首页 > 最新文献

American Anthropologist最新文献

英文 中文
The social life of illegality: Suspicion and surveillance against African migrants in urban India 非法的社会生活:印度城市对非洲移民的怀疑和监视
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13979
Bani Gill

The turn of the 21st century has witnessed a rising trend of migration from the African continent to cities across India. Accompanying such flows have been racial tensions and policing spectacles, including incidents of violence, vandalism, and evictions against African migrants and their pathologization as “illegal.” These subtle yet pervasive forms of migrant policing by state and citizen actors constitute what I call the social life of “illegality” that is characterized by distinctive modes of suspicion and surveillance. Based upon ethnography conducted in an “unplanned” settlement of Delhi cohabitated by both African and Indian residents, I illuminate how caste-race-religion informed indexes of difference contribute to the multi-sensorial racialization of African migrants as suspicious. In emplacing such dynamics within changing spatial economies and the moral anxieties accompanying such transitions, I further demonstrate quotidian practice of microsurveillance against African migrants as sustaining their position as rent-paying clients who are nonetheless maintained in their racial alterity. The social life of “illegality” thus refocuses attention on the sensorial and emplaced registers that illegalize migrants, above and beyond documentation, thereby furthering a discussion on migrant “illegality” as enmeshed within racialized imaginaries, urban transformations, and alternate modes of governmentality.

进入 21 世纪以来,从非洲大陆向印度各城市移民的人数呈上升趋势。伴随着这种流动的是种族紧张局势和治安奇观,包括针对非洲移民的暴力、破坏和驱逐事件,以及将他们病理化为 "非法"。国家和公民行为者对移民进行的这些微妙而又普遍的治安管理构成了我所说的 "非法性 "社会生活,其特点是独特的怀疑和监视模式。基于在德里一个由非洲和印度居民共同居住的 "计划外 "定居点进行的人种学调查,我阐明了种姓-种族-宗教的差异指数是如何促使非洲移民被多感官种族化为可疑的。通过将这种动态置于不断变化的空间经济和伴随这种转变而来的道德焦虑之中,我进一步展示了针对非洲移民的微观监视的日常实践,这种监视维持了他们作为支付租金的客户的地位,但他们的种族改变性却得以维持。因此,"非法性 "的社会生活将人们的注意力重新聚焦于将移民非法化的感官和位置注册,超越了文件记录的范畴,从而进一步讨论了移民的 "非法性",将其视为种族化想象、城市转型和政府性的另一种模式。
{"title":"The social life of illegality: Suspicion and surveillance against African migrants in urban India","authors":"Bani Gill","doi":"10.1111/aman.13979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13979","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The turn of the 21st century has witnessed a rising trend of migration from the African continent to cities across India. Accompanying such flows have been racial tensions and policing spectacles, including incidents of violence, vandalism, and evictions against African migrants and their pathologization as “illegal.” These subtle yet pervasive forms of migrant policing by state and citizen actors constitute what I call the social life of “illegality” that is characterized by distinctive modes of suspicion and surveillance. Based upon ethnography conducted in an “unplanned” settlement of Delhi cohabitated by both African and Indian residents, I illuminate how caste-race-religion informed indexes of difference contribute to the multi-sensorial racialization of African migrants as suspicious. In emplacing such dynamics within changing spatial economies and the moral anxieties accompanying such transitions, I further demonstrate quotidian practice of microsurveillance against African migrants as sustaining their position as rent-paying clients who are nonetheless maintained in their racial alterity. The social life of “illegality” thus refocuses attention on the sensorial and emplaced registers that illegalize migrants, above and beyond documentation, thereby furthering a discussion on migrant “illegality” as enmeshed within racialized imaginaries, urban transformations, and alternate modes of governmentality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"422-433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13979","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can anthropologists get humor? A collaborative experiment on empathetic knowing at a time of predicaments 人类学家会幽默吗?困境中的移情认知合作实验
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-28 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13980
Jing Xu, Yang Zhan

As a pandemic-era collaborative writing project undertaken amid rising geopolitical tensions, this article demonstrates understanding humor in contemporary China as an ethnographic project leading toward deep, empathetic knowledge at a time when in-person fieldwork became difficult. Through deciphering and translating layered meanings “encrypted” in and intentions signaled by humor in a new comedy program launched in 2021, we dive deep into the lively social life in contemporary China. Humor, via “thick description,” offers valuable insights into life in “fieldsites” that were hard to access during the pandemic time, amid political tensions. It provides a unique lens to examine the unspoken but shared sentiments in societies where humor has become a fundamental mode of public expression. It alerts us to existential anxieties in social life, the subtle voices of social critique, and the yearning for empathy. Humor is not only a valuable object for anthropological inquiry but also a vantage point to reflect on ethnographic methodology and epistemology. We examine humor, with its sentimental and ethical potentialities, and through spontaneous collaboration of mutual support, envision new possibilities in anthropological knowledge production.

作为在地缘政治紧张局势不断加剧的背景下开展的一个大流行病时代的合作写作项目,本文展示了在亲身实地考察变得困难重重的时候,如何将当代中国的幽默理解为一个民族志项目,从而获得深层次的、感同身受的知识。通过破译和翻译 2021 年推出的一档新喜剧节目中的幽默所 "加密 "的多层次含义和意图,我们深入到了当代中国生动活泼的社会生活中。幽默通过 "浓墨重彩的描述",为我们提供了宝贵的洞察力,让我们了解到在政治紧张局势下,大流行时期难以进入的 "田野现场 "的生活。在幽默已成为一种基本的公共表达方式的社会中,它提供了一个独特的视角来审视那些不为人知却又共同的情感。它提醒我们注意社会生活中的生存焦虑、社会批判的微妙声音以及对共鸣的渴望。幽默不仅是人类学研究的重要对象,也是反思人种学方法论和认识论的制高点。我们研究幽默及其情感和伦理潜能,并通过自发的互助合作,展望人类学知识生产的新可能性。
{"title":"Can anthropologists get humor? A collaborative experiment on empathetic knowing at a time of predicaments","authors":"Jing Xu,&nbsp;Yang Zhan","doi":"10.1111/aman.13980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13980","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a pandemic-era collaborative writing project undertaken amid rising geopolitical tensions, this article demonstrates understanding humor in contemporary China as an ethnographic project leading toward deep, empathetic knowledge at a time when in-person fieldwork became difficult. Through deciphering and translating layered meanings “encrypted” in and intentions signaled by humor in a new comedy program launched in 2021, we dive deep into the lively social life in contemporary China. Humor, via “thick description,” offers valuable insights into life in “fieldsites” that were hard to access during the pandemic time, amid political tensions. It provides a unique lens to examine the unspoken but shared sentiments in societies where humor has become a fundamental mode of public expression. It alerts us to existential anxieties in social life, the subtle voices of social critique, and the yearning for empathy. Humor is not only a valuable object for anthropological inquiry but also a vantage point to reflect on ethnographic methodology and epistemology. We examine humor, with its sentimental and ethical potentialities, and through spontaneous collaboration of mutual support, envision new possibilities in anthropological knowledge production.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"434-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13980","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Green peppers, tomatoes, and lemons, disunite!”: Feminist solidarity in times of wars "青椒、西红柿和柠檬,团结起来!":战争时期的女权团结
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13978
Serra Hakyemez, Ozlem Yasak

This article focuses on female bodies co-laboring across the racial lines and academic-activist divides to explore both the potentials and constraints of feminist solidarity in the hyper-masculine and ultra-nationalist normative order of the global war on terror. Anthropological studies have deconstructed phantasmatic narratives of the global war on terror by disclosing its racialized and classed structure. However, what remains understudied is how racialized female bodies are subjected to the biopower and necropower of this war. This ethnography concentrates on the feminist solidarity between Özlem Yasak and Serra Hakyemez, the coauthors of this article, which stretches over 13 years and moves between the colony and the metropole and the Global South and Global North. It examines how a Turkish academic and a Kurdish activist (both lower middle-class women) forge, cultivate, and repair their comradeship as they move from an immigration office to their family house to neoliberal universities. Based on what we call the Other-graphy as a new feminist method, this article argues that the global war on terror expands its reach as the humanitarian and neoliberal regimes of power recruit activists and academics to the fantasy of autonomous subjectivity posited against their possible political solidarity.

本文聚焦于跨越种族界限和学术界与活动家分歧的女性身体,探讨在全球反恐战争的超男性和极端民族主义规范秩序中,女权主义团结的潜力和制约因素。人类学研究通过揭示全球反恐战争的种族化和阶级化结构,解构了全球反恐战争的虚幻叙事。然而,对种族化女性身体如何受制于这场战争的生物权力和死亡权力的研究仍然不足。这篇人种学研究集中探讨了本文的共同作者厄兹莱姆-亚萨克(Özlem Yasak)和塞拉-哈克耶梅兹(Serra Hakyemez)之间的女权主义团结,这一团结持续了 13 年,在殖民地和大都市、全球南方和全球北方之间游走。文章探讨了一位土耳其学者和一位库尔德活动家(均为中下层妇女)如何在从移民局到家庭住所再到新自由主义大学的过程中建立、培养和修复他们的同志关系。本文以我们称之为 "他者书法 "的新女权主义方法为基础,论证了随着人道主义和新自由主义权力体制招募活动家和学者,全球反恐战争的影响范围不断扩大,以自主主体性的幻想来反对她们可能的政治团结。
{"title":"“Green peppers, tomatoes, and lemons, disunite!”: Feminist solidarity in times of wars","authors":"Serra Hakyemez,&nbsp;Ozlem Yasak","doi":"10.1111/aman.13978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13978","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article focuses on female bodies co-laboring across the racial lines and academic-activist divides to explore both the potentials and constraints of feminist solidarity in the hyper-masculine and ultra-nationalist normative order of the global war on terror. Anthropological studies have deconstructed phantasmatic narratives of the global war on terror by disclosing its racialized and classed structure. However, what remains understudied is how racialized female bodies are subjected to the biopower and necropower of this war. This ethnography concentrates on the feminist solidarity between Özlem Yasak and Serra Hakyemez, the coauthors of this article, which stretches over 13 years and moves between the colony and the metropole and the Global South and Global North. It examines how a Turkish academic and a Kurdish activist (both lower middle-class women) forge, cultivate, and repair their comradeship as they move from an immigration office to their family house to neoliberal universities. Based on what we call the Other-graphy as a new feminist method, this article argues that the global war on terror expands its reach as the humanitarian and neoliberal regimes of power recruit activists and academics to the fantasy of autonomous subjectivity posited against their possible political solidarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"509-520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13978","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction - Anthropology and the security encounter: Toward an abolitionist anthropology in the age of permanent war 导言 - 人类学与安全遭遇:人类学与安全遭遇:在永久战争时代走向废除主义人类学
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13977
Zoltán Glück

Anthropologists need to grapple politically with the ways in which security, war and militarization shape our fields of study. This special section of American Anthropologist, “Forever War: Anthropology and the Global War on Terror,” brings together scholars studying, writing and enacting their politics amidst the immense socio-political impacts of the Global War on Terror. In this introductory article, I offer the concept of “the security encounter” to describe the complex and inherently political conditions of doing anthropology within the current conjuncture, as well as a provocation for anthropologists to adopt an abolitionist approach to security, militarization, and permanent war which increasingly structure our lives and work.

人类学家需要在政治上应对安全、战争和军事化如何影响我们的研究领域。美国人类学家》的这一特别栏目 "永远的战争:人类学与全球反恐战争 "汇集了在全球反恐战争的巨大社会政治影响下研究、写作和实施其政治的学者。在这篇介绍性文章中,我提出了 "安全遭遇 "的概念,以描述在当前形势下从事人类学研究的复杂和内在的政治条件,并呼吁人类学家对日益影响我们生活和工作的安全、军事化和永久战争采取一种废除主义的态度。
{"title":"Introduction - Anthropology and the security encounter: Toward an abolitionist anthropology in the age of permanent war","authors":"Zoltán Glück","doi":"10.1111/aman.13977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13977","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropologists need to grapple politically with the ways in which security, war and militarization shape our fields of study. This special section of American Anthropologist, “Forever War: Anthropology and the Global War on Terror,” brings together scholars studying, writing and enacting their politics amidst the immense socio-political impacts of the Global War on Terror. In this introductory article, I offer the concept of “the security encounter” to describe the complex and inherently political conditions of doing anthropology within the current conjuncture, as well as a provocation for anthropologists to adopt an abolitionist approach to security, militarization, and permanent war which increasingly structure our lives and work.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"470-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The forever war, foregone 永远的战争,前功尽弃
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13976
Darryl Li
<p>What is there to say about a war largely consigned to the past without ever having ended? For those who experienced September 11, 2001, as an epochal event, the twentieth anniversary may have seemed more like a millstone than a milestone—a ritual made especially hollow by the recent advent of an even more decisively world-making pandemic.<sup>1</sup> Similarly, the appearance of this not-quite-anniversary collection several years later is a reminder not only of the collective exhaustion that we labor under but of a larger rearranging of priorities—or of proverbial deckchairs in the face of melting glaciers.</p><p>From its inception, cheerleaders and critics of what we can now call the “Forever War” warned that it would not end with the clarity of a surrender ritual or decisive battle. Instead, the Forever War's normalization and its obsolescence seem to have gone hand in hand. On the one hand, it is safe to say that globalized counterinsurgency against an ill-defined “Islamic” terrorist threat no longer enjoys pride of place as a central animating principle of the US imperium, as Washington becomes increasingly preoccupied with both Russia and China. At the same time, the Forever War unquestionably endures: its clearest juridical expression, the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), continues to serve as the legal grounding for military operations from Afghanistan to Syria to Somalia.<sup>2</sup> Legislative discussions focus not on repeal, but on the extent of further expansion. The Forever War's institutional reconfigurations of the American state, including the advent and metastasis of the Department of Homeland Security—a cabinet agency whose budget is second only to the Pentagon's—will remain with us for many years to come. Somehow both forever and yet past, the Forever War may appear as <i>foregone</i>, in that it precedes the world we inhabit and shapes much of what is taken for granted about it.<sup>3</sup> And rather than ever being abolished or abrogated, the Forever War's most likely fate is to simply be superseded in favor of other, even more terrifying, forms of violence.</p><p>Against this temporal morass and the oblivion that it invites, we can plant our feet in this moment and face the closest thing to an event marking a sense of closure: the September 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan. Even after the successful conclusion of a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban, the United States continues to assert a right to project lethal violence into the country from “over the horizon” at will, as it did with the 2022 drone strike that killed al-Qa'ida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. Less spectacular but far more consequential is the US decision to freeze billions of dollars in Afghan central bank assets deposited at the Federal Reserve in New York, a move that has pushed an already impoverished country further into immiseration and potential famine. To speak of the US war on Afghanistan in the past tense notwithstanding
对于一场在很大程度上已成为过去但却从未结束的战争,还有什么可说的呢?对于那些经历过 2001 年 9 月 11 日这一划时代事件的人来说,20 周年纪念与其说是一个里程碑,不如说是一块磨刀石--由于最近出现了一种更具有决定性影响世界的流行病,这一仪式显得尤为空洞。同样,几年后这本并不算周年纪念的文集的出现,不仅提醒了我们所承受的集体疲惫,也提醒了更大范围内优先事项的重新安排--或者说是面对冰川融化时众所周知的躺椅的重新安排。从一开始,我们现在可以称之为 "永远的战争 "的拉拉队长和批评家们就警告说,这场战争不会以投降仪式或决战的明确方式结束。相反,"永恒战争 "的正常化和过时似乎是相辅相成的。一方面,可以肯定地说,随着华盛顿越来越关注俄罗斯和中国,针对定义不明的 "伊斯兰 "恐怖主义威胁的全球化反叛乱行动不再是美国统治的核心激励原则。与此同时,"永远的战争 "无疑仍在继续:其最明确的司法表述--2001 年《使用军事力量授权法》(AUMF)--继续成为从阿富汗到叙利亚再到索马里的军事行动的法律依据。2 立法讨论的重点不是废除,而是进一步扩张的程度。"永远的战争 "对美国国家体制的重构,包括国土安全部--其预算仅次于五角大楼的内阁机构--的出现和蜕变,将在未来许多年与我们同在。在某种程度上,永远的战争既是永恒的,又是过去的,它似乎是注定要发生的,因为它先于我们所居住的世界,并塑造了这个世界的许多理所当然的东西。面对这种时空的泥沼和它所带来的遗忘,我们可以在此刻站稳脚跟,面对一个最接近于终结感的事件:2021 年 9 月美国从阿富汗撤军。即使在与塔利班成功达成撤军协议之后,美国仍继续宣称有权随意从 "地平线 "的另一端向阿富汗投射致命的暴力,2022 年的无人机袭击就击毙了 "基地 "组织领导人埃曼-扎瓦希里。美国决定冻结阿富汗中央银行存放在纽约联邦储备委员会的数十亿美元资产,这一举动虽然不那么引人注目,但却影响深远,它将这个本已贫困的国家进一步推向凋敝和潜在的饥荒。尽管这些暴力形式仍在继续,但以过去时态谈论美国对阿富汗的战争,说明了一场战争的永远和前功尽弃意味着什么。鲁巴伊在其文章中讨论的伊拉克的 "非致命 "杀伤力是通过制裁造成的,是入侵的长期前奏,而不是在入侵之后发生的,这个例子进一步强调了线性或目的论的战争时间性概念的不足。早期的评论--包括发表在本刊同一期上的两篇文章(Abu-Lughod,2002 年;Mamdani,2002 年),随后扩展为颇具影响力的书籍--对公共话语中流行的观念进行了质疑(另见 Asad,2007 年)5 ,并为佐尔坦-格吕克(Zoltán Glück)在本节中所称的 "安全遭遇 "的人类学批判设定了基本参数。在 "永远的战争 "的第二个十年,一波民族志将美国军国主义和安全文化作为主要分析对象(Gusterson, 2016; MacLeish, 2013; Masco, 2014; Wool, 2015)。最近几年(参见拉纳,2011 年),终于出现了一些人种学著作,它们将 "永远的战争 "理论化为一种帝国主义,因此必然是一种跨国组合,其中大部分监禁、酷刑、杀戮和战斗都是由后殖民国家完成的(Al-Bulushi,即将出版;Li,2018 年;Tahir,2017 年)。这种跨国视角在不同尺度上进行思考,也产生了丰富的研究,探讨永恒战争如何在伊拉克(Rubaii, 2022)和阿富汗(Mojaddedi, 2019)等 "官方 "战争制造地,甚至在帝国本身的地理中心(Ghani, 2016; Razavi, 2022)展开。
{"title":"The forever war, foregone","authors":"Darryl Li","doi":"10.1111/aman.13976","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13976","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;What is there to say about a war largely consigned to the past without ever having ended? For those who experienced September 11, 2001, as an epochal event, the twentieth anniversary may have seemed more like a millstone than a milestone—a ritual made especially hollow by the recent advent of an even more decisively world-making pandemic.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; Similarly, the appearance of this not-quite-anniversary collection several years later is a reminder not only of the collective exhaustion that we labor under but of a larger rearranging of priorities—or of proverbial deckchairs in the face of melting glaciers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From its inception, cheerleaders and critics of what we can now call the “Forever War” warned that it would not end with the clarity of a surrender ritual or decisive battle. Instead, the Forever War's normalization and its obsolescence seem to have gone hand in hand. On the one hand, it is safe to say that globalized counterinsurgency against an ill-defined “Islamic” terrorist threat no longer enjoys pride of place as a central animating principle of the US imperium, as Washington becomes increasingly preoccupied with both Russia and China. At the same time, the Forever War unquestionably endures: its clearest juridical expression, the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), continues to serve as the legal grounding for military operations from Afghanistan to Syria to Somalia.&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; Legislative discussions focus not on repeal, but on the extent of further expansion. The Forever War's institutional reconfigurations of the American state, including the advent and metastasis of the Department of Homeland Security—a cabinet agency whose budget is second only to the Pentagon's—will remain with us for many years to come. Somehow both forever and yet past, the Forever War may appear as &lt;i&gt;foregone&lt;/i&gt;, in that it precedes the world we inhabit and shapes much of what is taken for granted about it.&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; And rather than ever being abolished or abrogated, the Forever War's most likely fate is to simply be superseded in favor of other, even more terrifying, forms of violence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Against this temporal morass and the oblivion that it invites, we can plant our feet in this moment and face the closest thing to an event marking a sense of closure: the September 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan. Even after the successful conclusion of a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban, the United States continues to assert a right to project lethal violence into the country from “over the horizon” at will, as it did with the 2022 drone strike that killed al-Qa'ida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. Less spectacular but far more consequential is the US decision to freeze billions of dollars in Afghan central bank assets deposited at the Federal Reserve in New York, a move that has pushed an already impoverished country further into immiseration and potential famine. To speak of the US war on Afghanistan in the past tense notwithstanding","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"521-523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13976","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140675323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pink gold: Women, shrimp, and work in Mexico By María L. Cruz-Torres, Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. 384 pp. 粉红金:玛丽亚-L-克鲁兹-托雷斯(María L.Cruz-Torres)著,奥斯汀:德克萨斯大学出版社,2023 年。384 页。
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13974
Robert R. Alvarez
{"title":"Pink gold: Women, shrimp, and work in Mexico By María L. Cruz-Torres, Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. 384 pp.","authors":"Robert R. Alvarez","doi":"10.1111/aman.13974","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13974","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"544-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140748151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whither book reviews? 书评何去何从?
IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13973
Elizabeth Chin
{"title":"Whither book reviews?","authors":"Elizabeth Chin","doi":"10.1111/aman.13973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13973","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 2","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140541026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Banker, pastor, teef: Christian financial elites and vernaculars of accountability in Ghana 银行家、牧师、TEEF:加纳的基督教金融精英和问责方言
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13969
Anna-Riikka Kauppinen, Girish Daswani

When nine Ghanaian banks collapsed during the country's 2017–2019 financial crisis, a Charismatic Pentecostal pastor was at the center of public accusations as the board chairman of one of the failed banks. His role put a spotlight on the growing influence of Charismatic Pentecostal institutions and elites in Ghana's financial market. Shifting the perspective between diverse actors who reckoned with the bank's collapse, from ordinary Christians to artist-activists, this article explores how Ghanaians evaluated the culpability of the pastor and in so doing problematized who Christian elites involved in banking and business are accountable to: God, their congregants, or the public at large? We argue that global financial liberalization has generated new types of financial elites, Pentecostal pastors among them, who become subject to new lines of accountability. Holding someone accountable comes with stakes expressed through vernacular registers that demonstrate how financial markets are engulfed in broader social relations and regimes of ethical evaluation.

在加纳 2017-2019 年金融危机期间,加纳九家银行相继倒闭,一位灵恩五旬节派牧师作为其中一家倒闭银行的董事会主席,成为公众指责的焦点。他的角色凸显了灵恩派五旬节教派机构和精英在加纳金融市场日益增长的影响力。从普通基督徒到艺术活动家,不同的参与者对银行倒闭事件都有不同的看法,本文在这些参与者之间转换视角,探讨了加纳人如何评价牧师的罪责,并由此提出了参与银行业和商业活动的基督教精英应向谁负责的问题:上帝、他们的信徒还是广大公众?我们认为,全球金融自由化催生了新型金融精英,五旬节派牧师就是其中之一,他们成为新的问责对象。让某人承担责任是有利害关系的,这种利害关系通过方言表达出来,表明了金融市场是如何被更广泛的社会关系和道德评价制度所吞没的。
{"title":"Banker, pastor, teef: Christian financial elites and vernaculars of accountability in Ghana","authors":"Anna-Riikka Kauppinen,&nbsp;Girish Daswani","doi":"10.1111/aman.13969","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13969","url":null,"abstract":"<p>When nine Ghanaian banks collapsed during the country's 2017–2019 financial crisis, a Charismatic Pentecostal pastor was at the center of public accusations as the board chairman of one of the failed banks. His role put a spotlight on the growing influence of Charismatic Pentecostal institutions and elites in Ghana's financial market. Shifting the perspective between diverse actors who reckoned with the bank's collapse, from ordinary Christians to artist-activists, this article explores how Ghanaians evaluated the culpability of the pastor and in so doing problematized who Christian elites involved in banking and business are accountable to: God, their congregants, or the public at large? We argue that global financial liberalization has generated new types of financial elites, Pentecostal pastors among them, who become subject to new lines of accountability. Holding someone accountable comes with stakes expressed through vernacular registers that demonstrate how financial markets are engulfed in broader social relations and regimes of ethical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"408-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13969","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140385979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Segregation made them neighbors: An archaeology of racialization in Boise, Idaho By William A. White III, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2023. 234 pp. 种族隔离使他们成为邻居:爱达荷州博伊西的种族考古学》,William A.White III 著,林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2023 年。234 页。
IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13972
Barbara J. Little
{"title":"Segregation made them neighbors: An archaeology of racialization in Boise, Idaho By William A. White III, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2023. 234 pp.","authors":"Barbara J. Little","doi":"10.1111/aman.13972","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13972","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"542-543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140210441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can women hunt? Yes. Did women contribute much to human evolution through endurance hunting? Probably not. 妇女可以打猎吗?可以。女性的耐力狩猎对人类进化有很大贡献吗?可能没有。
IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1111/aman.13970
Melanie Martin, Alejandra Nuñez de la Mora, Claudia Valeggia, Amanda Veile
<p>A recent article by Ocobock and Lacy (Ocobock & Lacy, <span>2023</span>) argues that human females are “just as, if not more, capable as males at performing arduous physical tasks” and therefore likely to have “meaningfully engaged in hunting during our evolutionary past.” This is a direct challenge to the (generally accepted) canon that gendered subsistence activities are a key feature of the human ecological niche, with men typically contributing more to subsistence via endurance hunting and women through plant and small-prey foraging and other activities more compatible with women's reproductive roles and energetic trade-offs. In support of their argument, Ocobock and Lacy provide a comprehensive and novel review of the aspects of women's skeletal, muscular, and hormonal biology that may confer greater cardiometabolic protection and even enhanced athletic endurance and recovery capabilities relative to men. We agree with the authors that women have been woefully underrepresented in exercise physiology studies, and we hope that their review motivates further research into previously unexamined variation in women's physiological and athletic abilities.</p><p>However, we strongly disagree with a central premise that appears to motivate this scholarship: that the idea of evolved gendered subsistence activities derives largely from incorrect assumptions extrapolated from patriarchal norms today and/or rationalizations of “implicit male superiority” <i>based solely on anatomical gender differences</i>. Such claims are belied by extensive ethnographic and human behavioral ecology research across multiple extant foraging societies. These studies document the near universality of gendered divisions of labor, with women's large-scale participation in hunting occurring only in specific societies (i.e., the Agta) or contexts (i.e., small-game hunting) (Bird, <span>1999</span>; Hoffman, Farquharson, & Venkataraman, <span>2023</span>). We further argue that the review and reconstruction of women's evolved physiological capabilities is overly reliant on, and may misapply, data from Western industrialized populations.</p><p>We also caution that the authors’ methodological approach does not follow the typical structure of a scientific study. Ocobock and Lacy do not state any falsifiable hypotheses or predictions to answer a specific research question, nor do they demonstrate how the physiological evidence presented changes predictions about the impact of human hunting behaviors on <i>biological fitness</i> (survival and reproduction). Rather, the paper is focused on underscoring the reasons why the original interpretations of male-biased hunting are “wrong” (not incomplete), while attempting to demonstrate how flawed the patriarchal view is. It is further rooted in assumptions that <i>hunting is a superior, more-desirable activity</i>, even explicitly stating that women are “relegated to mothering and gathering.” In doing so, the authors conflate ar
奥科博克和莱西(Ocobock &amp; Lacy, 2023)最近发表的一篇文章认为,人类女性 "在完成艰巨的体力任务方面的能力与男性不相上下,甚至有过之而无不及",因此很可能 "在我们进化的过去曾有意义地参与过狩猎活动"。这直接挑战了一个(普遍接受的)信条,即性别生存活动是人类生态位的一个关键特征,男性通常通过耐力狩猎为生存做出更大贡献,而女性则通过植物和小猎物觅食以及其他更符合女性生殖角色和能量权衡的活动。为了支持他们的论点,Ocobock 和 Lacy 对女性骨骼、肌肉和荷尔蒙生物学的各个方面进行了全面而新颖的评述,这些方面可能赋予女性相对于男性更强的心脏代谢保护,甚至是更强的运动耐力和恢复能力。我们同意作者的观点,即女性在运动生理学研究中的代表性严重不足,我们希望他们的综述能激励人们进一步研究女性生理和运动能力中以前未曾考察过的差异。然而,我们强烈反对似乎是这一学术研究动力的一个核心前提:进化的性别生存活动的观点主要来自于从当今父权制规范中推断出来的不正确假设,以及/或仅仅基于解剖学上的性别差异而合理化的 "隐性男性优越性"。在现存的多个觅食社会中进行的大量人种学和人类行为生态学研究否定了这种说法。这些研究记录了性别分工的近乎普遍性,女性大规模参与狩猎只发生在特定的社会(如阿格塔人)或环境(如小猎物狩猎)中(Bird,1999;Hoffman,Farquharson,&amp;Venkataraman,2023)。我们还认为,对女性进化生理能力的回顾和重构过于依赖西方工业化人口的数据,而且可能会误用这些数据。Ocobock 和 Lacy 没有提出任何可证伪的假设或预测来回答具体的研究问题,也没有证明所提供的生理证据如何改变了关于人类狩猎行为对生物适应性(生存和繁殖)影响的预测。相反,论文的重点在于强调对男性偏好狩猎的原始解释 "错误"(而非不完整)的原因,同时试图证明父权制观点的缺陷。这种观点进一步根植于狩猎是一种更优越、更可取的活动的假设,甚至明确指出女性 "只能从事母亲的工作和采集"。作者这样做是将属于不同层面的论点混为一谈,而这些层面并不总是兼容或可比的:道德、意识形态和科学。虽然西方化的个人主义观点可能会将母亲和妇女的家务劳动定位为与其他(通常是男性)经济贡献相比技能较低或较不重要的活动,但大多数研究觅食社会的当代学者以及许多觅食社会中的妇女本身并不认同这种观点。从根本上说,我们同意应该对我们领域中的性别偏见提出质疑,但这不应该被不愿意接受潜在的进化解释可能不同于 "反父权制 "立场可能提出的解释所混淆。我们之所以选择这种方法,是因为我们这些研究人员在研究自然生育人群(现代避孕措施有限)和自给自足规模社会中母婴的行为和生物学方面拥有多年的集体经验。我们的批评并不否认女性在过去从事耐力狩猎的可能性,也不否认基于性别偏见的错误假设已经渗透到我们的领域和其他产生相关知识的领域。我们的目的是强调生殖适宜性是思考、推进和检验人类进化假设的核心--尽管这种方法可能具有挑战性且不完美。从根本上说,当关注女性生物学中赋予身体适宜性优势的特征时,奥科博克和莱西并没有考虑:(1)这种生理机能在生殖适宜性的哪些方面会被选择;或(2)女性从事狩猎相对于其他提高生殖适宜性的无数行为,尤其是在资源有限的环境中,其能量成本和收益是什么。
{"title":"Can women hunt? Yes. Did women contribute much to human evolution through endurance hunting? Probably not.","authors":"Melanie Martin,&nbsp;Alejandra Nuñez de la Mora,&nbsp;Claudia Valeggia,&nbsp;Amanda Veile","doi":"10.1111/aman.13970","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13970","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;A recent article by Ocobock and Lacy (Ocobock &amp; Lacy, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;) argues that human females are “just as, if not more, capable as males at performing arduous physical tasks” and therefore likely to have “meaningfully engaged in hunting during our evolutionary past.” This is a direct challenge to the (generally accepted) canon that gendered subsistence activities are a key feature of the human ecological niche, with men typically contributing more to subsistence via endurance hunting and women through plant and small-prey foraging and other activities more compatible with women's reproductive roles and energetic trade-offs. In support of their argument, Ocobock and Lacy provide a comprehensive and novel review of the aspects of women's skeletal, muscular, and hormonal biology that may confer greater cardiometabolic protection and even enhanced athletic endurance and recovery capabilities relative to men. We agree with the authors that women have been woefully underrepresented in exercise physiology studies, and we hope that their review motivates further research into previously unexamined variation in women's physiological and athletic abilities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, we strongly disagree with a central premise that appears to motivate this scholarship: that the idea of evolved gendered subsistence activities derives largely from incorrect assumptions extrapolated from patriarchal norms today and/or rationalizations of “implicit male superiority” &lt;i&gt;based solely on anatomical gender differences&lt;/i&gt;. Such claims are belied by extensive ethnographic and human behavioral ecology research across multiple extant foraging societies. These studies document the near universality of gendered divisions of labor, with women's large-scale participation in hunting occurring only in specific societies (i.e., the Agta) or contexts (i.e., small-game hunting) (Bird, &lt;span&gt;1999&lt;/span&gt;; Hoffman, Farquharson, &amp; Venkataraman, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). We further argue that the review and reconstruction of women's evolved physiological capabilities is overly reliant on, and may misapply, data from Western industrialized populations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also caution that the authors’ methodological approach does not follow the typical structure of a scientific study. Ocobock and Lacy do not state any falsifiable hypotheses or predictions to answer a specific research question, nor do they demonstrate how the physiological evidence presented changes predictions about the impact of human hunting behaviors on &lt;i&gt;biological fitness&lt;/i&gt; (survival and reproduction). Rather, the paper is focused on underscoring the reasons why the original interpretations of male-biased hunting are “wrong” (not incomplete), while attempting to demonstrate how flawed the patriarchal view is. It is further rooted in assumptions that &lt;i&gt;hunting is a superior, more-desirable activity&lt;/i&gt;, even explicitly stating that women are “relegated to mothering and gathering.” In doing so, the authors conflate ar","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 2","pages":"365-369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13970","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140236920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Anthropologist
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1