首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
A Journey Toward Therapeutic Change in Depression: An Early Career Scientific Autobiography 抑郁症治疗改变之旅:早期职业科学自传。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.005
Nili Solomonov Ph.D.
{"title":"A Journey Toward Therapeutic Change in Depression: An Early Career Scientific Autobiography","authors":"Nili Solomonov Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1358-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145093360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Current State of International Human Rights of Older Persons 《国际老年人人权现状》。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.004
Robert Kohn M.D.
The UN has produced various declarations addressing the human rights of older persons. The UN does not have a specific treaty or convention regarding human rights of older persons as part of its human rights system. Recently the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing has recommended to the General Assembly to adopt a binding convention on human rights for older persons. There has been progress already at the regional level. The European Convention of Human Rights Article 23 has been ratified by less than half the countries. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights is the first human rights instrument to include older persons as a distinct group. In November 2024 a protocol on older persons human rights was adopted. The Organization of American States adopted the Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons, the first human rights document specific to older persons and the only legally binding instrument. Although progress has been made on focusing on human rights on older persons, a binding UN international convention on human rights of older persons would be a tool to improve dignified mental healthcare.
联合国就老年人的人权问题发表了各种宣言。联合国没有将老年人人权作为其人权体系一部分的具体条约或公约。最近,老龄问题不限成员名额工作组建议大会通过一项关于老年人人权的具有约束力的公约。在区域一级已经取得了进展。《欧洲人权公约》第23条只有不到一半的国家批准。《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》是第一个将老年人作为一个独特群体纳入的人权文书。2024年11月,通过了一项关于老年人人权的议定书。美洲国家组织通过了《美洲保护老年人人权公约》,这是第一份专门针对老年人的人权文件,也是唯一具有法律约束力的文书。虽然在注重老年人的人权方面取得了进展,但一项具有约束力的联合国老年人人权国际公约将是改善有尊严的精神保健的工具。
{"title":"The Current State of International Human Rights of Older Persons","authors":"Robert Kohn M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The UN has produced various declarations addressing the human rights of older persons. The UN does not have a specific treaty or convention regarding human rights of older persons as part of its human rights system. Recently the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing has recommended to the General Assembly to adopt a binding convention on human rights for older persons. There has been progress already at the regional level. The European Convention of Human Rights Article 23 has been ratified by less than half the countries. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights is the first human rights instrument to include older persons as a distinct group. In November 2024 a protocol on older persons human rights was adopted. The Organization of American States adopted the Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons, the first human rights document specific to older persons and the only legally binding instrument. Although progress has been made on focusing on human rights on older persons, a binding UN international convention on human rights of older persons would be a tool to improve dignified mental healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1322-1330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145067575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability of Euthanasia for People With Dementia: Perspectives of Clinicians From Six Countries 痴呆症患者安乐死的可接受性:来自六个国家的临床医生的观点。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.003
Jingyuan Xu 须静媛 M.Sc. , Hanneke J.A. Smaling M.Sc., Ph.D. , Miharu Nakanishi Ph.D. , Shiri Shinan-Altman Ph.D. , Lukas Radbruch M.D. , Jan Gaertner M.D. , Wilco P. Achterberg M.D., Ph.D. , David R. Mehr M.D., M.S. , Jenny T. van der Steen M.Sc., Ph.D.

Objectives

Euthanasia for people with dementia is controversial and clinicians should decide how to respond to euthanasia requests. The authors aimed to investigate clinicians’ perspectives on the acceptability of euthanasia for people with dementia, and differences between countries and personal characteristics potentially associated with acceptability.

Design, Setting, Participants, Measurements

Cross-sectional vignette study as part of the CONT-END studies, in which the authors conducted interviews with clinicians from the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, USA, Japan, and Israel online or in-person, and logistic regression analyses to assess associations with acceptability.

Results

Participants included 202 physicians and three nurse specialists who assumed similar medical responsibilities. Acceptability was higher in the Netherlands (66%) than in other countries (23%–44%, OR 0.16–0.41, p = 0.003–0.03). Dutch clinicians were more often willing to perform euthanasia upon request of a person with dementia (58%) than clinicians in other countries (18%–34%, OR 0.16–0.17, p = 0.007–0.03), except for Israel (40%, OR 0.48, p = 0.07). Two coping styles, planning (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.59, 1.00]) and religious coping (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]), were associated with lower acceptability of euthanasia. Being religious (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.24, 0.93]), training in palliative care (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.26, 0.91]), and using emotional social support as coping style (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.62, 0.95]) were associated with lower willingness to perform euthanasia upon request of a person with dementia.

Conclusions

Clinicians’ perspectives on the acceptability of euthanasia for people with dementia varied across countries and individuals, with diversity related to coping styles, training in palliative care, and religion.
目的:对痴呆症患者实施安乐死是有争议的,临床医生应该决定如何应对安乐死请求。作者的目的是调查临床医生对痴呆症患者安乐死可接受性的看法,以及国家和个人特征之间可能与可接受性相关的差异。设计、设置、参与者、测量:作为contend研究的一部分,横断面小调查研究的作者对来自荷兰、瑞士、德国、美国、日本和以色列的临床医生进行了在线或面对面的访谈,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估与可接受性的关联。结果:参与者包括202名医生和3名承担类似医疗责任的专科护士。荷兰的可接受性(66%)高于其他国家(23%-44%,OR 0.16-0.41, p = 0.003-0.03)。荷兰的临床医生(58%)比其他国家的临床医生(18%-34%,OR 0.16-0.17, p = 0.007-0.03)更愿意在痴呆症患者的要求下实施安乐死,除了以色列(40%,OR 0.48, p = 0.07)。两种应对方式,计划(OR 0.77, 95% CI[0.59, 1.00])和宗教应对(OR 0.71, 95% CI[0.60, 0.84])与较低的安乐死可接受性相关。宗教信仰(OR 0.47, 95% CI[0.24, 0.93])、姑息治疗培训(OR 0.48, 95% CI[0.26, 0.91])和使用情感社会支持作为应对方式(OR 0.77, 95% CI[0.62, 0.95])与应痴呆症患者要求实施安乐死的意愿较低相关。结论:临床医生对痴呆症患者安乐死可接受性的看法因国家和个人而异,这种差异与应对方式、姑息治疗培训和宗教有关。
{"title":"Acceptability of Euthanasia for People With Dementia: Perspectives of Clinicians From Six Countries","authors":"Jingyuan Xu 须静媛 M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Hanneke J.A. Smaling M.Sc., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Miharu Nakanishi Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Shiri Shinan-Altman Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Lukas Radbruch M.D. ,&nbsp;Jan Gaertner M.D. ,&nbsp;Wilco P. Achterberg M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;David R. Mehr M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Jenny T. van der Steen M.Sc., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Euthanasia for people with dementia is controversial and clinicians should decide how to respond to euthanasia requests. The authors aimed to investigate clinicians’ perspectives on the acceptability of euthanasia for people with dementia, and differences between countries and personal characteristics potentially associated with acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, Participants, Measurements</h3><div>Cross-sectional vignette study as part of the CONT-END studies, in which the authors conducted interviews with clinicians from the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, USA, Japan, and Israel online or in-person, and logistic regression analyses to assess associations with acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants included 202 physicians and three nurse specialists who assumed similar medical responsibilities. Acceptability was higher in the Netherlands (66%) than in other countries (23%–44%, OR 0.16–0.41, p = 0.003–0.03). Dutch clinicians were more often willing to perform euthanasia upon request of a person with dementia (58%) than clinicians in other countries (18%–34%, OR 0.16–0.17, p <em>=</em> 0.007–0.03), except for Israel (40%, OR 0.48, p = 0.07). Two coping styles, planning (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.59, 1.00]) and religious coping (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]), were associated with lower acceptability of euthanasia. Being religious (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.24, 0.93]), training in palliative care (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.26, 0.91]), and using emotional social support as coping style (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.62, 0.95]) were associated with lower willingness to perform euthanasia upon request of a person with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clinicians’ perspectives on the acceptability of euthanasia for people with dementia varied across countries and individuals, with diversity related to coping styles, training in palliative care, and religion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1263-1274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145077080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ketamine and Esketamine for Late-Life Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability 氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗老年抑郁症:疗效、安全性和耐受性的系统评价。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.001
Ronesh Sukhdeo H.B.Sc. , Jocelyn K. Tamura M.D. , Christine E. Dri B.H.Sc. , Roger S. McIntyre M.D.
Ketamine has emerged as a promising treatment for major depression, though its efficacy and safety remain incompletely characterized in older adults. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence for ketamine in geriatric depression. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted. Prospective clinical trials were included, with age restriction to participants ≥60 years applied at full-text review to capture subgroup data. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 757 adults. Studies examined intranasal (n = 5), intravenous (n = 4), subcutaneous (n = 1), and oral (n = 1) ketamine formulations, as well as ketamine combined with ECT (n = 2). Antidepressant efficacy findings were mixed; with preliminary findings of symptomatic improvement in this difficult to treat disease state, although not all studies reported out positive outcomes. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and discontinuation due to side effects was rare. Cognitive outcomes were mostly stable or improved, though long-term studies noted small declines in reaction time. Ketamine as an ECT anesthetic did not enhance antidepressant outcomes. Evidence certainty was very low to low; findings were limited by small samples, open-label designs, and inconsistent age-stratified reporting.
氯胺酮已成为治疗重度抑郁症的一种很有希望的方法,尽管其在老年人中的有效性和安全性尚未完全确定。本系统综述综合了氯胺酮治疗老年抑郁症的现有证据。检索PubMed, EMBASE和PsycINFO。纳入前瞻性临床试验,年龄限制为≥60岁,应用全文综述获取亚组数据。13项研究符合纳入标准,包括757名成年人。研究检查了经鼻(n = 5)、静脉(n = 4)、皮下(n = 1)和口服(n = 1)氯胺酮制剂,以及氯胺酮联合ECT (n = 2)。抗抑郁药的疗效结果好坏参半;尽管不是所有的研究都报告了积极的结果,但在这种难以治疗的疾病状态下,初步发现症状有所改善。不良事件一般为轻度至中度,因副作用而停药的情况很少见。认知结果大多稳定或有所改善,尽管长期研究发现反应时间略有下降。氯胺酮作为电痉挛麻醉剂并不能提高抗抑郁效果。证据确定性非常低到低;研究结果受到小样本、开放标签设计和不一致的年龄分层报告的限制。
{"title":"Ketamine and Esketamine for Late-Life Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability","authors":"Ronesh Sukhdeo H.B.Sc. ,&nbsp;Jocelyn K. Tamura M.D. ,&nbsp;Christine E. Dri B.H.Sc. ,&nbsp;Roger S. McIntyre M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ketamine has emerged as a promising treatment for major depression, though its efficacy and safety remain incompletely characterized in older adults. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence for ketamine in geriatric depression. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted. Prospective clinical trials were included, with age restriction to participants ≥60 years applied at full-text review to capture subgroup data. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 757 adults. Studies examined intranasal (n = 5), intravenous (n = 4), subcutaneous (n = 1), and oral (n = 1) ketamine formulations, as well as ketamine combined with ECT (n = 2). Antidepressant efficacy findings were mixed; with preliminary findings of symptomatic improvement in this difficult to treat disease state, although not all studies reported out positive outcomes. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and discontinuation due to side effects was rare. Cognitive outcomes were mostly stable or improved, though long-term studies noted small declines in reaction time. Ketamine as an ECT anesthetic did not enhance antidepressant outcomes. Evidence certainty was very low to low; findings were limited by small samples, open-label designs, and inconsistent age-stratified reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 84-102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflections on 50 Years of Teaching and Service: My Professional Life Story 反思50年的教学和服务:我的职业生涯故事。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.012
David Adler M.D.
{"title":"Reflections on 50 Years of Teaching and Service: My Professional Life Story","authors":"David Adler M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1354-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144986970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hearing Loss, Hearing Aid Use, and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Among Persons Living With Dementia: Findings From NACC 痴呆症患者的听力损失、助听器使用和神经精神症状:来自NACC的发现
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.007
Ahjeetha Shankar B.S. , Emmanuel E. Garcia Morales Ph.D. , Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos Ph.D., M.H.S. , Valerie T. Cotter Dr.N.P., C.R.N.P. , Milap A. Nowrangi M.D. , Sevil Yasar M.D., Ph.D. , Constantine G. Lyketsos M.D., M.H.S. , Esther S. Oh M.D., Ph.D. , Carrie L. Nieman M.D., M.P.H.

Objective

Hearing loss is a common comorbidity among persons living with dementia (PLWD), affecting >90% of individuals. Sensory impairments have been associated with an increased risk of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), while hearing aid use may be protective.

Method

We analyzed cross sectional data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Uniform Data Set. We estimated the association between functional hearing loss and number or severity of NPS in a negative binomial regression with robust variance adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. In the subsample with hearing loss, we estimated the association between hearing aid use and number or severity of NPS. Selection bias for hearing aid use was addressed using nearest neighbor matching (NNM) based on respondent demographic characteristics.

Result

10,054 participants were included with a mean age of 75 (SD 8) years. 2,416 (24%) self-reported functional hearing loss with 3.4 (standard deviation [SD] 2.5) mean total number of NPS and mean NPS severity of 5.1 (SD 4.9). In fully adjusted models, hearing loss was not associated with more NPS (predicted prevalence difference (PPD):0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.06,0.25) or more severe (PPD = 0.25; 95% CI:-0.06,0.56) NPS. In PLWD reporting hearing loss, 1,325 (54.8%) reported hearing aid use. After well-balanced matching, in adjusted models, hearing aid use was associated with fewer (PPD:-0.71; 95% CI:-0.93,-0.50) and less severe NPS (PPD:-1.79; 95% CI:-2.23,-1.34).

Conclusion

Hearing aid use may represent an underutilized, nonpharmacological intervention to address NPS. These findings suggest that hearing care may represent a promising nonpharmacological strategy to explore in managing NPS.
目的:听力损失是老年痴呆症患者的常见合并症,影响了90%的患者。感觉障碍与神经精神症状(NPS)的风险增加有关,而助听器的使用可能具有保护作用。方法我们分析了来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集的横截面数据。我们在负二项回归中估计了功能性听力损失与NPS数量或严重程度之间的关联,并根据人口统计学和临床特征进行了稳健方差调整。在听力损失的子样本中,我们估计了助听器使用与NPS数量或严重程度之间的关系。使用基于被调查者人口学特征的最近邻匹配(NNM)来解决助听器使用的选择偏差。结果10054名参与者入组,平均年龄75岁(SD 8)。2416例(24%)自报功能性听力损失,平均NPS总数3.4例(标准差[SD] 2.5),平均NPS严重程度5.1例(SD 4.9)。在完全调整的模型中,听力损失与更多的NPS无关(预测患病率差异(PPD):0.09;95%置信区间(CI):-0.06,0.25)或更严重(PPD = 0.25; 95% CI:-0.06,0.56) NPS。在报告听力损失的PLWD中,1325人(54.8%)报告使用助听器。经过良好的平衡匹配后,在调整后的模型中,助听器的使用与较低的NPS (PPD:-0.71; 95% CI:-0.93,-0.50)和较轻的NPS (PPD:-1.79; 95% CI:-2.23,-1.34)相关。结论使用助听器可能是一种未充分利用的非药物干预措施。这些发现表明,听力保健可能是一种有前途的非药物治疗NPS的策略。
{"title":"Hearing Loss, Hearing Aid Use, and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Among Persons Living With Dementia: Findings From NACC","authors":"Ahjeetha Shankar B.S. ,&nbsp;Emmanuel E. Garcia Morales Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos Ph.D., M.H.S. ,&nbsp;Valerie T. Cotter Dr.N.P., C.R.N.P. ,&nbsp;Milap A. Nowrangi M.D. ,&nbsp;Sevil Yasar M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Constantine G. Lyketsos M.D., M.H.S. ,&nbsp;Esther S. Oh M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Carrie L. Nieman M.D., M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Hearing loss is a common comorbidity among persons living with dementia (PLWD), affecting &gt;90% of individuals. Sensory impairments have been associated with an increased risk of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), while hearing aid use may be protective.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We analyzed cross sectional data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Uniform Data Set. We estimated the association between functional hearing loss and number or severity of NPS in a negative binomial regression with robust variance adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. In the subsample with hearing loss, we estimated the association between hearing aid use and number or severity of NPS. Selection bias for hearing aid use was addressed using nearest neighbor matching (NNM) based on respondent demographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>10,054 participants were included with a mean age of 75 (SD 8) years. 2,416 (24%) self-reported functional hearing loss with 3.4 (standard deviation [SD] 2.5) mean total number of NPS and mean NPS severity of 5.1 (SD 4.9). In fully adjusted models, hearing loss was not associated with more NPS (predicted prevalence difference (PPD):0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.06,0.25) or more severe (PPD = 0.25; 95% CI:-0.06,0.56) NPS. In PLWD reporting hearing loss, 1,325 (54.8%) reported hearing aid use. After well-balanced matching, in adjusted models, hearing aid use was associated with fewer (PPD:-0.71; 95% CI:-0.93,-0.50) and less severe NPS (PPD:-1.79; 95% CI:-2.23,-1.34).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Hearing aid use may represent an underutilized, nonpharmacological intervention to address NPS. These findings suggest that hearing care may represent a promising nonpharmacological strategy to explore in managing NPS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 11","pages":"Pages 1230-1239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Woodstock Generation has a Smartphone: Can Communication About Psychedelic Therapy Affect the Willingness on the Part of Older People to Attempt Treatment? 伍德斯托克音乐节的一代有了智能手机:关于迷幻疗法的交流是否会影响老年人尝试治疗的意愿?
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.016
Philip D. Harvey Ph.D.
{"title":"The Woodstock Generation has a Smartphone: Can Communication About Psychedelic Therapy Affect the Willingness on the Part of Older People to Attempt Treatment?","authors":"Philip D. Harvey Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 12","pages":"Pages 1260-1262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144986961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to “The Evidence Base for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Geriatric Depression” 对“电痉挛疗法(ECT)治疗老年抑郁症的证据基础”的回应。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.015
Tor Arnison Ph.D. , Axel Nordenskjöld M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Response to “The Evidence Base for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Geriatric Depression”","authors":"Tor Arnison Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Axel Nordenskjöld M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 136-137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144986956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contact 联系
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.011
David L. Coulter M.D.
{"title":"Contact","authors":"David L. Coulter M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 11","pages":"Pages 1247-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In-Basket Notes to Increase Recognition of Mild Cognitive Impairment 提高对轻度认知障碍的认识。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.005
Barry W. Rovner M.D., Robin J. Casten Ph.D.
{"title":"In-Basket Notes to Increase Recognition of Mild Cognitive Impairment","authors":"Barry W. Rovner M.D.,&nbsp;Robin J. Casten Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 252-253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144877959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1