首页 > 最新文献

Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care最新文献

英文 中文
The relative impact of labor induction versus improved labor management: Before and after the ARRIVE (a randomized trial of induction vs. expectant management) trial 引产与改善分娩管理的相对影响:ARRIVE(引产与待产管理随机试验)试验前后。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12845
Annette E. Fineberg MD, MPH, Kim Harley PhD, Maureen Lahiff PhD, Elliott K. Main MD

Objective

To evaluate the association of labor induction on cesarean delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes in low-risk, full-term patients in community hospitals during a period of concerted effort to safely prevent cesarean delivery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the California Maternal Data Center comprised linked discharge diagnoses and birth certificate data for all low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) individuals between 39 and 41 weeks from three Sacramento Valley community hospitals from 2016 to 2022 (N = 10,821) during a period of state-wide efforts to safely reduce cesarean rates. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) after labor induction in two time periods before and after the ARRIVE trial.

Results

During the study period, labor induction increased from 14.7% to 23.1%. Controlling for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, birthweight, maternal race and ethnicity, birthplace, English language, gestational age, Medicaid status, delivery year, and labor induction was associated with an increased aOR of 1.67 (95% CI 1.48–1.89) for cesarean delivery. We found a trend toward increased aOR of chorioamnionitis but no differences in blood transfusion, severe maternal morbidity, unexpected newborn complications, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal delivery, maternal lacerations, and shoulder dystocia with labor induction. A decrease aOR of cesarean delivery was observed comparing all births in 2019–2021 to 2016–2018.

Conclusion

Labor induction was associated with an increased aOR for cesarean delivery both before and after the ARRIVE trial. A decreased aOR for cesarean delivery was observed during the period of statewide efforts to safely reduce cesarean delivery both with and without labor induction.

目的在社区医院共同努力安全预防剖宫产期间,评估引产与剖宫产及其他孕产妇和新生儿结局的关系:我们利用加州孕产妇数据中心(California Maternal Data Center)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该数据中心由出院诊断和出生证明数据组成,涉及萨克拉门托河谷三家社区医院 2016 年至 2022 年(N = 10,821 例)在全州范围内努力安全降低剖宫产率期间所有 39 至 41 周的低风险、无胎盘、足月、单胎、顶点(NTSV)产妇。在 ARRIVE 试验前后两个时间段内,采用逻辑回归法计算引产后的几率比(ORs)和调整后的几率比(aORs):结果:在研究期间,引产率从 14.7% 上升到 23.1%。在控制产妇年龄、孕前体重指数、出生体重、产妇种族和民族、出生地、英语、胎龄、医疗补助状况、分娩年份的情况下,引产与剖宫产的 aOR 增加 1.67 (95% CI 1.48-1.89)有关。我们发现绒毛膜羊膜炎的 aOR 有增加的趋势,但在输血、产妇严重发病率、新生儿意外并发症、绒毛膜羊膜炎、阴道手术分娩、产妇撕裂伤和引产肩难产方面没有差异。将2019-2021年与2016-2018年的所有分娩进行比较,观察到剖宫产的aOR有所下降:引产与ARRIVE试验前后剖宫产的aOR增加有关。在全州努力安全减少剖宫产的期间,无论是否进行引产,都观察到剖宫产的 aOR 有所下降。
{"title":"The relative impact of labor induction versus improved labor management: Before and after the ARRIVE (a randomized trial of induction vs. expectant management) trial","authors":"Annette E. Fineberg MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kim Harley PhD,&nbsp;Maureen Lahiff PhD,&nbsp;Elliott K. Main MD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12845","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12845","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the association of labor induction on cesarean delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes in low-risk, full-term patients in community hospitals during a period of concerted effort to safely prevent cesarean delivery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the California Maternal Data Center comprised linked discharge diagnoses and birth certificate data for all low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) individuals between 39 and 41 weeks from three Sacramento Valley community hospitals from 2016 to 2022 (<i>N</i> = 10,821) during a period of state-wide efforts to safely reduce cesarean rates. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) after labor induction in two time periods before and after the ARRIVE trial.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>During the study period, labor induction increased from 14.7% to 23.1%. Controlling for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, birthweight, maternal race and ethnicity, birthplace, English language, gestational age, Medicaid status, delivery year, and labor induction was associated with an increased aOR of 1.67 (95% CI 1.48–1.89) for cesarean delivery. We found a trend toward increased aOR of chorioamnionitis but no differences in blood transfusion, severe maternal morbidity, unexpected newborn complications, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal delivery, maternal lacerations, and shoulder dystocia with labor induction. A decrease aOR of cesarean delivery was observed comparing all births in 2019–2021 to 2016–2018.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Labor induction was associated with an increased aOR for cesarean delivery both before and after the ARRIVE trial. A decreased aOR for cesarean delivery was observed during the period of statewide efforts to safely reduce cesarean delivery both with and without labor induction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"719-727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12845","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141321966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Separation at birth due to safeguarding concerns: Using reproductive justice theory to re-think the role of midwives. 出于安全考虑的分娩分离:利用生殖正义理论重新思考助产士的角色。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12842
Kaat De Backer, Hannah Rayment-Jones, Elsa Montgomery, Abigail Easter

Separation at birth due to safeguarding concerns is a deeply distressing and impactful event, with numbers rising across the world, and has devastating outcomes for birth mothers and their children. It is one of the most challenging aspects of contemporary midwifery practice in high-income countries, although rarely discussed and reflected on during pre- and post-registration midwifery training. Ethnic and racial disparities are prevalent both in child protection and maternity services and can be explained through an intersectional lens, accounting for biases based on race, gender, class, and societal beliefs around motherhood. With this paper, we aim to contribute to the growing body of critical midwifery studies and re-think the role of midwives in this context. Building on principles of reproductive justice theory, Intersectionality, and Standpoint Midwifery, we argue that midwives play a unique role when supporting women who go through child protection processes and should pursue a shift from passive bystander to active upstander to improve care for this group of mothers.

因保护问题而导致的产时分离是一种令人深感痛苦且影响深远的事件,其数量在全球范围内不断上升,对产妇及其子女造成了毁灭性的后果。在高收入国家,这是当代助产实践中最具挑战性的问题之一,尽管在助产士注册前后的培训中很少进行讨论和反思。族裔和种族差异在儿童保护和孕产服务中都很普遍,可以通过交叉视角来解释,说明基于种族、性别、阶级和社会对母亲身份的偏见。通过这篇论文,我们旨在为日益增多的批判性助产研究做出贡献,并重新思考助产士在这一背景下的作用。基于生殖正义理论、交叉性和立场助产的原则,我们认为助产士在为经历儿童保护程序的妇女提供支持时发挥着独特的作用,并应努力从被动的旁观者转变为积极的支持者,以改善对这一母亲群体的照顾。
{"title":"Separation at birth due to safeguarding concerns: Using reproductive justice theory to re-think the role of midwives.","authors":"Kaat De Backer, Hannah Rayment-Jones, Elsa Montgomery, Abigail Easter","doi":"10.1111/birt.12842","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12842","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Separation at birth due to safeguarding concerns is a deeply distressing and impactful event, with numbers rising across the world, and has devastating outcomes for birth mothers and their children. It is one of the most challenging aspects of contemporary midwifery practice in high-income countries, although rarely discussed and reflected on during pre- and post-registration midwifery training. Ethnic and racial disparities are prevalent both in child protection and maternity services and can be explained through an intersectional lens, accounting for biases based on race, gender, class, and societal beliefs around motherhood. With this paper, we aim to contribute to the growing body of critical midwifery studies and re-think the role of midwives in this context. Building on principles of reproductive justice theory, Intersectionality, and Standpoint Midwifery, we argue that midwives play a unique role when supporting women who go through child protection processes and should pursue a shift from passive bystander to active upstander to improve care for this group of mothers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I have to listen to them or they might harm me" and other narratives of why women endure obstetric violence in Bihar, India. "我必须听他们的话,否则他们可能会伤害我 "以及其他关于印度比哈尔邦妇女为何忍受产科暴力的叙述。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12828
Kaveri Mayra, Zoë Matthews, Jane Sandall, Sabu S Padmadas
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that obstetric violence has been prevalent globally and is finally getting some attention through research. This human rights violation takes several forms and is best understood through the narratives of embodied experiences of disrespect and abuse from women and other people who give birth, which is of utmost importance to make efforts in implementing respectful maternity care for a positive birthing experience. This study focused on the drivers of obstetric violence during labor and birth in Bihar, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participatory qualitative visual arts-based method of data collection-body mapping-assisted interviews (adapted as birth mapping)-was conducted to understand women's perception of why they are denied respectful maternity care and what makes them vulnerable to obstetric violence during labor and childbirth. This study is embedded in feminist and critical theories that ensure women's narratives are at the center, which was further ensured by the feminist relational discourse analysis. Eight women participated from urban slums and rural villages in Bihar, for 2-4 interactions each, within a week. The data included transcripts, audio files, body maps, birthing stories, and body key, which were analyzed with the help of NVivo 12.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Women's narratives suggested drivers that determine how they will be treated during labor and birth, or any form of sexual, reproductive, and maternal healthcare seeking presented through the four themes: (1) "I am admitted under your care, so, I will have to do what you say"-Influence of power on care during childbirth; (2) "I was blindfolded … because there were men"-Influence of gender on care during childbirth; (3) "The more money we give the more convenience we get"-Influence of structure on care during childbirth; and (4) "How could I ask him, how it will come out?"-Influence of culture on care during childbirth. How women will be treated in the society and in the obstetric environment is determined by their identity at the intersections of age, class, caste, marital status, religion, education, and many other sociodemographic factors. The issues related to each of these are intertwined and cross-cutting, which made it difficult to draw clear categorizations because the four themes influenced and overlapped with each other. Son preference, for example, is a gender-based issue that is part of certain cultures in a patriarchal structure as a result of power-based imbalance, which makes the women vulnerable to disrespect and abuse when their baby is assigned female at birth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Sensitive unique feminist methods are important to explore and understand women's embodied experiences of trauma and are essential to understand their perspectives of what drives obstetric violence during childbirth. Sensitive methods of research are crucial for the health systems to learn from and em
背景:有证据表明,产科暴力在全球范围内普遍存在,并终于通过研究得到了一些关注。这种侵犯人权的行为有多种形式,最好通过妇女和其他分娩者对不尊重和虐待经历的叙述来理解,这对于努力实施尊重产妇的护理以获得积极的分娩体验至关重要。本研究重点关注印度比哈尔邦分娩过程中的产科暴力驱动因素:方法:采用基于视觉艺术的参与式定性数据收集方法--身体映射辅助访谈(改编为分娩映射)--来了解妇女对她们为何得不到尊重的孕产护理的看法,以及是什么导致她们在分娩和生产过程中容易遭受产科暴力。这项研究以女权主义和批判理论为基础,确保妇女的叙述处于中心位置,而女权主义关系话语分析则进一步确保了这一点。来自比哈尔邦城市贫民窟和农村的八名妇女参与了此次研究,每人在一周内进行了 2-4 次互动。数据包括文字记录、音频文件、身体图、分娩故事和身体钥匙,并在 NVivo 12.Findings 的帮助下进行了分析:妇女的叙述提出了决定她们在分娩和生产过程中,或在寻求任何形式的性保健、生殖保健和孕产妇保健时如何对待她们的驱动因素,并通过四个主题呈现出来:(1) "我是在你的照顾下入院的,所以,我必须按你说的做"--权力对分娩护理的影响;(2) "我被蒙住了眼睛......因为那里有男人"--性别对分娩护理的影响;(3) "我们给的钱越多,我们得到的便利就越多"--结构对分娩护理的影响;以及 (4) "我怎么能问他,结果会怎样?"文化对分娩护理的影响。妇女在社会和产科环境中的待遇取决于她们在年龄、阶级、种姓、婚姻状况、宗教、教育和许多其他社会人口因素交织在一起的身份。与这些因素相关的问题相互交织、相互交叉,因此很难进行明确的分类,因为这四个主题相互影响、相互重叠。例如,"重男轻女 "是一个基于性别的问题,是父权制结构下某些文化的一部分,是权力失衡的结果,当婴儿出生时被分配为女性时,妇女很容易受到不尊重和虐待:敏感的、独特的女权主义研究方法对于探索和理解妇女的创伤体验非常重要,对于理解她们对分娩过程中产科暴力的驱动因素的看法也至关重要。敏感的研究方法对于医疗系统从妇女的意愿中汲取经验并将其融入医疗系统中、紧急应对这一结构性挑战以及确保妇女获得积极的护理体验至关重要。
{"title":"\"I have to listen to them or they might harm me\" and other narratives of why women endure obstetric violence in Bihar, India.","authors":"Kaveri Mayra, Zoë Matthews, Jane Sandall, Sabu S Padmadas","doi":"10.1111/birt.12828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12828","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Evidence suggests that obstetric violence has been prevalent globally and is finally getting some attention through research. This human rights violation takes several forms and is best understood through the narratives of embodied experiences of disrespect and abuse from women and other people who give birth, which is of utmost importance to make efforts in implementing respectful maternity care for a positive birthing experience. This study focused on the drivers of obstetric violence during labor and birth in Bihar, India.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Participatory qualitative visual arts-based method of data collection-body mapping-assisted interviews (adapted as birth mapping)-was conducted to understand women's perception of why they are denied respectful maternity care and what makes them vulnerable to obstetric violence during labor and childbirth. This study is embedded in feminist and critical theories that ensure women's narratives are at the center, which was further ensured by the feminist relational discourse analysis. Eight women participated from urban slums and rural villages in Bihar, for 2-4 interactions each, within a week. The data included transcripts, audio files, body maps, birthing stories, and body key, which were analyzed with the help of NVivo 12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Women's narratives suggested drivers that determine how they will be treated during labor and birth, or any form of sexual, reproductive, and maternal healthcare seeking presented through the four themes: (1) \"I am admitted under your care, so, I will have to do what you say\"-Influence of power on care during childbirth; (2) \"I was blindfolded … because there were men\"-Influence of gender on care during childbirth; (3) \"The more money we give the more convenience we get\"-Influence of structure on care during childbirth; and (4) \"How could I ask him, how it will come out?\"-Influence of culture on care during childbirth. How women will be treated in the society and in the obstetric environment is determined by their identity at the intersections of age, class, caste, marital status, religion, education, and many other sociodemographic factors. The issues related to each of these are intertwined and cross-cutting, which made it difficult to draw clear categorizations because the four themes influenced and overlapped with each other. Son preference, for example, is a gender-based issue that is part of certain cultures in a patriarchal structure as a result of power-based imbalance, which makes the women vulnerable to disrespect and abuse when their baby is assigned female at birth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;Sensitive unique feminist methods are important to explore and understand women's embodied experiences of trauma and are essential to understand their perspectives of what drives obstetric violence during childbirth. Sensitive methods of research are crucial for the health systems to learn from and em","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender-inclusive language in midwifery and perinatal services: A guide and argument for justice. 助产和围产服务中的性别包容性语言:正义的指南和论据。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12844
Sally Pezaro, John Pendleton, Rodante van der Waal, Sarah LaChance Adams, Mario J D S Santos, Ash Bainbridge, Krishna Istha, Zan Maeder, John Gilmore, Jeannine Webster, Bunty Lai-Boyd, Anne Marie Brennan, Elizabeth Newnham

Effective communication in relation to pregnancy and birth is crucial to quality care. A recent focus in reproductive healthcare on "sexed language" reflects an ideology of unchangeable sex binary and fear of erasure, from both cisgender women and the profession of midwifery. In this paper, we highlight how privileging sexed language causes harm to all who birth-including pregnant trans, gender diverse, and non-binary people-and is, therefore, unethical and incompatible with the principles of midwifery. We show how this argument, which conflates midwifery with essentialist thinking, is unstable, and perpetuates and misappropriates midwifery's marginalized status. We also explore how sex and gender essentialism can be understood as colonialist, heteropatriarchal, and universalist, and therefore, reinforcing of these harmful principles. Midwifery has both the opportunity and duty to uphold reproductive justice. Midwifery can be a leader in the decolonization of childbirth and in defending the rights of all childbearing people, the majority of whom are cisgender women. As the systemwide use of inclusive language is central to this commitment, we offer guidance in relation to how inclusive language in perinatal and midwifery services may be realized.

与怀孕和分娩有关的有效沟通对于优质护理至关重要。最近,生殖保健领域对 "性别语言 "的关注反映了一种不可改变的二元性别意识形态,也反映了顺性别女性和助产士行业对被抹杀的恐惧。在本文中,我们强调了性别语言的特权是如何对所有生育者造成伤害的--包括怀孕的变性人、不同性别者和非二元性别者--因此是不道德的,也不符合助产士的原则。我们展示了这种将助产与本质主义思维混为一谈的论点是如何不稳定,以及如何延续和滥用助产的边缘化地位。我们还探讨了性和性别本质论如何被理解为殖民主义、异父权制和普遍主义,从而强化了这些有害的原则。助产士既有机会也有责任维护生殖正义。助产士可以成为分娩非殖民化和捍卫所有生育者(其中大多数是顺性别妇女)权利的领导者。由于在全系统使用包容性语言是这一承诺的核心,我们就如何在围产期和助产服务中实现包容性语言提供指导。
{"title":"Gender-inclusive language in midwifery and perinatal services: A guide and argument for justice.","authors":"Sally Pezaro, John Pendleton, Rodante van der Waal, Sarah LaChance Adams, Mario J D S Santos, Ash Bainbridge, Krishna Istha, Zan Maeder, John Gilmore, Jeannine Webster, Bunty Lai-Boyd, Anne Marie Brennan, Elizabeth Newnham","doi":"10.1111/birt.12844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective communication in relation to pregnancy and birth is crucial to quality care. A recent focus in reproductive healthcare on \"sexed language\" reflects an ideology of unchangeable sex binary and fear of erasure, from both cisgender women and the profession of midwifery. In this paper, we highlight how privileging sexed language causes harm to all who birth-including pregnant trans, gender diverse, and non-binary people-and is, therefore, unethical and incompatible with the principles of midwifery. We show how this argument, which conflates midwifery with essentialist thinking, is unstable, and perpetuates and misappropriates midwifery's marginalized status. We also explore how sex and gender essentialism can be understood as colonialist, heteropatriarchal, and universalist, and therefore, reinforcing of these harmful principles. Midwifery has both the opportunity and duty to uphold reproductive justice. Midwifery can be a leader in the decolonization of childbirth and in defending the rights of all childbearing people, the majority of whom are cisgender women. As the systemwide use of inclusive language is central to this commitment, we offer guidance in relation to how inclusive language in perinatal and midwifery services may be realized.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141187234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum screening results in Ontario, Canada: The healthy babies healthy children screening tool COVID-19 大流行对加拿大安大略省产后筛查结果的影响:健康婴儿健康儿童筛查工具。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12835
Ye (Hailey) Jin, Daniel J. Corsi, Nicole F. Roberts, Ann E. Sprague, Marco Solmi, Gayatri Saraf, Jasmine Gandhi, Ian Colman, Mark C. Walker, Jess G. Fiedorowicz

Background

Research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mothers/childbearing parents has mainly been cross-sectional and focused on psychological symptoms. This study examined the impact on function using ongoing, systematic screening of a representative Ontario sample.

Methods

An interrupted time series analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from a province-wide screening program using the Healthy Babies Healthy Children (HBHC) tool assessed changes associated with the pandemic at the time of postpartum discharge from hospital. Postal codes were used to link to neighborhood-level data. The ability to parent or care for the baby/child and other psychosocial and behavioral outcomes were assessed.

Results

The co-primary outcomes of inability to parent or care for the baby/child were infrequently observed in the pre-pandemic (March 9, 2019–March 15, 2020) and initial pandemic periods (March 16, 2020–March 23, 2021) (parent 209/63,006 (0.33%)–177/56,117 (0.32%), care 537/62,955 (0.85%)–324/56,086 (0.58%)). Changes after pandemic onset were not observed for either outcome although a significant (p = 0.02) increase in slope was observed for inability to parent (with questionable clinical significance). For secondary outcomes, worsening was only seen for reported complications during labor/delivery. Significant improvements were observed in the likelihood of being unable to identify a support person to assist with care, need of newcomer support, and concerns about money over time.

Conclusions

There were no substantive changes in concerns about ability to parent or care for children. Adverse impacts of the pandemic may have been mitigated by accommodations for remote work and social safety net policies.

背景:有关 COVID-19 大流行对母亲/育龄父母影响的研究主要是横断面研究,侧重于心理症状。本研究通过对安大略省代表性样本进行持续、系统的筛查,研究其对功能的影响:方法:使用健康婴儿健康儿童(HBHC)工具对来自全省筛查计划的重复横截面数据进行间断时间序列分析,评估产后出院时与大流行相关的变化。邮政编码被用来与邻里层面的数据进行链接。结果显示,无法养育或照顾婴儿/儿童的能力以及其他社会心理和行为结果均得到了评估:在大流行前(2019 年 3 月 9 日至 2020 年 3 月 15 日)和大流行初期(2020 年 3 月 16 日至 2021 年 3 月 23 日),无法养育或照顾婴儿/儿童的共同主要结果并不常见(养育 209/63,006 (0.33%)-177/56,117 (0.32%),照顾 537/62,955 (0.85%)-324/56,086 (0.58%))。大流行开始后,虽然无法养育子女的斜率显著增加(p = 0.02)(临床意义值得怀疑),但未观察到任何一项结果发生变化。在次要结果中,只有在报告的分娩并发症方面出现了恶化。随着时间的推移,在无法找到支持者协助护理、需要新来者支持和对金钱的担忧方面,观察到了显著的改善:结论:对养育或照顾子女能力的担忧没有实质性变化。对远程工作和社会安全网政策的照顾可能减轻了大流行病的不利影响。
{"title":"Changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum screening results in Ontario, Canada: The healthy babies healthy children screening tool","authors":"Ye (Hailey) Jin,&nbsp;Daniel J. Corsi,&nbsp;Nicole F. Roberts,&nbsp;Ann E. Sprague,&nbsp;Marco Solmi,&nbsp;Gayatri Saraf,&nbsp;Jasmine Gandhi,&nbsp;Ian Colman,&nbsp;Mark C. Walker,&nbsp;Jess G. Fiedorowicz","doi":"10.1111/birt.12835","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12835","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mothers/childbearing parents has mainly been cross-sectional and focused on psychological symptoms. This study examined the impact on function using ongoing, systematic screening of a representative Ontario sample.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An interrupted time series analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from a province-wide screening program using the Healthy Babies Healthy Children (HBHC) tool assessed changes associated with the pandemic at the time of postpartum discharge from hospital. Postal codes were used to link to neighborhood-level data. The ability to parent or care for the baby/child and other psychosocial and behavioral outcomes were assessed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The co-primary outcomes of inability to parent or care for the baby/child were infrequently observed in the pre-pandemic (March 9, 2019–March 15, 2020) and initial pandemic periods (March 16, 2020–March 23, 2021) (parent 209/63,006 (0.33%)–177/56,117 (0.32%), care 537/62,955 (0.85%)–324/56,086 (0.58%)). Changes after pandemic onset were not observed for either outcome although a significant (<i>p</i> = 0.02) increase in slope was observed for inability to parent (with questionable clinical significance). For secondary outcomes, worsening was only seen for reported complications during labor/delivery. Significant improvements were observed in the likelihood of being unable to identify a support person to assist with care, need of newcomer support, and concerns about money over time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There were no substantive changes in concerns about ability to parent or care for children. Adverse impacts of the pandemic may have been mitigated by accommodations for remote work and social safety net policies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"762-772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12835","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141181462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital health's influence on the association between birth preference and vaginal birth 数字健康对生育偏好与阴道分娩之间关联的影响。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12831
Alison K. Brinson MSPH, PhD, Hannah R. Jahnke PhD, Lily Rubin-Miller MPH, Natalie Henrich MPH, PhD, Alex Peahl MSc, MD, Neel Shah MPP, MD, Christa Moss PhD

Background

Women's preferred mode of birth during pregnancy is predictive of their actual mode of birth. Digital prenatal care services are a promising method for educating women on mode of birth to reduce elective cesareans. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of digital health on the association between birth preference and mode of birth.

Methods

Data come from 5409 pregnant women enrolled in a digital platform for women's and family health. Multi-trajectory modeling identified trajectories of digital health usage throughout pregnancy. Adjusted logistic regression models tested associations between birth preferences and mode of birth. The modifying effect of digital health usage on the association between birth preference and mode of birth was assessed on the multiplicative scale.

Results

Four distinct trajectories of digital service usage were identified and labeled as: (1) baseline users (52%): the reference group; (2) just-in timers (16%): high usage during the third trimester; (3) learners (26%): high educational resource usage (e.g., articles and classes) throughout pregnancy; and (4) super users (6%): high usage of both education and care resources throughout pregnancy. Overall, preferred mode of birth at enrollment was predictive of actual mode of birth; however, digital health usage moderated this association, whereby super users and learners who preferred a cesarean at enrollment were more likely to deliver vaginally, compared to baseline users who preferred a cesarean.

Conclusion

For the increasing proportion of women considering an elective cesarean, education through a prenatal digital health platform may help to encourage vaginal birth and reduce cesarean births.

背景:妇女在怀孕期间首选的分娩方式可预测其实际分娩方式。数字化产前保健服务是一种很有前景的方法,可用于教育妇女选择分娩方式,从而减少选择性剖宫产。本研究旨在评估数字化医疗对分娩偏好与分娩方式之间关联的影响:数据来源于5409名注册妇女和家庭健康数字平台的孕妇。多轨迹建模确定了整个孕期使用数字健康的轨迹。调整后的逻辑回归模型检验了分娩偏好与分娩方式之间的关联。在乘法量表上评估了数字健康使用对生育偏好和生育方式之间关联的调节作用:确定了四种不同的数字服务使用轨迹,并将其标记为(1) 基准用户(52%):参照组;(2) 准时用户(16%):怀孕三个月期间使用率高;(3) 学习者(26%):整个孕期教育资源使用率高(如文章和课程);(4) 超级用户(6%):整个孕期教育和护理资源使用率高。总体而言,注册时首选的分娩方式对实际分娩方式具有预测作用;然而,数字医疗的使用调节了这种关联,与首选剖宫产的基线用户相比,注册时首选剖宫产的超级用户和学习者更有可能经阴道分娩:对于越来越多考虑选择剖宫产的妇女来说,通过产前数字健康平台进行教育可能有助于鼓励阴道分娩,减少剖宫产。
{"title":"Digital health's influence on the association between birth preference and vaginal birth","authors":"Alison K. Brinson MSPH, PhD,&nbsp;Hannah R. Jahnke PhD,&nbsp;Lily Rubin-Miller MPH,&nbsp;Natalie Henrich MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Alex Peahl MSc, MD,&nbsp;Neel Shah MPP, MD,&nbsp;Christa Moss PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12831","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12831","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Women's preferred mode of birth during pregnancy is predictive of their actual mode of birth. Digital prenatal care services are a promising method for educating women on mode of birth to reduce elective cesareans. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of digital health on the association between birth preference and mode of birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data come from 5409 pregnant women enrolled in a digital platform for women's and family health. Multi-trajectory modeling identified trajectories of digital health usage throughout pregnancy. Adjusted logistic regression models tested associations between birth preferences and mode of birth. The modifying effect of digital health usage on the association between birth preference and mode of birth was assessed on the multiplicative scale.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four distinct trajectories of digital service usage were identified and labeled as: (1) baseline users (52%): the reference group; (2) just-in timers (16%): high usage during the third trimester; (3) learners (26%): high educational resource usage (e.g., articles and classes) throughout pregnancy; and (4) super users (6%): high usage of both education and care resources throughout pregnancy. Overall, preferred mode of birth at enrollment was predictive of actual mode of birth; however, digital health usage moderated this association, whereby super users and learners who preferred a cesarean at enrollment were more likely to deliver vaginally, compared to baseline users who preferred a cesarean.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For the increasing proportion of women considering an elective cesarean, education through a prenatal digital health platform may help to encourage vaginal birth and reduce cesarean births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"752-761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An exploratory review on the empirical evaluation of the quality of reporting and analyzing labor duration 关于报告和分析劳动时间质量的实证评估的探索性综述。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12833
Emilienne Celetta MSc, Loukia M. Spineli PhD, Valérie Avignon MSc, Hanna Gehling MSc, Mechthild M. Gross PhD

Introduction

This exploratory review aimed to provide empirical evidence on the definitions of labor, the statistical approaches and measures reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies measuring the duration of labor.

Methods

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using different databases. An extraction form was designed and used to extract relevant data. English, French, and German studies published between 1999 and 2019 have been included. Only RCTs and observational studies analyzing labor duration (or a phase of labor duration) as a primary outcome have been included.

Results

Ninety-two RCTs and 126 observational studies were eligible. No definition of the onset of labor was provided in 21.7% (n = 20) of the RCTs and 23.8% (n = 30) of the observational studies. Mean was the most frequently applied measure of labor duration in the RCTs (89.1%, n = 82), and median in the observational studies (54.8%, n = 69). Most RCTs (83%, n = 76) and observational studies (70.6%, n = 89) analyzed labor duration using a bivariate method, with the t-test being the most frequently applied (45.7% and 27%, respectively). Only 10.8% (n = 10) of the RCTs and 52.4% (n = 66) of the observational studies conducted a multivariable regression: 3 (30%; out of 10) RCTs and 37 (56%; out of 66) observational studies used a time-to-event adapted model.

Conclusion

This survey reports a lack of agreement with respect to how the onset of labor and phases of labor duration are presented. Concerning the statistical approaches, few studies used survival analysis, which is the appropriate statistical framework to analyze time-to-event data.

引言本探索性综述旨在就分娩的定义、统计方法以及随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究中报告的测量分娩持续时间的方法提供实证证据:方法:使用不同的数据库进行了系统的电子文献检索。方法:使用不同的数据库进行了系统的电子文献检索,并设计了一份提取表,用于提取相关数据。纳入了 1999 年至 2019 年间发表的英文、法文和德文研究。仅纳入了将产程(或产程的某一阶段)作为主要结果进行分析的研究性临床试验和观察性研究:有 92 项研究性临床试验和 126 项观察性研究符合条件。21.7%的研究性试验(n = 20)和23.8%的观察性研究(n = 30)没有提供分娩开始的定义。在研究性试验(89.1%,n = 82)和观察性研究(54.8%,n = 69)中,平均值是最常用的产程衡量标准。大多数研究性试验(83%,n = 76)和观察性研究(70.6%,n = 89)使用二变量法分析产程,其中最常用的是 t 检验(分别为 45.7% 和 27%)。只有 10.8%(n = 10)的研究性试验和 52.4%(n = 66)的观察性研究进行了多变量回归:3 项研究性试验(30%;共 10 项)和 37 项观察性研究(56%;共 66 项)使用了时间到事件适应模型:本次调查报告显示,在如何表述分娩开始时间和分娩持续时间阶段方面缺乏一致意见。关于统计方法,很少有研究使用生存分析,而生存分析是分析时间到事件数据的合适统计框架。
{"title":"An exploratory review on the empirical evaluation of the quality of reporting and analyzing labor duration","authors":"Emilienne Celetta MSc,&nbsp;Loukia M. Spineli PhD,&nbsp;Valérie Avignon MSc,&nbsp;Hanna Gehling MSc,&nbsp;Mechthild M. Gross PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12833","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12833","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This exploratory review aimed to provide empirical evidence on the definitions of labor, the statistical approaches and measures reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies measuring the duration of labor.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using different databases. An extraction form was designed and used to extract relevant data. English, French, and German studies published between 1999 and 2019 have been included. Only RCTs and observational studies analyzing labor duration (or a phase of labor duration) as a primary outcome have been included.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ninety-two RCTs and 126 observational studies were eligible. No definition of the onset of labor was provided in 21.7% (<i>n</i> = 20) of the RCTs and 23.8% (<i>n</i> = 30) of the observational studies. Mean was the most frequently applied measure of labor duration in the RCTs (89.1%, <i>n</i> = 82), and median in the observational studies (54.8%, <i>n</i> = 69). Most RCTs (83%, <i>n</i> = 76) and observational studies (70.6%, <i>n</i> = 89) analyzed labor duration using a bivariate method, with the <i>t</i>-test being the most frequently applied (45.7% and 27%, respectively). Only 10.8% (<i>n</i> = 10) of the RCTs and 52.4% (<i>n</i> = 66) of the observational studies conducted a multivariable regression: 3 (30%; out of 10) RCTs and 37 (56%; out of 66) observational studies used a time-to-event adapted model.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This survey reports a lack of agreement with respect to how the onset of labor and phases of labor duration are presented. Concerning the statistical approaches, few studies used survival analysis, which is the appropriate statistical framework to analyze time-to-event data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"773-782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of birthing people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of comments from the 2020 Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) COVID-19 大流行期间分娩者的经历:分析来自 2020 年威斯康星州妊娠风险评估监测系统 (PRAMS) 的意见。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12836
Trina C. Salm Ward PhD, MSW, Tuleen Abu Zahra BSN, RN, Chuthamas Payjapoh RN, BSN, MSN, Tinuola Oladebo MSP

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a significant toll on the US population, with birthing people having special clinical needs. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is a population-based surveillance system for monitoring birthing people's experiences. Comment data from the PRAMS survey can provide further insight into birthing people's experiences. This study aims to use PRAMS data to describe pandemic-related experiences in a representative sample of birthing people in Wisconsin to help inform future emergency preparedness planning.

Methods

This study analyzed 2020 Wisconsin PRAMS data for births in March or later. Content analysis of pandemic-related comment data was conducted, and quantitative data on demographic characteristics and pandemic-related experiences were examined.

Results

Findings from 1406 respondents indicated that many birthing people were affected by the pandemic, including changes in healthcare visits and employment. One hundred respondents commented on pandemic-related experiences; four interrelated themes emerged from content analysis: changed nature and quality of healthcare, limited social support, increased anxiety, stress, or fear, and employment or financial burden. Most comments discussed negative impacts; some expressed positive aspects.

Discussion

Findings suggest opportunities for improving support for birthing people during public health emergencies, for example, through developing healthcare policies and public health guidelines that prioritize the protective mechanisms of social support for birthing people, identifying additional and immediately accessible policy protections to support birthing and postpartum people (e.g., insurance and paid leave) during public health emergencies, and implementing additional screening and support to help address increased mental health needs during public health emergencies.

背景:COVID-19 大流行给美国人口造成了巨大损失,其中分娩人群有特殊的临床需求。妊娠风险评估监测系统 (PRAMS) 是一个基于人群的监测系统,用于监测分娩者的经历。来自 PRAMS 调查的评论数据可以让人们进一步了解分娩者的经历。本研究旨在使用 PRAMS 数据来描述威斯康星州具有代表性的分娩者样本中与流行病相关的经历,以帮助为未来的应急准备规划提供信息:本研究分析了 2020 年威斯康星州 PRAMS 数据中 3 月或 3 月以后出生的婴儿。对大流行病相关评论数据进行了内容分析,并对人口特征和大流行病相关经历的定量数据进行了研究:来自 1406 名受访者的调查结果显示,许多分娩者受到了大流行病的影响,包括就医和就业方面的变化。100 名受访者就与大流行病相关的经历发表了评论;内容分析得出了四个相互关联的主题:医疗保健的性质和质量发生变化;社会支持有限;焦虑、压力或恐惧增加;以及就业或经济负担。大多数评论都讨论了负面影响,也有一些评论表达了积极的方面:讨论:研究结果表明,在公共卫生突发事件期间,有机会改善对分娩者的支持,例如,通过制定医疗保健政策和公共卫生指南,优先考虑对分娩者的社会支持保护机制,确定更多可立即获得的政策保护,以在公共卫生突发事件期间支持分娩者和产后妇女(例如,保险和带薪休假),以及实施额外的筛查和支持,以帮助解决公共卫生突发事件期间增加的心理健康需求。
{"title":"Experiences of birthing people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of comments from the 2020 Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)","authors":"Trina C. Salm Ward PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Tuleen Abu Zahra BSN, RN,&nbsp;Chuthamas Payjapoh RN, BSN, MSN,&nbsp;Tinuola Oladebo MSP","doi":"10.1111/birt.12836","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12836","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a significant toll on the US population, with birthing people having special clinical needs. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is a population-based surveillance system for monitoring birthing people's experiences. Comment data from the PRAMS survey can provide further insight into birthing people's experiences. This study aims to use PRAMS data to describe pandemic-related experiences in a representative sample of birthing people in Wisconsin to help inform future emergency preparedness planning.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study analyzed 2020 Wisconsin PRAMS data for births in March or later. Content analysis of pandemic-related comment data was conducted, and quantitative data on demographic characteristics and pandemic-related experiences were examined.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Findings from 1406 respondents indicated that many birthing people were affected by the pandemic, including changes in healthcare visits and employment. One hundred respondents commented on pandemic-related experiences; four interrelated themes emerged from content analysis: <i>changed nature and quality of healthcare</i>, <i>limited social support</i>, <i>increased anxiety, stress, or fear</i>, and <i>employment or financial burden</i>. Most comments discussed negative impacts; some expressed positive aspects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Findings suggest opportunities for improving support for birthing people during public health emergencies, for example, through developing healthcare policies and public health guidelines that prioritize the protective mechanisms of social support for birthing people, identifying additional and immediately accessible policy protections to support birthing and postpartum people (e.g., insurance and paid leave) during public health emergencies, and implementing additional screening and support to help address increased mental health needs during public health emergencies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"738-751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physiological plateaus during normal labor and birth: A novel definition. 正常分娩和生产过程中的生理高原:新定义
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12843
Marina Weckend, Kylie McCullough, Christine Duffield, Sara Bayes, Clare Davison

Background: Diagnoses of labor dystocia, and subsequent labor augmentation, make one of the biggest contributions to childbirth medicalization, which remains a key challenge in contemporary maternity care. However, labor dystocia is poorly defined, and the antithetical concept of physiological plateaus remains insufficiently explored.

Aim: To generate a definition of physiological plateaus as a basis for further research.

Methods: This qualitative study applied grounded theory methods and comprised interviews with 20 midwives across Australia, conducted between September 2020 and February 2022. Data were coded in a three-phase approach, starting with inductive line-by-line coding, which generated themes and subthemes, and finally, through axial coding.

Results: Physiological plateaus represent a temporary slowing of one or multiple labor processes and appear to be common during childbirth. They are reported throughout the entire continuum of labor, typically lasting between a few minutes to several hours. Their etiology/function appears to be a self-regulatory mechanism of the mother-infant dyad. Physiological plateaus typically self-resolve and are followed by a self-resumption of labor. Women with physiological plateaus during labor appear to experience positive birth outcomes.

Discussion: Despite appearing to be common, physiological plateaus are insufficiently recognized in contemporary childbirth discourse. Consequently, there seems to be a significant risk of misinterpretation of physiological plateaus as labor dystocia. While findings are limited by the qualitative design and require validation through further quantitative research, the proposed novel definition provides an important starting point for further investigation.

Conclusion: A better understanding of physiological plateaus holds the potential for a de-medicalization of childbirth through preventing unjustified labor augmentation.

背景:分娩难产的诊断以及随后的助产手术是分娩医疗化的最大贡献之一,而分娩医疗化仍是当代孕产妇护理面临的主要挑战。然而,分娩难产的定义并不明确,而与之对立的生理高原概念仍未得到充分探讨。目的:提出生理高原的定义,作为进一步研究的基础:这项定性研究采用了基础理论方法,在 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月期间对澳大利亚的 20 名助产士进行了访谈。采用三阶段法对数据进行编码,首先是逐行归纳编码,产生主题和次主题,最后是轴向编码:生理高原代表一种或多种分娩过程的暂时减慢,在分娩过程中似乎很常见。在整个分娩过程中都会出现,通常持续几分钟到几小时不等。其病因/功能似乎是母婴二人的一种自我调节机制。生理高原通常会自行消退,随后会自行恢复分娩。在分娩过程中出现生理高原的妇女似乎会获得积极的分娩结果:讨论:尽管生理高原似乎很常见,但在当代分娩论述中却没有得到充分认识。因此,将生理高原误解为分娩难产的风险似乎很大。虽然研究结果受到定性设计的限制,需要通过进一步的定量研究来验证,但提出的新定义为进一步研究提供了一个重要的起点:更好地理解生理高原有可能通过防止不合理的扩产实现分娩的去医疗化。
{"title":"Physiological plateaus during normal labor and birth: A novel definition.","authors":"Marina Weckend, Kylie McCullough, Christine Duffield, Sara Bayes, Clare Davison","doi":"10.1111/birt.12843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12843","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnoses of labor dystocia, and subsequent labor augmentation, make one of the biggest contributions to childbirth medicalization, which remains a key challenge in contemporary maternity care. However, labor dystocia is poorly defined, and the antithetical concept of physiological plateaus remains insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To generate a definition of physiological plateaus as a basis for further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study applied grounded theory methods and comprised interviews with 20 midwives across Australia, conducted between September 2020 and February 2022. Data were coded in a three-phase approach, starting with inductive line-by-line coding, which generated themes and subthemes, and finally, through axial coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physiological plateaus represent a temporary slowing of one or multiple labor processes and appear to be common during childbirth. They are reported throughout the entire continuum of labor, typically lasting between a few minutes to several hours. Their etiology/function appears to be a self-regulatory mechanism of the mother-infant dyad. Physiological plateaus typically self-resolve and are followed by a self-resumption of labor. Women with physiological plateaus during labor appear to experience positive birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite appearing to be common, physiological plateaus are insufficiently recognized in contemporary childbirth discourse. Consequently, there seems to be a significant risk of misinterpretation of physiological plateaus as labor dystocia. While findings are limited by the qualitative design and require validation through further quantitative research, the proposed novel definition provides an important starting point for further investigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A better understanding of physiological plateaus holds the potential for a de-medicalization of childbirth through preventing unjustified labor augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parent-identified gaps in preparation for the postpartum period in the United States: An integrative review 美国父母在产后准备工作中发现的差距:综合回顾。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12832
Danielle N. Nazarenko MSN, CNM, IBCLC, Ariel L. Daniel MSN, RN, FNP-BC, Stephanie Durfee MSNed, RNC, C-EFM, Kafuli Agbemenu PhD, MPH, RN, CTN-A

Background

In the United States, 35% of all pregnancy-related deaths occur between 24 h and 6 weeks after delivery, yet the first outpatient visit is not typically scheduled until 6 weeks postpartum. Thus, the ability to independently navigate this period is critical to maternal well-being and safety. However, previous research suggests that many women feel unprepared to manage the challenges they encounter during this time, and there is a current need to synthesize the existing evidence. Therefore, the purpose of this integrative review is to describe parent-identified gaps in preparation for the postpartum period in the United States.

Methods

Using the Integrative Review framework by Whittemore and Knafl, a systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science, and a hand-search was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 1995 and 2023. Results were reported according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies that met eligibility criteria were synthesized in a literature matrix.

Results

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Four themes were identified: Mental Health Concerns, Physical Concerns, Infant Feeding and Care Concerns, and General Concerns and Recommendations. Many women, regardless of parity, reported feeling unprepared for numerous postpartum experiences, including depression, anxiety, physical recovery, breastfeeding, and infant care. Parents reported difficulty differentiating normal postpartum symptoms from complications. Hospital discharge teaching was viewed as simultaneously overwhelming and inadequate. Parent recommendations included the need for earlier and more comprehensive postpartum preparation during pregnancy, delivered in multiple formats and settings. Parents also reported the need for earlier postpartum visits and improved outpatient support.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that many parents in the United States feel unprepared to navigate a wide variety of emotional, physical, breastfeeding, and infant-care experiences. Future research should explore innovative educational approaches to postpartum preparation during pregnancy as well as outpatient programs to bridge the current gaps in postpartum care.

背景:在美国,35% 与妊娠有关的死亡发生在产后 24 小时至 6 周之间,但首次门诊通常要到产后 6 周才安排。因此,能否独立度过这一时期对产妇的福祉和安全至关重要。然而,以往的研究表明,许多产妇在应对这一时期遇到的挑战时感到毫无准备,因此目前需要对现有证据进行综合。因此,本综合综述旨在描述美国父母在产后准备方面所发现的差距:方法:采用 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的综合综述框架,对 Medline、CINAHL、PsychInfo、Web of Science 进行了系统检索,并对 1995 年至 2023 年间发表的同行评审英文文章进行了手工检索。结果按照 PRISMA 2020 指南进行报告。符合资格标准的研究在文献矩阵中进行了综合:结果:22 项研究符合纳入标准。确定了四个主题:心理健康关注点、身体关注点、婴儿喂养和护理关注点以及一般关注点和建议。许多妇女,无论其准妈妈身份如何,都表示对许多产后经历感到毫无准备,包括抑郁、焦虑、身体恢复、母乳喂养和婴儿护理。父母们表示很难区分正常的产后症状和并发症。他们认为出院指导既令人不知所措,又不够充分。家长们的建议包括需要在怀孕期间更早、更全面地做好产后准备,并以多种形式和环境提供。家长们还表示需要更早地进行产后访视并改善门诊支持:我们的研究结果表明,在美国,许多父母在面对情感、身体、母乳喂养和婴儿护理等各种经历时感到毫无准备。未来的研究应探索创新的孕期产后准备教育方法以及门诊计划,以弥补目前产后护理方面的不足。
{"title":"Parent-identified gaps in preparation for the postpartum period in the United States: An integrative review","authors":"Danielle N. Nazarenko MSN, CNM, IBCLC,&nbsp;Ariel L. Daniel MSN, RN, FNP-BC,&nbsp;Stephanie Durfee MSNed, RNC, C-EFM,&nbsp;Kafuli Agbemenu PhD, MPH, RN, CTN-A","doi":"10.1111/birt.12832","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12832","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the United States, 35% of all pregnancy-related deaths occur between 24 h and 6 weeks after delivery, yet the first outpatient visit is not typically scheduled until 6 weeks postpartum. Thus, the ability to independently navigate this period is critical to maternal well-being and safety. However, previous research suggests that many women feel unprepared to manage the challenges they encounter during this time, and there is a current need to synthesize the existing evidence. Therefore, the purpose of this integrative review is to describe parent-identified gaps in preparation for the postpartum period in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using the Integrative Review framework by Whittemore and Knafl, a systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science, and a hand-search was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 1995 and 2023. Results were reported according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies that met eligibility criteria were synthesized in a literature matrix.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Four themes were identified: Mental Health Concerns, Physical Concerns, Infant Feeding and Care Concerns, and General Concerns and Recommendations. Many women, regardless of parity, reported feeling unprepared for numerous postpartum experiences, including depression, anxiety, physical recovery, breastfeeding, and infant care. Parents reported difficulty differentiating normal postpartum symptoms from complications. Hospital discharge teaching was viewed as simultaneously overwhelming and inadequate. Parent recommendations included the need for earlier and more comprehensive postpartum preparation during pregnancy, delivered in multiple formats and settings. Parents also reported the need for earlier postpartum visits and improved outpatient support.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings indicate that many parents in the United States feel unprepared to navigate a wide variety of emotional, physical, breastfeeding, and infant-care experiences. Future research should explore innovative educational approaches to postpartum preparation during pregnancy as well as outpatient programs to bridge the current gaps in postpartum care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"669-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1