首页 > 最新文献

Agronomy Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Contrasting fertilizer nitrogen contribution rates for achieving maximum grain yield in double- and single-cropped rice 双季稻与单季稻氮肥贡献率的比较研究
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70235
Wenjie Zi, Jiana Chen, Fangbo Cao, Huabin Zheng, Weiqin Wang, Min Huang

The contribution rate of fertilizer nitrogen (N)—defined as the percentage of N uptake from fertilizer relative to total N uptake—is a fundamental parameter for establishing knowledge-based fertilization recommendations in crop production. This study aimed to compare the fertilizer N contribution rate for achieving maximum grain yield between double- and single-cropped rice (Oryza sativa L.). Data from four field experiments conducted between 2014 and 2023 were used to analyze the relationships of fertilizer N contribution rate and grain yield with N application rate in both double- and single-cropped rice, thereby estimating the fertilizer N contribution rate required to achieve maximum grain yield. The results showed that the fertilizer N contribution rate increased by 3.21%–3.58% and 1.92%–2.35% for each 10 kg ha−1 increase in N application rate in double- and single-cropped rice, respectively. Maximum grain yields were achieved at N application rates of 190–208 kg ha−1 per crop for double-cropped rice and 211–244 kg ha−1 for single-cropped rice. Correspondingly, the fertilizer N contribution rates for achieving maximum grain yield ranged from 60.91% to 74.51% in double-cropped rice and from 46.90% to 49.65% in single-cropped rice. These results indicate that N fertilizers contribute more to grain yield in double- than in single-cropped rice, underscoring the importance of developing N management strategies and policies tailored to specific rice cropping systems.

肥料氮的贡献率——定义为肥料吸收氮占总氮吸收的百分比——是在作物生产中建立基于知识的施肥建议的基本参数。本研究旨在比较单季稻和双季稻籽粒产量最高的氮肥贡献率。利用2014 - 2023年4个大田试验数据,分析双季稻和单季稻施氮量与氮肥贡献率和籽粒产量的关系,从而估算出实现籽粒最大产量所需的氮肥贡献率。结果表明,双季稻和单季稻每增加10 kg ha - 1施氮量,氮肥贡献率分别提高3.21% ~ 3.58%和1.92% ~ 2.35%。双季稻施氮量为190 ~ 208 kg ha - 1,单季稻施氮量为211 ~ 244 kg ha - 1时,籽粒产量最高。相应的,双季稻和单季稻实现籽粒最高产量的氮肥贡献率分别为60.91% ~ 74.51%和46.90% ~ 49.65%。这些结果表明,氮肥对双季稻产量的贡献大于单季稻,强调了制定适合特定水稻种植制度的氮肥管理策略和政策的重要性。
{"title":"Contrasting fertilizer nitrogen contribution rates for achieving maximum grain yield in double- and single-cropped rice","authors":"Wenjie Zi,&nbsp;Jiana Chen,&nbsp;Fangbo Cao,&nbsp;Huabin Zheng,&nbsp;Weiqin Wang,&nbsp;Min Huang","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70235","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The contribution rate of fertilizer nitrogen (N)—defined as the percentage of N uptake from fertilizer relative to total N uptake—is a fundamental parameter for establishing knowledge-based fertilization recommendations in crop production. This study aimed to compare the fertilizer N contribution rate for achieving maximum grain yield between double- and single-cropped rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.). Data from four field experiments conducted between 2014 and 2023 were used to analyze the relationships of fertilizer N contribution rate and grain yield with N application rate in both double- and single-cropped rice, thereby estimating the fertilizer N contribution rate required to achieve maximum grain yield. The results showed that the fertilizer N contribution rate increased by 3.21%–3.58% and 1.92%–2.35% for each 10 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> increase in N application rate in double- and single-cropped rice, respectively. Maximum grain yields were achieved at N application rates of 190–208 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> per crop for double-cropped rice and 211–244 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for single-cropped rice. Correspondingly, the fertilizer N contribution rates for achieving maximum grain yield ranged from 60.91% to 74.51% in double-cropped rice and from 46.90% to 49.65% in single-cropped rice. These results indicate that N fertilizers contribute more to grain yield in double- than in single-cropped rice, underscoring the importance of developing N management strategies and policies tailored to specific rice cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145572465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Planting corn at high-speed increased stand variability but did not affect yield 高速种植玉米增加了林分变异性,但不影响产量
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70220
Oluwaseyi E. Olomitutu, Jagman Dhillon, J. Wes Lowe, Corey J. Bryant, Erick J. Larson, Jialin Zhang, John Wallace, Jacob Meadows, Grant Shavers, Tucker Hilyer, Oluwafemi Oyedele, Michael J. Mulvaney

Timely planting and uniform stands are prerequisites for optimal corn (Zea mays L.) production. However, frequent rainfall often limits corn acreage planted in the southeast region of the United States. Planting faster might offer a potential solution as new technology claims up to 19 km h−1 planting speeds without sacrificing seed singulation or yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate corn response to varying planting speeds in Mississippi. Trials were arranged as a randomized complete block design during the 2023 and 2024 cropping seasons. A precision planter (John Deere bar and MaxEmerge 2 row units retrofitted with Ag Leader SureSpeed and SureForce) was tested at 9.7, 14.5, and 17.7 km h−1 actual ground speeds. A mechanical planter (John Deere 1700 ground-driven planter equipped with eSet meters) at 9.7 km h−1 was used as a standard check. Corn hybrid DKC 70-27 was planted at 81,800 and 85,000 seeds ha−1 in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In both seasons, increased planting speed generally lowered plant population and quality of seed placement with increased skips and spacing variability. Planting at 14.5 km h−1 optimized precision and reduced multiples using the precision planter. Moreover, planting speed beyond 14.5 km h−1 did not affect corn yield. The precision planter at 17.7 km h−1 exhibited improved performance over the mechanical planter at 9.7 km h−1, particularly in maintaining lower miss and multiple indices. Using this technology, Mississippi corn producers can plant more land within the critical planting window at higher speeds without affecting yield.

及时种植和均匀立地是玉米(Zea mays L.)高产的先决条件。然而,频繁的降雨常常限制了美国东南部地区的玉米种植面积。更快的播种速度可能是一种潜在的解决方案,因为新技术声称在不牺牲种子单一或产量的情况下,播种速度可达19 km h - 1。本研究的目的是评价玉米对密西西比州不同种植速度的反应。试验在2023年和2024年种植季采用随机完全区组设计。在9.7、14.5和17.7 km h−1的实际地面速度下,测试了一种精密种植机(John Deere bar和MaxEmerge 2行装置,改装了Ag Leader SureSpeed和SureForce)。使用9.7 km h - 1的机械播种机(John Deere 1700地面驱动播种机,配备eSet仪表)作为标准检查。玉米杂交种DKC 70-27分别于2023年和2024年以81800和85000粒/公顷的播种量播种。在这两个季节,播种速度的提高普遍降低了植物种群和播种质量,并增加了跳跃和间距变异。种植在14.5 km h−1优化精度和减少倍数使用精密播种机。当种植速度超过14.5 km h−1时,玉米产量不受影响。17.7 km h−1的精密播种机比9.7 km h−1的机械播种机表现出更好的性能,特别是在保持较低的脱靶率和多个指标方面。使用这项技术,密西西比州的玉米生产者可以在关键的种植窗口内以更快的速度种植更多的土地,而不会影响产量。
{"title":"Planting corn at high-speed increased stand variability but did not affect yield","authors":"Oluwaseyi E. Olomitutu,&nbsp;Jagman Dhillon,&nbsp;J. Wes Lowe,&nbsp;Corey J. Bryant,&nbsp;Erick J. Larson,&nbsp;Jialin Zhang,&nbsp;John Wallace,&nbsp;Jacob Meadows,&nbsp;Grant Shavers,&nbsp;Tucker Hilyer,&nbsp;Oluwafemi Oyedele,&nbsp;Michael J. Mulvaney","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70220","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Timely planting and uniform stands are prerequisites for optimal corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production. However, frequent rainfall often limits corn acreage planted in the southeast region of the United States. Planting faster might offer a potential solution as new technology claims up to 19 km h<sup>−1</sup> planting speeds without sacrificing seed singulation or yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate corn response to varying planting speeds in Mississippi. Trials were arranged as a randomized complete block design during the 2023 and 2024 cropping seasons. A precision planter (John Deere bar and MaxEmerge 2 row units retrofitted with Ag Leader SureSpeed and SureForce) was tested at 9.7, 14.5, and 17.7 km h<sup>−1</sup> actual ground speeds. A mechanical planter (John Deere 1700 ground-driven planter equipped with eSet meters) at 9.7 km h<sup>−1</sup> was used as a standard check. Corn hybrid DKC 70-27 was planted at 81,800 and 85,000 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In both seasons, increased planting speed generally lowered plant population and quality of seed placement with increased skips and spacing variability. Planting at 14.5 km h<sup>−1</sup> optimized precision and reduced multiples using the precision planter. Moreover, planting speed beyond 14.5 km h<sup>−1</sup> did not affect corn yield. The precision planter at 17.7 km h<sup>−1</sup> exhibited improved performance over the mechanical planter at 9.7 km h<sup>−1</sup>, particularly in maintaining lower miss and multiple indices. Using this technology, Mississippi corn producers can plant more land within the critical planting window at higher speeds without affecting yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70220","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145572466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Irrigation frequency and mowing height influence annual bluegrass in perennial ryegrass 灌溉频率和刈割高度对多年生黑麦草的一年生蓝草有影响
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70232
Brandon C. McNally, Matthew T. Elmore, Alexander R. Kowalewski, Emily T. Braithwaite, Alyssa B. Cain

Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is a winter annual weed with limited herbicide control options in cool-season turfgrasses. This research evaluated the effect of irrigation frequency and mowing height on annual bluegrass cover in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in 2019 and 2020 on a 3-year-old mixed stand in “North Brunswick, NJ.” Treatments were arranged in a 2-by-2 factorial in a randomized split-plot design with mowing height (11 or 38 mm) as the main plot and irrigation frequency (once or thrice week−1) as subplot. From June to October each year, both irrigation frequency treatments were irrigated to 60% reference evapotranspiration minus rainfall. Soil volumetric water content was consistently lower in once week−1 irrigation treatments in both years. Annual bluegrass cover was affected by irrigation frequency and mowing height, but no interaction was detected. In October, annual bluegrass cover was reduced (47%) in once week−1 treatments compared to thrice week−1 treatments (59%). Additionally, annual bluegrass cover in October was reduced in treatments mown at 38 mm (46%) compared to 11 mm (60%). Irrigation frequency had no effect on turfgrass quality, green cover, or normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); however, mowing height affected these response variables. When differences were present, all values were greater in the higher mown treatments. This research suggests reducing irrigation frequency reduces annual bluegrass cover without affecting turfgrass quality, green cover, or NDVI in the humid subtropical climate (near the Humid Continental climate zone). Additionally, increasing mowing height will reduce annual bluegrass cover.

一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.)是一种冬季一年生杂草,在寒冷季节的草坪草中,除草剂控制选择有限。本研究评估了灌溉频率和刈割高度对“North Brunswick, n.j”一个3年生混交林2019年和2020年多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)年蓝草覆盖的影响。处理按2 × 2因子随机分畦设计,割草高度(11或38 mm)为主畦,灌溉频率(每周一次或三次- 1)为次畦。每年6 ~ 10月,两种灌溉频率处理均灌溉至参考蒸散量减去降雨量的60%。两年内1周−1次灌溉处理土壤体积含水量均较低。灌水频率和刈割高度对蓝草年复盖度有影响,但无交互作用。10月,1周处理的蓝草年复盖面积(47%)比3周处理的(59%)减少。此外,10月份的蓝草年覆盖面积在刈割38毫米(46%)的处理下比在刈割11毫米(60%)的处理下减少。灌溉频率对草坪草质量、绿化覆盖度和归一化植被指数(NDVI)没有影响;而刈割高度对这些响应变量有影响。当存在差异时,所有值在刈割程度较高的处理中都较大。该研究表明,在湿润的亚热带气候(靠近湿润大陆气候带)中,减少灌溉频率会减少蓝草的年覆盖,但不会影响草坪草质量、绿化覆盖或NDVI。此外,增加修剪高度将减少每年的蓝草覆盖。
{"title":"Irrigation frequency and mowing height influence annual bluegrass in perennial ryegrass","authors":"Brandon C. McNally,&nbsp;Matthew T. Elmore,&nbsp;Alexander R. Kowalewski,&nbsp;Emily T. Braithwaite,&nbsp;Alyssa B. Cain","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70232","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) is a winter annual weed with limited herbicide control options in cool-season turfgrasses. This research evaluated the effect of irrigation frequency and mowing height on annual bluegrass cover in perennial ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L.) in 2019 and 2020 on a 3-year-old mixed stand in “North Brunswick, NJ.” Treatments were arranged in a 2-by-2 factorial in a randomized split-plot design with mowing height (11 or 38 mm) as the main plot and irrigation frequency (once or thrice week<sup>−1</sup>) as subplot. From June to October each year, both irrigation frequency treatments were irrigated to 60% reference evapotranspiration minus rainfall. Soil volumetric water content was consistently lower in once week<sup>−1</sup> irrigation treatments in both years. Annual bluegrass cover was affected by irrigation frequency and mowing height, but no interaction was detected. In October, annual bluegrass cover was reduced (47%) in once week<sup>−1</sup> treatments compared to thrice week<sup>−1</sup> treatments (59%). Additionally, annual bluegrass cover in October was reduced in treatments mown at 38 mm (46%) compared to 11 mm (60%). Irrigation frequency had no effect on turfgrass quality, green cover, or normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); however, mowing height affected these response variables. When differences were present, all values were greater in the higher mown treatments. This research suggests reducing irrigation frequency reduces annual bluegrass cover without affecting turfgrass quality, green cover, or NDVI in the humid subtropical climate (near the Humid Continental climate zone). Additionally, increasing mowing height will reduce annual bluegrass cover.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70232","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seeding ratios and Kentucky bluegrass effects on tall fescue sod strength 播种率和蓝草对高羊茅草皮强度的影响
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70209
Emmanuel U. Nwachukwu, Jack D. Fry, Jacob C. Domenghini, Ross C. Braun

Sodding is a method that provides immediate turfgrass cover and reduces the soil erosion potential at renovated sites. Because of its rhizomatous growth habit, Kentucky bluegrass (KB) (Poa pratensis L.) produces high-quality sod strength; however, tall fescue (TF) (Festuca arundinacea Shred.) is growing in popularity because of its superior heat and drought tolerance. The bunch-type growth habit of TF can result in weak sod strength and handling, which often requires plastic netting or the addition of KB at planting to improve sod strength during harvest and transplanting. Sod producers need more information on seeding ratios and classifications of KB when mixed with TF. Multiple field experiments in Kansas were conducted to evaluate the influence of seed mixture ratios (97:3, 95:5, and 90:10 w/w TF:KB) and KB classifications or growth aggressiveness labels on establishment speed, sod strength (maximum tensile strength and required work to tear), and sod handling (1–5 scale) at three harvests; 9, 10, and 12 months after planting. Experiment 1 results indicated 95:5 (w/w) TF:KB sod mixtures yielded similar establishment speed and sod strength across multiple harvests (12.1–15.9 N-m required work to tear sod), regardless of cultivar. Experiment 2 revealed some 95:5 and 90:10 (w/w) of TF:KB sod mixtures produced higher maximum tensile strength compared to 100% TF, but all 97:3 mixture ratios were similar in sod strength and established as quickly as 100% TF sod. Results will assist sod producers and turfgrass practitioners with information when mixing KB with TF for commercial sod.

铺草皮是一种提供即时草坪草覆盖并减少修复场地土壤侵蚀潜力的方法。由于其根状生长习惯,肯塔基蓝草(KB) (Poa pratensis L.)产生高质量的草皮强度;然而,高羊茅(TF) (Festuca arundinacea Shred.)由于其优越的耐热性和耐旱性而越来越受欢迎。TF的束型生长习惯会导致草皮强度和处理能力较弱,通常需要在种植时施用塑料网或添加KB来提高收获和移栽期间的草皮强度。当与TF混合使用时,Sod生产者需要更多关于种子率和KB分类的信息。在堪萨斯州进行了多次田间试验,以评估三次收获时种子混合比例(97:3、95:5和90:10 w/w TF:KB)和KB分类或生长侵略性标签对建立速度、草皮强度(最大抗拉强度和所需工作量)和草皮处理(1-5标度)的影响;种植后9、10、12个月。试验1的结果表明,在不同的品种中,95:5 (w/w)的TF:KB混合草皮在多次收获(12.1-15.9 N-m撕裂草皮所需的劳动)中产生相似的建立速度和草皮强度。实验2显示,与100% TF相比,95:5和90:10 (w/w)比例的TF:KB混合的sod产生的最大抗拉强度更高,但所有97:3的混合比例的sod强度相似,并且与100% TF的sod建立速度一样快。结果将有助于草皮生产商和草皮从业者在将KB与TF混合用于商业草皮时提供信息。
{"title":"Seeding ratios and Kentucky bluegrass effects on tall fescue sod strength","authors":"Emmanuel U. Nwachukwu,&nbsp;Jack D. Fry,&nbsp;Jacob C. Domenghini,&nbsp;Ross C. Braun","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70209","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sodding is a method that provides immediate turfgrass cover and reduces the soil erosion potential at renovated sites. Because of its rhizomatous growth habit, Kentucky bluegrass (KB) (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L.) produces high-quality sod strength; however, tall fescue (TF) (<i>Festuca arundinacea</i> Shred.) is growing in popularity because of its superior heat and drought tolerance. The bunch-type growth habit of TF can result in weak sod strength and handling, which often requires plastic netting or the addition of KB at planting to improve sod strength during harvest and transplanting. Sod producers need more information on seeding ratios and classifications of KB when mixed with TF. Multiple field experiments in Kansas were conducted to evaluate the influence of seed mixture ratios (97:3, 95:5, and 90:10 w/w TF:KB) and KB classifications or growth aggressiveness labels on establishment speed, sod strength (maximum tensile strength and required work to tear), and sod handling (1–5 scale) at three harvests; 9, 10, and 12 months after planting. Experiment 1 results indicated 95:5 (w/w) TF:KB sod mixtures yielded similar establishment speed and sod strength across multiple harvests (12.1–15.9 N-m required work to tear sod), regardless of cultivar. Experiment 2 revealed some 95:5 and 90:10 (w/w) of TF:KB sod mixtures produced higher maximum tensile strength compared to 100% TF, but all 97:3 mixture ratios were similar in sod strength and established as quickly as 100% TF sod. Results will assist sod producers and turfgrass practitioners with information when mixing KB with TF for commercial sod.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70209","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145469475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potato production in the United States: Two-decade update and future sustainable pathways 美国马铃薯生产:二十年更新和未来可持续发展之路
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70213
Isaac Kwadwo Mpanga, Russell Tronstad, Omololu John Idowu, Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe, Eric Koomson

In the United States, agriculture accounts for approximately 10% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including contributions from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production, a staple crop in the American diet. However, limited research has focused on recent trends in US potato production, particularly the contribution of different agricultural inputs and their role in GHG emissions. This study analyzes trends in US potato production using over two decades (1999/2000–2022) of annual survey data from the United States Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistical Service. Key areas of analysis include planted and harvested area, yields, total and unit sale prices, and input usage. The data are further used to estimate GHG from potato production through the Cool Farm Tool for 2000 and 2022. Our findings reveal a 34% and 32% decline in planted and harvested area, respectively, alongside a 22% reduction in total production across all market segments. Notably, yield increased by 15% in 2022 compared to 2000. The overall decrease in potato production aligns with sharp increases in unit price and total potato sales after adjusting for inflation, which rose by 54% and 20%, respectively. Inputs such as nitrogen, phosphorus, herbicides, and insecticides showed consistent reductions in per-hectare and total annual application, whereas potassium and fungicide usage increased. Yield improvements and reduced input usage led to a 39% decrease in total estimated emissions and a 20% reduction in emissions intensity by 2022 compared to 2000. The study highlights site-specific nutrient management and technologies like low-emission fertilizers, renewable energy, carbon sequestration practices, and breeding as future investment priorities.

在美国,农业约占温室气体排放总量的10%,其中包括马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum L.)生产的贡献,马铃薯是美国人饮食中的主要作物。然而,有限的研究集中在美国马铃薯生产的最新趋势上,特别是不同农业投入的贡献及其在温室气体排放中的作用。本研究利用美国农业部/国家农业统计局的二十多年(1999/2000-2022)年度调查数据分析了美国马铃薯生产的趋势。分析的关键领域包括种植和收获面积、产量、总销售价格和单位销售价格以及投入使用情况。这些数据进一步用于通过Cool Farm Tool估算2000年和2022年马铃薯生产产生的温室气体。我们的研究结果显示,种植面积和收获面积分别下降了34%和32%,所有细分市场的总产量减少了22%。值得注意的是,2022年的产量比2000年增加了15%。土豆产量的总体下降与经通货膨胀调整后的土豆单价和总销量的大幅增长相一致,后者分别增长了54%和20%。氮、磷、除草剂和杀虫剂等投入物每公顷和年总施用量持续减少,而钾和杀菌剂使用量增加。与2000年相比,产量的提高和投入物使用的减少导致到2022年估计总排放量减少39%,排放强度减少20%。该研究强调了特定地点的养分管理和技术,如低排放肥料、可再生能源、碳固存做法和育种,是未来的投资重点。
{"title":"Potato production in the United States: Two-decade update and future sustainable pathways","authors":"Isaac Kwadwo Mpanga,&nbsp;Russell Tronstad,&nbsp;Omololu John Idowu,&nbsp;Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe,&nbsp;Eric Koomson","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70213","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the United States, agriculture accounts for approximately 10% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including contributions from potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum L</i>.) production, a staple crop in the American diet. However, limited research has focused on recent trends in US potato production, particularly the contribution of different agricultural inputs and their role in GHG emissions. This study analyzes trends in US potato production using over two decades (1999/2000–2022) of annual survey data from the United States Department of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistical Service. Key areas of analysis include planted and harvested area, yields, total and unit sale prices, and input usage. The data are further used to estimate GHG from potato production through the Cool Farm Tool for 2000 and 2022. Our findings reveal a 34% and 32% decline in planted and harvested area, respectively, alongside a 22% reduction in total production across all market segments. Notably, yield increased by 15% in 2022 compared to 2000. The overall decrease in potato production aligns with sharp increases in unit price and total potato sales after adjusting for inflation, which rose by 54% and 20%, respectively. Inputs such as nitrogen, phosphorus, herbicides, and insecticides showed consistent reductions in per-hectare and total annual application, whereas potassium and fungicide usage increased. Yield improvements and reduced input usage led to a 39% decrease in total estimated emissions and a 20% reduction in emissions intensity by 2022 compared to 2000. The study highlights site-specific nutrient management and technologies like low-emission fertilizers, renewable energy, carbon sequestration practices, and breeding as future investment priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70213","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145406976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of differential light interception through manipulation of row orientation, spacing, and mulch on weed suppression and peanut yield 行向、行距和地膜不同截光对杂草抑制和花生产量的影响
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70212
Ankit Yadav, William Yates, David P. Russell, Zahoor A. Ganie, Andrew J. Price, Aniruddha Maity

Alabama, located in the northern subtropics, is the third-largest producer of peanut [Arachis hypogaea (L.)] in the United States. Historically, herbicides have been the primary means of weed control in peanut. However, increasing cases of herbicide-resistant weeds and a lack of commercially available herbicide-tolerant technology have limited the herbicide options for weed control in this crop. There is an urgent need to integrate non-chemical tools to prolong the effectiveness of the existing weed management program in peanut. A 2-year study in a split-split plot design was conducted at the Wiregrass Research and Extension Center, Alabama, for investigating integrative and individual effects of row orientation, mulch, and row spacing, in conjugation with a uniform, standard herbicide program, on weed control and yield in peanut. In this study, crop rows planted in east-west orientation allowed least weed emergence in both years, closely followed by the northeast-southwest (NE-SW), as compared to other row orientations. However, the NE-SW orientation yielded greatest across the years. Row spacing did not influence weed density but affected weed biomass by influencing canopy closure timing as revealed by leaf area index and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. Mulching influenced both weed density and biomass, especially early in the season. Based on the current study, the NE-SW row orientation along with mulch or cover optimized early-season weed suppression and yield in Alabama peanut fields.

阿拉巴马州位于亚热带北部,是美国第三大花生产地[Arachis hypogaea (L.)]。历史上,除草剂一直是控制花生杂草的主要手段。然而,越来越多的抗除草剂杂草和缺乏商业上可获得的抗除草剂技术限制了这种作物控制杂草的除草剂选择。目前迫切需要整合非化学手段来延长现有花生杂草管理方案的有效性。在阿拉巴马州的Wiregrass研究和推广中心进行了一项为期2年的研究,研究了行向、地膜和行距结合统一的标准除草剂计划对花生杂草控制和产量的综合和个别影响。在本研究中,与其他行距相比,东西向作物行距的杂草出苗率最低,东北-西南(NE-SW)紧随其后。然而,东北-西南方向多年来产量最大。叶面积指数和归一化植被指数(NDVI)数据表明,行距不影响杂草密度,但通过影响冠层闭合时间影响杂草生物量。覆盖对杂草密度和生物量都有影响,尤其是在季节早期。在现有研究的基础上,东北-西南行向加覆盖对阿拉巴马花生田早期杂草抑制效果和产量影响最大。
{"title":"Influence of differential light interception through manipulation of row orientation, spacing, and mulch on weed suppression and peanut yield","authors":"Ankit Yadav,&nbsp;William Yates,&nbsp;David P. Russell,&nbsp;Zahoor A. Ganie,&nbsp;Andrew J. Price,&nbsp;Aniruddha Maity","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70212","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alabama, located in the northern subtropics, is the third-largest producer of peanut [<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> (L.)] in the United States. Historically, herbicides have been the primary means of weed control in peanut. However, increasing cases of herbicide-resistant weeds and a lack of commercially available herbicide-tolerant technology have limited the herbicide options for weed control in this crop. There is an urgent need to integrate non-chemical tools to prolong the effectiveness of the existing weed management program in peanut. A 2-year study in a split-split plot design was conducted at the Wiregrass Research and Extension Center, Alabama, for investigating integrative and individual effects of row orientation, mulch, and row spacing, in conjugation with a uniform, standard herbicide program, on weed control and yield in peanut. In this study, crop rows planted in east-west orientation allowed least weed emergence in both years, closely followed by the northeast-southwest (NE-SW), as compared to other row orientations. However, the NE-SW orientation yielded greatest across the years. Row spacing did not influence weed density but affected weed biomass by influencing canopy closure timing as revealed by leaf area index and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. Mulching influenced both weed density and biomass, especially early in the season. Based on the current study, the NE-SW row orientation along with mulch or cover optimized early-season weed suppression and yield in Alabama peanut fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70212","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145406968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survey of deans of agriculture 农业学院院长调查
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70216
Robert L. Zimdahl

Agriculture is the essential human activity and the most widespread human interaction with the environment. It connects all—through the food we eat, the land we rely on, and the people who produce it. The purpose of this paper is to begin a conversation on the role ethics has and ought to play in preparing future agricultural professionals.

农业是人类最基本的活动,也是人类与环境最广泛的相互作用。它将我们所吃的食物、我们所依赖的土地和生产这些食物的人联系在一起。本文的目的是开始讨论伦理在培养未来的农业专业人员中所扮演的和应该扮演的角色。
{"title":"Survey of deans of agriculture","authors":"Robert L. Zimdahl","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70216","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agriculture is the essential human activity and the most widespread human interaction with the environment. It connects all—through the food we eat, the land we rely on, and the people who produce it. The purpose of this paper is to begin a conversation on the role ethics has and ought to play in preparing future agricultural professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70216","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145406939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modeling maize yield and agronomic efficiency using machine learning models: A comparative analysis 用机器学习模型模拟玉米产量和农艺效率:比较分析
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70206
Eric Asamoah, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Prem S. Bindraban, Vincent Logah

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to enhance yield predictions and optimize agronomic practices in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, understanding how these models generalize across heterogenous ecological context remains unresolved. This study, conducted in Ghana, evaluates the predictive performance of four ML models, namely, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for predicting maize yield and agronomic efficiency—defined as the increase in yield per unit of nutrient applied. It also compares variable importances identified by these models and how they influence yield and agronomic efficiency. The analysis used 4496 georeferenced maize trial datasets from various agroecological zones across Ghana, incorporating 35 variables related to soil properties, climate, topography, crop management, and fertilizer application. Model performance was assessed using three cross-validation techniques: leave-one-out, leave-site-out, and leave-agroecological-zone-out. Accuracy was measured using mean error, root mean square error (RMSE), and model efficiency coefficient. When evaluated under leave-one-out cross-validation, XGBoost consistently achieved the highest predictive accuracy with the lowest RMSE for yield (639.5 kg ha−1) and for agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (11.6 kg kg−1), which is moderate given the high variability in on-farm nutrient response. RF also performed well, while KNN and SVM showed poor extrapolation under stringent validation. Nitrogen application rate, rainfall, and crop genotype were consistently identified as the most influential explanatory variables across all models, providing insight into key drivers of productivity. These findings demonstrate the power of ML techniques in supporting agricultural planning and improving maize production in sub-Saharan Africa.

在撒哈拉以南非洲,机器学习(ML)越来越多地被用于提高产量预测和优化农艺实践。然而,了解这些模型如何在异质生态环境中推广仍然没有解决。本研究在加纳进行,评估了四种ML模型的预测性能,即随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost),用于预测玉米产量和农艺效率(定义为每单位施用养分的产量增加)。它还比较了这些模型确定的变量重要性以及它们如何影响产量和农艺效率。该分析使用了来自加纳不同农业生态区的4496个地理参考玉米试验数据集,纳入了与土壤性质、气候、地形、作物管理和施肥有关的35个变量。使用三种交叉验证技术评估模型性能:遗漏一个,遗漏站点和遗漏农业生态区域。准确度采用平均误差、均方根误差(RMSE)和模型效率系数来衡量。在留一交叉验证下进行评估时,XGBoost在产量(639.5 kg ha - 1)和氮肥农艺效率(11.6 kg kg - 1)方面的预测精度始终最高,RMSE最低,考虑到农场营养反应的高度可变性,这是中等的。RF也表现良好,而KNN和SVM在严格的验证下表现出较差的外推性。在所有模型中,氮肥施用量、降雨量和作物基因型一致被确定为最具影响力的解释变量,从而深入了解生产力的关键驱动因素。这些发现证明了机器学习技术在支持撒哈拉以南非洲农业规划和改善玉米生产方面的强大作用。
{"title":"Modeling maize yield and agronomic efficiency using machine learning models: A comparative analysis","authors":"Eric Asamoah,&nbsp;Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,&nbsp;Prem S. Bindraban,&nbsp;Vincent Logah","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70206","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to enhance yield predictions and optimize agronomic practices in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, understanding how these models generalize across heterogenous ecological context remains unresolved. This study, conducted in Ghana, evaluates the predictive performance of four ML models, namely, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), <i>k</i>-nearest neighbors (KNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for predicting maize yield and agronomic efficiency—defined as the increase in yield per unit of nutrient applied. It also compares variable importances identified by these models and how they influence yield and agronomic efficiency. The analysis used 4496 georeferenced maize trial datasets from various agroecological zones across Ghana, incorporating 35 variables related to soil properties, climate, topography, crop management, and fertilizer application. Model performance was assessed using three cross-validation techniques: leave-one-out, leave-site-out, and leave-agroecological-zone-out. Accuracy was measured using mean error, root mean square error (RMSE), and model efficiency coefficient. When evaluated under leave-one-out cross-validation, XGBoost consistently achieved the highest predictive accuracy with the lowest RMSE for yield (639.5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and for agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (11.6 kg kg<sup>−1</sup>), which is moderate given the high variability in on-farm nutrient response. RF also performed well, while KNN and SVM showed poor extrapolation under stringent validation. Nitrogen application rate, rainfall, and crop genotype were consistently identified as the most influential explanatory variables across all models, providing insight into key drivers of productivity. These findings demonstrate the power of ML techniques in supporting agricultural planning and improving maize production in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70206","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145406761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soybean yield response to biostimulant seed treatments in Brazil and the United States: A review 巴西和美国大豆产量对生物刺激素种子处理的反应:综述
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70211
Fabiano Colet, Alexander J. Lindsey, Osler Ortez, Horacio D. Lopez-Nicora, Laura E. Lindsey

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] farmers have shown increasing interest in using substances or microorganisms purported to enhance plant growth and development as plant biostimulant for seed treatment (BST). Field tests of soybean biostimulants in Brazil and the United States have shown inconsistent results in increasing crop yield. Additionally, there are substantial differences in the BST registration and regulation processes in Brazil compared to the United States. Therefore, the objectives of this literature review are to (1) synthesize published research articles on the influence of biostimulant products that contain the commonly used microorganisms of the genera Azospirillum, Bacillus, and Bradyrhizobium for seed treatment on soybean seed yield in Brazil and the United States and (2) compare the BST registration differences between the two countries. After synthesizing 40 papers, we found that biostimulants more frequently increased soybean yields in Brazil compared to the US field trials. One existing limitation is the absence of a clearly defined, unified, science-based regulatory pathway for BST products in the United States. Thus, the lack of regulation in the United States opens space for commercializing products without supporting data. In Brazil, the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock has established legislation for registering, producing, and commercializing BST. Overall, some of the inconsistent benefits identified in the US literature may be partially attributed to the need for improvements in product registration and quality tests. Additionally, the quality tests should be not only at the microbiological level but also at the agronomic level using research-based evidence from independent field trials.

大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。农民对使用旨在促进植物生长和发育的物质或微生物作为种子处理(BST)的植物生物刺激素表现出越来越大的兴趣。在巴西和美国进行的大豆生物刺激剂的田间试验显示,在提高作物产量方面的结果并不一致。此外,与美国相比,巴西的BST注册和监管过程存在重大差异。因此,本文献综述的目的是:(1)综合已发表的关于含有氮螺旋菌属、芽孢杆菌属和慢生根瘤菌属等常用微生物的生物刺激素产品对巴西和美国大豆种子产量影响的研究文章;(2)比较两国BST登记的差异。在综合了40篇论文后,我们发现,与美国的田间试验相比,生物刺激剂更频繁地提高了巴西的大豆产量。目前存在的一个限制是,美国缺乏明确定义的、统一的、基于科学的BST产品监管途径。因此,美国缺乏监管为没有数据支持的产品商业化开辟了空间。在巴西,农业和畜牧业部已经制定了登记、生产和商业化BST的立法。总体而言,美国文献中发现的一些不一致的益处可能部分归因于产品注册和质量测试方面的改进需求。此外,质量检测不仅应在微生物水平上,而且应在农艺水平上使用来自独立田间试验的基于研究的证据。
{"title":"Soybean yield response to biostimulant seed treatments in Brazil and the United States: A review","authors":"Fabiano Colet,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lindsey,&nbsp;Osler Ortez,&nbsp;Horacio D. Lopez-Nicora,&nbsp;Laura E. Lindsey","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70211","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] farmers have shown increasing interest in using substances or microorganisms purported to enhance plant growth and development as plant biostimulant for seed treatment (BST). Field tests of soybean biostimulants in Brazil and the United States have shown inconsistent results in increasing crop yield. Additionally, there are substantial differences in the BST registration and regulation processes in Brazil compared to the United States. Therefore, the objectives of this literature review are to (1) synthesize published research articles on the influence of biostimulant products that contain the commonly used microorganisms of the genera <i>Azospirillum, Bacillus</i>, and <i>Bradyrhizobium</i> for seed treatment on soybean seed yield in Brazil and the United States and (2) compare the BST registration differences between the two countries. After synthesizing 40 papers, we found that biostimulants more frequently increased soybean yields in Brazil compared to the US field trials. One existing limitation is the absence of a clearly defined, unified, science-based regulatory pathway for BST products in the United States. Thus, the lack of regulation in the United States opens space for commercializing products without supporting data. In Brazil, the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock has established legislation for registering, producing, and commercializing BST. Overall, some of the inconsistent benefits identified in the US literature may be partially attributed to the need for improvements in product registration and quality tests. Additionally, the quality tests should be not only at the microbiological level but also at the agronomic level using research-based evidence from independent field trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70211","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sunflower yield modeling with explainable artificial intelligence: Historical weather impacts across half a century of American production 向日葵产量模型与可解释的人工智能:历史天气影响半个世纪的美国生产
IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1002/agj2.70204
Sambadi Majumder, Chase M. Mason

This study applies explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to analyze the impact of inter-year variation in weather conditions on yields of oilseed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) across the United States. By integrating historical county-level yield data from 1976 to 2022 with monthly meteorological data over the same period, we identified key weather predictors influencing sunflower yields at national and state levels along with critical yield-sensitive threshold temperature and precipitation values that predict reduced yield. Across the sunflower production range, the most critical climate variables identified are July and August maximum temperatures and total precipitation, reflecting yield vulnerability to summer heat waves and drought during budding and flowering. Secondarily, overly cool temperatures during spring planting and establishment (May–June) reduce yields, as do overly cool end-of-season temperatures during seed maturation and harvest (September–October), indicating risk of frost or insufficient growing degree days to support plant development. Winter precipitation and temperatures were also detected as important to overall yield dynamics, in particular where wetter winters benefitted yields. Specific temperature and precipitation tipping points vary across the geographic extent of production, but align with existing agronomic knowledge. Our XAI approach enhances model transparency, offering valuable insights for farmers and policymakers to develop adaptive strategies for sunflower cultivation under climate change. Future research incorporating additional factors like soil characteristics and agricultural practices can further refine yield predictions.

本研究应用可解释人工智能(XAI)分析了天气条件的年际变化对美国油籽向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)产量的影响。通过将1976年至2022年的历史县级产量数据与同期的月度气象数据相结合,我们确定了影响全国和各州向日葵产量的关键天气预测因素,以及预测产量下降的关键产量敏感阈值温度和降水值。在整个向日葵生产范围内,确定的最关键气候变量是7月和8月的最高温度和总降水量,反映了发芽和开花期间夏季热浪和干旱对产量的脆弱性。其次,在春季播种和建立期间(5 - 6月)温度过低会降低产量,在种子成熟和收获期间(9 - 10月)季末温度过低也会降低产量,这表明存在霜冻风险或生长天数不足,无法支持植物发育。冬季降水和温度对总体产量动态也很重要,特别是在冬季湿润有利于产量的地区。具体的温度和降水临界点因生产的地理范围而异,但与现有的农艺知识一致。我们的XAI方法提高了模型的透明度,为农民和决策者制定气候变化下向日葵种植的适应性策略提供了有价值的见解。未来的研究将纳入土壤特征和农业实践等其他因素,可以进一步完善产量预测。
{"title":"Sunflower yield modeling with explainable artificial intelligence: Historical weather impacts across half a century of American production","authors":"Sambadi Majumder,&nbsp;Chase M. Mason","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study applies explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to analyze the impact of inter-year variation in weather conditions on yields of oilseed sunflower (<i>Helianthus annuus</i> L.) across the United States. By integrating historical county-level yield data from 1976 to 2022 with monthly meteorological data over the same period, we identified key weather predictors influencing sunflower yields at national and state levels along with critical yield-sensitive threshold temperature and precipitation values that predict reduced yield. Across the sunflower production range, the most critical climate variables identified are July and August maximum temperatures and total precipitation, reflecting yield vulnerability to summer heat waves and drought during budding and flowering. Secondarily, overly cool temperatures during spring planting and establishment (May–June) reduce yields, as do overly cool end-of-season temperatures during seed maturation and harvest (September–October), indicating risk of frost or insufficient growing degree days to support plant development. Winter precipitation and temperatures were also detected as important to overall yield dynamics, in particular where wetter winters benefitted yields. Specific temperature and precipitation tipping points vary across the geographic extent of production, but align with existing agronomic knowledge. Our XAI approach enhances model transparency, offering valuable insights for farmers and policymakers to develop adaptive strategies for sunflower cultivation under climate change. Future research incorporating additional factors like soil characteristics and agricultural practices can further refine yield predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70204","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145406658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agronomy Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1