Advances in biological regulation最新文献

Aberrant signaling pathways regulating proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can contribute to disease pathogenesis and neoplastic growth. Phosphoinositides (PIs) are inositol phospholipids that are implicated in the regulation of critical signaling pathways: aberrant regulation of Phospholipase C (PLC) beta1, PLCgamma1 and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway play essential roles in the pathogenesis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

In mammals, phospholipase D (PLD) enzymes involve 6 isoforms, of which only three have established lipase activity to produce the signaling lipid phosphatidic acid (PA). This phospholipase activity has been postulated to contribute to cancer progression for over three decades now, but the exact mechanisms involved have yet to be uncovered. Indeed, using various models, an altered PLD activity has been proposed altogether to increase cell survival rate, promote angiogenesis, boost rapamycin resistance, and favor metastasis. Although for some part, the molecular pathways by which this increase in PA is pro-oncogenic are partially known, the pleiotropic functions of PA make it quite difficult to distinguish which among these simple signaling pathways is responsible for each of these PLD facets. In this review, we will describe an additional potential contribution of PA generated by PLD1 and PLD2 in the biogenesis, secretion, and uptake of exosomes. Those extracellular vesicles are now viewed as membrane vehicles that carry informative molecules able to modify the fate of receiving cells at distance from the original tumor to favor homing of metastasis. The perspectives for a better understanding of these complex role of PLDs will be discussed.

Mutations in the heterotetrametric adaptor protein 4 (AP-4; ε/β4/μ4/σ4 subunits) membrane trafficking coat complex lead to complex neurological disorders characterized by spastic paraplegia, microcephaly, and intellectual disabilities. Understanding molecular mechanisms underlying these disorders continues to emerge with recent identification of an essential autophagy protein, ATG9A, as an AP-4 cargo. Significant progress has been made uncovering AP-4 function in cell culture and patient-derived cell lines, and ATG9A trafficking by AP-4 is considered a potential target for gene therapy approaches. In contrast, understanding how AP-4 trafficking affects development and function at the organismal level has long been hindered by loss of conserved AP-4 genes in key model systems (S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster). However, zebrafish (Danio rerio) have retained AP-4 and can serve as an important model system for studying both the nervous system and overall development. We undertook gene editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-ExoCas9 knockout system to determine how loss of single AP-4, or its accessory protein tepsin, genes affect embryo development 24 h post-fertilization (hpf). Single gene-edited embryos display abnormal head morphology and neural necrosis. We further conducted the first exploration of how AP-4 single gene knockouts in zebrafish embryos affect expression levels and patterns of two autophagy genes, atg9a and map1lc3b. This work suggests zebrafish may be further adapted and developed as a tool to uncover AP-4 function in membrane trafficking and autophagy in the context of a model organism.

Genetic alterations of the PIK3CA gene, encoding the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3Kα enzyme, are found in a broad spectrum of human cancers. Many cancer-associated PIK3CA mutations occur at 3 hotspot locations and are termed canonical mutations. Canonical mutations result in hyperactivation of PI3K and promote oncogenesis via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and PI3K/COX-2/PGE2 signaling pathways. These mutations also may serve as predictive biomarkers of response to PI3K inhibitors, as well as NSAID therapy. A large number of non-canonical PIK3CA mutations have also been identified in human tumors, but their functional properties are poorly understood. Here we review the landscape of PIK3CA mutations in different cancers and efforts underway to define the functional properties of non-canonical PIK3CA mutations. In addition, we summarize what has been learned from clinical trials of PI3K inhibitors as well as current trials incorporating these molecular targeting agents.

Mutated genes of the RAS family encoding small GTP-binding proteins drive numerous cancers, including pancreatic, colon and lung tumors. Besides the numerous effects of mutant RAS gene expression on aberrant proliferation, transformed phenotypes, metabolism, and therapy resistance, the most striking consequences of chronic RAS activation are changes of the genetic program. By performing systematic gene expression studies in cellular models that allow comparisons of pre-neoplastic with RAS-transformed cells, we and others have estimated that 7 percent or more of all transcripts are altered in conjunction with the expression of the oncogene. In this context, the number of up-regulated transcripts approximates that of down-regulated transcripts. While up-regulated transcription factors such as MYC, FOSL1, and HMGA2 have been identified and characterized as RAS-responsive drivers of the altered transcriptome, the suppressed factors have been less well studied as potential regulators of the genetic program and transformed phenotype in the breadth of their occurrence. We therefore have collected information on downregulated RAS-responsive factors and discuss their potential role as tumor suppressors that are likely to antagonize active cancer drivers. To better understand the active mechanisms that entail anti-RAS function and those that lead to loss of tumor suppressor activity, we focus on the tumor suppressor HREV107 (alias PLAAT3 [Phospholipase A and acyltransferase 3], PLA2G16 [Phospholipase A2, group XVI] and HRASLS3 [HRAS-like suppressor 3]). Inactivating HREV107 mutations in tumors are extremely rare, hence epigenetic causes modulated by the RAS pathway are likely to lead to down-regulation and loss of function.

Pancreatic islets are micro-organs composed of a mixture of endocrine and non-endocrine cells, where the former secrete hormones and peptides necessary for metabolic homeostasis. Through vasculature and innervation the cells within the islets are in communication with the rest of the body, while they interact with each other through juxtacrine, paracrine and autocrine signals, resulting in fine-tuned sensing and response to stimuli. In this context, cellular protrusion in islet cells, such as primary cilia and filopodia, have gained attention as potential signaling hubs. During the last decade, several pieces of evidence have shown how the primary cilium is required for islet vascularization, function and homeostasis. These findings have been possible thanks to the development of ciliary/basal body specific knockout models and technological advances in microscopy, which allow longitudinal monitoring of engrafted islets transplanted in the anterior chamber of the eye in living animals. Using this technique in combination with optogenetics, new potential paracrine interactions have been suggested. For example, reshaping and active movement of filopodia-like protrusions of δ-cells were visualized in vivo, suggesting a continuous cell remodeling to increase intercellular contacts. In this review, we discuss these recent discoveries regarding primary cilia and filopodia and their role in islet homeostasis and intercellular islet communication.

During the first year of the pandemic, East Asian countries have reported fewer infections, hospitalizations, and deaths from COVID-19 disease than most countries in Europe and the Americas. Our goal in this paper is to generate and evaluate hypothesis that may explain this striking fact. We consider five possible explanations: (1) population age structure (younger people tend to have less severe COVID-19 disease upon infection than older people); (2) the early adoption of lockdown strategies to control disease spread; (3) genetic differences between East Asian population and European and American populations that confer protection against COVID-19 disease; (4) seasonal and climactic contributors to COVID-19 spread; and (5) immunological differences between East Asian countries and the rest of the world. The evidence suggests that the first four hypotheses are unlikely to be important in explaining East Asian COVID-19 exceptionalism. Lockdowns, in particular, fail as an explanation because East Asian countries experienced similarly good infection outcomes despite vast differences in lockdown policies adopted by different countries to control the COVID-19 epidemic. The evidence to date is consistent with our fifth hypothesis – pre-existing immunity unique to East Asia – but there are still essential parts of this story left for scientists to check.