首页 > 最新文献

Agronomy Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Foliar ethylene chlormequat chloride improves sorghum productivity and nitrogen use efficiency 叶面氯吡氯乙酯提高了高粱的生产力和氮素利用效率
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70240
Peng Yan, Mengying Fang, Meng Wang, Liang Ren, Xuerui Dong, Lu Lin, Zhiqiang Dong

Plant growth regulators can enhance row crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency. We conducted 2 year field experiments (2020–2021) in the North Central China Plain (NCP) to evaluate a foliar ethephon-chlormequat chloride (ECC) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 60, 120, and 240 kg N ha−1) on sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench) yield and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUEs). The control treatment (CK) received a foliar water spray. ECC increased sorghum yield by an average of 4.5%, 5.9%, and 4.7% under 60, 120, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively, relative to CK across 2 experimental years. Moreover, ECC significantly (p < 0.05) increased sorghum root biomass, root to shoot ratio, leaf nitrate reductase activity, chlorophyll content, and nitrogen uptake, thereby improving both nitrogen uptake efficiency and agronomic efficiency. Sorghum yield increased significantly with nitrogen application up to 120 kg ha−1, with no additional yield gain beyond this rate. Nitrogen uptake increased with higher nitrogen rates up to 240 kg ha−1, whereas nitrogen agronomic efficiency declined when nitrogen fertilization exceeding 60 kg ha−1 in both experimental years. Overall, foliar spraying ECC at five-leaf stage, combined with 120 kg N ha−1, achieved high sorghum yield and improved NUE in the NCP.

植物生长调节剂可以提高行作物产量和养分利用效率。我们在华北平原(NCP)进行了为期2年的田间试验(2020-2021),以评估高粱(sorghum Bicolor (L.))叶面乙烯-氯草枯(ECC)和氮肥(0、60、120和240 kg N ha - 1)的施用效果。产量和氮利用效率(NUEs)。对照处理(CK)叶面喷水。2个试验年,在60、120和240 kg ha - 1处理下,与对照相比,ECC可使高粱产量平均提高4.5%、5.9%和4.7%。此外,ECC显著(p < 0.05)提高了高粱根系生物量、根冠比、叶片硝酸盐还原酶活性、叶绿素含量和氮素吸收,从而提高了高粱的氮素吸收效率和农艺效率。当施氮量达到120 kg ha - 1时,高粱产量显著增加,超过这个量后没有额外的产量增加。当施氮量达到240 kg ha - 1时,氮素吸收量增加,而当施氮量超过60 kg ha - 1时,两个试验年份的氮素农艺效率均下降。总体而言,五叶期叶面喷施ECC,配施120 kg N ha - 1,可提高高粱产量和氮肥利用效率。
{"title":"Foliar ethylene chlormequat chloride improves sorghum productivity and nitrogen use efficiency","authors":"Peng Yan,&nbsp;Mengying Fang,&nbsp;Meng Wang,&nbsp;Liang Ren,&nbsp;Xuerui Dong,&nbsp;Lu Lin,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Dong","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70240","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant growth regulators can enhance row crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency. We conducted 2 year field experiments (2020–2021) in the North Central China Plain (NCP) to evaluate a foliar ethephon-chlormequat chloride (ECC) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 60, 120, and 240 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) on sorghum (<i>Sorghum Bicolor</i> (L.) Moench) yield and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUEs). The control treatment (CK) received a foliar water spray. ECC increased sorghum yield by an average of 4.5%, 5.9%, and 4.7% under 60, 120, and 240 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, relative to CK across 2 experimental years. Moreover, ECC significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) increased sorghum root biomass, root to shoot ratio, leaf nitrate reductase activity, chlorophyll content, and nitrogen uptake, thereby improving both nitrogen uptake efficiency and agronomic efficiency. Sorghum yield increased significantly with nitrogen application up to 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with no additional yield gain beyond this rate. Nitrogen uptake increased with higher nitrogen rates up to 240 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, whereas nitrogen agronomic efficiency declined when nitrogen fertilization exceeding 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in both experimental years. Overall, foliar spraying ECC at five-leaf stage, combined with 120 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, achieved high sorghum yield and improved NUE in the NCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Survey of deans of agriculture” 更正“农业学院院长调查”
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70248

Zimdahl, R. L. (2025). Survey of deans of agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 117, e70216. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70216

The special section title, “Special Section: Ethical Issues in Production Agriculture,” was missing in the original published article.

We apologize for this error.

Zimdahl, r.l.(2025)。农业学院院长调查。农学通报,2011,27(3):391 - 391。https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70216The特别章节标题“特别章节:农业生产中的伦理问题”在最初发表的文章中缺失。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Survey of deans of agriculture”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70248","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zimdahl, R. L. (2025). Survey of deans of agriculture. <i>Agronomy Journal</i>, <i>117</i>, e70216. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70216</p><p>The special section title, “Special Section: Ethical Issues in Production Agriculture,” was missing in the original published article.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70248","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Calibration and validation of the CERES-Wheat model in DSSAT to assess climate change impacts and adaptation options for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in central Oromia, Ethiopia DSSAT中CERES-Wheat模型的校准和验证,以评估埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚中部小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)产量的气候变化影响和适应方案
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70238
Seifu Kibebew, Nigussie Dechassa, Yibekal Alemayehu, Feyera Merga, Girma Megersa

This study calibrated and validated the Crop Environment Resource Synthesis-wheat model within Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptation strategies under various emission scenarios in Central Oromia, Ethiopia. Field data from three consecutive growing seasons (2021/22–2023/24) were used to calibrate the model's genetic coefficients, while 2024/25 data served for validation. Calibration results showed strong agreement with observed data, with normalized root mean square error RMSEn below 10% for all variables. Validation across stations produced R2 values between 0.74 and 0.97 and RMSEn from 2.89% to 19.77%, confirming the model's reliability in simulating wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and yield. Using the validated model, climate change impacts were evaluated under baseline (1991–2022) and future scenarios (SSP4.5 and SSP8.5 for the 2050s and 2080s). Simulations indicated notable cultivar- and location-specific yield responses, with most stations showing declines under SSP8.5 by the 2080s. At Degem, yield reductions of 9.75%–38.85% were projected for the Triticum aestivum L. ‘Wane’ cultivar under SSP8.5. Bishoftu showed declines for both Wane and Dendea, particularly under SSP8.5 in the 2080s, while Fitche recorded a 2.66%–6.5% decrease for Wane in the same period. Adaptation analysis under SSP8.5 revealed that delayed planting improved Wane performance at Degem, and late-maturing cultivars were better suited to Degem and Fitche. However, at Bishoftu, neither planting adjustments nor cultivar selection mitigated yield losses, underscoring the need for integrated adaptation approaches. Future studies should incorporate multi-model comparisons, broader adaptation options, and socioeconomic considerations to ensure sustainable wheat production in Central Oromia under climate change.

本研究对农业技术转移决策支持系统中的作物环境资源综合-小麦模型进行了校准和验证,以评估埃塞俄比亚中部奥罗米亚不同排放情景下的气候变化影响和适应策略。使用连续三个生长季节(2021/22-2023/24)的田间数据校准模型的遗传系数,而2024/25数据用于验证。校准结果显示与观测数据高度一致,所有变量的标准化均方根误差RMSEn均低于10%。跨站验证的R2值在0.74 ~ 0.97之间,RMSEn值在2.89% ~ 19.77%之间,验证了模型模拟小麦生长和产量的可靠性。利用经过验证的模型,在基线(1991-2022年)和未来情景(2050年代和2080年代的SSP4.5和SSP8.5)下评估了气候变化的影响。模拟结果显示,到2080年代,大多数站点的产量在SSP8.5以下有所下降。在Degem,在SSP8.5下,预估小麦减产9.75% ~ 38.85%。Bishoftu显示了Wane和Dendea的下降,特别是在21世纪80年代低于SSP8.5,而Fitche在同一时期记录了Wane的2.66%-6.5%的下降。在SSP8.5下的适应性分析表明,延迟种植提高了Degem的产量,而晚熟品种更适合Degem和Fitche。然而,在Bishoftu,种植调整和品种选择都没有减轻产量损失,这强调了采用综合适应方法的必要性。未来的研究应纳入多模型比较、更广泛的适应方案和社会经济考虑,以确保气候变化下奥罗米亚中部的小麦可持续生产。
{"title":"Calibration and validation of the CERES-Wheat model in DSSAT to assess climate change impacts and adaptation options for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in central Oromia, Ethiopia","authors":"Seifu Kibebew,&nbsp;Nigussie Dechassa,&nbsp;Yibekal Alemayehu,&nbsp;Feyera Merga,&nbsp;Girma Megersa","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70238","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study calibrated and validated the Crop Environment Resource Synthesis-wheat model within Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptation strategies under various emission scenarios in Central Oromia, Ethiopia. Field data from three consecutive growing seasons (2021/22–2023/24) were used to calibrate the model's genetic coefficients, while 2024/25 data served for validation. Calibration results showed strong agreement with observed data, with normalized root mean square error RMSEn below 10% for all variables. Validation across stations produced <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values between 0.74 and 0.97 and RMSEn from 2.89% to 19.77%, confirming the model's reliability in simulating wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) growth and yield. Using the validated model, climate change impacts were evaluated under baseline (1991–2022) and future scenarios (SSP4.5 and SSP8.5 for the 2050s and 2080s). Simulations indicated notable cultivar- and location-specific yield responses, with most stations showing declines under SSP8.5 by the 2080s. At Degem, yield reductions of 9.75%–38.85% were projected for the <i>Triticum aestivum</i> L. ‘Wane’ cultivar under SSP8.5. Bishoftu showed declines for both Wane and Dendea, particularly under SSP8.5 in the 2080s, while Fitche recorded a 2.66%–6.5% decrease for Wane in the same period. Adaptation analysis under SSP8.5 revealed that delayed planting improved Wane performance at Degem, and late-maturing cultivars were better suited to Degem and Fitche. However, at Bishoftu, neither planting adjustments nor cultivar selection mitigated yield losses, underscoring the need for integrated adaptation approaches. Future studies should incorporate multi-model comparisons, broader adaptation options, and socioeconomic considerations to ensure sustainable wheat production in Central Oromia under climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Winter oilseeds show no detectable effect on soybean cyst nematode in Minnesota soybean–corn rotations 冬季油籽在大豆-玉米轮作中对大豆包囊线虫无显著影响
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70253
Cody Hoerning, Senyu Chen, Samantha Wells, Donald Wyse

Pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) and camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] are winter oilseed crops that can be implemented in cropping systems of the US Midwest region. Incorporating winter oilseed crops into the cropping system offers ecosystem and productivity benefits when the ground is otherwise fallow. However, adding a new crop into an established cropping system may increase pest or pathogen risk. Pennycress and camelina have been identified as a host and non-host, respectively, of the soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heterodera glycines), a devastating soybean pathogen. The objective of this experiment was to investigate whether adding winter pennycress or camelina to a soybean–corn rotation affected SCN population density. The experiment was a two-level facorial with a split-plot design that included SCN-susceptible and SCN-resistant soybean varieties as main plots and oilseed crops (pennycress, camelina, and fallow) as subplots conducted at three field locations in Minnesota. Throughout the study, the SCN-susceptible soybean treatment significantly increased SCN population density when compared to the SCN-resistant soybean treatment. There was no measurable effect on SCN population density when camelina or pennycress was included as a winter oilseed crop. The results indicate that camelina or pennycress can be grown as winter oilseed cover crops in the soybean–corn rotations without significant risk to soybean production concerning SCN in Minnesota.

pennyress (Thlaspi arvense)和camelina sativa (L.)Crantz]是冬季油籽作物,可以在美国中西部地区的种植系统中实施。当土地休耕时,将冬季油籽作物纳入种植系统可提供生态系统和生产力效益。然而,在已建立的种植系统中添加新作物可能会增加害虫或病原体的风险。pennyress和camelina分别被鉴定为大豆囊线虫(Heterodera glycines)的宿主和非宿主,这是一种破坏性的大豆病原体。本试验的目的是研究在大豆-玉米轮作中添加冬pennyweed或camelina是否影响SCN种群密度。该试验采用双水平分析法,采用分块设计,将scn敏感和抗scn的大豆品种作为主地块,油料作物(pennycrea、camelina和休耕地)作为子地块,在明尼苏达州的三个地点进行。在整个研究过程中,与抗SCN大豆处理相比,SCN敏感大豆处理显著增加了SCN种群密度。当将亚麻荠或pennycrea作为冬季油料作物时,对SCN种群密度没有可测量的影响。结果表明,在明尼苏达州大豆-玉米轮作中,可以种植亚麻荠或pennycrea作为冬季油料覆盖作物,对大豆生产没有显著的SCN风险。
{"title":"Winter oilseeds show no detectable effect on soybean cyst nematode in Minnesota soybean–corn rotations","authors":"Cody Hoerning,&nbsp;Senyu Chen,&nbsp;Samantha Wells,&nbsp;Donald Wyse","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pennycress (<i>Thlaspi arvense</i>) and camelina [<i>Camelina sativa</i> (L.) Crantz] are winter oilseed crops that can be implemented in cropping systems of the US Midwest region. Incorporating winter oilseed crops into the cropping system offers ecosystem and productivity benefits when the ground is otherwise fallow. However, adding a new crop into an established cropping system may increase pest or pathogen risk. Pennycress and camelina have been identified as a host and non-host, respectively, of the soybean cyst nematode (SCN, <i>Heterodera glycines</i>), a devastating soybean pathogen. The objective of this experiment was to investigate whether adding winter pennycress or camelina to a soybean–corn rotation affected SCN population density. The experiment was a two-level facorial with a split-plot design that included SCN-susceptible and SCN-resistant soybean varieties as main plots and oilseed crops (pennycress, camelina, and fallow) as subplots conducted at three field locations in Minnesota. Throughout the study, the SCN-susceptible soybean treatment significantly increased SCN population density when compared to the SCN-resistant soybean treatment. There was no measurable effect on SCN population density when camelina or pennycress was included as a winter oilseed crop. The results indicate that camelina or pennycress can be grown as winter oilseed cover crops in the soybean–corn rotations without significant risk to soybean production concerning SCN in Minnesota.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70253","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying maize yield potential and farm yield gaps in Southern Brazil 确定巴西南部玉米产量潜力和农业产量差距
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70258
Isabela Bulegon Pilecco, Leandro do Prado Ribeiro, Matheus Cavalheiro Moreira de Camargo, Cintia Piovesan Pegoraro, Álvaro De Souza Carnellosso, Nereu Augusto Streck, Alencar Junior Zanon

A comprehensive understanding of the interaction between genotype and environment at the local level, coupled with the development of effective management strategies, is imperative to meet the demand for maize (Zea mays) in Santa Catarina, Brazil, and elsewhere. This study estimated maize yield potential, water-limited yield potential, and yield gaps in the state. The study also identified the key biophysical and management factors contributing to yield gaps. The nine buffer zones selected encompass 63% of the total cultivated area dedicated to maize production. To ensure the appropriate balance between the quantity of data utilized and the representativeness of the study area, the Hybrid-Maize model and the method developed by the Global Yield Gap Atlas were employed. In the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 agricultural years, surveys were conducted in 293 fields. A comparative analysis between high and low yields, in conjunction with regression tree analyses, enables the identification of management practices that warrant investment to elevate average yields and approach values approximating 75% of water-limited yield potential. The results indicated that the yield potential of maize in Santa Catarina is 17.4 Mg ha−1, while the water-limited yield potential is 14.7 Mg ha−1. Therefore, the attainable yield gap was estimated to be 4.0 Mg ha−1. The primary management practices that constrain maize yield were identified, including the population of established plants, the rate of potassium fertilization, the sowing date, and the interval between lime applications. Improvements to these practices will enable an increase of 1.0 million Mg in the current crop area.

在地方一级全面了解基因型和环境之间的相互作用,并制定有效的管理战略,对于满足巴西圣卡塔琳娜州和其他地方对玉米(Zea mays)的需求至关重要。本研究估计了该州的玉米产量潜力、限水产量潜力和产量缺口。该研究还确定了造成产量差距的关键生物物理和管理因素。选定的9个缓冲区覆盖了玉米生产总耕地面积的63%。为了确保所利用的数据量与研究区域的代表性之间的适当平衡,采用杂交玉米模型和全球产量差距图集开发的方法。在2020-2021和2021-2022农业年,对293个农田进行了调查。高、低产量的比较分析,结合回归树分析,可以确定管理措施,保证投资提高平均产量,并接近75%的限水产量潜力。结果表明,圣卡塔琳娜玉米产量潜力为17.4 Mg ha−1,限水产量潜力为14.7 Mg ha−1。因此,可达到的产量缺口估计为4.0 Mg ha−1。确定了制约玉米产量的主要管理措施,包括建立植株的种群,钾肥的施用量,播种日期和石灰施用的间隔。这些做法的改进将使当前作物面积增加100万毫克。
{"title":"Identifying maize yield potential and farm yield gaps in Southern Brazil","authors":"Isabela Bulegon Pilecco,&nbsp;Leandro do Prado Ribeiro,&nbsp;Matheus Cavalheiro Moreira de Camargo,&nbsp;Cintia Piovesan Pegoraro,&nbsp;Álvaro De Souza Carnellosso,&nbsp;Nereu Augusto Streck,&nbsp;Alencar Junior Zanon","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70258","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comprehensive understanding of the interaction between genotype and environment at the local level, coupled with the development of effective management strategies, is imperative to meet the demand for maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) in Santa Catarina, Brazil, and elsewhere. This study estimated maize yield potential, water-limited yield potential, and yield gaps in the state. The study also identified the key biophysical and management factors contributing to yield gaps. The nine buffer zones selected encompass 63% of the total cultivated area dedicated to maize production. To ensure the appropriate balance between the quantity of data utilized and the representativeness of the study area, the Hybrid-Maize model and the method developed by the Global Yield Gap Atlas were employed. In the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 agricultural years, surveys were conducted in 293 fields. A comparative analysis between high and low yields, in conjunction with regression tree analyses, enables the identification of management practices that warrant investment to elevate average yields and approach values approximating 75% of water-limited yield potential. The results indicated that the yield potential of maize in Santa Catarina is 17.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, while the water-limited yield potential is 14.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Therefore, the attainable yield gap was estimated to be 4.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. The primary management practices that constrain maize yield were identified, including the population of established plants, the rate of potassium fertilization, the sowing date, and the interval between lime applications. Improvements to these practices will enable an increase of 1.0 million Mg in the current crop area.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70258","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Summer cover crop mixes: Part 2—Weed suppression and early cash crop performance 夏季覆盖作物混合:第2部分-杂草抑制和早期经济作物性能
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70236
Jodie M. McVane, Paul B. DeLaune, Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan

Cover crop mixes offer many benefits, including the management of herbicide-resistant weeds. In Southern cropping systems, summer mixes, planted after cash crop harvest and terminated by frost, can be valuable for effective weed management. In this 3-year study, four summer mixes were evaluated for their impact on weed suppression and the establishment of subsequent cash crops. Mix 1 had four grasses; mix 2 had two grasses, one legume, and one non-leguminous broadleaf; mix 3 had two grasses and two legumes; and mix 4 had two legumes and two non-leguminous broadleaves. Mixes 1, 2, and 3 produced the greatest biomass, thus offering the highest post-harvest weed suppression (>80% reduction in weed biomass) and moderate early-summer weed suppression, compared to fallow. The summer grasses sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor × S. bicolor var. sudanense) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) were effective contributors to biomass production and weed suppression. Mix 4, with no grass component, still had a 54% reduction in weed biomass compared to the weedy check control. The corn and grain sorghum planted into the terminated legume mix plots showed enhanced growth, with none of the mixes negatively impacting these cash crops. In mixes 2 and 3 that contained legumes, corn plants were 18% taller on average and had 29% greater early-season plant biomass than the weed-free check. Overall, the findings suggest that summer mixtures, particularly those dominated by grasses, provide substantial weed suppression, with grass–legume combinations offering additional benefits to early cash crop performance.

覆盖作物混合种植有很多好处,包括管理抗除草剂杂草。在南方的种植系统中,在经济作物收获后种植并因霜冻而终止的夏季混合种植对有效的杂草管理很有价值。在这项为期3年的研究中,评估了四种夏季混合对杂草抑制和后续经济作物建立的影响。Mix 1有四种草;混合2有两种草,一种豆科,一种非豆科阔叶;混合3有两种草和两种豆科植物;混合4有两个豆科阔叶和两个非豆科阔叶。与休耕相比,混合1、2和3产生的生物量最大,因此收获后杂草抑制最高(杂草生物量减少80%),初夏杂草抑制适度。夏草高粱-苏丹草(Sorghum - sudanense × S. bicolor var. sudanense)和珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucum L.)是有效的生物质生产和杂草抑制贡献者。与杂草对照相比,不含草成分的混合4的杂草生物量仍减少54%。将玉米和高粱种植在终止豆科作物混交地中,对这些经济作物的生长都有促进作用,没有任何一种混交地对这些经济作物产生负面影响。在含有豆类的混合2和混合3中,玉米植株比无杂草的混合2平均高18%,早季植物生物量比无杂草的混合3平均高29%。总的来说,研究结果表明,夏季混合,特别是那些以草为主的混合,提供了大量的杂草抑制,草-豆科植物组合为早期经济作物的表现提供了额外的好处。
{"title":"Summer cover crop mixes: Part 2—Weed suppression and early cash crop performance","authors":"Jodie M. McVane,&nbsp;Paul B. DeLaune,&nbsp;Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70236","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crop mixes offer many benefits, including the management of herbicide-resistant weeds. In Southern cropping systems, summer mixes, planted after cash crop harvest and terminated by frost, can be valuable for effective weed management. In this 3-year study, four summer mixes were evaluated for their impact on weed suppression and the establishment of subsequent cash crops. Mix 1 had four grasses; mix 2 had two grasses, one legume, and one non-leguminous broadleaf; mix 3 had two grasses and two legumes; and mix 4 had two legumes and two non-leguminous broadleaves. Mixes 1, 2, and 3 produced the greatest biomass, thus offering the highest post-harvest weed suppression (&gt;80% reduction in weed biomass) and moderate early-summer weed suppression, compared to fallow. The summer grasses sorghum-sudangrass (<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> × <i>S. bicolor</i> var<i>. sudanense</i>) and pearl millet (<i>Pennisetum glaucum</i> L.) were effective contributors to biomass production and weed suppression. Mix 4, with no grass component, still had a 54% reduction in weed biomass compared to the weedy check control. The corn and grain sorghum planted into the terminated legume mix plots showed enhanced growth, with none of the mixes negatively impacting these cash crops. In mixes 2 and 3 that contained legumes, corn plants were 18% taller on average and had 29% greater early-season plant biomass than the weed-free check. Overall, the findings suggest that summer mixtures, particularly those dominated by grasses, provide substantial weed suppression, with grass–legume combinations offering additional benefits to early cash crop performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nitrapyrin application at different topographic positions affects corn productivity and economic returns 在不同的地形位置施用硝吡啶影响玉米的生产力和经济效益
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70239
Pranay Kumar Kadari, Gurbir Singh, Kelly A. Nelson, Gurpreet Kaur, Adauto Rocha Junior

Nitrogen (N) use efficiency on claypan soils is often low; therefore, adopting effective management practices is crucial for increasing corn (Zea mays L.) productivity and maximizing economic returns. The objective of this 4-year field study (2019–2022) was to evaluate the impact of anhydrous ammonia (AA) with or without a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin) on corn productivity, grain quality, partial factor productivity (PFP), and economic returns across different topographic positions (shoulder, backslope, and footslope) within a landscape. Averaged over the years, AA + nitrapyrin treatment had over 6.4% yield advantage compared to AA alone. Grain N removal was 11 kg ha−1 higher and PFP was 3.6 units higher with AA + nitrapyrin compared to AA treatment. Although the expected net returns with nitrapyrin were lower at the footslope and higher at the shoulder position, the incremental yields, economic yield difference, and net economic gains at the footslope were consistently greater than those at the backslope and shoulder. Averaged over site-years, the footslope position generated higher net economic gains ($200.07 ha−1), which were $46.04 and $125.37 ha−1 higher than the backslope and shoulder positions, respectively. These findings emphasize the importance of site-specific N management with nitrapyrin for optimizing yields, enhancing nutrient use efficiency, and maximizing economic returns under varying landscapes.

粘土土氮素利用效率往往较低;因此,采取有效的管理措施对于提高玉米(Zea mays L.)生产力和实现经济回报最大化至关重要。这项为期4年的实地研究(2019-2022)旨在评估有无硝化抑制剂(nitrapyrin)的无水氨(AA)对景观中不同地形位置(肩坡、后坡和脚坡)的玉米生产力、谷物质量、部分要素生产率(PFP)和经济回报的影响。多年平均来看,AA + nitrapyrin处理比单独AA处理的产量优势超过6.4%。与AA处理相比,AA +硝霉素处理的籽粒氮去除率提高了11 kg ha - 1, PFP提高了3.6个单位。尽管施用硝吡林的预期净收益在坡脚较低,而在坡肩较高,但坡脚的增量产量、经济产量差和净经济收益始终大于坡背和坡肩。在站点年平均值上,脚坡位置产生了更高的净经济收益(200.07 ha - 1美元),分别比背坡和肩坡位置高46.04美元和125.37美元ha - 1。这些发现强调了在不同景观条件下,使用硝基吡啶进行特定地点氮素管理对于优化产量、提高养分利用效率和最大化经济回报的重要性。
{"title":"Nitrapyrin application at different topographic positions affects corn productivity and economic returns","authors":"Pranay Kumar Kadari,&nbsp;Gurbir Singh,&nbsp;Kelly A. Nelson,&nbsp;Gurpreet Kaur,&nbsp;Adauto Rocha Junior","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70239","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen (N) use efficiency on claypan soils is often low; therefore, adopting effective management practices is crucial for increasing corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) productivity and maximizing economic returns. The objective of this 4-year field study (2019–2022) was to evaluate the impact of anhydrous ammonia (AA) with or without a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin) on corn productivity, grain quality, partial factor productivity (PFP), and economic returns across different topographic positions (shoulder, backslope, and footslope) within a landscape. Averaged over the years, AA + nitrapyrin treatment had over 6.4% yield advantage compared to AA alone. Grain N removal was 11 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> higher and PFP was 3.6 units higher with AA + nitrapyrin compared to AA treatment. Although the expected net returns with nitrapyrin were lower at the footslope and higher at the shoulder position, the incremental yields, economic yield difference, and net economic gains at the footslope were consistently greater than those at the backslope and shoulder. Averaged over site-years, the footslope position generated higher net economic gains ($200.07 ha<sup>−1</sup>), which were $46.04 and $125.37 ha<sup>−1</sup> higher than the backslope and shoulder positions, respectively. These findings emphasize the importance of site-specific N management with nitrapyrin for optimizing yields, enhancing nutrient use efficiency, and maximizing economic returns under varying landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the stability and plasticity of rice quality traits through reaction norms on environmental covariates 利用环境协变量反应规范评价水稻品质性状的稳定性和可塑性
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70227
Kajal Gupta, Brijesh Angira, Adam Famoso, Roberto Fritsche-Neto

We applied the reaction norm concept to assess the stability and plasticity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain quality traits, specifically for whole milling, chalk, and length. For that, we used 15 days of planting trials from 2021 and 2022, which included 19 commercial varieties evaluated in randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis was conducted in two phases: first, we obtained adjusted means for each line in each trial, followed by a joint analysis to calculate broad-sense heritability and genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction. Next, we used Finlay–Wilkinson's regression, genotype-genotype × enviroment (GGE) biplot, and environmental covariates to dissect the G × E. All analyses were performed in R using SpATS, sommer, statgenGxE, metan, EnvRtpe, caret, and snpReady packages. Furthermore, to better understand the G × E effect, we employed linear and exponential regression models. Our results revealed a higher G × E interaction for whole milling and chalk, while grain length showed a lower interaction. Notably, the specific planting days were more critical for quality traits than planting windows. We identified key environmental covariates: potential evapotranspiration and relative humidity from pre-flowering to flowering for whole milling; vapor pressure deficit and relative humidity from flowering to post-flowering for chalk; and wind speed, potential evapotranspiration, and relative temperature anomaly during various growth stages for grain length. These covariates explained ∼76% of the total variation in these traits. Reaction norm curves provided insights into genotype-specific responses to environmental factors, and the narrow-sense heritability of reaction norm components (intercept and slope) revealed “new” heritable traits to be used for stability and adaptability selection.

应用反应范数概念评价水稻籽粒品质性状的稳定性和可塑性,特别是全碾磨、白垩和长度。为此,我们在2021年和2022年进行了15天的种植试验,其中包括19个商业品种,采用随机完全区组设计进行评估,有3个重复。分析分两个阶段进行:首先,我们得到每个试验中每个品系的校正均值,然后进行联合分析,计算广义遗传力和基因型-环境(G × E)互作。接下来,我们使用Finlay-Wilkinson回归、基因型-基因型×环境(GGE)双图和环境协变量来剖析gx e。所有分析都使用SpATS、sommer、statgenGxE、meta、EnvRtpe、caret和snready软件包在R中进行。此外,为了更好地理解G × E效应,我们采用了线性和指数回归模型。结果表明,磨粒和白垩粉的G × E相互作用较高,而晶粒长度的G × E相互作用较低。具体植树日比植树窗对品质性状的影响更为关键。我们确定了关键的环境协变量:开花前到开花期间的潜在蒸散量和相对湿度;白垩花开花至花后的蒸汽压差和相对湿度;籽粒生长各阶段风速、潜在蒸散量和相对温度的距平。这些协变量解释了这些性状中约76%的总变异。反应范数曲线揭示了基因型对环境因子的特异性反应,反应范数分量(截距和斜率)的狭义遗传力揭示了“新的”遗传性状,可用于稳定性和适应性选择。
{"title":"Assessing the stability and plasticity of rice quality traits through reaction norms on environmental covariates","authors":"Kajal Gupta,&nbsp;Brijesh Angira,&nbsp;Adam Famoso,&nbsp;Roberto Fritsche-Neto","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70227","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We applied the reaction norm concept to assess the stability and plasticity of rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) grain quality traits, specifically for whole milling, chalk, and length. For that, we used 15 days of planting trials from 2021 and 2022, which included 19 commercial varieties evaluated in randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis was conducted in two phases: first, we obtained adjusted means for each line in each trial, followed by a joint analysis to calculate broad-sense heritability and genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction. Next, we used Finlay–Wilkinson's regression, genotype-genotype × enviroment (GGE) biplot, and environmental covariates to dissect the G × E. All analyses were performed in R using SpATS, sommer, statgenGxE, metan, EnvRtpe, caret, and snpReady packages. Furthermore, to better understand the G × E effect, we employed linear and exponential regression models. Our results revealed a higher G × E interaction for whole milling and chalk, while grain length showed a lower interaction. Notably, the specific planting days were more critical for quality traits than planting windows. We identified key environmental covariates: potential evapotranspiration and relative humidity from pre-flowering to flowering for whole milling; vapor pressure deficit and relative humidity from flowering to post-flowering for chalk; and wind speed, potential evapotranspiration, and relative temperature anomaly during various growth stages for grain length. These covariates explained ∼76% of the total variation in these traits. Reaction norm curves provided insights into genotype-specific responses to environmental factors, and the narrow-sense heritability of reaction norm components (intercept and slope) revealed “new” heritable traits to be used for stability and adaptability selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70227","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-statured maize, past challenges and future prospects: A systematic review 矮个子玉米,过去的挑战和未来的前景:系统综述
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70218
Alex S. Wassgren, Pratishtha Poudel, Sylvie M. Brouder, Daniel J. Quinn, Jeffrey J. Volenec

Despite improvements to grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.) during the Green Revolution, maize remained predominantly tall unlike other major cereals such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Although short-statured maize (SSM) has been a topic of interest for many decades, historical efforts to introduce it commercially have remained unsuccessful. Commercial interest in SSM has recently returned mainly due to their lodging resistance, potential for high-density planting, and better in-season accessibility for pest and disease management. In this article, we conduct a systematic review to examine the limitations of past SSM hybrids in regard to genetic backgrounds and traits associated with agronomic performance, and renewed interest in SSM. Our objectives are to (i) identify the limiting factors of early SSM to understand why maize lagged behind in adopting dwarf traits compared to other cereal crops, and (ii) analyze the drivers behind renewed interest in SSM to assess its agronomic significance and potential role in future crop improvement strategies. This study analyses 45 studies and 17 patents and patent applications published between 1965 and 2024. Linear regression models were used to analyze changes in yield, height, harvest index, and lodging over time in both short and tall hybrids. Based on our review results, traits used to reduce height in maize introduced undesirable defects in plant reproductive development and architecture in early SSM hybrids. Modern improvements in SSM hybrid performance are due to less severe dwarfing traits or through concentrating trait effects away from reproductive structures.

尽管在绿色革命期间玉米(Zea mays L.)的产量有所提高,但与小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)和水稻(Oryza sativa L.)等其他主要谷物不同,玉米仍然以高为主。尽管矮小型玉米(SSM)几十年来一直是人们感兴趣的话题,但历史上将其商业化的努力仍然不成功。最近,对SSM的商业兴趣又回来了,主要是因为它们具有抗倒伏性,高密度种植的潜力,以及更好的季节性病虫害管理。在这篇文章中,我们对过去SSM杂交种在遗传背景和与农艺性能相关的性状方面的局限性进行了系统的回顾,并重新燃起了对SSM的兴趣。我们的目标是:(i)确定早期SSM的限制因素,以了解为什么玉米在采用矮秆性状方面落后于其他谷类作物;(ii)分析SSM重新引起关注背后的驱动因素,以评估其农艺意义和在未来作物改良策略中的潜在作用。本研究分析了1965年至2024年间发表的45项研究和17项专利和专利申请。采用线性回归模型分析了矮、高杂交种的产量、高度、收获指数和倒伏随时间的变化。根据我们的综述结果,用于降低玉米高度的性状在早期SSM杂交种中引入了植物生殖发育和结构上的不良缺陷。SSM杂交性能的现代改进是由于不太严重的矮化性状或通过集中性状效应远离生殖结构。
{"title":"Short-statured maize, past challenges and future prospects: A systematic review","authors":"Alex S. Wassgren,&nbsp;Pratishtha Poudel,&nbsp;Sylvie M. Brouder,&nbsp;Daniel J. Quinn,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Volenec","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70218","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite improvements to grain yield in maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) during the Green Revolution, maize remained predominantly tall unlike other major cereals such as wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) and rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.). Although short-statured maize (SSM) has been a topic of interest for many decades, historical efforts to introduce it commercially have remained unsuccessful. Commercial interest in SSM has recently returned mainly due to their lodging resistance, potential for high-density planting, and better in-season accessibility for pest and disease management. In this article, we conduct a systematic review to examine the limitations of past SSM hybrids in regard to genetic backgrounds and traits associated with agronomic performance, and renewed interest in SSM. Our objectives are to (i) identify the limiting factors of early SSM to understand why maize lagged behind in adopting dwarf traits compared to other cereal crops, and (ii) analyze the drivers behind renewed interest in SSM to assess its agronomic significance and potential role in future crop improvement strategies. This study analyses 45 studies and 17 patents and patent applications published between 1965 and 2024. Linear regression models were used to analyze changes in yield, height, harvest index, and lodging over time in both short and tall hybrids. Based on our review results, traits used to reduce height in maize introduced undesirable defects in plant reproductive development and architecture in early SSM hybrids. Modern improvements in SSM hybrid performance are due to less severe dwarfing traits or through concentrating trait effects away from reproductive structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70218","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An economic, environmental, and social analysis of autonomous mechanical weeding in sugar beet farming 甜菜种植中自动除草的经济、环境和社会分析
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70246
Elias Maritan, Olivia Spykman, James Lowenberg-DeBoer, Markus Gandorfer, Karl Behrendt

Weeding robots are expected to decrease herbicide use on conventional farms and reduce manual labor on organic farms. A multi-objective linear programming model was used to compare the economic, environmental, and social performance of robotic and non-robotic weed control in conventional and organic sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) production in Bavaria, Germany. On the conventional farm, the weeding robot generated a mean gross return of €58,612 year−1 compared to €57,728 year−1 when using herbicide spraying. However, the mean return on total costs for the weeding robot was negative (€−2750 year−1) and substantially lower than the €8663 year−1 achieved with herbicide spraying. In organic farming, this technology was more profitable than non-robotic mechanical weeding, generating a mean gross return of €73,098 year−1 and a mean return on total costs of €10,373 year−1. The corresponding figures for non-robotic mechanical weeding were € 59,176 and €7,577 year−1. The carbon emission intensity of sugar beet was comparable between weed control strategies on the conventional farm and marginally lower for robotic weeding on the organic farm. On both farms, autonomous mechanical weeding used more skilled labor due to routine supervision, field-to-field transport, and human intervention requirements. Higher skilled labor time with robotics negatively affected farmers’ work–life balance. Investment cost, supervision and human intervention requirements, technology specialization, and logistics of field operations were identified as the main barriers to adoption of the tested weeding robot. These barriers should be prioritized when developing future autonomous farm equipment.

除草机器人有望减少传统农场除草剂的使用,减少有机农场的体力劳动。采用多目标线性规划模型比较了德国巴伐利亚州传统甜菜和有机甜菜生产中机器人和非机器人杂草控制的经济、环境和社会绩效。在传统农场,除草机器人产生的平均总回报为58,612欧元,而使用除草剂喷洒的平均总回报为57,728欧元。然而,除草机器人的平均总成本回报率为负(2750欧元/年),大大低于喷洒除草剂的8663欧元/年。在有机农业中,该技术比非机器人机械除草更有利可图,平均总回报为73,098欧元,平均总成本回报为10,373欧元。非机器人机械除草的相应数字为59,176欧元和7,577欧元。传统农田的杂草控制策略与有机农场的机器人除草策略相比,甜菜的碳排放强度相当,略低。在这两个农场,由于日常监督、田间运输和人工干预要求,自动机械除草需要更多的熟练劳动力。使用机器人技术的高技能劳动时间对农民的工作与生活平衡产生了负面影响。投资成本、监督和人为干预要求、技术专业化以及现场作业的物流被认为是采用测试除草机器人的主要障碍。在开发未来的自主农场设备时,应该优先考虑这些障碍。
{"title":"An economic, environmental, and social analysis of autonomous mechanical weeding in sugar beet farming","authors":"Elias Maritan,&nbsp;Olivia Spykman,&nbsp;James Lowenberg-DeBoer,&nbsp;Markus Gandorfer,&nbsp;Karl Behrendt","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70246","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Weeding robots are expected to decrease herbicide use on conventional farms and reduce manual labor on organic farms. A multi-objective linear programming model was used to compare the economic, environmental, and social performance of robotic and non-robotic weed control in conventional and organic sugar beet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.) production in Bavaria, Germany. On the conventional farm, the weeding robot generated a mean gross return of €58,612 year<sup>−1</sup> compared to €57,728 year<sup>−1</sup> when using herbicide spraying. However, the mean return on total costs for the weeding robot was negative (€−2750 year<sup>−1</sup>) and substantially lower than the €8663 year<sup>−1</sup> achieved with herbicide spraying. In organic farming, this technology was more profitable than non-robotic mechanical weeding, generating a mean gross return of €73,098 year<sup>−1</sup> and a mean return on total costs of €10,373 year<sup>−1</sup>. The corresponding figures for non-robotic mechanical weeding were € 59,176 and €7,577 year<sup>−1</sup>. The carbon emission intensity of sugar beet was comparable between weed control strategies on the conventional farm and marginally lower for robotic weeding on the organic farm. On both farms, autonomous mechanical weeding used more skilled labor due to routine supervision, field-to-field transport, and human intervention requirements. Higher skilled labor time with robotics negatively affected farmers’ work–life balance. Investment cost, supervision and human intervention requirements, technology specialization, and logistics of field operations were identified as the main barriers to adoption of the tested weeding robot. These barriers should be prioritized when developing future autonomous farm equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agronomy Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1