Academic Psychiatry最新文献

Objective: The authors examined trends of individual career development awards from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to psychiatry faculty, especially physicians, in comparison to other departments.

Methods: Data were obtained on 33,392 career development awards from 2013 to 2022. We examined the number of awards each year averaged for 46 non-psychiatry departments, and for departments of psychiatry, the number of awards to all faculty, physicians, and physicians without a PhD. Linear regressions determined whether number of career development awards increased with time and if estimated slopes differed between faculty in non-psychiatry departments and other groups.

Results: In departments of psychiatry, 534 faculty received an NIH individual career development award during the 10-year period (534/33,392 or 1.6%), with 118 (22%) to physicians. The number of awards increased significantly over time for other departments and departments of psychiatry (estimated slopes of 3.05 and 2.38, respectively) and did not differ from one another. However, the number of awards to physicians and physicians without a PhD in departments of psychiatry (estimated slopes of 0.51 and - 0.07, respectively) have not increased. This lack of growth in awards for physicians and physicians without a PhD in departments of psychiatry differed significantly in comparison with the increase shown in awards to other departments over time (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The number of NIH career development awards has increased NIH-wide, and for non-physician faculty but not for physicians in departments of psychiatry. These trends raise concerns for the future of psychiatrists in academic research.

Objective: This article details a novel intervention for teaching psychiatric interviewing techniques implemented at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston.

Methods: Forty medical students played the newly developed educational game Psychobabble to enhance their assessment of auditory hallucinations. Pre-session and post-session surveys assessed students' inquiry methods, competence, training relevance, and exercise efficacy. Paired t-tests compared pre-session and post-session data. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes from participant comments.

Results: There was an average increase of 12.11 questions between the estimated number of questions (mean = 9.57; SD = 6.00) and the actual number of questions formulated during the game (mean = 21.68; SD = 5.40; p < 0.01). There was a significant increase from the pre-session (mean = 1.82; SD = 0.97) to the post-session (mean = 3.72; SD = 0.76) self-reported competence levels, which more than doubled on average (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The themes that emerged from the qualitative data demonstrate that Psychobabble encourages creativity, broadens assessment methods, has educational significance for learners, and may ultimately lead to improved patient care by enhancing the understanding and diagnosis of psychiatric symptomatology. Medical schools and residency training programs should consider incorporating educational games such as Psychobabble to enhance the interviewing techniques of trainees and their self-efficacy in these skills.

Objective: Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for patients with suicidality and emotion dysregulation. There is increasing evidence of using DBT in psychiatric inpatient units for youth. On inpatient units, the majority of treatment is provided by psychiatry trainees, often with limited therapy experience. The study's objective was to assess the impact of a 1-h weekly DBT training for a range of medical trainees rotating through a child and adolescent acute inpatient unit.

Methods: Participants were 55 medical students, psychiatry residents, and child and adolescent psychiatry fellows who rotated on an inpatient unit for youth and participated in a 1-h DBT didactic. There was one group who attended less than four sessions and the other attended 5 or more sessions. A pre- and post-method design was used to collect data on participants' confidence, competence, and knowledge of DBT and working with suicidal youth.

Results: Comparing pre- and post-data for all participants, the DBT training was found to lead to significant benefits for trainees' comfort with therapy, prioritizing therapy during inpatient care, knowledge of DBT, comfort with DBT, and confidence in treating children and adolescents with suicidality. There were no significant differences in the type of trainee or dose of training.

Conclusion: This study supports the benefit of a brief DBT didactic to provide training to a wide range of trainees to improve therapeutic care in an inpatient psychiatric unit for youth.