Objective: To assess the economics of secondary IOL surgeries, with a focus on variations in day-of-surgery costs based on surgical approach and number of surgeons involved.
Design: Retrospective, time-driven, activity-based costing study analyzing costs and reimbursement rates.
Setting: University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, analyzing procedures performed between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2023.
Participants: Patients undergoing secondary IOL surgeries, including both single- and multi-surgeon cases and procedures without vitrectomy, with anterior vitrectomy, and with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).
Methods: Data were obtained from the institution's Electronic Health Record and Revenue Department secondary IOL surgeries (CPT codes 66985 and 66986) performed over ten years at a single academic institution. Time-driven activity-based costing was applied to calculate the costs associated with each procedure. Primary outcomes were the total cost, reimbursement, and net margins for secondary IOL surgeries. Secondary outcomes were surgical times, time-related costs, and materials costs.
Results: 391 cases were included in this analysis over a ten-year period, including 145 without vitrectomy, 56 with anterior vitrectomy, and 190 with PPV. There was no difference in primary or secondary outcome measures between IOL insertion (CPT 66985) and IOL exchange (CPT 66986). The total day-of-surgery costs were $4248.40-$4447.15 for secondary IOL without vitrectomy, $4245.05-$4600.36 for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy, $5518.52-$5272.21 for single-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV, and $7769.22-$8609.39 for multiple-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV. The calculated Medicare reimbursements were $2771.67-$2901.81 for secondary IOL without vitrectomy, $3005.66-$3155.75 for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy, and $4813.26-$4861.62 for secondary IOL with PPV. Therefore, the net margins were -($1675.48-$1347.59) for secondary IOL without vitrectomy, -($1444.60-$1239.39) for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy, -($704.26-$410.59) for single-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV, and -($3796.13-$2907.60) and for multiple-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV.
Conclusions: All secondary IOL surgeries result in net negative margins with single-surgeon PPV cases having the most favorable reimbursement that covers 87-92% of day-of-surgery costs and multiple-surgeon PPV surgeries having the least favorable with only 56-63% of costs reimbursed. Identifying these cost-intensive procedures offers insights for potential cost-reduction strategies, supporting both economic viability and patient access to necessary eye care.
Purpose: This review evaluated the impact of various public policies on the number of cataract surgeries performed annually by the Public Health System (SUS) in Brazil and its regions. The goal was to provide insights for managers and the medical community to assess the effectiveness of strategies to prevent cataract-related blindness.
Design: Trend studies based on literature review.
Methods: This study was developed through a literature review, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO.
Results: Until the early 2000s, approximately 130,000 cataract surgeries were performed annually in Brazil. In 2001, the National Cataract Campaign (CNC) was introduced, which significantly increased surgical volume by providing unrestricted federal funding. By 2003, the SUS had performed 430,000 surgeries, underscoring the critical role of funding in combating cataract blindness. However, the Ministry of Health discontinued the CNC in 2006, leading to a decline in surgeries in subsequent years. The annual surgical volume recovered to 430,000 only in 2011, following the adoption of new policies that involved directly contracting private companies through government tenders. In 2013, the SUS achieved the minimum number of surgeries required to prevent an accumulation of cataract blindness cases, conducting 530,000 procedures. By the early 2020s, parliamentary amendments directed to specific municipalities through Health Social Organizations became a primary funding source for cataract procedures. This approach proved effective, with approximately 860,000 surgeries performed in 2022 to prevent new accumulations and reduce overall cataract blindness. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted progress, causing a 23% decline in surgeries in 2020. However, surgical rates surged with the relaxation of restrictions in 2021, exceeding prepandemic levels by 21%. By 2022, the number of cataract surgeries increased by 63% compared to the prepandemic average, fully addressing the backlog created during the health crisis.
Conclusion: The increase in surgeries was driven by unlimited federal funding, private contracts, and targeted parliamentary amendments. Despite these efforts, regional disparities persist, requiring equitable policies based on local epidemiological data. Ensuring access to cataract surgery demands sustained public investment. The resilience of Brazil's SUS in the post-pandemic era underscores the need for consistent investments to effectively address healthcare challenges.
Purpose: To objectively assess the long-term corneal epithelial recovery after autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) for ocular chemical burn (OCB)-induced unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).
Design: Prospective, fellow-eye controlled, cross-sectional imaging and diagnostic study.
Subjects: The study included 47 patients, who were 5 to 12 years post-autologous SLET done for OCB-induced unilateral LSCD.
Methods: The donor and recipient eyes of all patients were assessed at a single follow-up visit with slit-lamp biomicroscopy (SLB), in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), impression cytology (IC), anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT), and Scheimpflug imaging (SI). The objective parameters that were assessed were corneal epithelial phenotype (CEP), thickness (CET), reflectivity (CER), and densitometry (CED). Median values with inter-quartile ranges were assessed for all parameters and analyzed using non-parametric tests.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was successful restoration of normal CEP on SLB, IVCM, and IC. Secondary outcome measures were comparison of CET and CER on ASOCT, and CED on SI between the eyes with successful and failed CEP restoration, and donor eyes.
Results: The study analyzed 94 eyes of 47 patients, with a median follow-up of 5.75 years post-SLET. Successful restoration of CEP on SLB, IVCM, and IC was observed in 32 (68%) recipient eyes, while failure was seen in 15 (32%) eyes. The CEP was normal in all 47 (100%) donor eyes. The median CET was similar in healthy donor eyes, eyes with successful CEP restoration (55.9 microns, 50.3-59.2 vs. 57.8, 49.9-63.1; p=0.47) and eyes with failure (57.7 microns, 50.9-66.2; p≥0.59). Although, the median CER (100.72, 89.9-111.2 vs. 121.6, 109.7-139.8; p=0.001) and CED (14.7, 13.4-17.1 vs. 26.5, 20.1-30.2; p=0.02) values were significantly lower in eyes with successful CEP restoration as compared to eyes with failure, they were still significantly greater than corresponding values in the healthy donor eyes for CER (90.33, 84.9-96.9; p=0.02), and CED (13.5, 11.4-15.1; p=0.03), respectively.
Conclusions: Long-term five-to-twelve-year successful restoration of the corneal epithelial phenotype was seen in two-thirds of eyes post-autologous SLET. While corneal epithelial reflectivity, and densitometry were relatively better in eyes with successful outcomes, corneal epithelial thickness was similar in all eyes.