首页 > 最新文献

Personality disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types. 临床评定的ICD-11特征域和人格障碍类型。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1037/per0000646
Bastian Lambrecht, Jonatan Simon, Bo Bach

The International Classification of Diseases (11th edition; ICD-11) has adopted a classification of personality disorders (PDs) that abolishes the established International Classification of Diseases (10th edition; ICD-10) PD types in favor of global severity and stylistic trait domain specifiers. The goal of the current study was to describe the empirical relationship between traditional PD types and the ICD-11 trait domains, which is anticipated to inform and guide clinicians in this profound transition. A total of 246 patients were rated by their clinicians. The Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 was used to rate ICD-11 trait domains while PD types were assigned categorically according to ICD-10. Empirical associations were investigated by means of bivariate correlation and logistic regression analyses with bootstrapping. Results overall showed expected and conceptually meaningful associations between ICD-11 trait domains and categorical ICD-10 PD types, with only a few unexpected deviations. Findings suggest that ICD-11 trait domains capture stylistic features of the established PD types in a conceptually coherent manner. These findings may facilitate continuity and guide translation between categorical PD types (i.e., ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [fifth edition]) and the new ICD-11 classification in mental health care. Future research should seek to replicate these findings in various clinical settings while also integrating the essential PD severity classification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

国际疾病分类(第11版);《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)通过了一种人格障碍分类,废除了既定的《国际疾病分类》(第10版);ICD-10) PD类型支持全局严重性和风格特征域说明符。本研究的目的是描述传统PD类型与ICD-11特征域之间的经验关系,预计将在这一深刻转变中为临床医生提供信息和指导。共有246名患者由他们的临床医生打分。使用ICD-11的线人人格量表对ICD-11的特征域进行评分,而根据ICD-10对PD类型进行分类。采用双变量相关和logistic回归分析方法进行实证分析。结果显示ICD-11特征域与分类ICD-10 PD类型之间存在预期的和概念上有意义的关联,只有一些意想不到的偏差。研究结果表明,ICD-11特征域以概念上连贯的方式捕获了已建立的PD类型的风格特征。这些发现可能有助于PD分类类型(即ICD-10和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》[第五版])与新的ICD-11精神卫生保健分类之间的连续性和指导翻译。未来的研究应寻求在不同的临床环境中复制这些发现,同时整合必要的PD严重程度分类。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types.","authors":"Bastian Lambrecht, Jonatan Simon, Bo Bach","doi":"10.1037/per0000646","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>International Classification of Diseases</i> (11th edition; <i>ICD-11</i>) has adopted a classification of personality disorders (PDs) that abolishes the established <i>International Classification of Diseases</i> (10th edition; <i>ICD-10</i>) PD types in favor of global severity and stylistic trait domain specifiers. The goal of the current study was to describe the empirical relationship between traditional PD types and the <i>ICD-11</i> trait domains, which is anticipated to inform and guide clinicians in this profound transition. A total of 246 patients were rated by their clinicians. The Informant-Personality Inventory for <i>ICD-11</i> was used to rate <i>ICD-11</i> trait domains while PD types were assigned categorically according to <i>ICD-10</i>. Empirical associations were investigated by means of bivariate correlation and logistic regression analyses with bootstrapping. Results overall showed expected and conceptually meaningful associations between <i>ICD-11</i> trait domains and categorical <i>ICD-10</i> PD types, with only a few unexpected deviations. Findings suggest that <i>ICD-11</i> trait domains capture stylistic features of the established PD types in a conceptually coherent manner. These findings may facilitate continuity and guide translation between categorical PD types (i.e., <i>ICD-10</i> and <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> [fifth edition]) and the new <i>ICD-11</i> classification in mental health care. Future research should seek to replicate these findings in various clinical settings while also integrating the essential PD severity classification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92158055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of mindfulness and emotion regulation in dialectical behavioral therapy for borderline personality disorder. 正念与情绪调节在边缘型人格障碍辩证行为治疗中的作用。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1037/per0000640
Philippa Hood, Michael Maraun, Shelley F McMain, Janice R Kuo, Alexander L Chapman

Despite nearly 30 years of research demonstrating its effectiveness in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and related problems, few studies have investigated mechanisms of change for dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; Linehan, 1993a). Improvements in mindfulness and emotion regulation have been highlighted as key potential mechanisms of change in DBT (Lynch et al., 2006). The present study examined the time course of and associations between mindfulness, emotion regulation, and BPD symptoms during DBT. Participants were 240 repeatedly and recently self-harming adults (Mage = 27.75) with BPD who were randomly assigned to receive either 6 or 12 months of standard DBT. Primary hypotheses were that: (a) changes in mindfulness would occur before changes in emotion regulation, and (b) changes in emotion regulation would mediate the association of changes in mindfulness with changes in BPD symptoms. Results from changepoint analysis illuminated the proportion of participants for whom first changes occurred in emotion regulation (40.7%), mindfulness (32.4%), or both (26.9%). Contrary to hypotheses, five-wave, cross-lagged analyses did not indicate mediational effects of either mindfulness or emotion regulation on the association of either variable with change in BPD symptoms. Supplemental analyses, however, suggested that changes in emotion regulation mediated the inverse association of changes in mindfulness with changes in BPD symptoms. Findings highlight patterns of change in key, proposed mechanisms of change in DBT and suggest important future research directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管近30年的研究表明其在治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和相关问题方面的有效性,但很少有研究调查辩证行为疗法(DBT)的改变机制;Linehan, 1993)。正念和情绪调节的改善被强调为DBT变化的关键潜在机制(Lynch et al., 2006)。本研究考察了DBT中正念、情绪调节和BPD症状之间的时间过程和联系。参与者是240名经常和最近有自残行为的成年BPD患者(Mage = 27.75),他们被随机分配接受6个月或12个月的标准DBT。主要假设:(a)正念变化发生在情绪调节变化之前;(b)情绪调节变化介导正念变化与BPD症状变化之间的关联。变化点分析的结果阐明了首先发生情绪调节(40.7%)、正念(32.4%)或两者兼而有之(26.9%)的参与者比例。与假设相反,五波交叉滞后分析并未显示正念或情绪调节对任何变量与BPD症状变化的关联的中介作用。然而,补充分析表明,情绪调节的变化介导了正念变化与BPD症状变化的负相关。研究结果强调了关键的变化模式,提出了DBT变化的机制,并提出了未来重要的研究方向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The role of mindfulness and emotion regulation in dialectical behavioral therapy for borderline personality disorder.","authors":"Philippa Hood, Michael Maraun, Shelley F McMain, Janice R Kuo, Alexander L Chapman","doi":"10.1037/per0000640","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000640","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite nearly 30 years of research demonstrating its effectiveness in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and related problems, few studies have investigated mechanisms of change for dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; Linehan, 1993a). Improvements in mindfulness and emotion regulation have been highlighted as key potential mechanisms of change in DBT (Lynch et al., 2006). The present study examined the time course of and associations between mindfulness, emotion regulation, and BPD symptoms during DBT. Participants were 240 repeatedly and recently self-harming adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 27.75) with BPD who were randomly assigned to receive either 6 or 12 months of standard DBT. Primary hypotheses were that: (a) changes in mindfulness would occur before changes in emotion regulation, and (b) changes in emotion regulation would mediate the association of changes in mindfulness with changes in BPD symptoms. Results from changepoint analysis illuminated the proportion of participants for whom first changes occurred in emotion regulation (40.7%), mindfulness (32.4%), or both (26.9%). Contrary to hypotheses, five-wave, cross-lagged analyses did not indicate mediational effects of either mindfulness or emotion regulation on the association of either variable with change in BPD symptoms. Supplemental analyses, however, suggested that changes in emotion regulation mediated the inverse association of changes in mindfulness with changes in BPD symptoms. Findings highlight patterns of change in key, proposed mechanisms of change in DBT and suggest important future research directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138500434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological and neural correlates of social affect and cognition in narcissism: A multimethod study of self-reported traits, experiential states, and behavioral and brain indicators. 自恋中社会情感和认知的心理和神经相关性:对自我报告特质、体验状态以及行为和大脑指标的多方法研究。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1037/per0000645
Emanuel Jauk, Charlotte Blum, Malin Hildebrandt, Konrad Lehmann, Lara Maliske, Philipp Kanske

"Lack of empathy" is a diagnostic criterion of narcissism, but the nature of interpersonal functioning in narcissism is still being debated. Both, empathy and narcissism, are multidimensional constructs, and their relation might depend upon contextual factors. We investigated social affect and cognition in narcissism spanning self-reported traits and experiential states (Ecological Momentary Assessment) as well as behavioral and brain indicators (task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging). N = 140 individuals were selected to cover the full dimensional range of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, including their constituent self-regulatory dimensions of agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic narcissism. Grandiose narcissism was associated with lower social affect at almost all analysis levels. The associations can be attributed to antagonistic self-regulatory dynamics, and are associated with lower brain activation during subjective experiencing of social affect in regions of the salience network. Social cognition was habitually lowered but not impaired in antagonistic narcissism. Our findings do not support a general "lack of empathy." (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

"缺乏同理心 "是自恋的诊断标准之一,但自恋中人际功能的性质仍存在争议。移情和自恋都是多维度的概念,它们之间的关系可能取决于环境因素。我们研究了自恋中的社会情感和认知,涵盖了自我报告的特质和体验状态(生态瞬间评估)以及行为和大脑指标(任务相关功能磁共振成像)。研究选取了 N = 140 人,涵盖了自大自恋和脆弱自恋的全部维度范围,包括代理自恋、对抗自恋和神经质自恋等自我调节维度。在几乎所有分析层面上,傲慢自恋都与较低的社会情感相关。这种关联可归因于对抗性自我调节动力,并与主观体验社会情感时突出网络区域较低的大脑激活有关。在对抗性自恋中,社会认知会习惯性地降低,但不会受损。我们的研究结果并不支持普遍的 "缺乏同理心"。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Psychological and neural correlates of social affect and cognition in narcissism: A multimethod study of self-reported traits, experiential states, and behavioral and brain indicators.","authors":"Emanuel Jauk, Charlotte Blum, Malin Hildebrandt, Konrad Lehmann, Lara Maliske, Philipp Kanske","doi":"10.1037/per0000645","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Lack of empathy\" is a diagnostic criterion of narcissism, but the nature of interpersonal functioning in narcissism is still being debated. Both, empathy and narcissism, are multidimensional constructs, and their relation might depend upon contextual factors. We investigated social affect and cognition in narcissism spanning self-reported traits and experiential states (Ecological Momentary Assessment) as well as behavioral and brain indicators (task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging). <i>N</i> = 140 individuals were selected to cover the full dimensional range of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, including their constituent self-regulatory dimensions of agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic narcissism. Grandiose narcissism was associated with lower social affect at almost all analysis levels. The associations can be attributed to antagonistic self-regulatory dynamics, and are associated with lower brain activation during subjective experiencing of social affect in regions of the salience network. Social cognition was habitually lowered but not impaired in antagonistic narcissism. Our findings do not support a general \"lack of empathy.\" (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"157-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138814029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Head-to-head comparison of the alternative model for personality disorders and Section II personality disorder model in terms of predicting patient outcomes 1 year later. 人格障碍替代模型与第二部分人格障碍模型在预测患者 1 年后预后方面的正面比较。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI: 10.1037/per0000637
Laura C Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut, Jenneke M C Rovers, Jan H Kamphuis

The present study investigated the predictive validity of Criterion A and B of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) compared to the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder (PD) model in predicting patient outcomes 1 year after initial assessment, in a hetero-method longitudinal design. A clinical sample of 84 participants were administered both traditional Section II and AMPD interviews by two independent interviewers. One year after assessment, disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) and symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory) were assessed. The Section II PD model did not predict disability (R² = .01) nor symptom severity (R² = .03). The AMPD model, on the other hand, predicted both disability (R² = .23) and symptom severity (R² = .29) 1-year postinitial assessment. Both Criterion A and B were significant predictors, but when jointly combined only Criterion A remained significantly predictive of both disability and symptom severity while Criterion B did not. Criterion A thus appears to capture core vulnerabilities of personality-disordered patients that are related to future functioning and symptom severity. Implications for clinical practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究采用异种方法纵向设计,调查了人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的标准 A 和 B 与 DSM-5 第二部分人格障碍(PD)模型相比,在预测患者初次评估一年后的结果方面的预测有效性。由两名独立访谈员对 84 名临床样本进行了传统的第二部分和 AMPD 访谈。评估一年后,对残疾程度(世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0)和症状严重程度(简明症状量表)进行了评估。第二部分肢体残疾模型不能预测残疾程度(R² = 0.01),也不能预测症状严重程度(R² = 0.03)。而 AMPD 模型则能预测初次评估后 1 年的残疾程度(R² = .23)和症状严重程度(R² = .29)。标准 A 和标准 B 都是显著的预测因子,但当两者联合使用时,只有标准 A 仍能显著预测残疾和症状严重程度,而标准 B 则不能。因此,标准 A 似乎捕捉到了人格障碍患者与未来功能和症状严重程度相关的核心弱点。本文讨论了其对临床实践的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Head-to-head comparison of the alternative model for personality disorders and Section II personality disorder model in terms of predicting patient outcomes 1 year later.","authors":"Laura C Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut, Jenneke M C Rovers, Jan H Kamphuis","doi":"10.1037/per0000637","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000637","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the predictive validity of Criterion A and B of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) compared to the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder (PD) model in predicting patient outcomes 1 year after initial assessment, in a hetero-method longitudinal design. A clinical sample of 84 participants were administered both traditional Section II and AMPD interviews by two independent interviewers. One year after assessment, disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) and symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory) were assessed. The Section II PD model did not predict disability (<i>R</i>² = .01) nor symptom severity (<i>R</i>² = .03). The AMPD model, on the other hand, predicted both disability (<i>R</i>² = .23) and symptom severity (<i>R</i>² = .29) 1-year postinitial assessment. Both Criterion A and B were significant predictors, but when jointly combined only Criterion A remained significantly predictive of both disability and symptom severity while Criterion B did not. Criterion A thus appears to capture core vulnerabilities of personality-disordered patients that are related to future functioning and symptom severity. Implications for clinical practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9988099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the structure of personality dysfunction. 研究人格功能障碍的结构。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1037/per0000648
Chelsea E Sleep, Nathaniel L Phillips, Tianwei V Du, Colin Vize, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller

Personality impairment is a core feature of personality disorders in both current (i.e., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition [DSM-5] personality disorders, International Classification of Diseases,11th revision personality disorders) and emerging (i.e., DSM-5's alternative model of personality disorders) models of psychopathology. Yet, despite its importance within clinical nosology, attempts to identify its optimal lower-order structure have yielded inconsistent findings. Given its presence in diagnostic models, it is important to better understand its empirical structure across a variety of instantiations. To the degree that impairment is multifaceted, various factors may have different nomological networks and varied implications for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Therefore, participants were recruited from two large public universities in the present preregistered study (N = 574) to explore the construct's structure with exploratory "bass-ackward" factor analyses at the item level. Participants completed over 250 items from six commonly used measures of personality dysfunction. Criterion variables in its nomological network were also collected (e.g., general and pathological personality traits, internalizing/externalizing behavior, and personality disorders) using both self- and informant-reports. These factor analyses identified four lower-order facets of impairment (i.e., negative self-regard, disagreeableness, intimacy problems, and lack of direction), all of which showed moderate to strong overlap with traits from both general and pathological models of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在当前(即《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版[DSM-5]人格障碍、《国际疾病分类》第 11 版人格障碍)和新出现(即 DSM-5 的人格障碍替代模型)的精神病理学模型中,人格障碍都是人格障碍的核心特征。然而,尽管它在临床命名学中非常重要,但试图确定其最佳低阶结构的研究结果却并不一致。鉴于其在诊断模型中的存在,我们有必要更好地了解其在各种实例中的经验结构。由于障碍是多方面的,各种因素可能具有不同的名义网络,并对评估、诊断和治疗产生不同的影响。因此,本研究从两所大型公立大学中招募了参与者(N = 574),通过探索性的 "后向 "因子分析,在项目层面上探索障碍的结构。参与者完成了六种常用人格功能障碍测量中的 250 多个项目。此外,还通过自我报告和线人报告的方式收集了其命名网络中的标准变量(如一般人格和病态人格特征、内化/外化行为和人格障碍)。这些因子分析确定了四个低阶的损伤面(即消极自律、不合群、亲密关系问题和缺乏方向感),所有这些都与一般人格和病态人格模型中的特征有中度到高度的重叠。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Examining the structure of personality dysfunction.","authors":"Chelsea E Sleep, Nathaniel L Phillips, Tianwei V Du, Colin Vize, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller","doi":"10.1037/per0000648","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000648","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personality impairment is a core feature of personality disorders in both current (i.e., <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition [<i>DSM-5</i>] personality disorders, International <i>Classification of Diseases</i>,11th revision personality disorders) and emerging (i.e., <i>DSM-5'</i>s alternative model of personality disorders) models of psychopathology. Yet, despite its importance within clinical nosology, attempts to identify its optimal lower-order structure have yielded inconsistent findings. Given its presence in diagnostic models, it is important to better understand its empirical structure across a variety of instantiations. To the degree that impairment is multifaceted, various factors may have different nomological networks and varied implications for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Therefore, participants were recruited from two large public universities in the present preregistered study (<i>N</i> = 574) to explore the construct's structure with exploratory \"bass-ackward\" factor analyses at the item level. Participants completed over 250 items from six commonly used measures of personality dysfunction. Criterion variables in its nomological network were also collected (e.g., general and pathological personality traits, internalizing/externalizing behavior, and personality disorders) using both self- and informant-reports. These factor analyses identified four lower-order facets of impairment (i.e., negative self-regard, disagreeableness, intimacy problems, and lack of direction), all of which showed moderate to strong overlap with traits from both general and pathological models of personality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138814023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of borderline personality disorder symptoms on dialectical behavior therapy outcomes for eating disorders. 边缘型人格障碍症状对饮食失调辩证行为疗法疗效的影响。
Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI: 10.1037/per0000641
Dominic M Denning, Victoria Ciotti, Ayla Gioia, Thalia Viranda, Erin E Reilly, Laura A Berner, Elizabeth A Velkoff, Leslie K Anderson, Walter H Kaye, Christina E Wierenga, Tiffany A Brown

Existing literature on the effects of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and eating disorder (ED) comorbidity in terms of clinical presentation and treatment outcome has been limited and inconclusive. The present study examined whether clients with EDs and varying levels of BPD symptoms presented with more severe ED symptoms at admission, and whether they responded to dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)-based treatment. Participants (N = 176) were adults in a DBT-based partial hospitalization program for EDs at an academic medical center. Participants completed self-report measures at admission, 1-month postadmission, discharge, and 6-month follow-up. Results suggested that patients with elevated BPD symptoms at admission had greater ED symptoms during treatment, evidenced by small to moderate effect sizes. However, patients with high BPD symptoms demonstrated steeper declines in binge eating, fasting, and parasuicidal behavior early during treatment compared to patients with low BPD symptoms. Individuals with high BPD symptoms at admission (i.e., probable BPD diagnosis) were as likely to meet remission criteria and relapse as individuals with low BPD symptoms, though this null finding may be influenced by small cell sizes. Our findings also suggest that DBT skills use does not predict changes in symptoms. In sum, our findings suggest that while clients with higher BPD symptoms may improve during DBT-based partial hospitalization, their ED symptoms may remain more severe. Future studies are needed to determine whether adjunctive treatments improve outcomes for clients with EDs and comorbid BPD symptoms in DBT programs and whether skills use quality is a better predictor of ED symptom changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

关于边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和进食障碍(ED)并发症在临床表现和治疗结果方面的影响,现有的文献资料十分有限,而且没有定论。本研究考察了患有 ED 和不同程度 BPD 症状的患者在入院时是否表现出更严重的 ED 症状,以及他们是否对基于辩证行为疗法(DBT)的治疗做出了反应。参与者(N = 176)是在一家学术医疗中心参加基于 DBT 的 ED 部分住院治疗项目的成年人。参与者在入院、入院后 1 个月、出院和 6 个月随访时完成了自我报告测量。结果表明,入院时 BPD 症状较重的患者在治疗期间的 ED 症状较重,这体现在小到中等的效应大小上。然而,与 BPD 症状较轻的患者相比,BPD 症状较重的患者在治疗早期的暴饮暴食、禁食和寄生行为方面的下降幅度更大。入院时 BPD 症状较重的患者(即可能被诊断为 BPD)与 BPD 症状较轻的患者一样有可能达到缓解标准和复发,但这一无效结果可能受到小样本量的影响。我们的研究结果还表明,DBT 技能的使用并不能预测症状的变化。总之,我们的研究结果表明,虽然 BPD 症状较重的患者在基于 DBT 的部分住院治疗期间可能会有所改善,但他们的 ED 症状可能会更加严重。未来的研究需要确定,在 DBT 项目中,辅助治疗是否能改善具有 ED 和合并 BPD 症状的患者的治疗效果,以及技能使用质量是否能更好地预测 ED 症状的变化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Effects of borderline personality disorder symptoms on dialectical behavior therapy outcomes for eating disorders.","authors":"Dominic M Denning, Victoria Ciotti, Ayla Gioia, Thalia Viranda, Erin E Reilly, Laura A Berner, Elizabeth A Velkoff, Leslie K Anderson, Walter H Kaye, Christina E Wierenga, Tiffany A Brown","doi":"10.1037/per0000641","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000641","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing literature on the effects of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and eating disorder (ED) comorbidity in terms of clinical presentation and treatment outcome has been limited and inconclusive. The present study examined whether clients with EDs and varying levels of BPD symptoms presented with more severe ED symptoms at admission, and whether they responded to dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)-based treatment. Participants (<i>N</i> = 176) were adults in a DBT-based partial hospitalization program for EDs at an academic medical center. Participants completed self-report measures at admission, 1-month postadmission, discharge, and 6-month follow-up. Results suggested that patients with elevated BPD symptoms at admission had greater ED symptoms during treatment, evidenced by small to moderate effect sizes. However, patients with high BPD symptoms demonstrated steeper declines in binge eating, fasting, and parasuicidal behavior early during treatment compared to patients with low BPD symptoms. Individuals with high BPD symptoms at admission (i.e., probable BPD diagnosis) were as likely to meet remission criteria and relapse as individuals with low BPD symptoms, though this null finding may be influenced by small cell sizes. Our findings also suggest that DBT skills use does not predict changes in symptoms. In sum, our findings suggest that while clients with higher BPD symptoms may improve during DBT-based partial hospitalization, their ED symptoms may remain more severe. Future studies are needed to determine whether adjunctive treatments improve outcomes for clients with EDs and comorbid BPD symptoms in DBT programs and whether skills use quality is a better predictor of ED symptom changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"146-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10873472/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10057236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to Batky et al. (2023). 修正Batky等人(2023年)。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/per0000644

Reports an error in "Moderators of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and externalizing problems in youth" by Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin and Jennifer L. Tackett (Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 06, 2023, np). In the original article, the authors changed the order of authorship from "Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Jennifer L. Tackett, and Randall T. Salekin" to "Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin, and Jennifer L. Tackett." All versions of this article have been corrected. The names appear correctly in the original record. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-87326-001). Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (i.e., tendencies to experience low levels of guilt and empathy) are associated with severe and persistent conduct problems in youth. However, some youth with elevated CU traits do not exhibit severe externalizing problems, and further research is needed to identify conditions under which CU traits are more versus less strongly associated with higher levels of externalizing behavior. To this end, the current preregistered study examined whether internalizing problems, five-factor model personality traits, and parenting practices moderated associations between CU traits and externalizing problems. Caregivers of 1,232 youth ages 6-18 (Mage = 11.46) reported on youths' CU traits, externalizing, internalizing, and five-factor model traits as well as on their own parenting practices. We found that the relationship between CU traits and externalizing was robust to the moderating effects of internalizing problems and parenting practices, but CU traits were more strongly related to externalizing problems at higher levels of neuroticism and at lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of externalizing problems among youth high in CU traits and may inform future longitudinal and intervention research seeking to identify factors that reduce externalizing behavior among high-CU youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

报告了Blair D.Batky、Allison N.Shields、Randall T.Salekin和Jennifer L.Tackett在“无情的非情感特征与青年外化问题之间关系的调节者”中的一个错误(人格障碍:理论、研究和治疗,高级在线出版物,2023年7月6日,np)。在原文章中,作者将作者顺序从“Blair D.Batky、Allison N.Shields、Jennifer L.Tackett和Randall T.Salekin”更改为“Blair D.Batky、Alison N.Shiel、Randall T.Salekin和Jennifer L.Tackett”。本文的所有版本都已更正。(以下原始文章摘要出现在记录2023-87326-001中)。Callous Unmotional(CU)特征(即经历低水平内疚和移情的倾向)与青少年严重和持续的行为问题有关。然而,一些CU特征升高的年轻人并没有表现出严重的外化问题,需要进一步的研究来确定CU特征与更高水平的外化行为的相关性更强还是更低的条件。为此,目前的预注册研究考察了内化问题、五因素模型人格特征和育儿实践是否调节了CU特征和外化问题之间的关联。1232名6-18岁青年(Mage=11.46)的护理人员报告了青年的CU特征、外化、内化和五因素模型特征以及他们自己的育儿实践。我们发现,CU特征和外化之间的关系对内化问题和育儿实践的调节作用很强,但在较高的神经质水平、较低的宜人性和尽责性水平下,CU特征与外化问题的相关性更强。研究结果有助于更全面地了解高CU特征青年的外化问题,并可能为未来的纵向和干预研究提供信息,以确定减少高CU青年外化行为的因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Correction to Batky et al. (2023).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/per0000644","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Moderators of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and externalizing problems in youth\" by Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin and Jennifer L. Tackett (<i>Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment</i>, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 06, 2023, np). In the original article, the authors changed the order of authorship from \"Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Jennifer L. Tackett, and Randall T. Salekin\" to \"Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin, and Jennifer L. Tackett.\" All versions of this article have been corrected. The names appear correctly in the original record. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-87326-001). Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (i.e., tendencies to experience low levels of guilt and empathy) are associated with severe and persistent conduct problems in youth. However, some youth with elevated CU traits do not exhibit severe externalizing problems, and further research is needed to identify conditions under which CU traits are more versus less strongly associated with higher levels of externalizing behavior. To this end, the current preregistered study examined whether internalizing problems, five-factor model personality traits, and parenting practices moderated associations between CU traits and externalizing problems. Caregivers of 1,232 youth ages 6-18 (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.46) reported on youths' CU traits, externalizing, internalizing, and five-factor model traits as well as on their own parenting practices. We found that the relationship between CU traits and externalizing was robust to the moderating effects of internalizing problems and parenting practices, but CU traits were more strongly related to externalizing problems at higher levels of neuroticism and at lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of externalizing problems among youth high in CU traits and may inform future longitudinal and intervention research seeking to identify factors that reduce externalizing behavior among high-CU youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moderators of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and externalizing problems in youth. 冷酷无情的特质与青年外在问题之间关系的调节者。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI: 10.1037/per0000636
Blair D Batky, Allison N Shields, Randall T Salekin, Jennifer L Tackett

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment on Oct 26 2023 (see record 2024-19662-001). In the original article, the authors changed the order of authorship from "Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Jennifer L. Tackett, and Randall T. Salekin" to "Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin, and Jennifer L. Tackett." All versions of this article have been corrected. The names appear correctly in this record.] Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (i.e., tendencies to experience low levels of guilt and empathy) are associated with severe and persistent conduct problems in youth. However, some youth with elevated CU traits do not exhibit severe externalizing problems, and further research is needed to identify conditions under which CU traits are more versus less strongly associated with higher levels of externalizing behavior. To this end, the current preregistered study examined whether internalizing problems, five-factor model personality traits, and parenting practices moderated associations between CU traits and externalizing problems. Caregivers of 1,232 youth ages 6-18 (Mage = 11.46) reported on youths' CU traits, externalizing, internalizing, and five-factor model traits as well as on their own parenting practices. We found that the relationship between CU traits and externalizing was robust to the moderating effects of internalizing problems and parenting practices, but CU traits were more strongly related to externalizing problems at higher levels of neuroticism and at lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of externalizing problems among youth high in CU traits and may inform future longitudinal and intervention research seeking to identify factors that reduce externalizing behavior among high-CU youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Callous Unmotional(CU)特征(即经历低水平内疚和移情的倾向)与青少年严重和持续的行为问题有关。然而,一些CU特征升高的年轻人并没有表现出严重的外化问题,需要进一步的研究来确定CU特征与更高水平的外化行为的相关性更强还是更低的条件。为此,目前的预注册研究考察了内化问题、五因素模型人格特征和育儿实践是否调节了CU特征和外化问题之间的关联。1232名6-18岁青年(Mage=11.46)的护理人员报告了青年的CU特征、外化、内化和五因素模型特征以及他们自己的育儿实践。我们发现,CU特征和外化之间的关系对内化问题和育儿实践的调节作用很强,但在较高的神经质水平、较低的宜人性和尽责性水平下,CU特征与外化问题的相关性更强。研究结果有助于更全面地了解高CU特征青年的外化问题,并可能为未来的纵向和干预研究提供信息,以确定减少高CU青年外化行为的因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Moderators of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and externalizing problems in youth.","authors":"Blair D Batky, Allison N Shields, Randall T Salekin, Jennifer L Tackett","doi":"10.1037/per0000636","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000636","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in <i>Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment</i> on Oct 26 2023 (see record 2024-19662-001). In the original article, the authors changed the order of authorship from \"Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Jennifer L. Tackett, and Randall T. Salekin\" to \"Blair D. Batky, Allison N. Shields, Randall T. Salekin, and Jennifer L. Tackett.\" All versions of this article have been corrected. The names appear correctly in this record.] Callous-unemotional (CU) traits (i.e., tendencies to experience low levels of guilt and empathy) are associated with severe and persistent conduct problems in youth. However, some youth with elevated CU traits do not exhibit severe externalizing problems, and further research is needed to identify conditions under which CU traits are more versus less strongly associated with higher levels of externalizing behavior. To this end, the current preregistered study examined whether internalizing problems, five-factor model personality traits, and parenting practices moderated associations between CU traits and externalizing problems. Caregivers of 1,232 youth ages 6-18 (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.46) reported on youths' CU traits, externalizing, internalizing, and five-factor model traits as well as on their own parenting practices. We found that the relationship between CU traits and externalizing was robust to the moderating effects of internalizing problems and parenting practices, but CU traits were more strongly related to externalizing problems at higher levels of neuroticism and at lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of externalizing problems among youth high in CU traits and may inform future longitudinal and intervention research seeking to identify factors that reduce externalizing behavior among high-CU youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10132875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Connecting loneliness with pathological personality traits: Evidence for genetic and environmental mediation from a study of older twins. 将孤独与病态人格特征联系起来:老年双胞胎研究中的遗传和环境中介证据。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI: 10.1037/per0000635
Colin D Freilich, Matt McGue, Susan C South, Glenn I Roisman, Robert F Krueger

Loneliness has broad public health importance, especially in older adulthood, and there is some evidence suggesting it is associated with several personality disorders (PDs). The etiology of these PD-loneliness associations, however, has rarely been studied, especially in the context of the maladaptive traits of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD). To address these limitations, we estimated phenotypic, genetic, and unique environmental associations between loneliness and maladaptive personality traits in a sample of older adults from the Minnesota Twin Registry (n = 1,356, Mage = 70.4). Loneliness was moderately to strongly associated with each of the AMPD domains of negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism (r = .22-.58), with evidence of both genetic (rg = .45-.75) and unique environmental (re = .10-.48) influences explaining the associations to varying degrees. We argue that loneliness may be an underappreciated concomitant of personality pathology, with PD traits perhaps underlying its development. Indeed, these findings suggest that loneliness may be a manifestation of the genetic and environmental forces that also lead to pathological personality variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

孤独感对公众健康具有广泛的重要性,尤其是在老年期,而且有证据表明孤独感与几种人格障碍(PDs)有关。然而,这些人格障碍与孤独感关联的病因却很少被研究,尤其是在DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的适应不良特质背景下。 为了解决这些局限性,我们在明尼苏达双胞胎登记处(n = 1,356, Mage = 70.4)的老年人样本中估计了孤独感与适应不良人格特质之间的表型、遗传和独特环境关联。孤独与 AMPD 的消极情绪、疏离、对抗、抑制和精神病性(r = .22-.58)各领域都有中度到高度的关联,有证据表明遗传(rg = .45-.75)和独特环境(re = .10-.48)的影响在不同程度上解释了这些关联。我们认为,孤独可能是人格病理学中一个未被充分重视的伴随因素,而人格病理学特征可能是其发展的基础。事实上,这些研究结果表明,孤独可能是遗传和环境力量的一种表现形式,而遗传和环境力量也会导致病态人格的变异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Connecting loneliness with pathological personality traits: Evidence for genetic and environmental mediation from a study of older twins.","authors":"Colin D Freilich, Matt McGue, Susan C South, Glenn I Roisman, Robert F Krueger","doi":"10.1037/per0000635","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness has broad public health importance, especially in older adulthood, and there is some evidence suggesting it is associated with several personality disorders (PDs). The etiology of these PD-loneliness associations, however, has rarely been studied, especially in the context of the maladaptive traits of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD). To address these limitations, we estimated phenotypic, genetic, and unique environmental associations between loneliness and maladaptive personality traits in a sample of older adults from the Minnesota Twin Registry (<i>n</i> = 1,356, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 70.4). Loneliness was moderately to strongly associated with each of the AMPD domains of negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism (<i>r</i> = .22-.58), with evidence of both genetic (<i>r</i><sub>g</sub> = .45-.75) and unique environmental (<i>r</i><sub>e</sub> = .10-.48) influences explaining the associations to varying degrees. We argue that loneliness may be an underappreciated concomitant of personality pathology, with PD traits perhaps underlying its development. Indeed, these findings suggest that loneliness may be a manifestation of the genetic and environmental forces that also lead to pathological personality variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"34-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10259363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Insecure attachment and personality pathology: Concurrent assessment and longitudinal modeling. 不安全依恋与人格病理学:并发评估和纵向建模。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.1037/per0000606
Madison Shea Smith, Susan C South

Insecure attachment and personality pathology are parallel frameworks for representing interpersonal dysfunction. Although research to date has revealed strong bivariate associations between these constructs, the current state of the science is nonspecific and leaves piecemeal guidance for clinical and empirical efforts. The goal of the present study was to determine the magnitude of the associations between attachment and personality pathology across two conceptualizations of maladaptivity and across three waves of time, thereby satisfying repeated calls for empirical innovation in this area. A sample of newlywed heterosexual couples (N = 202 individuals) completed longitudinal assessments of personality pathology and romantic attachment insecurity. Results suggested that the covariation of attachment and personality pathology may be marred by measurement problems related to distress saturation in attachment and personality disorder instruments. Latent curve modeling further suggested that attachment insecurity and personality disorders fluctuate concurrently within persons. Future research should work toward validating unity models of attachment and personality pathology, correcting key measures, and documenting specific mechanisms of association between these constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

不安全依恋和人格病理学是代表人际功能障碍的平行框架。尽管迄今为止的研究已经揭示了这两个概念之间的密切联系,但目前的科学状况并不具体,对临床和实证工作的指导也很零碎。本研究的目标是确定依恋与人格病理学之间的关联程度,这种关联跨越了两种 "畸恋 "概念和三个时间波段,从而满足了人们对这一领域经验创新的一再呼吁。新婚异性夫妇样本(N = 202 人)完成了人格病理学和恋爱依恋不安全感的纵向评估。结果表明,依恋和人格病理学的共变性可能会受到与依恋和人格障碍工具的困扰饱和有关的测量问题的影响。潜曲线模型进一步表明,依恋不安全感和人格障碍在人体内会同时出现波动。未来的研究应致力于验证依恋和人格病理学的统一模型,修正关键测量指标,并记录这些建构之间的具体关联机制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Insecure attachment and personality pathology: Concurrent assessment and longitudinal modeling.","authors":"Madison Shea Smith, Susan C South","doi":"10.1037/per0000606","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insecure attachment and personality pathology are parallel frameworks for representing interpersonal dysfunction. Although research to date has revealed strong bivariate associations between these constructs, the current state of the science is nonspecific and leaves piecemeal guidance for clinical and empirical efforts. The goal of the present study was to determine the magnitude of the associations between attachment and personality pathology across two conceptualizations of maladaptivity and across three waves of time, thereby satisfying repeated calls for empirical innovation in this area. A sample of newlywed heterosexual couples (<i>N</i> = 202 individuals) completed longitudinal assessments of personality pathology and romantic attachment insecurity. Results suggested that the covariation of attachment and personality pathology may be marred by measurement problems related to distress saturation in attachment and personality disorder instruments. Latent curve modeling further suggested that attachment insecurity and personality disorders fluctuate concurrently within persons. Future research should work toward validating unity models of attachment and personality pathology, correcting key measures, and documenting specific mechanisms of association between these constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"46-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10679407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Personality disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1