Pub Date : 2020-02-25eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1728277
Israa Atif Kassem, Ibrahim Elsebai Farrag, Samir Mahmoud Zidan, Jylan Fouad ElGuindy, Reham Said Elbasty
Endocrowns represent a conservative and esthetic restorative alternative to full coverage crowns. They can be constructed using various CAD/CAM materials that can provide a modulus of elasticity similar to that of teeth. The ability to use of such materials in composite blocks that can be easily repaired is also an advantage, provided appropriate bonding performance is ensured. This study, therefore, evaluated the marginal gap and fracture resistance of two CAD/CAM endocrown materials using two bonding protocols. Thirty-two mandibular molars were evaluated in two groups based on the material type: a Cerasmart group (GC America Inc; n = 16) acting as the control and a Ceramill COMP group (Amann Girrbach, Germany; n = 16). These groups were then classified according to the bonding protocol used: a total-etch bonding protocol (n = 8) and a self-etch bonding protocol (n = 8) implemented using RelyX ultimate adhesive resin cement (3M ESPE). The samples were then subjected to aging by simulating a 1-year thermo-mechanical process. The marginal gap results were statistically insignificant across the material and bonding protocol groups before thermo-mechanical aging. Thermo-mechanical aging significantly reduced the marginal gap distance for Ceramill COMP endocrowns cemented using the total-etch protocol (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was recorded for the fracture resistance in either the material or bonding protocol groups (p ≥ 0.05). Both materials and bonding protocols can, therefore, be used in the posterior region providing conservative treatment, adequate marginal gap and fracture resistance.
{"title":"Marginal gap and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM ceramill COMP and cerasmart endocrowns for restoring endodontically treated molars bonded with two adhesive protocols: an <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Israa Atif Kassem, Ibrahim Elsebai Farrag, Samir Mahmoud Zidan, Jylan Fouad ElGuindy, Reham Said Elbasty","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1728277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1728277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endocrowns represent a conservative and esthetic restorative alternative to full coverage crowns. They can be constructed using various CAD/CAM materials that can provide a modulus of elasticity similar to that of teeth. The ability to use of such materials in composite blocks that can be easily repaired is also an advantage, provided appropriate bonding performance is ensured. This study, therefore, evaluated the marginal gap and fracture resistance of two CAD/CAM endocrown materials using two bonding protocols. Thirty-two mandibular molars were evaluated in two groups based on the material type: a Cerasmart group (GC America Inc; <i>n</i> = 16) acting as the control and a Ceramill COMP group (Amann Girrbach, Germany; <i>n</i> = 16). These groups were then classified according to the bonding protocol used: a total-etch bonding protocol (<i>n</i> = 8) and a self-etch bonding protocol (<i>n</i> = 8) implemented using RelyX ultimate adhesive resin cement (3M ESPE). The samples were then subjected to aging by simulating a 1-year thermo-mechanical process. The marginal gap results were statistically insignificant across the material and bonding protocol groups before thermo-mechanical aging. Thermo-mechanical aging significantly reduced the marginal gap distance for Ceramill COMP endocrowns cemented using the total-etch protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was recorded for the fracture resistance in either the material or bonding protocol groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05). Both materials and bonding protocols can, therefore, be used in the posterior region providing conservative treatment, adequate marginal gap and fracture resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1728277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37758240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-11eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1724512
Håvard Jostein Haugen, Brandon Michael Soltvedt, Peter N Nguyen, Hans Jacob Ronold, Gaute Floer Johnsen
Purpose: Even though the use of full ceramic crowns have become a well-established practice in dental clinics compare to the last decade, the use of imported casted porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFMs) crowns is still prevalent. The use of imported PFMs is often economically driven; however, when dentists order PFMs, they do not have capabilities to examine its true alloy content. Therefore, we raise the questions whether cheaper imported PFMs have more discrepancies in alloy content compared to domestically produced PFMs? Materials and Methods: This study included 62 porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: 41 produced in Norway and 21 imported. Their alloy-composition was determined non-destructively by EDX and SEM. Results and Conclusions: Imported PFMs demonstrated larger deviations compared with non-imported PFMs. Significant deviation was found in key metallic elements in the different alloys (W, In, Pd, Ag). The detected deviations in key element such as Wolfram and Indium could influence the PFMs service time. These finding may be of international concern.
{"title":"Discrepancy in alloy composition of imported and non-imported porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns produced by Norwegian dental laboratories.","authors":"Håvard Jostein Haugen, Brandon Michael Soltvedt, Peter N Nguyen, Hans Jacob Ronold, Gaute Floer Johnsen","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1724512","DOIUrl":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1724512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Even though the use of full ceramic crowns have become a well-established practice in dental clinics compare to the last decade, the use of imported casted porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFMs) crowns is still prevalent. The use of imported PFMs is often economically driven; however, when dentists order PFMs, they do not have capabilities to examine its true alloy content. Therefore, we raise the questions whether cheaper imported PFMs have more discrepancies in alloy content compared to domestically produced PFMs? <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study included 62 porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: 41 produced in Norway and 21 imported. Their alloy-composition was determined non-destructively by EDX and SEM. <b>Results and Conclusions:</b> Imported PFMs demonstrated larger deviations compared with non-imported PFMs. Significant deviation was found in key metallic elements in the different alloys (W, In, Pd, Ag). The detected deviations in key element such as Wolfram and Indium could influence the PFMs service time. These finding may be of international concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033715/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37702973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-29eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470
Sigfus Thor Eliasson, Jon Einar Dahl
Objectives: To investigate temperature changes in various test specimens during thermal cycling and to evaluate difference in micro-tensile repair bond strength in specimens cut from the inner or the outer area of composite blocks after thermal cycling. Materials and methods: Four rectangular composite blocks of various sizes were fabricated, and thermocouples placed in the centre of the specimens or halfway from the surface to the centre. Composite cylinders were made on ground flat extracted molars, as intended for micro-tensile and shear bond testing, with a thermocouple placed at the centre of the cylinder radius between composite and dentin. The specimens were thermal cycled between 5 °C and 55 °C with 20-60 s dwell times. The highest and lowest temperatures in the test specimens were recorded. Composite blocks were fabricated and stored in water for a week and then repaired with the same composite. After thermal cycling (5000×, 5 °C and 55 °C with a 20 s dwell time), test specimens were cut for micro-tensile testing. Results: None of the specimens tested reached the cold and warm water bath temperatures after a 20 s dwell time. In the smallest composite block, the centre core temperature reached 5 °C and 55 °C after 40 s dwell time, but lacked 1 °C after 60 s in the largest block. None of the specimens involving teeth reached water temperatures. The micro-tensile repair strength was significantly different between the outer and the central cut rods (p < .05). Conclusions: The most commonly used dwell times for thermal cycling are insufficient to create a homogeneous temperature change.
{"title":"Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens.","authors":"Sigfus Thor Eliasson, Jon Einar Dahl","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To investigate temperature changes in various test specimens during thermal cycling and to evaluate difference in micro-tensile repair bond strength in specimens cut from the inner or the outer area of composite blocks after thermal cycling. <b>Materials and methods:</b> Four rectangular composite blocks of various sizes were fabricated, and thermocouples placed in the centre of the specimens or halfway from the surface to the centre. Composite cylinders were made on ground flat extracted molars, as intended for micro-tensile and shear bond testing, with a thermocouple placed at the centre of the cylinder radius between composite and dentin. The specimens were thermal cycled between 5 °C and 55 °C with 20-60 s dwell times. The highest and lowest temperatures in the test specimens were recorded. Composite blocks were fabricated and stored in water for a week and then repaired with the same composite. After thermal cycling (5000×, 5 °C and 55 °C with a 20 s dwell time), test specimens were cut for micro-tensile testing. <b>Results:</b> None of the specimens tested reached the cold and warm water bath temperatures after a 20 s dwell time. In the smallest composite block, the centre core temperature reached 5 °C and 55 °C after 40 s dwell time, but lacked 1 °C after 60 s in the largest block. None of the specimens involving teeth reached water temperatures. The micro-tensile repair strength was significantly different between the outer and the central cut rods (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The most commonly used dwell times for thermal cycling are insufficient to create a homogeneous temperature change.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37702972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-20eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445
Per Svanborg, Lars Hjalmarsson
Purpose: To compare the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit FDPs in cobalt chromium fabricated using different manufacturing techniques. Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using clearly specified search terms and inclusion criteria. The search yielded 1071 articles and included 18 articles in the analysis. Data regarding the fit analyses and the methods of manufacturing were extracted and the accuracy was defined as the fit result minus the pre-set cement spacer. Internal gap (IntG) was the mean of all the internal measuring points and total gap (TotG) was the mean of all measuring points (marginal, cervical, chamfer, axial, occlusal). Results: The total gap results for fit and accuracy irrespective of manufacturing technique were 96 μm and 54 μm for single crowns, 107 μm and 54 μm for multi-unit FDPs, and 98 μm and 54 μm for both single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined. For total gap of single crowns soft milling had the highest accuracy, for multi-unit FDPs additive manufactured restorations had the highest accuracy. With the results grouped by impression technique, the accuracy for total gap was highest for digital impressions and lower for conventional impressions. Conclusions: Due to the inherent limitations of this systematic review, it still remains unclear what effect the manufacturing technique has on the fit of FDPs. However, the descriptive results suggest that the marginal fit of cobalt chromium FDPs is not negatively affected by the manufacturing technique.
目的:比较不同制造工艺制备的单、多单元钴铬牙支撑fdp的配合度并评估其精度。材料和方法:在三个数据库中进行系统检索;PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science,使用明确指定的搜索词和包含标准。搜索产生了1071篇文章,其中18篇文章被纳入了分析。提取有关拟合分析和制造方法的数据,并将精度定义为拟合结果减去预先设置的水泥隔离剂。内间隙(IntG)为所有内测点的平均值,总间隙(TotG)为所有测点(边缘、颈、倒角、轴向、咬合)的平均值。结果:单冠和多单元fdp的配合度和精度的总间隙分别为96 μm和54 μm,多单元fdp的配合度和精度的总间隙分别为107 μm和54 μm,单冠和多单元fdp的配合度和精度的总间隙分别为98 μm和54 μm。对于单冠总间隙,软铣削具有最高的精度,对于多单元fdp,添加剂制造的修复具有最高的精度。与结果分组的印象技术,总差距的准确性是最高的数字印象和较低的传统印象。结论:由于本系统综述的固有局限性,目前尚不清楚制造技术对fdp配合度的影响。然而,描述性结果表明,钴铬fdp的边际拟合不受制造技术的负面影响。
{"title":"A systematic review on the accuracy of manufacturing techniques for cobalt chromium fixed dental prostheses.","authors":"Per Svanborg, Lars Hjalmarsson","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit FDPs in cobalt chromium fabricated using different manufacturing techniques. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A systematic search was performed in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using clearly specified search terms and inclusion criteria. The search yielded 1071 articles and included 18 articles in the analysis. Data regarding the fit analyses and the methods of manufacturing were extracted and the accuracy was defined as the fit result minus the pre-set cement spacer. Internal gap (IntG) was the mean of all the internal measuring points and total gap (TotG) was the mean of all measuring points (marginal, cervical, chamfer, axial, occlusal). <b>Results:</b> The total gap results for fit and accuracy irrespective of manufacturing technique were 96 μm and 54 μm for single crowns, 107 μm and 54 μm for multi-unit FDPs, and 98 μm and 54 μm for both single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined. For total gap of single crowns soft milling had the highest accuracy, for multi-unit FDPs additive manufactured restorations had the highest accuracy. With the results grouped by impression technique, the accuracy for total gap was highest for digital impressions and lower for conventional impressions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Due to the inherent limitations of this systematic review, it still remains unclear what effect the manufacturing technique has on the fit of FDPs. However, the descriptive results suggest that the marginal fit of cobalt chromium FDPs is not negatively affected by the manufacturing technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"31-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1714445","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37665726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-11eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760
Shreya Tyagi, Abi M Thomas, Neeta Devi Sinnappah-Kang
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline®, GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA® Coat (resin). Method: Thirty-six identical specimens of GIC were made. Six specimens were used in preparation of standard solution and remaining thirty were divided into five groups with six specimens in each group. Each test specimen was coated with one of the surface protecting agent except for the control group. The specimens were immersed separately into 1 ml of 0.05% methylene blue solution for 24 h and then rinsed with deionised water and further immersed into tubes containing 1 ml of 65% nitric acid. Specimens, once completely dissolved in nitric acid solution, were filtered and centrifuged. The supernatant was used to determine the absorbance using a spectrophotometer. The effectiveness of the surface protecting agents for the GIC was recorded in micrograms of dye per specimen, where low values indicate good protection. Result: Tukey HSD test revealed that GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish; mean = 21.25 µg/ml), G-Coat Plus™ (resin; mean = 30.39 µg/ml) and EQUIA® Coat (resin; mean = 9.32 µg/ml) were statistically not significantly different to each other and were effective in protecting the surface of GIC. Significance: The study found that there was a statistically significant difference between control and GC Fuji VARNISH™, G-Coat Plus™ and EQUIA® Coat. The three agents were found to be equally effective in protecting the surface of GIC.
目的:评价和比较树脂基和清漆基表面保护剂对玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)的防护效果。使用的不同表面保护剂有:凡士林®、GC富士清漆™(清漆)、G-Coat Plus™(树脂)和EQUIA®Coat(树脂)。方法:制作36例相同的GIC标本。取6个标本制备标准溶液,其余30个标本分为5组,每组6个标本。除对照组外,每个试样都涂上一种表面保护剂。将标本分别浸入1 ml 0.05%亚甲基蓝溶液中24 h,然后用去离子水冲洗,再浸入含有1 ml 65%硝酸的管中。标本在硝酸溶液中完全溶解后,过滤并离心。上清液用分光光度计测定吸光度。GIC表面保护剂的有效性以每个样品的染料微克为单位记录,其中低值表明保护良好。结果:Tukey HSD测试显示GC富士清漆™(清漆;平均值= 21.25µg/ml), g - coat Plus™(树脂;平均值= 30.39µg/ml)和EQUIA®Coat(树脂;平均值= 9.32µg/ml),差异无统计学意义,均能有效保护GIC表面。意义:研究发现对照组与GC Fuji VARNISH™、G-Coat Plus™和EQUIA®Coat之间存在统计学差异。发现这三种药物对GIC表面的保护同样有效。
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement - a spectrophotometric analysis.","authors":"Shreya Tyagi, Abi M Thomas, Neeta Devi Sinnappah-Kang","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The different surface protective agents used were: Vaseline<sup>®</sup>, GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish), G-Coat Plus™ (resin) and EQUIA<sup>®</sup> Coat (resin). <b>Method:</b> Thirty-six identical specimens of GIC were made. Six specimens were used in preparation of standard solution and remaining thirty were divided into five groups with six specimens in each group. Each test specimen was coated with one of the surface protecting agent except for the control group. The specimens were immersed separately into 1 ml of 0.05% methylene blue solution for 24 h and then rinsed with deionised water and further immersed into tubes containing 1 ml of 65% nitric acid. Specimens, once completely dissolved in nitric acid solution, were filtered and centrifuged. The supernatant was used to determine the absorbance using a spectrophotometer. The effectiveness of the surface protecting agents for the GIC was recorded in micrograms of dye per specimen, where low values indicate good protection. <b>Result:</b> Tukey HSD test revealed that GC Fuji VARNISH™ (varnish; mean = 21.25 µg/ml), G-Coat Plus™ (resin; mean = 30.39 µg/ml) and EQUIA<sup>®</sup> Coat (resin; mean = 9.32 µg/ml) were statistically not significantly different to each other and were effective in protecting the surface of GIC. <b>Significance:</b> The study found that there was a statistically significant difference between control and GC Fuji VARNISH™, G-Coat Plus™ and EQUIA<sup>®</sup> Coat. The three agents were found to be equally effective in protecting the surface of GIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1711760","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37665725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-07eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1708202
Per Svanborg
Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses. Background: The fit of zirconia restorations has been reported in several studies, but the accuracy of the manufacturing process is seldom discussed or used when drawing conclusions on the fit. Materials and methods: A literature search of articles published in PubMed between 2 March 2013 and 1 February 2018 was performed using clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 841 articles were found and 767 were excluded after screening the title and abstract. After full-text analysis another 60 articles were excluded which left 14 articles to be included for data extraction. Fit was the mean of distances reported in the studies and accuracy was the fit minus the pre-set spacer Results: For marginal gap of single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined, the fit was 83 μm and the accuracy was 59 μm. The internal gap fit was 111 μm and the accuracy 61 μm. For the total gap, the fit was 101 μm, and the accuracy of the zirconia restorations was 53 μm. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present systematic review the fit of zirconia single crowns and multi-unit FDPs may be regarded as clinically acceptable, and the accuracy of the manufacturing of zirconia is ∼60 μm for marginal, internal, and total gap. Also, digital impressions seem to be associated with a smaller gap value.
{"title":"A systematic review on the accuracy of zirconia crowns and fixed dental prostheses.","authors":"Per Svanborg","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1708202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to review the fit and assess the accuracy of tooth-supported single and multi-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses. <b>Background:</b> The fit of zirconia restorations has been reported in several studies, but the accuracy of the manufacturing process is seldom discussed or used when drawing conclusions on the fit. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A literature search of articles published in PubMed between 2 March 2013 and 1 February 2018 was performed using clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 841 articles were found and 767 were excluded after screening the title and abstract. After full-text analysis another 60 articles were excluded which left 14 articles to be included for data extraction. Fit was the mean of distances reported in the studies and accuracy was the fit minus the pre-set spacer <b>Results:</b> For marginal gap of single crowns and multi-unit FDPs combined, the fit was 83 μm and the accuracy was 59 μm. The internal gap fit was 111 μm and the accuracy 61 μm. For the total gap, the fit was 101 μm, and the accuracy of the zirconia restorations was 53 μm. <b>Conclusions:</b> Within the limitations of the present systematic review the fit of zirconia single crowns and multi-unit FDPs may be regarded as clinically acceptable, and the accuracy of the manufacturing of zirconia is ∼60 μm for marginal, internal, and total gap. Also, digital impressions seem to be associated with a smaller gap value.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708202","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37602203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-03eCollection Date: 2020-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201
Lippo Lassila, Eija Säilynoja, Roosa Prinssi, Pekka K Vallittu, Sufyan Garoushi
Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). Material and methods: A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (n = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p = .05). Results: Significant differences in SG (ranged 3-93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (p < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. Conclusions: The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces.
目的:研究不同抛光工艺对不同牙科树脂复合材料表面光泽度的影响。材料与方法:采用常规RCs (G-aenial Ant)制作长40 mm ×宽10 mm ×厚2 mm的块状标本147个。和Flo X),散装填充RC (Filtek散装填充),氟化物释放RC (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative)和不连续微纤维增强RC (Alert和everX Flow)。每组又分为7个亚组(n = 3),按照抛光方案:不同碳化硅纸磨粒的实验室机抛光(G1: 320)→(G2: 800)→(G3: 1200)→(G4: 2000)→(G5: 4000)。采用一系列soflex螺旋(G6)和磨料抛光点(G7)进行椅边手工抛光。用光泽度计测定60°入射角下的光泽度。在抛光前后测量SG。三维(3d)非接触式光学轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。数据分析采用方差分析(p = 0.05)。结果:根据抛光方案的类型和RC, SG值(范围为3-93 GU)存在显著差异(p)。结论:测试的椅边-手抛光方案的SG值低于实验室机器抛光(4000硅纸砂砾)和未抛光表面。
{"title":"The effect of polishing protocol on surface gloss of different restorative resin composites.","authors":"Lippo Lassila, Eija Säilynoja, Roosa Prinssi, Pekka K Vallittu, Sufyan Garoushi","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The purpose of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to determine the effects of different polishing protocols on the surface gloss (SG) of different commercial dental resin composites (RCs). <b>Material and methods:</b> A total of 147 block-shaped specimens (40 mm length × 10 mm width × 2 mm thick) were made from conventional RCs (G-aenial Ant. and Flo X), bulk-fill RC (Filtek Bulk Fill), fluoride-releasing RCs (BEAUTIFIL II, ACTIVA-Restorative) and discontinuous microfiber-reinforced RCs (Alert and everX Flow). Each group was subdivided into seven subgroups (<i>n</i> = 3), according to polishing protocol: Laboratory-machine polishing with different siliconcarbide paper grits (G1: 320) → (G2: 800) → (G3: 1200) → (G4: 2000) → (G5: 4000). Chairside-hand polishing using a series of Sof-Lex spiral (G6) and abrasive polishing points (G7). Glossmeter was used to determine the SG at 60° incidence angle. SG was measured before and after polishing. Three-dimensional (3 D) noncontact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (<i>p</i> = .05). <b>Results:</b> Significant differences in SG (ranged 3-93 GU) were found according to the type of polishing protocol and RC (<i>p</i> < .05). Specimens polished with 4000 grit paper showed the highest SG (93 GU) values among all the groups tested. <b>Conclusions:</b> The tested chairside-hand polishing protocols presented lower SG values than laboratory-machine polishing (4000 silicon paper grit) and unpolished surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37602202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Coronal leakage and reinfection after root canal therapy is an important reason for endodontic failure. Zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) -based materials are often used as a coronal seal to prevent secondary infection. The antibacterial effect of ZOE cement is mainly due to leaching of eugenol from the material, but the effect is reported to decrease over time. Chitosan (CH) is a natural polymer with antibacterial properties. The aim of the study was to investigate if incorporation of (CH) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) in a ZOE-based material improved both the immediate and sustained antibacterial properties of the material. Methods:Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus epidermidis was used to investigate the antibacterial effect of the materials in a modified direct contact test (MDCT) immediately after setting and after storage for 18 weeks in water. Leaching per week of eugenol from the materials was quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The effect of eugenol on growth of bacteria was measured by reading of optical density at 600 nm after 18 h growth. Mechanical properties were investigated in a compressive strength test according to ISO 3107. Results: The present study showed that a ZOE-based material has antibacterial activity both as freshly prepared and after immersion in water for 18 weeks. Incorporating CH or COS may increase the antibacterial effect depending on the bacterial species investigated. The amount of leached eugenol did not differ between materials or during or after storage. S. mutans showed the highest susceptibility to eugenol of the three species investigated. Modification of the materials with CH or COS reduced the compressive strength, but the requirements in ISO 3017 were still met.
{"title":"Investigation on the antimicrobial activity of chitosan-modified zinc oxide-eugenol cement.","authors":"Inger Sofie Dragland, Hanne Wellendorf, Hilde Kopperud, Ida Stenhagen, Håkon Valen","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1697621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1697621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Coronal leakage and reinfection after root canal therapy is an important reason for endodontic failure. Zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) -based materials are often used as a coronal seal to prevent secondary infection. The antibacterial effect of ZOE cement is mainly due to leaching of eugenol from the material, but the effect is reported to decrease over time. Chitosan (CH) is a natural polymer with antibacterial properties. The aim of the study was to investigate if incorporation of (CH) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) in a ZOE-based material improved both the immediate and sustained antibacterial properties of the material. <b>Methods:</b> <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> was used to investigate the antibacterial effect of the materials in a modified direct contact test (MDCT) immediately after setting and after storage for 18 weeks in water. Leaching per week of eugenol from the materials was quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The effect of eugenol on growth of bacteria was measured by reading of optical density at 600 nm after 18 h growth. Mechanical properties were investigated in a compressive strength test according to ISO 3107. <b>Results:</b> The present study showed that a ZOE-based material has antibacterial activity both as freshly prepared and after immersion in water for 18 weeks. Incorporating CH or COS may increase the antibacterial effect depending on the bacterial species investigated. The amount of leached eugenol did not differ between materials or during or after storage. <i>S. mutans</i> showed the highest susceptibility to eugenol of the three species investigated. Modification of the materials with CH or COS reduced the compressive strength, but the requirements in ISO 3017 were still met.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1697621","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37593396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-12eCollection Date: 2019-01-01DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202
Ana Raquel Benetti, Stavroula Michou, Liselotte Larsen, Anne Peutzfeldt, Ulla Pallesen, Jan Willem Viator van Dijken
Objectives: Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative) to human teeth were compared with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and a control resin composite (Ceram X Mono). Material and Methods: Shear bond strength and marginal adaptation to enamel and dentine were assessed after no pretreatment of the hard tissues or after etching with phosphoric acid (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative and Ceram X Mono) or polyacrylic acid (Fuji II LC). For ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, the effect of applying a self-etch adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona) was also investigated. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bond strength and marginal adaptation in enamel and dentine were significantly different among the investigated materials (p<.05). Due to loss of restorations, it was not possible to measure bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative if no pretreatment was performed or if dentine was etched; however, use of the self-etch adhesive resulted in similar bond strength as Ceram X Mono. Etching improved adhesion of Fuji II LC to enamel and dentine. Regarding marginal adaptation, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the highest wall-to-wall contraction to enamel in all pretreatment groups and the overall highest wall-to-wall contraction to dentine after etching. Due to loss of restorations, no marginal assessment was possible on cavities with margins in dentine when no pretreatment was used. The use of a self-etch adhesive with ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative resulted in similar adaptation to dentine compared to the other materials. Conclusion: The self-adhesive property of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is nonexistent.
目的:将一种生物活性修复材料(ACTIVA bioactive restorative)与树脂改性玻璃离子水门合剂(Fuji II LC)和对照树脂复合材料(Ceram X Mono)在人类牙齿上的粘附性和边缘适应性进行比较。材料和方法:在硬组织未进行预处理或用磷酸(ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative和Ceram X Mono)或聚丙烯酸(Fuji II LC)蚀刻后,评估剪切结合强度和对牙釉质和牙本质的边缘适应性。对于ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative,应用自蚀刻粘合剂(Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona)的效果也进行了研究。数据分析采用非参数检验(α = 0.05)。结果:不同材料在牙釉质和牙本质上的结合强度和边缘适应性有显著差异(结论:ACTIVA BioACTIVE修复体不存在自粘特性。
{"title":"Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material.","authors":"Ana Raquel Benetti, Stavroula Michou, Liselotte Larsen, Anne Peutzfeldt, Ulla Pallesen, Jan Willem Viator van Dijken","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative) to human teeth were compared with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and a control resin composite (Ceram X Mono). <b>Material and Methods:</b> Shear bond strength and marginal adaptation to enamel and dentine were assessed after no pretreatment of the hard tissues or after etching with phosphoric acid (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative and Ceram X Mono) or polyacrylic acid (Fuji II LC). For ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, the effect of applying a self-etch adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply Sirona) was also investigated. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (<i>α</i> = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Bond strength and marginal adaptation in enamel and dentine were significantly different among the investigated materials (<i>p</i><.05). Due to loss of restorations, it was not possible to measure bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative if no pretreatment was performed or if dentine was etched; however, use of the self-etch adhesive resulted in similar bond strength as Ceram X Mono. Etching improved adhesion of Fuji II LC to enamel and dentine. Regarding marginal adaptation, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the highest wall-to-wall contraction to enamel in all pretreatment groups and the overall highest wall-to-wall contraction to dentine after etching. Due to loss of restorations, no marginal assessment was possible on cavities with margins in dentine when no pretreatment was used. The use of a self-etch adhesive with ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative resulted in similar adaptation to dentine compared to the other materials. <b>Conclusion:</b> The self-adhesive property of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is nonexistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"90-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37593395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-06DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1691842
{"title":"Abstracts from the 25th European Dental Materials Conference, EDMC 2019, August 28–30, 2019, Brussels, Belgium","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2019.1691842","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1691842","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2019.1691842","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46943837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}