College students face significant mental health challenges, yet many are reluctant to seek professional mental health help. This study examined the relative contributions of public stigma, self-stigma, depression, and negative network orientation to help-seeking attitudes among college students, controlling for demographic factors. Data were collected from 395 college students enrolled in U.S. postsecondary institutions. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that all examined factors significantly influenced help-seeking attitudes, with self-stigma emerging as the strongest predictor, followed by negative network orientation, public stigma, and depression. The full model accounted for 66.2% of the variance in help-seeking attitudes. Demographic factors explained 13.6% of the variance, with women, gender nonbinary/nonconforming, and bi/multiracial students reporting more positive attitudes toward seeking help in the final model. These findings underscore the complex interplay of factors shaping help-seeking attitudes and emphasize the importance of interventions targeting stigma and negative perceptions of social support networks to improve mental health service utilization among college students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
大学生面临着重大的心理健康挑战,但许多人不愿寻求专业的心理健康帮助。本研究在控制人口学因素的情况下,考察了公共耻感、自我耻感、抑郁和负性网络取向对大学生求助态度的相对贡献。数据收集自395名就读于美国高等教育机构的大学生。层次多元回归分析显示,所有被测因素对求助态度均有显著影响,其中自我耻辱感是最显著的预测因子,其次是负面网络取向、公共耻辱感和抑郁。完整的模型解释了66.2%的求助态度差异。人口因素解释了13.6%的差异,在最终的模型中,女性、性别非二元/非一致性和双性/多种族学生报告了更积极的寻求帮助的态度。这些发现强调了形成求助态度的因素之间复杂的相互作用,并强调了针对社会支持网络的污名化和负面认知的干预措施对提高大学生心理健康服务利用率的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Navigating the help-seeking maze: Examining stigma, depression, and negative network orientation in college students' help-seeking attitudes.","authors":"Da Hwin Kim, Linda G Castillo","doi":"10.1037/ort0000889","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>College students face significant mental health challenges, yet many are reluctant to seek professional mental health help. This study examined the relative contributions of public stigma, self-stigma, depression, and negative network orientation to help-seeking attitudes among college students, controlling for demographic factors. Data were collected from 395 college students enrolled in U.S. postsecondary institutions. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that all examined factors significantly influenced help-seeking attitudes, with self-stigma emerging as the strongest predictor, followed by negative network orientation, public stigma, and depression. The full model accounted for 66.2% of the variance in help-seeking attitudes. Demographic factors explained 13.6% of the variance, with women, gender nonbinary/nonconforming, and bi/multiracial students reporting more positive attitudes toward seeking help in the final model. These findings underscore the complex interplay of factors shaping help-seeking attitudes and emphasize the importance of interventions targeting stigma and negative perceptions of social support networks to improve mental health service utilization among college students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Systemic social oppression is a chronic, complex, transmissible, and cumulative source of collective trauma that targets groups of people based on shared identities and experiences. While various disciplines rely on collective trauma as a theoretical framework to elaborate on the pervasive impacts of systemic oppression, other disciplines allude to the study and measurement of this phenomenon but neglect to characterize it under this specific framework. Without fully integrating these multidisciplinary perspectives and developing reliable methods of experimentation and data collection, researchers will remain limited in their ability to provide a truly holistic perspective of collective trauma's impact on the health and well-being of marginalized communities. This integrative, interdisciplinary analysis draws from various disciplines to define and conceptualize collective trauma resulting from systemic social oppression. Furthermore, this article seeks to explore how collective trauma contributes to inequities in health and social conditions among historically marginalized groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
系统性的社会压迫是一种慢性的、复杂的、可传播的和累积的集体创伤来源,它针对的是基于共同身份和经历的人群。虽然各种学科依赖集体创伤作为理论框架来阐述系统性压迫的普遍影响,但其他学科暗示了对这一现象的研究和测量,但忽视了在这一特定框架下对其进行表征。如果不充分整合这些多学科的观点,不开发可靠的实验和数据收集方法,研究人员就无法真正全面地了解集体创伤对边缘化社区的健康和福祉的影响。这种综合的、跨学科的分析借鉴了不同学科来定义和概念化由系统性社会压迫引起的集体创伤。此外,本文试图探讨集体创伤如何导致历史上边缘化群体的健康和社会条件不平等。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Situating systemic social oppression as collective trauma: An interdisciplinary analysis.","authors":"Chelsea A Allen","doi":"10.1037/ort0000887","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic social oppression is a chronic, complex, transmissible, and cumulative source of <i>collective trauma</i> that targets groups of people based on shared identities and experiences. While various disciplines rely on <i>collective trauma</i> as a theoretical framework to elaborate on the pervasive impacts of systemic oppression, other disciplines allude to the study and measurement of this phenomenon but neglect to characterize it under this specific framework. Without fully integrating these multidisciplinary perspectives and developing reliable methods of experimentation and data collection, researchers will remain limited in their ability to provide a truly holistic perspective of <i>collective trauma</i>'s impact on the health and well-being of marginalized communities. This integrative, interdisciplinary analysis draws from various disciplines to define and conceptualize <i>collective trauma</i> resulting from systemic social oppression. Furthermore, this article seeks to explore how <i>collective trauma</i> contributes to inequities in health and social conditions among historically marginalized groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Prior research suggests that immigrant generation, perceived discrimination, and identity shape Muslim American immigrants' mental health, but these factors have rarely been examined simultaneously, especially not while comparing different immigrant generations of Muslim Americans directly to each other and to Muslim Americans with no recent history of immigration. We examined the relationships between these factors and depression and anxiety symptoms in a sample of 157 Muslim American college students (range = 17-48; Mage = 21.16, SD = 3.69; 75.2% female; immigrant generations: 23.6% first, 54.1% second, and 22.3% third or later generations; region of origin: 65.6% Arab or Middle Eastern, 19.2% Southeast Asian, 6.4% sub-Saharan African or Caribbean, 5.6% European, and 3.2% South or Central American). These students were primarily recruited through announcements in relevant classes and student organizations to complete an online survey that included a question on their birthplace and their parents' birthplace as well as measures of perceived discrimination (General Ethnic Discrimination Scale), Muslim identity (Multigroup Ethnic Identity Scale), depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). We conducted path analytic models and tested the indirect effects of immigrant generation on depression and anxiety symptoms through perceived discrimination and Muslim American identity. Results showed that first- and third- or later-generation immigrants reported significantly lower perceived discrimination than second-generation immigrants, which in turn was linked to lower symptoms. Indirect effects via perceived discrimination were statistically significant, but those via identity were not. These results suggest that second-generation Muslim Americans are at heightened risk of psychological symptoms partly due to greater perceived discrimination and stress the need for clinical interventions and advocacy efforts targeting the high levels of discrimination that this group of students confronts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Immigrant generation and mental health among Muslim American youth: Pathways through perceived discrimination and Muslim American identity.","authors":"Jessica L Bonumwezi, Sally L Grapin, Sarah R Lowe","doi":"10.1037/ort0000880","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research suggests that immigrant generation, perceived discrimination, and identity shape Muslim American immigrants' mental health, but these factors have rarely been examined simultaneously, especially not while comparing different immigrant generations of Muslim Americans directly to each other and to Muslim Americans with no recent history of immigration. We examined the relationships between these factors and depression and anxiety symptoms in a sample of 157 Muslim American college students (range = 17-48; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 21.16, SD = 3.69; 75.2% female; immigrant generations: 23.6% first, 54.1% second, and 22.3% third or later generations; region of origin: 65.6% Arab or Middle Eastern, 19.2% Southeast Asian, 6.4% sub-Saharan African or Caribbean, 5.6% European, and 3.2% South or Central American). These students were primarily recruited through announcements in relevant classes and student organizations to complete an online survey that included a question on their birthplace and their parents' birthplace as well as measures of perceived discrimination (General Ethnic Discrimination Scale), Muslim identity (Multigroup Ethnic Identity Scale), depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). We conducted path analytic models and tested the indirect effects of immigrant generation on depression and anxiety symptoms through perceived discrimination and Muslim American identity. Results showed that first- and third- or later-generation immigrants reported significantly lower perceived discrimination than second-generation immigrants, which in turn was linked to lower symptoms. Indirect effects via perceived discrimination were statistically significant, but those via identity were not. These results suggest that second-generation Muslim Americans are at heightened risk of psychological symptoms partly due to greater perceived discrimination and stress the need for clinical interventions and advocacy efforts targeting the high levels of discrimination that this group of students confronts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145193925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nick Kerman, Amanda Noble, Sean A Kidd, Carrie Anne Marshall, Vicky Stergiopoulos
Service restrictions involve people experiencing homelessness being banned from an emergency shelter in response to a violation of program policies. Their use can be a pathway into unsheltered homelessness and reliance on other institutional services. However, the prevalence of service restriction use and the perspectives of shelter staff toward the practice are unknown. Accordingly, this mixed methods study used a one-phase QUAL(quan) embedded design to examine the reasons for implementing service restrictions, as recorded by shelter staff in administrative data and their perceptions of the practice, with a focus on impacts. Two sources of data were used: (a) semistructured interviews with 30 staff working in shelters in Toronto, Canada, and (b) administrative data from 2014 to 2021 on the reasons for service restriction issuance across Toronto's shelter system. Assault and threatening or violent behavior were common reasons for service restriction and had increased in recent years. Despite the prevalence of their use, service restrictions were perceived as a necessity ("necessary evil") by shelter staff but could also challenge and unsettle staff due to the potential for further harms to people experiencing homelessness ("making a homeless person even more homeless"). Improving violence prevention approaches, developing alternative responses for nonviolent behaviors that violate shelter policies, and implementing training and support interventions to enhance workplace mental health and wellness among shelter staff could address underlying issues linked to service restrictions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
服务限制涉及因违反方案政策而禁止无家可归者进入紧急避难所。它们的使用可能导致无家可归和依赖其他机构服务。然而,服务限制使用的普遍程度以及收容所工作人员对这种做法的看法尚不清楚。因此,这项混合方法研究使用了一阶段质量评估(全)嵌入式设计来检查实施服务限制的原因,这些原因由收容所工作人员在行政数据中记录,以及他们对这种做法的看法,重点是影响。使用了两个数据来源:(a)对加拿大多伦多收容所的30名工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,以及(b) 2014年至2021年关于整个多伦多收容所系统发放服务限制原因的行政数据。攻击、威胁或暴力行为是限制服役的常见原因,近年来这种情况有所增加。尽管服务限制的使用很普遍,但收容所工作人员认为这是必要的(“必要之恶”),但也可能对工作人员造成挑战和不安,因为这可能对无家可归的人造成进一步伤害(“使无家可归的人更加无家可归”)。改进暴力预防方法,为违反收容所政策的非暴力行为制定替代对策,实施培训和支助干预措施,以加强收容所工作人员的工作场所心理健康和健康,这些都可以解决与服务限制有关的根本问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"\"Making a homeless person even more homeless … it's a necessary evil\": The health and safety complexities of service restrictions as perceived by emergency shelter staff.","authors":"Nick Kerman, Amanda Noble, Sean A Kidd, Carrie Anne Marshall, Vicky Stergiopoulos","doi":"10.1037/ort0000882","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Service restrictions involve people experiencing homelessness being banned from an emergency shelter in response to a violation of program policies. Their use can be a pathway into unsheltered homelessness and reliance on other institutional services. However, the prevalence of service restriction use and the perspectives of shelter staff toward the practice are unknown. Accordingly, this mixed methods study used a one-phase QUAL(quan) embedded design to examine the reasons for implementing service restrictions, as recorded by shelter staff in administrative data and their perceptions of the practice, with a focus on impacts. Two sources of data were used: (a) semistructured interviews with 30 staff working in shelters in Toronto, Canada, and (b) administrative data from 2014 to 2021 on the reasons for service restriction issuance across Toronto's shelter system. Assault and threatening or violent behavior were common reasons for service restriction and had increased in recent years. Despite the prevalence of their use, service restrictions were perceived as a necessity (\"necessary evil\") by shelter staff but could also challenge and unsettle staff due to the potential for further harms to people experiencing homelessness (\"making a homeless person even more homeless\"). Improving violence prevention approaches, developing alternative responses for nonviolent behaviors that violate shelter policies, and implementing training and support interventions to enhance workplace mental health and wellness among shelter staff could address underlying issues linked to service restrictions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rob Eschmann, Barry Pousman, Dawn Belkin-Martinez, Kelsey G Reeder, Noor Toraif, Maya Kido Stevenson
Social justice is a value central to the social work profession and paramount for scholars and practitioners invested in public behavioral health. How can social workers and behavioral health researchers and practitioners approach practice, often dealing with personal and individual-level issues, while maintaining a systemic antioppressive and social justice-oriented focus? In this article, we present a model for leveraging emerging technologies to engage behavioral health practitioners and researchers in antioppressive behavioral health practices and generate technology-based training modules. We explore an experimental course taught at a school of social work that engaged participatory design methodologies to (a) introduce students to an antioppressive social work practice model centering institutional, cultural, and societal barriers to wellness (including racism, classism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and ageism), (b) explore immersive storytelling for social impact and the costs and affordances of emerging technologies, and (c) empower students to design and create their own virtual reality experiences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
社会公正是社会工作专业的核心价值,对于投资于公共行为健康的学者和从业者来说是至关重要的。社会工作者和行为健康研究人员和从业人员如何处理实践,经常处理个人和个人层面的问题,同时保持系统的反压迫和社会正义导向的重点?在本文中,我们提出了一个利用新兴技术让行为健康从业者和研究人员参与反压迫行为健康实践的模型,并生成基于技术的培训模块。我们探索了一门在社会工作学院教授的实验课程,该课程采用参与式设计方法(a)向学生介绍一种反压迫的社会工作实践模式,该模式以制度、文化和社会健康障碍为中心(包括种族主义、阶级歧视、性别歧视、同性恋恐惧症、变性恐惧症、残疾歧视和年龄歧视),(b)探索沉浸式故事的社会影响以及新兴技术的成本和可负担性。(c)使学生能够设计和创造自己的虚拟现实体验。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Storytelling for social change: Using emerging technology to develop antioppressive social work training and practice.","authors":"Rob Eschmann, Barry Pousman, Dawn Belkin-Martinez, Kelsey G Reeder, Noor Toraif, Maya Kido Stevenson","doi":"10.1037/ort0000861","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social justice is a value central to the social work profession and paramount for scholars and practitioners invested in public behavioral health. How can social workers and behavioral health researchers and practitioners approach practice, often dealing with personal and individual-level issues, while maintaining a systemic antioppressive and social justice-oriented focus? In this article, we present a model for leveraging emerging technologies to engage behavioral health practitioners and researchers in antioppressive behavioral health practices and generate technology-based training modules. We explore an experimental course taught at a school of social work that engaged participatory design methodologies to (a) introduce students to an antioppressive social work practice model centering institutional, cultural, and societal barriers to wellness (including racism, classism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and ageism), (b) explore immersive storytelling for social impact and the costs and affordances of emerging technologies, and (c) empower students to design and create their own virtual reality experiences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There is wide recognition that contact with parents while in residential care settings (RCSs) is beneficial for children. Yet, some barriers limit parental involvement. Research often overlooks parents' perspectives, focusing often on administrative data and professionals' reports. This study explored the experiences of parents whose children reside in educational RCSs for youth from underprivileged backgrounds, highlighting parent-child relations, parental involvement, and factors that hinder or promote parents' participation. The study utilized in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with 33 parents of youth (aged 12-18) from 11 Israeli RCSs. A thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted to identify themes and subthemes describing the parents' experiences and insights. Two key themes emerged (a) the state of the parent-child relationship during the child's stay in the RCS, including the transition to the facility; and (b) parental involvement at the RCS, including both proactive involvement initiated by the parents and involvement facilitated by staff, as well as the barriers to and facilitators of this involvement. The main barriers include staff's low availability, passivity, alienation, as well as high turnover; the children's demanding schedule; and the family's socioeconomic challenges, geographic distance, and internal conflicts. Main facilitators include a collaborative staff approach, positive child-staff relationships, parental empowerment, and holistic staff partnerships. The study emphasized the need for policies that actively involve parents in RCSs and recognize them as key sources of knowledge about their children; and the importance of staff training to improve parental engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人们普遍认识到,在寄宿照料环境(RCSs)中与父母接触对儿童有益。然而,一些障碍限制了父母的参与。研究往往忽略了家长的观点,往往把重点放在行政数据和专业人士的报告上。本研究探讨了贫困青少年教育社区的父母体验,重点探讨了亲子关系、父母参与以及阻碍或促进父母参与的因素。该研究对来自11个以色列rcs的33名青少年(12-18岁)父母进行了深入的半结构化定性访谈。对访谈进行主题分析,以确定描述父母经历和见解的主题和副主题。出现了两个关键主题(a)儿童在RCS逗留期间的亲子关系状况,包括过渡到该设施;(b)家长在RCS的参与,包括家长主动发起的参与和工作人员推动的参与,以及这种参与的障碍和促进因素。主要障碍包括员工的低可用性、被动性、疏离性和高流动率;孩子们紧张的日程安排;以及家庭的社会经济挑战、地理距离和内部冲突。主要的促进因素包括工作人员合作方式、积极的儿童与工作人员关系、家长赋权和全面的工作人员伙伴关系。该研究强调需要制定政策,使父母积极参与儿童社区活动,并承认他们是了解其子女的主要来源;员工培训对提高家长参与度的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"\"Just because she's there doesn't mean she is parentless\": Parental perspectives on involvement and contact with their children in educational residential care for youth from underprivileged backgrounds.","authors":"Efrat Lusky-Weisrose, Shalhevet Attar-Schwartz","doi":"10.1037/ort0000877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is wide recognition that contact with parents while in residential care settings (RCSs) is beneficial for children. Yet, some barriers limit parental involvement. Research often overlooks parents' perspectives, focusing often on administrative data and professionals' reports. This study explored the experiences of parents whose children reside in educational RCSs for youth from underprivileged backgrounds, highlighting parent-child relations, parental involvement, and factors that hinder or promote parents' participation. The study utilized in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with 33 parents of youth (aged 12-18) from 11 Israeli RCSs. A thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted to identify themes and subthemes describing the parents' experiences and insights. Two key themes emerged (a) the state of the parent-child relationship during the child's stay in the RCS, including the transition to the facility; and (b) parental involvement at the RCS, including both proactive involvement initiated by the parents and involvement facilitated by staff, as well as the barriers to and facilitators of this involvement. The main barriers include staff's low availability, passivity, alienation, as well as high turnover; the children's demanding schedule; and the family's socioeconomic challenges, geographic distance, and internal conflicts. Main facilitators include a collaborative staff approach, positive child-staff relationships, parental empowerment, and holistic staff partnerships. The study emphasized the need for policies that actively involve parents in RCSs and recognize them as key sources of knowledge about their children; and the importance of staff training to improve parental engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Isabella Kakish, Ana Gomez-Carrillo, Rachel Kronick
The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with increased diagnoses of psychiatric disorders and a rise in psychiatric hospitalizations in children and youth in Canada. The collateral effects of the pandemic on children and youth have been well documented in many domains. However, the impact of pandemic restrictions in child and youth psychiatric inpatient milieux has been largely ignored. This study aimed to understand youth and families' experiences of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization in Canada during the height of the pandemic (2020-2022). We conducted focus groups with youth and family members. Our findings highlight that youth and their kin experienced multiple forms of deprivation, including physical isolation and separation from family. Participants were unanimous in reporting that quality of care was significantly compromised, which they felt led to poorer outcomes. We reflect on the challenges of preserving the relational components of care in a time of crisis, the carcerality of COVID-19 isolation practices, and how the turn toward risk management culture was met with resistance and distrust by youth and their families. We discuss how many findings are reflective of trends in inpatient care overall, not only in times of crisis, and suggest that COVID-19 may have brought into focus fault lines that require a rethinking of child and youth inpatient practices. Nonetheless, the insights from this study can help with guiding policy in future crises, including involving children and families in policy development, reducing potentially traumatizing practices of quarantine and isolation, and maintaining flexibility when applying restrictive regulations to youth mental health patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,加拿大精神疾病的诊断增加,儿童和青少年精神疾病住院治疗人数增加。这一大流行病对儿童和青年的附带影响在许多领域都有充分的记录。然而,流行病限制对儿童和青少年精神病住院环境的影响在很大程度上被忽视了。本研究旨在了解加拿大在大流行高峰期(2020-2022年)的青少年和家庭住院精神病患者的经历。我们与青少年和家庭成员进行了焦点小组讨论。我们的研究结果强调,青少年及其亲属经历了多种形式的剥夺,包括身体隔离和与家人分离。参与者一致报告说,护理质量受到严重损害,他们认为这导致了较差的结果。我们思考了在危机时期保持护理的相关组成部分所面临的挑战,COVID-19隔离做法的残忍性,以及转向风险管理文化如何遭到青年及其家人的抵制和不信任。我们讨论了有多少调查结果反映了住院治疗的总体趋势,而不仅仅是在危机时期,并提出COVID-19可能已经关注到需要重新思考儿童和青少年住院治疗实践的断层线。尽管如此,这项研究的见解可以帮助指导未来危机中的政策,包括让儿童和家庭参与政策制定,减少可能造成创伤的隔离和隔离做法,以及在对青少年精神健康患者实施限制性规定时保持灵活性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"At what cost? A qualitative study of youth and families' experiences of psychiatric hospitalization in Canada at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Isabella Kakish, Ana Gomez-Carrillo, Rachel Kronick","doi":"10.1037/ort0000865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000865","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with increased diagnoses of psychiatric disorders and a rise in psychiatric hospitalizations in children and youth in Canada. The collateral effects of the pandemic on children and youth have been well documented in many domains. However, the impact of pandemic restrictions in child and youth psychiatric inpatient milieux has been largely ignored. This study aimed to understand youth and families' experiences of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization in Canada during the height of the pandemic (2020-2022). We conducted focus groups with youth and family members. Our findings highlight that youth and their kin experienced multiple forms of deprivation, including physical isolation and separation from family. Participants were unanimous in reporting that quality of care was significantly compromised, which they felt led to poorer outcomes. We reflect on the challenges of preserving the relational components of care in a time of crisis, the carcerality of COVID-19 isolation practices, and how the turn toward risk management culture was met with resistance and distrust by youth and their families. We discuss how many findings are reflective of trends in inpatient care overall, not only in times of crisis, and suggest that COVID-19 may have brought into focus fault lines that require a rethinking of child and youth inpatient practices. Nonetheless, the insights from this study can help with guiding policy in future crises, including involving children and families in policy development, reducing potentially traumatizing practices of quarantine and isolation, and maintaining flexibility when applying restrictive regulations to youth mental health patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this exploratory study, we examined the future orientation of young adult Arabs in Israel, considering their sociocultural context and the ongoing sociopolitical tensions exacerbated by the October 7 events. Future orientation, defined as individuals' perceptions, aspirations, and plans for their future, plays a critical role in personal development and goal achievement. However, little research has focused on how discrimination, ethnonational identity, and political conflict shape future orientation among young adult Arabs in Israel. Through in-depth interviews with 34 participants aged 18-31, we identified six distinct profiles of self-perception related to future orientation: the ideal self, the belonging self, the confused self, the discriminated self, the fearful and alert self, and the determined self. While some young adults displayed resilience and determination, others expressed confusion, fear, or feelings of exclusion due to systemic oppression and sociopolitical instability. The findings underscore the complex interplay of personal, cultural, and sociopolitical factors in shaping future orientation, particularly under conditions of insidious trauma and conflict. We propose a trauma-informed approach to understanding and addressing future orientation among minority groups in conflict zones. Implications for practice include culturally sensitive interventions and resilience-building programs that empower young adults to navigate systemic barriers and realize their aspirations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在这项探索性研究中,我们考察了以色列阿拉伯青年的未来取向,考虑到他们的社会文化背景和10月7日事件加剧的持续的社会政治紧张局势。未来取向,定义为个人对未来的感知、愿望和计划,在个人发展和目标实现中起着至关重要的作用。然而,很少有研究关注歧视、民族认同和政治冲突如何影响以色列阿拉伯青年的未来取向。通过对34名年龄在18-31岁之间的参与者的深度访谈,我们确定了与未来取向相关的六种不同的自我感知形象:理想自我、归属感自我、困惑自我、歧视自我、恐惧和警觉自我以及坚定自我。虽然一些年轻人表现出适应力和决心,但由于系统性压迫和社会政治不稳定,其他人表现出困惑、恐惧或被排斥的感觉。研究结果强调了个人、文化和社会政治因素在塑造未来方向方面的复杂相互作用,特别是在潜在的创伤和冲突的情况下。我们提出了一种创伤知情的方法来理解和解决冲突地区少数群体的未来方向。对实践的影响包括对文化敏感的干预措施和复原力建设项目,使年轻人能够克服体制障碍并实现自己的愿望。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Future orientation among young adult Arabs in Israel following the October 7 events.","authors":"Haneen Karram-Elias, Yafit Sulimani-Aidan","doi":"10.1037/ort0000878","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this exploratory study, we examined the future orientation of young adult Arabs in Israel, considering their sociocultural context and the ongoing sociopolitical tensions exacerbated by the October 7 events. Future orientation, defined as individuals' perceptions, aspirations, and plans for their future, plays a critical role in personal development and goal achievement. However, little research has focused on how discrimination, ethnonational identity, and political conflict shape future orientation among young adult Arabs in Israel. Through in-depth interviews with 34 participants aged 18-31, we identified six distinct profiles of self-perception related to future orientation: the ideal self, the belonging self, the confused self, the discriminated self, the fearful and alert self, and the determined self. While some young adults displayed resilience and determination, others expressed confusion, fear, or feelings of exclusion due to systemic oppression and sociopolitical instability. The findings underscore the complex interplay of personal, cultural, and sociopolitical factors in shaping future orientation, particularly under conditions of insidious trauma and conflict. We propose a trauma-informed approach to understanding and addressing future orientation among minority groups in conflict zones. Implications for practice include culturally sensitive interventions and resilience-building programs that empower young adults to navigate systemic barriers and realize their aspirations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Based on 814 3- to 4-year-olds (408 girls; Han Chinese: 97.5%) from Wuhan and Zhengzhou, two cities in China affected by COVID-19 to varying degrees, this study examined the impact of COVID-19 and lockdowns on children's emotional distress and its underlying family-level mechanisms. Children living in a city with "high-load" coronavirus and lockdown (Wuhan) exhibited more symptoms of anxiety/withdrawal, fear, and acting out than their counterparts living in a city with "low loads" (Zhengzhou; ds = .29∼.35). The differences were explained by differences in primary caregivers' worries about health and basic resources (e.g., food) between Wuhan and Zhengzhou (ds = .45∼.61). The findings highlight the importance of incorporating the impact of lockdowns on children and families in policy making in the context of a public health emergency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A tale of two cities: Examining the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on young children's emotional distress.","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Nan Xiao","doi":"10.1037/ort0000881","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on 814 3- to 4-year-olds (408 girls; Han Chinese: 97.5%) from Wuhan and Zhengzhou, two cities in China affected by COVID-19 to varying degrees, this study examined the impact of COVID-19 and lockdowns on children's emotional distress and its underlying family-level mechanisms. Children living in a city with \"high-load\" coronavirus and lockdown (Wuhan) exhibited more symptoms of anxiety/withdrawal, fear, and acting out than their counterparts living in a city with \"low loads\" (Zhengzhou; <i>d</i>s = .29∼.35). The differences were explained by differences in primary caregivers' worries about health and basic resources (e.g., food) between Wuhan and Zhengzhou (<i>d</i>s = .45∼.61). The findings highlight the importance of incorporating the impact of lockdowns on children and families in policy making in the context of a public health emergency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hamish A Gunn, Karen L Suyemoto, Jae A Puckett, David W Pantalone
Misgendering is a common and distressing experience for many transgender (trans) and gender diverse people. Although existing research (e.g., McLemore, 2015, 2018) suggests that being misgendered is negatively associated with mental health, the empirical literature on misgendering is currently nascent. In the present study, we examined how trans and gender diverse people experienced and negotiated being misgendered. Guided by a constructivist grounded theory framework with a critical-ideological lens (Cresswell, 2007; Ponterotto, 2005), we conducted and analyzed 14 semistructured interviews using a constant comparative approach, including internal and external auditing and member check interviews. Participants' experiences of misgendering were influenced by several contextual factors, both temporary and long-standing, and in both personal and environmental spheres. Participants described and differentiated the experiences and effects of misgendering from accidental to intentional. Participants also described the decision-making process and response possibilities subsequent to misgendering-which could be influenced both by their initial reaction to being misgendered and by contextual factors-and could then correct or not correct the misgendering. Depending on how they reacted and responded, experiences of misgendering had short- and long-term consequences for many participants. Thematic results were integrated into a model of the experience of negotiating being misgendered. Participants' experiences indicate that misgendering is a significant minority stressor and highlight ways in which others can support trans and gender diverse individuals in navigating this experience to minimize the negative impact on well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
对许多跨性别者(trans)和性别多元化的人来说,性别混淆是一种常见而痛苦的经历。尽管现有研究(例如,McLemore, 2015年,2018年)表明性别错误与心理健康呈负相关,但关于性别错误的实证文献目前尚不成熟。在本研究中,我们研究了跨性别者和不同性别者是如何经历和处理被错误性别的。在建构主义理论框架和批判意识形态视角的指导下(Cresswell, 2007;Ponterotto, 2005),我们使用持续的比较方法进行并分析了14个半结构化访谈,包括内部和外部审计以及成员检查访谈。参与者的性别误解经历受到若干背景因素的影响,这些因素有暂时的,也有长期的,既有个人方面的,也有环境方面的。参与者描述并区分了从偶然到故意的性别错误的经历和影响。参与者还描述了错误性别之后的决策过程和反应可能性——这可能受到他们对错误性别的最初反应和环境因素的影响——然后可以纠正或不纠正错误性别。根据他们的反应和回应,性别错误的经历对许多参与者有短期和长期的影响。专题结果被纳入一个谈判经验的模式,说明谈判的性别是错误的。参与者的经历表明,性别错误是少数群体的一个重要压力源,并强调了其他人可以支持跨性别者和性别多样化的个人度过这一经历,以尽量减少对幸福感的负面影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The experience of misgendering among transgender and gender diverse people.","authors":"Hamish A Gunn, Karen L Suyemoto, Jae A Puckett, David W Pantalone","doi":"10.1037/ort0000879","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ort0000879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Misgendering is a common and distressing experience for many transgender (trans) and gender diverse people. Although existing research (e.g., McLemore, 2015, 2018) suggests that being misgendered is negatively associated with mental health, the empirical literature on misgendering is currently nascent. In the present study, we examined how trans and gender diverse people experienced and negotiated being misgendered. Guided by a constructivist grounded theory framework with a critical-ideological lens (Cresswell, 2007; Ponterotto, 2005), we conducted and analyzed 14 semistructured interviews using a constant comparative approach, including internal and external auditing and member check interviews. Participants' experiences of misgendering were influenced by several contextual factors, both temporary and long-standing, and in both personal and environmental spheres. Participants described and differentiated the experiences and effects of misgendering from accidental to intentional. Participants also described the decision-making process and response possibilities subsequent to misgendering-which could be influenced both by their initial reaction to being misgendered and by contextual factors-and could then correct or not correct the misgendering. Depending on how they reacted and responded, experiences of misgendering had short- and long-term consequences for many participants. Thematic results were integrated into a model of the experience of negotiating being misgendered. Participants' experiences indicate that misgendering is a significant minority stressor and highlight ways in which others can support trans and gender diverse individuals in navigating this experience to minimize the negative impact on well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144800992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}