JSES reviews, reports, and techniques最新文献

{"title":"Pectoralis major transfer over vs. under the conjoint tendon for the treatment of irreparable subscapularis rupture: a systematic review comparing clinical outcomes, complications, and failure rates","authors":"Ross Clarke ScM ,&nbsp;Lema Abuoqab BS ,&nbsp;Brian S. Tao BA ,&nbsp;Paul Sherban MA ,&nbsp;Mohammad Abdelaal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kevin A. Hao MD ,&nbsp;Joseph W. Galvin DO ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Bortman MD ,&nbsp;Brian R. Waterman MD ,&nbsp;Josef K. Eichinger MD ,&nbsp;Xinning Li MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100600","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100600","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transfer of the pectoralis major muscle tendon unit has proven to be an effective solution for reconstituting the force couple after rotator cuff tears involving an irreparable subscapularis tendon. The tendon can be routed over or under the conjoint tendon; however, it is unclear if tendon routing influences postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rates and clinical outcome measures between pectoralis major transfer performed with a subcoracoid vs. supracoracoid tendon routing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, querying MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases for studies reporting outcomes and complications following pectoralis major transfer with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. We assessed the methodological quality of each study using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies score and extracted patient demographic, surgical, and outcome data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies involving 179 shoulders (174 patients) were included. The mean patient age was 57.6 years with a follow-up of 71.5 months. Tendon routing over (n = 76 shoulders) or under (n = 103 shoulders) the conjoint tendon showed similar improvements in Constant Score (+20.4 vs. +28.6, <em>P</em> = .08). Graft failure rates were also comparable when the pectoralis major tendon was routed over vs. under the conjoint tendon (14% vs. 9%, <em>P</em> = .46). However, graft failure varied by tendon type, with the sternal head having significantly higher failure rate (27%) compared to transfers using the clavicular head (7%) and entire tendon (5%) (<em>P</em> = .02). Complication rates, additional ipsilateral shoulder surgery, and rates of patient satisfaction were similar with respect to tendon placement above or below the conjoint tendon and graft type.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The complication rate, incidence of subsequent surgery, and Constant–Murley Score did not differ based on whether the pectoralis major tendon was placed over or under the conjoint tendon during transfers. However, graft failure rates were greater in cohorts using only the sternocostal head of the pectoralis major tendon, while all other outcomes were similar.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Glenoid grafting in the first stage of 2-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of infection: a technical note","authors":"David Sylvester BS,&nbsp;Kassem Ghayyad MD,&nbsp;Daniel Goltz MD,&nbsp;G. Russell Huffman MD, MPH, FAAOS","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100598","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100598","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Olecranon bursal repair for chronic traumatic bursitis: a surgical technique","authors":"Álvaro Javier Muratore MD ,&nbsp;Nadia Gabotto Loredo MD ,&nbsp;Gonzalo Martín Viollaz MD ,&nbsp;Denise Hammoe MD ,&nbsp;Gómez Rodriguez Gustavo MD ,&nbsp;Diego José Gómez MD ,&nbsp;Alejandro Tedeschi MD ,&nbsp;Gustavo Teruya MD ,&nbsp;Rafael Duran MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100597","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100597","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction of major humeral deformity from acquired ricket using a 3D personalized osteotomy guide","authors":"Mamoun Belkebir Mrani MD,&nbsp;Romain Carlat MD,&nbsp;Bruno Vincent MD,&nbsp;Faouzi Abou-Messaoud MD,&nbsp;Serge Ayong MD,&nbsp;Julien Coquay MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100594","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100594","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The cruciate double rip-stop technique: an all-suture distal triceps tendon repair technique combining a pulley mechanism and racking hitch knots","authors":"Christian S. Rosenow MD ,&nbsp;Parag Raval MBBS BSc (Hons), MRCS (Eng) FRCS (Tr & Orth) ,&nbsp;Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Morrey MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100595","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100595","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Salter-Harris type III fracture-dislocation of the glenoid: a case report","authors":"Brandon L. Ziegenfuss BSc (Hons), MPH ,&nbsp;Tristan Shuker BSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Kenneth Cutbush MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthA","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100596","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100596","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring the level of association between rotator cuff tears and acromiohumeral distance: a systematic review","authors":"Saria Alharairi MSc (in Rehabilitation Sciences),&nbsp;Joshua Vincent PhD (in Rehabilitation Sciences)","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100593","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100593","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a prevalent cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction, often associated with narrowing of the acromiohumeral distance (AHD). AHD is commonly used as a valuable marker of rotator cuff integrity, yet its diagnostic and prognostic value remains debated. This systematic review aims to explore the relationship between AHD and RCTs, with consideration of tear type, imaging modality, and tendon involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science was conducted to identify comparative studies published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with chronic or acute RCTs (partial or full-thickness) and healthy controls. Studies were required to report AHD measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, radiographs, or ultrasound in an upright, neutral shoulder position. Risk of bias was assessed using the Hoy et al tool. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across studies, AHD was consistently defined as the shortest distance between the acromion and humeral head. Imaging modalities varied, with magnetic resonance imaging most commonly used. While several studies reported significantly reduced AHD in RCTs, particularly full-thickness and multi-tendon tears, others found no significant differences compared to controls. Mean AHD values ranged from ∼5.9 mm in massive or multi-tendon tears to ∼9.7 mm in healthy controls. Multi-tendon involvement was consistently associated with greater AHD reduction than single-tendon tears. The reliability of AHD measurement was high across modalities. However, heterogeneity in sample size, imaging tools, and lack of control for confounding factors (eg, body mass index, activity level, muscle atrophy) limited comparability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AHD tends to decrease with increasing RCT severity, particularly in multi-tendon involvement, supporting its relevance in clinical assessment. However, inconsistencies across studies highlight the need for standardized imaging protocols and consideration of confounders. While AHD shows promise as a diagnostic and prognostic marker, it should not be used in isolation. Future longitudinal and dynamic imaging studies are recommended to better understand its clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison between allograft and autograft in lower trapezius tendon transfer in irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review","authors":"Chang Hee Baek MD,&nbsp;Chaemoon Lim MD,&nbsp;Jung Gon Kim MD,&nbsp;Bo Taek Kim MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100588","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100588","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recently, lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) has gained attention as an effective treatment option for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Although the use of interpositional graft is an inevitable process in LTT, there was no study to compare the allograft and autograft as an interpositional graft in LTT. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the clinical outcome, graft retear and complications according to the interpositional graft using allograft and autograft in LTT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review was prepared with the guidelines of the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. The inclusion criteria of this systematic review were a full-length article written in English, peer-reviewed articles, level of evidence IV or higher articles, and articles reporting the clinical outcome of LTT. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid-Embase. The quality of selected articles was assessed with Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies score. The postoperative range of motion, patient-reported clinical outcome scores, graft retear, complications, and reoperations were systematically analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 299 patients of 12 articles were included in this systematic review. Among them, 230 patients of 8 articles reported the results of allograft, and 69 patients of 4 articles reported the results of autograft. The mean Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies score of 3 comparative studies and 9 case series were 17.3 ± 0.6 (72.1% of total score) and 10.6 ± 0.9 (66.3% of total score), respectively. Both allograft group and autograft group had a tendency of improvement in range of motion, and patients-reported clinical outcomes. Total graft retear rate was reported in 20 of 214 (9.3%) patients from 6 articles with a range from 4.3% to 10.5%. Total complication rate was reported in 33 of 299 (11.0%) patients from 12 articles with range from 8.6% to 26.8%. For allograft group and autograft group, the graft retear rate was 13 of 169 (7.7%) from 4 articles and 3 of 45 (6.7%) from 2 articles, respectively. The complication rate was 27 of 230 (11.7%) from 8 articles in allograft group and 6 of 69 (8.7%) from 4 articles in auto graft group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LTT may lead to significant improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, regardless of whether allograft or autograft is used for interpositional grafts. Although the graft retear rate was slightly higher in the allograft group, the difference of graft retear rate between allograft and autograft was not significant. However, other complications, and reoperations were higher in allograft group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145467940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Acromiohumeral center edge angle for predicting degenerative rotator cuff tear in aging patients: a retrospective study","authors":"Nithi Pakmanee MD ,&nbsp;Nuttawut Chanalithichai MD ,&nbsp;Siravich Suvithayasiri MD ,&nbsp;Tanadul Jarrusrojwuttikul MD ,&nbsp;Sasikarn Wanitchakorn MD ,&nbsp;Sittan Aimprasittichai MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100590","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100590","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The etiology of degenerative rotator cuff tears (DRCTs) is unclear, although certain distinct acromion morphologies may correlate with degenerative processes. Numerous radiographic measurements attempting to describe acromion morphology have been described previously. This study aimed to validate and study the relationship between the acromiohumeral center edge angle (ACEA) and DRCTs. We also aimed to compare the predictive value of ACEA to more widely studied parameters, including acromion index (AI), lateral acromion angle (LAA), and critical shoulder angle (CSA). We hypothesize that ACEA is a valid and reliable method for predicting DRCTs. Patients who have higher ACEA are more likely to experience DRCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of 204 shoulder radiographs obtained from patients aged ≥ 40 years. The study population was divided into 2 groups based on rotator cuff status as identified by magnetic resonance imaging. We compared various radiologic parameters in 108 patients with partial and full-thickness DRCTs to 96 patients with intact rotator cuffs. Two independent authors measured the ACEA, AI, LAA, and CSA values on a standardized anteroposterior shoulder radiograph.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean ACEA was significantly higher in the DRCT group than in the intact group (33.11° vs. 24.56°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The ACEA has excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99). The cutoff value was determined to be &gt; 29.88° (sensitivity, 0.69; specificity, 0.78). ACEA had the best predictive value (area under the curve: 0.76) and reliability compared with AI, LAA, and CSA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study shows that ACEA is an effective predictor of DRCTs. Patients with an ACEA &gt; 29.88° on plain radiography were more likely to have DRCTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145466809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outpatient total elbow arthroplasty—outcomes and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Vishwajeet Singh MBBS, MRCS ,&nbsp;Naadir Nazar MBChB, BSc, PGCertMEd ,&nbsp;Lowilius Wiyono MD ,&nbsp;Axler Jean Paul MD ,&nbsp;Joideep Phadnis MD, FRCS (Tr&Orth)","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100592","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100592","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a surgical procedure used in the management of arthritis and fractures. Outpatient total elbow arthroplasty (OTEA) could be a valid option to reduce workforce burden and cost, provided it can be proven to be equally safe and effective as inpatient TEA. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OTEA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar using DistillerSR, with predetermined keywords based on the Patient/Problem, Intervention, Control, and Outcome criteria. Studies characterizing OTEA and/or inpatient TEA were included. Total readmissions, revision rates, cost difference, and functional outcome scores were assessed for outpatient vs. inpatient TEA. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seven hundred twenty-five patients in the outpatient group and 1,461 patients in the inpatient group (control). Incidence of complications was significantly higher in the inpatient cohort compared to the outpatient TEAs (inpatient n = 121 (%) vs. outpatient n = 51 (%), <em>P</em> = .037) Readmissions occurred in 84/1,166 cases (7%). There was no significant difference in the readmission rate between the inpatient (57/745, 7%) and the outpatient (27/421, 6%). The cost of OTEA was lower than inpatient TEA, with a mean of 26, 817 USD in the inpatient group when compared to 18,412 USD for OTEA.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Clinical results of outpatient vs. inpatient TEA were similar with respect to overall complications, readmissions, and functional scores, and outpatient TEA was more cost effective. Our review indicates that outpatient TEA can be considered by individual care providers after development of appropriate local pathways. This review highlights the need for further high-quality studies in this niche but clinically important field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145520576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}