Primary health care research & development最新文献

Aim: To explore factors shaping social prescribing (SP) link workers (LWs) experiences of their job, and how they influence decisions about whether or not to leave it.

Background: LWs support healthcare delivery by listening to patients' non-medical concerns and social or relational difficulties, connecting them to 'community assets' (groups, organizations, charities) when relevant to help. LWs try to assist people with often complex emotional and/or social issues. This can affect how they feel in their job.

Methods: As part of a mixed methods project on LW retention, a qualitative study was conducted. It involved 20 LWs, purposively selected from respondents to a questionnaire; variation in the sample was sought in terms of self-efficacy in the role, length of time in it, intention to leave or not, employing organization, where they worked in the UK and gender. Semi-structured interviews, conducted via Microsoft Teams, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Prior to interviews, we asked participants to take photographs of: a typical part of their working day; something that gave them confidence in their role; an unexpected part of their role. These photographs were discussed at the start of the interview. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data (the computer programme NVIVO supported this); this involved coding and clustering codes to develop analytical themes.

Findings: We produced four themes from the data; 1) Disconnection through place and space: straddling different organizational spheres; 2) Delivery ambiguity: vagueness around the link worker role; 3) Job misalignment and realignment: navigating identity and boundaries; 4) Clouded by instability: uncertainty around career advancement and sustainability. This led to the development of an overarching theme of LWs inhabiting a liminal space as they entered and undertook the role. Findings highlight the importance of training, supervision and other support to ensure LWs do not experience a prolonged liminal state.

Background: Primary care serves as the foundation of a well-functioning healthcare system and is critical for ensuring equitable access, early disease management, and cost-effective service delivery. In China, reforming primary-level healthcare institutions has become a national priority to achieve universal health coverage. Understanding the service users' perspectives is essential to align primary care services with population health needs and improving trust in grassroots healthcare providers.

Aim: To evaluate satisfaction and unmet service needs among primary care users in Jiangsu Province, China.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using structured questionnaires was given to 424 residents in urban and rural Jiangsu Province to measure satisfaction with primary hospitals, doctors, service preferences, and perceived gaps. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to identify regional differences.

Results: The primary care utilisation rate among respondents was 73.3%. While 75.2% reported satisfaction with medical expenses at primary-level facilities, significant urban-rural and regional differences were observed in service awareness, health policy knowledge, and perceived quality of doctor-patient communication. Primary care doctors received the highest ratings for using "easy-to-understand language"(mean score 4.13 ± 0.821) but lower scores for "professional competence" and "treatment effectiveness" (both 3.91). Rural inhabitants expressed high demand for services like management of common diseases (65.8%) and routine health examinations (52.4%), but highlighted shortages in advanced diagnostic tools (e.g., CT scans, endoscopy). Most inhabitants (67.2%) felt that primary care providers require improvement, particularly in clinical competency and communication.

Conclusion: The findings highlight areas for targeted policy interventions to improve primary care service delivery and capacity-building of primary care doctors in Jiangsu Province.

Aim: To understand patterns of cannabis use and self-management experiences in patients with chronic disease during the post-legalization period in Thailand and to quantify such experiences and perceptions.

Background: Patients with chronic disease are a population in which disease self-management is potentially involved with the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs). The recent changes in cannabis regulation in Thailand have allowed retail selling and home cultivation. Cannabis is a medicinal herb in many traditional Thai recipes and is often adopted as a CAM in the chronic disease population. The adoption of cannabis products as part of CAM could lead to changes in chronic disease outcomes.

Methods: Exploratory-sequential mixed methods were used in this study. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted to acquire a basic understanding of the patients' experiences. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was applied. Subsequently, a cross-sectional study was conducted to quantify the patterns of cannabis use and self-management experience in patients with diabetes and/or hypertension.

Findings: Eleven patients were interviewed, and 124 patients participated in the cross-sectional study. Most of the participants were male, married, and identified as Buddhist. Many patients believed that cannabis could improve their health, while fewer considered it a threat to their health. In general, the patients viewed cannabis as a way to enhance their quality of life and treat chronic diseases. Some patients embraced the principles of CAM. They primarily used cannabis tea daily to manage diabetes or hypertension, with their approaches being more complementary than alternative. However, only one-third (34.7%) were aware of potential drug interactions with their concurrent medications.

Background: Written referrals and follow-up correspondence between referring general practitioners (GPs) and psychiatrists is a medico-legal responsibility and integral part of caring for patients with mental illness. Objective: To describe expectations and practices that GPs and psychiatrists have when exchanging correspondence concerning patients with mental health problems.

Methods: In this observational, declarative, and cross-sectional study, two surveys were used to evaluate the expectations, frequency, and content of correspondence exchanged between GPs and psychiatrists. The questionnaire was based on the National College for the Quality of Psychiatric Care 2010 recommendations. Conducted in a regional setting in France between 2014 and 2016, the study involved 2754 GPs and 575 psychiatrists.

Results: Overall, we achieved a positive response rate of 33% (189/575) of psychiatrists and 23% (628/2754) of GPs, which was similar in each local region. Regarding the correspondence from GPs to psychiatrists, 478 (75%) GPs declared having written a referral for an initial consultation and 84 (44%) psychiatrists declared having received a referral. Regarding the correspondence from psychiatrists to GPs, 144 (76%) psychiatrists declared having written at least one letter after the initial consultation or during follow-up and 160 (25%) GPs declared having received return correspondence. The GPs would like to be better informed about psychotherapeutic or long-term management, leave of absence from work, surveillance measures, prognosis, and division of specialist roles. The psychiatrists would like to receive more information about previous medication trialed, the level of willingness the patient has to consult a psychiatrist and any allergies or intolerances to medication.

Conclusion: This study highlights the need to improve the disparity between expected and received correspondence from GPs and psychiatrists concerning patients with mental health problems.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate self-management experiences at home among gynaecological cancer patients with lower limb lymphoedema.

Background: Lower limb lymphoedema is a common complication following gynaecological tumour treatment, causing physical and psychological distress and significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Clinical observations reveal that many patients with lower limb lymphoedema following gynaecological tumour treatment exhibit poor compliance with family self-management, leading to complications such as worsening oedema, cellulitis, or erysipelas. This study seeks to gain insight into patients' actual self-management experiences within their families, offering insights for tailored intervention plans and improved patient self-management compliance in clinical practice.

Methods: Employing a phenomenological approach in qualitative research, one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather face-to-face data from participants. A total of 16 gynaecological cancer patients with lower extremity lymphoedema were selected via purposive sampling from a tertiary cancer hospital. Semi-structured in-depth interviews took place between February and July 2021, with data analysed via the Colaizzi 7-step analysis method.

Findings: Five key themes emerged: inadequate and uneven availability of medical resources for patients with lymphoedema, limited support for patients, deficient home self-management skills, considerable psychological stress during home management, and variations in self-management behaviours.

Conclusion: Based on the study findings, increased investment in lymphoedema-related medical care is recommended. Additionally, healthcare professionals can consider promoting family and social support, enhancing patient health education, offering remote psychological counselling, encouraging positive coping behaviours among gynaecological cancer patients with lower limb lymphoedema, and ultimately enhancing their self-management at home.

Aim: To investigate factors influencing the recruitment and retention of adult community nurses.

Background: The recruitment and retention of community nurses is a growing global challenge, exacerbated by aging populations and increasing demand for primary and home-based care. Across Europe, nurse shortages threaten healthcare sustainability, with high attrition rates linked to workplace pressures, inadequate staffing, and emotional exhaustion. Despite efforts to strengthen retention, many European countries struggle to maintain adequate staffing levels, particularly in community nursing.

Methods: An exploratory qualitative approach was used with semi-structured interviews. The interview schedule was shaped by the study's aims, a prior integrative literature review, and the 'causal model of turnover for nurses'. Questions explored participants' experiences of recruitment into community nursing and factors influencing retention. The study focused on registered nurses and service managers within adult community nursing organizations across diverse geographical areas.

Findings: The study identified eight main themes influencing recruitment and retention: the perfect job, finding true self and fulfilment, alignment with organizational values, prior development and transitional experience, job dissatisfaction, shift in traditional practices, lack of compassionate leadership, and family commitments. Key factors included workplace flexibility, professional identity, job security, and organizational culture. However, challenges such as staffing shortages, lack of career progression, and increased administrative tasks were significant barriers to retention.

Conclusion: This study highlights the multifaceted challenges surrounding community nurse recruitment and retention, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies that go beyond traditional hospital-focused approaches. While salary improvements remain crucial, broader systemic changes including workplace flexibility, compassionate leadership, and career development opportunities are essential to fostering a sustainable workforce. By addressing these factors through co-designed solutions and evidence-based policy adjustments, healthcare organizations can enhance job satisfaction, reduce attrition, and ultimately strengthen the future of community nursing.

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.

Background: Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.

Methods: Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.

Findings: SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.

Background: Primary healthcare units (PHCUs) in Austria play a crucial role in providing regionally tailored, high-quality care through interprofessional teams. Barriers, such as limited training and unclear roles, hinder effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC). Additionally, healthcare and social professionals (HCSPs) in primary healthcare (PHC) face a rise in patients with non-communicable diseases and increasing climate-related challenges, underscoring the need for education addressing IPC and sustainability to build resilient healthcare.

Aim: This paper presents the protocol of the REALISE study, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a didactic concept integrating collaborative, digital, and sustainability skills within multimodal training modules (including simulations).

Methods: In this prospective trial, HCSPs working in PHC and students in their final year of education in related professions are recruited to participate in interprofessional training modules, which take place on four days within a month in person and with additional e-learning elements between those days. The modules consist of didactic elements on IPC and sustainability, simulation scenarios with acting patients, and immersive virtual reality scenarios. The primary outcomes assess IPC by utilizing the Teamwork Assessment Scale, the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (9a/9b), and the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey. Secondary outcomes focus on sustainability and environmental awareness, as well as the organization and structure of the training modules.

Discussion: The findings of this study will demonstrate the effect of proprietary training modules on IPC and will inform on the integration of respective modules into standard curricula and continuing educational programmes at the Salzburg University of Applied Sciences.