首页 > 最新文献

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Return to play and recovery metrics after arthroscopic Bankart repair with augmentations in rugby players 橄榄球运动员关节镜下Bankart修复后的恢复指标
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100649
Yuki Miyasaka RPT, Med , Shota Hoshika MD, PhD , Keisuke Matsuki MD, PhD , Takashi Takamura RPT, MD , Hideki Kamijo MD, PhD , Tomoyuki Matsuba MD, PhD , Tomoshige Tamaki MS , Norimasa Takahashi MD, PhD , Hiroyuki Sugaya MD, PhD

Background

There is limited data on the relationship between recovery metrics, including psychological factors, and shoulder function in rugby players after arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate return to play (RTP) in rugby players who underwent shoulder stabilization for anterior shoulder instability and to assess the relationship between postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) and various recovery metrics, including performance, pain, and psychological conditions.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated subjects who underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization at our institute from January 2012 to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) rugby players with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and (2) arthroscopic Bankart repair with rotator interval closure and Hill–Sachs remplissage. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) revision surgery and (2) incomplete questionnaire at the final follow-up. A questionnaire at the final follow-up was used to evaluate the recovery metrics as a visual analog scale (VAS), including athletic performance, pain, and fear of contact. Regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the VAS scores and ROMs.

Results

Ninety-one shoulders in 82 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 32 shoulders were excluded due to revision surgery, one shoulder; incomplete questionnaire, 31 shoulders. The remaining 59 shoulders in 50 patients were included in this study. The patients consisted of 48 males and 2 females, with a mean age at surgery of 19 years (range, 14-36). The mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 13-56). The mean time to start contact practice was 7 ± 5 months (range, 3-36), and the mean time to RTP was 8 ± 5 months (range, 4-36). Forty-nine patients (98%) returned to their preinjury sports level. The median of VAS values were as follows: 91 for athletic performance (range, 25-100), 100 for pain (range, 10-100), and 70 for fear of contact (range, 10-100). ROM data were available in 52 shoulders. Multiple regression analyses showed significant relationships between total VAS scores and ROMs at postoperative three months (anterior elevation, P = .015; external rotation at the side, P = .002).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization resulted in a 98% RTP rate in rugby players. The VAS score for fear of contact was relatively low, even in patients with complete return. The total VAS value was correlated with ROMs at three months postoperatively. A rehabilitation protocol that simultaneously addresses psychological and physical aspects may be required for better RTP.
背景:关于橄榄球运动员关节镜Bankart修复后恢复指标(包括心理因素)与肩部功能之间关系的数据有限。本研究的目的是调查橄榄球运动员因前肩不稳而接受肩部稳定手术后的重返比赛(RTP)情况,并评估术后活动范围(ROMs)与各种恢复指标(包括表现、疼痛和心理状况)之间的关系。方法回顾性调查2012年1月至2022年4月在我院接受关节镜肩关节稳定治疗的患者。纳入标准如下:(1)外伤性前肩不稳的橄榄球运动员;(2)关节镜下Bankart修复伴旋转间隙闭合和Hill-Sachs复位。排除标准如下:(1)翻修手术;(2)最后随访时问卷不完整。在最后的随访中,使用一份问卷作为视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估恢复指标,包括运动表现、疼痛和接触恐惧。采用回归分析评估VAS评分与ROMs之间的关系。结果82例患者中有91例肩部符合纳入标准,32例肩部因翻修手术被排除在外,1例肩部;不完整的问卷,31肩。其余50例患者的59个肩关节被纳入本研究。患者男性48例,女性2例,手术时平均年龄19岁(14-36岁)。平均随访31个月(13-56个月)。开始接触练习的平均时间为7±5个月(范围3 ~ 36),进行RTP的平均时间为8±5个月(范围4 ~ 36)。49例(98%)患者恢复到伤前运动水平。VAS值中位数如下:运动表现为91(范围,25-100),疼痛为100(范围,10-100),害怕接触为70(范围,10-100)。52个肩胛骨有ROM数据。多元回归分析显示,术后3个月VAS总评分与ROMs之间存在显著相关(前抬高,P = 0.015;侧位外旋,P = 0.002)。结论关节镜下肩关节稳定可使橄榄球运动员的RTP率达到98%。接触恐惧的VAS评分相对较低,即使在完全康复的患者中也是如此。术后3个月VAS总值与ROMs呈正相关。为了更好的RTP,可能需要同时处理心理和生理方面的康复协议。
{"title":"Return to play and recovery metrics after arthroscopic Bankart repair with augmentations in rugby players","authors":"Yuki Miyasaka RPT, Med ,&nbsp;Shota Hoshika MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keisuke Matsuki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takashi Takamura RPT, MD ,&nbsp;Hideki Kamijo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Matsuba MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tomoshige Tamaki MS ,&nbsp;Norimasa Takahashi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Sugaya MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100649","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100649","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited data on the relationship between recovery metrics, including psychological factors, and shoulder function in rugby players after arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate return to play (RTP) in rugby players who underwent shoulder stabilization for anterior shoulder instability and to assess the relationship between postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) and various recovery metrics, including performance, pain, and psychological conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively investigated subjects who underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization at our institute from January 2012 to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) rugby players with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and (2) arthroscopic Bankart repair with rotator interval closure and Hill–Sachs remplissage. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) revision surgery and (2) incomplete questionnaire at the final follow-up. A questionnaire at the final follow-up was used to evaluate the recovery metrics as a visual analog scale (VAS), including athletic performance, pain, and fear of contact. Regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the VAS scores and ROMs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-one shoulders in 82 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 32 shoulders were excluded due to revision surgery, one shoulder; incomplete questionnaire, 31 shoulders. The remaining 59 shoulders in 50 patients were included in this study. The patients consisted of 48 males and 2 females, with a mean age at surgery of 19 years (range, 14-36). The mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 13-56). The mean time to start contact practice was 7 ± 5 months (range, 3-36), and the mean time to RTP was 8 ± 5 months (range, 4-36). Forty-nine patients (98%) returned to their preinjury sports level. The median of VAS values were as follows: 91 for athletic performance (range, 25-100), 100 for pain (range, 10-100), and 70 for fear of contact (range, 10-100). ROM data were available in 52 shoulders. Multiple regression analyses showed significant relationships between total VAS scores and ROMs at postoperative three months (anterior elevation, <em>P</em> = .015; external rotation at the side, <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization resulted in a 98% RTP rate in rugby players. The VAS score for fear of contact was relatively low, even in patients with complete return. The total VAS value was correlated with ROMs at three months postoperatively. A rehabilitation protocol that simultaneously addresses psychological and physical aspects may be required for better RTP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs. other surgical fixation methods for proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients 老年患者肱骨近端骨折逆行全肩关节置换术与其他手术固定方法的疗效比较。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100644
Julie Mekhail MS , Ryan Mullan BS , James L. Cross BS , Om Jahagirdar MS , Xuan Luo MD , Motasem Salameh MD

Background

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the most common osteoporotic injuries in elderly patients, typically resulting from low-energy mechanisms such as ground-level falls. Multiple surgical options exist, including reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and hemiarthroplasty (HA), but the optimal treatment remains debated. This up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of rTSA, HA, and ORIF for treating PHFs in the geriatric population.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched through January 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials or cohort studies comparing rTSA with HA and/or ORIF in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Two reviewers independently screened studies using predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was postoperative functional scores; secondary outcomes included: complication rates, revision surgery rates, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life metrics.

Results

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. rTSA demonstrated significantly better Constant–Murley Scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.67, P < .001), visual analog scale pain scores (SMD = −0.36, P = .034), forward flexion (SMD = 0.95, P < .001), abduction (SMD = 0.90, P < .001), and complication rates (risk ratio = 0.79, P = .047) than HA. Compared to ORIF, rTSA was associated with significantly lower revision rates (risk ratio = 0.31, P < .001), with no difference in functional outcomes or complication rates. No significant differences in mortality rates were observed between rTSA and either HA or ORIF.

Conclusion

rTSA offers superior functional outcomes and complication rates compared to HA and a more favorable revision profile than ORIF in elderly patients with PHFs. These findings support the growing preference for rTSA as the primary surgical treatment in this population, though further high-quality, long-term studies are needed to guide individualized decision-making.
背景:肱骨近端骨折(phf)是老年患者中最常见的骨质疏松性损伤之一,通常由低能机制(如地面坠落)引起。目前存在多种手术选择,包括反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)、切开复位内固定(ORIF)和半肩关节置换术(HA),但最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。这项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估rTSA、HA和ORIF治疗老年人群phf的比较有效性。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed (MEDLINE)、EMBASE和Web of Science的检索截止到2025年1月。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验或队列研究,比较rTSA与HA和/或ORIF在≥65岁患者中的应用。两位审稿人使用预定义的纳入标准独立筛选研究。主要结局为术后功能评分;次要结果包括:并发症发生率、翻修手术发生率、肩关节活动度和生活质量指标。结果:20项研究符合纳入标准。rTSA的Constant-Murley评分(标准化平均差[SMD] = 0.67, P < .001)、视觉模拟疼痛评分(SMD = -0.36, P = .034)、前屈(SMD = 0.95, P < .001)、外展(SMD = 0.90, P < .001)和并发症发生率(风险比= 0.79,P = .047)均显著优于HA。与ORIF相比,rTSA的翻修率明显较低(风险比= 0.31,P < 0.001),功能结局或并发症发生率无差异。rTSA与HA或ORIF之间的死亡率均无显著差异。结论:与HA相比,rTSA在老年phf患者中提供了更好的功能结果和并发症发生率,并且比ORIF更有利的修订资料。尽管需要进一步的高质量、长期的研究来指导个体化的决策,但这些发现支持了rTSA作为这一人群的主要手术治疗的日益增长的偏好。
{"title":"Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs. other surgical fixation methods for proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients","authors":"Julie Mekhail MS ,&nbsp;Ryan Mullan BS ,&nbsp;James L. Cross BS ,&nbsp;Om Jahagirdar MS ,&nbsp;Xuan Luo MD ,&nbsp;Motasem Salameh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100644","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100644","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the most common osteoporotic injuries in elderly patients, typically resulting from low-energy mechanisms such as ground-level falls. Multiple surgical options exist, including reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and hemiarthroplasty (HA), but the optimal treatment remains debated. This up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of rTSA, HA, and ORIF for treating PHFs in the geriatric population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched through January 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials or cohort studies comparing rTSA with HA and/or ORIF in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Two reviewers independently screened studies using predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was postoperative functional scores; secondary outcomes included: complication rates, revision surgery rates, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. rTSA demonstrated significantly better Constant–Murley Scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.67, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), visual analog scale pain scores (SMD = −0.36, <em>P</em> = .034), forward flexion (SMD = 0.95, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), abduction (SMD = 0.90, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and complication rates (risk ratio = 0.79, <em>P</em> = .047) than HA. Compared to ORIF, rTSA was associated with significantly lower revision rates (risk ratio = 0.31, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with no difference in functional outcomes or complication rates. No significant differences in mortality rates were observed between rTSA and either HA or ORIF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>rTSA offers superior functional outcomes and complication rates compared to HA and a more favorable revision profile than ORIF in elderly patients with PHFs. These findings support the growing preference for rTSA as the primary surgical treatment in this population, though further high-quality, long-term studies are needed to guide individualized decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146183716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A biomechanical comparison of hook plate vs. superolateral locking plate with coracoclavicular suture fixation for distal third clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular ligament disruption 钩钢板与喙锁骨缝合上外侧锁定钢板治疗第三锁骨远端骨折并喙锁骨韧带断裂的生物力学比较
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100645
Alexander A. Hysong MD , Jonathan Day MD , Manaswini Chennoju MS , Gabriel J. Yohe MS , Pooyan Abbasi MSc , Christopher L. Forthman MD , Aviram M. Giladi MD, MS

Background

Unstable distal third clavicle fractures involving coracoclavicular (CC) ligament disruption are prone to nonunion and often require surgical fixation. While hook plates (HPs) and superolateral locking plate (SLP) with CC suture augmentation are both commonly used, biomechanical comparisons are limited.

Methods

Eighteen fresh-frozen adult cadaveric shoulders (9 contralateral matched pairs) were randomized to receive either HPs or SLP with CC suture fixation constructs after simulated Neer type IIb distal clavicle fractures. Constructs were cyclically loaded at 70 N for 500 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing. Displacement and failure modes were recorded and statistically analyzed using paired t-tests (P < .05).

Results

At 50 N and 70 N, SLP with CC suture fixation demonstrated significantly less displacement than HPs (P < .05) across all measured cycles. Comparisons were made using a paired t-test. Mean displacement at 70 N at cycle 500 was 5.5 mm (HPs) vs. 3.0 mm (SLP with CC suture fixation). SLP with CC suture fixation constructs also had significantly higher load to failure (364.8 N vs. 281.9 N, P < .05). Failure modes differed. HPs typically failed by hook bending and screw pullout, while SLP with CC suture fixation failed primarily via suture rupture or anchor pullout.

Conclusion

SLP with CC suture fixation constructs provide superior biomechanical stability compared to HPs in Neer type IIb fractures, with less displacement and greater failure strength under load. These results support the clinical use of SLP with CC suture fixation as a robust alternative to traditional hook plating.
背景:第三锁骨远端不稳定骨折伴喙锁骨韧带断裂容易发生骨不连,通常需要手术固定。虽然钩形钢板(HPs)和上外侧锁定钢板(SLP)与CC缝合增强都是常用的,但生物力学比较是有限的。方法选取18例新鲜冷冻成人肩胛骨(9对对侧配对),在模拟Neer型IIb锁骨远端骨折后随机接受HPs或SLP联合CC缝合固定装置。结构体在70 N下循环加载500次,然后进行加载至失效测试。记录位移和失效模式,采用配对t检验进行统计学分析(P < 0.05)。结果在50 N和70 N时,CC缝合固定的SLP在所有测量周期内的位移明显小于hp (P < 0.05)。采用配对t检验进行比较。周期500时70 N的平均位移为5.5 mm (hp),而CC缝合固定的SLP为3.0 mm (hp)。使用CC缝合固定装置的SLP也明显更高的失败负荷(364.8 N比281.9 N, P < 05)。失效模式不同。HPs通常因钩弯曲和螺钉拔出而失效,而CC缝合固定的SLP主要因缝合破裂或锚拔出而失效。结论与HPs相比,slp与CC缝合固定装置在Neer型IIb骨折中具有更好的生物力学稳定性,在载荷下具有更小的位移和更大的破坏强度。这些结果支持SLP与CC缝合固定的临床应用,作为传统钩形钢板的可靠替代方案。
{"title":"A biomechanical comparison of hook plate vs. superolateral locking plate with coracoclavicular suture fixation for distal third clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular ligament disruption","authors":"Alexander A. Hysong MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Day MD ,&nbsp;Manaswini Chennoju MS ,&nbsp;Gabriel J. Yohe MS ,&nbsp;Pooyan Abbasi MSc ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Forthman MD ,&nbsp;Aviram M. Giladi MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100645","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100645","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Unstable distal third clavicle fractures involving coracoclavicular (CC) ligament disruption are prone to nonunion and often require surgical fixation. While hook plates (HPs) and superolateral locking plate (SLP) with CC suture augmentation are both commonly used, biomechanical comparisons are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen fresh-frozen adult cadaveric shoulders (9 contralateral matched pairs) were randomized to receive either HPs or SLP with CC suture fixation constructs after simulated Neer type IIb distal clavicle fractures. Constructs were cyclically loaded at 70 N for 500 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing. Displacement and failure modes were recorded and statistically analyzed using paired <em>t</em>-tests (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 50 N and 70 N, SLP with CC suture fixation demonstrated significantly less displacement than HPs (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) across all measured cycles. Comparisons were made using a paired <em>t</em>-test. Mean displacement at 70 N at cycle 500 was 5.5 mm (HPs) vs. 3.0 mm (SLP with CC suture fixation). SLP with CC suture fixation constructs also had significantly higher load to failure (364.8 N vs. 281.9 N, <em>P</em> &lt; .05). Failure modes differed. HPs typically failed by hook bending and screw pullout, while SLP with CC suture fixation failed primarily via suture rupture or anchor pullout.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SLP with CC suture fixation constructs provide superior biomechanical stability compared to HPs in Neer type IIb fractures, with less displacement and greater failure strength under load. These results support the clinical use of SLP with CC suture fixation as a robust alternative to traditional hook plating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute pectoralis major tendon tear repair with semitendinosus augmentation: case series 半腱肌增强术修复急性胸大肌肌腱撕裂:病例系列
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100653
Giovanna Medina MD, PhD, Luiz Henrique Boraschi Vieira Ribas MD, Breno Schor MD, PhD, Juliana R. Mauad MD, Antonio Guilherme Padovani Garofo MD
{"title":"Acute pectoralis major tendon tear repair with semitendinosus augmentation: case series","authors":"Giovanna Medina MD, PhD,&nbsp;Luiz Henrique Boraschi Vieira Ribas MD,&nbsp;Breno Schor MD, PhD,&nbsp;Juliana R. Mauad MD,&nbsp;Antonio Guilherme Padovani Garofo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100653","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100653","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Severe glenohumeral ankylosis following revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty 复位肩关节置换术后严重肩关节强直
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100647
Artem Klimov MD , Florian Freislederer MD , Alexander Pieringer MD , Markus Scheibel MD
{"title":"Severe glenohumeral ankylosis following revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Artem Klimov MD ,&nbsp;Florian Freislederer MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Pieringer MD ,&nbsp;Markus Scheibel MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100647","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100647","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A modern advanced analytic approach to cost and performance loss analysis of ulnar collateral ligament surgery to Major League Baseball teams 一个现代先进的分析方法,以成本和性能损失分析的尺副韧带手术,以美国职业棒球大联盟球队
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100651
Michael A. Mastroianni MD, Ritt R. Givens MD, Dongyeon J. Kim MD, Matthew R. LeVasseur MD, Andrew J. Luzzi MD, Frank J. Alexander MS, ATC, Christopher S. Ahmad MD

Background

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery has become increasingly prevalent among Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. While its clinical implications have been extensively studied, the economic and performance impact on MLB teams remains incompletely understood.

Methods

Cost analysis on all MLB pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2014 and 2024 was conducted. Pitchers were identified, and data were collected using public databases affiliated with MLB and used in previous studies. Economic losses were calculated using 2 primary components: (1) salary cost of recovery (COR), which quantified salaries paid to injured players during recovery, and (2) performance cost, a metric we defined using common FanGraphs wins above replacement (fWAR) conversions to estimate lost player contributions.

Results

During the study period, a total of 276 UCL surgeries were performed from 2014 to 2024. Over the past 5 seasons (2020-2024), the number of UCL reconstructions in MLB pitchers has significantly increased to an average of 29.0 ± 4.7 surgeries per year compared to 21.8 ± 4.3 surgeries per year the 6 seasons prior (2014-2019; P = .05), with a peak of 35 surgeries in 2023. From 2014 to 2024, the COR salary losses adjusted for inflation totaled over $1.26 billion, with an increase in average COR over the past 5 seasons ($141 million ± 72 million) compared to the 6 seasons prior ($92 million ± 52 million; P = .14). The estimated COR per player for starters, relievers, and closers was $7.3 million, $2.3 million, and $11.5 million, respectively. The average cumulative fWAR lost per pitcher was 1.9, translating to an estimated annual market loss of $14.3 million per player. The total cumulative fWAR loss across all players was 452.8. Using the conversion of 1 fWAR is equal to approximately $7.5 million in salary, an estimated $3.4 billion worth of performance value was lost for the entire study period.

Conclusion

UCL injuries that require surgery impose an increasingly significant financial burden on MLB teams, leading to the loss of $1.26 billion dollars in salary paid out to injured players and likely over $3 billion worth of performance value lost to injury to teams over 10 years. Players also struggle to provide the same value in fWAR as they did prior to injury. This study shows that investing in UCL prevention and recovery efforts can potentially save teams, players, and local communities millions of dollars.
背景:双侧副韧带(UCL)手术在美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)投手中越来越普遍。虽然其临床意义已被广泛研究,但对MLB球队的经济和表现影响仍未完全了解。方法对2014 - 2024年所有接受UCL重建的MLB投手进行成本分析。确定投手,并使用MLB附属的公共数据库收集数据,并在先前的研究中使用。经济损失是通过2个主要组成部分来计算的:(1)恢复工资成本(COR),它量化了受伤球员在恢复期间支付的工资;(2)表现成本,我们使用常见的FanGraphs胜率高于替换率(fWAR)转换来定义这一指标,以估计损失的球员贡献。结果在研究期间,2014 - 2024年共进行了276例UCL手术。在过去的5个赛季(2020-2024)中,MLB投手的UCL重建次数从之前的6个赛季(2014-2019;P = 0.05)平均每年21.8±4.3次增加到29.0±4.7次,2023年达到了35次的峰值。从2014年到2024年,经通货膨胀调整后的COR工资损失总计超过12.6亿美元,与之前的6个赛季(9200万±5200万美元,P = .14)相比,过去5个赛季的平均COR增加了1.41亿±7200万美元。先发投手、中继投手和关闭投手的人均年薪分别为730万美元、230万美元和1150万美元。每位投手的平均累计fWAR损失为1.9,换算成每位球员每年的市场损失估计为1430万美元。所有玩家的累计fWAR损失总额为452.8。如果将1个月的薪金换算为大约750万美元,整个研究期间估计损失了价值34亿美元的业绩价值。需要手术的ucl伤病给MLB球队带来了越来越大的经济负担,导致伤病球员的工资损失12.6亿美元,10年内伤病给球队带来的绩效价值损失可能超过30亿美元。玩家也很难在fWAR中提供与受伤前相同的价值。这项研究表明,投资于伦敦大学学院的预防和恢复工作可以潜在地为球队、球员和当地社区节省数百万美元。
{"title":"A modern advanced analytic approach to cost and performance loss analysis of ulnar collateral ligament surgery to Major League Baseball teams","authors":"Michael A. Mastroianni MD,&nbsp;Ritt R. Givens MD,&nbsp;Dongyeon J. Kim MD,&nbsp;Matthew R. LeVasseur MD,&nbsp;Andrew J. Luzzi MD,&nbsp;Frank J. Alexander MS, ATC,&nbsp;Christopher S. Ahmad MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100651","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100651","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery has become increasingly prevalent among Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. While its clinical implications have been extensively studied, the economic and performance impact on MLB teams remains incompletely understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cost analysis on all MLB pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2014 and 2024 was conducted. Pitchers were identified, and data were collected using public databases affiliated with MLB and used in previous studies. Economic losses were calculated using 2 primary components: (1) salary cost of recovery (COR), which quantified salaries paid to injured players during recovery, and (2) performance cost, a metric we defined using common FanGraphs wins above replacement (fWAR) conversions to estimate lost player contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, a total of 276 UCL surgeries were performed from 2014 to 2024. Over the past 5 seasons (2020-2024), the number of UCL reconstructions in MLB pitchers has significantly increased to an average of 29.0 ± 4.7 surgeries per year compared to 21.8 ± 4.3 surgeries per year the 6 seasons prior (2014-2019; <em>P</em> = .05), with a peak of 35 surgeries in 2023. From 2014 to 2024, the COR salary losses adjusted for inflation totaled over $1.26 billion, with an increase in average COR over the past 5 seasons ($141 million ± 72 million) compared to the 6 seasons prior ($92 million ± 52 million; <em>P</em> = .14). The estimated COR per player for starters, relievers, and closers was $7.3 million, $2.3 million, and $11.5 million, respectively. The average cumulative fWAR lost per pitcher was 1.9, translating to an estimated annual market loss of $14.3 million per player. The total cumulative fWAR loss across all players was 452.8. Using the conversion of 1 fWAR is equal to approximately $7.5 million in salary, an estimated $3.4 billion worth of performance value was lost for the entire study period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UCL injuries that require surgery impose an increasingly significant financial burden on MLB teams, leading to the loss of $1.26 billion dollars in salary paid out to injured players and likely over $3 billion worth of performance value lost to injury to teams over 10 years. Players also struggle to provide the same value in fWAR as they did prior to injury. This study shows that investing in UCL prevention and recovery efforts can potentially save teams, players, and local communities millions of dollars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Talus allograft for bipolar bone loss in locked anterior shoulder fracture dislocation 同种距骨移植治疗锁定型肩前骨折脱位双极骨丢失
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100652
Cameron R. Guy MD, Jonathan Burke MS, ATC, Tyler Thorne MD, Christopher D. Joyce MD
{"title":"Talus allograft for bipolar bone loss in locked anterior shoulder fracture dislocation","authors":"Cameron R. Guy MD,&nbsp;Jonathan Burke MS, ATC,&nbsp;Tyler Thorne MD,&nbsp;Christopher D. Joyce MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100652","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100652","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomical characterization of sternoclavicular joint and correlation of arthroscopic portals and structures at risk: a cadaveric study on Colombian specimen 胸锁关节的解剖特征和关节镜下门静脉和危险结构的相关性:哥伦比亚标本的尸体研究
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100650
Fabio Alfonso Suarez Romero MD , Deisy Consuelo Celeita Medina MD , María Camila Ruiz Cardenas MD , Andrea Juliana Hernández Caicedo MD , Federico Suarez MD

Background

The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is a synovial saddle joint and the only articulation between the axial skeleton and the upper limb. Although SCJ pathology is rare, it may include degenerative, autoimmune, infectious, tumoral, or traumatic conditions. Arthroscopic approaches to this region carry a risk of damaging vital mediastinal structures. This study aims to anatomically characterize the SCJ and surrounding neurovascular structures, emphasizing the posterior capsule as a critical safety barrier during arthroscopy.

Methods

Ten cadaveric specimens were bilaterally dissected. Arthroscopic portals were first marked and used to identify the posterior capsule. Open dissections were performed to measure the distances between the portals and nearby mediastinal structures using digital calipers. Data were recorded in Excel 2024 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA) and analyzed with SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The posterior capsule consistently acted as a protective boundary between the joint and mediastinal structures. The average distances from the superomedial (SM) and inferolateral (IL) portals to the posterior capsule were 26.3 mm and 26.5 mm, respectively. From the posterior capsule, the average distances to key mediastinal structures were: common carotid artery: 42.5 mm (SM), 44.1 mm (IL), brachiocephalic trunk: 40.5 mm (SM), 43.5 mm (IL), innominate vein: 37.8 mm (SM), 39.7 mm (IL), and vagus nerve: 45.4 mm (SM), 46.5 mm (IL).

Discussion and/or Conclusion

The posterior capsule provides a reliable anatomical safety margin between the SCJ and vital mediastinal structures. During SCJ arthroscopy, referencing the anterior sternoclavicular ligament and maintaining a minimum 5.1 cm safety margin posteriorly can minimize the risk of catastrophic injury. These findings support safer surgical planning and highlight the importance of precise portal placement.
背景:胸锁关节(SCJ)是滑膜鞍状关节,是中轴骨和上肢之间唯一的关节。虽然SCJ病理是罕见的,它可能包括退行性,自身免疫性,感染性,肿瘤,或创伤性条件。关节镜入路有破坏重要纵隔结构的风险。本研究旨在解剖表征SCJ及其周围的神经血管结构,强调后囊膜作为关节镜检查时关键的安全屏障。方法双侧解剖10例尸体标本。关节镜下的门静脉首先被标记并用于识别后囊。使用数字卡尺进行开放解剖以测量门静脉和附近纵隔结构之间的距离。数据记录在Excel 2024 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA)和REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA)中,并使用SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)进行分析。结果后囊始终是关节和纵隔结构之间的保护边界。从内侧门静脉(SM)和外侧门静脉(IL)到后囊的平均距离分别为26.3 mm和26.5 mm。从后囊到主要纵隔结构的平均距离为:颈总动脉:42.5 mm (SM), 44.1 mm (IL),头臂干:40.5 mm (SM), 43.5 mm (IL),无名静脉:37.8 mm (SM), 39.7 mm (IL),迷走神经:45.4 mm (SM), 46.5 mm (IL)。讨论和/或结论后囊在骶髂关节和重要纵隔结构之间提供了可靠的解剖安全边界。在SCJ关节镜检查时,参照胸锁前韧带并保持至少5.1 cm的安全缘,可以最大限度地减少灾难性损伤的风险。这些发现支持更安全的手术计划,并强调精确放置门静脉的重要性。
{"title":"Anatomical characterization of sternoclavicular joint and correlation of arthroscopic portals and structures at risk: a cadaveric study on Colombian specimen","authors":"Fabio Alfonso Suarez Romero MD ,&nbsp;Deisy Consuelo Celeita Medina MD ,&nbsp;María Camila Ruiz Cardenas MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Juliana Hernández Caicedo MD ,&nbsp;Federico Suarez MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100650","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100650","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is a synovial saddle joint and the only articulation between the axial skeleton and the upper limb. Although SCJ pathology is rare, it may include degenerative, autoimmune, infectious, tumoral, or traumatic conditions. Arthroscopic approaches to this region carry a risk of damaging vital mediastinal structures. This study aims to anatomically characterize the SCJ and surrounding neurovascular structures, emphasizing the posterior capsule as a critical safety barrier during arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten cadaveric specimens were bilaterally dissected. Arthroscopic portals were first marked and used to identify the posterior capsule. Open dissections were performed to measure the distances between the portals and nearby mediastinal structures using digital calipers. Data were recorded in Excel 2024 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA) and analyzed with SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The posterior capsule consistently acted as a protective boundary between the joint and mediastinal structures. The average distances from the superomedial (SM) and inferolateral (IL) portals to the posterior capsule were 26.3 mm and 26.5 mm, respectively. From the posterior capsule, the average distances to key mediastinal structures were: common carotid artery: 42.5 mm (SM), 44.1 mm (IL), brachiocephalic trunk: 40.5 mm (SM), 43.5 mm (IL), innominate vein: 37.8 mm (SM), 39.7 mm (IL), and vagus nerve: 45.4 mm (SM), 46.5 mm (IL).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and/or Conclusion</h3><div>The posterior capsule provides a reliable anatomical safety margin between the SCJ and vital mediastinal structures. During SCJ arthroscopy, referencing the anterior sternoclavicular ligament and maintaining a minimum 5.1 cm safety margin posteriorly can minimize the risk of catastrophic injury. These findings support safer surgical planning and highlight the importance of precise portal placement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical outcomes of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus associated with olecranon fractures 肱骨远端冠状面剪切骨折合并鹰嘴骨折的临床疗效分析
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100654
Momosuke Shoda MD , Takahiro Yamazaki MD, PhD , Yusuke Matsuura MD, PhD , Takeru Ohara MD, PhD , Hiromasa Wakita MD, PhD , Seiji Ohtori MD, PhD

Background

Coronal shear fracture (CSF) of the distal humerus is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of elbow fractures; cases combined with olecranon fracture are even rarer. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between surgical methods and clinical outcomes in this uncommon injury.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2025, we retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (8 elbows) with CSF associated with olecranon fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation in a multicenter case series and were followed for more than 6 months. Patient demographics, fracture classifications, surgical methods, postoperative complications, additional surgeries, elbow range of motion, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at the final follow-up were analyzed descriptively.

Results

The mean age was 64 years (range, 51–79 years), and the mean follow-up was 27 months (range, 10–96 months). Dubberley classification was type 2A in 2 cases, type 3A in 2, and type 3B in 4. A posterolateral extended approach was used in 6 patients and a combined lateral–posterior approach in 2. Postoperative complications included elbow release in 2 cases and ulnar neuropathy in 2. At final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.5 (range, 75–100), and the mean range of motion was −21°/121.3°.

Conclusion

Outcomes of CSF with concomitant olecranon fracture appeared to depend on CSF severity, and complications were more frequent than in isolated CSF. Given the small sample size and observational design, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive evidence favoring any particular method.
背景:肱骨远端冠状面剪切骨折(CSF)很少见,约占肘部骨折的1%;合并鹰嘴骨折的病例更为罕见。本研究旨在阐明这种罕见损伤的手术方法与临床结果之间的关系。方法在2017年至2025年期间,我们回顾性分析了8例(8肘部)脑脊液伴鹰嘴骨折的患者,这些患者在多中心病例系列中接受了切开复位和内固定,随访时间超过6个月。对患者人口统计学、骨折分类、手术方法、术后并发症、额外手术、肘关节活动度和Mayo肘关节功能评分进行描述性分析。结果患者平均年龄64岁(51 ~ 79岁),平均随访27个月(10 ~ 96个月)。Dubberley分型2A型2例,3A型2例,3B型4例。6例患者采用后外侧扩展入路,2例采用后外侧联合入路。术后并发症包括肘关节松解2例,尺神经病变2例。在最后随访时,Mayo肘关节功能评分平均值为92.5(范围,75-100),平均活动范围为- 21°/121.3°。结论脑脊液合并鹰嘴骨折的预后与脑脊液严重程度有关,并发症发生率高于单纯脑脊液。考虑到小样本量和观察设计,这些发现应被视为初步和假设生成,而不是支持任何特定方法的明确证据。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus associated with olecranon fractures","authors":"Momosuke Shoda MD ,&nbsp;Takahiro Yamazaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yusuke Matsuura MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takeru Ohara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiromasa Wakita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Seiji Ohtori MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100654","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100654","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronal shear fracture (CSF) of the distal humerus is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of elbow fractures; cases combined with olecranon fracture are even rarer. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between surgical methods and clinical outcomes in this uncommon injury.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 2017 and 2025, we retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (8 elbows) with CSF associated with olecranon fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation in a multicenter case series and were followed for more than 6 months. Patient demographics, fracture classifications, surgical methods, postoperative complications, additional surgeries, elbow range of motion, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at the final follow-up were analyzed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age was 64 years (range, 51–79 years), and the mean follow-up was 27 months (range, 10–96 months). Dubberley classification was type 2A in 2 cases, type 3A in 2, and type 3B in 4. A posterolateral extended approach was used in 6 patients and a combined lateral–posterior approach in 2. Postoperative complications included elbow release in 2 cases and ulnar neuropathy in 2. At final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.5 (range, 75–100), and the mean range of motion was −21°/121.3°.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Outcomes of CSF with concomitant olecranon fracture appeared to depend on CSF severity, and complications were more frequent than in isolated CSF. Given the small sample size and observational design, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive evidence favoring any particular method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of inpatient charges and costs between revision and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the New York state 纽约州翻修和初次全肘关节置换术住院费用的比较
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100648
Dashaun A. Ragland BS , Brian O. Molokwu MS , Jacquelyn J. Xu MA , Andrew J. Cecora BS , Sallie Yassin MS , Erel Ben-Ari MD , Joseph A. Bosco III MD , Mandeep S. Virk MD

Background

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in inpatient charges between primary (pTEA) and revision (rTEA) total elbow arthroplasty among Medicare and Medicaid patients. Our secondary aim is to assess whether these charges vary across hospitals with differing total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) procedural volumes. We hypothesize that rTEA would be more expensive than pTEA and that charges would be higher for low-volume hospitals.

Methods

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for all Medicare and Medicaid Services patients who underwent a pTEA or rTEA in New York State from 2010 to 2020. Hospitals were classified as high-volume (≥3 surgeries/year), medium-volume (between 2-3 surgeries/year), or low-volume (less than 2 surgeries/year). Facilities performing fewer than 1 surgery per year or with fewer than 4 years of TEA data were excluded. Total inpatient charges were collected and subsequently subdivided into ancillary and accommodation charges. Inpatient charges and readmission data were compared across the 2 procedures and volume groups.

Results

During the study period, 1,303 patients underwent pTEA and 273 underwent rTEA. After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, and hospital volume, rTEA was independently associated with significantly higher accommodation, ancillary, and total inpatient charges (P < .001 for all). Additionally, rTEA patients had a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission (P = .005) and longer inpatient stays (P < .001) compared to pTEA patients. There were observable differences in total, accommodation, and ancillary charges across hospital volume groups for both pTEA and rTEA. Low-volume hospitals demonstrated the highest total charges for pTEA during the study period vs. high- and medium- volume hospitals (P < .001 for pTEA, P > .05 for rTEA).

Conclusion

rTEA is associated with longer inpatient stay, higher inpatient charges, and greater readmission rates compared to pTEA. Primary TEA in low-volume hospitals is associated with higher total charges compared to medium and high-volume hospitals. These findings provide valuable insights for hospital administrators and public health officials aiming to create effective strategies to manage costs and combat the growing burden of healthcare expenses in the United States.
本研究的主要目的是评估在医疗保险和医疗补助患者中,初级(pTEA)和改良(rTEA)全肘关节置换术住院费用的差异。我们的第二个目的是评估不同医院的全肘关节置换术(TEA)手术量是否不同。我们假设rTEA会比pTEA更昂贵,对于小容量的医院收费会更高。方法查询2010年至2020年在纽约州接受pTEA或rTEA的所有医疗保险和医疗补助服务患者的全州计划和研究合作系统数据库。医院被分为大容量(≥3台/年)、中容量(2-3台/年)和小容量(少于2台/年)。排除了每年少于1例手术或TEA数据少于4年的机构。收集住院总费用,然后细分为辅助费用和住宿费。住院费用和再入院数据在两个程序和容量组之间进行比较。结果在研究期间,1303例患者接受了pTEA, 273例接受了rTEA。在对患者年龄、性别、种族和医院容量进行调整后,rTEA与较高的住院费用、辅助费用和住院总费用独立相关(P < 0.001)。此外,与pTEA患者相比,rTEA患者90天再入院的可能性更高(P = 0.005),住院时间更长(P < 0.001)。pTEA和rTEA的总费用、住院费用和辅助费用在各医院容量组中都有显著差异。在研究期间,与大中型医院相比,小规模医院的pTEA总费用最高(pTEA为P <; 001, rTEA为P >; 05)。结论与pTEA相比,tea与更长的住院时间、更高的住院费用和更高的再入院率相关。与中型和大型医院相比,小规模医院的初级TEA与更高的总收费有关。这些发现为医院管理者和公共卫生官员提供了有价值的见解,旨在制定有效的策略来管理成本,并与美国日益增长的医疗费用负担作斗争。
{"title":"Comparison of inpatient charges and costs between revision and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the New York state","authors":"Dashaun A. Ragland BS ,&nbsp;Brian O. Molokwu MS ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn J. Xu MA ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Cecora BS ,&nbsp;Sallie Yassin MS ,&nbsp;Erel Ben-Ari MD ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Bosco III MD ,&nbsp;Mandeep S. Virk MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100648","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100648","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in inpatient charges between primary (pTEA) and revision (rTEA) total elbow arthroplasty among Medicare and Medicaid patients. Our secondary aim is to assess whether these charges vary across hospitals with differing total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) procedural volumes. We hypothesize that rTEA would be more expensive than pTEA and that charges would be higher for low-volume hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for all Medicare and Medicaid Services patients who underwent a pTEA or rTEA in New York State from 2010 to 2020. Hospitals were classified as high-volume (≥3 surgeries/year), medium-volume (between 2-3 surgeries/year), or low-volume (less than 2 surgeries/year). Facilities performing fewer than 1 surgery per year or with fewer than 4 years of TEA data were excluded. Total inpatient charges were collected and subsequently subdivided into ancillary and accommodation charges. Inpatient charges and readmission data were compared across the 2 procedures and volume groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 1,303 patients underwent pTEA and 273 underwent rTEA. After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, and hospital volume, rTEA was independently associated with significantly higher accommodation, ancillary, and total inpatient charges (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 for all). Additionally, rTEA patients had a higher likelihood of 90-day readmission (<em>P</em> = .005) and longer inpatient stays (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared to pTEA patients. There were observable differences in total, accommodation, and ancillary charges across hospital volume groups for both pTEA and rTEA. Low-volume hospitals demonstrated the highest total charges for pTEA during the study period vs. high- and medium- volume hospitals (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 for pTEA, <em>P</em> &gt; .05 for rTEA).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>rTEA is associated with longer inpatient stay, higher inpatient charges, and greater readmission rates compared to pTEA. Primary TEA in low-volume hospitals is associated with higher total charges compared to medium and high-volume hospitals. These findings provide valuable insights for hospital administrators and public health officials aiming to create effective strategies to manage costs and combat the growing burden of healthcare expenses in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSES reviews, reports, and techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1