-FIVES, staff completed 52 surveys and 38 interviews. Mixed methods evaluated reach and fidelity by arm.

Principal Findings

Fidelity was high overall with 88% of expected iHI-FIVES trainings delivered, and higher among REP only (non-CONNECT) compared with CONNECT sites (95% vs. 80%). Reach was 18% (average proportion of reach across eight sites) and higher among non-CONNECT compared with CONNECT sites (22% vs. 14%). Qualitative interviews revealed strong leadership support at high-reach sites. CONNECT did not influence self-reported team function.

Conclusions

A team collaboration strategy (CONNECT), added to REP, required more resources to implement iHI-FIVES than REP only and did not substantially enhance reach or fidelity. Leadership support was a key condition of implementation success and may be an important factor for improving iHI-FIVES reach with national expansion.

目的:评估团队合作策略(CONNECT)是否能改善家庭护理人员技能培训计划(iHI-FIVES)的实施效果:评估团队协作策略(CONNECT)是否能改善家庭照顾者技能培训项目(iHI-FIVES)的实施效果。数据来源与研究环境:iHI-FIVES 在八个退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心向照顾者提供。数据来源包括电子健康记录、员工调查和访谈:研究设计:在一项阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中,研究机构被随机分配到一个为期 6 个月的 iHI-FIVES 启动日期。然后,各医疗点按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到 (i) CONNECT(团队协作培训策略)加 Replicating Effective Programs (REP)(针对员工的简短技术支持培训)或 (ii) 仅 REP(非 CONNECT 组)。实施结果包括覆盖范围(符合条件的护理人员参加培训的比例)和忠实度(完成预期培训的比例)。员工访谈和调查评估了团队功能,包括沟通、实施经验及其与 CONNECT 和 iHI-FIVES 实施结果的关系:评估实施成果的样本包括 571 名转诊至退伍军人事务部居家和社区服务机构的退伍军人及其符合 iHI-FIVES 条件的家庭护理人员。在 iHI-FIVES 启动之前,工作人员完成了 65 份调查和 62 次访谈。iHI-FIVES 启动后,工作人员完成了 52 份调查和 38 次访谈。混合方法评估了各部门的覆盖范围和忠实度:总体而言,忠实度很高,88% 的预期 iHI-FIVES 培训已完成,仅在 REP(非 CONNECT)中的忠实度高于 CONNECT 站点(95% 对 80%)。覆盖率为 18%(8 个项目点的平均覆盖率),非 CONNECT 项目点的覆盖率高于 CONNECT 项目点(22% 对 14%)。定性访谈显示,高覆盖率站点得到了领导层的大力支持。CONNECT 并未影响自我报告的团队功能:结论:在 REP 的基础上增加团队协作策略(CONNECT),实施 iHI-FIVES 所需的资源要多于仅实施 REP 所需的资源,而且并未显著提高覆盖率或忠实度。领导的支持是实施成功的关键条件,也可能是扩大 iHI-FIVES 在全国的覆盖面的重要因素。
{"title":"Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial","authors":"Courtney Harold Van Houtven PhD,&nbsp;Kasey Decosimo MPH,&nbsp;Connor Drake PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca Bruening MPH,&nbsp;Nina R. Sperber PhD,&nbsp;Joshua Dadolf MSW,&nbsp;Matthew Tucker BA,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Coffman PhD,&nbsp;Janet M. Grubber MSPH,&nbsp;Karen M. Stechuchak MS,&nbsp;Swetha Kota BA, MPH,&nbsp;Leah Christensen MSW,&nbsp;Cathleen Colón-Emeric MD, MHS,&nbsp;George L. Jackson PhD, MHA,&nbsp;Emily Franzosa DrPH,&nbsp;Leah L. Zullig PhD,&nbsp;Kelli D. Allen PhD,&nbsp;Susan N. Hastings MD, MHS,&nbsp;Virginia Wang PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14361","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14361","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess whether a team collaboration strategy (CONNECT) improves implementation outcomes of a family caregiver skills training program (iHI-FIVES).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>iHI-FIVES was delivered to caregivers at eight Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Data sources were electronic health records, staff surveys, and interviews.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Study Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval start date for iHI-FIVES launch. Sites were then randomized 1:1 to either (i) CONNECT, a team collaboration training strategy plus Replicating Effective Programs (REP), brief technical support training for staff, or (ii) REP only (non-CONNECT arm). Implementation outcomes included reach (proportion of eligible caregivers enrolled) and fidelity (proportion of expected trainings delivered). Staff interviews and surveys assessed team function including communication, implementation experience, and their relation to CONNECT and iHI-FIVES implementation outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The sample for assessing implementation outcomes included 571 Veterans referred to VA home- and community-based services and their family caregivers eligible for iHI-FIVES. Prior to iHI-FIVES launch, staff completed 65 surveys and 62 interviews. After the start of iHI-FIVES, staff completed 52 surveys and 38 interviews. Mixed methods evaluated reach and fidelity by arm.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fidelity was high overall with 88% of expected iHI-FIVES trainings delivered, and higher among REP only (non-CONNECT) compared with CONNECT sites (95% vs. 80%). Reach was 18% (average proportion of reach across eight sites) and higher among non-CONNECT compared with CONNECT sites (22% vs. 14%). Qualitative interviews revealed strong leadership support at high-reach sites. CONNECT did not influence self-reported team function.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A team collaboration strategy (CONNECT), added to REP, required more resources to implement iHI-FIVES than REP only and did not substantially enhance reach or fidelity. Leadership support was a key condition of implementation success and may be an important factor for improving iHI-FIVES reach with national expansion.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations on children's access to and utilization of health services 医疗补助责任医疗组织对儿童获得和利用医疗服务的影响。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14370
Joanne Constantin PhD, MPH, George L. Wehby PhD, MPH

Objective

To evaluate the effects of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) on children's access to and utilization of health services.

Study Setting and Design

This study employs difference-in-differences models comparing ACO and non-ACO states from 2018 through 2021. Access measures are indicators for preventive and sick care sources, unmet healthcare needs, and having a personal doctor or nurse. Utilization measures are preventive and dental care, mental healthcare, specialist visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

Secondary, de-identified data come from the 2016–2021 National Survey of Children's Health. The sample includes children with public insurance and ranges between 21,452 and 37,177 depending on the outcome.

Principal Findings

Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with an increase in children's likelihood of having a personal doctor or nurse by about 4 percentage-points concentrated among states that implemented ACOs in 2018. Medicaid ACOs were also associated with an increase in specialist care use and decline in emergency visits by about 5 percentage-points (the latter being concentrated among states that implemented ACOs in 2020). There were no discernable or robust associations with other pediatric outcomes.

Conclusions

There is mixed evidence on the associations of Medicaid ACOs with pediatric access and utilization outcomes. Examining effects over longer periods post-ACO implementation is important.

研究目的评估医疗补助责任医疗组织(ACO)对儿童获得和利用医疗服务的影响:本研究采用差异模型,对 2018 年至 2021 年的 ACO 州和非 ACO 州进行比较。获取措施包括预防和疾病护理来源、未满足的医疗保健需求以及拥有私人医生或护士等指标。利用措施包括预防和牙科保健、精神保健、专科就诊、急诊就诊和入院:二级、去标识化数据来自 2016-2021 年全国儿童健康调查。样本包括参加公共保险的儿童,根据结果的不同,样本数在 21,452 到 37,177 之间:医疗补助 ACO 的实施与儿童拥有私人医生或护士的可能性增加约 4 个百分点有关,主要集中在 2018 年实施 ACO 的州。医疗补助 ACO 还与专科护理使用率增加和急诊就诊率下降约 5 个百分点有关(后者主要集中在 2020 年实施 ACO 的各州)。与其他儿科结果没有明显或强有力的关联:关于医疗补助 ACO 与儿科就医和使用结果之间的关联,证据不一。对 ACO 实施后较长时期内的效果进行研究非常重要。
{"title":"Effects of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations on children's access to and utilization of health services","authors":"Joanne Constantin PhD, MPH,&nbsp;George L. Wehby PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14370","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-6773.14370","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the effects of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) on children's access to and utilization of health services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study employs difference-in-differences models comparing ACO and non-ACO states from 2018 through 2021. Access measures are indicators for preventive and sick care sources, unmet healthcare needs, and having a personal doctor or nurse. Utilization measures are preventive and dental care, mental healthcare, specialist visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Sources and Analytic Sample</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Secondary, de-identified data come from the 2016–2021 National Survey of Children's Health. The sample includes children with public insurance and ranges between 21,452 and 37,177 depending on the outcome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with an increase in children's likelihood of having a personal doctor or nurse by about 4 percentage-points concentrated among states that implemented ACOs in 2018. Medicaid ACOs were also associated with an increase in specialist care use and decline in emergency visits by about 5 percentage-points (the latter being concentrated among states that implemented ACOs in 2020). There were no discernable or robust associations with other pediatric outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is mixed evidence on the associations of Medicaid ACOs with pediatric access and utilization outcomes. Examining effects over longer periods post-ACO implementation is important.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14370","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health Services Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1