Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.005
Lan Xia , Wuhong Weng , Jing Wang , Lingyu Dai , Suo Guo , Yanlin Pu , Tao Cai , Peizeng Yang
Objective
To quantify global, regional, and national burdens of blindness and vision loss among females from 1990 to 2021 and to assess age patterns, trends, causes, and risk factors contributing to sex disparities.
Design
Retrospective cohort analysis using publicly available, deidentified data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study.
Participants
Females across 204 countries and territories included in GBD 2021. Sex-specific estimates were analyzed; no identifiable human subjects were involved.
Methods
Deidentified GBD 2021 data were analyzed using R (4.3.2) and Joinpoint regression. Prevalence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs = prevalence × disability weight) were estimated globally and stratified by age, geography, and Sociodemographic Index. Descriptive analyses assessed trends from 1990 to 2021. Mapping illustrated regional distribution and estimated annual percentage change. Cause- and risk-factor analyses followed standardized GBD methods.
Main Outcome Measures
Age-standardized and age-specific prevalence and YLD rates; leading causes; risk-factor–attributable YLDs; and temporal patterns by estimated annual percentage change.
Results
In 2021, females had a 27.1% higher prevalence of blindness and vision loss and a 17.2% higher YLD rate than males. Age-standardized prevalence and YLDs were 14,510.97 and 17,010.96 per 100,000. Burdens were highest in low- and middle-Sociodemographic Index regions. Near vision loss, cataract, and refractive disorders were leading causes; major contributors included air pollution, high BMI, and household air pollution. Women ≥70 years bore the highest disability burden. Joinpoint analysis showed a persistent increase in female YLDs without a clear COVID-19–related inflection. Limitations include modeled estimates and regional data heterogeneity.
Conclusions
Females worldwide continue to experience a disproportionate burden of blindness and vision loss, especially in lower-resource settings and older age groups. Gender-responsive strategies and expanded access to eye care are urgently needed.
{"title":"The Right to Women’s Sight: Global, Regional, and National Burden of Blindness and Vision Loss in Women, 1990 to 2021","authors":"Lan Xia , Wuhong Weng , Jing Wang , Lingyu Dai , Suo Guo , Yanlin Pu , Tao Cai , Peizeng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To quantify global, regional, and national burdens of blindness and vision loss among females from 1990 to 2021 and to assess age patterns, trends, causes, and risk factors contributing to sex disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort analysis using publicly available, deidentified data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Females across 204 countries and territories included in GBD 2021. Sex-specific estimates were analyzed; no identifiable human subjects were involved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Deidentified GBD 2021 data were analyzed using R (4.3.2) and Joinpoint regression. Prevalence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs = prevalence × disability weight) were estimated globally and stratified by age, geography, and Sociodemographic Index. Descriptive analyses assessed trends from 1990 to 2021. Mapping illustrated regional distribution and estimated annual percentage change. Cause- and risk-factor analyses followed standardized GBD methods.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Age-standardized and age-specific prevalence and YLD rates; leading causes; risk-factor–attributable YLDs; and temporal patterns by estimated annual percentage change.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2021, females had a 27.1% higher prevalence of blindness and vision loss and a 17.2% higher YLD rate than males. Age-standardized prevalence and YLDs were 14,510.97 and 17,010.96 per 100,000. Burdens were highest in low- and middle-Sociodemographic Index regions. Near vision loss, cataract, and refractive disorders were leading causes; major contributors included air pollution, high BMI, and household air pollution. Women ≥70 years bore the highest disability burden. Joinpoint analysis showed a persistent increase in female YLDs without a clear COVID-19–related inflection. Limitations include modeled estimates and regional data heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Females worldwide continue to experience a disproportionate burden of blindness and vision loss, especially in lower-resource settings and older age groups. Gender-responsive strategies and expanded access to eye care are urgently needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 227-255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.008
Suraj Bala , Nitesh Mohan , Victor Bellanda , Andrea Arline , Gabriel Castilho S. Barbosa , Matthew Schulgit , Sumit Sharma , Sunil K. Srivastava , Danny A. Mammo , Ananth Sastry
Purpose
To determine if phacoemulsification impacts vitreomacular traction (VMT) release and VMT-related complications.
310 eyes of 249 patients with a concurrent diagnosis of VMT and cataracts at the Cole Eye Institute between 2013 and 2024.
Methods
Eligible eyes had at least 6 months of follow-up post-VMT diagnosis or phacoemulsification. The control group included eyes that did not undergo phacoemulsification after VMT diagnosis. Clinical information was collected via manual chart review. Characteristics of VMT were recorded via review of optical coherence tomography imaging.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was the hazard of VMT release. Secondary outcomes included VMT-related complications, such as macular and lamellar hole formation, retinal detachment, and subsequent vitrectomy.
Results
VMT release occurred in 49.4% of 310 eyes, with an average follow-up period of 136.7 ± 134.4 weeks. There was no significant difference in release between the phacoemulsification and control groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861; P = .380). Among eyes that released, the mean time to release was 79.4 ± 68.8 weeks postsurgery in the phacoemulsification group and 76.0 ± 81.9 weeks from diagnosis in the control group (P = .785). In multivariate analysis, younger age at diagnosis (5-year aHR = 0.773; P < .001) and smaller adhesion diameter (per 100 µm aHR = 0.951; P = .017) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of VMT release. Black patients had a lower likelihood of VMT release compared to White patients (aHR = 0.439; P = .004). Eyes that developed a macular hole had a smaller baseline adhesion diameter than those that did not (439.1 ± 217.9 µm vs 685.7 ± 697.4 µm; P < .001).
Conclusions
Phacoemulsification was not associated with increased rates or faster timing of VMT release. These findings suggest that intrinsic patient and anatomical factors play a larger role in determining the likelihood of VMT release and should be prioritized in clinical decision-making.
目的探讨超声乳化术对玻璃体黄斑牵引力(VMT)释放及相关并发症的影响。设计:单中心、比较、回顾性临床队列研究。研究对象:2013年至2024年间在科尔眼科研究所同时诊断为VMT和白内障的249例患者共310只眼睛。方法符合条件的眼在vmt诊断或超声乳化术后随访至少6个月。对照组为VMT诊断后未行超声乳化术的眼睛。临床资料收集通过手工图表审查。通过回顾光学相干断层成像记录VMT的特征。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为VMT释放风险。次要结果包括vmt相关并发症,如黄斑和板层空洞形成,视网膜脱离,以及随后的玻璃体切除术。结果310只眼vmt释放率为49.4%,平均随访时间136.7±134.4周。超声乳化术组与对照组释放量差异无统计学意义(校正风险比[aHR] = 0.861; P = 0.380)。释放眼中,超声乳化术组平均释放时间为术后79.4±68.8周,对照组平均释放时间为诊断后76.0±81.9周(P = .785)。在多因素分析中,诊断时年龄较小(5年aHR = 0.773; P < .001)和粘连直径较小(每100µm aHR = 0.951; P = 0.017)与VMT释放的可能性较高显著相关。与白人患者相比,黑人患者VMT释放的可能性较低(aHR = 0.439; P = 0.004)。出现黄斑孔的眼睛的黏附直径基线小于未出现黄斑孔的眼睛(439.1±217.9µm vs 685.7±697.4µm; P < .001)。结论超声乳化术与VMT释放率升高或释放时间加快无关。这些发现表明,患者的内在因素和解剖因素在决定VMT释放的可能性方面起着更大的作用,应在临床决策中优先考虑。
{"title":"Impact of Phacoemulsification on Vitreomacular Traction Release and Complications","authors":"Suraj Bala , Nitesh Mohan , Victor Bellanda , Andrea Arline , Gabriel Castilho S. Barbosa , Matthew Schulgit , Sumit Sharma , Sunil K. Srivastava , Danny A. Mammo , Ananth Sastry","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine if phacoemulsification impacts vitreomacular traction (VMT) release and VMT-related complications.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single-center, comparative, retrospective clinical cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects: A total of</h3><div>310 eyes of 249 patients with a concurrent diagnosis of VMT and cataracts at the Cole Eye Institute between 2013 and 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eligible eyes had at least 6 months of follow-up post-VMT diagnosis or phacoemulsification. The control group included eyes that did not undergo phacoemulsification after VMT diagnosis. Clinical information was collected via manual chart review. Characteristics of VMT were recorded via review of optical coherence tomography imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was the hazard of VMT release. Secondary outcomes included VMT-related complications, such as macular and lamellar hole formation, retinal detachment, and subsequent vitrectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VMT release occurred in 49.4% of 310 eyes, with an average follow-up period of 136.7 ± 134.4 weeks. There was no significant difference in release between the phacoemulsification and control groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861; <em>P</em> = .380). Among eyes that released, the mean time to release was 79.4 ± 68.8 weeks postsurgery in the phacoemulsification group and 76.0 ± 81.9 weeks from diagnosis in the control group (<em>P</em> = .785). In multivariate analysis, younger age at diagnosis (5-year aHR = 0.773; <em>P</em> < .001) and smaller adhesion diameter (per 100 µm aHR = 0.951; <em>P</em> = .017) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of VMT release. Black patients had a lower likelihood of VMT release compared to White patients (aHR = 0.439; <em>P</em> = .004). Eyes that developed a macular hole had a smaller baseline adhesion diameter than those that did not (439.1 ± 217.9 µm vs 685.7 ± 697.4 µm; <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Phacoemulsification was not associated with increased rates or faster timing of VMT release. These findings suggest that intrinsic patient and anatomical factors play a larger role in determining the likelihood of VMT release and should be prioritized in clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 176-187"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145731919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.006
Tracy Z. Lang , Khristina I. Lung , Kyle A. Bolo , Brian C. Toy , Benjamin Y. Xu
Objective
To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of acute angle closure (AAC) following dilation in a nationwide healthcare claims database.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Participants
Patients who underwent dilation by an ophthalmologist/optometrist between January 2007 and December 2021 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes for comprehensive eye exam, extended ophthalmoscopy, or dilated fundus exam. Patients with AAC/primary angle closure glaucoma diagnosis before the first dilation were excluded.
Methods
AAC risk was assessed under two definitions. Definition 1 (more sensitive and inclusive): International Classification of Diseases code for AAC glaucoma within 14 days of dilation; Definition 2 (more specific and exclusive): Definition 1 plus CPT code for iridotomy/iridectomy or lens extraction within 14 days of AAC diagnosis. Dilations after the first AAC diagnosis were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with AAC diagnosis by comparing patients who received an AAC diagnosis with those that did not.
Main Outcome Measures
AAC under two definitions based on International Classification of Diseases/CPT codes.
Results
A total of 11,452,733 patients underwent 26,478,250 dilations. The incidence of AAC diagnosis per dilation was 0.01% under Definition 1 and 0.004% under Definition 2. Older age compared to <40 years (OR ≥ 3.26, P < .001), Asian race and Hispanic ethnicity compared to non-Hispanic Whites (OR ≥ 1.38, P < .001), and prior angle closure diagnosis (OR ≥ 12.74, P < .001) conferred higher odds of AAC diagnosis under both definitions. Income ≥$100,000 compared to <$40,000 (OR ≤ 0.83, P < .001), non-Northeast regions (OR ≤ 0.74, P ≤ .002), and pseudophakia status (OR ≤ 0.73, P < .001) conferred lower odds of AAC diagnosis under both definitions. Female sex (OR = 1.19, P < .001), non-HMO insurance (OR ≥ 1.19, P ≤ .006), and Black race (OR = 1.18, P = .003) conferred higher odds of AAC diagnosis under Definition 1.
Conclusions
In a nationwide cohort, the risk of AAC diagnosis following dilation ranged from around 1 in 7,000 to 26,000 dilations. Given the apparent safety of dilation and its importance in comprehensive eye exams and teleretinal care, further discussions regarding concerns about AAC with dilation are warranted.
{"title":"Safety of Pharmacologic Dilation: Incidence and Risk Factors of Acute Angle Closure in a Nationwide Cohort","authors":"Tracy Z. Lang , Khristina I. Lung , Kyle A. Bolo , Brian C. Toy , Benjamin Y. Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of acute angle closure (AAC) following dilation in a nationwide healthcare claims database.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients who underwent dilation by an ophthalmologist/optometrist between January 2007 and December 2021 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes for comprehensive eye exam, extended ophthalmoscopy, or dilated fundus exam. Patients with AAC/primary angle closure glaucoma diagnosis before the first dilation were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>AAC risk was assessed under two definitions. Definition 1 (more sensitive and inclusive): International Classification of Diseases code for AAC glaucoma within 14 days of dilation; Definition 2 (more specific and exclusive): Definition 1 plus CPT code for iridotomy/iridectomy or lens extraction within 14 days of AAC diagnosis. Dilations after the first AAC diagnosis were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with AAC diagnosis by comparing patients who received an AAC diagnosis with those that did not.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>AAC under two definitions based on International Classification of Diseases/CPT codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11,452,733 patients underwent 26,478,250 dilations. The incidence of AAC diagnosis per dilation was 0.01% under Definition 1 and 0.004% under Definition 2. Older age compared to <40 years (OR ≥ 3.26, <em>P</em> < .001), Asian race and Hispanic ethnicity compared to non-Hispanic Whites (OR ≥ 1.38, <em>P</em> < .001), and prior angle closure diagnosis (OR ≥ 12.74, <em>P</em> < .001) conferred higher odds of AAC diagnosis under both definitions. Income ≥$100,000 compared to <$40,000 (OR ≤ 0.83, <em>P</em> < .001), non-Northeast regions (OR ≤ 0.74, <em>P</em> ≤ .002), and pseudophakia status (OR ≤ 0.73, <em>P</em> < .001) conferred lower odds of AAC diagnosis under both definitions. Female sex (OR = 1.19, <em>P</em> < .001), non-HMO insurance (OR ≥ 1.19, <em>P</em> ≤ .006), and Black race (OR = 1.18, <em>P</em> = .003) conferred higher odds of AAC diagnosis under Definition 1.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a nationwide cohort, the risk of AAC diagnosis following dilation ranged from around 1 in 7,000 to 26,000 dilations. Given the apparent safety of dilation and its importance in comprehensive eye exams and teleretinal care, further discussions regarding concerns about AAC with dilation are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 138-148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145731052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.007
Srishti Raksheeth Ramamurthy , Saarang Hansraj , Ragu Kumar , Ritesh Narula , SriniVas R. Sadda , Sobha Sivaprasad , Jay K. Chhablani , Mudit Tyagi , Nikitha Gurram Reddy , Umesh Chandra Behera , Raja Narayanan
Objective
To study the efficacy of brolucizumab in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with persistent fluid without choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM).
Design
Prospective randomized-controlled trial with cross-over design.
Subjects
Patients with chronic CSCR (>3 months duration) without CNVM confirmed on optical coherence tomography angiography were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to treatment or control arms.
Methods
Block randomization with stratification for disease duration and central macular thickness (CMT) was done. Patients in the treatment arm received intravitreal brolucizumab at baseline and then PRN. At 3 months follow-up, patients in the control arm with persistent fluid were crossed over to the injection arm.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was a reduction of CMT on optical coherence tomography >20% compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included proportion of eyes achieving complete fluid resolution at 1 and 3 months, mean change in CMT, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), best-corrected visual acuity, and NEI VFQ-25 scores.
Results
Of 42 patients (42 eyes), 3 were lost to follow-up. Final analysis included 22 patients in injection arm and 17 in control arm. Mean age was 52.3 ± 9.3 years; 92.3% were male. Greater than 20% CMT reduction at 1 month was noted in 17/22 (77.27%) in treatment arm and 6/16 eyes (37.5%) in the control arm (p = .01). At 1 month, 13/22 eyes (59%) achieved complete fluid resolution compared to 2/16 (12.5%) eyes in the control arm (p = .003). At 3 months follow-up, 12/20 eyes (60%) in the treatment arm achieved complete fluid resolution compared to 3/16 eyes (18.75%) in the control arm (p = .01). Mean CMT showed reduction in brolucizumab group compared to control at 1 month (158.16 ± 60 vs 318.22 ± 252.64 µm, p = .001) and 3 months (188.11 ± 78.83 vs 340.75.15 ± 264.52 µm, p = .016). Mean SFCT showed reduction in brolucizumab group compared to control at 1 month (419.53 ± 95.51 vs 472.40 ± 77.43 µm, p = .07) and 3 months (403.47 ± 127.36 vs 490.15 ± 105.50 µm, p = .05). 9 of 11 (81.82%) control eyes after crossover showed fluid resolution with brolucizumab. Change in best-corrected visual acuity and NEI VFQ-25 scores was not significant.
Conclusions
Brolucizumab resulted in rapid resolution of fluid in chronic CSCR without CNVM, associated with significant reduction in CMT and SFCT. Long-term studies will help understand recurrence patterns and adverse effect profile.
目的探讨布卢珠单抗治疗慢性中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)的疗效。前瞻性随机对照试验,交叉设计。受试者纳入经光学相干断层扫描血管造影证实无CNVM的慢性CSCR患者(持续3个月),并随机(1:1)分为治疗组或对照组。方法对病程和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)进行分组随机分层。治疗组患者在基线时接受玻璃体内布卢珠单抗,然后接受PRN。在3个月的随访中,对照组持续积液的患者被转移到注射组。主要结局指标:主要结局是光学相干断层扫描的CMT较基线降低20%。次要结果包括在1个月和3个月时实现完全液体溶解的眼睛比例、CMT的平均变化、中央窝下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)、最佳矫正视力和NEI VFQ-25评分。结果42例(42只眼)中3例失访。注射组22例,对照组17例。平均年龄52.3±9.3岁;92.3%为男性。治疗组17/22只眼(77.27%)和对照组6/16只眼(37.5%)在1个月时CMT下降超过20% (p = 0.01)。1个月时,13/22只眼(59%)获得完全的液体分辨,而对照组为2/16只眼(12.5%)(p = 0.003)。在3个月的随访中,治疗组有12/20只眼(60%)实现了完全的液体溶解,而对照组有3/16只眼(18.75%)实现了完全的液体溶解(p = 0.01)。与对照组相比,brolucizumab组的平均CMT在1个月(158.16±60 vs 318.22±252.64µm, p = 0.001)和3个月(188.11±78.83 vs 340.75.15±264.52µm, p = 0.016)时均有所降低。与对照组相比,brolucizumab组的平均SFCT在1个月(419.53±95.51 vs 472.40±77.43µm, p = 0.07)和3个月(403.47±127.36 vs 490.15±105.50µm, p = 0.05)时均有所下降。交叉治疗后11只对照眼中有9只(81.82%)使用brolucizumab后出现液体溶解。最佳矫正视力和NEI VFQ-25评分变化不显著。结论:在无CNVM的慢性CSCR患者中,brolucizumab可快速解决积液问题,与CMT和SFCT的显著降低相关。长期研究将有助于了解复发模式和不良反应概况。
{"title":"A Randomized-Controlled Trial of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Intravitreal Brolucizumab in Patients With Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy With Persistent Fluid in the Absence of Choroidal Neovascular Membrane—BRICS Trial Report II","authors":"Srishti Raksheeth Ramamurthy , Saarang Hansraj , Ragu Kumar , Ritesh Narula , SriniVas R. Sadda , Sobha Sivaprasad , Jay K. Chhablani , Mudit Tyagi , Nikitha Gurram Reddy , Umesh Chandra Behera , Raja Narayanan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To study the efficacy of brolucizumab in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with persistent fluid without choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective randomized-controlled trial with cross-over design.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Patients with chronic CSCR (>3 months duration) without CNVM confirmed on optical coherence tomography angiography were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to treatment or control arms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Block randomization with stratification for disease duration and central macular thickness (CMT) was done. Patients in the treatment arm received intravitreal brolucizumab at baseline and then PRN. At 3 months follow-up, patients in the control arm with persistent fluid were crossed over to the injection arm.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was a reduction of CMT on optical coherence tomography >20% compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included proportion of eyes achieving complete fluid resolution at 1 and 3 months, mean change in CMT, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), best-corrected visual acuity, and NEI VFQ-25 scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 42 patients (42 eyes), 3 were lost to follow-up. Final analysis included 22 patients in injection arm and 17 in control arm. Mean age was 52.3 ± 9.3 years; 92.3% were male. Greater than 20% CMT reduction at 1 month was noted in 17/22 (77.27%) in treatment arm and 6/16 eyes (37.5%) in the control arm (<em>p</em> = .01). At 1 month, 13/22 eyes (59%) achieved complete fluid resolution compared to 2/16 (12.5%) eyes in the control arm (<em>p</em> = .003). At 3 months follow-up, 12/20 eyes (60%) in the treatment arm achieved complete fluid resolution compared to 3/16 eyes (18.75%) in the control arm (<em>p</em> = .01). Mean CMT showed reduction in brolucizumab group compared to control at 1 month (158.16 ± 60 vs 318.22 ± 252.64 µm, <em>p</em> = .001) and 3 months (188.11 ± 78.83 vs 340.75.15 ± 264.52 µm, <em>p</em> = .016). Mean SFCT showed reduction in brolucizumab group compared to control at 1 month (419.53 ± 95.51 vs 472.40 ± 77.43 µm, <em>p</em> = .07) and 3 months (403.47 ± 127.36 vs 490.15 ± 105.50 µm, <em>p</em> = .05). 9 of 11 (81.82%) control eyes after crossover showed fluid resolution with brolucizumab. Change in best-corrected visual acuity and NEI VFQ-25 scores was not significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Brolucizumab resulted in rapid resolution of fluid in chronic CSCR without CNVM, associated with significant reduction in CMT and SFCT. Long-term studies will help understand recurrence patterns and adverse effect profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 149-162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145731922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.041
Gongpeng Sun,Meixia Zhang
{"title":"Comment on: Cellular-Level Assessment of Macular Development in Patients with FEVR Using Multimodal Imaging: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Gongpeng Sun,Meixia Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145718241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.003
Alexander T. Hong , Forest Lin , Sally Baxter , Robert N. Weinreb
Purpose
Tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), has shown superior efficacy in glycemic control, weight loss, and cardiometabolic outcomes compared to GLP-1 RAs alone. While GLP-1 RAs may offer neuroprotective effects relevant to glaucoma, the impact of dual-incretin therapies like tirzepatide on glaucoma remains unknown. This study investigates the association between tirzepatide initiation and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertension (OHTN), and glaucoma treatment initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compared to those initiating selective GLP-1 RAs.
Design
Retrospective clinical cohort study using a nationwide electronic health records network from June 2022 to May 2025.
Subjects
Adults with T2DM who initiated tirzepatide or selective GLP-1 RA therapy. Patients with prior exposure to either drug class, recent addition of second-line antihyperglycemic agents, previous glaucoma diagnosis or surgery, or ocular trauma were excluded.
Methods
Data from 71 U.S. healthcare organizations were analyzed. Propensity score matching (1:1) was conducted to balance cohorts for demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and ophthalmic encounters. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome.
Main Outcome Measures
Incidence of POAG, OHTN, and first-line glaucoma treatments (medications or surgery).
Results
We identified 41,850 patients who initiated tirzepatide and 147,828 patients who initiated selective GLP-1 RAs. After matching, 41,849 patients remained in each cohort. Tirzepatide use was associated with a significantly lower risk of POAG (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74), OHTN (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.88), and need for glaucoma treatment (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.64) compared to selective GLP-1 RAs. Risk reductions persisted in subgroups with concomitant metformin or insulin use. Sensitivity analyses limited to patients aged ≥60 years and comparisons with individual GLP-1 RAs (semaglutide and dulaglutide) yielded consistent trends.
Conclusions
Tirzepatide use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing POAG, OHTN, and need for first-line glaucoma treatment compared to selective GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2DM. These findings suggest a potential additional ocular benefit of tirzepatide and support further investigation into its role in glaucoma management.
目的:tirzepatide是一种双重葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素性多肽和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA),与单独GLP-1 RAs相比,在血糖控制、体重减轻和心脏代谢结果方面显示出更优越的疗效。虽然GLP-1 RAs可能提供与青光眼相关的神经保护作用,但像替西肽这样的双肠促胰岛素治疗对青光眼的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了替西肽起始与2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、高眼压(OHTN)和青光眼起始治疗风险之间的关系,并与那些起始选择性GLP-1 RAs的患者进行了比较。设计:回顾性临床队列研究,使用全国电子健康记录网络,时间为2022年6月至2025年5月。受试者:接受替西肽或选择性GLP-1 RA治疗的成人T2DM患者。既往使用过任何一类药物、近期使用过二线降糖药、既往青光眼诊断或手术或眼部创伤的患者均被排除在外。方法对美国71家医疗机构的数据进行分析。进行倾向评分匹配(1:1),以平衡人口统计学、合并症、药物使用和眼科就诊的队列。计算每个结局的风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(ci)。主要观察指标POAG、OHTN和一线青光眼治疗(药物或手术)的发生率。结果:41,850例患者接受替西帕肽治疗,147,828例患者接受选择性GLP-1 RAs治疗。配对后,每个队列中仍有41849名患者。与选择性GLP-1 RAs相比,使用替西帕肽与POAG (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74)、OHTN (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.88)和青光眼治疗需求(RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.64)的风险显著降低相关。在同时使用二甲双胍或胰岛素的亚组中,风险持续降低。敏感性分析仅限于年龄≥60岁的患者,并与单个GLP-1 RAs (semaglutide和dulaglutide)进行比较,得出了一致的趋势。结论:与选择性GLP-1 RAs相比,在T2DM患者中使用stirzepatide可显著降低发生POAG、OHTN的风险和一线青光眼治疗的需求。这些发现提示替西肽可能有额外的眼部益处,并支持进一步研究其在青光眼治疗中的作用。
{"title":"Tirzepatide is Associated With Reduced Risk of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Alexander T. Hong , Forest Lin , Sally Baxter , Robert N. Weinreb","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), has shown superior efficacy in glycemic control, weight loss, and cardiometabolic outcomes compared to GLP-1 RAs alone. While GLP-1 RAs may offer neuroprotective effects relevant to glaucoma, the impact of dual-incretin therapies like tirzepatide on glaucoma remains unknown. This study investigates the association between tirzepatide initiation and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertension (OHTN), and glaucoma treatment initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compared to those initiating selective GLP-1 RAs.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective clinical cohort study using a nationwide electronic health records network from June 2022 to May 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Adults with T2DM who initiated tirzepatide or selective GLP-1 RA therapy. Patients with prior exposure to either drug class, recent addition of second-line antihyperglycemic agents, previous glaucoma diagnosis or surgery, or ocular trauma were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 71 U.S. healthcare organizations were analyzed. Propensity score matching (1:1) was conducted to balance cohorts for demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and ophthalmic encounters. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Incidence of POAG, OHTN, and first-line glaucoma treatments (medications or surgery).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 41,850 patients who initiated tirzepatide and 147,828 patients who initiated selective GLP-1 RAs. After matching, 41,849 patients remained in each cohort. Tirzepatide use was associated with a significantly lower risk of POAG (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74), OHTN (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.88), and need for glaucoma treatment (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.64) compared to selective GLP-1 RAs. Risk reductions persisted in subgroups with concomitant metformin or insulin use. Sensitivity analyses limited to patients aged ≥60 years and comparisons with individual GLP-1 RAs (semaglutide and dulaglutide) yielded consistent trends.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tirzepatide use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing POAG, OHTN, and need for first-line glaucoma treatment compared to selective GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2DM. These findings suggest a potential additional ocular benefit of tirzepatide and support further investigation into its role in glaucoma management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145689322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.002
Yu-Min Chang , Ke-Hung Chien , Chi-Jung Wu
Purpose
To evaluate the impact of capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation on refractive outcomes, intraocular lens (IOL) stability, and postoperative complications in high myopic patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025 identified studies comparing cataract surgery with and without CTR implantation in high myopic eyes. The primary outcome was prediction refractive error (PE). Secondary outcomes included absolute refractive error (AE), postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), IOL decentration, anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior capsular opacification (PCO), and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. Random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed.
Results
Nine studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies; 846 eyes) were included. CTR implantation did not significantly affect PE (mean difference [MD], 0.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.07 to 0.08; P = .93) or postoperative CDVA (MD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.06; P = 1.00). However, CTR significantly reduced AE (MD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.20 to −0.05; P = .001) and IOL decentration (MD, −0.04; 95% CI, −0.07 to −0.01; P = .004).No covariates significantly influenced PE in meta-regression.
Conclusions
CTR implantation appears to modestly improve refractive predictability and IOL stability in high myopic eyes without compromising postoperative visual acuity. However, given the limited evidence base and small effect sizes, these findings should be interpreted with caution. CTR implantation may be considered in selected myopic cases with suspected zonular weakness or large capsular bags where additional capsular stability is desired.
{"title":"Capsular Tension Ring Use in High Myopic Eyes Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yu-Min Chang , Ke-Hung Chien , Chi-Jung Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation on refractive outcomes, intraocular lens (IOL) stability, and postoperative complications in high myopic patients undergoing cataract surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025 identified studies comparing cataract surgery with and without CTR implantation in high myopic eyes. The primary outcome was prediction refractive error (PE). Secondary outcomes included absolute refractive error (AE), postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), IOL decentration, anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior capsular opacification (PCO), and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. Random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies; 846 eyes) were included. CTR implantation did not significantly affect PE (mean difference [MD], 0.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.07 to 0.08; <em>P</em> = .93) or postoperative CDVA (MD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.06; <em>P</em> = 1.00). However, CTR significantly reduced AE (MD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.20 to −0.05; <em>P</em> = .001) and IOL decentration (MD, −0.04; 95% CI, −0.07 to −0.01; <em>P</em> = .004).No covariates significantly influenced PE in meta-regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CTR implantation appears to modestly improve refractive predictability and IOL stability in high myopic eyes without compromising postoperative visual acuity. However, given the limited evidence base and small effect sizes, these findings should be interpreted with caution. CTR implantation may be considered in selected myopic cases with suspected zonular weakness or large capsular bags where additional capsular stability is desired.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145689324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.036
Yuichi Hori , Tomoyuki Wada , Kazunori Omatsu
Objective
Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of the TRPV1 antagonist SJP-0132 ophthalmic suspension in patients with dry eye disease.
Design
Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b dose-response study in Japan.
Participants
Outpatients aged ≥20 years with dry eye-related subjective symptoms (eye dryness visual analog scale score ≥40; 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire score ≥6), and objective signs (mean tear-breakup time ≤5 seconds in both eyes; corneal fluorescein staining [CFS] score using Baylor criteria: 2 to 4 for central zone of at least one eye, total score 4 to 20 for all zones, and ≥1 for at least one of the four peripheral corneal regions).
Methods
After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive SJP-0132 ophthalmic suspension 0.1%, 0.3%, or 1.0%, or placebo, administered as 1 drop in each eye four times daily for 4 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 4 in CFS score for all zones with SJP-0132 0.3% vs placebo (primary analysis) and SJP-0132 0.1% or 1.0% vs placebo (secondary analysis).
Results
Total 344 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of SJP-0132 0.1% (n = 87), SJP-0132 0.3% (n = 87), SJP-0132 1.0% (n = 85), or placebo (n = 85). For the primary endpoint, there were no statistically significant differences between the SJP-0132 0.3% and placebo groups (between-group difference −0.8; 95% CI −1.7, 0.2; P = .1181), or between the SJP-0132 0.1% (−0.7; 95% CI −1.8, 0.4; P = .1990) or SJP-0132 1.0% (−0.1; 95% CI −1.3, 1.0; P = .8276) and placebo groups. Secondary endpoints showed generally dose-dependent efficacy and safety of SJP-0132. Improvements in subjective symptoms of dry eye, quality of life, and objective signs were observed after 1 week of SJP-0132 administration and maintained through to week 4, with statistically significant differences to placebo observed at some endpoints. Subgroup analyses suggested greater treatment benefits with SJP-0132 0.3% in subgroups based on baseline ocular characteristics. SJP-0132 was generally well tolerated across the dose groups.
Conclusions
SJP-0132 showed generally dose-dependent efficacy and safety. Based on safety and treatment benefits with SJP-0132 0.3% in the overall population and in subgroups, this dose was considered optimal for further development.
目的评价TRPV1拮抗剂SJP-0132眼液在干眼病患者中的疗效、安全性和最佳剂量。日本随机、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照、2b期剂量反应研究。参与者年龄≥20岁,伴有干眼相关主观症状(眼睛干燥视觉模拟量表评分≥40分;干眼问卷5项评分≥6分)和客观体征(双眼平均泪液破裂时间≤5秒;采用贝勒标准的角膜荧光素染色[CFS]评分:至少一只眼睛中心区评分为2-4分,所有区域评分为4-20分,四个角膜周围区域中至少一个评分≥1分)的门诊患者。方法:在2周安慰剂磨合期后,患者按1:1:1:1:1随机接受SJP-0132眼液0.1%、0.3%或1.0%,或安慰剂,每天4次,每只眼滴1滴,持续4周。主要结局指标主要终点是所有区域从基线到第4周的CFS评分变化,其中SJP-0132与安慰剂相比为0.3%(主要分析),SJP-0132与安慰剂相比为0.1%或1.0%(次要分析)。结果344例患者随机接受至少一剂SJP-0132 0.1% (n=87)、SJP-0132 0.3% (n=87)、SJP-0132 1.0% (n=85)或安慰剂(n=85)治疗。对于主要终点,SJP-0132 0.3%组与安慰剂组之间无统计学差异(组间差异-0.8;95% CI -1.7, 0.2; p=0.1181), SJP-0132 0.1%组(-0.7;95% CI -1.8, 0.4; p=0.1990)或SJP-0132 1.0%组(-0.1;95% CI -1.3, 1.0; p=0.8276)与安慰剂组之间无统计学差异。次要终点显示SJP-0132的有效性和安全性普遍呈剂量依赖性。SJP-0132给药1周后,观察到干眼的主观症状、生活质量和客观体征的改善,并维持到第4周,在某些终点与安慰剂观察到的差异有统计学意义。亚组分析显示,基于基线眼部特征的亚组中,SJP-0132 0.3%的治疗效果更好。SJP-0132在各剂量组均具有良好的耐受性。结论ssjp -0132具有一定的剂量依赖性。基于SJP-0132在总体人群和亚组中的安全性和治疗益处,该剂量被认为是进一步开发的最佳剂量。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of SJP-0132 in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Phase 2b Randomized, Double-Masked, Dose-Finding Study","authors":"Yuichi Hori , Tomoyuki Wada , Kazunori Omatsu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.036","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.036","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of the TRPV1 antagonist SJP-0132 ophthalmic suspension in patients with dry eye disease.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b dose-response study in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Outpatients aged ≥20 years with dry eye-related subjective symptoms (eye dryness visual analog scale score ≥40; 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire score ≥6), and objective signs (mean tear-breakup time ≤5 seconds in both eyes; corneal fluorescein staining [CFS] score using Baylor criteria: 2 to 4 for central zone of at least one eye, total score 4 to 20 for all zones, and ≥1 for at least one of the four peripheral corneal regions).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive SJP-0132 ophthalmic suspension 0.1%, 0.3%, or 1.0%, or placebo, administered as 1 drop in each eye four times daily for 4 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 4 in CFS score for all zones with SJP-0132 0.3% vs placebo (primary analysis) and SJP-0132 0.1% or 1.0% vs placebo (secondary analysis).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total 344 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of SJP-0132 0.1% (<em>n</em> = 87), SJP-0132 0.3% (<em>n</em> = 87), SJP-0132 1.0% (<em>n</em> = 85), or placebo (<em>n</em> = 85). For the primary endpoint, there were no statistically significant differences between the SJP-0132 0.3% and placebo groups (between-group difference −0.8; 95% CI −1.7, 0.2; <em>P</em> = .1181), or between the SJP-0132 0.1% (−0.7; 95% CI −1.8, 0.4; <em>P</em> = .1990) or SJP-0132 1.0% (−0.1; 95% CI −1.3, 1.0; <em>P</em> = .8276) and placebo groups. Secondary endpoints showed generally dose-dependent efficacy and safety of SJP-0132. Improvements in subjective symptoms of dry eye, quality of life, and objective signs were observed after 1 week of SJP-0132 administration and maintained through to week 4, with statistically significant differences to placebo observed at some endpoints. Subgroup analyses suggested greater treatment benefits with SJP-0132 0.3% in subgroups based on baseline ocular characteristics. SJP-0132 was generally well tolerated across the dose groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SJP-0132 showed generally dose-dependent efficacy and safety. Based on safety and treatment benefits with SJP-0132 0.3% in the overall population and in subgroups, this dose was considered optimal for further development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"283 ","pages":"Pages 163-175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.048
Ritu Arora, Daraius Shroff, Sanat Kumar
{"title":"Unilateral Superior Corneal Melts With Iris Prolapse After Retinal Surgery in Rheumatoid Arthritis","authors":"Ritu Arora, Daraius Shroff, Sanat Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.048","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.11.048","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"282 ","pages":"Pages e10-e11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}