首页 > 最新文献

Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care最新文献

英文 中文
Adopting Early Essential Newborn Care (EENC) in the Delivery Room: An Implementation Study From China 产房早期新生儿基本护理(EENC)的实施研究
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-08-24 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70009
Min Yang, Caiyun Wang, Linlin Cao, Xiu Zhu, Jie Lu

Background

Early Essential Newborn Care (EENC) is a highly beneficial and cost-effective set of evidence-based interventions for newborns and their mothers. However, the implementation of EENC as part of routine clinical practice in the delivery room has not yet been achieved in China. The purpose of this study was to describe the adoption of EENC in general hospitals in China and to evaluate its implementation impacts.

Methods

This study was an implementation study. The design of the implementation process was guided by a Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the conceptual model of implementation research. Mixed methods were used to evaluate the implementation of EENC with qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, including implementation outcomes, service outcomes, and patient outcomes.

Results

A total of 279 patients and 25 nurse-midwives were evaluated in this study. Both the implementation and service outcomes in this study were satisfactory. Obstacles were reported in the acceptability, feasibility, adoption, and fidelity of EENC, such as the acceptance of evidence by nurse-midwives, the support of managers to implement EENC in staff under their management, and the allocation of adequate resources. For patient outcomes, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization (27.1% vs. 39.6%, p < 0.05) and early initiation of breastfeeding (51.4% vs. 64.0%, p < 0.05) improved after EENC was implemented. Furthermore, the amount of vaginal bleeding after 2 h by subjects in the EENC implementation group [(283.92 ± 71.31 mL) vs. (308.78 ± 84.42 mL), t = 2.694, p < 0.05] was also significantly reduced.

Conclusion

EENC can be effectively implemented in general hospitals, but some factors affecting the implementation of EENC included the acceptance of evidence by nurse-midwives, support from managers, and resource allocation. The implementation of EENC was found to be beneficial to newborns and their mothers. Our findings indicate that EENC should be incorporated as part of routine maternity care and nursing practice.

背景:早期基本新生儿护理(EENC)是一套对新生儿及其母亲非常有益且具有成本效益的循证干预措施。然而,将EENC作为产房常规临床实践的一部分在中国尚未实现。本研究的目的是描述中国综合医院采用EENC的情况,并评估其实施效果。方法:本研究为实施性研究。实施过程的设计以知识-行动框架和实施研究的概念模型为指导。通过定性和定量数据收集方法,采用混合方法评估EENC的实施情况,包括实施结果、服务结果和患者结果。结果:本研究共对279名患者和25名护理助产士进行了评估。本研究的实施及服务结果均令人满意。在EENC的可接受性、可行性、采用性和保真性方面存在障碍,如护士-助产士对证据的接受,管理人员对其管理下员工实施EENC的支持,以及充足资源的分配。结论:综合医院可以有效实施EENC,但影响EENC实施的因素包括护助人员对证据的接受程度、管理人员的支持程度和资源配置等。研究发现,EENC的实施对新生儿及其母亲都有益。我们的研究结果表明,EENC应纳入常规产科护理和护理实践的一部分。
{"title":"Adopting Early Essential Newborn Care (EENC) in the Delivery Room: An Implementation Study From China","authors":"Min Yang,&nbsp;Caiyun Wang,&nbsp;Linlin Cao,&nbsp;Xiu Zhu,&nbsp;Jie Lu","doi":"10.1111/birt.70009","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Early Essential Newborn Care (EENC) is a highly beneficial and cost-effective set of evidence-based interventions for newborns and their mothers. However, the implementation of EENC as part of routine clinical practice in the delivery room has not yet been achieved in China. The purpose of this study was to describe the adoption of EENC in general hospitals in China and to evaluate its implementation impacts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was an implementation study. The design of the implementation process was guided by a Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the conceptual model of implementation research. Mixed methods were used to evaluate the implementation of EENC with qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, including implementation outcomes, service outcomes, and patient outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 279 patients and 25 nurse-midwives were evaluated in this study. Both the implementation and service outcomes in this study were satisfactory. Obstacles were reported in the acceptability, feasibility, adoption, and fidelity of EENC, such as the acceptance of evidence by nurse-midwives, the support of managers to implement EENC in staff under their management, and the allocation of adequate resources. For patient outcomes, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization (27.1% vs. 39.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and early initiation of breastfeeding (51.4% vs. 64.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) improved after EENC was implemented. Furthermore, the amount of vaginal bleeding after 2 h by subjects in the EENC implementation group [(283.92 ± 71.31 mL) vs. (308.78 ± 84.42 mL), <i>t</i> = 2.694, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05] was also significantly reduced.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>EENC can be effectively implemented in general hospitals, but some factors affecting the implementation of EENC included the acceptance of evidence by nurse-midwives, support from managers, and resource allocation. The implementation of EENC was found to be beneficial to newborns and their mothers. Our findings indicate that EENC should be incorporated as part of routine maternity care and nursing practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"155-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Lunar Phases During Day and Night Cycles on Perinatal Outcomes: A Nationwide Cohort Study 昼夜周期月相对围产期结局的影响:一项全国性队列研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70013
Karin Windsperger, Tim Dorittke, Dana A. Muin, Herbert Kiss, Wilhelm Oberaigner, Hermann Leitner, Alex Farr

Background

Light changes during the lunar cycle affect rhythms in diverse species. Human studies focusing on whether the moon influences human health have so far neglected the effects of light/dark cycles. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether lunar phases impact perinatal outcomes by considering illumination levels due to day/night rhythms.

Methods

To assess the influence of moon phases, this nationwide cohort study identified cases with a singleton pregnancy that involved daytime (06:00 a.m. to 08:59 p.m.) and nighttime (09:00 p.m. to 05:59 a.m.) delivery at ≥ 23 + 0 gestational weeks with a birthweight of ≥ 500 g. Data on women who underwent elective cesarean or labor induction were excluded from the analyses. The lunar cycle was categorized as full moon, new moon, or other lunar phases. The standardized birth ratio (SBR) was chosen as the primary outcome parameter, while the duration of labor and adverse neonatal short-term health (pH of < 7.2 and/or a 5-min Apgar score of < 7) were chosen as the secondary outcome variables.

Results

We identified a total case number of 462,947 births, of which 242,518 (52.4%) occurred during the day and 220,429 (47.6%) at night. Different moon phases did not appear to influence either the SBR or adverse neonatal outcomes. However, nighttime births may show a trend toward a prolonged maximum duration of labor related to moon phases (62 vs. 65 vs. 70 h for new/full/other moon phases, p = 0.05).

Discussion

Considering illumination levels, some moon phases may increase the risk for prolonged births during nighttime. However, assessing the effect of lunar phases on health variables is complex. Co-environmental agents should be incorporated into future analyses.

背景:月相周期的光线变化影响着不同物种的节律。迄今为止,关注月球是否影响人类健康的人类研究忽视了光/暗周期的影响。本研究的目的是通过考虑昼夜节律引起的光照水平来研究月相是否会影响围产期结局。方法:为了评估月相的影响,这项全国性的队列研究确定了白天(早上06:00)单胎妊娠的病例。至晚上8时59分)及夜间(晚上9时)≥23 + 0孕周分娩,出生体重≥500g。选择性剖宫产或引产的妇女数据被排除在分析之外。月球周期分为满月、新月或其他月相。标准化出生比(SBR)被选为主要结局参数,而分娩持续时间和新生儿短期不良健康(结果pH值:我们确定了462,947例新生儿,其中242,518例(52.4%)发生在白天,220,429例(47.6%)发生在夜间。不同的月相似乎不影响SBR或不良新生儿结局。然而,夜间分娩可能显示出与月相相关的最长分娩时间延长的趋势(新月/满月/其他月相为62小时vs. 65小时vs. 70小时,p = 0.05)。讨论:考虑到光照水平,某些月相可能会增加夜间分娩时间延长的风险。然而,评估月相对健康变量的影响是复杂的。共同环境因素应纳入未来的分析。
{"title":"The Impact of Lunar Phases During Day and Night Cycles on Perinatal Outcomes: A Nationwide Cohort Study","authors":"Karin Windsperger,&nbsp;Tim Dorittke,&nbsp;Dana A. Muin,&nbsp;Herbert Kiss,&nbsp;Wilhelm Oberaigner,&nbsp;Hermann Leitner,&nbsp;Alex Farr","doi":"10.1111/birt.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Light changes during the lunar cycle affect rhythms in diverse species. Human studies focusing on whether the moon influences human health have so far neglected the effects of light/dark cycles. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether lunar phases impact perinatal outcomes by considering illumination levels due to day/night rhythms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the influence of moon phases, this nationwide cohort study identified cases with a singleton pregnancy that involved daytime (06:00 a.m. to 08:59 p.m.) and nighttime (09:00 p.m. to 05:59 a.m.) delivery at ≥ 23 + 0 gestational weeks with a birthweight of ≥ 500 g. Data on women who underwent elective cesarean or labor induction were excluded from the analyses. The lunar cycle was categorized as full moon, new moon, or other lunar phases. The standardized birth ratio (SBR) was chosen as the primary outcome parameter, while the duration of labor and adverse neonatal short-term health (pH of &lt; 7.2 and/or a 5-min Apgar score of &lt; 7) were chosen as the secondary outcome variables.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We identified a total case number of 462,947 births, of which 242,518 (52.4%) occurred during the day and 220,429 (47.6%) at night. Different moon phases did not appear to influence either the SBR or adverse neonatal outcomes. However, nighttime births may show a trend toward a prolonged maximum duration of labor related to moon phases (62 vs. 65 vs. 70 h for new/full/other moon phases, <i>p</i> = 0.05).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Considering illumination levels, some moon phases may increase the risk for prolonged births during nighttime. However, assessing the effect of lunar phases on health variables is complex. Co-environmental agents should be incorporated into future analyses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"192-200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal Timing of Term Births by Maternal Region of Birth: Elective Induction of Labor Compared to Expectant Management in Victoria, Australia 按产妇出生地区划分的足月分娩最佳时机:与澳大利亚维多利亚州的待产管理相比,选择性引产。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70003
Sharon D. Weerasingha, Roshan J. Selvaratnam, Mary-Ann Davey, Sarah E. Butler, Kirsten R. Palmer, Miranda L. Davies-Tuck

Background

Induction of labor (IOL) has been suggested to mitigate the elevated risks of perinatal mortality in migrant women. The aim was to estimate the rates of perinatal mortality, cesarean, instrumental birth, and admission to the special care nursery or neonatal intensive care unit (SCN/NICU) for births following IOL compared to expectant management at 37–41 weeks' gestation by maternal region of birth.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort of all vertex singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies, 37 to 41 weeks' gestation in Victoria, Australia, from 2012 to 2019. Perinatal mortality rates were reported by region of birth. Multivariable log binomial regression models were used to estimate the association between outcomes and IOL compared to expectant management by region of birth.

Results

There was no improvement in the perinatal mortality rate with IOL at any gestation for non-Australian region of birth groups. IOL at 38 weeks was associated with an increasing risk of cesarean birth for Australian, New Zealand, Oceanic, African, and South-East Asian and East Asian-born women, with a higher risk for South Asian-born women at 39 weeks. Compared to expectant management, the risk of instrumental birth was similar at each gestational week for Australian-born women; whereas for African and South Asian-born women, the risk was highest at 37 weeks; for Oceanic-born women, this occurred at 38 weeks. An inverse relationship between the week of IOL and admission to the SCN/NICU was observed for all births.

Conclusions

IOL was associated with an increased risk of cesarean birth, instrumental birth, and admission to the SCN/NICU in many situations without an improvement in perinatal mortality rates.

背景:引产(IOL)已被建议降低移民妇女围产期死亡率升高的风险。目的是估计围产儿死亡率、剖宫产率、器械分娩率,以及在37-41周妊娠时,与待产相比,IOL后出生的婴儿进入特殊护理托儿所或新生儿重症监护病房(SCN/NICU)的比率。方法:2012年至2019年,在澳大利亚维多利亚州以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究,所有顶点单胎,妊娠37至41周的无并发症妊娠。按出生地区报告了围产期死亡率。使用多变量对数二项回归模型来估计结果与IOL之间的关联,而不是按出生地区进行预期管理。结果:非澳大利亚地区出生组的任何妊娠期人工晶状体围产儿死亡率均无改善。在澳大利亚、新西兰、大洋洲、非洲、东南亚和东亚出生的妇女中,38周的人工晶状体植入与剖宫产风险增加有关,而在南亚出生的妇女中,39周的风险更高。与待产管理相比,澳大利亚出生的妇女在每个妊娠周使用器械分娩的风险相似;而在非洲和南亚出生的女性,风险在37周时最高;在大洋出生的女性,这发生在38周。在所有新生儿中,观察到人工晶状体植入周数与SCN/NICU入院时间呈负相关。结论:在许多情况下,IOL与剖宫产、器械分娩和入住SCN/NICU的风险增加有关,但并未改善围产期死亡率。
{"title":"Optimal Timing of Term Births by Maternal Region of Birth: Elective Induction of Labor Compared to Expectant Management in Victoria, Australia","authors":"Sharon D. Weerasingha,&nbsp;Roshan J. Selvaratnam,&nbsp;Mary-Ann Davey,&nbsp;Sarah E. Butler,&nbsp;Kirsten R. Palmer,&nbsp;Miranda L. Davies-Tuck","doi":"10.1111/birt.70003","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Induction of labor (IOL) has been suggested to mitigate the elevated risks of perinatal mortality in migrant women. The aim was to estimate the rates of perinatal mortality, cesarean, instrumental birth, and admission to the special care nursery or neonatal intensive care unit (SCN/NICU) for births following IOL compared to expectant management at 37–41 weeks' gestation by maternal region of birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A population-based retrospective cohort of all vertex singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies, 37 to 41 weeks' gestation in Victoria, Australia, from 2012 to 2019. Perinatal mortality rates were reported by region of birth. Multivariable log binomial regression models were used to estimate the association between outcomes and IOL compared to expectant management by region of birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There was no improvement in the perinatal mortality rate with IOL at any gestation for non-Australian region of birth groups. IOL at 38 weeks was associated with an increasing risk of cesarean birth for Australian, New Zealand, Oceanic, African, and South-East Asian and East Asian-born women, with a higher risk for South Asian-born women at 39 weeks. Compared to expectant management, the risk of instrumental birth was similar at each gestational week for Australian-born women; whereas for African and South Asian-born women, the risk was highest at 37 weeks; for Oceanic-born women, this occurred at 38 weeks. An inverse relationship between the week of IOL and admission to the SCN/NICU was observed for all births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>IOL was associated with an increased risk of cesarean birth, instrumental birth, and admission to the SCN/NICU in many situations without an improvement in perinatal mortality rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144857106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing a Co-Designed Strategy to Improve Labor Monitoring and Management in India Using the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A Mixed-Methods Formative Study 制定共同设计的战略,利用世界卫生组织劳工护理指南改善印度的劳工监测和管理:一项混合方法形成性研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70004
Elizabeth Armari, Sunil S. Vernekar, Yeshita Pujar, Veronica Pingray, Fernando Althabe, Luz Gibbons, Mabel Berrueta, Alvaro Ciganda, Rocio Rodriguez, Jayashree Ashok Kumar, Shruti Bhavi Patil, Aravind Karinagannanavar, Raveendra R. Anteen, Pavithra M. R., Savitri Bendigeri, Shukla Shetty, B. Latha, Megha H. M., Suman S. Gaddi, Shaila Chikkagowdra, Bellara Raghavendra, Caroline S. E. Homer, Manjunath Somannavar, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Joshua P. Vogel

Introduction

Nearly half of all perinatal deaths occur during the intrapartum period due to inadequate labor monitoring and intervention. The partograph, a paper-based labor monitoring tool, can assist providers in recognizing and acting on early signs of fetal–maternal distress if used effectively. In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a “next generation” partograph called the Labour Care Guide. There is limited evidence of how to optimize the use and impact of this new tool. This study describes the development of a co-designed LCG implementation strategy in Karnataka, India.

Methods

A targeted literature review, primary research across four public maternity hospitals (provider survey and facility assessment), and a 2-day co-design workshop with stakeholders were conducted. Findings were mapped to six target behaviors using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model to identify potential barriers and facilitators to LCG use. Consultations with local stakeholders explored these factors, and a 1-week pilot informed final refinements of the strategy.

Results

The LCG implementation strategy comprised an evidence-based provider training program centered on “low dose, high frequency” principles, and monthly audit and feedback cycles, which in turn, relies on an enabling practice environment (supportive national policy frameworks, facility-level guidelines, external partnerships, senior support, defining provider roles and expectations and adequate equipment and resources) to support its implementation.

Conclusion

Effective use of the LCG needs a robust, context-sensitive implementation strategy. We present the first evidence-based, co-designed LCG implementation strategy which can be used to support LCG dissemination and uptake.

导言:由于分娩监测和干预不足,近一半的围产期死亡发生在分娩期。产程图是一种基于纸张的劳动监测工具,如果使用有效,可以帮助提供者识别并对胎儿-产妇窘迫的早期迹象采取行动。2020年,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)制定了名为《分娩护理指南》的“下一代”章节。关于如何优化这种新工具的使用和影响的证据有限。本研究描述了在印度卡纳塔克邦共同设计的LCG实施战略的发展。方法:有针对性的文献综述,在四家公立妇产医院进行初步研究(提供者调查和设施评估),并与利益相关者进行为期两天的共同设计研讨会。使用理论领域框架(TDF)和能力、机会和动机-行为(COM-B)模型将研究结果映射到六种目标行为,以确定使用LCG的潜在障碍和促进因素。与当地利益相关者协商探讨了这些因素,为期一周的试点为战略的最终完善提供了信息。结果:LCG实施战略包括一个以“低剂量、高频率”原则为中心的循证提供者培训计划,以及每月的审计和反馈周期,而这反过来又依赖于一个有利的实践环境(支持性的国家政策框架、设施级指导方针、外部伙伴关系、高级支持、确定提供者的角色和期望以及充足的设备和资源)来支持其实施。结论:有效地使用LCG需要一个稳健的、上下文敏感的实施策略。我们提出了第一个以证据为基础,共同设计的LCG实施战略,可用于支持LCG的传播和吸收。
{"title":"Developing a Co-Designed Strategy to Improve Labor Monitoring and Management in India Using the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A Mixed-Methods Formative Study","authors":"Elizabeth Armari,&nbsp;Sunil S. Vernekar,&nbsp;Yeshita Pujar,&nbsp;Veronica Pingray,&nbsp;Fernando Althabe,&nbsp;Luz Gibbons,&nbsp;Mabel Berrueta,&nbsp;Alvaro Ciganda,&nbsp;Rocio Rodriguez,&nbsp;Jayashree Ashok Kumar,&nbsp;Shruti Bhavi Patil,&nbsp;Aravind Karinagannanavar,&nbsp;Raveendra R. Anteen,&nbsp;Pavithra M. R.,&nbsp;Savitri Bendigeri,&nbsp;Shukla Shetty,&nbsp;B. Latha,&nbsp;Megha H. M.,&nbsp;Suman S. Gaddi,&nbsp;Shaila Chikkagowdra,&nbsp;Bellara Raghavendra,&nbsp;Caroline S. E. Homer,&nbsp;Manjunath Somannavar,&nbsp;Shivaprasad S. Goudar,&nbsp;Joshua P. Vogel","doi":"10.1111/birt.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Nearly half of all perinatal deaths occur during the intrapartum period due to inadequate labor monitoring and intervention. The partograph, a paper-based labor monitoring tool, can assist providers in recognizing and acting on early signs of fetal–maternal distress if used effectively. In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a “next generation” partograph called the Labour Care Guide. There is limited evidence of how to optimize the use and impact of this new tool. This study describes the development of a co-designed LCG implementation strategy in Karnataka, India.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A targeted literature review, primary research across four public maternity hospitals (provider survey and facility assessment), and a 2-day co-design workshop with stakeholders were conducted. Findings were mapped to six target behaviors using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model to identify potential barriers and facilitators to LCG use. Consultations with local stakeholders explored these factors, and a 1-week pilot informed final refinements of the strategy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The LCG implementation strategy comprised an evidence-based provider training program centered on “low dose, high frequency” principles, and monthly audit and feedback cycles, which in turn, relies on an enabling practice environment (supportive national policy frameworks, facility-level guidelines, external partnerships, senior support, defining provider roles and expectations and adequate equipment and resources) to support its implementation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Effective use of the LCG needs a robust, context-sensitive implementation strategy. We present the first evidence-based, co-designed LCG implementation strategy which can be used to support LCG dissemination and uptake.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144838616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Childbirth Experiences in the United Kingdom Compared to the Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study 英国与荷兰的分娩经验比较:一项横断面调查研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70006
Lauri M. M. van den Berg, Jens Henrichs, Jeroen van Dillen, Soo Downe, Corine Verhoeven, Ank de Jonge

Introduction

This study was performed to compare childbirth experiences in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) and identify determinants of positive childbirth experiences in both countries.

Methods

Women who gave birth in the UK (n = 1303) or the NL (n = 900) between January 2017 and December 2020 who filled in the cross-sectional Babies Born Better survey were included in this study. Fully adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess differences in the odds of a positive childbirth experience between the two countries. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of a positive childbirth experience, including socio-demographic factors, pregnancy and childbirth outcomes, and care-related determinants.

Results

Respondents giving birth in the UK had decreased odds of a positive childbirth experience compared to NL respondents (66% vs. 85%, AOR 0.45, CI 0.35–0.57). Significant determinants for a positive childbirth experience were multiparity, absence of pregnancy complications, a spontaneous vaginal birth, and giving birth at home. UK respondents who had a planned caesarean section had a higher likelihood of reporting a positive childbirth experience when adjusted for confounders. Having a doctor as the primary birth care provider was less likely to be associated with a positive childbirth experience in the UK.

Conclusions

Most women in both the NL and the UK reported positive childbirth experiences, but NL respondents were more likely to do so. Determinants of a positive birth experience were mostly factors associated with uncomplicated labor and birth, or linked with fulfilled choices and with being multiparous.

本研究旨在比较英国(UK)和荷兰(NL)的分娩经历,并确定两国积极分娩经历的决定因素。方法:2017年1月至2020年12月期间在英国(n = 1303)或英国(n = 900)分娩的妇女(n = 900)填写了横断面婴儿出生更好的调查。完全调整的逻辑回归模型被用来评估两国之间积极分娩经历的几率差异。进行了分层逻辑回归分析,以确定积极分娩经历的决定因素,包括社会人口因素、妊娠和分娩结局以及与护理相关的决定因素。结果:与NL受访者相比,在英国分娩的受访者积极分娩经历的几率降低(66%对85%,AOR 0.45, CI 0.35-0.57)。积极分娩经历的重要决定因素是多胎、无妊娠并发症、自然阴道分娩和在家分娩。在调整混杂因素后,计划剖腹产的英国受访者报告积极分娩经历的可能性更高。在英国,有医生作为初级分娩保健提供者不太可能与积极的分娩经历联系在一起。结论:美国和英国的大多数女性都报告了积极的分娩经历,但美国的受访者更有可能这样做。积极的分娩经历的决定因素主要是与简单的分娩和分娩有关的因素,或者与完成的选择和多胞胎有关。
{"title":"Childbirth Experiences in the United Kingdom Compared to the Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study","authors":"Lauri M. M. van den Berg,&nbsp;Jens Henrichs,&nbsp;Jeroen van Dillen,&nbsp;Soo Downe,&nbsp;Corine Verhoeven,&nbsp;Ank de Jonge","doi":"10.1111/birt.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was performed to compare childbirth experiences in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) and identify determinants of positive childbirth experiences in both countries.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Women who gave birth in the UK (<i>n</i> = 1303) or the NL (<i>n</i> = 900) between January 2017 and December 2020 who filled in the cross-sectional Babies Born Better survey were included in this study. Fully adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess differences in the odds of a positive childbirth experience between the two countries. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of a positive childbirth experience, including socio-demographic factors, pregnancy and childbirth outcomes, and care-related determinants.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Respondents giving birth in the UK had decreased odds of a positive childbirth experience compared to NL respondents (66% vs. 85%, AOR 0.45, CI 0.35–0.57). Significant determinants for a positive childbirth experience were multiparity, absence of pregnancy complications, a spontaneous vaginal birth, and giving birth at home. UK respondents who had a planned caesarean section had a higher likelihood of reporting a positive childbirth experience when adjusted for confounders. Having a doctor as the primary birth care provider was less likely to be associated with a positive childbirth experience in the UK.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Most women in both the NL and the UK reported positive childbirth experiences, but NL respondents were more likely to do so. Determinants of a positive birth experience were mostly factors associated with uncomplicated labor and birth, or linked with fulfilled choices and with being multiparous.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144838615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consensus Guidelines for Intermittent Auscultation in United States Community Birth Settings 美国社区分娩环境间歇听诊的共识指南。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70002
Silke Akerson, Sarah Bradbury, Rosanna Davis, Wendy Gordon, Amy Romano, Holly Scholles

Background

Intermittent auscultation is the gold standard for fetal assessment in uncomplicated pregnancies and labors and is used universally in the community birth setting. Great variation exists in intermittent auscultation practices and language used by community birth midwives across the country. Current standards, as defined by midwifery schools, state midwifery licensing boards, and individual midwifery practices, differ significantly and sometimes contradict each other. Community birth midwives, nurses and birth assistants, midwifery educators and those working in community birth quality improvement have been in need of common language and guidance on best practices in intermittent auscultation.

Objective

Develop and disseminate consensus standards for intermittent auscultation in the community birth setting in the United States.

Methodology

Creation of guidelines through a 21-month consensus process with a workgroup of educators, leaders, quality improvement experts, and practicing midwives by identifying practices supported by evidence or clinical experience, evaluating current evidence and guidelines, eliciting feedback from education, midwifery, nursing, and birth center organizations, and incorporating revisions to create the final document.

Results

Consensus was reached on various elements of intermittent auscultation and guidelines were created. These guidelines address readiness, assessment, interpretation, and documentation of fetal heart tones, clinical decision making, and areas for future research. These guidelines provide a minimum standard for performance and documentation of intermittent auscultation in community birth midwifery practice.

背景:间歇听诊是评估无并发症妊娠和分娩胎儿的金标准,在社区分娩环境中被普遍使用。全国各地社区助产士在间歇听诊实践和语言使用方面存在很大差异。目前的标准,由助产学校、州助产许可委员会和个人助产实践定义,差异很大,有时甚至相互矛盾。社区助产士、护士和助产助理、助产教育工作者和从事社区分娩质量改善工作的人员需要关于间歇性听诊最佳做法的共同语言和指导。目的:在美国社区分娩环境中制定和传播间歇性听诊的共识标准。方法:由教育工作者、领导、质量改进专家和执业助产士组成的工作组通过21个月的共识过程,确定有证据或临床经验支持的实践,评估当前的证据和指南,从教育、助产、护理和生育中心组织中获取反馈,并纳入修订以创建最终文件,从而制定指南。结果:对间歇听诊的各种要素达成了共识,并制定了指南。这些指南涉及准备,评估,解释和文件胎心音,临床决策,并为未来的研究领域。这些指南为社区助产实践中间歇性听诊的表现和记录提供了最低标准。
{"title":"Consensus Guidelines for Intermittent Auscultation in United States Community Birth Settings","authors":"Silke Akerson,&nbsp;Sarah Bradbury,&nbsp;Rosanna Davis,&nbsp;Wendy Gordon,&nbsp;Amy Romano,&nbsp;Holly Scholles","doi":"10.1111/birt.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Intermittent auscultation is the gold standard for fetal assessment in uncomplicated pregnancies and labors and is used universally in the community birth setting. Great variation exists in intermittent auscultation practices and language used by community birth midwives across the country. Current standards, as defined by midwifery schools, state midwifery licensing boards, and individual midwifery practices, differ significantly and sometimes contradict each other. Community birth midwives, nurses and birth assistants, midwifery educators and those working in community birth quality improvement have been in need of common language and guidance on best practices in intermittent auscultation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Develop and disseminate consensus standards for intermittent auscultation in the community birth setting in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methodology</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Creation of guidelines through a 21-month consensus process with a workgroup of educators, leaders, quality improvement experts, and practicing midwives by identifying practices supported by evidence or clinical experience, evaluating current evidence and guidelines, eliciting feedback from education, midwifery, nursing, and birth center organizations, and incorporating revisions to create the final document.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Consensus was reached on various elements of intermittent auscultation and guidelines were created. These guidelines address readiness, assessment, interpretation, and documentation of fetal heart tones, clinical decision making, and areas for future research. These guidelines provide a minimum standard for performance and documentation of intermittent auscultation in community birth midwifery practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144562075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Birth Outcomes After Sexual Violence and the Role of Disclosure to the Maternity Care Provider 性暴力后的生育结果和向产妇保健提供者披露的作用。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70001
Hannah de Klerk, Janneke Gitsels, Ank de Jonge, Elsa Montgomery, Janneke van't Hooft, Marit van der Pijl, Martine Hollander, Corine Verhoeven

Background

Sexual violence (SV) history is associated with various birth outcomes. Yet, the underlying mechanisms of these associations have not been sufficiently explained. Disclosure of SV history to a maternity care provider may play an important role in maternity care providers' choice for birth interventions and in women's birth experience.

Methods

A cross-sectional nationwide survey was conducted among women who had given birth in the 5 years prior to completing the questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the associations between SV history (total, disclosed, and undisclosed) and birth outcomes.

Results

Of 10,867 respondents, 1121 (10.3%) reported SV, of whom 582 (52%) disclosed to their maternity care provider. Respondents who disclosed their SV history had lower adjusted odds of episiotomy than respondents without an SV history (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 0.56–0.90). Primiparous respondents who disclosed their SV history had increased odds of unplanned cesarean birth compared to spontaneous (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04–1.81) and assisted vaginal birth (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.17–2.61). Primiparous respondents with both a disclosed and undisclosed SV history had increased adjusted odds of negative birth (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.50–2.12). There were no differences in referral to obstetrician-led care, home birth, preterm labor, and pharmaceutical pain relief between groups.

Conclusions

When people disclose their SV history, maternity care providers are less likely to perform an episiotomy, and more likely to choose an unplanned cesarean birth over vaginal birth. However, disclosure of SV history does not ameliorate the birth experience and we therefore recommend better implementation of trauma-informed birth support for women with an SV history.

背景:性暴力(SV)史与各种出生结局有关。然而,这些关联的潜在机制尚未得到充分解释。向产科保健提供者披露SV病史可能在产科保健提供者选择分娩干预措施和妇女分娩经验方面发挥重要作用。方法:在全国范围内对填写问卷前5年内生育的妇女进行横断面调查。采用Logistic回归分析比较SV史(总、公开和未公开)与出生结果之间的关系。结果:在10867名受访者中,1121名(10.3%)报告了性侵犯,其中582名(52%)向产科保健提供者披露了性侵犯。有SV病史的被调查者比没有SV病史的被调查者进行会阴切开术的调整后几率更低(调整后优势比[AOR] 0.71, 95%可信区间[95% CI] 0.56-0.90)。与自然分娩(OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.81)和辅助阴道分娩(OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.17-2.61)相比,披露其SV史的初产妇发生计划外剖宫产的几率更高。无论是公开的还是未公开的SV史的初产应答者均增加了负出生的调整后几率(AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.50-2.12)。在产科医生主导的护理、家庭分娩、早产和药物疼痛缓解方面,两组之间没有差异。结论:当人们透露他们的SV病史时,产科护理提供者不太可能进行外阴切开术,更有可能选择计划外剖宫产而不是阴道分娩。然而,披露SV史并不能改善分娩体验,因此我们建议对有SV史的妇女更好地实施创伤知情分娩支持。
{"title":"Birth Outcomes After Sexual Violence and the Role of Disclosure to the Maternity Care Provider","authors":"Hannah de Klerk,&nbsp;Janneke Gitsels,&nbsp;Ank de Jonge,&nbsp;Elsa Montgomery,&nbsp;Janneke van't Hooft,&nbsp;Marit van der Pijl,&nbsp;Martine Hollander,&nbsp;Corine Verhoeven","doi":"10.1111/birt.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sexual violence (SV) history is associated with various birth outcomes. Yet, the underlying mechanisms of these associations have not been sufficiently explained. Disclosure of SV history to a maternity care provider may play an important role in maternity care providers' choice for birth interventions and in women's birth experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional nationwide survey was conducted among women who had given birth in the 5 years prior to completing the questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the associations between SV history (total, disclosed, and undisclosed) and birth outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 10,867 respondents, 1121 (10.3%) reported SV, of whom 582 (52%) disclosed to their maternity care provider. Respondents who disclosed their SV history had lower adjusted odds of episiotomy than respondents without an SV history (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 0.56–0.90). Primiparous respondents who disclosed their SV history had increased odds of unplanned cesarean birth compared to spontaneous (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04–1.81) and assisted vaginal birth (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.17–2.61). Primiparous respondents with both a disclosed and undisclosed SV history had increased adjusted odds of negative birth (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.50–2.12). There were no differences in referral to obstetrician-led care, home birth, preterm labor, and pharmaceutical pain relief between groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When people disclose their SV history, maternity care providers are less likely to perform an episiotomy, and more likely to choose an unplanned cesarean birth over vaginal birth. However, disclosure of SV history does not ameliorate the birth experience and we therefore recommend better implementation of trauma-informed birth support for women with an SV history.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"88-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144546266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventions and Strategies for Reducing Episiotomy Rates Globally: A Systematic Review 全球降低外阴切开术率的干预措施和策略:一项系统综述。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/birt.70000
Angela W. Chen, Maiah J. Hall, Molly R. Altman

Introduction

Episiotomy is still commonly practiced during childbirth worldwide, despite decades of scientific evidence that indicates no justification for its routine use. Routine episiotomy is associated with increased risk of serious maternal morbidity and no improvements in neonatal outcomes. We sought to analyze this gap between evidence-based knowledge and implementation surrounding reducing episiotomy practice. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify practices that have resulted in a change in episiotomy rates.

Methods

We searched three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase) using key words and subject headings with no time restriction. Any studies published in English and reporting an original empirical analysis in any global, regional, or country-specific context that examined practice changes that were implemented and reported episiotomy as an outcome were included in our review. Studies were excluded if they only reported on trends or changes in episiotomy rates without examining the specific practices implemented. We sought to identify practices that resulted in a change in episiotomy rates, rather than to evaluate or compare the effectiveness of these practices.

Results

Search results returned 1265 records; 40 papers met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Twenty-five papers were included in our final analysis. All included studies documented a decrease in episiotomy rates, with 21 studies reporting a statistically significant reduction. Most studies were mixed interventions, often a combination of an educational intervention and audit and feedback.

Conclusions

Specific practice changes have been shown to effectively decrease the incidence of episiotomy. The findings from our review provide actionable insights for implementing evidence-based interventions to improve obstetric care. Prioritizing respectful birthing practices and reducing the routine use of episiotomy are critical steps toward addressing obstetric violence and promoting equitable, patient-centered maternity care globally.

导读:外阴切开术在世界范围内仍然普遍应用于分娩,尽管几十年的科学证据表明没有理由将其作为常规使用。常规外阴切开术与严重产妇发病率增加和新生儿结局无改善相关。我们试图分析循证知识与围绕减少会阴切开术实践的实施之间的差距。我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定导致外阴切开术率变化的做法。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL Complete、Embase 3个数据库,检索关键词和主题词,检索时间不限。在全球、地区或国家特定背景下,任何以英文发表并报告原始实证分析的研究都被纳入我们的综述,这些研究检查了实施外阴切开术的实践变化并报告了其结果。如果研究只报告了外阴切开术率的趋势或变化,而没有检查实施的具体做法,则排除研究。我们试图确定导致会阴切开术率变化的做法,而不是评估或比较这些做法的有效性。结果:搜索结果返回1265条记录;40篇论文符合全面综述的纳入标准。我们的最终分析包括25篇论文。所有纳入的研究都记录了会阴切开术发生率的降低,其中21项研究报告了统计学上显著的降低。大多数研究都是混合干预,通常是教育干预和审计和反馈的结合。结论:具体的实践改变已被证明可以有效地降低会阴切开术的发生率。我们综述的结果为实施循证干预措施以改善产科护理提供了可行的见解。优先考虑尊重分娩做法和减少外阴切开术的常规使用是解决产科暴力和促进全球公平、以患者为中心的产科护理的关键步骤。
{"title":"Interventions and Strategies for Reducing Episiotomy Rates Globally: A Systematic Review","authors":"Angela W. Chen,&nbsp;Maiah J. Hall,&nbsp;Molly R. Altman","doi":"10.1111/birt.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Episiotomy is still commonly practiced during childbirth worldwide, despite decades of scientific evidence that indicates no justification for its routine use. Routine episiotomy is associated with increased risk of serious maternal morbidity and no improvements in neonatal outcomes. We sought to analyze this gap between evidence-based knowledge and implementation surrounding reducing episiotomy practice. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify practices that have resulted in a change in episiotomy rates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase) using key words and subject headings with no time restriction. Any studies published in English and reporting an original empirical analysis in any global, regional, or country-specific context that examined practice changes that were implemented and reported episiotomy as an outcome were included in our review. Studies were excluded if they only reported on trends or changes in episiotomy rates without examining the specific practices implemented. We sought to identify practices that resulted in a change in episiotomy rates, rather than to evaluate or compare the effectiveness of these practices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Search results returned 1265 records; 40 papers met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Twenty-five papers were included in our final analysis. All included studies documented a decrease in episiotomy rates, with 21 studies reporting a statistically significant reduction. Most studies were mixed interventions, often a combination of an educational intervention and audit and feedback.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Specific practice changes have been shown to effectively decrease the incidence of episiotomy. The findings from our review provide actionable insights for implementing evidence-based interventions to improve obstetric care. Prioritizing respectful birthing practices and reducing the routine use of episiotomy are critical steps toward addressing obstetric violence and promoting equitable, patient-centered maternity care globally.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"52 4","pages":"539-552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144477969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics and Outcomes Among Asian Birthing People in the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry 美国出生中心协会围产期数据登记中心中亚洲分娩人群的特征和结果。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12923
Amy H. Goh, Dia Aurora Kapoor, Anna Nguyen, Devi Soman, Diana R. Jolles

Background

Asian birthing people have the second highest rates of cesarean birth (CB), lowest rates of community (home and birth center), and midwife-attended births compared to other racial and ethnic groups in the United States.

Methods

The American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry (PDR) was used to abstract socio-demographic and clinical data. Logistic regression analyses identified the drivers of cesarean birth among Asian birthing people in the overall and community birth eligible samples.

Results

Between 2007 and 2021, 2983 people self-identified as Asian within the PDR. The Asian sample had a lower percentage of birth center births and a higher percentage of hospital births, CB, gestational diabetes, and postpartum hemorrhage compared to the overall sample. The cesarean rate in the Asian sample was 12.4%. Asian multiparous birthing people were at 1.5 greater odds of CB compared to White multiparous birthing people (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19–2.03; p < 0.01). Asians in the community birth eligible group had higher odds of CB compared to their White counterparts (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23–1.93; p < 0.01). Asian and White multiparous birthing people admitted to the hospital from the community birth eligible group had five times higher odds of CB compared to the total sample of Asian and White multiparous birthing people (OR = 5.18; 95% CI, 3.77–7.12; p < 0.01).

Discussion

There were lower rates of CB among Asians who birthed in PDR user sites compared to the national average. Future research is needed in community birth outcomes among different Asian ethnicities and Asian birthing people's perspective on community birth.

背景:与美国其他种族和民族相比,亚裔分娩人群的剖宫产率(CB)第二高,社区(家庭和分娩中心)和助产士接生率最低。方法:采用美国出生中心协会围产期数据登记处(PDR)提取社会人口统计学和临床资料。Logistic回归分析确定了总体和社区分娩合格样本中亚洲分娩人群剖宫产的驱动因素。结果:2007年至2021年间,人民民主共和国有2983人自认为是亚洲人。与整体样本相比,亚洲样本的分娩中心分娩比例较低,而住院分娩、CB、妊娠糖尿病和产后出血的比例较高。亚洲样本的剖宫产率为12.4%。亚洲产多胞胎的人比白人产多胞胎的人患CB的几率高1.5倍(OR = 1.54;95% ci, 1.19-2.03;p讨论:与全国平均水平相比,出生在PDR用户站点的亚洲人的CB率较低。亚洲不同种族的社区分娩结果以及亚洲分娩人群对社区分娩的看法有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes Among Asian Birthing People in the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry","authors":"Amy H. Goh,&nbsp;Dia Aurora Kapoor,&nbsp;Anna Nguyen,&nbsp;Devi Soman,&nbsp;Diana R. Jolles","doi":"10.1111/birt.12923","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12923","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Asian birthing people have the second highest rates of cesarean birth (CB), lowest rates of community (home and birth center), and midwife-attended births compared to other racial and ethnic groups in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry (PDR) was used to abstract socio-demographic and clinical data. Logistic regression analyses identified the drivers of cesarean birth among Asian birthing people in the overall and community birth eligible samples.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Between 2007 and 2021, 2983 people self-identified as Asian within the PDR. The Asian sample had a lower percentage of birth center births and a higher percentage of hospital births, CB, gestational diabetes, and postpartum hemorrhage compared to the overall sample. The cesarean rate in the Asian sample was 12.4%. Asian multiparous birthing people were at 1.5 greater odds of CB compared to White multiparous birthing people (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19–2.03; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Asians in the community birth eligible group had higher odds of CB compared to their White counterparts (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23–1.93; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Asian and White multiparous birthing people admitted to the hospital from the community birth eligible group had five times higher odds of CB compared to the total sample of Asian and White multiparous birthing people (OR = 5.18; 95% CI, 3.77–7.12; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There were lower rates of CB among Asians who birthed in PDR user sites compared to the national average. Future research is needed in community birth outcomes among different Asian ethnicities and Asian birthing people's perspective on community birth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12923","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144259432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“The Very Best That It Could Be and a Lot Better Than I Would Have Imagined”: Birthing People's Experiences of Transfer From Community to Hospital “最好的,比我想象的要好得多”:分娩人员从社区转到医院的经历。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12920
Carrie Neerland, Arielle Skalisky, Robyn Schafer

Background

Community births (those in homes or freestanding birth centers) are increasing in the US, although they still represent a small percentage of total births. Research shows that community births can offer positive outcomes for low-risk individuals, such as fewer interventions and greater satisfaction. However, when perinatal complications arise, transfer to hospital can result in negative care outcomes and experiences. Effective integration of care and respectful communication between community and hospital providers during transfers are crucial for improving quality care measures. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and outcomes of individuals transferring from community settings to an urban US hospital with established transfer guidelines.

Methods

This multi-method study, utilizing descriptive statistics and a grounded theory approach, explores the outcomes and experiences of individuals transferring from planned home or birth center births to hospital care for intrapartum management from August 2019 to August 2020. We included participants who were 18 or older, English-speaking, and had experienced a live birth following transfer from home or birth center to hospital. Quantitative outcomes were obtained through chart review. Qualitative interviews were conducted within 6 weeks post-birth, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constant comparative analysis.

Results

A total of 82 individuals transferred during the study period, with 23 participating in qualitative interviews, we identified 5 major themes: seamless transfer, teamwork, respectful care, changing expectations, and a complex relationship with autonomy and decision-making. Participants valued smooth communication, midwife-to-midwife transfer of care, and the balance between autonomy and reliance on provider recommendations during transfers.

Discussion

Understanding the experiences of those who transfer from community settings to hospitals is crucial for improving perinatal care. With established guidelines for transfer in place to facilitate collaboration across care providers and birth settings, transfers can be managed effectively, resulting in respectful experiences of care with positive health outcomes.

背景:在美国,社区出生(那些在家里或独立的生育中心出生的人)正在增加,尽管他们仍然只占总出生人数的一小部分。研究表明,社区分娩可以为低风险个体提供积极的结果,例如更少的干预和更高的满意度。然而,当围产期并发症出现时,转到医院可能会导致负面的护理结果和经历。在转院期间,社区和医院提供者之间有效整合护理和相互尊重的沟通对于改善优质护理措施至关重要。本研究旨在调查有既定转院指南的个人从社区转到美国城市医院的经历和结果。方法:本研究采用描述性统计和基于理论的方法,探讨2019年8月至2020年8月从计划生育的家庭或生育中心转移到医院进行分娩管理的结果和经验。我们纳入了年满18岁、会说英语、经历过从家庭或分娩中心转移到医院后的活产的参与者。通过图表回顾获得定量结果。在出生后6周内进行定性访谈,记录,转录,并使用持续比较分析进行分析。结果:研究期间共转移了82名个体,其中23人参与了定性访谈,我们确定了5个主要主题:无缝转移,团队合作,尊重关怀,变化的期望以及自主和决策的复杂关系。参与者重视顺畅的沟通,助产士到助产士的护理转移,以及在转移过程中自主和依赖提供者建议之间的平衡。讨论:了解那些从社区转到医院的人的经历对改善围产期护理至关重要。有了既定的转诊指导方针,以促进护理提供者和分娩机构之间的协作,就可以有效地管理转诊,从而产生相互尊重的护理体验,并产生积极的健康结果。
{"title":"“The Very Best That It Could Be and a Lot Better Than I Would Have Imagined”: Birthing People's Experiences of Transfer From Community to Hospital","authors":"Carrie Neerland,&nbsp;Arielle Skalisky,&nbsp;Robyn Schafer","doi":"10.1111/birt.12920","DOIUrl":"10.1111/birt.12920","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Community births (those in homes or freestanding birth centers) are increasing in the US, although they still represent a small percentage of total births. Research shows that community births can offer positive outcomes for low-risk individuals, such as fewer interventions and greater satisfaction. However, when perinatal complications arise, transfer to hospital can result in negative care outcomes and experiences. Effective integration of care and respectful communication between community and hospital providers during transfers are crucial for improving quality care measures. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and outcomes of individuals transferring from community settings to an urban US hospital with established transfer guidelines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This multi-method study, utilizing descriptive statistics and a grounded theory approach, explores the outcomes and experiences of individuals transferring from planned home or birth center births to hospital care for intrapartum management from August 2019 to August 2020. We included participants who were 18 or older, English-speaking, and had experienced a live birth following transfer from home or birth center to hospital. Quantitative outcomes were obtained through chart review. Qualitative interviews were conducted within 6 weeks post-birth, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constant comparative analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 82 individuals transferred during the study period, with 23 participating in qualitative interviews, we identified 5 major themes: seamless transfer, teamwork, respectful care, changing expectations, and a complex relationship with autonomy and decision-making. Participants valued smooth communication, midwife-to-midwife transfer of care, and the balance between autonomy and reliance on provider recommendations during transfers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Understanding the experiences of those who transfer from community settings to hospitals is crucial for improving perinatal care. With established guidelines for transfer in place to facilitate collaboration across care providers and birth settings, transfers can be managed effectively, resulting in respectful experiences of care with positive health outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"52 4","pages":"717-725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12920","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144152904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1