Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.018
Jonathan Dartnell, Darlene Cox, Paresh Dawda, Catherine Hill
{"title":"Quality use of medicines: who owns it now?","authors":"Jonathan Dartnell, Darlene Cox, Paresh Dawda, Catherine Hill","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.018","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"72-74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216907/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141500165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.021
Louise M Waite
Established drug therapies for Alzheimer disease (cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) do not modify the disease course and provide only modest clinical benefit. Biomarker measures of amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration have been integral to Alzheimer disease clinical trials for biologic drugs, for patient selection and efficacy monitoring. At the time of writing, two monoclonal antibodies targeting the amyloid-beta protein (aducanumab and lecanemab) have been approved in the USA, and two agents (lecanemab and donanemab) are under evaluation by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia. Clinical trials have demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies are effective at removing amyloid from the brain in people with early Alzheimer disease. Cognitive benefits are statistically significant, but do not achieve the minimal clinically important difference. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities of vasogenic oedema and microhaemorrhages occur more frequently on treatment; although these are usually asymptomatic or transient, in some people they are serious or fatal. Targeting amyloid as a unimodal strategy is unlikely to be sufficient and future therapies may need to be multimodal, targeting multiple pathogenic pathways. The burden of dementia is greatest in the older population where mixed dementia pathology dominates; the relationship between biomarkers, clinical phenotype and pathology attenuates; and frailty and comorbidity impact cognition. This creates challenges in identifying effective therapies for the group where dementia is most prevalent.
{"title":"New and emerging drug therapies for Alzheimer disease.","authors":"Louise M Waite","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.021","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Established drug therapies for Alzheimer disease (cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) do not modify the disease course and provide only modest clinical benefit. Biomarker measures of amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration have been integral to Alzheimer disease clinical trials for biologic drugs, for patient selection and efficacy monitoring. At the time of writing, two monoclonal antibodies targeting the amyloid-beta protein (aducanumab and lecanemab) have been approved in the USA, and two agents (lecanemab and donanemab) are under evaluation by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia. Clinical trials have demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies are effective at removing amyloid from the brain in people with early Alzheimer disease. Cognitive benefits are statistically significant, but do not achieve the minimal clinically important difference. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities of vasogenic oedema and microhaemorrhages occur more frequently on treatment; although these are usually asymptomatic or transient, in some people they are serious or fatal. Targeting amyloid as a unimodal strategy is unlikely to be sufficient and future therapies may need to be multimodal, targeting multiple pathogenic pathways. The burden of dementia is greatest in the older population where mixed dementia pathology dominates; the relationship between biomarkers, clinical phenotype and pathology attenuates; and frailty and comorbidity impact cognition. This creates challenges in identifying effective therapies for the group where dementia is most prevalent.</p>","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"75-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141500163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.024
Emily Tucker, Maeve O'Sullivan, Lisa Waddell
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infectious syndrome in Australia and a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. It drives a significant amount of antimicrobial prescribing in Australia. Accurate assessment and stratification of CAP severity is important. However, adequate evaluation is challenging and controversy remains about the optimal method. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most commonly identified bacterial pathogen causing CAP. As such, oral amoxicillin monotherapy is the mainstay of empirical therapy for low-severity CAP. The need to start empirical therapy for pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella species in low-severity CAP remains controversial; evaluating the causative pathogen on clinical grounds alone is difficult. Oral antibiotics recommended for CAP (e.g. amoxicillin, doxycycline) have excellent bioavailability and may be used instead of intravenous therapy in some hospitalised patients. A duration of 5 days of antibiotic therapy is recommended in clinical practice guidelines for patients with uncomplicated CAP who meet stability criteria at follow-up.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是澳大利亚常见的感染性综合征,也是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。在澳大利亚,抗菌药物的处方量很大。对 CAP 的严重程度进行准确评估和分层非常重要。然而,进行充分的评估具有挑战性,而且对最佳方法仍存在争议。肺炎链球菌是导致 CAP 最常见的细菌病原体。因此,口服阿莫西林单药治疗是低度 CAP 经验性治疗的主要方法。对于低度 CAP 患者是否需要开始对肺炎支原体和军团菌等病原体进行经验性治疗仍存在争议;仅从临床角度评估致病病原体非常困难。建议用于治疗 CAP 的口服抗生素(如阿莫西林、强力霉素)具有极佳的生物利用度,可用于某些住院患者,以取代静脉注射治疗。临床实践指南建议,对无并发症的 CAP 患者进行为期 5 天的抗生素治疗,并在随访时满足病情稳定的标准。
{"title":"Controversies in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.","authors":"Emily Tucker, Maeve O'Sullivan, Lisa Waddell","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.024","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infectious syndrome in Australia and a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. It drives a significant amount of antimicrobial prescribing in Australia. Accurate assessment and stratification of CAP severity is important. However, adequate evaluation is challenging and controversy remains about the optimal method. <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> is the most commonly identified bacterial pathogen causing CAP. As such, oral amoxicillin monotherapy is the mainstay of empirical therapy for low-severity CAP. The need to start empirical therapy for pathogens such as <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> and <i>Legionella</i> species in low-severity CAP remains controversial; evaluating the causative pathogen on clinical grounds alone is difficult. Oral antibiotics recommended for CAP (e.g. amoxicillin, doxycycline) have excellent bioavailability and may be used instead of intravenous therapy in some hospitalised patients. A duration of 5 days of antibiotic therapy is recommended in clinical practice guidelines for patients with uncomplicated CAP who meet stability criteria at follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"80-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216909/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.019
{"title":"Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with a 'normal' LDL-C.","authors":"","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.019","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.027
{"title":"Nirsevimab for prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants.","authors":"","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.027","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"102-103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216910/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141500164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.023
Emily Reeve, Danijela Gnjidic, Aili V Langford, Sarah N Hilmer
Antihypertensive drugs are commonly used by older adults because of the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, and the increased absolute benefit of blood pressure reduction with increasing age. Clinical trials of blood pressure reduction in older adults have generally excluded older adults with multimorbidity, frailty and limited life expectancy. In this population, the benefit-harm ratio of aggressive blood pressure lowering may become unfavourable; a more relaxed blood pressure target may be appropriate; and deprescribing (cessation or dose reduction) of one or more antihypertensive drugs can be considered. Before deprescribing an antihypertensive drug, it is important to consider other indications for which it may have been prescribed (e.g. heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, diabetic nephropathy, atrial fibrillation). Evidence from randomised controlled deprescribing trials indicates that it is possible to deprescribe antihypertensives in frail older people. However, some patients may experience an increase in blood pressure that warrants restarting the drug. There are limited data on long-term outcomes (follow-up in deprescribing trials ranged from 4 to 56 weeks). The risk of adverse outcomes associated with deprescribing, such as withdrawal effects, can be minimised through appropriate planning, patient engagement, dose tapering and monitoring.
{"title":"Deprescribing antihypertensive drugs in frail older adults.","authors":"Emily Reeve, Danijela Gnjidic, Aili V Langford, Sarah N Hilmer","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.023","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antihypertensive drugs are commonly used by older adults because of the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, and the increased absolute benefit of blood pressure reduction with increasing age. Clinical trials of blood pressure reduction in older adults have generally excluded older adults with multimorbidity, frailty and limited life expectancy. In this population, the benefit-harm ratio of aggressive blood pressure lowering may become unfavourable; a more relaxed blood pressure target may be appropriate; and deprescribing (cessation or dose reduction) of one or more antihypertensive drugs can be considered. Before deprescribing an antihypertensive drug, it is important to consider other indications for which it may have been prescribed (e.g. heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, diabetic nephropathy, atrial fibrillation). Evidence from randomised controlled deprescribing trials indicates that it is possible to deprescribe antihypertensives in frail older people. However, some patients may experience an increase in blood pressure that warrants restarting the drug. There are limited data on long-term outcomes (follow-up in deprescribing trials ranged from 4 to 56 weeks). The risk of adverse outcomes associated with deprescribing, such as withdrawal effects, can be minimised through appropriate planning, patient engagement, dose tapering and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216913/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.028
{"title":"Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines for older adults, and pregnant women to prevent disease in their infant.","authors":"","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.028","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"100-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216915/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141500166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.020
Varan Perananthan, Miles P Sparrow, Anna Foley
{"title":"Thiopurines and risk of lymphoproliferative disorders.","authors":"Varan Perananthan, Miles P Sparrow, Anna Foley","doi":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.020","DOIUrl":"10.18773/austprescr.2024.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55588,"journal":{"name":"Australian Prescriber","volume":"47 3","pages":"91-93"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}