Alessio Nicosia, Costanza Di Stefano, Vincenzo Palmeri, Vito Ferro
Although several studies regarding flow resistance due to aquatic vegetation for small- and full-scale are available, the scaling of small-scale results to full-scale conditions still needs to be investigated. In this paper, a theoretical flow resistance equation for open channels was tested using literature measurements performed for full-scale field channels and small-scale experimental flumes with aquatic vegetation. At first, the relationship between the scale factor Γ of the velocity profile, the Froude number and the channel slope was calibrated by using 27 field measurements by Nikora et al. (2008). This relationship was also tested by 39 field experimental series by Okhravi et al. (2022). Then, the proposed relationship for estimating Γ was coupled with the theoretical flow resistance law to assess the performance in the estimate of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor values. The results demonstrated that the proposed approach gives a more accurate estimate of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor as compared to that obtained applying the literature relationships. The relationship between Γ, the Froude number and the channel slope obtained for the field condition was recalibrated by flume data changing only the scale coefficient. The analysis demonstrated that, for known hydraulic conditions (slope, Froude number), for scaling the Γ values estimated by field data (streams, rivers), ΓF, to values corresponding to laboratory conditions (flumes) ΓL, a scale factor of 0.5356 must be used. In conclusion, comparing the same hydraulic conditions, streams or rivers are characterized by friction factor values approximately twice those of a laboratory flume.
虽然有一些关于水生植被在小尺度和全尺寸条件下的流动阻力的研究,但将小尺度的结果缩放到全尺寸条件下仍然需要进行研究。本文对明渠的理论流动阻力方程进行了测试,采用文献测量方法对全尺寸的野外通道和有水生植被的小规模实验水槽进行了测试。首先,Nikora et al.(2008)利用27次现场测量,校准了流速剖面的比例因子Γ、弗劳德数和河道坡度之间的关系。Okhravi et al.(2022)也通过39个田间系列实验验证了这一关系。然后,将提出的Γ估计关系与理论流动阻力定律相结合,评估Darcy-Weisbach摩擦因数值的估计性能。结果表明,与应用文献关系获得的结果相比,所提出的方法给出了更准确的Darcy-Weisbach摩擦因子估计。通过仅改变尺度系数的水槽数据,重新标定了现场条件下Γ、弗劳德数与河道坡度之间的关系。分析表明,对于已知的水力条件(坡度,弗劳德数),为了将现场数据(溪流,河流)估算的Γ值ΓF缩放为实验室条件(水槽)ΓL对应的值,必须使用0.5356的比例因子。总之,比较相同的水力条件,溪流或河流的摩擦系数值大约是实验室水槽的两倍。
{"title":"Flow Resistance due to Aquatic Vegetation in Streams and Flumes","authors":"Alessio Nicosia, Costanza Di Stefano, Vincenzo Palmeri, Vito Ferro","doi":"10.1002/eco.70120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70120","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although several studies regarding flow resistance due to aquatic vegetation for small- and full-scale are available, the scaling of small-scale results to full-scale conditions still needs to be investigated. In this paper, a theoretical flow resistance equation for open channels was tested using literature measurements performed for full-scale field channels and small-scale experimental flumes with aquatic vegetation. At first, the relationship between the scale factor Γ of the velocity profile, the Froude number and the channel slope was calibrated by using 27 field measurements by Nikora et al. (2008). This relationship was also tested by 39 field experimental series by Okhravi et al. (2022). Then, the proposed relationship for estimating Γ was coupled with the theoretical flow resistance law to assess the performance in the estimate of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor values. The results demonstrated that the proposed approach gives a more accurate estimate of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor as compared to that obtained applying the literature relationships. The relationship between Γ, the Froude number and the channel slope obtained for the field condition was recalibrated by flume data changing only the scale coefficient. The analysis demonstrated that, for known hydraulic conditions (slope, Froude number), for scaling the Γ values estimated by field data (streams, rivers), Γ<sub>F</sub>, to values corresponding to laboratory conditions (flumes) Γ<sub>L</sub>, a scale factor of 0.5356 must be used. In conclusion, comparing the same hydraulic conditions, streams or rivers are characterized by friction factor values approximately twice those of a laboratory flume.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.70120","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145469478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}