Vijaya R. Joshi, Christopher Villalobos, Cheryl H. Porter, Gerrit Hoogenboom
Crop models are essential tools to understand risks, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties in agricultural systems. Advancements in digital data acquisition and accessibility of crop and land area data with larger spatial coverage and higher spatial resolutions necessitate corresponding developments in flexible multi-scale crop modeling application framework to facilitate decision-making and policy formulation from sub-national to global levels. While a few tools and approaches exist for spatial applications of crop models, their lesser flexibility owing to dependency on external programs, portability issues, complexity in files setup, and limited functionality thwarts users to employ crop models at larger scales. This paper aims to introduce Pythia, a novel gridded modeling framework for Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)-cropping system model (CSM), and demonstrate its application. The objectives are to explain Pythia design, execution workflow, and to show its main functionalities. Inputs to the Pythia framework include (i) point vector files that specify the sites of weather data and simulation points, (ii) a raster map of soil-profile identity numbers, (iii) a raster map of crop area (iv) a DSSAT FileX template, and (v) a configuration file to provide references to the required model input files and databases, and to set up the dynamic portions of the FileX template. A case study from maize cropping system in Ghana is used to demonstrate the applications of Pythia. Flexibilities in spatial coverage and parameterizing model inputs in Pythia provide DSSAT-CSM users a useful tool to run spatial simulations in local machines and in high-performance computing environment.
{"title":"Pythia: A gridded modeling framework for decision support system for agrotechnology transfer for multiple spatiotemporal scale applications","authors":"Vijaya R. Joshi, Christopher Villalobos, Cheryl H. Porter, Gerrit Hoogenboom","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70272","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop models are essential tools to understand risks, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties in agricultural systems. Advancements in digital data acquisition and accessibility of crop and land area data with larger spatial coverage and higher spatial resolutions necessitate corresponding developments in flexible multi-scale crop modeling application framework to facilitate decision-making and policy formulation from sub-national to global levels. While a few tools and approaches exist for spatial applications of crop models, their lesser flexibility owing to dependency on external programs, portability issues, complexity in files setup, and limited functionality thwarts users to employ crop models at larger scales. This paper aims to introduce Pythia, a novel gridded modeling framework for Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT)-cropping system model (CSM), and demonstrate its application. The objectives are to explain Pythia design, execution workflow, and to show its main functionalities. Inputs to the Pythia framework include (i) point vector files that specify the sites of weather data and simulation points, (ii) a raster map of soil-profile identity numbers, (iii) a raster map of crop area (iv) a DSSAT FileX template, and (v) a configuration file to provide references to the required model input files and databases, and to set up the dynamic portions of the FileX template. A case study from maize cropping system in Ghana is used to demonstrate the applications of Pythia. Flexibilities in spatial coverage and parameterizing model inputs in Pythia provide DSSAT-CSM users a useful tool to run spatial simulations in local machines and in high-performance computing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70272","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Salem Ermish, Rachel Vann, Jason Ward, Wesley Everman, Robert Austin
The accurate estimation of soybean (Glycine max) stand establishment is essential for evaluating crop emergence and informing early-season management practices. Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery and computer vision offer opportunities to automate plant population assessments; however, limited information exists on their accuracy in soybeans. This study evaluated two commercial UAV-based plant counting platforms, a point-based (convolutional neural network–derived) and a line-based (Hough transform–derived) approach across two growing seasons, three flight altitudes (15.2, 45.7, and 91.4 m), and seven plant removal treatments, including a control (no removal). UAV imagery was collected at 7- to 10-day intervals from 10 to 36 days after planting (DAP), and predictions were compared to manual on-ground counts. The point-based method provided the highest accuracy (within ±12% of ground-truth; R2 = 0.81) when imagery was collected between 14 and 20 DAP at 15.2-m altitude. Accuracy declined beyond 27 DAP as canopy overlap increased. The line-based method remained more stable across altitudes and later growth stages but consistently overestimated plant counts, particularly in dense and narrow row canopies. Incorporating on-ground calibration areas improved accuracy by an average of 28% and up to 48% for the line-based approach in narrow rows. Row spacing and plant removal patterns had minimal effects on prediction error, although short repeating gaps were poorly detected by the line-based method. Overall, UAV-based plant counts in soybean are feasible and dependable when flights are timed during early vegetative growth and supported by calibration, providing a practical tool for in-season management and field-based crop monitoring.
{"title":"Optimizing unmanned aerial vehicle–based stand counts in soybean: Effects of flight timing, altitude, and analytical method","authors":"Salem Ermish, Rachel Vann, Jason Ward, Wesley Everman, Robert Austin","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70303","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accurate estimation of soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) stand establishment is essential for evaluating crop emergence and informing early-season management practices. Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery and computer vision offer opportunities to automate plant population assessments; however, limited information exists on their accuracy in soybeans. This study evaluated two commercial UAV-based plant counting platforms, a point-based (convolutional neural network–derived) and a line-based (Hough transform–derived) approach across two growing seasons, three flight altitudes (15.2, 45.7, and 91.4 m), and seven plant removal treatments, including a control (no removal). UAV imagery was collected at 7- to 10-day intervals from 10 to 36 days after planting (DAP), and predictions were compared to manual on-ground counts. The point-based method provided the highest accuracy (within ±12% of ground-truth; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81) when imagery was collected between 14 and 20 DAP at 15.2-m altitude. Accuracy declined beyond 27 DAP as canopy overlap increased. The line-based method remained more stable across altitudes and later growth stages but consistently overestimated plant counts, particularly in dense and narrow row canopies. Incorporating on-ground calibration areas improved accuracy by an average of 28% and up to 48% for the line-based approach in narrow rows. Row spacing and plant removal patterns had minimal effects on prediction error, although short repeating gaps were poorly detected by the line-based method. Overall, UAV-based plant counts in soybean are feasible and dependable when flights are timed during early vegetative growth and supported by calibration, providing a practical tool for in-season management and field-based crop monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70303","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dereje Ademe Birhan, Hardeep Singh, Eajaz Ahmad Dar, Vivek Sharma, Michael Dukes, Lakesh K. Sharma
Efficient nitrogen (N) fertilizer management is essential for advancing maize production, particularly in sandy soils of subtropical regions like Suwannee Valley, Florida, where NO3─N leaching poses environmental risks. A 30-year simulation using a calibrated and evaluated Crop Environment Resource Synthesis-Maize model assessed the effects of N sources, rates, application timing, planting dates, and water regimes on grain yield (GY) and NO3─N leaching. Results showed that moderate to high N rates (202–404 kg ha−1) achieved the highest yields but increased NO3─N leaching by 33%–38% compared to the recommended N rate (RNR) (269 kg N ha−1). Early planting (March 1–22), split N applications, and precise irrigation (80%–90% of maximum available water [MAW]) improved yield up to 25% and reduced NO3─N leaching up to 30%. Under rainfed conditions, a 50% reduction in the RNR led to a negligible change in yield but decreased NO3─N leaching by 35%, while it reduced yield by 15%–30% under irrigated conditions. Optimal practices, including splitting N into five times, irrigation at 90% of MAW, and March 8 planting, achieved the highest yields (10,182–11,925 kg [dry matter] ha−1) and the lowest NO3─N leaching (60–63 kg ha−1). Combined analysis revealed that the interaction between N rate and water management was significant for yield, N uptake, and NO3─N leaching (p < 0.01). Irrigation at 90% of MAW with 100% of the RNR maximized yield (12,422 kg ha−1) and N uptake (340 kg ha−1), and reasonably lower NO3─N leaching (40 kg ha−1). These findings highlight the critical role of integrated management practices to improve GY while minimizing environmental impacts.
有效的氮肥管理对于促进玉米生产至关重要,特别是在像佛罗里达州Suwannee Valley这样的亚热带沙质土壤中,那里的NO3─N淋溶会带来环境风险。利用经过校准和评估的作物环境资源综合-玉米模型进行了为期30年的模拟,评估了氮素来源、施用量、施用时间、种植日期和水分制度对粮食产量和硝态氮淋溶的影响。结果表明,与推荐施氮量(269 kg N ha−1)相比,中高施氮量(202 ~ 404 kg ha−1)可获得最高产量,但硝态氮淋溶增加33% ~ 38%。早播(3月1日至22日)、分施氮和精确灌溉(最大有效水量的80%-90% [MAW])可使产量提高25%,使硝态氮淋失减少30%。在雨养条件下,RNR降低50%对产量的影响可以忽略不计,但使NO3─N淋溶减少35%,而在灌溉条件下则使产量减少15%-30%。最佳施肥措施为:分5次施氮、90% MAW灌溉和3月8日播种,产量最高(10182 ~ 11,925 kg[干物质]ha - 1),硝态氮淋失最低(60 ~ 63 kg ha - 1)。综合分析显示,施氮量与水分管理对产量、氮素吸收和硝态氮淋溶具有显著的交互作用(p < 0.01)。以90%的MAW和100%的RNR灌溉,产量(12,422 kg ha - 1)和氮吸收量(340 kg ha - 1)最大,硝态氮淋失(40 kg ha - 1)较低。这些发现突出了综合管理实践在改善生态环境的同时最大限度地减少对环境的影响方面的关键作用。
{"title":"Modeling nitrogen management to balance yield and nitrate leaching in maize in a Florida sandy soil","authors":"Dereje Ademe Birhan, Hardeep Singh, Eajaz Ahmad Dar, Vivek Sharma, Michael Dukes, Lakesh K. Sharma","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient nitrogen (N) fertilizer management is essential for advancing maize production, particularly in sandy soils of subtropical regions like Suwannee Valley, Florida, where NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching poses environmental risks. A 30-year simulation using a calibrated and evaluated Crop Environment Resource Synthesis-Maize model assessed the effects of N sources, rates, application timing, planting dates, and water regimes on grain yield (GY) and NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching. Results showed that moderate to high N rates (202–404 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) achieved the highest yields but increased NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching by 33%–38% compared to the recommended N rate (RNR) (269 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). Early planting (March 1–22), split N applications, and precise irrigation (80%–90% of maximum available water [MAW]) improved yield up to 25% and reduced NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching up to 30%. Under rainfed conditions, a 50% reduction in the RNR led to a negligible change in yield but decreased NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching by 35%, while it reduced yield by 15%–30% under irrigated conditions. Optimal practices, including splitting N into five times, irrigation at 90% of MAW, and March 8 planting, achieved the highest yields (10,182–11,925 kg [dry matter] ha<sup>−1</sup>) and the lowest NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching (60–63 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Combined analysis revealed that the interaction between N rate and water management was significant for yield, N uptake, and NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Irrigation at 90% of MAW with 100% of the RNR maximized yield (12,422 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and N uptake (340 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), and reasonably lower NO<sub>3</sub>─N leaching (40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). These findings highlight the critical role of integrated management practices to improve GY while minimizing environmental impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth M. Hawkins, John P. Fulton, Aaron B. Wilson, Stephanie Karhoff
On-farm experimentation (OFE) data, when aggregated across years and locations, is rich with information that enhances agricultural science and informs more specific management recommendations. Standardizing collection of metadata within an OFE network augments the traditionally measured data (e.g., population, yield) to enable broader comparisons that may be impractical at the field level. This paper evaluates the utility of aggregated OFE data in informing agronomic recommendations, investigates potential state and regional agronomic analyses, and illustrates how integrating OFE data with complementary data sets (e.g., historical weather conditions) can help identify potential contributions to agronomic variability across the region of study and elucidate additional research inquiry. Seven years of OFE-derived data and associated metadata were aggregated to explore the analytical power of this type of integrative approach. The exploration of this dataset identified planting date and relative maturity as the strongest predictors of yield variability for corn and soybeans. Regional differences in corn yield response to fungicide application were also observed. This paper demonstrates how incorporating spatially and temporally complete historical weather data at sub-seasonal levels with OFE data enables additional analysis that could lead to a better understanding of the environmental factors that influence crop performance. Standardizing metadata collection and aggregating data from OFE offer significant opportunities for advancing agronomic learning. These examples highlight the potential of integrating data collected across a diverse range of environmental conditions and management practices to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the interactions among these variables and their effects on crop yield and profitability.
{"title":"Improving research and insights through the aggregation of on-farm experimentation data","authors":"Elizabeth M. Hawkins, John P. Fulton, Aaron B. Wilson, Stephanie Karhoff","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70297","url":null,"abstract":"<p>On-farm experimentation (OFE) data, when aggregated across years and locations, is rich with information that enhances agricultural science and informs more specific management recommendations. Standardizing collection of metadata within an OFE network augments the traditionally measured data (e.g., population, yield) to enable broader comparisons that may be impractical at the field level. This paper evaluates the utility of aggregated OFE data in informing agronomic recommendations, investigates potential state and regional agronomic analyses, and illustrates how integrating OFE data with complementary data sets (e.g., historical weather conditions) can help identify potential contributions to agronomic variability across the region of study and elucidate additional research inquiry. Seven years of OFE-derived data and associated metadata were aggregated to explore the analytical power of this type of integrative approach. The exploration of this dataset identified planting date and relative maturity as the strongest predictors of yield variability for corn and soybeans. Regional differences in corn yield response to fungicide application were also observed. This paper demonstrates how incorporating spatially and temporally complete historical weather data at sub-seasonal levels with OFE data enables additional analysis that could lead to a better understanding of the environmental factors that influence crop performance. Standardizing metadata collection and aggregating data from OFE offer significant opportunities for advancing agronomic learning. These examples highlight the potential of integrating data collected across a diverse range of environmental conditions and management practices to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the interactions among these variables and their effects on crop yield and profitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70297","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Climate change is increasing heat stress in many olive-growing regions, raising concerns about its effects on oil quality and cultivar performance. This study investigated the impact of high temperatures on the quality and chemical composition of olive oil from three irrigated Olea europaea L. cultivars, Arbosana, Chemlali, and Koroneiki, grown under arid climate conditions in southern Tunisia (Sfax, Mahres). The research aimed to clarify how heat stress influences key oil quality parameters and whether cultivars exhibit distinct adaptive responses. Over 3 years, fruit weight, oil content, and oil quality were analyzed. Results differed across cultivars. Chemlali showed the highest carotenoid concentrations (14.54 mg kg−1) and Koroneiki showed the highest chlorophyll level (5.03 mg kg−1). Significant differences in total phenol content were recorded, with Koroneiki reaching 940.14 mg kg−1, followed by Chemlali (409.41 mg kg−1) and Arbosana (320.66 mg kg−1). In terms of fatty acids, oleic acid remained dominant in all cultivars (>55%), reaching 74% in Koroneiki. Koroneiki also had the lowest palmitic acid (12.59%) and linoleic acid (8.40%). All cultivars preserved stable oil quality under high temperatures and met extra virgin standards. Notably, heat stress increased oil concentration at harvest, exceeding 21% in all cultivars. These findings showed that high temperatures influenced several oil composition traits, and they do not necessarily reduce overall oil quality.
气候变化加剧了许多橄榄种植区的热应激,引发了人们对其对油质和品种性能影响的担忧。本研究调查了高温对突尼斯南部干旱气候条件下种植的三种灌溉油橄榄(Olea europaea L.)品种——Arbosana、Chemlali和Koroneiki橄榄油质量和化学成分的影响。该研究旨在阐明热胁迫对油品品质关键参数的影响,以及不同品种是否表现出不同的适应反应。在3年的时间里,对果实的重量、含油量和油质进行了分析。不同品种的结果不同。类胡萝卜素含量最高的是Chemlali (14.54 mg kg - 1),叶绿素含量最高的是Koroneiki (5.03 mg kg - 1)。总酚含量差异显著,Koroneiki达940.14 mg kg - 1,其次是Chemlali (409.41 mg kg - 1)和Arbosana (320.66 mg kg - 1)。在脂肪酸方面,油酸在所有品种中占主导地位(55%),在科罗内基中达到74%。其中棕榈酸(12.59%)和亚油酸(8.40%)含量最低。所有品种在高温下都能保持稳定的油脂品质,并达到特级初榨标准。值得注意的是,热胁迫增加了收获时的油浓度,所有品种的油浓度都超过了21%。这些发现表明,高温影响了油的几种成分特征,但并不一定会降低油的整体质量。
{"title":"Impact of heat stress on olive oil quality in irrigated cultivars under arid climate conditions","authors":"Mohamed Ayadi, Lina Trabelsi, Walid Ouled Amor, Gouta Ben Ahmed, Kamel Gargouri","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70282","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change is increasing heat stress in many olive-growing regions, raising concerns about its effects on oil quality and cultivar performance. This study investigated the impact of high temperatures on the quality and chemical composition of olive oil from three irrigated <i>Olea europaea</i> L. cultivars, Arbosana, Chemlali, and Koroneiki, grown under arid climate conditions in southern Tunisia (Sfax, Mahres). The research aimed to clarify how heat stress influences key oil quality parameters and whether cultivars exhibit distinct adaptive responses. Over 3 years, fruit weight, oil content, and oil quality were analyzed. Results differed across cultivars. Chemlali showed the highest carotenoid concentrations (14.54 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) and Koroneiki showed the highest chlorophyll level (5.03 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>). Significant differences in total phenol content were recorded, with Koroneiki reaching 940.14 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>, followed by Chemlali (409.41 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) and Arbosana (320.66 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>). In terms of fatty acids, oleic acid remained dominant in all cultivars (>55%), reaching 74% in Koroneiki. Koroneiki also had the lowest palmitic acid (12.59%) and linoleic acid (8.40%). All cultivars preserved stable oil quality under high temperatures and met extra virgin standards. Notably, heat stress increased oil concentration at harvest, exceeding 21% in all cultivars. These findings showed that high temperatures influenced several oil composition traits, and they do not necessarily reduce overall oil quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina Luciana Abreu de Melo, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, Fábio Ricardo Marin, Jos C. van Dam
How to ensure that “the availability of soil water does not limit plant growth or transpiration?” Determining the so-called crop coefficient (Kc) relies on this assumption of optimal or non-limiting soil water conditions, which, in turn, is understood as the soil water content at field capacity, a parameter with, de facto, no relation to plants or transpiration. Many studies on crop evapotranspiration ignore the dynamic nature of plant available water (PAW) driven by the soil hydraulic properties (water retention and hydraulic conductivity) and the characteristics of the plant root system. This raises important questions: How can we guarantee that a Kc value is transferable if soil and plant hydraulics are not explicitly considered? And how can we reconcile the practical determination of crop evapotranspiration with the theoretical one using complex water transfer models? While addressing these complexities remains a challenge, recent advances in process-based modeling offer new opportunities to represent soil–plant–atmosphere interactions more accurately, and to refine the criteria underlying Kc and PAW. Integrating such physically based understanding with established approaches may help bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical applications, ultimately supporting more reliable and adaptable methods for estimating crop evapotranspiration.
{"title":"FAO crop coefficient and plant-available water: Do soil and plant hydraulic properties matter?","authors":"Marina Luciana Abreu de Melo, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, Fábio Ricardo Marin, Jos C. van Dam","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How to ensure that “the availability of soil water does not limit plant growth or transpiration?” Determining the so-called crop coefficient (<i>K<sub>c</sub></i>) relies on this assumption of optimal or non-limiting soil water conditions, which, in turn, is understood as the soil water content at field capacity, a parameter with, de facto, no relation to plants or transpiration. Many studies on crop evapotranspiration ignore the dynamic nature of plant available water (PAW) driven by the soil hydraulic properties (water retention and hydraulic conductivity) and the characteristics of the plant root system. This raises important questions: How can we guarantee that a <i>K<sub>c</sub></i> value is transferable if soil and plant hydraulics are not explicitly considered? And how can we reconcile the practical determination of crop evapotranspiration with the theoretical one using complex water transfer models? While addressing these complexities remains a challenge, recent advances in process-based modeling offer new opportunities to represent soil–plant–atmosphere interactions more accurately, and to refine the criteria underlying <i>K<sub>c</sub></i> and PAW. Integrating such physically based understanding with established approaches may help bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical applications, ultimately supporting more reliable and adaptable methods for estimating crop evapotranspiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70277","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The study provides robust, multi-dimensional evidence on the drivers of Kharchia wheat (Triticum aestivum) conservation in the arid saline agroecosystems of Rajasthan. The objective is to understand how sociocultural, economic, and ecological factors influence farmers’ conservation behavior and highlight the role of traditional landrace conservation as a climate-resilient strategy for sustaining agriculture and livelihoods in an arid salt-affected soil in India. The findings showed that sociocultural enablers, especially enduring food traditions, a strong sense of local identity, and intergenerational seed-exchange networks, serve as the most significant predictors shaping farmers’ intentions to conserve this landrace. Drawing on a mixed-method approach in the Pali district of Rajasthan, India, the research integrates household surveys, focus group discussions, transect walks, and controlled field observations. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the ecological, economic, and sociocultural drivers shaping conservation behavior. Results reveal that farmers value Kharchia wheat not only for its adaptability to salinity and heat stress but also for its sociocultural significance and its economic role in ensuring stable yields and fodder supply. Education, access to extension, and local market demand emerged as critical enablers of conservation, while climate stress and price volatility posed key challenges. The study pinpoints the critical role of community-driven landrace conservation for sustaining agrobiodiversity, adaptive potential, and long-term rural resilience.
{"title":"Sociocultural and economic drivers of Kharchia wheat conservation in arid saline India","authors":"Dheeraj Singh, Mahendra Kumar Chaudhary, Chandan Kumar, Arvind Singh Tetarwal, Devendra Singh, Graciela Dolores Avila-Quezada, Mohamed A. Mattar","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70290","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study provides robust, multi-dimensional evidence on the drivers of <i>Kharchia</i> wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>) conservation in the arid saline agroecosystems of Rajasthan. The objective is to understand how sociocultural, economic, and ecological factors influence farmers’ conservation behavior and highlight the role of traditional landrace conservation as a climate-resilient strategy for sustaining agriculture and livelihoods in an arid salt-affected soil in India. The findings showed that sociocultural enablers, especially enduring food traditions, a strong sense of local identity, and intergenerational seed-exchange networks, serve as the most significant predictors shaping farmers’ intentions to conserve this landrace. Drawing on a mixed-method approach in the Pali district of Rajasthan, India, the research integrates household surveys, focus group discussions, transect walks, and controlled field observations. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the ecological, economic, and sociocultural drivers shaping conservation behavior. Results reveal that farmers value <i>Kharchia</i> wheat not only for its adaptability to salinity and heat stress but also for its sociocultural significance and its economic role in ensuring stable yields and fodder supply. Education, access to extension, and local market demand emerged as critical enablers of conservation, while climate stress and price volatility posed key challenges. The study pinpoints the critical role of community-driven landrace conservation for sustaining agrobiodiversity, adaptive potential, and long-term rural resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shinhye Lee, Sebastian Munz, Emir Memic, Yawen You, Simone Graeff-Hönninger
Phosphorus (P) is essential for maize (Zea mays L.) growth but is a limited and non-renewable resource. Studies using DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize remain scarce for low-P soils. This study assessed maize yield response to P fertilization in P-deficient soils using an adapted version of the DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize model with minor code modifications to vegetative partitioning. The CERES-Maize was calibrated and evaluated using data from two field experiments (2020–2023) conducted in Southern Germany on P-deficient soils, with P fertilizer treatments of 0 and 85 kg P ha−1 in 2020 and 2021, and 0, 25, 50, and 75 kg P ha−1 in 2022 and 2023. Evaluation results showed a good agreement between simulated and measured data for aboveground biomass (normalized root mean square error [nRMSE] = 24.4%, d-stat = 0.98) and grain yield (nRMSE = 11.4%, d-stat = 0.99). While overall leaf area index simulations were satisfactory across treatments (d-stat = 0.87), accuracy was lower in low or zero P fertilizer treatments, with a d-stat of 0.72 for the zero P treatment compared to 0.97 for the 85 kg P ha−1 treatment in 2020 and 2021. CERES-Maize can be used to support P management decisions, but it showed a limited ability to simulate leaf/P dynamics under very low P levels in this study. These findings confirm the capability of CERES-Maize to simulate maize growth and yield responses to varying P fertilization. Future modeling research should further investigate performance under low P fertilizer levels in greater detail across diverse environments to enhance and validate the DSSAT P subroutine.
磷(P)是玉米(Zea mays L.)生长所必需的,但却是一种有限且不可再生的资源。在低磷土壤中使用DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize的研究仍然很少。本研究利用DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize模型的改进版本,对营养分配进行了轻微的代码修改,评估了缺磷土壤中玉米产量对磷肥的响应。CERES-Maize利用在德国南部缺磷土壤上进行的两项田间试验(2020 - 2023)的数据进行校准和评估,分别在2020和2021年施磷肥0和85 kg P ha - 1,在2022和2023年施磷肥0、25、50和75 kg P ha - 1。评价结果表明,地上生物量(归一化均方根误差[nRMSE] = 24.4%, d-stat = 0.98)和粮食产量(nRMSE = 11.4%, d-stat = 0.99)的模拟数据与实测数据吻合较好。虽然不同处理的总体叶面积指数模拟结果令人满意(d-stat = 0.87),但低磷或零磷处理的准确性较低,在2020年和2021年,零磷处理的d-stat为0.72,而85 kg P ha - 1处理的d-stat为0.97。CERES-Maize可用于支持磷管理决策,但在本研究中,它在极低磷水平下模拟叶片/磷动态的能力有限。这些发现证实了CERES-Maize模拟不同施磷量下玉米生长和产量响应的能力。未来的建模研究应该进一步研究在不同环境下低磷水平下的性能,以增强和验证DSSAT P子程序。
{"title":"Assessing maize growth and yield response to different P fertilizer levels with an adapted DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize model","authors":"Shinhye Lee, Sebastian Munz, Emir Memic, Yawen You, Simone Graeff-Hönninger","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70271","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Phosphorus (P) is essential for maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) growth but is a limited and non-renewable resource. Studies using DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize remain scarce for low-P soils. This study assessed maize yield response to P fertilization in P-deficient soils using an adapted version of the DSSAT CSM-CERES-Maize model with minor code modifications to vegetative partitioning. The CERES-Maize was calibrated and evaluated using data from two field experiments (2020–2023) conducted in Southern Germany on P-deficient soils, with P fertilizer treatments of 0 and 85 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2020 and 2021, and 0, 25, 50, and 75 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2022 and 2023. Evaluation results showed a good agreement between simulated and measured data for aboveground biomass (normalized root mean square error [nRMSE] = 24.4%, d-stat = 0.98) and grain yield (nRMSE = 11.4%, d-stat = 0.99). While overall leaf area index simulations were satisfactory across treatments (d-stat = 0.87), accuracy was lower in low or zero P fertilizer treatments, with a d-stat of 0.72 for the zero P treatment compared to 0.97 for the 85 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> treatment in 2020 and 2021. CERES-Maize can be used to support P management decisions, but it showed a limited ability to simulate leaf/P dynamics under very low P levels in this study. These findings confirm the capability of CERES-Maize to simulate maize growth and yield responses to varying P fertilization. Future modeling research should further investigate performance under low P fertilizer levels in greater detail across diverse environments to enhance and validate the DSSAT P subroutine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70271","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ivan S. Adolwa, Steve Phillips, Martha N. Okumu, Therese Agneroh, Canon E. N. Savala, Denver M. Barasa, Basil Kavishe, Esther Mugi-Ngenga, Kokou A. Amouzou, Joses Muthamia, Thomas Oberthür, Shamie Zingore
Past efforts have concentrated on top-down approaches in delivering precision nutrient management (PNM) practices to smallholder farmers, but with little yield and economic impact for farmers. Farmer-centric on-farm experimentation (OFE) is an approach designed to effectively engage farmers in generating technologies tailored to the agroecological, socioeconomic, and cultural complexities of smallholder farming systems. This study, implemented in East and West Africa, used a mixed methodology approach, including a survey and agronomic measurements, to gain insights into farmer learning and nutrient management decision-making, and the outcomes from their participation in OFE processes. For the agronomic assessment, a simple experimental design was employed from 2021 to 2024, whereby smallholder farm-scale fields (0.5–1 ha) were divided into two experimental plots to compare optimized treatment (OT) and a farmer practice (FP). Considerable co-learning between farmers and other stakeholders was observed, particularly in Kenya and Tanzania. There was a positive trend in maize yields over time in the FP treatment, attributed to the involvement of farmers in OFE. Yield improvements of up to 53% were achieved, although profitability was observed only in Côte d'Ivoire. While the scientist-led OT in most cases outperformed the FP, farmers continuously adopted improved nutrient management practices. This highlights the critical role of OFE in scaling PNM by providing a platform to integrate scientific and endogenous knowledge, entrench learning, and scale it by linking to wider innovation systems. OFE also offers precise and relevant data for farmer decision-making on nutrient management drawn from co-designed trials and co-developed agronomic knowledge.
过去的努力集中在自上而下的方法上,向小农提供精确的营养管理(PNM)实践,但对农民的产量和经济影响很小。以农民为中心的农场试验(OFE)是一种方法,旨在有效地使农民参与开发适合小农农业系统的农业生态、社会经济和文化复杂性的技术。这项研究在东非和西非实施,采用了一种混合方法,包括调查和农艺测量,以深入了解农民学习和营养管理决策,以及他们参与OFE过程的结果。在农艺评估方面,2021 - 2024年采用简单的试验设计,将小农规模农田(0.5-1 ha)分为两个试验区,比较优化处理(OT)和农民实践(FP)。观察到农民和其他利益攸关方之间有相当多的共同学习,特别是在肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚。在FP处理中,玉米产量随着时间的推移呈积极趋势,这归因于农民参与OFE。产量提高了53%,尽管仅在Côte d' ivire观察到盈利能力。虽然科学家领导的OT在大多数情况下优于计划生育,但农民不断采用改进的营养管理方法。这突出了OFE在扩展PNM方面的关键作用,它提供了一个整合科学和内生知识的平台,巩固了学习,并通过连接更广泛的创新系统来扩展PNM。OFE还从共同设计的试验和共同开发的农艺知识中为农民的营养管理决策提供了精确和相关的数据。
{"title":"On-farm experimentation in East and West Africa improves nutrient management decision-making and yield in cereal smallholder farming systems","authors":"Ivan S. Adolwa, Steve Phillips, Martha N. Okumu, Therese Agneroh, Canon E. N. Savala, Denver M. Barasa, Basil Kavishe, Esther Mugi-Ngenga, Kokou A. Amouzou, Joses Muthamia, Thomas Oberthür, Shamie Zingore","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70276","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past efforts have concentrated on top-down approaches in delivering precision nutrient management (PNM) practices to smallholder farmers, but with little yield and economic impact for farmers. Farmer-centric on-farm experimentation (OFE) is an approach designed to effectively engage farmers in generating technologies tailored to the agroecological, socioeconomic, and cultural complexities of smallholder farming systems. This study, implemented in East and West Africa, used a mixed methodology approach, including a survey and agronomic measurements, to gain insights into farmer learning and nutrient management decision-making, and the outcomes from their participation in OFE processes. For the agronomic assessment, a simple experimental design was employed from 2021 to 2024, whereby smallholder farm-scale fields (0.5–1 ha) were divided into two experimental plots to compare optimized treatment (OT) and a farmer practice (FP). Considerable co-learning between farmers and other stakeholders was observed, particularly in Kenya and Tanzania. There was a positive trend in maize yields over time in the FP treatment, attributed to the involvement of farmers in OFE. Yield improvements of up to 53% were achieved, although profitability was observed only in Côte d'Ivoire. While the scientist-led OT in most cases outperformed the FP, farmers continuously adopted improved nutrient management practices. This highlights the critical role of OFE in scaling PNM by providing a platform to integrate scientific and endogenous knowledge, entrench learning, and scale it by linking to wider innovation systems. OFE also offers precise and relevant data for farmer decision-making on nutrient management drawn from co-designed trials and co-developed agronomic knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abrar Bin Wahid, Md. Rasel Parvej, Md. Enamul Haque Moni, Josh Copes, Md. Moklasur Rahman, Brenda Tubana, Jim Wang
Interest in liquid phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers is increasing, often with claims of superior performance over dry-granular sources. We compared yield and tissue-nutrient responses of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to dry versus liquid P and K. Field trials were conducted from 2021 to 2024 across 42 site-years, including eight corn and six soybean sites, with separate P-only, K-only, and combined P+K trials for each crop. Each trial included a no-fertilizer check and factorial combinations of source (dry vs. liquid) and rate (half vs. full). Triple superphosphate and muriate of potash were dry-fertilizer sources, and ammonium polyphosphate and Nachurs K-fuel were liquid-fertilizer sources. Leaf nutrients were analyzed at V11–V12 (corn) and R2–R3 (soybean) stages, and yield was measured at maturity. In P- or K-deficient soils, corn yield did not differ by sources; however, full-rates increased yield by 5%–13% over half-rates. For soybean, source and rate effects were not significant in single-nutrient trials, whereas in P+K trials, full-rates increased yield by 9%–10% over half-rates. Across environments, yield responses aligned with tissue diagnostics; tissue-K was consistently associated with yield gains, whereas tissue-P was less predictive under common luxury P uptake. Overall, liquid sources provided no advantage over dry-granular sources at equivalent rates. Half-rate liquid did not match full-rate dry yields, and co-applied P+K mirrored single-nutrient responses; yield differences reflected rate, not formulation or synergy. Results emphasize using soil-test-based rates, not formulation, when targeting yield, and tissue-K as a more reliable in-season indicator of crop response than tissue-P.
对液态磷(P)和钾(K)肥料的兴趣正在增加,通常声称其性能优于干颗粒源。我们比较了玉米(Zea mays L.)和大豆(Glycine max (L.))的产量和组织营养响应。稳定。田间试验于2021年至2024年进行,跨越42个站点年,包括8个玉米和6个大豆站点,对每种作物分别进行了单磷、单钾和P+K联合试验。每个试验包括不施肥检查和源(干燥vs.液体)和率(一半vs.满)的因子组合。干肥源为三元过磷酸钾和钾酸盐,液肥源为聚磷酸铵和Nachurs K-fuel。在V11-V12(玉米)和R2-R3(大豆)阶段分析叶片营养成分,并在成熟时测量产量。在缺磷或缺钾土壤中,玉米产量没有因源而异;然而,全利率比半利率增加了5%-13%的收益率。对大豆而言,在单一养分试验中,来源和用量效应不显著,而在磷+钾试验中,全施量比半施量增产9%-10%。在各种环境下,产量反应与组织诊断一致;组织钾始终与产量增加相关,而组织磷在普通奢侈磷吸收下的预测能力较弱。总的来说,在同等速率下,液体源与干颗粒源相比没有优势。半速率液体产量与全速率干产量不匹配,P+K共施反映了单养分的反应;产量差异反映的是比率,而不是配方或协同作用。研究结果强调,在确定产量目标时,应采用基于土壤试验的施用量,而不是配方,而且组织钾比组织磷更能可靠地反映作物的季节性反应。
{"title":"Corn and soybean response to dry versus liquid phosphorus and potassium fertilizers","authors":"Abrar Bin Wahid, Md. Rasel Parvej, Md. Enamul Haque Moni, Josh Copes, Md. Moklasur Rahman, Brenda Tubana, Jim Wang","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70257","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interest in liquid phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers is increasing, often with claims of superior performance over dry-granular sources. We compared yield and tissue-nutrient responses of corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] to dry versus liquid P and K. Field trials were conducted from 2021 to 2024 across 42 site-years, including eight corn and six soybean sites, with separate P-only, K-only, and combined P+K trials for each crop. Each trial included a no-fertilizer check and factorial combinations of source (dry vs. liquid) and rate (half vs. full). Triple superphosphate and muriate of potash were dry-fertilizer sources, and ammonium polyphosphate and Nachurs K-fuel were liquid-fertilizer sources. Leaf nutrients were analyzed at V11–V12 (corn) and R2–R3 (soybean) stages, and yield was measured at maturity. In P- or K-deficient soils, corn yield did not differ by sources; however, full-rates increased yield by 5%–13% over half-rates. For soybean, source and rate effects were not significant in single-nutrient trials, whereas in P+K trials, full-rates increased yield by 9%–10% over half-rates. Across environments, yield responses aligned with tissue diagnostics; tissue-K was consistently associated with yield gains, whereas tissue-P was less predictive under common luxury P uptake. Overall, liquid sources provided no advantage over dry-granular sources at equivalent rates. Half-rate liquid did not match full-rate dry yields, and co-applied P+K mirrored single-nutrient responses; yield differences reflected rate, not formulation or synergy. Results emphasize using soil-test-based rates, not formulation, when targeting yield, and tissue-K as a more reliable in-season indicator of crop response than tissue-P.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}