This study assessed the ability of Twisted File Adaptive (TFA), TruNatomy (TRN) and VDW.Rotate (VR) instruments activated by continuous rotation (CR) and adaptive motion (AM) to shape curved root canals. Thirty mandibular molars with two separate mesial canals 20°–40° curved were collected and scanned using micro-computed tomography (μCT). The canals were then randomly assigned into six groups (n = 10): TRN, VR or TFA instruments activated by CR or AM. TRN groups 17.02, 20.04 and 26.04; VR groups 15.04, 20.05 and 25.06; TFA groups were shaped consecutively using 15K-file, 20.04 and 25.06. After they were shaped, the canals were scanned again. The volume of removed dentin, canal transportation and centring ratio were calculated μCT images. All data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test or one-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05). With both kinematics, the TRN instrument removed the least amount of dentin, the VR-CR and the TFA-AM removed the most (p < 0.05). The transportation and centring ratios among all groups were similar (p > 0.05). The volume of dentin removed, the diameter or design features of the instruments and different kinematics did not affect the centring ratio and the amount of transportation and remained within safe limits. All three instruments activated by either kinematics were found to have similar effectiveness in shaping curved root canals.