Surgery open science最新文献

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted the collective American psyche. Socioeconomic hardships including social isolation led to an increase in firearm sales. Previous regional studies demonstrated increased penetrating trauma during the pandemic but it is unclear if trauma systems were prepared for this influx of penetrating injuries. This study aimed to confirm this increased penetrating trauma trend nationally and hypothesized penetrating trauma patients treated during the pandemic had a higher risk of complications and death, compared to pre-pandemic patients.

Methods

The 2017–2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was divided into pre-pandemic (2017–2019) and pandemic years (2020). Bivariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed controlling for age, comorbidities, injuries, and vitals on arrival.

Results

From 3,525,132 patients, 936,890 (26.6 %) presented during the pandemic. The pandemic patients had a higher rate of stab-wounds (4.8 % vs. 4.5 %, p > 0.001) and gunshot wounds (5.8 % vs. 4.6 %, p < 0.001) compared to pre-pandemic patients. Among penetrating trauma patients, the rate and associated risk of in-hospital complications (5.0 % vs. 5.1 %, p = 0.38) (OR 0.98, CI 0.94–1.02, p = 0.26) was similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts but adjusted risk of mortality decreased during the pandemic (8.3 % vs. 8.3 %, p = 0.45) (OR 0.92, CI 0.89–0.96, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This national analysis confirms an increased rate of penetrating trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a higher rate of gunshot injuries. However, this did not result in an increased risk of death or complications suggesting that trauma systems across the country were prepared to handle a dual pandemic of COVID and firearm violence.

Background

The optimal training program to transform a new resident into a competent and capable surgeon is constantly evolving. Competency-based evaluation represents a change in mindset from quantitative or chronologic metrics for graduate readiness. As surgery becomes more specialized, more dependent on technology, and more public, we must continue to improve our ability to pass on technical skills. Approaching surgery in a component-based fashion enables even the most complex operation to be broken down into smaller sets of steps that range the entire spectrum of complexity. Treating an operation through the lens of its components, emphasizing stepwise forward progression in a trainee's experience, may provide a way to train competent surgeons more efficiently. Current case-logging products do not provide adequate granularity to apply this methodology.

Methods

Application design relied on the involvement of local surgeons from all specialties and subspecialties related to general surgical training. Individual interviews with multiple experts in each field were used to generate a list of most commonly performed operations. Once a consensus was reached, the same surgeons were queried on what they felt were the core steps that make up each operation. This information was utilized to create a novel mobile application which enables the user to record cases by date, attending surgeon, specific operation, and which portions of the operation they were able/allowed to perform.

Conclusion

Component-based case logging through the Logix application may be a useful adjunct as we continue to implement competency-based surgical training. Future investigation will assess user experience and compare subjective and objective metrics of training progression between the Logix application and currently utilized products. The information provided by the application stands to benefit not just trainees, but educators, training programs, and regulatory bodies.

Key message

Component-based case logging via a novel mobile application stands to increase the efficiency of surgical training and more effectively assess trainee competency.

Background

With the aging of the population, more and more patients ≥90 years old are undergoing surgery. We retrospectively examined factors affecting morbidity and in-hospital mortality among patients ≥90 years old who underwent emergency abdominal operations.

Materials and methods

Forty-six cases of emergency abdominal surgery for patients ≥90 years old who underwent surgery at our hospital between 2011 and 2022 were included in this study. Factors affecting morbidity and in-hospital mortality were analyzed statistically. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM)-predicted morbidity and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM)-predicted mortality were calculated.

Results

Postoperative complications occurred in 30 patients (65.2 %) and 5 patients (10.8 %) died in the hospital. Factors affecting morbidity included American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, operative time and blood loss, and operative severity score. Multivariate analysis identified male sex, operative severity score, and length of hospital stay as factors affecting morbidity. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and physiological score were identified as factors influencing mortality in hospital, and only physiological score was identified in the multivariate analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for POSSUM-predicted morbidity was 0.796 and area under the ROC curve for P-POSSUM-predicted mortality was 0.805, both of which were moderately accurate.

Conclusion

Risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients ≥90 years old may be predictable to some extent, and we are able to provide convincing explanations to patients and families based on these data.

Background

Physician wellbeing and burnout are significant threats to the healthcare workforce. Mobile electronic medical record access and smartphones allow for efficient communication in healthcare but may lead to workplace telepressure (WPT).

Methods

An IRB-approved survey related to five domains of burnout [WPT, smartphone usage, boundary control, and psychologic detachment] was circulated. Internal medicine and general surgery faculty and residents were surveyed between 3/2021 and 6/2021. Survey results were analyzed for internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha coefficient and validation against a known physician burnout scale.

Results

The domains were internally valid with a Cronbach alpha of 0.888. Validation against the physician burnout scale was significantly correlated with WPT domains but was overall positively correlated across domains. Surgical trainees reported the highest burnout rate related to every domain.

Conclusion

Survey-based WPT burnout scales provide insight into the daily pressures on physicians. Targeted interventions to limit WPT are needed to improve physician wellbeing.

Background

Postoperative pain following abdominal surgery is a significant obstacle to patient recovery, often necessitating high analgesic doses associated with adverse effects like cognitive impairment and cardiorespiratory depression. Reliable animal models are crucial for understanding the pathophysiology of post surgical pain and developing more effective pain-relieving strategies.

Methods

We developed a mouse model to replicate peritoneal trauma induced by abdominal surgery. 30 C57BL/6 mice underwent laparotomy, with half undergoing standardised peritoneal abrasion and the rest serving as controls. Mouse recovery was assessed using two validated scoring systems of surgical recovery: Post surgery Severity Assessment (PSSA) and Mouse Grimace Score (MGS). Blood samples were taken for cytokine analysis. Adhesions were evaluated on day 6, and peritoneal tissue was examined for healing markers.

Results

After laparotomy, all mice exhibited expected pain profiles. Mice with peritoneal abrasion had significantly higher PSSA (7.2 ± 1.2 vs 4.68 ± 0.82, p ≤ 0.001) and MGS scores (3.62 ± 0.74 vs 0.82 ± 0.40, p ≤ 0.05) with slower recovery. Serum inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly elevated in the abraded group, and adhesion formation was higher in this group. Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly increased expression of α-SMA, CD31, CD68, and F4/80 in peritoneal tissue in the abraded group.

Discussion

A mouse model involving laparotomy and standardised peritoneal abrasion replicates the expected pathophysiological changes following abdominal surgery. It will be a useful model for better understanding the mechanisms of post surgical pain and developing improved pain-relief strategies. It also has utility for the study of intra-abdominal adhesion formation.

Key message

To understand the intricate relationship between peritoneal trauma-induced pain, cytokine response, and post-operative adhesion formation in mouse models for advancing therapeutic interventions and enhancing post-operative recovery outcomes.

Background

Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been linked with improved survival for locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the existence of disparities in its utilization remains to be elucidated.

Methods

All adults with PDAC were tabulated from the 2011–2017 Nationwide Cancer Database. Tumor vascular involvement was determined using the clinical T stage and CS_EXTENSION variables. The significance of temporal trends was calculated using Cuzick's non-parametric test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of NAT utilization on hazard of two-year mortality. A logistic regression model was developed to determine factors associated with receipt of NAT.

Results

Of 3811 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.8 % received NAT. NAT utilization significantly increased over the study period, from 31.7 % in 2011 to 81.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly reduced two-year mortality (Hazards Ratio 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.18–0.67).

After adjustment, younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.97/year, CI 0.96–0.98) and Black (AOR 0.65, CI 0.48–0.89; ref: White) patients demonstrated reduced odds of NAT. Furthermore, patients with Medicare (AOR 0.73, CI 0.59–0.90; ref: Private) or Medicaid insurance (AOR 0.67, CI 0.46–0.97; ref: Private) had lower odds of NAT, as did those treated at non-academic institutions (Community: AOR 0.42, CI 0.35–0.52, Integrated: 0.68, CI 0.54–0.85) or in the lowest education quartile (AOR 0.52, CI 0.29–0.95; ref: Highest).

Conclusions

We identified increasing utilization of NAT for BR/LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite being linked with significantly reduced two-year mortality, socioeconomic disparities affect odds of NAT.

Subcutaneous injection of unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently utilized for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis. We previously discovered that nurses believe patients experience more pain with UH compared to the LMWH enoxaparin; however, no published studies that are appropriately powered exist comparing pain associated with subcutaneous chemoprophylaxis. Our objective was to assess if differences exist in pain associated with subcutaneous administration of UH and enoxaparin. We conducted an observational study of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between 11/2017–4/2019. All patients received one of three prophylactic regimens: (1) UH only, (2) Initial dose of UH followed by enoxaparin, or (3) enoxaparin only. Of the 74 patients observed, 40 patients received UH followed by enoxaparin, 17 received UH only, and 17 received enoxaparin only. There was a significant difference in patients' mean perceived pain between subcutaneous UH and enoxaparin injections (mean post-injection pain after UH 3.3 vs. enoxaparin 1.5; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perceived pain for patients who received consecutive UH or enoxaparin injections. Differences in pain associated with different chemoprophylaxis agents may be an unrecognized driver of patient refusals of VTE chemoprophylaxis and may lead to worse VTE outcomes.

Background

Centralization of care jeopardizes interns' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. Here we present the development and evaluation of a structured digital curriculum, offered in addition to the clinical internship, to address these challenges.

Methods

The structured digital curriculum was implemented in a the VUmc/Amsterdam UMC surgical internship program in the Netherlands. The curriculum used a modular format built around a skill or clinical condition. Each module included background information, digital elements like e-learnings and interactive vlogs, and self-assessments. From April 1st to June 30th, 2022, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation comparing interns' experiences between the conventional and digital curriculum through surveys and interviews.

Results

Thirty-nine interns (28.1 %) completed the survey, 17 (24.2 %) from the traditional curriculum and 22 (31.9 %) from the structured blended curriculum. Results from the interviews triangulated and complemented survey results. Interns appreciated both curricula (course marks 7.4 ± 2.0 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1, P = 0.207). The intervention cohort specifically appreciated the structured and comprehensive presentation of available study materials, which resulted in a sense of empowerment.

Conclusions

Integrating a structured digital curriculum to support clinical internships provides interns with comprehensive, readily accessible knowledge, refines their understanding of clinical topics, and results in feelings of empowerment. The combination of clinical and digital education ensures adequate exposure to subjects vital for future doctors, even if clinical exposure is limited. Thus, using a structured digital curriculum prepares the intern and helps the internship program to adequately navigate future medical challenges.

Key message

Centralization of care jeopardizes interns' learning experiences and necessitates educational changes. A structured digital curriculum can empower interns in this scenario by providing readily accessible knowledge which refines their understanding of clinical topics.

Introduction

New strategies and methods are needed to ensure that new generations can train and acquire surgical skills in a safe environment.

Materials and methods

From January 2020 to October 2020, we performed a single centre, prospective observational cohort study. 19 participants (15 students, 4 residents) enrolled and 16 participants (13 students, 3 residents) successfully completed the curriculum. We performed a quantitative data analysis to evaluate its effectiveness in gaining and improving basic surgical endoscopic skills.

Results

The time for single knot tying pre-, mid-, and post-training was reduced significantly, the average time (sec) decreased by 79.5 % (p < 0.001), the total linear distance (cm) by 74.5 % (p < 0.001) and the total angular distance (rad) by 71.7 % (p < 0.001). The average acceleration (mm/s²) increased by 20 % (p = 0.041). Additionally, the average speed increased by 23.5 % (p < 0.001), while motion smoothness (m/s³) increased by 20.4 % (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The obtained performance scores showed a significant increase in participants improving their basic surgical performance skills on the endoscopic simulator. This curriculum can be easily implemented in any surgical specialty as part of the residency training curriculum before first exposure in the operation room. All 16 participants recommended the implementation of such simulator training in their surgical training curriculum.

Medical school clerkship grades are an important method for applicants to distinguish themselves when applying to residency programs. Given the lack of standardization among medical schools in the clerkship grading process, it has become more challenging for orthopaedic surgery residencies to ascertain the true value of surgery clerkship grades between applicants. This letter to the editor is a response to the article by Hoy et al., “Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades,” and offers further perspectives on the variability of surgery clerkship grading and its effect on applicants.