JSES reviews, reports, and techniques最新文献

Background

Distal one-third clavicle fractures are frequently unstable and often require surgical fixation due to high rates of nonunion. Many common methods of fixation have high rates of union but are associated with hardware discomfort and need for secondary surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a fixation technique involving arthroscopically assisted open reduction internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via a coracoclavicular (CC) suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series evaluating patients who underwent fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization by a single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon between 2020 and 2022. Demographic and injury-related data were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for signs of radiographic union. Primary outcome measures included fracture union, complications, and need for additional procedures. Patients were also contacted via telephone to obtain American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores.

Results

Six patients were eligible for inclusion in this study with a mean age of 52.8 ± 14.0 and a mean follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1.6-2.7 years). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 86.2 ± 21.8 (range 52-100). There were no postoperative complications, signs of symptomatic hardware, or need for secondary surgery at the final follow-up among this cohort of patients. All patients had achieved and maintained full radiographic union at a mean radiographic follow-up of 5.5 months (range 2.0-12.9 months).

Conclusion

Arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization of distal clavicle fractures demonstrated high union rates while limiting complications or need for secondary hardware removal. Further analysis on a larger scale is recommended to determine long-term outcomes and direct comparison to other surgical techniques.

Background

The anatomic interplay and overlap between the cervical spine and the shoulder constitutes a challenge for shoulder and spine surgeons, as symptoms of spine and shoulder pathologies are often similar and may lead to entity misdiagnosis.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) searches were updated to October 2023 in search of the qualified papers. Boolean Operators were used with a combination of the keywords “spine” OR “neck” And “Shoulder”. Furthermore, reference lists from papers were also searched to find literature.

Results

It is of pivotal importance to conduct comprehensive preoperative clinical investigation to appropriately evaluate and assess the source of the pathology and the leading causes behind it. Certain markers can help guide surgeons towards etiologies, and these include areas of pain and physical exam findings with the arm squeeze test having the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. As for the shoulder, despite its low sensitivity, the Yergason test had the highest specificity for diagnosing subacromial impingement. Local anesthetic injection can help as well in the diagnostic approach. Moreover, the interplay between these anatomic locations is not solely related to preoperative diagnosis. Studies have shown that previous surgery for cervical spine pathology may negatively affect the outcomes of shoulder procedures like arthroplasties.

Conclusion

Shoulder and spine surgeons should be wary and vigilant of accurately diagnosing the etiology of the presenting symptoms to ensure proper management and optimize prognosis.

Background

Previous studies of the cortical suspensory button (CSB) implant have analyzed fixation strength as a function of suture type and surgical technique, but knot configuration remains an area of interest. This study investigates 4-strand knot configurations in CSB suspensory fixation, specifically comparing the use of 2 separate knots with a single knot. We hypothesize that using 2 knots on the distal side of the CSB with #2 suture will yield the strongest and stiffest suspensory fixation.

Methods

Two types of knot configurations were compared: a single knot with all 4 suture strands versus 2 independent knots with 2 suture strands each (1 knot from inner strands and 1 knot from outer strands). They were tested using #2 or 2-0 suture, and at distal (on top of the button) or proximal (underneath the button) knot positions. Mechanical testing on the Instron measured ultimate failure load, elongation at failure, and stiffness. Statistical analyses (Shapiro-Wilk, unpaired Student’s t-tests, and Chi-square tests) assessed differences in strength, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode between knot configurations within each CSB construct combination.

Results

With #2 suture, 2 knots across the CSB resulted in higher load to failure compared to 1 knot in both proximal (467.00 N vs. 554.66 N, P = .026) and distal (395.18 N vs. 526.51 N, P < .001) locations. Furthermore, 2 knots provided higher stiffness than 1 knot in both proximal (53.24 N/mm vs. 67.89 N/mm, P < .001) and distal (47.08 N/mm vs. 56.73 N/mm, P = .041) knot locations. However, using 2-0 suture showed no significant differences in failure load and stiffness regardless of knot location.

Conclusion

Using #2 suture and tying 2 independent knots across the CSB increased load to failure and stiffness compared to using only 1 knot regardless of knot position. Thus, if using #2 suture, it is recommended to tie 2 knots to enhance construct strength. However, with 2-0 suture, the number of knots did not impact construct strength. Therefore, if using 2-0 suture, 1 knot can be used to save time. Knot position did not significantly affect the strength or stiffness of the CSB construct, emphasizing the importance of considering knot prominence and surgical approach for determining knot location.

Background

Both scapular dynamics and static scapular position are important in the treatment of shoulder dysfunction. This study aimed to create an index that can evaluate scapular position on plain radiographs and evaluate the relation between scapular position and posture accurately.

Methods

Using four fresh frozen cadavers, we developed a glenoid angle grade based on the degree of overlap between the shadow of the coracoid inflection point and the upper edge of the scapula on frontal plain radiographs: grade 1, no overlap; grade 2, overlaps by less than half of the shadow; grade 3, overlaps by more than half. We then performed a retrospective cohort study that included 329 shoulders of 329 patients who underwent spine surgery. Spine alignment parameters (SPAPs), including cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis were measured on standing lateral plain radiographs. Glenoid anterior tilt (GAT) and glenoid anteversion angle (GAVA) were calculated on frontal radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography scans. Correlations between SPAPs and each angle were investigated, and independent influencing factors were sought in multivariate analysis. Individual factors, GAT, GAVA, and SPAPs were compared among the grades.

Results

SPAPs associated with GAT were sagittal vertical axis (R = 0.14, P = .011), TK (R = 0.12, P = .026), and LL (R = −0.11, P = .046). Multivariate analysis identified TK and LL as independent influencing factors (TK, P = .001; LL, P = .008). SPAPs associated with GAVA were CL (R = 0.17, P = .002), TK (R = 0.29, P < .001), and LL (R = 0.25, P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified CL, TK, and LL as independent influencing factors (CL, P = .01; TK, P = .03; LL, P = .03). There were 183, 127, and 19 cases categorized as grades 1, 2, and 3. GAT (grade 1, 24.0 ± 7.8; 2, 32.4 ± 7.0; 3, 41.0 ± 7.8), GAVA (1, 29.3 ± 7.6; 2, 33.7 ± 9.5; 3, 31.5 ± 8.3), and TK (1, 30.6 ± 13.6; 2, 35.1 ± 14.2; 3, 43.1 ± 20.4) differed significantly according to grade.

Conclusion

We identified factors that influence scapular position and demonstrated that scapular position can be estimated by a grading system using plain radiographs.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion