首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of community pharmacy-measured blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: A pilot study 社区药房测量血压与门诊血压监测的比较:试点研究
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.2004
Christine Tran BA, Ibrahim S. Alhomoud Pharm.D., Kristi Taylor B.S., Tana Kaefer Pharm.D., Roy Sabo Ph.D., Dave L. Dixon Pharm.D., FCCP

Introduction

Blood pressure (BP) measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a better predictor of hypertension (HTN)-related end-organ damage than office BP; however, it is not always available nor tolerated by patients. Community pharmacy-measured blood pressure (CPBP) could serve as a potential alternative, although it is unknown whether CPBP is equivalent to BP measured using ABPM.

Objectives

The primary objective of this pilot study was to explore the equivalency of CPBP compared with awake ABPM.

Methods

This was a pilot, single-arm, equivalency study of adults ≥21 years with HTN, taking ≥1 antihypertensive with no changes in the prior 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria included night shift workers, sleep apnoea, arrhythmia, on dialysis, pregnancy or an arm circumference > 50 cm. Three unattended seated BP measurements were obtained in both arms at a community pharmacy and followed by 24-h ABPM. At the return visit, seated BP measurements were repeated; the mean across both visits served as the CPBP. The primary outcome was the equivalency of systolic BP measured at the community pharmacy to awake BP measured using ABPM. The continuous outcome (BP) was modelled against a binary fixed effect for the measurement device (CPBP vs. ABPM) and a subject-level random effect to account for the multiple BP readings arising from the same individuals.

Results

The 25 participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 65 (15) years, 80% were female, and 36% identified as Black or Latino. The mean (SD) systolic BP was 128.0 (20.2) and 129.1 (15.8) mmHg for CPBP and awake ABPM, respectively (p = 0.8409). No significant differences were found between the mean diastolic BP or heart rate for CPBP vs. 24-h ABPM or CPBP vs. daytime ABPM.

Conclusion

The difference between CPBP and ABPM was not statistically significant; however, we cannot claim equivalence between the two approaches.

导言:与诊室血压相比,通过 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)测量的血压能更好地预测与高血压(HTN)相关的终末器官损害;但是,患者并不总能获得或耐受动态血压监测。社区药物测量血压 (CPBP) 可作为一种潜在的替代方法,但 CPBP 是否等同于 ABPM 测量的血压尚不得而知。 目标 本试验研究的主要目的是探讨 CPBP 与清醒 ABPM 相比是否具有同等效果。 方法 这是一项单臂等效性试验研究,研究对象为年龄≥21 岁、服用≥1 种降压药且在前 2 周内未更换过降压药的成人高血压患者。排除标准包括夜班工作者、睡眠呼吸暂停、心律失常、透析患者、怀孕或臂围超过 50 厘米。在社区药房进行三次无人值守的双臂坐位血压测量,然后进行 24 小时 ABPM。回访时,再次进行坐位血压测量;两次测量的平均值作为 CPBP。主要结果是社区药房测量的收缩压与使用 ABPM 测量的清醒血压的等效性。连续结果(血压)与测量设备(CPBP 与 ABPM)的二元固定效应和受试者水平随机效应建立了模型,以考虑来自同一人的多个血压读数。 结果 25 名参与者的平均(标准差 [SD])年龄为 65(15)岁,80% 为女性,36% 为黑人或拉丁裔。CPBP 和清醒 ABPM 的收缩压平均值(标准差)分别为 128.0 (20.2) mmHg 和 129.1 (15.8) mmHg (p = 0.8409)。CPBP 与 24 小时 ABPM 或 CPBP 与日间 ABPM 的平均舒张压或心率之间没有发现明显差异。 结论 CPBP 和 ABPM 之间的差异无统计学意义;但是,我们不能断言这两种方法之间具有等效性。
{"title":"Comparison of community pharmacy-measured blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: A pilot study","authors":"Christine Tran BA,&nbsp;Ibrahim S. Alhomoud Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kristi Taylor B.S.,&nbsp;Tana Kaefer Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Roy Sabo Ph.D.,&nbsp;Dave L. Dixon Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.2004","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Blood pressure (BP) measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a better predictor of hypertension (HTN)-related end-organ damage than office BP; however, it is not always available nor tolerated by patients. Community pharmacy-measured blood pressure (CPBP) could serve as a potential alternative, although it is unknown whether CPBP is equivalent to BP measured using ABPM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The primary objective of this pilot study was to explore the equivalency of CPBP compared with awake ABPM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was a pilot, single-arm, equivalency study of adults ≥21 years with HTN, taking ≥1 antihypertensive with no changes in the prior 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria included night shift workers, sleep apnoea, arrhythmia, on dialysis, pregnancy or an arm circumference &gt; 50 cm. Three unattended seated BP measurements were obtained in both arms at a community pharmacy and followed by 24-h ABPM. At the return visit, seated BP measurements were repeated; the mean across both visits served as the CPBP. The primary outcome was the equivalency of systolic BP measured at the community pharmacy to awake BP measured using ABPM. The continuous outcome (BP) was modelled against a binary fixed effect for the measurement device (CPBP vs. ABPM) and a subject-level random effect to account for the multiple BP readings arising from the same individuals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The 25 participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 65 (15) years, 80% were female, and 36% identified as Black or Latino. The mean (SD) systolic BP was 128.0 (20.2) and 129.1 (15.8) mmHg for CPBP and awake ABPM, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.8409). No significant differences were found between the mean diastolic BP or heart rate for CPBP vs. 24-h ABPM or CPBP vs. daytime ABPM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The difference between CPBP and ABPM was not statistically significant; however, we cannot claim equivalence between the two approaches.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 9","pages":"875-880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.2004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142170285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-sectional evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to identify medication-related problems at discharge from the acute care setting 对临床决策支持工具进行横断面评估,以确定急诊出院时与用药相关的问题
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1998
Savanna DiCristina Pharm.D., MPH, Jacques Turgeon Ph.D., Veronique Michaud Ph.D., Luigi Brunetti Pharm.D., Ph.D.

Background

There are many reported pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) programs to address medication-related problems (MRP) at discharge from the acute care setting. Most have identified time and labor resources as significant limitations. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a medication risk score (MRS)-driven clinical decision support system (CDSS) in identifying actionable MRPs and improving medication safety in the acute care discharge TOC setting.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in a cohort of 481 subjects discharged from the acute care setting. The MRS-CDSS was utilized to identify MRPs and provide recommendations for risk reduction. The distribution of MRPs, recommendations, and their associations with MRS severity were analyzed. Additionally, the potential reduction in MRS per subject and its correlation with MRS severity were examined.

Results

The median MRS reduction per subject was 2 points, while high/severe-risk patients showed a median potential reduction of 7 points. Among the identified MRPs (n = 691), drug interaction, drug use without indication, and adverse drug reaction accounted for 89.7% of all MRPs. The top three recommendations, discontinue medication, change the time of administration, and start alternative therapy, represented 94.1% of all recommendations. Stratified analysis by MRS category revealed a significant increase in adverse drug reaction MRPs and recommendations to discontinue medications with higher MRS severity. The results were consistent with previous outpatient studies, supporting the MRS-CDSS's ability to enhance medication safety.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the MRS-CDSS effectively identifies actionable MRPs and has the potential to substantially reduce overall pharmacotherapy regimen risk when applied during acute care discharge TOC. The findings support implementable recommendations directed at patient safety and the allocation of health care resources to high-risk patients for maximum benefit.

背景 据报道,有许多以药剂师为主导的护理过渡(TOC)计划,旨在解决急症护理出院时的用药相关问题(MRP)。大多数计划都将时间和人力作为主要限制因素。本研究旨在评估由用药风险评分(MRS)驱动的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)在识别可操作的 MRP 和改善急症护理出院 TOC 环境中用药安全方面的有效性。 方法 对 481 名急诊出院者进行了横断面分析。MRS-CDSS 用于识别 MRPs 并提供降低风险的建议。分析了 MRP 的分布、建议及其与 MRS 严重程度的关系。此外,还研究了每个受试者可能减少的 MRS 量及其与 MRS 严重程度的相关性。 结果 每个受试者的 MRS 降低幅度中位数为 2 分,而高风险/严重风险患者的潜在降低幅度中位数为 7 分。在已确定的 MRP(n = 691)中,药物相互作用、无适应症用药和药物不良反应占所有 MRP 的 89.7%。停药、改变给药时间和开始替代疗法这三项建议占所有建议的 94.1%。按 MRS 类别进行的分层分析显示,药物不良反应 MRP 和停药建议在 MRS 严重程度较高时显著增加。结果与之前的门诊研究一致,证明 MRS-CDSS 有能力提高用药安全。 结论 本研究表明,MRS-CDSS 可有效识别可操作的 MRP,并有可能在急诊出院 TOC 中应用,从而大幅降低整体药物治疗方案的风险。研究结果支持针对患者安全和将医疗资源分配给高风险患者以实现最大利益的可实施建议。
{"title":"Cross-sectional evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to identify medication-related problems at discharge from the acute care setting","authors":"Savanna DiCristina Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Jacques Turgeon Ph.D.,&nbsp;Veronique Michaud Ph.D.,&nbsp;Luigi Brunetti Pharm.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1998","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There are many reported pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) programs to address medication-related problems (MRP) at discharge from the acute care setting. Most have identified time and labor resources as significant limitations. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a medication risk score (MRS)-driven clinical decision support system (CDSS) in identifying actionable MRPs and improving medication safety in the acute care discharge TOC setting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in a cohort of 481 subjects discharged from the acute care setting. The MRS-CDSS was utilized to identify MRPs and provide recommendations for risk reduction. The distribution of MRPs, recommendations, and their associations with MRS severity were analyzed. Additionally, the potential reduction in MRS per subject and its correlation with MRS severity were examined.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The median MRS reduction per subject was 2 points, while high/severe-risk patients showed a median potential reduction of 7 points. Among the identified MRPs (<i>n</i> = 691), drug interaction, drug use without indication, and adverse drug reaction accounted for 89.7% of all MRPs. The top three recommendations, discontinue medication, change the time of administration, and start alternative therapy, represented 94.1% of all recommendations. Stratified analysis by MRS category revealed a significant increase in adverse drug reaction MRPs and recommendations to discontinue medications with higher MRS severity. The results were consistent with previous outpatient studies, supporting the MRS-CDSS's ability to enhance medication safety.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study demonstrates that the MRS-CDSS effectively identifies actionable MRPs and has the potential to substantially reduce overall pharmacotherapy regimen risk when applied during acute care discharge TOC. The findings support implementable recommendations directed at patient safety and the allocation of health care resources to high-risk patients for maximum benefit.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"763-771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1998","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141968193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating pharmacogenomic results in the electronic health record to facilitate precision medicine at a large multisite health system 将药物基因组学结果纳入电子病历,促进大型多地点医疗系统的精准医疗
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1996
Sarah A. Morris Pharm.D., D. Grace Nguyen Pharm.D., Victoria Morris M.Sc., Kaitlyn Mroz B.S., Simeon O. Kwange M.S., Jai N. Patel Pharm.D.

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) results can potentially guide the prescribing of dozens of medications; however, use of such results is often limited by the prescriber's awareness of results and knowledge of drug–gene interactions. Integration of PGx results with corresponding clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR) is critical to facilitate genotype-guided medication prescribing among all clinicians in an integrated health system. We describe our experience with developing an infrastructure to house PGx results and ensure actionable findings can be used at the point of care in real time using CDS. Upon transitioning to a new EHR, PGx-related CDS alerts for more than 50 medications were developed using a systematic and multidisciplinary process where clinical pharmacist input was key. Multiple strategies were required to enable the storage of PGx results as discrete data from any laboratory source to drive CDS. EHR features were leveraged to link results from external laboratories to CDS and a homegrown translational software platform was developed to integrate results from the in-house genomics laboratory directly into the EHR. These processes enabled PGx result integration for 2342 patients. As an example, among 356 patients who were genotyped for CYP2C19 to guide voriconazole dosing as part of a standard protocol in bone marrow transplant, 114 (32%) had CDS alerts for medications other than voriconazole presented to a clinician. For 50 of these patients, alerts were presented to a clinician of a different specialty who likely was not aware the patient had PGx results. Clinical pharmacists at institutions performing PGx testing are encouraged to champion the integration of PGx results and CDS in the EHR to maximize clinician awareness and evidence-based use of PGx results.

药物基因组学(PGx)结果可为数十种药物的处方提供潜在指导;然而,这些结果的使用往往受限于处方者对结果的认识和对药物基因相互作用的了解。将 PGx 结果与电子病历(EHR)中相应的临床决策支持(CDS)整合在一起,对于促进综合医疗系统中所有临床医生在基因型指导下开药至关重要。我们介绍了在开发基础设施以存储 PGx 结果并确保可操作的结果可在护理点使用 CDS 实时使用方面的经验。在过渡到新的电子病历(EHR)后,我们采用系统化的多学科流程为 50 多种药物开发了与 PGx 相关的 CDS 警报,其中临床药剂师的投入是关键。需要采取多种策略,才能将 PGx 结果存储为来自任何实验室来源的离散数据,以驱动 CDS。利用电子病历的功能将外部实验室的结果链接到 CDS,并开发了一个自制的转化软件平台,将内部基因组学实验室的结果直接整合到电子病历中。这些流程实现了 2342 名患者的 PGx 结果整合。例如,作为骨髓移植标准方案的一部分,对 356 名患者进行了 CYP2C19 基因分型以指导伏立康唑用药,其中 114 人(32%)向临床医生发出了伏立康唑以外药物的 CDS 警报。其中有 50 名患者的警报是向不同专业的临床医生发出的,而该医生可能并不知道患者有 PGx 结果。我们鼓励进行 PGx 检验的机构的临床药剂师倡导将 PGx 检验结果和 CDS 整合到电子病历中,以最大限度地提高临床医生对 PGx 检验结果的认识和循证使用。
{"title":"Integrating pharmacogenomic results in the electronic health record to facilitate precision medicine at a large multisite health system","authors":"Sarah A. Morris Pharm.D.,&nbsp;D. Grace Nguyen Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Victoria Morris M.Sc.,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Mroz B.S.,&nbsp;Simeon O. Kwange M.S.,&nbsp;Jai N. Patel Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1996","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacogenomics (PGx) results can potentially guide the prescribing of dozens of medications; however, use of such results is often limited by the prescriber's awareness of results and knowledge of drug–gene interactions. Integration of PGx results with corresponding clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR) is critical to facilitate genotype-guided medication prescribing among all clinicians in an integrated health system. We describe our experience with developing an infrastructure to house PGx results and ensure actionable findings can be used at the point of care in real time using CDS. Upon transitioning to a new EHR, PGx-related CDS alerts for more than 50 medications were developed using a systematic and multidisciplinary process where clinical pharmacist input was key. Multiple strategies were required to enable the storage of PGx results as discrete data from any laboratory source to drive CDS. EHR features were leveraged to link results from external laboratories to CDS and a homegrown translational software platform was developed to integrate results from the in-house genomics laboratory directly into the EHR. These processes enabled PGx result integration for 2342 patients. As an example, among 356 patients who were genotyped for <i>CYP2C19</i> to guide voriconazole dosing as part of a standard protocol in bone marrow transplant, 114 (32%) had CDS alerts for medications other than voriconazole presented to a clinician. For 50 of these patients, alerts were presented to a clinician of a different specialty who likely was not aware the patient had PGx results. Clinical pharmacists at institutions performing PGx testing are encouraged to champion the integration of PGx results and CDS in the EHR to maximize clinician awareness and evidence-based use of PGx results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"845-857"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1996","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141967404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research and scholarly methods: Appraising the available literature to inform a research project 研究和学术方法:评估现有文献,为研究项目提供信息
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1987
Blair J. MacDonald Pharm.D., Erica H. Z. Wang Pharm.D., Ricky D. Turgeon Pharm.D.

A literature review with an evaluation of existing evidence is often the first step in designing a research project. This article provides a systematic framework and guide for clinicians, researchers, and clinician-scientists to appraise the available literature to inform a clinical research project. The three-step approach outlined in this article starts with defining your research question using the Population Intervention Comparator Outcome-Design framework, followed by evaluation of the existing evidence and identification of gaps that could be addressed by a research project, and ends with guidance to refine the research question and start preparing a protocol.

对现有证据进行评估的文献综述通常是设计研究项目的第一步。本文为临床医生、研究人员和临床科学家提供了一个系统的框架和指南,帮助他们评估现有文献,为临床研究项目提供依据。本文概述的三步法首先是使用人群干预比较结果设计框架确定研究问题,然后评估现有证据并确定研究项目可以弥补的差距,最后指导如何完善研究问题并开始准备方案。
{"title":"Research and scholarly methods: Appraising the available literature to inform a research project","authors":"Blair J. MacDonald Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Erica H. Z. Wang Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ricky D. Turgeon Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1987","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A literature review with an evaluation of existing evidence is often the first step in designing a research project. This article provides a systematic framework and guide for clinicians, researchers, and clinician-scientists to appraise the available literature to inform a clinical research project. The three-step approach outlined in this article starts with defining your research question using the Population Intervention Comparator Outcome-Design framework, followed by evaluation of the existing evidence and identification of gaps that could be addressed by a research project, and ends with guidance to refine the research question and start preparing a protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 7","pages":"659-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1987","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141584125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrospective assessment of medication patterns among candidates evaluated for living kidney donation 对接受活体肾脏捐献评估的候选人用药模式的回顾性评估
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1988
Drew T. Dickinson Pharm.D., MPH, Linh Nguyen Pharm.D., Xinqi Liu Pharm.D., Gianna Castro, Morgan Cherry B.S., Fadel Dadabaev, Hercys Sanchez Rodriguez, Gregory E. Malat Pharm.D., Abigail Forte Pharm.D., Ty B. Dunn M.D., M.S., Robert R. Redfield III M.D., Amanda Leonberg-Yoo M.D., M.S., Jennifer Trofe-Clark Pharm.D., FCCP

Introduction

Medication use in living kidney donor (LKD) candidates may have important implications for evaluation and donation care. We sought to characterize LKD candidate medication use through medication histories conducted at nephrologist evaluation and transplant pharmacist preoperative visits.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study included adult LKD candidates evaluated for donation between October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2021. Scheduled and as-needed medications for each candidate were abstracted from pre-donation medication histories collected at the evaluation visit with the nephrologist and the preoperative visit with the transplant pharmacist, if approved for donation. Medication histories from each visit were compared with each other and evaluated by therapeutic class frequency.

Results

Among 213 LKD candidates (112 approved for donation and 101 declined for donation), 198 (93.0%) candidates were taking at least one prescription medication, over-the-counter agent, or dietary supplement. Antidepressants and antihypertensives were the most common prescription agents used among candidates, with antihypertensives more common among declined donors (20.8% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.042). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were more commonly identified at the evaluation visit of approved candidates compared to the preoperative visit (29.5% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and dietary supplements were more commonly identified at the preoperative visit compared to the evaluation visit (49.1% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.023).

Conclusions

The frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreased greatly between the evaluation and preoperative visit, likely reflective of discontinuation pre-donation. Characterizing medication use among candidates evaluated for LKD donation may assist donor programs with developing more targeted patient medication education. Nearly all LKD candidates were taking a medication or dietary supplement pre-donation. Transplant pharmacists are uniquely positioned to perform medication reconciliations and can also offer guidance to other team providers on best practices for this process. A better understanding of medication patterns in this population may also aid with further developing care guidelines for LKD evaluation and pre-/postoperative LKD care.

导言:活体肾脏捐献者(LKD)候选人的用药情况可能会对评估和捐献护理产生重要影响。我们试图通过肾科医生评估和移植药剂师术前访视时采集的用药史来描述活体肾脏捐献候选人的用药情况。 方法 这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了在 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 1 日期间接受捐赠评估的成年 LKD 候选人。从肾脏科医生评估就诊和移植药剂师术前就诊(如果获准捐献)时收集的捐献前用药史中摘录了每位候选人的计划用药和必需用药。将每次就诊的用药记录进行比较,并按治疗类别频率进行评估。 结果 在 213 名 LKD 候选人(112 人获准捐献,101 人拒绝捐献)中,198 人(93.0%)至少服用一种处方药、非处方药或膳食补充剂。抗抑郁药和抗高血压药是捐献者最常服用的处方药,其中抗高血压药在被拒绝的捐献者中更为常见(20.8% 对 10.7%,P = 0.042)。与术前访视相比,非甾体类抗炎药在获批捐献者的评估访视中更常见(29.5% 对 0.9%,p = 0.001),与评估访视相比,膳食补充剂在术前访视中更常见(49.1% 对 59.8%,p = 0.023)。 结论 从评估到术前就诊期间,非甾体抗炎药的使用频率大大降低,这可能反映了捐献前停药的情况。对接受 LKD 捐献评估的候选者的用药情况进行描述,可帮助捐献计划制定更有针对性的患者用药教育。几乎所有肺结核候选者在捐献前都在服用药物或膳食补充剂。移植药剂师在进行药物对账方面具有得天独厚的优势,他们还可以就这一过程的最佳实践为其他团队提供指导。更好地了解这一人群的用药模式也有助于进一步制定 LKD 评估和 LKD 术前/术后护理指南。
{"title":"Retrospective assessment of medication patterns among candidates evaluated for living kidney donation","authors":"Drew T. Dickinson Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Linh Nguyen Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Xinqi Liu Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Gianna Castro,&nbsp;Morgan Cherry B.S.,&nbsp;Fadel Dadabaev,&nbsp;Hercys Sanchez Rodriguez,&nbsp;Gregory E. Malat Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Abigail Forte Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ty B. Dunn M.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Robert R. Redfield III M.D.,&nbsp;Amanda Leonberg-Yoo M.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Jennifer Trofe-Clark Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1988","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Medication use in living kidney donor (LKD) candidates may have important implications for evaluation and donation care. We sought to characterize LKD candidate medication use through medication histories conducted at nephrologist evaluation and transplant pharmacist preoperative visits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective single-center cohort study included adult LKD candidates evaluated for donation between October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2021. Scheduled and as-needed medications for each candidate were abstracted from pre-donation medication histories collected at the evaluation visit with the nephrologist and the preoperative visit with the transplant pharmacist, if approved for donation. Medication histories from each visit were compared with each other and evaluated by therapeutic class frequency.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 213 LKD candidates (112 approved for donation and 101 declined for donation), 198 (93.0%) candidates were taking at least one prescription medication, over-the-counter agent, or dietary supplement. Antidepressants and antihypertensives were the most common prescription agents used among candidates, with antihypertensives more common among declined donors (20.8% vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.042). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were more commonly identified at the evaluation visit of approved candidates compared to the preoperative visit (29.5% vs. 0.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and dietary supplements were more commonly identified at the preoperative visit compared to the evaluation visit (49.1% vs. 59.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.023).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreased greatly between the evaluation and preoperative visit, likely reflective of discontinuation pre-donation. Characterizing medication use among candidates evaluated for LKD donation may assist donor programs with developing more targeted patient medication education. Nearly all LKD candidates were taking a medication or dietary supplement pre-donation. Transplant pharmacists are uniquely positioned to perform medication reconciliations and can also offer guidance to other team providers on best practices for this process. A better understanding of medication patterns in this population may also aid with further developing care guidelines for LKD evaluation and pre-/postoperative LKD care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 7","pages":"637-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1988","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141584124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case series: Perioperative management of patients in the ICU 病例系列:重症监护室患者的围手术期管理
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1979
Melanie Smith Condeni Pharm.D.
{"title":"Case series: Perioperative management of patients in the ICU","authors":"Melanie Smith Condeni Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1979","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"589-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best practices in online/distance pharmacy practice course didactic instruction 在线/远程药学实践课程教学的最佳做法
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1983
Dawn E. Havrda Pharm.D., FCCP, Andrew J. Crannage Pharm.D., FCCP, Angela L. Bingham Pharm.D., FCCP, Kristen M. Cook Pharm.D., Susan E. Hamblin Pharm.D., Andie E. Lloyd Pharm.D., J. Russell May Pharm.D., Jessica R. Merlo Pharm.D., Kaely G. Miller Pharm.D., MBA, Christina A. Spivey Ph.D.

This commentary provides an overview of the current literature and best practices for online learning and assessment within the didactic curriculum of pharmacy education, building on the 2022 ACCP commentary addressing remote experiential learning. Lessons learned from online delivery of curricula and best practices for programs to create the optimal online learning environment for students are reviewed. Although benefits of online learning have been found, such as flexibility, convenience, and efficient use of time, with similar short-term student performance, the potential long-term implications on pharmacy students are not fully known, particularly concerning board pass rates, job attainment, and knowledge/skills application in the workplace. This commentary reviews and recommends the types of teaching modalities that align best with an online format for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction. The most challenging part of didactic curricula to teach remotely is skills development. Proficiency in skills (e.g., compounding preparations or physical assessment) is best evaluated in person to promote student self-confidence in pharmacy practice and patient care. This commentary reviews the needed components for designing quality online courses, all in the context of remembering the significance of instructor engagement. The commentary also discusses the importance of bidirectional feedback for the instructor and student and the deliberate use of formative assessments of learning to gauge student performance. A review of online summative and high-stakes assessments is included with a focus on ensuring academic integrity while also minimizing any impact on student performance and anxiety. As pharmacy education has learned from the experiences with the COVID-19 transition to online learning, consideration should be given to best practices regarding when and how to use online modalities to teach students and foster student learning. Regardless of the format, courses should engage the student and instructor and be evaluated routinely to promote achievement of learning outcomes.

本评论在 2022 年 ACCP 关于远程体验学习的评论的基础上,概述了药学教育教学课程中在线学习和评估的现有文献和最佳实践。文章回顾了在线课程交付的经验教训,以及为学生创造最佳在线学习环境的最佳实践。尽管在线学习具有灵活性、便利性和高效利用时间等优点,而且学生的短期表现也相似,但其对药学专业学生的潜在长期影响尚不完全清楚,尤其是在考试通过率、就业率和知识/技能在工作场所的应用方面。这篇评论回顾并推荐了与在线形式最匹配的教学模式类型,以提高知识获取率和学生满意度。远程教学课程中最具挑战性的部分是技能培养。技能(如复方制剂或体格评估)的熟练程度最好当面评估,以增强学生在药学实践和患者护理方面的自信心。本评论回顾了设计高质量在线课程所需的要素,同时也提醒了教师参与的重要性。评论还讨论了教师和学生双向反馈的重要性,以及有意使用形成性学习评估来衡量学生表现的重要性。评论还回顾了在线终结性评估和高风险评估,重点是确保学术诚信,同时尽量减少对学生成绩和焦虑的影响。随着药学教育从 COVID-19 过渡到在线学习的经验中吸取教训,应考虑何时以及如何使用在线模式来教授学生并促进学生学习的最佳实践。无论采用哪种形式,课程都应让学生和教师参与其中,并定期进行评估,以促进学习成果的实现。
{"title":"Best practices in online/distance pharmacy practice course didactic instruction","authors":"Dawn E. Havrda Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Andrew J. Crannage Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Angela L. Bingham Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Kristen M. Cook Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Susan E. Hamblin Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Andie E. Lloyd Pharm.D.,&nbsp;J. Russell May Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Jessica R. Merlo Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kaely G. Miller Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Christina A. Spivey Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1983","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary provides an overview of the current literature and best practices for online learning and assessment within the didactic curriculum of pharmacy education, building on the 2022 ACCP commentary addressing remote experiential learning. Lessons learned from online delivery of curricula and best practices for programs to create the optimal online learning environment for students are reviewed. Although benefits of online learning have been found, such as flexibility, convenience, and efficient use of time, with similar short-term student performance, the potential long-term implications on pharmacy students are not fully known, particularly concerning board pass rates, job attainment, and knowledge/skills application in the workplace. This commentary reviews and recommends the types of teaching modalities that align best with an online format for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction. The most challenging part of didactic curricula to teach remotely is skills development. Proficiency in skills (e.g., compounding preparations or physical assessment) is best evaluated in person to promote student self-confidence in pharmacy practice and patient care. This commentary reviews the needed components for designing quality online courses, all in the context of remembering the significance of instructor engagement. The commentary also discusses the importance of bidirectional feedback for the instructor and student and the deliberate use of formative assessments of learning to gauge student performance. A review of online summative and high-stakes assessments is included with a focus on ensuring academic integrity while also minimizing any impact on student performance and anxiety. As pharmacy education has learned from the experiences with the COVID-19 transition to online learning, consideration should be given to best practices regarding when and how to use online modalities to teach students and foster student learning. Regardless of the format, courses should engage the student and instructor and be evaluated routinely to promote achievement of learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 7","pages":"670-676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141583853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A change to the pathway: The Impact of the Supreme Court of the United States affirmative action decision on clinical pharmacy and a call to action for pharmacists 改变途径:美国最高法院平权裁决对临床药学的影响以及对药剂师的行动呼吁
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1961
Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir Pharm.D., MPH, Tyler Marie Kiles Pharm.D., John M. Allen Pharm.D., FCCP, Hope E. Campbell Pharm.D.
{"title":"A change to the pathway: The Impact of the Supreme Court of the United States affirmative action decision on clinical pharmacy and a call to action for pharmacists","authors":"Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Tyler Marie Kiles Pharm.D.,&nbsp;John M. Allen Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Hope E. Campbell Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1961","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1961","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"520-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141391311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge” 更正为 "药剂师主导的干预措施,以减少在医院和重症监护室出院时在急症护理环境中启动的目标药物的不当延续"
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1995

Patel, N, Dannemiller, RE, Kovacevic, MP, Dube, KM, Lupi, KE, Blum, RC, Crowley, KE. Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024; 7(4): 358366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924

In Table 3, the text “stimulants” was incorrectly spelled as “simulants.”

We apologize for this error.

Patel, N, Dannemiller, RE, Kovacevic, MP, Dube, KM, Lupi, KE, Blum, RC, Crowley, KE. 以药剂师为主导的干预措施,减少出院时在急症护理环境中开始使用的靶向药物的不适当继续使用。J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024; 7(4):https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924 在表 3 中,"兴奋剂 "被错误拼写为 "模拟剂"。对此我们深表歉意。
{"title":"Correction to “Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1995","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>Patel, N</span>, <span>Dannemiller, RE</span>, <span>Kovacevic, MP</span>, <span>Dube, KM</span>, <span>Lupi, KE</span>, <span>Blum, RC</span>, <span>Crowley, KE</span>. <span>Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge</span>. <i>J Am Coll Clin Pharm</i>. <span>2024</span>; <span>7</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>358</span>–<span>366</span>. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924\u0000 </p><p>In Table 3, the text “stimulants” was incorrectly spelled as “simulants.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 9","pages":"976-978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1995","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age-based transitions of care: Where is the pharmacist? 基于年龄的护理过渡:药剂师在哪里?
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1962
Sara W. Hovey Pharm.D., Christine Tabulov Pharm.D., Kelly L. Matson Pharm.D., Hanna Phan Pharm.D., FCCP
{"title":"Age-based transitions of care: Where is the pharmacist?","authors":"Sara W. Hovey Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christine Tabulov Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kelly L. Matson Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Hanna Phan Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1962","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1962","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"523-528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141395071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1