Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.003
Chen Jie , Yeshan Chen , Yong Yang , Rumeng Li , Bin Yang , Connie Yip , Jing Yu
Background
The target definition of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has not been standardized. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of post-chemotherapy based consolidation RT in ES-SCLC.
Methods
All ES-SCLC patients without initial brain metastases who completed ≥ 4 cycles of systemic therapy at Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 2012 to 2021 were included in this retrospective study. We correlated the site of first recurrence to the post-chemotherapy-based radiation volume (small-field). Relapse pattern, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those received and did not receive consolidation RT.
Results
A total of 152 patients were followed up for a median of 31.7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 23.9–39.6 months). The median PFS and OS of the cohort were 8.3 months (IQR, 6.1–11.2 months) and 16.2 months (IQR, 9.9–24.9 months), respectively. Thoracic consolidation RT served not only as an independent prognostic factor for improved PFS in the entire cohort, but also significantly prolonged OS in the subgroup without synchronous liver metastases. Small-field consolidation RT markedly reduced in-field recurrences (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12–0.38]; P < 0.001) without increasing out-of-field recurrences (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.13–1.16]; P = 0.080). No relapse was observed at the margin of the targets. Treatment-related toxicities were moderate, with grade 3 acute radiation pneumonia, radiation esophagitis, and bone marrow suppression rates of 8.3%, 3.1%, and 12.5%, respectively. No grade 5 toxicity occurred.
Conclusion
Small-field consolidation RT based on post-chemotherapy volume is safe and can significantly improve local control in ES-SCLC.
{"title":"Feasibility and long-term outcomes of post-chemotherapy-based consolidation radiotherapy in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer","authors":"Chen Jie , Yeshan Chen , Yong Yang , Rumeng Li , Bin Yang , Connie Yip , Jing Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The target definition of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has not been standardized. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of post-chemotherapy based consolidation RT in ES-SCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All ES-SCLC patients without initial brain metastases who completed ≥ 4 cycles of systemic therapy at Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 2012 to 2021 were included in this retrospective study. We correlated the site of first recurrence to the post-chemotherapy-based radiation volume (small-field). Relapse pattern, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those received and did not receive consolidation RT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 152 patients were followed up for a median of 31.7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 23.9–39.6 months). The median PFS and OS of the cohort were 8.3 months (IQR, 6.1–11.2 months) and 16.2 months (IQR, 9.9–24.9 months), respectively. Thoracic consolidation RT served not only as an independent prognostic factor for improved PFS in the entire cohort, but also significantly prolonged OS in the subgroup without synchronous liver metastases. Small-field consolidation RT markedly reduced in-field recurrences (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12–0.38]; <em>P</em> < 0.001) without increasing out-of-field recurrences (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.13–1.16]; <em>P =</em> 0.080). No relapse was observed at the margin of the targets. Treatment-related toxicities were moderate, with grade 3 acute radiation pneumonia, radiation esophagitis, and bone marrow suppression rates of 8.3%, 3.1%, and 12.5%, respectively. No grade 5 toxicity occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Small-field consolidation RT based on post-chemotherapy volume is safe and can significantly improve local control in ES-SCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47476678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.005
Ruixiang Zhang , Zhen Wang , Xiaozheng Kang , Xin Wang , Bo Zhang , Hoi-loi Ng , Liyan Xue , Wenjing Yang , Liming Shi , Hui Wang , Lvhua Wang , Yin Li , Esophageal Cancer Quality Control Expert Committee of the National Cancer Center
Esophageal cancer (EC) is particularly common in China. With the continuing progress of multi-disciplinary therapy including early screening, minimally invasive techniques, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival of EC has been improved in China. However, there are considerable disparities in the diagnosis and treatment quality among different regions. The Esophageal Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Quality Control Center (NCQCC) considers a set of authoritative quality control standards as an opportunity to eliminate the disparities and improve the overall survival and quality of life of EC. To further promote the quality control for standardized diagnosis and treatment of EC, the National Cancer Center commissioned the Esophageal Cancer Quality Control Expert Committee to draft and formulate the Chinese Quality Control Indices for Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer (2022 edition). The Indices includes 21 items that cover all key areas in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer, such as medical oncology, radiation oncology, endoscopy, and pathology.
{"title":"Quality control indices for standardized diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer in China (2022 edition)","authors":"Ruixiang Zhang , Zhen Wang , Xiaozheng Kang , Xin Wang , Bo Zhang , Hoi-loi Ng , Liyan Xue , Wenjing Yang , Liming Shi , Hui Wang , Lvhua Wang , Yin Li , Esophageal Cancer Quality Control Expert Committee of the National Cancer Center","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Esophageal cancer (EC) is particularly common in China. With the continuing progress of multi-disciplinary therapy including early screening, minimally invasive techniques, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival of EC has been improved in China. However, there are considerable disparities in the diagnosis and treatment quality among different regions. The Esophageal Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Quality Control Center (NCQCC) considers a set of authoritative quality control standards as an opportunity to eliminate the disparities and improve the overall survival and quality of life of EC. To further promote the quality control for standardized diagnosis and treatment of EC, the National Cancer Center commissioned the Esophageal Cancer Quality Control Expert Committee to draft and formulate the Chinese Quality Control Indices for Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer (2022 edition). The Indices includes 21 items that cover all key areas in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer, such as medical oncology, radiation oncology, endoscopy, and pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 167-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45667449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.003
Huizi Lei , Yun Ling , Pei Yuan , Xieqiao Yan , Lin Wang , Yanxia Shi , Xin Yao , Hong Luo , Benkang Shi , Jiyan Liu , Zhisong He , Guohua Yu , Weiqing Han , Changlu Hu , Zhihong Chi , Chuanliang Cui , Lu Si , Jianmin Fang , Jun Guo , Xinan Sheng , Jianming Ying
Background
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is related to anti-HER2 therapy in many tumors. RC48- antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has shown promising efficacy in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). The characteristic expression and scoring systems of HER2 are nonexistent in UC. We aimed to explore HER2 status and its correlation with the efficacy of HER2-targeting ADC therapy in UC.
Methods
A total of 137 and 43 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, from March 2009 to December 2018. The patients in cohort 2 were enrolled in a phase II study of RC48-ADC. UC samples were tested for HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 scoring system was adopted and modified to score HER2 expression in UC.
Results
The HER2-positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) rate was 24.1% (33/137). In HER2 IHC 2+ or 3+ patients, the HER2 gene amplification rate was 31% (13/42). The objective response rates (ORRs) in RC48-ADC-treated patients with IHC 3+, IHC 2+ and FISH+, IHC 2+ and FISH- were 58.8%, 66.7% and 40%, respectively. The ORR showed a trend toward a better benefit for RC48-ADC therapy in patients with HER2 amplification than in those without amplification (61.5% vs. 44.8%, P= 0.059). The heterogeneity of HER2 expression in the primary tumor was 55.5% (15/27), and the ORR was not significantly different between patients with tumor heterogeneity and homogeneity.
Conclusions
IHC testing should be performed to assess the HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-ADC therapy. There was a trend toward a better benefit for patients with HER2 amplification, and tumor heterogeneity did not influence the drug efficacy.
{"title":"Assessment of the expression pattern of HER2 and its correlation with HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate therapy in urothelial cancer","authors":"Huizi Lei , Yun Ling , Pei Yuan , Xieqiao Yan , Lin Wang , Yanxia Shi , Xin Yao , Hong Luo , Benkang Shi , Jiyan Liu , Zhisong He , Guohua Yu , Weiqing Han , Changlu Hu , Zhihong Chi , Chuanliang Cui , Lu Si , Jianmin Fang , Jun Guo , Xinan Sheng , Jianming Ying","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is related to anti-HER2 therapy in many tumors. RC48- antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has shown promising efficacy in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). The characteristic expression and scoring systems of HER2 are nonexistent in UC. We aimed to explore HER2 status and its correlation with the efficacy of HER2-targeting ADC therapy in UC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 137 and 43 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, from March 2009 to December 2018. The patients in cohort 2 were enrolled in a phase II study of RC48-ADC. UC samples were tested for HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence <em>in situ</em> hybridization (FISH). The 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 scoring system was adopted and modified to score HER2 expression in UC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The HER2-positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) rate was 24.1% (33/137). In HER2 IHC 2+ or 3+ patients, the <em>HER2</em> gene amplification rate was 31% (13/42). The objective response rates (ORRs) in RC48-ADC-treated patients with IHC 3+, IHC 2+ and FISH+, IHC 2+ and FISH- were 58.8%, 66.7% and 40%, respectively. The ORR showed a trend toward a better benefit for RC48-ADC therapy in patients with <em>HER2</em> amplification than in those without amplification (61.5% vs. 44.8%, <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.059). The heterogeneity of HER2 expression in the primary tumor was 55.5% (15/27), and the ORR was not significantly different between patients with tumor heterogeneity and homogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IHC testing should be performed to assess the HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-ADC therapy. There was a trend toward a better benefit for patients with <em>HER2</em> amplification, and tumor heterogeneity did not influence the drug efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45006811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.002
Paul D. Wagner, Sudhir Srivastava
For many cancers a primary cause of poor survival is that they are detected at a late stage when therapies are less effective. Although screening methods exist to detect some types of cancer at an early stage, there are currently no effective methods to screen for most types of cancer. Biomarkers have the potential to improve detection of early-stage cancers, risk stratification, and prediction of which pre-cancerous lesions are likely to progress and to make screening tests less invasive. Although thousands of research articles on biomarkers for early detection are published every year, few of these biomarkers have been validated and shown to be clinically useful. This reflects both the inherent difficulty in detecting early-stage cancers and a disconnect between the process of discovering biomarkers and their use in the clinic. To overcome this limitation the US National Cancer Institute created the Early Detection Research Network. It is a highly collaborative program that brings together biomarker discoverers, assay developers, and clinicians. It provides an infrastructure that is essential for developing and validating biomarkers and imaging methods for early cancer detection and has successfully completed several multicenter validation studies.
{"title":"National Cancer Institute's early detection research network: a model organization for biomarker research","authors":"Paul D. Wagner, Sudhir Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For many cancers a primary cause of poor survival is that they are detected at a late stage when therapies are less effective. Although screening methods exist to detect some types of cancer at an early stage, there are currently no effective methods to screen for most types of cancer. Biomarkers have the potential to improve detection of early-stage cancers, risk stratification, and prediction of which pre-cancerous lesions are likely to progress and to make screening tests less invasive. Although thousands of research articles on biomarkers for early detection are published every year, few of these biomarkers have been validated and shown to be clinically useful. This reflects both the inherent difficulty in detecting early-stage cancers and a disconnect between the process of discovering biomarkers and their use in the clinic. To overcome this limitation the US National Cancer Institute created the Early Detection Research Network. It is a highly collaborative program that brings together biomarker discoverers, assay developers, and clinicians. It provides an infrastructure that is essential for developing and validating biomarkers and imaging methods for early cancer detection and has successfully completed several multicenter validation studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42183910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.04.001
Haijia Tang , Wenhao Xu , Jiahe Lu , Aihetaimujiang Anwaier , Dingwei Ye , Hailiang Zhang
With the advancement of anticancer therapy, there is increasing interest in understanding the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a pivotal role in the TME and have been the focus of much research in recent years. CAFs play an active role in cancer progression through complex interactions with other cells in the TME, releasing regulatory factors, synthesizing and remodeling the extracellular matrix. However, research on the role of CAFs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still in its nascent stages. Here, we describe the origins and subgroups of CAFs, the roles of CAFs in the development and progression of RCC, the impact of CAFs on RCC prognosis, and the potential of CAFs as treatment targets in RCC. By analyzing CAF subsets, biomarkers, and targeted therapies, we present the significance and contribution of CAFs in RCC research. Furthermore, we highlight the distinct contribution of CAFs in advanced RCC through horizontal comparison with other cancers. This paper provides a comprehensive perspective of recent and foundational studies on the role of CAFs in RCC and other types of cancers and new insights for further study of CAFs in RCC.
{"title":"Heterogeneity and function of cancer-associated fibroblasts in renal cell carcinoma","authors":"Haijia Tang , Wenhao Xu , Jiahe Lu , Aihetaimujiang Anwaier , Dingwei Ye , Hailiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the advancement of anticancer therapy, there is increasing interest in understanding the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a pivotal role in the TME and have been the focus of much research in recent years. CAFs play an active role in cancer progression through complex interactions with other cells in the TME, releasing regulatory factors, synthesizing and remodeling the extracellular matrix. However, research on the role of CAFs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still in its nascent stages. Here, we describe the origins and subgroups of CAFs, the roles of CAFs in the development and progression of RCC, the impact of CAFs on RCC prognosis, and the potential of CAFs as treatment targets in RCC. By analyzing CAF subsets, biomarkers, and targeted therapies, we present the significance and contribution of CAFs in RCC research. Furthermore, we highlight the distinct contribution of CAFs in advanced RCC through horizontal comparison with other cancers. This paper provides a comprehensive perspective of recent and foundational studies on the role of CAFs in RCC and other types of cancers and new insights for further study of CAFs in RCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49653127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.004
Oscar Candiff , José Belderbos , Anne Lisa Wolf , Eugène Damen , Paul van Haaren , Wouter Crijns , Sandra Hol , Leen Paelinck , Zdenko van Kesteren , Jaap Jaspers , Geert de Kerf , Wouter van Elmpt , Fred Ubbels , Sanne Schagen , Dirk de Ruysscher , Michiel de Ruiter
<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>NCT01780675, a multicenter randomized phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus PCI with hippocampal sparing in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) investigated neurocognitive decline and safety. As part of quality assurance, we evaluated if hippocampal avoidance (HA)-PCI was performed according to the NCT01780675 trial protocol instructions, and performed a safety analysis to study the incidence and location of brain metastases for patients treated with HA-PCI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis evaluated the quality of the irradiation given in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing SCLC patients receiving PCI with or without hippocampal avoidance, using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The dose distribution for each patient receiving HA-PCI was retrieved and analyzed to evaluate if the treatment dose constraints were met. A questionnaire was sent out to all participating sites, and data on radiotherapy technique, pre-treatment dummy runs, phantom measurements and treatment electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry were collected and analyzed. As part of the safety analysis, the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scans on which cranial disease progression was first diagnosed were collected and matched to the radiotherapy planning dose distribution. The matched scans were reviewed to analyze the location of the brain metastases in relation to the prescribed dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 168 patients were randomized in the NCT01780675 trial in 10 centers in the Netherlands and Belgium from April 2013 until March 2018. Eighty two patients receiving HA-PCI without evidence of brain metastases were analyzed. All patients were treated with 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Dummy runs and phantom measurements were performed in all institutions prior to enrolling patients into the study. The radiotherapy (RT) plans showed a median mean bilateral hippocampal dose of 8.0 Gy, range 5.4–11.4 (constraint ≤ 8.5 Gy). In six patients (7.3%) there was a protocol violation of the mean dose in one or both hippocampi. In four of these six patients (4.9%) the mean dose to both hippocampi exceeded the constraint, in 1 patient (1.2%) only the left and in 1 patient (1.2%) only the right hippocampal mean dose was violated (average median dose left and right 8.9 Gy). All patients met the trial dose constraint of <em>V</em><sub>115%</sub> <em>PTV</em> ≤ 1%; however the <em>D</em><sub>max</sub> <em>PTV</em> constraint of ≤ 28.75 Gy was violated in 22.0% of the patients. The safety analysis showed that 14 patients (17.1%) developed cranial progression. No solitary brain metastases in the underdosed region were found. Two out of 11 patients with multiple brain metastasis developed metastasis in the underdosed region(s).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The radiotherapy quality within the
{"title":"Quality assurance and safety of hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation in the multicenter randomized phase III trial (NCT01780675)","authors":"Oscar Candiff , José Belderbos , Anne Lisa Wolf , Eugène Damen , Paul van Haaren , Wouter Crijns , Sandra Hol , Leen Paelinck , Zdenko van Kesteren , Jaap Jaspers , Geert de Kerf , Wouter van Elmpt , Fred Ubbels , Sanne Schagen , Dirk de Ruysscher , Michiel de Ruiter","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>NCT01780675, a multicenter randomized phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus PCI with hippocampal sparing in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) investigated neurocognitive decline and safety. As part of quality assurance, we evaluated if hippocampal avoidance (HA)-PCI was performed according to the NCT01780675 trial protocol instructions, and performed a safety analysis to study the incidence and location of brain metastases for patients treated with HA-PCI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis evaluated the quality of the irradiation given in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing SCLC patients receiving PCI with or without hippocampal avoidance, using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The dose distribution for each patient receiving HA-PCI was retrieved and analyzed to evaluate if the treatment dose constraints were met. A questionnaire was sent out to all participating sites, and data on radiotherapy technique, pre-treatment dummy runs, phantom measurements and treatment electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry were collected and analyzed. As part of the safety analysis, the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scans on which cranial disease progression was first diagnosed were collected and matched to the radiotherapy planning dose distribution. The matched scans were reviewed to analyze the location of the brain metastases in relation to the prescribed dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 168 patients were randomized in the NCT01780675 trial in 10 centers in the Netherlands and Belgium from April 2013 until March 2018. Eighty two patients receiving HA-PCI without evidence of brain metastases were analyzed. All patients were treated with 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Dummy runs and phantom measurements were performed in all institutions prior to enrolling patients into the study. The radiotherapy (RT) plans showed a median mean bilateral hippocampal dose of 8.0 Gy, range 5.4–11.4 (constraint ≤ 8.5 Gy). In six patients (7.3%) there was a protocol violation of the mean dose in one or both hippocampi. In four of these six patients (4.9%) the mean dose to both hippocampi exceeded the constraint, in 1 patient (1.2%) only the left and in 1 patient (1.2%) only the right hippocampal mean dose was violated (average median dose left and right 8.9 Gy). All patients met the trial dose constraint of <em>V</em><sub>115%</sub> <em>PTV</em> ≤ 1%; however the <em>D</em><sub>max</sub> <em>PTV</em> constraint of ≤ 28.75 Gy was violated in 22.0% of the patients. The safety analysis showed that 14 patients (17.1%) developed cranial progression. No solitary brain metastases in the underdosed region were found. Two out of 11 patients with multiple brain metastasis developed metastasis in the underdosed region(s).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The radiotherapy quality within the ","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42841679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.03.001
Christina Phuong , Bo Qiu , Sabine Mueller , Steve E. Braunstein
Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.
{"title":"Precision based approach to tailoring radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric central nervous system tumors","authors":"Christina Phuong , Bo Qiu , Sabine Mueller , Steve E. Braunstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42252218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.004
Huiyao Huang , Jingting Du , Xinyu Meng , Dawei Wu , Yue Yu , Shuhang Wang , Lili Wang , Wenya Wang , Yu Tang , Ning Li
Objective
To deliver a comprehensive picture of the landscape and changing trend of trials and approvals on targeted anticancer drugs in China from 2012 to 2021.
Methods
Trials, investigated products, and listed drugs were acquired from national databases. The status quo, changing trend of absolute number, and proportion of targeted trials, products, and drugs, as well as the corresponding difference between domestic and foreign companies were analyzed.
Results
A total of 2,632 trials on 1,167 targeted antitumor drugs were identified, accounting for 81.5% of all registered trials. The number and proportion of trials on targeted drugs increased steadily, with an average growth rate of 36.0% and 6.2%, respectively. A similar growth trend was observed in the number (33.7%) and proportion (13.8%) of targeted drugs. Targeted drugs and trials owned by domestic companies accounted for a higher proportion than that by foreign companies (80.5% vs. 19.5%; 83.2% vs. 16.8%, respectively), and the growing trend for both targeted drugs (13.8% vs. 5.7%) and trials (13.8% vs. 33.7%) owned by domestic companies was faster. The proportion of targeted drug trials (80.5% vs. 85.6%) and multicenter trials (6.0% vs. 69.9%) initiated by domestic companies was lower than that by foreign companies, with the gap gradually narrowing. Among the identified 18 targets of the 126 immune drugs under development, only one globally new target was found.
Conclusions
Research and development of targeted antitumor drugs in China are booming and advancing rapidly, and domestic enterprises have become the pillar. Encouraging genomics activities and establishing incentives and public–private collaboration frameworks are crucial for innovation-oriented drug development in China.
目的全面了解2012 - 2021年中国靶向抗癌药物的临床试验和审批情况及变化趋势。方法从国家数据库中获取试验、调查产品和所列药物。分析了针对性试验、产品、药品的绝对数量、比例的现状、变化趋势,以及国内外企业的差异。结果共鉴定出1,167种靶向抗肿瘤药物的2,632项试验,占所有注册试验的81.5%。靶向药物试验数量和比例稳步上升,平均增长率分别为36.0%和6.2%。靶向药物的数量(33.7%)和比例(13.8%)也出现了类似的增长趋势。国内公司拥有的靶向药物和试验占比高于国外公司(80.5% vs. 19.5%;83.2% vs. 16.8%),国内公司拥有的靶向药物(13.8% vs. 5.7%)和试验(13.8% vs. 33.7%)的增长趋势更快。国内公司开展的靶向药物试验(80.5%比85.6%)和多中心试验(6.0%比69.9%)的比例低于国外公司,且差距逐渐缩小。在126种正在开发的免疫药物中确定的18个靶点中,只有一个全球新靶点被发现。结论中国靶向抗肿瘤药物的研究和开发正在蓬勃发展,国内企业已成为支柱。鼓励基因组学活动、建立激励机制和公私合作框架对于中国以创新为导向的药物开发至关重要。
{"title":"Growing research and development of targeted anticancer drugs in China","authors":"Huiyao Huang , Jingting Du , Xinyu Meng , Dawei Wu , Yue Yu , Shuhang Wang , Lili Wang , Wenya Wang , Yu Tang , Ning Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To deliver a comprehensive picture of the landscape and changing trend of trials and approvals on targeted anticancer drugs in China from 2012 to 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Trials, investigated products, and listed drugs were acquired from national databases. The status quo, changing trend of absolute number, and proportion of targeted trials, products, and drugs, as well as the corresponding difference between domestic and foreign companies were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2,632 trials on 1,167 targeted antitumor drugs were identified, accounting for 81.5% of all registered trials. The number and proportion of trials on targeted drugs increased steadily, with an average growth rate of 36.0% and 6.2%, respectively. A similar growth trend was observed in the number (33.7%) and proportion (13.8%) of targeted drugs. Targeted drugs and trials owned by domestic companies accounted for a higher proportion than that by foreign companies (80.5% vs. 19.5%; 83.2% vs. 16.8%, respectively), and the growing trend for both targeted drugs (13.8% vs. 5.7%) and trials (13.8% vs. 33.7%) owned by domestic companies was faster. The proportion of targeted drug trials (80.5% vs. 85.6%) and multicenter trials (6.0% vs. 69.9%) initiated by domestic companies was lower than that by foreign companies, with the gap gradually narrowing. Among the identified 18 targets of the 126 immune drugs under development, only one globally new target was found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Research and development of targeted antitumor drugs in China are booming and advancing rapidly, and domestic enterprises have become the pillar. Encouraging genomics activities and establishing incentives and public–private collaboration frameworks are crucial for innovation-oriented drug development in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48655283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.001
Xin Wang , Fei Liang , Xiaomin Wang , Ye Wu , Dejun Wang , Yunjie Cheng , Jiao Li , Yougai Zhang , Bochen Sun , Yu Lin , Dandan Yu , Xiaolin Ge , Jingyi Shen , Guangyue Yao , Lei Wu , Jihong Zhang , Wei Jiang , Nan Bi , Zhilong Yu , Qifeng Wang , Luhua Wang
Objectives
To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of long-term survivors of inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive radiation therapy, the real-world trends in the use of advanced radiation techniques, and their impact on the survival outcomes of ESCC patients.
Methods
In this multicenter retrospective observational study, the medical records related to demographics and treatment of ESCC patients who were treated with definitive radiation therapy at 14 provincial hospitals in China from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016 were analyzed. A HRQL questionnaire was completed by survivors and collected by doctors at the final follow-up. The difference in quality of life between patients with or without recurrence was compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the group differences were assessed by unstratified log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model with Efron's method of tie handling was used to calculate the risk factors for OS.
Results
The data of a total of 3,308 patients were collected for this study, 248 were excluded because of missing data, and a final of 3,060 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients (2,901; 94.8%) received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)/tomotherapy (TOMO). The 5-year OS rate was 30%. Patients who received either two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT; HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.70–3.47]; P < 0.001) or three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT; HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.14–1.84]; P = 0.003) had a significantly increased risk of death compared to those who received IMRT/VMAT/TOMO. Of the 716 (23.4%) long-term survivors who completed the HRQL questionnaire, nearly 70% patients were still able to swallow normally or almost normally, and >80% patients did not experience weight loss. Nearly 80% patients found life very enjoyable or were fairly enjoying life.
Conclusions
This large, multicenter retrospective study on ESCC patients who received definitive radiation therapy found that most ESCC survivors are satisfied with their quality of life. Most patients received advanced radiation technology. Patients who received either 2DRT or 3DRT had a significantly increased risk of death compared to those who received advanced radiation technology.
{"title":"Quality of life and survival outcomes of patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiation therapy: A multicenter retrospective observational study in China from 2015 to 2016","authors":"Xin Wang , Fei Liang , Xiaomin Wang , Ye Wu , Dejun Wang , Yunjie Cheng , Jiao Li , Yougai Zhang , Bochen Sun , Yu Lin , Dandan Yu , Xiaolin Ge , Jingyi Shen , Guangyue Yao , Lei Wu , Jihong Zhang , Wei Jiang , Nan Bi , Zhilong Yu , Qifeng Wang , Luhua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of long-term survivors of inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive radiation therapy, the real-world trends in the use of advanced radiation techniques, and their impact on the survival outcomes of ESCC patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this multicenter retrospective observational study, the medical records related to demographics and treatment of ESCC patients who were treated with definitive radiation therapy at 14 provincial hospitals in China from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016 were analyzed. A HRQL questionnaire was completed by survivors and collected by doctors at the final follow-up. The difference in quality of life between patients with or without recurrence was compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the group differences were assessed by unstratified log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model with Efron's method of tie handling was used to calculate the risk factors for OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data of a total of 3,308 patients were collected for this study, 248 were excluded because of missing data, and a final of 3,060 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients (2,901; 94.8%) received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)/tomotherapy (TOMO). The 5-year OS rate was 30%. Patients who received either two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT; HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.70–3.47]; <em>P <</em> 0.001) or three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT; HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.14–1.84]; <em>P</em> = 0.003) had a significantly increased risk of death compared to those who received IMRT/VMAT/TOMO. Of the 716 (23.4%) long-term survivors who completed the HRQL questionnaire, nearly 70% patients were still able to swallow normally or almost normally, and >80% patients did not experience weight loss. Nearly 80% patients found life very enjoyable or were fairly enjoying life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This large, multicenter retrospective study on ESCC patients who received definitive radiation therapy found that most ESCC survivors are satisfied with their quality of life. Most patients received advanced radiation technology. Patients who received either 2DRT or 3DRT had a significantly increased risk of death compared to those who received advanced radiation technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48644378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.002
Yousheng Mao , Shugeng Gao , Yin Li , Chun Chen , Anlin Hao , Qun Wang , Lijie Tan , Jianqun Ma , Gaoming Xiao , Xiangning Fu , Wentao Fang , Zhigang Li , Yongtao Han , Keneng Chen , Renquan Zhang , Xiaofei Li , Tiehua Rong , Jianhua Fu , Yongyu Liu , Weimin Mao , Jie He
Background
Whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is superior to open esophagectomy (OE) in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still uncertain. Therefore, this multicenter prospective study aimed to compare MIE with OE in postoperative parameters and long-term survival.
Methods
All hospitalized patients with cT1b-3N0–1M0 thoracic ESCC treated by MIE or OE were enrolled from 19 selected centers from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the selection bias. The basic clinicopathological characteristics and 3-year overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS) of two groups were compared by R version 3.6.2.
Results
MIE were performed in 1,387 patients and OE in 335 patients. 335 cases in each group were finally matched by PSM, and no significant differences in the essential demographic characteristics were observed between the MIE and OE groups after PSM. Compared with OE, MIE had significantly less intraoperative bleeding, less total drainage volume, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and harvested significantly more lymph nodes (LNs) (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the major postoperative complications and death rates between MIE and OE. The 3-year OS and DFS were 77.0% and 68.1% in the MIE group versus 69.3% and 60.9% in the OE group (OS: P = 0.03; DFS: P = 0.09), and the rates were 75.1% and 66.5% in the MIE group versus 66.9% and 58.6% in the OE group for stage cII patients (OS: P = 0.04, DFS: P = 0.09), respectively.
Conclusions
Compared with OE, MIE is a safe and effective treatment approach with similar mortality and morbidity. It has the advantages in harvesting more LNs, improving postoperative recovery and survival of stage cII ESCC patients.
{"title":"Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (NST 1502): a multicenter prospective cohort study","authors":"Yousheng Mao , Shugeng Gao , Yin Li , Chun Chen , Anlin Hao , Qun Wang , Lijie Tan , Jianqun Ma , Gaoming Xiao , Xiangning Fu , Wentao Fang , Zhigang Li , Yongtao Han , Keneng Chen , Renquan Zhang , Xiaofei Li , Tiehua Rong , Jianhua Fu , Yongyu Liu , Weimin Mao , Jie He","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is superior to open esophagectomy (OE) in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still uncertain. Therefore, this multicenter prospective study aimed to compare MIE with OE in postoperative parameters and long-term survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All hospitalized patients with cT1b-3N0–1M0 thoracic ESCC treated by MIE or OE were enrolled from 19 selected centers from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the selection bias. The basic clinicopathological characteristics and 3-year overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS) of two groups were compared by R version 3.6.2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MIE were performed in 1,387 patients and OE in 335 patients. 335 cases in each group were finally matched by PSM, and no significant differences in the essential demographic characteristics were observed between the MIE and OE groups after PSM. Compared with OE, MIE had significantly less intraoperative bleeding, less total drainage volume, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and harvested significantly more lymph nodes (LNs) (all <em>P</em> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the major postoperative complications and death rates between MIE and OE. The 3-year OS and DFS were 77.0% and 68.1% in the MIE group versus 69.3% and 60.9% in the OE group (OS: <em>P</em> = 0.03; DFS: <em>P</em> = 0.09), and the rates were 75.1% and 66.5% in the MIE group versus 66.9% and 58.6% in the OE group for stage cII patients (OS: <em>P</em> = 0.04, DFS: <em>P</em> = 0.09), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with OE, MIE is a safe and effective treatment approach with similar mortality and morbidity. It has the advantages in harvesting more LNs, improving postoperative recovery and survival of stage cII ESCC patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 106-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49736946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}