首页 > 最新文献

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Image-guided versus landmark-guided suprascapular nerve block for shoulder pain in rotator cuff tears: a systematic review 图像引导与地标引导肩胛上神经阻滞治疗肩袖撕裂后肩痛:系统回顾
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.002
Andrew Kailin Zhou MB, BChir, MA (Cantab), MRCS (Eng) , Dave Osinachukwu Duru BA Hons (Cantab) , Saroop Nandra iBSc, MBBS, MRCS (Eng) , Andrew Metcalfe MBChB, BMedSc, PhD, FRCS (Tr&Orth) , Salma Chaudhury MB, BChir, MA (Cantab), PhD (Oxon), FRCS (Orth)

Background

Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a recognized treatment for chronic shoulder pain, including pain from rotator cuff tears. While it is purported that image-guided SSNB improve injection accuracy over landmark-guided techniques, the impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review compared image-guided vs. landmark-guided SSNB in patients with rotator cuff tears, evaluating efficacy, pain relief, functional improvement, complications, and duration of relief.

Methods

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL (inception to April 2025) for prospective or retrospective studies comparing image-guided (ultrasound, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, or arthroscopic) to landmark-guided SSNB. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Data on pain outcomes, functional scores, complications, and duration of pain relief were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed for each study.

Results

Thirty studies were included, comprising 25 randomized controlled trials, 2 nonrandomized prospective studies, and 3 retrospective studies, totaling 2,205 patients. Both image-guided and landmark-guided techniques significantly reduced pain and improved shoulder function, with pain reduction typically ranging from 3.2 to 5.5 points on a 0-10 visual analog scale at 48 hours postoperatively. There was no consistent evidence indicating superior clinical outcomes with image-guided techniques in terms of pain relief, functional improvement, complication rates, or duration of analgesia.

Conclusion

Both image-guided and landmark-guided SSNB techniques provide effective pain relief and functional improvement in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Despite potential procedural advantages of image guidance, such as reduced needle repositioning and higher first-attempt success rates, these benefits did not translate into consistently superior clinical outcomes. This systematic review suggests landmark-guided SSNB offer similar outcomes to image-guided techniques, with implications for resource and expertise availability.
肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)是一种公认的治疗慢性肩痛的方法,包括肩袖撕裂引起的疼痛。虽然据称图像引导的SSNB比地标引导技术提高了注射精度,但对临床结果的影响尚不清楚。本系统综述比较了图像引导与地标引导SSNB治疗肩袖撕裂患者的疗效、疼痛缓解、功能改善、并发症和缓解持续时间。方法:我们检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Embase和CINAHL(成立至2025年4月),以比较图像引导(超声、透视、计算机断层扫描或关节镜)和地标引导SSNB的前瞻性或回顾性研究。两位审稿人独立筛选标题/摘要和全文,通过协商一致解决差异。提取疼痛结局、功能评分、并发症和疼痛缓解持续时间的数据。对每项研究的偏倚风险进行评估。结果纳入30项研究,包括25项随机对照试验、2项非随机前瞻性研究和3项回顾性研究,共计2205例患者。图像引导和地标引导技术均可显著减轻疼痛并改善肩功能,术后48小时疼痛减轻程度通常在0-10视觉模拟评分3.2 - 5.5分之间。没有一致的证据表明图像引导技术在疼痛缓解、功能改善、并发症发生率或镇痛持续时间方面具有优越的临床结果。结论图像引导和地标引导下的SSNB技术对肩袖相关性肩痛患者均能有效缓解疼痛和改善功能。尽管图像引导具有潜在的手术优势,如减少针头重新定位和更高的首次尝试成功率,但这些优势并没有转化为一贯优越的临床结果。这一系统综述表明,地标引导的SSNB提供了与图像引导技术相似的结果,对资源和专业知识的可用性有影响。
{"title":"Image-guided versus landmark-guided suprascapular nerve block for shoulder pain in rotator cuff tears: a systematic review","authors":"Andrew Kailin Zhou MB, BChir, MA (Cantab), MRCS (Eng) ,&nbsp;Dave Osinachukwu Duru BA Hons (Cantab) ,&nbsp;Saroop Nandra iBSc, MBBS, MRCS (Eng) ,&nbsp;Andrew Metcalfe MBChB, BMedSc, PhD, FRCS (Tr&Orth) ,&nbsp;Salma Chaudhury MB, BChir, MA (Cantab), PhD (Oxon), FRCS (Orth)","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a recognized treatment for chronic shoulder pain, including pain from rotator cuff tears. While it is purported that image-guided SSNB improve injection accuracy over landmark-guided techniques, the impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review compared image-guided vs. landmark-guided SSNB in patients with rotator cuff tears, evaluating efficacy, pain relief, functional improvement, complications, and duration of relief.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL (inception to April 2025) for prospective or retrospective studies comparing image-guided (ultrasound, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, or arthroscopic) to landmark-guided SSNB. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Data on pain outcomes, functional scores, complications, and duration of pain relief were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed for each study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty studies were included, comprising 25 randomized controlled trials, 2 nonrandomized prospective studies, and 3 retrospective studies, totaling 2,205 patients. Both image-guided and landmark-guided techniques significantly reduced pain and improved shoulder function, with pain reduction typically ranging from 3.2 to 5.5 points on a 0-10 visual analog scale at 48 hours postoperatively. There was no consistent evidence indicating superior clinical outcomes with image-guided techniques in terms of pain relief, functional improvement, complication rates, or duration of analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both image-guided and landmark-guided SSNB techniques provide effective pain relief and functional improvement in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Despite potential procedural advantages of image guidance, such as reduced needle repositioning and higher first-attempt success rates, these benefits did not translate into consistently superior clinical outcomes. This systematic review suggests landmark-guided SSNB offer similar outcomes to image-guided techniques, with implications for resource and expertise availability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145290077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The cruciate double rip-stop technique: an all-suture distal triceps tendon repair technique combining a pulley mechanism and racking hitch knots 十字双撕裂停止技术:一种全缝合的三头肌腱远端修复技术,结合滑轮机构和拉结结
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100595
Christian S. Rosenow MD , Parag Raval MBBS BSc (Hons), MRCS (Eng) FRCS (Tr & Orth) , Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD , Mark E. Morrey MD, MS
{"title":"The cruciate double rip-stop technique: an all-suture distal triceps tendon repair technique combining a pulley mechanism and racking hitch knots","authors":"Christian S. Rosenow MD ,&nbsp;Parag Raval MBBS BSc (Hons), MRCS (Eng) FRCS (Tr & Orth) ,&nbsp;Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Morrey MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100595","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100595","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dynamic assessment of deltoid stiffness using shear wave elastography: a reliability study in healthy adults 用横波弹性图动态评估三角肌刚度:一项健康成人的可靠性研究
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.018
Jesse Seilern und Aspang MD, Frank L. Vazquez BSAT, Joanne Y. Zhou MD, Jaden Hardrick BS, Zaamin B. Hussain MD, EdM, Sarah M. Taub PA-C, Brittany R. Arnold NP, Michael B. Gottschalk MD, Eric R. Wagner MD, MS, FAAOS, CAQ

Background

Deltoid tension plays an important role in maintaining shoulder function. Understanding normative values is essential for accurately restoring deltoid mechanics in pathological conditions; however, there is a notable lack of data on this topic, particularly with respect to objective measurement methods. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound-based imaging modality that provides real-time quantitative assessment of muscle stiffness. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of SWE for measuring deltoid stiffness in different shoulder positions.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 21 healthy volunteers without shoulder pathology (8 males and 13 females; mean age 30.6 ± 5.6 years). Twelve SWE measurements of the middle deltoid were obtained for each side (left/right) and shoulder position (resting at side and 90° abduction) using a standardized measurement technique. Measurements were performed by 4 independent operators with varying levels of training and experience in ultrasound measurement (2 expert and 2 novice operators). Intraoperator and interoperator reliability were assessed using the median values for each measuring position, side, and measurer. Validity was assessed using Student's t-tests for resting vs. abducted positions, while reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and paired t-tests for side-to-side consistency.

Results

The mean SWE values were 48.37 kilopascals (kPa) (left) and 47.64 kPa (right) at rest, and 158.48 kPa (left) and 155.45 kPa (right) in abduction. Tension was significantly higher in abduction compared to rest (156.97 kPa vs 48.01 kPa, P < .001), confirming construct validity by demonstrating SWE's ability to differentiate muscle stiffness across functional states. Interoperator reliability was good (ICC 0.79), and intraoperator reliability was also good (ICC >0.78). Reliability was also good between the 2 expert operators (ICC 0.878) and the 2 novice operators (0.797), as well as between expert and novice groups (ICC 0.762), indicating reliable measurements across experience levels. No significant difference was found between left and right measurements (P = .656).

Conclusion

SWE is a reliable and valid method for quantifying deltoid muscle stiffness across functional states. Its reproducibility across operator experience levels and sensitivity to dynamic changes support its potential clinical utility in perioperative assessment and rehabilitation of shoulder conditions.
背景:三角肌张力在维持肩部功能方面起着重要作用。理解规范值对于在病理条件下准确恢复三角肌力学至关重要;然而,关于这一主题的数据明显缺乏,特别是关于客观测量方法的数据。剪切波弹性成像(SWE)是一种基于超声的成像方式,可以实时定量评估肌肉僵硬度。本研究评估SWE测量不同肩位三角肌刚度的信度和效度。方法对21例无肩部病变的健康志愿者进行横断面研究,其中男性8例,女性13例,平均年龄30.6±5.6岁。采用标准化测量技术,对中三角肌的每侧(左/右)和肩位(侧卧和90°外展)进行了12次SWE测量。测量由4名独立操作员进行,他们具有不同程度的超声测量培训和经验(2名专家和2名新手操作员)。使用每个测量位置、侧面和测量器的中位数来评估操作者内部和操作者之间的可靠性。效度采用学生t检验来评估静止位置和外展位置,而信度采用类内相关系数(ICCs)和配对t检验来评估侧对侧一致性。结果静止时平均SWE值为48.37千帕(kPa)(左)和47.64千帕(右),外展时平均SWE值为158.48千帕(左)和155.45千帕(右)。与休息相比,外展时的张力明显更高(156.97 kPa vs 48.01 kPa, P < .001),通过证明SWE在不同功能状态下区分肌肉僵硬的能力,证实了结构的有效性。操作人员之间的可靠性良好(ICC 0.79),操作人员内部的可靠性也很好(ICC >0.78)。2名专家操作员(ICC 0.878)和2名新手操作员(0.797)之间以及专家和新手组之间(ICC 0.762)的可靠性也很好,表明跨经验水平的可靠测量。左、右测量无显著差异(P = .656)。结论swe是一种可靠、有效的三角肌僵硬度定量方法。其可重复性跨越操作者经验水平和对动态变化的敏感性,支持其在围手术期评估和肩部状况康复方面的潜在临床应用。
{"title":"Dynamic assessment of deltoid stiffness using shear wave elastography: a reliability study in healthy adults","authors":"Jesse Seilern und Aspang MD,&nbsp;Frank L. Vazquez BSAT,&nbsp;Joanne Y. Zhou MD,&nbsp;Jaden Hardrick BS,&nbsp;Zaamin B. Hussain MD, EdM,&nbsp;Sarah M. Taub PA-C,&nbsp;Brittany R. Arnold NP,&nbsp;Michael B. Gottschalk MD,&nbsp;Eric R. Wagner MD, MS, FAAOS, CAQ","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deltoid tension plays an important role in maintaining shoulder function. Understanding normative values is essential for accurately restoring deltoid mechanics in pathological conditions; however, there is a notable lack of data on this topic, particularly with respect to objective measurement methods. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound-based imaging modality that provides real-time quantitative assessment of muscle stiffness. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of SWE for measuring deltoid stiffness in different shoulder positions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 21 healthy volunteers without shoulder pathology (8 males and 13 females; mean age 30.6 ± 5.6 years). Twelve SWE measurements of the middle deltoid were obtained for each side (left/right) and shoulder position (resting at side and 90° abduction) using a standardized measurement technique. Measurements were performed by 4 independent operators with varying levels of training and experience in ultrasound measurement (2 expert and 2 novice operators). Intraoperator and interoperator reliability were assessed using the median values for each measuring position, side, and measurer. Validity was assessed using Student's t-tests for resting vs. abducted positions, while reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and paired t-tests for side-to-side consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean SWE values were 48.37 kilopascals (kPa) (left) and 47.64 kPa (right) at rest, and 158.48 kPa (left) and 155.45 kPa (right) in abduction. Tension was significantly higher in abduction compared to rest (156.97 kPa vs 48.01 kPa, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), confirming construct validity by demonstrating SWE's ability to differentiate muscle stiffness across functional states. Interoperator reliability was good (ICC 0.79), and intraoperator reliability was also good (ICC &gt;0.78). Reliability was also good between the 2 expert operators (ICC 0.878) and the 2 novice operators (0.797), as well as between expert and novice groups (ICC 0.762), indicating reliable measurements across experience levels. No significant difference was found between left and right measurements (<em>P</em> = .656).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SWE is a reliable and valid method for quantifying deltoid muscle stiffness across functional states. Its reproducibility across operator experience levels and sensitivity to dynamic changes support its potential clinical utility in perioperative assessment and rehabilitation of shoulder conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145418610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pedicled pectoralis major transfer for restoration of nonparalytic deltoid deficiency: a technical note 带蒂胸大肌转移恢复非麻痹性三角肌缺陷:技术说明
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.005
Chang Hee Baek MD, Bo Taek Kim MD, Jung Gon Kim MD, Chaemoon Lim MD
{"title":"Pedicled pectoralis major transfer for restoration of nonparalytic deltoid deficiency: a technical note","authors":"Chang Hee Baek MD,&nbsp;Bo Taek Kim MD,&nbsp;Jung Gon Kim MD,&nbsp;Chaemoon Lim MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of social deprivation on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes 社会剥夺对反向全肩关节置换术结果的影响
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100589
Kelly E. Jacoby BS, Logan M. Andryk MD, Andrew Valiquette MD, Matthew Van Boxtel MD, Evan Cox BA, Steven I. Grindel MD , Alexander Graf MD

Background

Social deprivation has previously been shown to have a negative correlation with patients' overall health. In addition, higher levels of social deprivation have been shown to be correlated with poor postoperative outcomes following orthopedic procedures and health-care–related quality of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a patient's level of social deprivation level, as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), affects patients with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and their experience with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

Methods

A retrospective review, with an evidence level of 3, composed of 119 patients (133 shoulders) with primary RCA who underwent rTSA by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2005-2020. Social deprivation was determined using the patient's ADI score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scores, Constant–Murley Scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were recorded for each patient. Patients were grouped into terciles based on their level of social deprivation and comparisons were made between the groups. Analysis of variance and student t-testing were used to determine statistically significant differences between the groups.

Results

Significant functional improvements were observed following rTSA for patients with RCA. Preoperatively, patients from the most deprived group showed lower average Simple Shoulder Test scores (1.62 vs. 3.04, P = .026), while postoperatively, these patients showed lower external rotation with their arm at the side (33° vs. 42°, P = .044). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in pain or functional outcomes between the ADI groups preoperatively or postoperatively. Notching and postoperative complication rates were also not statistically different between the 3 groups (P = .886 and P = .697, respectively).

Conclusion

rTSA is a safe and effective procedure for patients from all levels of social deprivation, and patients can experience similar postoperative shoulder pain and function regardless of their socioeconomic status.
社会剥夺已经被证明与病人的整体健康呈负相关。此外,较高程度的社会剥夺已被证明与骨科手术后不良的术后结果和与医疗保健相关的生活质量相关。本研究的目的是评估患者的社会剥夺水平(由面积剥夺指数(ADI)测量)如何影响肩袖病(RCA)患者及其逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的经历。方法回顾性研究,证据水平为3,包括2005-2020年在单一机构由同一名外科医生接受rTSA的119例原发性RCA患者(133肩)。使用患者的ADI评分来确定社会剥夺。记录每位患者的术前和术后活动范围、视觉模拟量表评分、美国肩关节外科医生评分、Constant-Murley评分和简单肩关节测试评分。病人根据他们的社会剥夺程度被分成不同的组,并在组间进行比较。使用方差分析和学生t检验来确定组间具有统计学意义的差异。结果rTSA对RCA患者的功能有显著改善。术前,最剥夺组患者单纯性肩部测试平均得分较低(1.62比3.04,P = 0.026),而术后,这些患者手臂侧侧的外旋度较低(33°比42°,P = 0.044)。此外,ADI组术前或术后疼痛或功能结局无显著差异。三组间切口率和术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.886、P = 0.697)。结论rtsa是一种安全有效的手术,适用于所有社会剥夺程度的患者,无论其社会经济地位如何,术后患者均可经历相似的肩部疼痛和功能。
{"title":"The impact of social deprivation on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes","authors":"Kelly E. Jacoby BS,&nbsp;Logan M. Andryk MD,&nbsp;Andrew Valiquette MD,&nbsp;Matthew Van Boxtel MD,&nbsp;Evan Cox BA,&nbsp;Steven I. Grindel MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Graf MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100589","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100589","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Social deprivation has previously been shown to have a negative correlation with patients' overall health. In addition, higher levels of social deprivation have been shown to be correlated with poor postoperative outcomes following orthopedic procedures and health-care–related quality of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a patient's level of social deprivation level, as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), affects patients with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and their experience with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review, with an evidence level of 3, composed of 119 patients (133 shoulders) with primary RCA who underwent rTSA by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2005-2020. Social deprivation was determined using the patient's ADI score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scores, Constant–Murley Scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were recorded for each patient. Patients were grouped into terciles based on their level of social deprivation and comparisons were made between the groups. Analysis of variance and student t-testing were used to determine statistically significant differences between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant functional improvements were observed following rTSA for patients with RCA. Preoperatively, patients from the most deprived group showed lower average Simple Shoulder Test scores (1.62 vs. 3.04, <em>P</em> = .026), while postoperatively, these patients showed lower external rotation with their arm at the side (33° vs. 42°, <em>P</em> = .044). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in pain or functional outcomes between the ADI groups preoperatively or postoperatively. Notching and postoperative complication rates were also not statistically different between the 3 groups (<em>P</em> = .886 and <em>P</em> = .697, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>rTSA is a safe and effective procedure for patients from all levels of social deprivation, and patients can experience similar postoperative shoulder pain and function regardless of their socioeconomic status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145467939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital and virtual reality–based rehabilitation versus conventional therapy for rotator cuff tears and post-repair recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis 基于数字和虚拟现实的康复与传统治疗肩袖撕裂和修复后恢复:系统回顾和荟萃分析
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.003
Abdullah M. AlHossan MD , Rana H. Jahhaf MBBS , Abdulrazzag S. Alharbi MBBS , Leena M. Alqahtani MBBS , Renad M. Alshahrani MBBS , Leen T. Alowaidah MBBS , Hind Y. Alshangiti MBBS , Ryan M. Degen MD, FRCS

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality-based rehabilitation compared to conventional rehabilitation methods in improving shoulder functions, range of motion (ROM), strength, and pain relief in patients recovering from rotator cuff repair. To assess the impact of virtual reality–based rehabilitation on rehabilitation adherence and patient satisfaction in postoperative rotator cuff repair recovery.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Dimensions AI, and Google Scholar was performed from inception to February 14, 2025. Studies involving patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and comparing virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation with standard physical therapy were included. Data were extracted and synthesized. Meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported by multiple studies, and risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.

Results

Of 599 screened records, 6 studies (n ≈ 332 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between VR-based and conventional rehabilitation in reducing perceived pain and improving patient-reported functional outcomes. Importantly, VR-based therapy led to significantly greater improvement in shoulder abduction ROM than conventional rehabilitation. However, gains in shoulder flexion and external rotation were not significantly different between groups. Patient adherence and satisfaction varied with rehabilitation modality: home-based digital programs tended to improve adherence, while satisfaction depended on individual preferences for supervision.

Conclusion

VR-based rehabilitation is a feasible alternative or adjunct to traditional physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair. It yields postoperative outcomes (pain relief, functional improvement, and strength recovery) comparable to standard rehabilitation, with a clear advantage in enhancing shoulder abduction ROM. Digital rehabilitation may improve patient compliance through greater engagement and accessibility, although integration of periodic clinician interaction may be necessary to maximize patient satisfaction. These findings support incorporating digital health technology into postoperative shoulder rehab protocols, tailored to individual patient needs.
评估基于虚拟现实的康复与传统康复方法在改善肩袖修复术后患者肩功能、活动范围(ROM)、力量和疼痛缓解方面的有效性。评估基于虚拟现实的康复对肩袖修复术后康复依从性和患者满意度的影响。方法系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Dimensions AI、b谷歌Scholar自建站至2025年2月14日的文献。研究包括接受肩袖修复的患者,并将基于虚拟现实(VR)的康复与标准物理治疗进行比较。提取并合成数据。对多项研究报告的结果进行荟萃分析,并使用Cochrane risk of bias 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。结果599例筛选记录中,6项研究(n≈332例)符合纳入标准。基于虚拟现实的康复和传统康复在减轻感知疼痛和改善患者报告的功能结局方面没有统计学上的显著差异。重要的是,与传统康复相比,基于vr的治疗可显著改善肩外展ROM。然而,肩关节屈曲和外旋的增加在两组之间没有显著差异。患者的依从性和满意度因康复模式而异:基于家庭的数字方案倾向于提高依从性,而满意度取决于个人对监督的偏好。结论基于vr的康复治疗是肩袖修复后传统物理治疗的一种可行的替代或辅助方法。其术后效果(疼痛缓解、功能改善和力量恢复)与标准康复相当,在增强肩外展ROM方面具有明显优势。数字康复可以通过更大的参与和可及性来提高患者的依从性,尽管为了最大限度地提高患者满意度,可能需要整合临床医生的定期互动。这些发现支持将数字健康技术纳入术后肩部康复方案,以满足患者的个性化需求。
{"title":"Digital and virtual reality–based rehabilitation versus conventional therapy for rotator cuff tears and post-repair recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Abdullah M. AlHossan MD ,&nbsp;Rana H. Jahhaf MBBS ,&nbsp;Abdulrazzag S. Alharbi MBBS ,&nbsp;Leena M. Alqahtani MBBS ,&nbsp;Renad M. Alshahrani MBBS ,&nbsp;Leen T. Alowaidah MBBS ,&nbsp;Hind Y. Alshangiti MBBS ,&nbsp;Ryan M. Degen MD, FRCS","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality-based rehabilitation compared to conventional rehabilitation methods in improving shoulder functions, range of motion (ROM), strength, and pain relief in patients recovering from rotator cuff repair. To assess the impact of virtual reality–based rehabilitation on rehabilitation adherence and patient satisfaction in postoperative rotator cuff repair recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Dimensions AI, and Google Scholar was performed from inception to February 14, 2025. Studies involving patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and comparing virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation with standard physical therapy were included. Data were extracted and synthesized. Meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported by multiple studies, and risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 599 screened records, 6 studies (n ≈ 332 patients) met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between VR-based and conventional rehabilitation in reducing perceived pain and improving patient-reported functional outcomes. Importantly, VR-based therapy led to significantly greater improvement in shoulder abduction ROM than conventional rehabilitation. However, gains in shoulder flexion and external rotation were not significantly different between groups. Patient adherence and satisfaction varied with rehabilitation modality: home-based digital programs tended to improve adherence, while satisfaction depended on individual preferences for supervision.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>VR-based rehabilitation is a feasible alternative or adjunct to traditional physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair. It yields postoperative outcomes (pain relief, functional improvement, and strength recovery) comparable to standard rehabilitation, with a clear advantage in enhancing shoulder abduction ROM. Digital rehabilitation may improve patient compliance through greater engagement and accessibility, although integration of periodic clinician interaction may be necessary to maximize patient satisfaction. These findings support incorporating digital health technology into postoperative shoulder rehab protocols, tailored to individual patient needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145323138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the surgical outcomes transitioning from a traditional grammont-style valgus-medialized reverse shoulder arthroplasty to a varus lateralized reverse shoulder implant 探讨从传统的外翻型反肩关节置换术到外翻侧翻型反肩关节置换术的手术效果
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100617
Jason Howard BS , Thomas Stanila BS , Samuel E. Mircoff BS , Andrew L. Chen MD , Hassan Farooq MD , Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has undergone significant evolution since its inception, particularly in implant design and surgical techniques. One implant design that has changed dramatically over the years is the humeral neck–shaft angle (NSA), which has seen a shift toward a smaller angle since the original Grammont design. This study aims to compare pain and functional outcomes during the transition period from valgus to varus humeral stem implants in rTSA, as well as provide commentary on the technical challenges encountered.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on the last 50 patients who underwent rTSA with a traditional Grammont style 150° NSA implant and the first 50 patients with a 135° NSA implant by a single surgeon between January 2019 and December 2022. This study aims to investigate the transition between implant systems by assessing patient outcomes including active forward flexion, active external rotation (AER), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complication rates such as readmissions and revisions at various postoperative time points. Statistical analyses employed linear mixed-effects models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates.

Results

The study analyzed 100 patients, the last 50 patients who underwent Grammont Style medialized valgus (150° NSA) rTSA to the first 50 patients implanted with a lateralized varus (135° NSA) rTSA, with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Compared to the medialized valgus implant, patients with the lateralized varus implant demonstrated significantly greater AER starting at 2 months (8° difference, P = .032) and persisting at 1 year (8° difference, P = .032). Otherwise, VAS pain scores, ASES scores, and complications rates did not differ significantly at any time point between implant types.

Conclusions

While initial postoperative improvements in AER favors the 135° NSA system compared to the 150° NSA system, both implant types yielded comparable outcomes in range of motion, VAS pain, ASES scores, and complications. In spite of this, there are multiple technical points and important differences between the 2 design philosophies that are consequential for surgeons to personalize patient treatment plans, minimize complications, optimize shoulder biomechanics, and refine outcomes.
反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)自诞生以来经历了重大的发展,特别是在植入物设计和手术技术方面。多年来,肱骨颈轴角(NSA)的设计发生了巨大的变化,与最初的格拉蒙设计相比,它已经向更小的角度转变。本研究旨在比较rTSA从外翻到内翻肱骨干植入物过渡期间的疼痛和功能结果,并对遇到的技术挑战提供评论。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月由同一位外科医生行传统格拉蒙式150°NSA种植体rTSA的后50例患者和行135°NSA种植体rTSA的前50例患者。本研究旨在通过评估患者的预后,包括主动前屈、主动外旋(AER)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分,以及术后不同时间点的并发症发生率(如再入院和修复),来研究植入系统之间的过渡。统计分析采用线性混合效应模型,调整了人口统计学和临床协变量。结果本研究分析了100例患者,其中后50例患者行格拉蒙式中翻(150°NSA) rTSA,前50例患者行侧翻(135°NSA) rTSA,平均随访2.6年。与中向内翻种植体相比,侧翻种植体患者在2个月(8°差异,P = 0.032)和持续1年(8°差异,P = 0.032)时表现出更大的AER。另外,不同种植体类型的VAS疼痛评分、as评分和并发症发生率在任何时间点均无显著差异。结论:虽然与150°NSA系统相比,135°NSA系统在AER术后的初步改善更有利,但两种种植体在活动范围、VAS疼痛、as评分和并发症方面的结果相当。尽管如此,这两种设计理念之间存在许多技术要点和重要差异,这对外科医生个性化患者治疗计划、减少并发症、优化肩部生物力学和改善预后具有重要意义。
{"title":"Investigating the surgical outcomes transitioning from a traditional grammont-style valgus-medialized reverse shoulder arthroplasty to a varus lateralized reverse shoulder implant","authors":"Jason Howard BS ,&nbsp;Thomas Stanila BS ,&nbsp;Samuel E. Mircoff BS ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Hassan Farooq MD ,&nbsp;Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100617","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100617","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has undergone significant evolution since its inception, particularly in implant design and surgical techniques. One implant design that has changed dramatically over the years is the humeral neck–shaft angle (NSA), which has seen a shift toward a smaller angle since the original Grammont design. This study aims to compare pain and functional outcomes during the transition period from valgus to varus humeral stem implants in rTSA, as well as provide commentary on the technical challenges encountered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted on the last 50 patients who underwent rTSA with a traditional Grammont style 150° NSA implant and the first 50 patients with a 135° NSA implant by a single surgeon between January 2019 and December 2022. This study aims to investigate the transition between implant systems by assessing patient outcomes including active forward flexion, active external rotation (AER), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complication rates such as readmissions and revisions at various postoperative time points. Statistical analyses employed linear mixed-effects models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study analyzed 100 patients, the last 50 patients who underwent Grammont Style medialized valgus (150° NSA) rTSA to the first 50 patients implanted with a lateralized varus (135° NSA) rTSA, with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Compared to the medialized valgus implant, patients with the lateralized varus implant demonstrated significantly greater AER starting at 2 months (8° difference, <em>P</em> = .032) and persisting at 1 year (8° difference, <em>P</em> = .032). Otherwise, VAS pain scores, ASES scores, and complications rates did not differ significantly at any time point between implant types.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While initial postoperative improvements in AER favors the 135° NSA system compared to the 150° NSA system, both implant types yielded comparable outcomes in range of motion, VAS pain, ASES scores, and complications. In spite of this, there are multiple technical points and important differences between the 2 design philosophies that are consequential for surgeons to personalize patient treatment plans, minimize complications, optimize shoulder biomechanics, and refine outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epigenetic alterations in rotator cuff tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears: a systematic review 肩袖肌腱病变和退行性肩袖撕裂的表观遗传改变:一项系统综述
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100618
Bret M. Hatzinger BS , Dane R.G. Lind BA , Nicholas A. Felan BA , Benjamin B. Rothrauff MD, PhD , Grant J. Dornan MS , Johnny Huard PhD , Peter J. Millett MD, MSc

Background

Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears are common, disabling conditions with a complex molecular etiology. Furthermore, RC pathology becomes increasingly common with age, especially in the case of supraspinatus tendon injury. Concurrent with increased RC pathology during aging are epigenetic alterations, which makes the relationship between RC pathology and epigenetic alterations an area of interest. The role of epigenetics in RC pathology is still being elucidated but has potential to provide diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We aimed to systematically review the altered epigenetic signatures and mechanisms underlying RC pathology.

Methods

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) were searched 27 August, 2024, for primary studies reporting on epigenetic alterations (DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs) in RC tendinopathy and associated atraumatic cuff tear tissue. Risk of bias and methodological quality of all included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results

Of the 1,190 identified references, 39 studies were included, totaling 464 human and 641 animal model participant shoulders. We identified altered expression of 87 microRNAs, 24 of which were reported on in multiple studies, 62 long noncoding RNAs, 26 circular RNAs, 9 histone modifications or histone-modifying enzymes, and 11 genes exhibiting altered DNA methylation within the disease state. Epigenetic signatures were most commonly associated with inflammation, extracellular matrix degeneration, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration. We also report on 15 studies characterizing epigenetic therapeutics (5 microRNA, 1 long noncoding RNA, 3 histone-modifying enzymes, and 6 gene silencing RNA).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that epigenetic regulation may play an important role in the pathophysiology of RC tendinopathy and degenerative tear and that there is a high potential for epigenetic biomarkers and therapeutics to aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this condition.
背景:肩袖(RC)肌腱病变和退行性肩袖撕裂是常见的致残性疾病,具有复杂的分子病因。此外,随着年龄的增长,尤其是冈上肌腱损伤的情况下,RC病理变得越来越普遍。随着年龄的增长,RC病理增加的同时是表观遗传改变,这使得RC病理和表观遗传改变之间的关系成为一个感兴趣的领域。表观遗传学在RC病理中的作用仍有待阐明,但有可能提供诊断生物标志物和治疗靶点。我们的目的是系统地回顾改变的表观遗传特征和机制背后的RC病理。方法于2024年8月27日检索四个电子数据库(PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane和b谷歌Scholar),检索关于RC肌腱病变和相关非创伤性袖带撕裂组织的表观遗传改变(DNA甲基化,组蛋白修饰,非编码rna)的初步研究。所有纳入研究的偏倚风险和方法学质量均按照纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。结果在1190篇文献中,纳入了39项研究,共464例人类和641例动物模型参与者肩部。我们发现了87个microrna的表达改变,其中24个在多个研究中被报道,62个长链非编码rna, 26个环状rna, 9个组蛋白修饰或组蛋白修饰酶,以及11个在疾病状态下表现出DNA甲基化改变的基因。表观遗传特征最常与炎症、细胞外基质变性、肌肉萎缩和脂肪浸润有关。我们还报道了15项表征表观遗传治疗的研究(5个microRNA, 1个长链非编码RNA, 3个组蛋白修饰酶和6个基因沉默RNA)。结论表观遗传调控可能在RC肌腱病变和退行性撕裂的病理生理中发挥重要作用,表观遗传生物标志物和治疗方法在RC肌腱病变的诊断、预后和治疗中具有很大的潜力。
{"title":"Epigenetic alterations in rotator cuff tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears: a systematic review","authors":"Bret M. Hatzinger BS ,&nbsp;Dane R.G. Lind BA ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Felan BA ,&nbsp;Benjamin B. Rothrauff MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Grant J. Dornan MS ,&nbsp;Johnny Huard PhD ,&nbsp;Peter J. Millett MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100618","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100618","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears are common, disabling conditions with a complex molecular etiology. Furthermore, RC pathology becomes increasingly common with age, especially in the case of supraspinatus tendon injury. Concurrent with increased RC pathology during aging are epigenetic alterations, which makes the relationship between RC pathology and epigenetic alterations an area of interest. The role of epigenetics in RC pathology is still being elucidated but has potential to provide diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We aimed to systematically review the altered epigenetic signatures and mechanisms underlying RC pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) were searched 27 August, 2024, for primary studies reporting on epigenetic alterations (DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs) in RC tendinopathy and associated atraumatic cuff tear tissue. Risk of bias and methodological quality of all included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1,190 identified references, 39 studies were included, totaling 464 human and 641 animal model participant shoulders. We identified altered expression of 87 microRNAs, 24 of which were reported on in multiple studies, 62 long noncoding RNAs, 26 circular RNAs, 9 histone modifications or histone-modifying enzymes, and 11 genes exhibiting altered DNA methylation within the disease state. Epigenetic signatures were most commonly associated with inflammation, extracellular matrix degeneration, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration. We also report on 15 studies characterizing epigenetic therapeutics (5 microRNA, 1 long noncoding RNA, 3 histone-modifying enzymes, and 6 gene silencing RNA).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate that epigenetic regulation may play an important role in the pathophysiology of RC tendinopathy and degenerative tear and that there is a high potential for epigenetic biomarkers and therapeutics to aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rotator cuff repair and biologic augmentation—what do we know? 肩袖修复和生物隆胸——我们知道些什么?
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100605
Adam J. Tagliero MD , Erick M. Marigi MD , Christopher M. Hart MD , Tristan B. Weir MD , Gavin H. Ward BA , Christopher L. Camp MD , Jonathan D. Barlow MD , John W. Sperling MD, MBA , Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD

Background

Despite advancements in rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, failure of tendon healing remains common. In recent years, there has been an increasing body of work assessing the healing environment of the injured rotator cuff and exploring which adjuncts may be suitable to augment repairs.

Methods

In this review, we summarize the best available literature regarding the biology of rotator cuff healing and the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), scaffold-, and graft-based augmentations to RCR to guide the treating clinician.

Results

Proposed treatment modalities range from injection-based augmentation such as PRP and BMAC to scaffold and graft-based augmentations at the time of RCR.

Conclusion

The field of biologic augmentation for RCR is rapidly evolving and has demonstrated substantial potential in improving structural integrity and healing rates. PRP, BMAC, as well as scaffold- or graft-based strategies, have all shown promise; however, variability in study methodology, preparation techniques, and clinical outcomes continue to limit definitive recommendations. Key challenges remain, including the need for optimization and standardization of biologic formulations, patient selection criteria, and cost-effective analyses. The need for well-powered, high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols are paramount to guiding clinical decision-making. The need to optimize RCR is clear, and the interest is evident in the numerous studies in the field. Future studies should aim to establish clear guidelines for biologic augmentation, ensuring that evidence-based applications can optimize patient outcomes in the future.
背景:尽管肩袖修复(RCR)技术取得了进步,但肌腱愈合失败仍然很常见。近年来,有越来越多的工作评估受伤的肩袖愈合环境,并探索哪些辅助物可能适合增加修复。方法在本综述中,我们总结了关于肩袖愈合的生物学和使用富血小板血浆(PRP)、骨髓浓缩物(BMAC)、支架和移植物为基础的RCR增强来指导临床医生的治疗。建议的治疗方式包括注射增强如PRP和BMAC,支架和移植物增强在RCR时。结论RCR生物增强技术正在快速发展,在改善结构完整性和愈合率方面具有巨大的潜力。PRP、BMAC以及基于支架或移植物的策略都显示出了希望;然而,研究方法、制备技术和临床结果的可变性仍然限制了明确的推荐。主要的挑战仍然存在,包括生物制剂的优化和标准化、患者选择标准和成本效益分析的需要。对标准化方案的高质量随机对照试验的需求对指导临床决策至关重要。优化RCR的必要性是明确的,并且在该领域的许多研究中都有明显的兴趣。未来的研究应旨在建立明确的生物增强指南,确保以证据为基础的应用可以在未来优化患者的预后。
{"title":"Rotator cuff repair and biologic augmentation—what do we know?","authors":"Adam J. Tagliero MD ,&nbsp;Erick M. Marigi MD ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Hart MD ,&nbsp;Tristan B. Weir MD ,&nbsp;Gavin H. Ward BA ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Camp MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Barlow MD ,&nbsp;John W. Sperling MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100605","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100605","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite advancements in rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, failure of tendon healing remains common. In recent years, there has been an increasing body of work assessing the healing environment of the injured rotator cuff and exploring which adjuncts may be suitable to augment repairs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this review, we summarize the best available literature regarding the biology of rotator cuff healing and the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), scaffold-, and graft-based augmentations to RCR to guide the treating clinician.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Proposed treatment modalities range from injection-based augmentation such as PRP and BMAC to scaffold and graft-based augmentations at the time of RCR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The field of biologic augmentation for RCR is rapidly evolving and has demonstrated substantial potential in improving structural integrity and healing rates. PRP, BMAC, as well as scaffold- or graft-based strategies, have all shown promise; however, variability in study methodology, preparation techniques, and clinical outcomes continue to limit definitive recommendations. Key challenges remain, including the need for optimization and standardization of biologic formulations, patient selection criteria, and cost-effective analyses. The need for well-powered, high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols are paramount to guiding clinical decision-making. The need to optimize RCR is clear, and the interest is evident in the numerous studies in the field. Future studies should aim to establish clear guidelines for biologic augmentation, ensuring that evidence-based applications can optimize patient outcomes in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes 反向肩关节置换术中钢板固定:术中指导对术后疗效的影响
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100615
Andrea Estfeller , Alp Paksoy MD , Ayham Jaber MD , Yamac Akgün MD , Doruk Akgün MD
In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, precise positioning of the glenoid baseplate is essential for optimizing biomechanics and implant longevity. This narrative review introduces modern guidance modalities (patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and augmented reality intraoperative navigation) and compares available literature on implant alignment accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Although patient-specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation consistently improve alignment with preoperative plans and reduce errors in guide pin and screw placement, short-term measures of strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes are similar to those achieved with conventional freehand methods. However, guided approaches demonstrate a reduction in the risk of complications in the short term. This suggests that the primary clinical advantage of these modern techniques is reducing complications and potentially improving long-term implant outcomes.
在反向全肩关节置换术中,精确定位关节盂底板对于优化生物力学和延长假体使用寿命至关重要。这篇叙述性综述介绍了现代引导模式(患者专用仪器、计算机辅助导航和增强现实术中导航),并比较了关于种植体对准准确性、患者报告的结果和并发症发生率的现有文献。尽管患者专用器械和计算机辅助导航持续改善了术前计划的对齐,减少了导针和螺钉放置的错误,但短期测量强度、活动能力和患者报告的结果与传统徒手方法相似。然而,有指导的入路可在短期内降低并发症的风险。这表明,这些现代技术的主要临床优势是减少并发症和潜在地改善长期种植效果。
{"title":"Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes","authors":"Andrea Estfeller ,&nbsp;Alp Paksoy MD ,&nbsp;Ayham Jaber MD ,&nbsp;Yamac Akgün MD ,&nbsp;Doruk Akgün MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100615","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100615","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, precise positioning of the glenoid baseplate is essential for optimizing biomechanics and implant longevity. This narrative review introduces modern guidance modalities (patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and augmented reality intraoperative navigation) and compares available literature on implant alignment accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Although patient-specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation consistently improve alignment with preoperative plans and reduce errors in guide pin and screw placement, short-term measures of strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes are similar to those achieved with conventional freehand methods. However, guided approaches demonstrate a reduction in the risk of complications in the short term. This suggests that the primary clinical advantage of these modern techniques is reducing complications and potentially improving long-term implant outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145883683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSES reviews, reports, and techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1