首页 > 最新文献

Drug and alcohol dependence reports最新文献

英文 中文
Changes in patterns of use and perceptions of cannabis among students in Canada: A decade of data from the Canadian Student Alcohol and Drugs Survey 加拿大学生大麻使用模式的变化和对大麻的看法:加拿大学生酒精和毒品调查的十年数据
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100399
Samantha Goodman , Sebastian A. Srugo , Emilia Krzeminska , Hanan Abramovici

Introduction

The Canadian Student Alcohol and Drugs Survey is a biennial, repeat cross-sectional survey of grade 7–12 students in the Canadian provinces. This study examined cannabis-related behaviours at five timepoints before and after legalization of cannabis for non-medical purposes.

Methods

Trends over time were examined using data from 2014–15 to 2023–24 (n = 264,558). Binary logistic regression examined changes in cannabis use and related behaviours, including frequency; usual method of use; perceived risk and access; usual source; and motor vehicle behaviours. Data were stratified by sex and grade group (grade 7–9 vs. 10–12).

Results

Overall, there was no change in prevalence of past 12-month, past 30-day, or frequent cannabis use (p > 0.05 for all); however, modest increases were observed among females and grade 7–9 students (p < 0.05 for both). Vaping surpassed smoking as the most common method of consumption in 2023–24. Smoking and dabbing cannabis decreased over time, whereas vaping and eating cannabis increased (p < 0.001 for all). Perceived risk of regularly smoking cannabis decreased (p < 0.001), and perceived ease of cannabis access increased (p < 0.001). The most common cannabis sources were social sources. There was no change in driving after using cannabis (p > 0.05), whereas there was a recent increase in riding with a driver who had used cannabis (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While legalization and regulation of cannabis for non-medical purposes was not associated with increases in overall cannabis use among students in Canada, increasing rates of use in females and younger students, and changes in perceptions of risk and accessibility require continued monitoring.
加拿大学生酒精和药物调查是对加拿大各省7-12年级学生进行的两年一次的重复横断面调查。本研究在非医疗目的大麻合法化前后的五个时间点检查了大麻相关行为。方法使用2014-15年至2023-24年的数据(n = 264,558)检查随时间的趋势。二元逻辑回归检查了大麻使用和相关行为的变化,包括频率;常用的使用方法;感知风险和获取;通常的来源;以及机动车行为。数据按性别和年级分组分层(7-9年级vs. 10-12年级)。结果总体而言,过去12个月、过去30天或频繁使用大麻的患病率没有变化(p > 0.05);然而,在女生和7-9年级学生中观察到适度的增加(p < 0.05)。在2023 - 2024年,电子烟超过吸烟成为最常见的消费方式。吸烟和吸食大麻随着时间的推移而减少,而吸食和食用大麻则增加(p < 0.001)。经常吸食大麻的感知风险降低(p < 0.001),获得大麻的感知容易程度增加(p < 0.001)。最常见的大麻来源是社会来源。使用大麻后开车的情况没有变化(p > 0.05),而最近与使用大麻的司机一起乘车的情况有所增加(p < 0.001)。结论:虽然非医疗目的大麻的合法化和管制与加拿大学生总体大麻使用率的增加无关,但女性和年轻学生大麻使用率的增加以及对风险和可及性的看法的变化需要继续监测。
{"title":"Changes in patterns of use and perceptions of cannabis among students in Canada: A decade of data from the Canadian Student Alcohol and Drugs Survey","authors":"Samantha Goodman ,&nbsp;Sebastian A. Srugo ,&nbsp;Emilia Krzeminska ,&nbsp;Hanan Abramovici","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100399","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100399","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Canadian Student Alcohol and Drugs Survey is a biennial, repeat cross-sectional survey of grade 7–12 students in the Canadian provinces. This study examined cannabis-related behaviours at five timepoints before and after legalization of cannabis for non-medical purposes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Trends over time were examined using data from 2014–15 to 2023–24 (n = 264,558). Binary logistic regression examined changes in cannabis use and related behaviours, including frequency; usual method of use; perceived risk and access; usual source; and motor vehicle behaviours. Data were stratified by sex and grade group (grade 7–9 vs. 10–12).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, there was no change in prevalence of past 12-month, past 30-day, or frequent cannabis use (p &gt; 0.05 for all); however, modest increases were observed among females and grade 7–9 students (p &lt; 0.05 for both). Vaping surpassed smoking as the most common method of consumption in 2023–24. Smoking and dabbing cannabis decreased over time, whereas vaping and eating cannabis increased (p &lt; 0.001 for all). Perceived risk of regularly smoking cannabis decreased (p &lt; 0.001), and perceived ease of cannabis access increased (p &lt; 0.001). The most common cannabis sources were social sources. There was no change in driving after using cannabis (p &gt; 0.05), whereas there was a recent increase in riding with a driver who had used cannabis (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While legalization and regulation of cannabis for non-medical purposes was not associated with increases in overall cannabis use among students in Canada, increasing rates of use in females and younger students, and changes in perceptions of risk and accessibility require continued monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145684577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographic differences in buprenorphine and methadone prescribing for surgical patients with opioid use disorder 阿片类药物使用障碍手术患者丁丙诺啡和美沙酮处方的地理差异
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100397
Caitlin P. Coates , Margaret McGlothlin Carroll , Janelle M. Richard , Wendy Y. Craig , Aurora N. Quaye

Background

Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present for surgery while receiving medications for OUD (MOUD), typically buprenorphine or methadone. This study evaluated MOUD use among surgical patients with OUD in a health-system spanning both urban and rural areas in Maine; a predominantly rural state with a significant opioid crisis.

Methods

We retrospectively identified adult surgical patients with OUD admitted to MaineHealth hospitals from 2014 to 2023 who were receiving MOUD prior to the day of surgery. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected; rural designation was determined using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. The primary outcome was the temporal trend in proportion of surgical patients with OUD receiving methadone versus buprenorphine prior to admission. Temporal trends and geographic differences were compared using chi-square tests (p < 0.05).

Results

Of 2099 surgical patients on MOUD, 71.4 % received buprenorphine and 28.6 % methadone. Overall, rural patients were more likely to receive buprenorphine than urban patients (75.1 % vs. 68.5 %) (p < 0.001). Buprenorphine prescribing increased from 52.0 % to 84.2 % in rural areas and from 59.3 % to 72.9 % in urban areas, with corresponding declines in methadone use (both p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Temporal trends showed a significant shift in MOUD prescribing over the study period, with buprenorphine use increasing and methadone use declining in rural and urban populations. Although both medications are considered safe in hospitalized and surgical patients, perioperative management remains inconsistent. Further work is needed to evaluate how these prescribing trends influence clinical outcomes and ensure perioperative protocols support continuity of care for patients with OUD.
背景阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者在接受OUD (mod)药物治疗时经常出现手术,通常是丁丙诺啡或美沙酮。本研究评估了缅因州城市和农村地区的医疗系统中手术OUD患者的使用情况;一个以农村为主的州,存在严重的阿片类药物危机。方法回顾性分析2014年至2023年在缅因州卫生医院接受手术治疗的成年OUD手术患者,这些患者在手术当日接受了mod。收集人口统计学和临床特征;使用城乡通勤区域代码确定农村名称。主要结局是入院前接受美沙酮和丁丙诺啡治疗的OUD手术患者比例的时间趋势。采用卡方检验比较时间趋势和地理差异(p < 0.05)。结果2099例mod手术患者中,71.4%接受丁丙诺啡治疗,28.6%接受美沙酮治疗。总体而言,农村患者比城市患者更有可能接受丁丙诺啡(75.1%比68.5%)(p < 0.001)。丁丙诺啡的处方在农村地区从52.0%增加到84.2%,在城市地区从59.3%增加到72.9%,美沙酮的使用也相应下降(p < 0.05)。结论在研究期间,农村和城市人群中丁丙诺啡的使用增加,美沙酮的使用减少,这一趋势在全国范围内发生了显著变化。尽管这两种药物在住院和手术患者中被认为是安全的,但围手术期的管理仍然不一致。需要进一步的工作来评估这些处方趋势如何影响临床结果,并确保围手术期方案支持OUD患者护理的连续性。
{"title":"Geographic differences in buprenorphine and methadone prescribing for surgical patients with opioid use disorder","authors":"Caitlin P. Coates ,&nbsp;Margaret McGlothlin Carroll ,&nbsp;Janelle M. Richard ,&nbsp;Wendy Y. Craig ,&nbsp;Aurora N. Quaye","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100397","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100397","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present for surgery while receiving medications for OUD (MOUD), typically buprenorphine or methadone. This study evaluated MOUD use among surgical patients with OUD in a health-system spanning both urban and rural areas in Maine; a predominantly rural state with a significant opioid crisis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively identified adult surgical patients with OUD admitted to MaineHealth hospitals from 2014 to 2023 who were receiving MOUD prior to the day of surgery. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected; rural designation was determined using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. The primary outcome was the temporal trend in proportion of surgical patients with OUD receiving methadone versus buprenorphine prior to admission. Temporal trends and geographic differences were compared using chi-square tests (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2099 surgical patients on MOUD, 71.4 % received buprenorphine and 28.6 % methadone. Overall, rural patients were more likely to receive buprenorphine than urban patients (75.1 % vs. 68.5 %) (p &lt; 0.001). Buprenorphine prescribing increased from 52.0 % to 84.2 % in rural areas and from 59.3 % to 72.9 % in urban areas, with corresponding declines in methadone use (both p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Temporal trends showed a significant shift in MOUD prescribing over the study period, with buprenorphine use increasing and methadone use declining in rural and urban populations. Although both medications are considered safe in hospitalized and surgical patients, perioperative management remains inconsistent. Further work is needed to evaluate how these prescribing trends influence clinical outcomes and ensure perioperative protocols support continuity of care for patients with OUD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship between injection status, cocaine use, overdose, and drug-related behaviors among people who use opioids 阿片类药物使用者注射状态、可卡因使用、过量和药物相关行为之间的关系
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100398
Carl A. Latkin , Lauren Dayton , Haley Bonneau , Melissa A. Davey-Rothwell , Grace Tian Yi , Kaori Suga , Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia

Background

The co-use of opioids and stimulants is associated with elevated health risks. This study examined patterns of injection drug use and cocaine use frequency among people who use opioids.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were collected from community-recruited adults who use opioids in Baltimore, Maryland, between December 7, 2022 and January 26, 2025. Participants were categorized into four groups based on injection status and cocaine use frequency. Multinomial logistic regression examined factors associated with group membership, calculating relative risk ratios (RRR) and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

Of 777 participants (60.7 % male, 71.6 % Black, median age 52), 29.2 % reported past-month injection drug use. Daily/almost daily use was reported for heroin/fentanyl (79.5 %), crack cocaine (43.2 %), and powder cocaine (9.3 %). Four distinct drug use patterns emerged: not inject/lower frequency cocaine use (42.0 %), inject/lower frequency cocaine use (9.3 %), not inject/higher frequency cocaine use (28.8 %), and inject/higher frequency cocaine use (19.9 %). Factors significantly associated with injecting and higher frequency cocaine use group membership included: overdose history (aRRR=2.58, 95 % CI=1.52–4.38), withdrawal behavior with high overdose risk (aRRR=1.29, 95 % CI=1.14–1.46), and using in multiple locations (aRRR=1.09, 95 % CI=1.02–1.18).

Conclusions

Nearly one-fifth of people who use opioids reported both injection drug use and high-frequency cocaine use, and greater frequency of cocaine use was associated with higher overdose risk. Targeted interventions addressing polysubstance use patterns, social networks, and environmental factors are urgently needed to reduce harm among this high-risk population.
阿片类药物和兴奋剂的共同使用与健康风险升高有关。这项研究调查了阿片类药物使用者的注射毒品使用模式和可卡因使用频率。方法收集2022年12月7日至2025年1月26日期间在马里兰州巴尔的摩社区招募的使用阿片类药物的成年人的横断面数据。参与者根据注射状态和可卡因使用频率分为四组。多项逻辑回归检查与群体成员相关的因素,计算相对风险比(RRR),并以95%的置信区间调整相对风险比(aRRR)。结果在777名参与者中(60.7%为男性,71.6%为黑人,中位年龄52岁),29.2%报告过去一个月使用过注射药物。据报道,海洛因/芬太尼(79.5%)、快克可卡因(43.2%)和粉末可卡因(9.3%)每天或几乎每天使用。出现了四种不同的吸毒模式:不注射/使用频率较低的可卡因(42.0%)、注射/使用频率较低的可卡因(9.3%)、不注射/使用频率较高的可卡因(28.8%)和注射/使用频率较高的可卡因(19.9%)。与注射和高频率可卡因使用组成员显著相关的因素包括:过量使用史(aRRR=2.58, 95% CI= 1.52-4.38)、高过量使用风险的戒断行为(aRRR=1.29, 95% CI= 1.14-1.46)、多地点使用(aRRR=1.09, 95% CI= 1.02-1.18)。结论:近五分之一的阿片类药物使用者报告有注射用药和高频率可卡因使用,高频率可卡因使用与高过量风险相关。迫切需要针对多种物质使用模式、社会网络和环境因素的有针对性的干预措施,以减少对这一高危人群的伤害。
{"title":"The relationship between injection status, cocaine use, overdose, and drug-related behaviors among people who use opioids","authors":"Carl A. Latkin ,&nbsp;Lauren Dayton ,&nbsp;Haley Bonneau ,&nbsp;Melissa A. Davey-Rothwell ,&nbsp;Grace Tian Yi ,&nbsp;Kaori Suga ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100398","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100398","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The co-use of opioids and stimulants is associated with elevated health risks. This study examined patterns of injection drug use and cocaine use frequency among people who use opioids.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional data were collected from community-recruited adults who use opioids in Baltimore, Maryland, between December 7, 2022 and January 26, 2025. Participants were categorized into four groups based on injection status and cocaine use frequency. Multinomial logistic regression examined factors associated with group membership, calculating relative risk ratios (RRR) and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) with 95 % confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 777 participants (60.7 % male, 71.6 % Black, median age 52), 29.2 % reported past-month injection drug use. Daily/almost daily use was reported for heroin/fentanyl (79.5 %), crack cocaine (43.2 %), and powder cocaine (9.3 %). Four distinct drug use patterns emerged: not inject/lower frequency cocaine use (42.0 %), inject/lower frequency cocaine use (9.3 %), not inject/higher frequency cocaine use (28.8 %), and inject/higher frequency cocaine use (19.9 %). Factors significantly associated with injecting and higher frequency cocaine use group membership included: overdose history (aRRR=2.58, 95 % CI=1.52–4.38), withdrawal behavior with high overdose risk (aRRR=1.29, 95 % CI=1.14–1.46), and using in multiple locations (aRRR=1.09, 95 % CI=1.02–1.18).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nearly one-fifth of people who use opioids reported both injection drug use and high-frequency cocaine use, and greater frequency of cocaine use was associated with higher overdose risk. Targeted interventions addressing polysubstance use patterns, social networks, and environmental factors are urgently needed to reduce harm among this high-risk population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multilevel determinants of medication preferences for opioid use disorder among criminal-legal-involved populations: Insights from a scoping review 犯罪-法律相关人群中阿片类药物使用障碍药物偏好的多层次决定因素:来自范围审查的见解
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100395
Amelia Bailey , Jaclyn M.W. Hughto , Claudia Stagoff-Belfort , Shira I. Dunsiger , Rosemarie A. Martin

Background

Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) hold varying perceptions of the three medications to treat OUD (MOUD). Data on these perceptions among those with criminal-legal involvement is limited. To optimize MOUD service delivery, especially in criminal-legal settings, it is essential to explore the preferences and attitudes of those with legal involvement.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review of literature published via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and SocINDEX (January 1, 2014-September 17, 2024). Three-stage screening process was employed by two reviewers: title/abstract (n = 2085 articles), full-text (n = 88), and data extraction of 44 articles included in the final sample. Content analysis was used to understand preferences/attitudes toward MOUD and related influential factors.

Results

Factors that influenced MOUD preferences/attitudes were clustered in positive (n = 39 articles; i.e., like), negative (n = 38; i.e., dislike), or mixed (n = 20; both positive and negative) valences. Methadone was the most referenced (n = 30), with more articles noting negative attitudes than positive. Fewer studies focused on oral buprenorphine (n = 18), with balanced positive and negative views. Seven articles on injectable MOUD highlighted mostly positive attitudes. Factors shaping preferences/attitudes spanned from individual to structural levels. Common factors associated with negative preferences included MOUD program rules, side or adverse effects, and drug-free ideology. Positive preferences were often engendered by flexible MOUD delivery and beliefs about MOUD. Influential factors differed by MOUD type.

Conclusions

Preferences/attitudes toward MOUD among criminal-legal-involved populations are shaped by intersecting multilevel determinants and differ by MOUD type. Identified factors might serve as intervention targets to better meet individuals’ needs.
背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者对治疗OUD的三种药物有不同的看法。涉及刑事法律案件的人对这些看法的数据有限。为了优化mod服务的提供,特别是在刑事法律环境中,有必要探讨那些涉及法律的人的偏好和态度。方法对2014年1月1日至2024年9月17日期间通过PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、PsycInfo和SocINDEX等网站发表的文献进行范围综述。两名审稿人采用三阶段筛选流程:标题/摘要(n = 2085篇)、全文(n = 88篇)和最终样本中44篇文章的数据提取。采用内容分析法了解对mod的偏好/态度及相关影响因素。结果影响mod偏好/态度的因素聚集在积极(n = 39篇,即喜欢)、消极(n = 38篇,即不喜欢)或混合(n = 20篇,既积极又消极)的效价中。美沙酮被引用最多(n = 30),负面态度多于正面态度。较少的研究关注于口服丁丙诺啡(n = 18),有平衡的正面和负面观点。七篇关于注射用mod的文章强调了大多数积极的态度。影响偏好/态度的因素从个人层面到结构层面都有。与消极偏好相关的常见因素包括mod程序规则、副作用和无毒意识形态。积极的偏好通常是由灵活的mod传递和对mod的信念产生的。影响因素因霉菌类型而异。结论犯罪-法律相关人群对犯罪行为的参考/态度受到多重因素的交叉影响,并因犯罪行为类型而有所差异。确定的因素可以作为干预目标,以更好地满足个人的需求。
{"title":"Multilevel determinants of medication preferences for opioid use disorder among criminal-legal-involved populations: Insights from a scoping review","authors":"Amelia Bailey ,&nbsp;Jaclyn M.W. Hughto ,&nbsp;Claudia Stagoff-Belfort ,&nbsp;Shira I. Dunsiger ,&nbsp;Rosemarie A. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100395","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100395","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) hold varying perceptions of the three medications to treat OUD (MOUD). Data on these perceptions among those with criminal-legal involvement is limited. To optimize MOUD service delivery, especially in criminal-legal settings, it is essential to explore the preferences and attitudes of those with legal involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review of literature published via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and SocINDEX (January 1, 2014-September 17, 2024). Three-stage screening process was employed by two reviewers: title/abstract (n = 2085 articles), full-text (n = 88), and data extraction of 44 articles included in the final sample. Content analysis was used to understand preferences/attitudes toward MOUD and related influential factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Factors that influenced MOUD preferences/attitudes were clustered in positive (n = 39 articles; i.e., like), negative (n = 38; i.e., dislike), or mixed (n = 20; both positive and negative) valences. Methadone was the most referenced (n = 30), with more articles noting negative attitudes than positive. Fewer studies focused on oral buprenorphine (n = 18), with balanced positive and negative views. Seven articles on injectable MOUD highlighted mostly positive attitudes. Factors shaping preferences/attitudes spanned from individual to structural levels. Common factors associated with negative preferences included MOUD program rules, side or adverse effects, and drug-free ideology. Positive preferences were often engendered by flexible MOUD delivery and beliefs about MOUD. Influential factors differed by MOUD type.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preferences/attitudes toward MOUD among criminal-legal-involved populations are shaped by intersecting multilevel determinants and differ by MOUD type. Identified factors might serve as intervention targets to better meet individuals’ needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145571739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinically characterizing adults who use kava or kratom: Substance use disorder assessment challenges for increasingly popular botanical products 临床特征的成年人使用卡瓦或克拉托姆:物质使用障碍评估挑战日益流行的植物产品
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100394
Katherine Hill , Edward W. Boyer , Kirsten E. Smith

Background

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) and kava (Piper methysticum) are psychoactive botanicals with growing popularity We aimed to characterize the clinical characteristics of people who have consumed these products.

Methods

We conducted an online survey of US adults who have used kava or kratom. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) substance use disorder (SUD) criteria were used to assess symptoms related to past-year kratom and/or kava use. Respondents were also asked to report on the compatibility of kava and kratom effects with daily living.

Results

Of the 367 participants, 91.3 % reported lifetime kratom use and 49.0 % reported lifetime kava use. There was substantial overlap of lifetime use of both substances (40.3 %). Past-year SUD diagnostic criteria for kratom were met by 38.1 % of participants; when this group was dichotomized by past-year kava use, those who also co-used kava had higher proportions of endorsing symptoms of “using more kratom than intended” and “needing to use larger amounts to feel the same effect” than those who used kratom without kava (p = 0.032 and p = 0.011, respectively). Meeting SUD criteria for kava was uncommon among those reporting past-year use (7.5 %), regardless of past-year kratom use. Kratom effects were perceived as helpful and compatible with daily living, though fewer reported this for kava effects.

Conclusions

Assessment of patients using kratom or kava may become challenging due to co-use. The relative rewarding and reinforcing effects of these botanicals alone or combined requires systematic study. SUD for either is possible but should be contextualized by patient-level factors including other substance use.
kratom (Mitragyna speciosa)和kava (Piper methysticum)是越来越受欢迎的精神活性植物药物,我们旨在描述食用这些产品的人的临床特征。方法我们对使用过卡瓦茶或卡托姆茶的美国成年人进行了一项在线调查。使用诊断与统计手册-5 (DSM-5)物质使用障碍(SUD)标准来评估与过去一年kratom和/或kava使用相关的症状。受访者还被要求报告kava和kratom效应与日常生活的兼容性。结果在367名参与者中,91.3%的人报告终生使用卡瓦,49.0%的人报告终生使用卡瓦。两种物质的终生使用存在大量重叠(40.3%)。38.1%的参与者符合过去一年的kratom SUD诊断标准;当这一组按过去一年的卡瓦使用情况进行二分类时,那些同时使用卡瓦的人比那些不使用卡瓦的人有更高比例的认同“使用比预期更多的卡瓦”和“需要使用更多的卡瓦才能达到同样的效果”的症状(p = 0.032和p = 0.011分别)。无论过去一年的kratom使用情况如何,在报告过去一年使用kava的患者中,符合SUD标准的情况并不常见(7.5%)。克拉托姆效应被认为是有益的,与日常生活相适应,尽管很少有人报道卡瓦效应。结论对使用kratom或kava的患者进行评估可能会因共同使用而变得具有挑战性。这些植物药单独或联合的相对奖励和强化作用需要系统的研究。任何一种都可能出现SUD,但应根据患者层面的因素(包括其他物质使用)进行背景分析。
{"title":"Clinically characterizing adults who use kava or kratom: Substance use disorder assessment challenges for increasingly popular botanical products","authors":"Katherine Hill ,&nbsp;Edward W. Boyer ,&nbsp;Kirsten E. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100394","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100394","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Kratom (<em>Mitragyna speciosa</em>) and kava (<em>Piper methysticum</em>) are psychoactive botanicals with growing popularity We aimed to characterize the clinical characteristics of people who have consumed these products.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an online survey of US adults who have used kava or kratom. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) substance use disorder (SUD) criteria were used to assess symptoms related to past-year kratom and/or kava use. Respondents were also asked to report on the compatibility of kava and kratom effects with daily living.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 367 participants, 91.3 % reported lifetime kratom use and 49.0 % reported lifetime kava use. There was substantial overlap of lifetime use of both substances (40.3 %). Past-year SUD diagnostic criteria for kratom were met by 38.1 % of participants; when this group was dichotomized by past-year kava use, those who also co-used kava had higher proportions of endorsing symptoms of “using more kratom than intended” and “needing to use larger amounts to feel the same effect” than those who used kratom without kava (p = 0.032 and p = 0.011, respectively). Meeting SUD criteria for kava was uncommon among those reporting past-year use (7.5 %), regardless of past-year kratom use. Kratom effects were perceived as helpful and compatible with daily living, though fewer reported this for kava effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Assessment of patients using kratom or kava may become challenging due to co-use. The relative rewarding and reinforcing effects of these botanicals alone or combined requires systematic study. SUD for either is possible but should be contextualized by patient-level factors including other substance use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145520067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utility of substance-free alternatives in treating and preventing harmful substance use: A narrative review of the translational research spectrum 无物质替代品在治疗和预防有害物质使用中的效用:对转化研究光谱的叙述回顾
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100393
Justin T. Van Heukelom, Lesleigh A. Stinson, Jalie A. Tucker
Interventions primarily focused on constraining access to substances have largely failed to reduce substance use and associated harms. Alternative approaches informed by behavioral theories of choice focus on reducing harmful substance use by increasing access to and engagement in substance-free rewards that can compete with substance use. This narrative review of the translational research spectrum, organized by research phases in the Food and Drug Administration’s Drug Approval Process, summarizes wide-ranging research on associations between substance-free alternatives (palatable stimuli, money, social interaction, physical activity) and substance use and related harms. Studies reviewed span laboratory experiments with nonhuman animals to human experiments and treatment and prevention research. With limited exceptions, research across the translational spectrum supported the role of substance-free alternative rewards in reducing harmful substance use. Effective substitutes for substance use under specific conditions included palatable stimuli in animal studies and monetary incentives and social interaction opportunities with non-substance using peers in human studies. Evidence for physical activity was mixed, with stronger support found in animal than human research. Emerging research further suggests that increasing access to substance-free activities in broader socioecological contexts surrounding harmful use (e.g., communities, drug-related policy) also are needed. Increasing access to substance-free rewards through individual- and community-level interventions is a promising alternative to conventional approaches that primarily focus on reducing substance use and related negative consequences by constraining access to substances. Community-level and public health policy efforts guided by behavioral theories of choice merit further development and evaluation.
主要侧重于限制获取药物的干预措施在很大程度上未能减少药物使用和相关危害。根据行为选择理论提供的替代方法侧重于通过增加获得和参与可与物质使用竞争的无物质奖励来减少有害物质的使用。本文根据美国食品和药物管理局(fda)的药物批准程序(Drug Approval Process)的研究阶段,对转化研究谱进行了叙述性回顾,总结了关于无物质替代品(可口的刺激、金钱、社会互动、身体活动)与物质使用及其相关危害之间关系的广泛研究。回顾的研究涵盖了非人类动物的实验室实验到人类实验以及治疗和预防研究。除了有限的例外,整个转化谱的研究都支持无物质替代奖励在减少有害物质使用方面的作用。在特定条件下物质使用的有效替代品包括动物研究中的美味刺激和人类研究中与不使用物质的同伴的金钱奖励和社会互动机会。体育锻炼的证据好坏参半,在动物身上的研究比在人类身上的研究得到了更有力的支持。新出现的研究进一步表明,还需要在围绕有害使用的更广泛的社会生态背景下(例如,社区、与毒品有关的政策)增加获得无物质活动的机会。通过个人和社区一级的干预措施增加获得无物质奖励的机会,是主要侧重于通过限制获取物质来减少物质使用和相关负面后果的传统方法的一个有希望的替代方法。以行为选择理论为指导的社区和公共卫生政策努力值得进一步发展和评估。
{"title":"Utility of substance-free alternatives in treating and preventing harmful substance use: A narrative review of the translational research spectrum","authors":"Justin T. Van Heukelom,&nbsp;Lesleigh A. Stinson,&nbsp;Jalie A. Tucker","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100393","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100393","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interventions primarily focused on constraining access to substances have largely failed to reduce substance use and associated harms. Alternative approaches informed by behavioral theories of choice focus on reducing harmful substance use by increasing access to and engagement in substance-free rewards that can compete with substance use. This narrative review of the translational research spectrum, organized by research phases in the Food and Drug Administration’s Drug Approval Process, summarizes wide-ranging research on associations between substance-free alternatives (palatable stimuli, money, social interaction, physical activity) and substance use and related harms. Studies reviewed span laboratory experiments with nonhuman animals to human experiments and treatment and prevention research. With limited exceptions, research across the translational spectrum supported the role of substance-free alternative rewards in reducing harmful substance use. Effective substitutes for substance use under specific conditions included palatable stimuli in animal studies and monetary incentives and social interaction opportunities with non-substance using peers in human studies. Evidence for physical activity was mixed, with stronger support found in animal than human research. Emerging research further suggests that increasing access to substance-free activities in broader socioecological contexts surrounding harmful use (e.g., communities, drug-related policy) also are needed. Increasing access to substance-free rewards through individual- and community-level interventions is a promising alternative to conventional approaches that primarily focus on reducing substance use and related negative consequences by constraining access to substances. Community-level and public health policy efforts guided by behavioral theories of choice merit further development and evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145520068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New methodology to improve tracking of Veteran overdose deaths and characterization of a population of Veteran overdose decedents in San Diego County 改进退伍军人过量死亡跟踪和圣地亚哥县退伍军人过量死亡人群特征的新方法
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100392
Benjamin I. Felleman , Neal M. Doran , Octaviana Hemmy Asamsama , Elizabeth M. Oliva , Benjamin H. Han
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>National trends indicate that drug-related deaths among Veterans have been increasing from 2010 to 2019. The present study involves a recent analysis of drug mortality data for a single large Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. The aims of the study included (1) the identification of VA patients with drug-related deaths, (2) patient characteristics and service utilization patterns of VA patients with drug-related deaths, and (3) the evaluation of existing internal tracking systems for monitoring drug-related deaths.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study matched VA enrollment records to San Diego County Medical Examiner (ME) data from January 2019 to June 2023. The records of individuals who died of a drug-related overdose in San Diego County were matched to VA medical records. Chart reviews were conducted to evaluate the extent to which intentional and accidental overdose events were documented in electronic medical records, and to examine demographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization in Veterans who died by overdose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From January 2019 to June 2023 there were a total of 140 drug overdose deaths, 91.4 % were accidental (<em>n</em> = 128) and 8.6 % were intentional (n = 12). Prior to ME data matching, VA records captured 9.6 % of accidental drug overdoses (n = 15) and 100 % of intentional drug overdoses (n = 12). Fentanyl or fentanyl analogs were involved in 37.1 % (n = 52) of intentional and unintentional drug overdose deaths with the combination of fentanyl and methamphetamine being the next most specific common cause of death (n = 30; 21.4 %). In terms of VA healthcare utilization, in the year prior to their death, 63.6 % of Veterans accessed care. Among those 89<!--> <!-->VA patients, they most commonly utilized the emergency department (75 %) and primary care (56.2 %). Among the 20 % of Veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD), in the year prior to their death, 39.3 % were dispensed a prescription for naloxone and 35.7 % were dispensed a medication for OUD.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Comparing VA records to county ME records revealed that VA records missed over 80 % of drug-related overdose deaths—4 out of every 5 deaths. While accurate for intentional overdoses, accidental overdoses—which comprise the vast majority of drug overdose deaths—were missing over 90 % of the time. Given that drug toxicology results were consistent with county trends, this suggests that VA records severely underestimate drug overdose deaths. Approximately two-thirds of VA patients who died of drug overdose access VA and most were seen in the emergency department and over half in primary care—identifying these as important intervention targets for overdose prevention. Given the gaps in capturing drug overdose deaths, other healthcare systems looking to prevent overdose deaths, and especially other VA systems, may want to consider adopting si
全国趋势表明,从2010年到2019年,退伍军人中与毒品有关的死亡人数一直在增加。本研究涉及一个单一的大型退伍军人事务(VA)医疗保健系统的药物死亡率数据的最新分析。本研究的目的包括:(1)识别与药物相关死亡的退伍军人事务部患者,(2)与药物相关死亡的退伍军人事务部患者特征和服务利用模式,以及(3)评估现有的内部药物相关死亡监测系统。方法本回顾性研究将退伍军人管理局登记记录与圣地亚哥县法医(ME) 2019年1月至2023年6月的数据相匹配。圣地亚哥县死于药物过量的个人记录与退伍军人事务部的医疗记录相匹配。进行了图表审查,以评估电子医疗记录中记录的故意和意外过量事件的程度,并检查因过量死亡的退伍军人的人口统计学和临床特征以及医疗保健利用情况。结果2019年1月至2023年6月,共发生140例药物过量死亡,其中91.4%为意外死亡(n = 128), 8.6%为故意死亡(n = 12)。在ME数据匹配之前,VA记录捕获了9.6%的意外药物过量(n = 15)和100%的故意药物过量(n = 12)。芬太尼或芬太尼类似物涉及37.1% (n = 52)的故意和非故意药物过量死亡,芬太尼和甲基苯丙胺的组合是下一个最具体的常见死亡原因(n = 30; 21.4%)。在VA医疗保健利用方面,在他们去世前一年,63.6%的退伍军人获得了医疗保健。在这89名VA患者中,他们最常使用急诊科(75%)和初级保健(56.2%)。在20%患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的退伍军人中,在他们死亡前一年,39.3%的人开具了纳洛酮处方,35.7%的人开具了用于OUD的药物。将退伍军人管理局的记录与县ME记录进行比较发现,退伍军人管理局的记录遗漏了80%以上与药物有关的过量死亡——每5例死亡中就有4例死亡。虽然对故意过量用药是准确的,但意外过量用药——占药物过量死亡的绝大多数——在90%以上的时间里都遗漏了。鉴于药物毒理学结果与县趋势一致,这表明VA记录严重低估了药物过量死亡。大约三分之二死于药物过量的退伍军人事务部患者进入退伍军人事务部就诊,其中大多数在急诊科就诊,一半以上在初级保健部门就诊,这是预防药物过量的重要干预目标。鉴于在捕获药物过量死亡方面的差距,其他医疗保健系统希望防止过量死亡,特别是其他VA系统,可能需要考虑采用类似的方法,以更好地捕获和了解影响患者群体中药物过量死亡的因素。
{"title":"New methodology to improve tracking of Veteran overdose deaths and characterization of a population of Veteran overdose decedents in San Diego County","authors":"Benjamin I. Felleman ,&nbsp;Neal M. Doran ,&nbsp;Octaviana Hemmy Asamsama ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Oliva ,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Han","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100392","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100392","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;National trends indicate that drug-related deaths among Veterans have been increasing from 2010 to 2019. The present study involves a recent analysis of drug mortality data for a single large Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. The aims of the study included (1) the identification of VA patients with drug-related deaths, (2) patient characteristics and service utilization patterns of VA patients with drug-related deaths, and (3) the evaluation of existing internal tracking systems for monitoring drug-related deaths.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This retrospective study matched VA enrollment records to San Diego County Medical Examiner (ME) data from January 2019 to June 2023. The records of individuals who died of a drug-related overdose in San Diego County were matched to VA medical records. Chart reviews were conducted to evaluate the extent to which intentional and accidental overdose events were documented in electronic medical records, and to examine demographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization in Veterans who died by overdose.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;From January 2019 to June 2023 there were a total of 140 drug overdose deaths, 91.4 % were accidental (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 128) and 8.6 % were intentional (n = 12). Prior to ME data matching, VA records captured 9.6 % of accidental drug overdoses (n = 15) and 100 % of intentional drug overdoses (n = 12). Fentanyl or fentanyl analogs were involved in 37.1 % (n = 52) of intentional and unintentional drug overdose deaths with the combination of fentanyl and methamphetamine being the next most specific common cause of death (n = 30; 21.4 %). In terms of VA healthcare utilization, in the year prior to their death, 63.6 % of Veterans accessed care. Among those 89&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;VA patients, they most commonly utilized the emergency department (75 %) and primary care (56.2 %). Among the 20 % of Veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD), in the year prior to their death, 39.3 % were dispensed a prescription for naloxone and 35.7 % were dispensed a medication for OUD.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Discussion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Comparing VA records to county ME records revealed that VA records missed over 80 % of drug-related overdose deaths—4 out of every 5 deaths. While accurate for intentional overdoses, accidental overdoses—which comprise the vast majority of drug overdose deaths—were missing over 90 % of the time. Given that drug toxicology results were consistent with county trends, this suggests that VA records severely underestimate drug overdose deaths. Approximately two-thirds of VA patients who died of drug overdose access VA and most were seen in the emergency department and over half in primary care—identifying these as important intervention targets for overdose prevention. Given the gaps in capturing drug overdose deaths, other healthcare systems looking to prevent overdose deaths, and especially other VA systems, may want to consider adopting si","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145520069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preferences for harm reduction vending machine design among rural people who use drugs 农村吸毒人群对减害贩卖机设计的偏好
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-10-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100391
April M. Young , Tasfia Jahangir , Susan Westneat , Chelsi Cheatom , Amanda Fallin-Bennett , Laura C. Fanucchi , Patricia R. Freeman , Jennifer R. Havens , Hannah K. Knudsen , Kathryn E. McCollister , Susannah Stitzer , Jack Stone , Peter Vickerman , Melvin D. Livingston
Globally, harm reduction vending machines (HRVMs) have been used for decades to dispense safe injection equipment and other supplies to people who use drugs (PWUD). However, HRVMs have only recently scaled up in the U.S. and few operate in rural settings. This study describes preferences for HRVM design among rural PWUD in two Appalachian Kentucky communities. Peer-referral and outreach were used to recruit participants (n = 731). Eligibility criteria were ≥ 18 years, residing in the target counties, and having used any drug (excluding alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco) to get high within 6 months. Interviewer-administered questionnaires elicited data on behavioral/demographic characteristics and HRVM design preferences. Sample characteristics and site-level differences were estimated accounting for peer-referral chain clustering. Naloxone was the most desired supply (95.6 %), followed by syringes (94.5 %) and fentanyl test strips (83.7 %). Supplies for basic needs were popular, including water (82.6 %), food (72.8 %), and personal care kits (71.3 %). The most endorsed location was the health department (71.1 %). More than twice the number of participants wanted HRVMs installed outdoors (52.3 %) rather than indoors (19.6 %), but for 25.4 %, indoor/outdoor installation preference varies depending on the venue. While over three-quarters reported that a surveillance camera would not affect their HRVM use, a substantial minority indicated it would be a deterrent, highlighting a key consideration for implementation. There were significant differences in supply and location preferences across the two communities. HRVMs may expand harm reduction service access in rural settings, but PWUD input is needed to ensure that their design responds to community needs.
Clinical Trials Registration
NCT05657106
在全球范围内,几十年来一直使用减少伤害自动售货机向吸毒者分发安全注射设备和其他用品(PWUD)。然而,hrvm最近才在美国扩大规模,很少在农村地区开展业务。本研究描述了肯塔基州两个阿巴拉契亚社区农村PWUD对HRVM设计的偏好。采用同伴推荐和外展方法招募参与者(n = 731)。入选标准为≥18岁,居住在目标县,并且在6个月内使用过任何药物(不包括酒精、大麻和烟草)获得快感。采访者通过问卷调查获取行为/人口统计学特征和HRVM设计偏好的数据。考虑到同行推荐链聚类,估计了样本特征和站点水平差异。纳洛酮用量最大(95.6%),其次是注射器(94.5%)和芬太尼试纸条(83.7%)。基本需求的供应很受欢迎,包括水(82.6%)、食物(72.8%)和个人护理包(71.3%)。最受认可的地点是卫生部门(71.1%)。超过两倍的参与者希望将hrvm安装在室外(52.3%)而不是室内(19.6%),但25.4%的人希望将hrvm安装在室内/室外,这取决于场地。虽然超过四分之三的人报告说监控摄像头不会影响他们对HRVM的使用,但相当一部分人表示这将是一种威慑,突出了实施的一个关键考虑因素。两个社区在供应和地点偏好方面存在显著差异。hrvm可以在农村地区扩大减少伤害服务的可及性,但需要puwud的投入,以确保其设计符合社区需求。临床试验注册nct05657106
{"title":"Preferences for harm reduction vending machine design among rural people who use drugs","authors":"April M. Young ,&nbsp;Tasfia Jahangir ,&nbsp;Susan Westneat ,&nbsp;Chelsi Cheatom ,&nbsp;Amanda Fallin-Bennett ,&nbsp;Laura C. Fanucchi ,&nbsp;Patricia R. Freeman ,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Havens ,&nbsp;Hannah K. Knudsen ,&nbsp;Kathryn E. McCollister ,&nbsp;Susannah Stitzer ,&nbsp;Jack Stone ,&nbsp;Peter Vickerman ,&nbsp;Melvin D. Livingston","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100391","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100391","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, harm reduction vending machines (HRVMs) have been used for decades to dispense safe injection equipment and other supplies to people who use drugs (PWUD). However, HRVMs have only recently scaled up in the U.S. and few operate in rural settings. This study describes preferences for HRVM design among rural PWUD in two Appalachian Kentucky communities. Peer-referral and outreach were used to recruit participants (n = 731). Eligibility criteria were ≥ 18 years, residing in the target counties, and having used any drug (excluding alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco) to get high within 6 months. Interviewer-administered questionnaires elicited data on behavioral/demographic characteristics and HRVM design preferences. Sample characteristics and site-level differences were estimated accounting for peer-referral chain clustering. Naloxone was the most desired supply (95.6 %), followed by syringes (94.5 %) and fentanyl test strips (83.7 %). Supplies for basic needs were popular, including water (82.6 %), food (72.8 %), and personal care kits (71.3 %). The most endorsed location was the health department (71.1 %). More than twice the number of participants wanted HRVMs installed outdoors (52.3 %) rather than indoors (19.6 %), but for 25.4 %, indoor/outdoor installation preference varies depending on the venue. While over three-quarters reported that a surveillance camera would not affect their HRVM use, a substantial minority indicated it would be a deterrent, highlighting a key consideration for implementation. There were significant differences in supply and location preferences across the two communities. HRVMs may expand harm reduction service access in rural settings, but PWUD input is needed to ensure that their design responds to community needs.</div><div>Clinical Trials Registration</div><div>NCT05657106</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145571738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mothers and fathers who use medical cannabis: A comparison of sociodemographic characteristics, cannabis use, and health 使用医用大麻的母亲和父亲:社会人口特征、大麻使用和健康的比较
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100390
Janna Ataiants, Ekaterina V. Fedorova, Ojaswini D. Parab, Maddy Finkelstein, Elizabeth S. Valdez, Olivia Cordingley, Stephen E. Lankenau

Background

While increasing numbers of parents use medical cannabis, little is known about their cannabis use or health, despite potential implications for child well-being. Recognizing that parenting is shaped by gendered roles and norms, this study compared mothers and fathers who use cannabis as medical cannabis patients.

Methods

Parents living with children (N = 372; 62.9 % mothers, 37.1 % fathers) were identified from an ongoing study of Pennsylvania-based medical cannabis patients. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed sociodemographic, cannabis use, and health characteristics by parent’s sex.

Results

Compared to fathers, mothers were less likely to be married, have a higher income, report arrest history, veteran status, and lifetime opioid misuse, and more likely to report PTSD (all p < 0.05). Problematic cannabis use did not significantly differ by parent’s sex (mothers: 15.0 %; fathers: 20.3 %). However, mothers had lower odds of using concentrates (AOR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.33–0.96) and higher odds of using capsules (AOR: 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.09–3.19), tinctures (AOR: 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.01–2.87), using at specific times (AOR: 1.85, 95 % CI: 1.08–3.16), and using alone (AOR: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.02–3.14). Mothers also had higher odds of frequent sleep problems (AOR: 1.96, 95 % CI: 1.18–3.25) and moderate-to-severe anxiety (AOR: 1.91, 95 % CI: 1.14–3.20).

Discussion

Mothers showed greater socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated anxiety and sleep disturbances, and more discreet cannabis use, while fathers had more flexible use patterns and fewer anxiety symptoms, despite greater lifetime adversity. These differences highlight the need for gender-responsive programs to support parents who use medical cannabis.
虽然越来越多的父母使用医用大麻,但人们对他们的大麻使用情况或健康状况知之甚少,尽管这可能对儿童福祉产生影响。认识到育儿受到性别角色和规范的影响,本研究将使用大麻的母亲和父亲作为医用大麻患者进行了比较。方法从一项正在进行的宾夕法尼亚州医用大麻患者研究中确定与孩子一起生活的父母(N = 372,其中62.9%为母亲,37.1%为父亲)。双变量和多变量分析评估了按父母性别划分的社会人口、大麻使用和健康特征。结果与父亲相比,母亲结婚、收入较高、报告逮捕史、退伍军人身份和终生滥用阿片类药物的可能性较低,报告PTSD的可能性较高(p < 0.05)。有问题的大麻使用情况在父母性别方面没有显著差异(母亲:15.0%;父亲:20.3%)。然而,母亲使用浓缩液(AOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33-0.96)的几率较低,而使用胶囊(AOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.09-3.19)、酊剂(AOR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.01-2.87)、特定时间使用(AOR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.08-3.16)和单独使用(AOR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.02-3.14)的几率较高。母亲也有更高的几率经常出现睡眠问题(AOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.18-3.25)和中度至重度焦虑(AOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.14-3.20)。母亲表现出更大的社会经济脆弱性,焦虑和睡眠障碍加剧,更谨慎地使用大麻,而父亲的使用模式更灵活,焦虑症状更少,尽管一生的逆境更大。这些差异突出表明,需要制定促进性别平等的方案,以支持使用医用大麻的父母。
{"title":"Mothers and fathers who use medical cannabis: A comparison of sociodemographic characteristics, cannabis use, and health","authors":"Janna Ataiants,&nbsp;Ekaterina V. Fedorova,&nbsp;Ojaswini D. Parab,&nbsp;Maddy Finkelstein,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Valdez,&nbsp;Olivia Cordingley,&nbsp;Stephen E. Lankenau","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100390","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100390","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While increasing numbers of parents use medical cannabis, little is known about their cannabis use or health, despite potential implications for child well-being. Recognizing that parenting is shaped by gendered roles and norms, this study compared mothers and fathers who use cannabis as medical cannabis patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Parents living with children (N = 372; 62.9 % mothers, 37.1 % fathers) were identified from an ongoing study of Pennsylvania-based medical cannabis patients. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed sociodemographic, cannabis use, and health characteristics by parent’s sex.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to fathers, mothers were less likely to be married, have a higher income, report arrest history, veteran status, and lifetime opioid misuse, and more likely to report PTSD (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Problematic cannabis use did not significantly differ by parent’s sex (mothers: 15.0 %; fathers: 20.3 %). However, mothers had lower odds of using concentrates (AOR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.33–0.96) and higher odds of using capsules (AOR: 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.09–3.19), tinctures (AOR: 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.01–2.87), using at specific times (AOR: 1.85, 95 % CI: 1.08–3.16), and using alone (AOR: 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.02–3.14). Mothers also had higher odds of frequent sleep problems (AOR: 1.96, 95 % CI: 1.18–3.25) and moderate-to-severe anxiety (AOR: 1.91, 95 % CI: 1.14–3.20).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Mothers showed greater socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated anxiety and sleep disturbances, and more discreet cannabis use, while fathers had more flexible use patterns and fewer anxiety symptoms, despite greater lifetime adversity. These differences highlight the need for gender-responsive programs to support parents who use medical cannabis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145416654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nicotine pouch pharmacokinetics compared to smoked tobacco: A systematic review and meta-analysis 与吸烟相比,尼古丁囊药代动力学:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 2.9 Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100389
Javad Heshmati , Emma Lynn Bates , Spencer Shahen , Sarah Visintini , Evyanne Quirouette , Kerri-Anne Mullen , Hassan Mir
Nicotine pouches (NP) are novel agents that deliver nicotine through buccal absorption as opposed to combustion. They are proposed as a harm reduction tool compared to smoking tobacco. However, there is limited evidence on their efficacy and safety. This review article summarizes the current evidence regarding NP pharmacokinetics compared to conventional tobacco products. We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Scopus for studies that assessed pharmacokinetic parameters of nicotine pouches. We identified studies involving tobacco-dependent adults and examined pharmacokinetic parameters such as total exposure, peak concentration, and time to peak. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes. The Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of seven RCTs and crossover trials were included. Five compared NP pharmacokinetics with smoked tobacco, while two used moist snuff as comparators. Total nicotine exposure was significantly lower with 1.5 mg and 2 mg pouches, similar with 3.5 mg and 4 mg pouches, and significantly higher with pouches containing 8 mg or more when compared to cigarettes. A meta-analysis of three trials showed that 4 mg pouches delivered 91.73 % (95 % CI 85.03 %–98.42 %) of cigarette total nicotine exposure. Peak concentration was significantly lower with 1.5 mg, 2 mg, and 3.5 mg pouches while higher concentration pouches had greater peak when compared to cigarettes. A meta-analysis of three trials showed that 4 mg pouches showed a peak nicotine concentration of 69.15 % (95 % CI 58.55 %–79.76 %) compared with cigarettes. Peak nicotine concentration was consistently achieved earlier with cigarettes (5–8 min) than with pouches (20–65 min). Despite their buccal absorption, 4 mg pouches (most commonly used), deliver similar total nicotine exposure to cigarettes, though with lower peak concentrations and slower absorption. When combined with their flavours and aggressive marketing to youth, this raises concerns about the potential of nicotine pouches to cause nicotine dependence, especially among those using the product recreationally.
尼古丁袋(NP)是一种通过口腔吸收而不是燃烧来输送尼古丁的新型药物。与吸烟相比,它们被认为是一种减少危害的工具。然而,关于它们的有效性和安全性的证据有限。这篇综述文章总结了目前关于NP药代动力学的证据与传统烟草制品的比较。我们检索了Medline、Embase、CENTRAL和Scopus,寻找评估尼古丁小袋药代动力学参数的研究。我们确定了涉及烟草依赖成人的研究,并检查了药代动力学参数,如总暴露量、峰值浓度和达到峰值的时间。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算合并效应大小。采用Cochrane ROB 2.0工具评价纳入研究的偏倚风险。共纳入7项随机对照试验和交叉试验。其中5人比较了NP与吸烟烟草的药代动力学,2人使用湿鼻烟作为比较物。与香烟相比,每袋1.5毫克和2毫克的尼古丁暴露量明显较低,每袋3.5毫克和4毫克的尼古丁暴露量相似,每袋8毫克或更多的尼古丁暴露量明显较高。三项试验的荟萃分析显示,每包4毫克香烟的尼古丁暴露量占香烟总尼古丁暴露量的91.73% (95% CI 85.03% - 98.42%)。与香烟相比,1.5毫克、2毫克和3.5毫克的袋装香烟的峰值浓度明显较低,而浓度较高的袋装香烟的峰值浓度更高。三项试验的荟萃分析显示,与香烟相比,4毫克的小袋尼古丁的峰值浓度为69.15% (95% CI 58.55% - 79.76%)。香烟(5-8分钟)达到尼古丁浓度峰值的时间一贯早于袋装香烟(20-65分钟)。尽管它们的口腔吸收,4毫克的小袋(最常用的)产生的总尼古丁暴露量与香烟相似,但峰值浓度较低,吸收较慢。再加上它们的口味和对年轻人的积极营销,这引起了人们对尼古丁袋可能导致尼古丁依赖的担忧,尤其是在那些娱乐性使用该产品的人群中。
{"title":"Nicotine pouch pharmacokinetics compared to smoked tobacco: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Javad Heshmati ,&nbsp;Emma Lynn Bates ,&nbsp;Spencer Shahen ,&nbsp;Sarah Visintini ,&nbsp;Evyanne Quirouette ,&nbsp;Kerri-Anne Mullen ,&nbsp;Hassan Mir","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100389","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100389","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nicotine pouches (NP) are novel agents that deliver nicotine through buccal absorption as opposed to combustion. They are proposed as a harm reduction tool compared to smoking tobacco. However, there is limited evidence on their efficacy and safety. This review article summarizes the current evidence regarding NP pharmacokinetics compared to conventional tobacco products. We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Scopus for studies that assessed pharmacokinetic parameters of nicotine pouches. We identified studies involving tobacco-dependent adults and examined pharmacokinetic parameters such as total exposure, peak concentration, and time to peak. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes. The Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of seven RCTs and crossover trials were included. Five compared NP pharmacokinetics with smoked tobacco, while two used moist snuff as comparators. Total nicotine exposure was significantly lower with 1.5<!--> <!-->mg and 2<!--> <!-->mg pouches, similar with 3.5<!--> <!-->mg and 4<!--> <!-->mg pouches, and significantly higher with pouches containing 8<!--> <!-->mg or more when compared to cigarettes. A meta-analysis of three trials showed that 4<!--> <!-->mg pouches delivered 91.73 % (95 % CI 85.03 %–98.42 %) of cigarette total nicotine exposure. Peak concentration was significantly lower with 1.5<!--> <!-->mg, 2<!--> <!-->mg, and 3.5<!--> <!-->mg pouches while higher concentration pouches had greater peak when compared to cigarettes. A meta-analysis of three trials showed that 4<!--> <!-->mg pouches showed a peak nicotine concentration of 69.15 % (95 % CI 58.55 %–79.76 %) compared with cigarettes. Peak nicotine concentration was consistently achieved earlier with cigarettes (5–8<!--> <!-->min) than with pouches (20–65<!--> <!-->min). Despite their buccal absorption, 4<!--> <!-->mg pouches (most commonly used), deliver similar total nicotine exposure to cigarettes, though with lower peak concentrations and slower absorption. When combined with their flavours and aggressive marketing to youth, this raises concerns about the potential of nicotine pouches to cause nicotine dependence, especially among those using the product recreationally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145416655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1