首页 > 最新文献

HRB open research最新文献

英文 中文
An exploration of the social determinants of the health and well-being among older African immigrants living in San Diego. A socio-ecological approach 探讨圣地亚哥非洲裔老年移民健康和福祉的社会决定因素。社会生态方法
Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13820.1
Purity Mwendwa, Tala Al-Rousan
Background As immigration continues to be a global phenomenon, the number of aging immigrants will increase. There is a knowledge gap in the United States on the social determinants of health among older immigrants, especially the older refugee population. We aimed to explore the social determinants of health among older African immigrants living in San Diego, California, and to suggest strategies that can inform the design of health-promoting interventions. Methods We employed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with 11 participants (nine females and two males). We used deductive thematic analysis to explore and analyse the factors that influence their health and well-being based on the five levels of the socio-ecological model (individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy). Results Participants were aged between 62 and 90 years; eight participants had arrived as refugees. Thematic analysis resulted in the following themes within the five levels: individual (pre-migration and migration experiences and impact on health, aging-related health decline, sedentary lifestyle, side effects of medications,language barrier); interpersonal (social support and social participation); organizational (access to healthcare and support services, transportation, - disruption to services due to COVID-19, perception of healthcare and support services); community (social, emotional and practical support, connecting older adults to services) and public policy (financial barriers, immigration policies and legal status). Conclusions Given the distinct linguistic and cultural backgrounds coupled with the unique health needs of our study participants, there is a need for diverse and complementary interventions that seek to build a sense of community and social support for older adults. Such interventions ought to be co-developed with immigrant communities and local organizations to ensure cultural acceptability and effectiveness. Crucially needed are immigration policies that consider the unique situation of older immigrants from low-income backgrounds to ensure equitable access to health and social care services.
背景 随着移民继续成为一种全球现象,老龄移民的人数将会增加。在美国,关于老年移民,尤其是老年难民人口健康的社会决定因素的知识还很匮乏。我们旨在探讨居住在加利福尼亚州圣迭戈市的非洲老年移民的健康社会决定因素,并提出相关策略,为设计促进健康的干预措施提供参考。方法 我们采用定性方法,对 11 名参与者(9 名女性和 2 名男性)进行了半结构式访谈。我们采用演绎主题分析法,根据社会生态模型的五个层次(个人、人际、组织、社区和公共政策)来探索和分析影响他们健康和幸福的因素。结果 参与者的年龄在 62 岁至 90 岁之间,其中 8 人是以难民身份抵达的。通过主题分析,在五个层次中得出了以下主题:个人(移民前和移民经历及其对健康的影响、与衰老相关的健康衰退、久坐不动的生活方式、药物副作用、语言障碍);人际(社会支持和社会参与);组织(获得医疗保健和支持服务的途径、交通、COVID-19 导致的服务中断、对医疗保健和支持服务的看法);社区(社会、情感和实际支持、将老年人与服务联系起来)和公共政策(经济障碍、移民政策和法律地位)。结论 鉴于我们的研究对象具有不同的语言和文化背景以及独特的健康需求,有必要采取多样化和互补性的干预措施,为老年人建立社区感和社会支持。此类干预措施应与移民社区和当地组织共同制定,以确保文化上的可接受性和有效性。至关重要的是,需要制定考虑到低收入背景老年移民特殊情况的移民政策,以确保他们能够公平地获得医疗和社会护理服务。
{"title":"An exploration of the social determinants of the health and well-being among older African immigrants living in San Diego. A socio-ecological approach","authors":"Purity Mwendwa, Tala Al-Rousan","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13820.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13820.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background As immigration continues to be a global phenomenon, the number of aging immigrants will increase. There is a knowledge gap in the United States on the social determinants of health among older immigrants, especially the older refugee population. We aimed to explore the social determinants of health among older African immigrants living in San Diego, California, and to suggest strategies that can inform the design of health-promoting interventions. Methods We employed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with 11 participants (nine females and two males). We used deductive thematic analysis to explore and analyse the factors that influence their health and well-being based on the five levels of the socio-ecological model (individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy). Results Participants were aged between 62 and 90 years; eight participants had arrived as refugees. Thematic analysis resulted in the following themes within the five levels: individual (pre-migration and migration experiences and impact on health, aging-related health decline, sedentary lifestyle, side effects of medications,language barrier); interpersonal (social support and social participation); organizational (access to healthcare and support services, transportation, - disruption to services due to COVID-19, perception of healthcare and support services); community (social, emotional and practical support, connecting older adults to services) and public policy (financial barriers, immigration policies and legal status). Conclusions Given the distinct linguistic and cultural backgrounds coupled with the unique health needs of our study participants, there is a need for diverse and complementary interventions that seek to build a sense of community and social support for older adults. Such interventions ought to be co-developed with immigrant communities and local organizations to ensure cultural acceptability and effectiveness. Crucially needed are immigration policies that consider the unique situation of older immigrants from low-income backgrounds to ensure equitable access to health and social care services.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"72 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140665584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and evaluation of a stroke research Public Patient Involvement Panel 中风研究公众患者参与小组的发展与评估
Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13838.1
S. O'Reilly, A. Whiston, Eva Corbett, Amy O'Mahony, Molly X Manning, Pauline Boland, Katie Robinson, Rose Galvin, Joanna M Allardyce, Mike Butler, Jim Bradley, Jon Salsberg, Margaret O’Connor, Patricia Pond, Eva Murphy, Liam Glynn, N. Cunningham, Edel Hennessy, S. Hayes
Background Public and patient involvement (PPI) is important in stroke research to ensure that research conducted reflects the priorities and needs of people after stroke. Several factors have been found to affect PPI, including location of the research and time requirements for participation. The incidence of stroke is rising, and can result in symptoms including fatigue, depression, and physical/cognitive impairments. Aims 1) Describe the development of a PPI advisory group and a healthcare professional advisory group for stroke rehabilitation research and 2) to explore the perspectives of the members of the PPI groups on being involved in the research process. Methods A stakeholder panel consisting of up to 20 people with stroke, members of the public and healthcare professionals will be formed. A pragmatic purposive sampling technique using snowball sampling will be used to recruit members. The PPI panel will meet four times and will be supported by the guidelines developed from the INVOLVE framework. The PPI panel will be involved as co-researchers in the conceptualisation of future stroke rehabilitation research, the delivery of such studies, the analysis and dissemination of findings. Following the development of the panel, we will conduct semi-structured focus groups to collect qualitative data, examining the perspectives of members. Separate focus groups will be held for people with stroke, family members/cares, and healthcare professionals/researchers. Data will be transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. This will result in a set of themes and subthemes describing participants' opinions and experience of being on a PPI panel in stroke rehabilitation research. Conclusions PPI is an essential part of research in stroke. Stakeholders can provide key insights into the research processes. The results of this qualitative study will provide insight into the barriers and enablers of their participation in PPI in stroke rehabilitation research.
背景 公众和患者参与(PPI)在卒中研究中非常重要,可确保研究反映卒中患者的优先事项和需求。研究发现有几个因素会影响公众和患者参与,包括研究地点和参与时间要求。中风的发病率不断上升,可导致疲劳、抑郁、身体/认知障碍等症状。目的 1) 描述中风康复研究的公众参与咨询小组和医疗保健专业咨询小组的发展情况;2) 探讨公众参与小组成员对参与研究过程的看法。方法 将成立一个利益相关者小组,由多达 20 名中风患者、公众和医疗专业人员组成。将采用滚雪球抽样的实用目的性抽样技术招募成员。PPI 小组将召开四次会议,并将得到 INVOLVE 框架制定的指导原则的支持。PPI 小组将作为共同研究者参与未来中风康复研究的构思、研究的实施、研究结果的分析和传播。小组成立后,我们将开展半结构化焦点小组活动,收集定性数据,研究小组成员的观点。我们将分别为中风患者、家庭成员/护理人员、医疗保健专业人员/研究人员组织焦点小组。数据将通过布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法进行转录和分析。这将产生一组主题和次主题,描述参与者在中风康复研究中参加公众参与小组的意见和经验。结论 公众参与是脑卒中研究的重要组成部分。利益相关者可以为研究过程提供重要见解。本定性研究的结果将有助于深入了解他们参与卒中康复研究中患者参与小组的障碍和促进因素。
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a stroke research Public Patient Involvement Panel","authors":"S. O'Reilly, A. Whiston, Eva Corbett, Amy O'Mahony, Molly X Manning, Pauline Boland, Katie Robinson, Rose Galvin, Joanna M Allardyce, Mike Butler, Jim Bradley, Jon Salsberg, Margaret O’Connor, Patricia Pond, Eva Murphy, Liam Glynn, N. Cunningham, Edel Hennessy, S. Hayes","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13838.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13838.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Public and patient involvement (PPI) is important in stroke research to ensure that research conducted reflects the priorities and needs of people after stroke. Several factors have been found to affect PPI, including location of the research and time requirements for participation. The incidence of stroke is rising, and can result in symptoms including fatigue, depression, and physical/cognitive impairments. Aims 1) Describe the development of a PPI advisory group and a healthcare professional advisory group for stroke rehabilitation research and 2) to explore the perspectives of the members of the PPI groups on being involved in the research process. Methods A stakeholder panel consisting of up to 20 people with stroke, members of the public and healthcare professionals will be formed. A pragmatic purposive sampling technique using snowball sampling will be used to recruit members. The PPI panel will meet four times and will be supported by the guidelines developed from the INVOLVE framework. The PPI panel will be involved as co-researchers in the conceptualisation of future stroke rehabilitation research, the delivery of such studies, the analysis and dissemination of findings. Following the development of the panel, we will conduct semi-structured focus groups to collect qualitative data, examining the perspectives of members. Separate focus groups will be held for people with stroke, family members/cares, and healthcare professionals/researchers. Data will be transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. This will result in a set of themes and subthemes describing participants' opinions and experience of being on a PPI panel in stroke rehabilitation research. Conclusions PPI is an essential part of research in stroke. Stakeholders can provide key insights into the research processes. The results of this qualitative study will provide insight into the barriers and enablers of their participation in PPI in stroke rehabilitation research.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"78 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140665239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A scoping review of infertility research conducted in the Republic Of Ireland 对爱尔兰共和国开展的不孕不育研究进行范围审查
Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13877.1
Áine Earley, Angela O’Dea, C. Madden, Paul O'Connor, D. Byrne, Andrew W. Murphy, S. Lydon
Background Approximately 25 million citizens in Europe experience infertility. Until September 2023, the Republic of Ireland (RoI) was the only state in the European Union that did not offer any state-funded access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). As research supports the understanding, and improvement, of care delivery, and research activity is associated with healthcare performance, it seems timely to develop an understanding of infertility research to-date in RoI. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the extent and nature of research on infertility conducted in RoI. Methods A protocol for this scoping review was published through the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H8F4Y) in March 2023. The search strategy was comprised of electronic searches, review of reference lists, grey literature searches, and screening of publications from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Studies focused on infertility or infertility care that were conducted in RoI were included. Deductive content analysis was used to cluster studies. Results In total, 105 studies were included and published between 1951 and 2023, with a marked increase from 2010. Studies most frequently considered Success Rates of ART (31.4%), Service Description and Evaluation (12.4%), and Optimising Treatment Regimes or Protocols (11.4%). Conclusions The sizable body of research is congruent with the increasing burden of infertility. However, the literature is limited by a predominant focus on ART success rates, a dearth of qualitative studies, limited engagement with healthcare providers, and limited exploration of the quality of care provision. This review may offer a useful model for researchers in other countries. The variability in availability, and outcomes, of ART across Europe conveys the necessity of understanding and advancing research within individual countries and health systems as well as internationally.
背景 欧洲约有 2500 万公民患有不孕症。在 2023 年 9 月之前,爱尔兰共和国(RoI)是欧盟中唯一一个不提供任何国家资助的辅助生殖技术(ART)的国家。由于研究有助于理解和改进医疗服务,而研究活动又与医疗保健绩效相关联,因此了解爱尔兰共和国迄今为止的不孕不育研究似乎正当其时。本次范围界定审查的目的是检查印度洋地区不孕不育症研究的范围和性质。方法 2023年3月,通过开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H8F4Y)发布了本范围界定综述的协议。检索策略包括电子检索、查阅参考文献目录、灰色文献检索以及筛选欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会和国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会的出版物。其中包括在罗得岛进行的有关不孕症或不孕症护理的研究。采用演绎内容分析法对研究进行分组。结果 共纳入了 105 项研究,这些研究发表于 1951 年至 2023 年间,与 2010 年相比有明显增加。最常见的研究涉及抗逆转录病毒疗法的成功率(31.4%)、服务描述和评估(12.4%)以及优化治疗方案(11.4%)。结论 大量的研究与不孕症日益加重的负担相吻合。然而,文献的局限性在于主要关注抗逆转录病毒疗法的成功率、定性研究的缺乏、与医疗服务提供者的接触有限以及对医疗服务质量的探索有限。本综述可为其他国家的研究人员提供有用的范例。欧洲各国抗逆转录病毒疗法的可用性和结果各不相同,这说明有必要了解并推进各个国家和卫生系统以及国际范围内的研究。
{"title":"A scoping review of infertility research conducted in the Republic Of Ireland","authors":"Áine Earley, Angela O’Dea, C. Madden, Paul O'Connor, D. Byrne, Andrew W. Murphy, S. Lydon","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13877.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13877.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Approximately 25 million citizens in Europe experience infertility. Until September 2023, the Republic of Ireland (RoI) was the only state in the European Union that did not offer any state-funded access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). As research supports the understanding, and improvement, of care delivery, and research activity is associated with healthcare performance, it seems timely to develop an understanding of infertility research to-date in RoI. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the extent and nature of research on infertility conducted in RoI. Methods A protocol for this scoping review was published through the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H8F4Y) in March 2023. The search strategy was comprised of electronic searches, review of reference lists, grey literature searches, and screening of publications from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Studies focused on infertility or infertility care that were conducted in RoI were included. Deductive content analysis was used to cluster studies. Results In total, 105 studies were included and published between 1951 and 2023, with a marked increase from 2010. Studies most frequently considered Success Rates of ART (31.4%), Service Description and Evaluation (12.4%), and Optimising Treatment Regimes or Protocols (11.4%). Conclusions The sizable body of research is congruent with the increasing burden of infertility. However, the literature is limited by a predominant focus on ART success rates, a dearth of qualitative studies, limited engagement with healthcare providers, and limited exploration of the quality of care provision. This review may offer a useful model for researchers in other countries. The variability in availability, and outcomes, of ART across Europe conveys the necessity of understanding and advancing research within individual countries and health systems as well as internationally.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"117 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140659426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of positive childhood experiences on adult psychiatric disorder and symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies 积极的童年经历对成年后精神障碍和症状的影响:纵向队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析协议书
Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13833.1
L. Telford, C. Healy, Éilis J O’Reilly, Mary C Clarke
Background Mental and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability among young people worldwide. Early life environments and experiences have a significant influence on development with long-lasting implications for both physical and mental health. While the harmful effects of childhood adversity are well-documented, positive childhood experiences are less well-established and the degree of association with later mental health outcomes is currently undefined. The proposed systematic review will therefore examine the literature exploring associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and the development of psychiatric disorder or symptoms in adulthood. Methods and analysis Studies examining associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and risk of adult psychiatric disorder or symptoms will be systematically identified by searching Embase, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Customised search strategies will be built for each database by combining key search terms relating to inclusion criteria. No restrictions on publication date will be applied, however searches will be restricted to the English language. Provided data are sufficient, a random-effects model at the 0.05 level of significance will be used to pool quantitative effect estimates. If meta-analysis is not possible, results will be summarised in tables and reported narratively. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies will be used for quality assessment of included studies and the overall strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Heterogeneity between included studies will be explored through visual inspection of forest plots and by assessing the I2 statistic. Reporting of this protocol has been guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Statement. Ethics and dissemination Only published data will be used for this review therefore ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated in a scientific peer-reviewed journal and results presented at conferences.
背景 精神障碍和药物滥用是导致全球青少年残疾的主要原因。早年的生活环境和经历对人的成长有重大影响,并对身心健康产生长远的影响。童年逆境的有害影响已得到充分证实,但积极的童年经历却鲜有人提及,其与日后心理健康结果的关联程度目前也尚未确定。因此,本系统综述将研究探讨童年积极经历与成年后精神障碍或症状发展之间关系的文献。方法与分析 将通过检索 Embase、APA PsycInfo、MEDLINE 和 Scopus,系统地确定研究童年积极经历与成年后精神障碍或症状风险之间关系的研究。我们将结合与纳入标准相关的关键检索词,为每个数据库制定个性化的检索策略。对发表日期不做限制,但搜索仅限于英语。如果数据充足,将使用 0.05 显著性水平的随机效应模型来汇总定量效应估计值。如果无法进行荟萃分析,则将以表格形式总结结果并进行叙述性报告。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的队列研究批判性评估核对表(Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies)将用于对纳入的研究进行质量评估,并将使用 "建议分级评估、发展和评价框架"(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework)对证据体的整体强度进行评估。将通过目测森林图和评估 I2 统计量来探讨纳入研究之间的异质性。本方案的报告遵循《系统综述和元分析方案首选报告项目声明》的标准。伦理与传播 本综述仅使用已发表的数据,因此无需伦理批准。研究结果将在同行评审的科学期刊上发表,并在会议上展示。
{"title":"The impact of positive childhood experiences on adult psychiatric disorder and symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies","authors":"L. Telford, C. Healy, Éilis J O’Reilly, Mary C Clarke","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13833.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13833.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Mental and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability among young people worldwide. Early life environments and experiences have a significant influence on development with long-lasting implications for both physical and mental health. While the harmful effects of childhood adversity are well-documented, positive childhood experiences are less well-established and the degree of association with later mental health outcomes is currently undefined. The proposed systematic review will therefore examine the literature exploring associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and the development of psychiatric disorder or symptoms in adulthood. Methods and analysis Studies examining associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and risk of adult psychiatric disorder or symptoms will be systematically identified by searching Embase, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Customised search strategies will be built for each database by combining key search terms relating to inclusion criteria. No restrictions on publication date will be applied, however searches will be restricted to the English language. Provided data are sufficient, a random-effects model at the 0.05 level of significance will be used to pool quantitative effect estimates. If meta-analysis is not possible, results will be summarised in tables and reported narratively. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies will be used for quality assessment of included studies and the overall strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Heterogeneity between included studies will be explored through visual inspection of forest plots and by assessing the I2 statistic. Reporting of this protocol has been guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Statement. Ethics and dissemination Only published data will be used for this review therefore ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated in a scientific peer-reviewed journal and results presented at conferences.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140688809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the feasibility of a comprehensive patient reported outcome set for postpartum women: the maternal patient-reported outcome set (MOMs Study) 产后妇女综合患者报告结果集可行性评估:产妇患者报告结果集(MOMs 研究)
Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1
L. O'Byrne, G. Maher, Jill M Mitchell, Ali Khashan, Richard Greene, John Browne, Fergus McCarthy
Background Our team published a systematic review highlighting the lack of a comprehensive measure of health and wellbeing for postpartum women. The aim of this project was to examine the feasibility of a combination of existing measures, chosen for their coverage of key domains and psychometric rigour. The primary objective was to examine the validity and completeness of the novel outcome set within the first week (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks postpartum (T3). Secondary objectives were to examine concordance between patient-clinician reports of delivery complications and assess postpartum response rates. Methods Participants completed demographic and delivery details as well as completing a combination of existing PROM tools: the PQoL (Postpartum women’s Quality of life questionnaire), ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and 2 sexual health questions. Participants also rated the validity of these tools. Results The response rates were 69% (n=59)T1, 67% (n=57)T2 and 48% (41)T3. Complete responses at T1 55% (n=47),T2 53% (n=45)T3 44% (n=37). The median time taken to complete the survey was 7 minutes. Across the three time points ~70% (70.2% T1, 73.3% T2, 69% T3) of respondents felt that all outcomes that mattered most to them were captured. The difference between complication rates reported by patients and clinicians was 0% for neonatal and high-dependency unit admissions. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was reported by 2 patients and 1 clinician. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was reported by 4 (28%) despite electronic records recording PPH occurrence in 14 patients at T1. Conclusions A combination of tools and additional sexual health questions collected from postpartum women using an online survey across three postnatal time points appears feasible and has good validity and completeness. Patient-clinician concordance in the reporting of complication rates was high for all but PPH where patients tended to report lower rates.
背景 我们的团队发表了一篇系统性综述,强调了产后妇女的健康和幸福缺乏全面的衡量标准。本项目旨在研究现有测量方法组合的可行性,这些测量方法是根据其关键领域的覆盖范围和心理测量的严谨性而选择的。首要目标是检验产后第一周(T1)、产后 6 周(T2)和产后 12 周(T3)的新结果集的有效性和完整性。次要目标是检查患者和医生对分娩并发症报告的一致性,并评估产后反应率。方法 参与者填写人口统计学和分娩详细信息,并完成现有的 PROM 工具组合:PQoL(产后妇女生活质量问卷)、ICIQ-UI-SF(尿失禁国际咨询问卷-尿失禁简表)和 2 个性健康问题。参与者还对这些工具的有效性进行了评分。结果 T1、T2 和 T3 的回复率分别为 69%(59 人)、67%(57 人)和 48%(41 人)。完整回答率分别为:T1 55% (n=47)、T2 53% (n=45)、T3 44% (n=37)。完成调查所用时间的中位数为 7 分钟。在三个时间点中,约 70% 的受访者(70.2% T1、73.3% T2、69% T3)认为所有对他们来说最重要的结果都被记录了下来。患者和临床医生报告的并发症发生率在新生儿和重症监护室入院患者中的差异为 0%。有 2 名患者和 1 名临床医生报告了产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)。产后出血(PPH)有 4 例(28%),尽管电子记录显示在 T1 有 14 例患者发生了 PPH。结论 在产后三个时间点上,通过在线调查从产后妇女处收集工具和附加性健康问题的组合似乎是可行的,并且具有良好的有效性和完整性。在所有并发症发生率的报告中,除 PPH 外,患者与医生的一致性都很高,因为患者报告的 PPH 发生率往往较低。
{"title":"Assessment of the feasibility of a comprehensive patient reported outcome set for postpartum women: the maternal patient-reported outcome set (MOMs Study)","authors":"L. O'Byrne, G. Maher, Jill M Mitchell, Ali Khashan, Richard Greene, John Browne, Fergus McCarthy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background Our team published a systematic review highlighting the lack of a comprehensive measure of health and wellbeing for postpartum women. The aim of this project was to examine the feasibility of a combination of existing measures, chosen for their coverage of key domains and psychometric rigour. The primary objective was to examine the validity and completeness of the novel outcome set within the first week (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks postpartum (T3). Secondary objectives were to examine concordance between patient-clinician reports of delivery complications and assess postpartum response rates. Methods Participants completed demographic and delivery details as well as completing a combination of existing PROM tools: the PQoL (Postpartum women’s Quality of life questionnaire), ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and 2 sexual health questions. Participants also rated the validity of these tools. Results The response rates were 69% (n=59)T1, 67% (n=57)T2 and 48% (41)T3. Complete responses at T1 55% (n=47),T2 53% (n=45)T3 44% (n=37). The median time taken to complete the survey was 7 minutes. Across the three time points ~70% (70.2% T1, 73.3% T2, 69% T3) of respondents felt that all outcomes that mattered most to them were captured. The difference between complication rates reported by patients and clinicians was 0% for neonatal and high-dependency unit admissions. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was reported by 2 patients and 1 clinician. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was reported by 4 (28%) despite electronic records recording PPH occurrence in 14 patients at T1. Conclusions A combination of tools and additional sexual health questions collected from postpartum women using an online survey across three postnatal time points appears feasible and has good validity and completeness. Patient-clinician concordance in the reporting of complication rates was high for all but PPH where patients tended to report lower rates.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140688664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological factors and diabetic foot ulceration: a scoping review of the bi-directional relationship between diabetic foot ulcer healing and mental health factors 心理因素与糖尿病足溃疡:糖尿病足溃疡愈合与心理健康因素之间双向关系的范围界定综述
Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13755.1
M. Hanlon, Brian McGuire, C. MacGilchrist, Rosie Dunne, Ellen Kirwan, Deirdre Ní Neachtain, K. Dhatariya, V. Blanchette, H. Durand, Anda Dragomir, Caroline McIntosh
Introduction Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Psychological factors are believed to play a role in wound healing, but it remains uncertain if psychological interventions can help individuals with an active DFU, or a history of DFUs, to achieve complete or improved wound healing or prevent recurrence. Objective The objective of the proposed scoping review is to investigate the emotional consequences/burden of living with DFU and to examine how psychosocial factors may impact progression and management of ulcerations. Methods This review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will guide the reporting of results. Discussion While factors such as stress, depression, social support, and adherence to treatment have been identified as variables that may negatively affect DFU healing, there is a need for a greater understanding of how psychological and behavioural variables such as these may influence ulcer incidence, healing and recurrence in people with diabetes. This review will comprise of a broad and systematically mapped synthesis of the identified data. Findings will be used to provide a better understanding of the bi-directional relationship between DFU and psychological variables and will provide direction for the development or adaptation of a tailored psychological intervention that will aim to optimise wellbeing and improve outcomes for individuals with DFU.
导言 糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病的主要并发症,发病率和死亡率都很高。心理因素被认为在伤口愈合中起着一定作用,但心理干预能否帮助活动性糖尿病足溃疡或有糖尿病足溃疡病史的患者实现完全愈合或改善伤口愈合或防止复发,目前仍不确定。目标 本范围界定综述旨在调查 DFU 患者的情感后果/生活负担,并研究心理社会因素如何影响溃疡的进展和管理。方法 本综述将按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定综述方法进行,范围界定综述的系统综述和荟萃分析扩展首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)将指导结果的报告。讨论 虽然压力、抑郁、社会支持和坚持治疗等因素已被确定为可能对 DFU 愈合产生负面影响的变量,但仍有必要进一步了解这些心理和行为变量如何影响糖尿病患者的溃疡发生、愈合和复发。本综述将对已确定的数据进行广泛而系统的综合。研究结果将用于更好地理解 DFU 与心理变量之间的双向关系,并为开发或调整量身定制的心理干预措施提供方向,该干预措施旨在优化 DFU 患者的身心健康并改善其治疗效果。
{"title":"Psychological factors and diabetic foot ulceration: a scoping review of the bi-directional relationship between diabetic foot ulcer healing and mental health factors","authors":"M. Hanlon, Brian McGuire, C. MacGilchrist, Rosie Dunne, Ellen Kirwan, Deirdre Ní Neachtain, K. Dhatariya, V. Blanchette, H. Durand, Anda Dragomir, Caroline McIntosh","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13755.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13755.1","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Psychological factors are believed to play a role in wound healing, but it remains uncertain if psychological interventions can help individuals with an active DFU, or a history of DFUs, to achieve complete or improved wound healing or prevent recurrence. Objective The objective of the proposed scoping review is to investigate the emotional consequences/burden of living with DFU and to examine how psychosocial factors may impact progression and management of ulcerations. Methods This review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will guide the reporting of results. Discussion While factors such as stress, depression, social support, and adherence to treatment have been identified as variables that may negatively affect DFU healing, there is a need for a greater understanding of how psychological and behavioural variables such as these may influence ulcer incidence, healing and recurrence in people with diabetes. This review will comprise of a broad and systematically mapped synthesis of the identified data. Findings will be used to provide a better understanding of the bi-directional relationship between DFU and psychological variables and will provide direction for the development or adaptation of a tailored psychological intervention that will aim to optimise wellbeing and improve outcomes for individuals with DFU.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140689218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The economic impact of living with a rare disease for children and their families: a scoping review protocol. 罕见疾病对儿童及其家庭的经济影响:范围界定审查协议。
Pub Date : 2024-04-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13765.2
Niamh Buckle, Orla Doyle, Naonori Kodate, Suja Somanadhan

Background: Rare diseases are an often chronic, progressive and life-limiting group of conditions affecting more than 30 million people in Europe. These diseases are associated with significant direct and indirect costs to a spectrum of stakeholders, ranging from individuals and their families to society overall. Further quantitative research on the economic cost for children and their families living with a rare disease is required as there is little known on this topic. This scoping review aims to document the extent and type of evidence on the economic impacts of living with a rare disease for children and their families.

Methods: This scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and follow the six-stage methodology for scoping reviews: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating, summarising and reporting results and (6) knowledge user consultation. Key inclusion criteria have been developed according to the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. The databases EconLit, ABI/Inform, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched for possible articles for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of potential articles using a dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included. All included articles will be assessed using a validated quality appraisal tool. A panel of patient and public involvement representatives experiencing rare diseases and knowledge users will validate the review results.

Conclusions: This scoping review will map the current literature on the economic impact of paediatric rare diseases to understand how these impacts affect children living with rare diseases and their families. This evidence has the potential to influence policy and future research in this area and will support further research on the economic impact of rare diseases on families.

背景:罕见病通常是一类慢性、进展性和限制生命的疾病,影响着欧洲 3000 多万人。这些疾病给从个人及其家庭到整个社会的利益相关者带来了巨大的直接和间接成本。由于对罕见病儿童及其家庭的经济成本知之甚少,因此需要进一步开展定量研究。本范围界定审查旨在记录有关罕见病对儿童及其家庭的经济影响的证据范围和类型:本范围界定综述将遵循 PRISMA-ScR 和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所指南,并遵循范围界定综述的六阶段方法:(1) 确定研究问题;(2) 确定相关研究;(3) 选择研究;(4) 绘制数据图表;(5) 整理、总结和报告结果;(6) 知识用户咨询。主要纳入标准是根据人口-概念-背景 (PCC) 框架制定的。将在 EconLit、ABI/Inform、MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Scopus 等数据库中搜索可能纳入的文章。两名独立审稿人将采用双重审稿程序筛选潜在文章的标题和摘要,以确保纳入所有相关研究。所有纳入的文章都将使用有效的质量评估工具进行评估。一个由经历过罕见病的患者和公众参与代表以及知识使用者组成的小组将对评审结果进行验证:本次范围界定审查将对有关儿科罕见病经济影响的现有文献进行梳理,以了解这些影响如何影响罕见病患儿及其家庭。这些证据有可能影响该领域的政策和未来研究,并将支持有关罕见病对家庭经济影响的进一步研究。
{"title":"The economic impact of living with a rare disease for children and their families: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Niamh Buckle, Orla Doyle, Naonori Kodate, Suja Somanadhan","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13765.2","DOIUrl":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13765.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rare diseases are an often chronic, progressive and life-limiting group of conditions affecting more than 30 million people in Europe. These diseases are associated with significant direct and indirect costs to a spectrum of stakeholders, ranging from individuals and their families to society overall. Further quantitative research on the economic cost for children and their families living with a rare disease is required as there is little known on this topic. This scoping review aims to document the extent and type of evidence on the economic impacts of living with a rare disease for children and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and follow the six-stage methodology for scoping reviews: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating, summarising and reporting results and (6) knowledge user consultation. Key inclusion criteria have been developed according to the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. The databases EconLit, ABI/Inform, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus will be searched for possible articles for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts of potential articles using a dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included. All included articles will be assessed using a validated quality appraisal tool. A panel of patient and public involvement representatives experiencing rare diseases and knowledge users will validate the review results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review will map the current literature on the economic impact of paediatric rare diseases to understand how these impacts affect children living with rare diseases and their families. This evidence has the potential to influence policy and future research in this area and will support further research on the economic impact of rare diseases on families.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"6 ","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participation in physical activity by adolescents with physical disability: Protocol for a national participation snapshot and Delphi consensus study (“Youth Experience Matters”) 肢体残疾青少年参加体育活动的情况:全国参与情况快照和德尔菲共识研究议定书("青少年经验至关重要)
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13741.2
K. Brady, D. Kiernan, Elaine McConkey, Eva O'Gorman, Claire Kerr, Suzanne M. McDonough, Jennifer Ryan, A. Malone
Young people with physical disability experience challenges to being physically active. To attain the health benefits of physical activity (PA) and sustain engagement, it is essential that participation is meaningful and enjoyable. This study aims to describe current participation in PA by adolescents with physical disability in Ireland, and to establish consensus on their priorities for enhancing physical activity participation. A parallel convergent mixed methods study will be undertaken, comprising a national cross-sectional quantitative assessment of PA participation (“Participation Snapshot”) and Delphi consensus study (“Delphi”). Adolescents (n=100) aged 13–17 years with a physical disability will be invited to take part. The Participation Snapshot primary outcome is the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Contextual factors including underlying medical diagnosis, demographics, mobility (Functional Mobility Scale), hand function (Manual Ability Classification System) and health related quality of life (Child Health Utility 9D) will also be collected. The Delphi will comprise two to four survey rounds, until consensus is reached. Round 1 consists of a bespoke survey, designed and piloted with a public and patient involvement (PPI) panel, with open-ended questions and Likert scales inviting contributions from adolescents on their prior experience and ideas to enhance participation. Responses will be analysed using inductive thematic analysis to construct items and themes, which will then be deductively mapped to the “F-words” and the family of Participation-Related Constructs frameworks. These items will be presented back to participants in subsequent rounds for selection and ranking, until consensus is achieved on the “top 10 priorities” for enhancing PA participation. The project team and PPI panel will then co-design dissemination material and identify targets for dissemination to relevant stakeholder or policy groups. The findings will provide a basis for developing interventions aiming to enhance future PA participation for adolescents with physical disability.
肢体残疾青少年在参加体育锻炼时会遇到各种挑战。要想从体育锻炼(PA)中获得健康益处并保持参与度,有意义且愉快的参与至关重要。本研究旨在描述爱尔兰肢体残疾青少年目前参与体育锻炼的情况,并就加强体育锻炼的优先事项达成共识。本研究将采用并行的趋同混合方法,包括对参与体育锻炼情况的全国横断面定量评估("参与情况快照")和德尔菲共识研究("德尔菲")。研究将邀请 13-17 岁的肢体残疾青少年(100 人)参加。参与快照 "的主要结果是 "儿童参与和乐趣评估"(CAPE)。此外,还将收集相关因素,包括基本医疗诊断、人口统计学、活动能力(功能性活动能力量表)、手部功能(手动能力分类系统)和与健康相关的生活质量(儿童健康效用 9D)。德尔菲法将包括两到四轮调查,直至达成共识。第一轮调查包括一份定制调查,由公众和患者参与(PPI)小组设计和试行,采用开放式问题和李克特量表,邀请青少年就其先前的经验和加强参与的想法提供意见。我们将采用归纳式主题分析法对答复进行分析,以构建项目和主题,然后将这些项目和主题与 "F-words "和参与相关结构框架系列进行演绎映射。这些项目将在随后的几轮中再提交给参与者进行选择和排序,直至就加强巴勒斯坦权力机构参与的 "十大优先事项 "达成共识。然后,项目团队和公众参与小组将共同设计传播材料,并确定向相关利益相关者或政策团体传播的目标。研究结果将为制定干预措施提供依据,旨在提高肢体残疾青少年未来的体育锻炼参与度。
{"title":"Participation in physical activity by adolescents with physical disability: Protocol for a national participation snapshot and Delphi consensus study (“Youth Experience Matters”)","authors":"K. Brady, D. Kiernan, Elaine McConkey, Eva O'Gorman, Claire Kerr, Suzanne M. McDonough, Jennifer Ryan, A. Malone","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13741.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13741.2","url":null,"abstract":"Young people with physical disability experience challenges to being physically active. To attain the health benefits of physical activity (PA) and sustain engagement, it is essential that participation is meaningful and enjoyable. This study aims to describe current participation in PA by adolescents with physical disability in Ireland, and to establish consensus on their priorities for enhancing physical activity participation. A parallel convergent mixed methods study will be undertaken, comprising a national cross-sectional quantitative assessment of PA participation (“Participation Snapshot”) and Delphi consensus study (“Delphi”). Adolescents (n=100) aged 13–17 years with a physical disability will be invited to take part. The Participation Snapshot primary outcome is the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Contextual factors including underlying medical diagnosis, demographics, mobility (Functional Mobility Scale), hand function (Manual Ability Classification System) and health related quality of life (Child Health Utility 9D) will also be collected. The Delphi will comprise two to four survey rounds, until consensus is reached. Round 1 consists of a bespoke survey, designed and piloted with a public and patient involvement (PPI) panel, with open-ended questions and Likert scales inviting contributions from adolescents on their prior experience and ideas to enhance participation. Responses will be analysed using inductive thematic analysis to construct items and themes, which will then be deductively mapped to the “F-words” and the family of Participation-Related Constructs frameworks. These items will be presented back to participants in subsequent rounds for selection and ranking, until consensus is achieved on the “top 10 priorities” for enhancing PA participation. The project team and PPI panel will then co-design dissemination material and identify targets for dissemination to relevant stakeholder or policy groups. The findings will provide a basis for developing interventions aiming to enhance future PA participation for adolescents with physical disability.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review protocol. 医护人员对糖尿病预防计划转诊和招募的障碍和促进因素的看法:系统性审查方案。
Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2
Clair Haseldine, Gráinne O'Donoghue, Patricia M Kearney, Fiona Riordan, Sarah Cotterill, Sheena McHugh

Background: Diabetes is a growing global health problem. International guidelines recommend identification, screening, and referral to behavioural programmes for those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) can prevent type 2 diabetes in those at high risk, however many eligible participants are not referred to these programmes. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are pivotal to the referral and recruitment processes. This study aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to DPPs from the perspective of HCWs.

Methods: A "best fit" framework synthesis method will synthesise qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods evidence on factors that affect HCWs referral and recruitment to DPPs, with the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the a priori framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched for primary studies published in English. Year of publication will be restricted to the last 26 years (1997-2023). Quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mix of deductive coding using the TDF and inductive coding of data that does not fit the TDF will be synthesised into themes representing the whole dataset. The relationships between the final set of themes will be explored to create a new model to understand HCWs' perspectives on referral and recruitment to DPPs. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out on this conceptual model. Confidence in the synthesised findings will be assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. One author will screen, extract, appraise the literature while a second author will independently verify a 20% sample at each stage.

Discussion: Participation in DPPs is key for programme impact. HCWs typically identify those at risk and refer them to DPPs. Understanding HCWs' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment will inform future implementation of DPPs.

背景:糖尿病是一个日益严重的全球性健康问题。国际指南建议对 2 型糖尿病高危人群进行识别、筛查并转介至行为方案。糖尿病预防计划(DPPs)可预防高危人群患上 2 型糖尿病,但许多符合条件的参与者并未被转介到这些计划中。医护人员(HCW)在转介和招募过程中起着关键作用。本研究旨在从医护人员的角度出发,识别、评估和综合有关转诊和招募糖尿病预防计划的障碍和促进因素的证据:方法:采用 "最合适 "框架综合法,以理论领域框架(TDF)为先验框架,综合定性、定量和混合方法的证据,探讨影响高危工作者转介和招募参加 DPPs 的因素。将在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Web of Science 和 Scopus 中检索以英文发表的主要研究。发表年份仅限于过去 26 年(1997-2023 年)。将使用 "混合方法评估工具 "对研究质量进行评估。将使用 TDF 进行演绎编码,并对不符合 TDF 的数据进行归纳编码,综合成代表整个数据集的主题。我们将探讨最终主题之间的关系,以创建一个新的模型来了解保健工作者对转介和招募到 DPP 的看法。将对这一概念模型进行敏感性分析。将采用 GRADE-CERQual 方法评估综合研究结果的可信度。一位作者将对文献进行筛选、提取和评估,而第二位作者将在每个阶段独立核实 20% 的样本:参与 DPP 是计划产生影响的关键。医护人员通常会识别高危人群,并将他们转介到 DPP。了解保健工作者对转介和招募的障碍和促进因素的看法,将为今后实施 DPPs 提供参考。
{"title":"Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Clair Haseldine, Gráinne O'Donoghue, Patricia M Kearney, Fiona Riordan, Sarah Cotterill, Sheena McHugh","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a growing global health problem. International guidelines recommend identification, screening, and referral to behavioural programmes for those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) can prevent type 2 diabetes in those at high risk, however many eligible participants are not referred to these programmes. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are pivotal to the referral and recruitment processes. This study aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to DPPs from the perspective of HCWs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A \"best fit\" framework synthesis method will synthesise qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods evidence on factors that affect HCWs referral and recruitment to DPPs, with the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the <i>a priori</i> framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched for primary studies published in English. Year of publication will be restricted to the last 26 years (1997-2023). Quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mix of deductive coding using the TDF and inductive coding of data that does not fit the TDF will be synthesised into themes representing the whole dataset. The relationships between the final set of themes will be explored to create a new model to understand HCWs' perspectives on referral and recruitment to DPPs. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out on this conceptual model. Confidence in the synthesised findings will be assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. One author will screen, extract, appraise the literature while a second author will independently verify a 20% sample at each stage.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participation in DPPs is key for programme impact. HCWs typically identify those at risk and refer them to DPPs. Understanding HCWs' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment will inform future implementation of DPPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"6 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11004599/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry and adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. 产前胎儿脉搏血氧饱和度与围产期不良结局及长期结局的关系:系统综述和荟萃分析方案。
Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13802.2
Jill M Mitchell, Siobhan Walsh, Laura J O'Byrne, Virginia Conrick, Ray Burke, Ali S Khashan, John Higgins, Richard Greene, Gillian M Maher, Fergus P McCarthy

Background: Current methods of intrapartum fetal monitoring based on heart rate, increase the rates of operative delivery but do not prevent or accurately detect fetal hypoxic brain injury. There is a need for more accurate methods of intrapartum fetal surveillance that will decrease the incidence of adverse perinatal and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes while maintaining the lowest possible rate of obstetric intervention. Fetal pulse oximetry (FPO) is a technology that may contribute to improved intrapartum fetal wellbeing evaluation by providing a non-invasive measurement of fetal oxygenation status.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise the evidence examining the association between intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation levels and adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes in the offspring.

Methods: We will include randomised control trials (RCTs), cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies which examine the use of FPO during labour as a means of measuring intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation and assess its effectiveness at detecting adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes compared to existing intrapartum surveillance methods. A detailed systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.Gov and WHO ICTRP will be conducted following a detailed search strategy until February 2024. Three authors will independently review titles, abstracts and full text of articles. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a pre-defined data extraction form and assess the quality of included studies using the Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. We will use random-effects meta-analysis for each exposure-outcome association to calculate pooled estimates using the generic variance method. This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses and MOOSE guidelines.

Prospero registration: CRD42023457368 (04/09/2023).

背景:目前基于心率的产前胎儿监护方法可提高手术分娩率,但不能预防或准确检测胎儿缺氧性脑损伤。我们需要更准确的产前胎儿监护方法,以降低围产期和长期神经发育不良后果的发生率,同时保持尽可能低的产科干预率。胎儿脉搏血氧仪(FPO)是一种通过无创测量胎儿氧合状态来改善产前胎儿健康评估的技术:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合研究产前胎儿血氧饱和度水平与围产期不良结局及后代长期结局之间关系的证据:我们将纳入随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究,这些研究均探讨了在分娩过程中使用 FPO 作为测量产中胎儿血氧饱和度的方法,并评估了与现有产中监测方法相比,FPO 在检测围产期和长期不良结局方面的有效性。在 2024 年 2 月之前,将按照详细的检索策略对 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.Gov 和 WHO ICTRP 进行详细的系统检索。三位作者将独立审阅文章的标题、摘要和全文。两名审稿人将使用预先定义的数据提取表独立提取数据,并使用偏倚风险工具(RCT)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)评估纳入研究的质量。我们将采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)来评估证据的确定性。我们将对每种暴露-结果关联采用随机效应荟萃分析法,使用一般方差法计算集合估计值。本系统综述将遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses)和 MOOSE 指南:CRD42023457368 (04/09/2023).
{"title":"Association between intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry and adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.","authors":"Jill M Mitchell, Siobhan Walsh, Laura J O'Byrne, Virginia Conrick, Ray Burke, Ali S Khashan, John Higgins, Richard Greene, Gillian M Maher, Fergus P McCarthy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13802.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13802.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current methods of intrapartum fetal monitoring based on heart rate, increase the rates of operative delivery but do not prevent or accurately detect fetal hypoxic brain injury. There is a need for more accurate methods of intrapartum fetal surveillance that will decrease the incidence of adverse perinatal and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes while maintaining the lowest possible rate of obstetric intervention. Fetal pulse oximetry (FPO) is a technology that may contribute to improved intrapartum fetal wellbeing evaluation by providing a non-invasive measurement of fetal oxygenation status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise the evidence examining the association between intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation levels and adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes in the offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will include randomised control trials (RCTs), cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies which examine the use of FPO during labour as a means of measuring intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation and assess its effectiveness at detecting adverse perinatal and long-term outcomes compared to existing intrapartum surveillance methods. A detailed systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.Gov and WHO ICTRP will be conducted following a detailed search strategy until February 2024. Three authors will independently review titles, abstracts and full text of articles. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a pre-defined data extraction form and assess the quality of included studies using the Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. We will use random-effects meta-analysis for each exposure-outcome association to calculate pooled estimates using the generic variance method. This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses and MOOSE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42023457368 (04/09/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"6 ","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11019289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140862079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
HRB open research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1