Pub Date : 2025-09-13DOI: 10.1007/s10163-025-02381-7
Lei Qian, Qian Liu, Hongling Gong
Waste separation is a fundamental element of environmental governance, yet debates persist over optimal policy strategies. Drawing on the incentive-value-behavior chain, this study explains how and for whom reward-based versus punishment-based interventions sustain waste separation behavior (WSB). Based on field surveys in China, the results indicate that both rewards and punishments directly affect WSB. Internal perceived value plays a mediating role in the process of rewards and punishments in promoting residents’ WSB. External perceived value only plays a mediating role in the process of reward incentives in promoting residents’ WSB. That is, individuals with strong internal perceived value respond to both rewards and punishments, whereas for those with strong external perceived value, reward incentives are more effective. These findings offer valuable insights for governments seeking to select and design their incentive policies for waste separation.
{"title":"Stick or carrot, which works better on residents’ waste separation behavior","authors":"Lei Qian, Qian Liu, Hongling Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02381-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10163-025-02381-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Waste separation is a fundamental element of environmental governance, yet debates persist over optimal policy strategies. Drawing on the incentive-value-behavior chain, this study explains how and for whom reward-based versus punishment-based interventions sustain waste separation behavior (WSB). Based on field surveys in China, the results indicate that both rewards and punishments directly affect WSB. Internal perceived value plays a mediating role in the process of rewards and punishments in promoting residents’ WSB. External perceived value only plays a mediating role in the process of reward incentives in promoting residents’ WSB. That is, individuals with strong internal perceived value respond to both rewards and punishments, whereas for those with strong external perceived value, reward incentives are more effective. These findings offer valuable insights for governments seeking to select and design their incentive policies for waste separation.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 6","pages":"4516 - 4527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145384770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1007/s10163-025-02380-8
Xiaoli Mu, Mingyu Zhang, Xiaojing Chu, Lin Li, Fengfu Yin
Rapid tech advances have boosted smartphone disposal, worsening pollution, and waste. This study employed a questionnaire survey and multiple correspondence analysis to investigate smartphone abandonment and recycling. A total of 1306 valid responses were obtained, revealing differences in abandonment behavior among low-, mid-, and high-priced smartphone users. The impact of consumer behavior, recycling and remanufacturing, and smartphone recycling management on smartphone reuse was discussed. Empirical results indicated that the main reasons for smartphone abandonment were memory issues (47%), functional problems (35%), device malfunctions (32%), and freshness of new models (18%). Low-priced smartphone users were more likely to discard phones due to memory issues and device malfunctions, while high-priced smartphone users tended to discard their phones for functionality upgrades or freshness. Additionally, the proportion of abandonment attributed to relative causes of obsolescence, including functional problems, memory issues, and the freshness of new models, reached 52%, gradually surpassing the 17% attributed to absolute causes of obsolescence, specifically device malfunctions. Therefore, promoting green consumerism, encouraging design upgrades by remanufacturers, and improving e-waste management are essential for better resource utilization and environmental protection.
{"title":"Exploration of driving factors for smartphone abandonment and recycling in China","authors":"Xiaoli Mu, Mingyu Zhang, Xiaojing Chu, Lin Li, Fengfu Yin","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02380-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10163-025-02380-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid tech advances have boosted smartphone disposal, worsening pollution, and waste. This study employed a questionnaire survey and multiple correspondence analysis to investigate smartphone abandonment and recycling. A total of 1306 valid responses were obtained, revealing differences in abandonment behavior among low-, mid-, and high-priced smartphone users. The impact of consumer behavior, recycling and remanufacturing, and smartphone recycling management on smartphone reuse was discussed. Empirical results indicated that the main reasons for smartphone abandonment were memory issues (47%), functional problems (35%), device malfunctions (32%), and freshness of new models (18%). Low-priced smartphone users were more likely to discard phones due to memory issues and device malfunctions, while high-priced smartphone users tended to discard their phones for functionality upgrades or freshness. Additionally, the proportion of abandonment attributed to relative causes of obsolescence, including functional problems, memory issues, and the freshness of new models, reached 52%, gradually surpassing the 17% attributed to absolute causes of obsolescence, specifically device malfunctions. Therefore, promoting green consumerism, encouraging design upgrades by remanufacturers, and improving e-waste management are essential for better resource utilization and environmental protection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 6","pages":"4499 - 4515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145384782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A large part of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is composed of organic substances that can be divided and transformed into valuable resources. Composting has been promoted as an environmentally friendly method to solve waste pollution concerns, mostly at the household level, due to the high percentage of organic waste generated in homes. Composting is the process of converting organic matter into organic fertilizers. To produce compost and higher-quality products more efficiently, a complete understanding of the composting process is necessary, including the process parameters, the mechanisms active in the process, and the parameters that affect compost production. Additionally, the design of the composting bin, such as the shape of the bin, crusher, microorganisms, temperature, moisture, C/N ratio, pH, and aeration, must be taken into account. This review article examines the parameters affecting compost production from the point of view of home compost design, to optimize the parameters of the composting process and the factors affecting the geometry of the home composting machine to make it easier to produce and use the home composting machine to convert organic materials into compost, especially in countries that produce a large amount of organic waste.