This article explores family caregiving in Vietnamese households affected by type 2 diabetes. Drawing on existential phenomenology and on fieldwork conducted in northern Vietnam, I develop the concept of care calibrations as a tool to understand how family members respond socially and morally to the needs for care that diabetes confronts them with. The concept of care calibrations highlights how chronic care is undertaken as an ethical endeavor within domestic environments characterized by multiple care needs. The article explores how caregivers find their bearings in complex care situations by looking toward dominant moral standards while also adjusting pragmatically to the contingencies of domestic lives, placing themselves in others’ situations. On this ethnographic basis, the article calls for more sustained anthropological attention to the social implications of human capacities for sympathetic co-living and particularly to the intermediate realm between selves and others where capacities for moral imagination reside.
{"title":"Calibrating care: Family caregiving and the social weight of sympathy (tình cảm) in Vietnam","authors":"Tine M. Gammeltoft","doi":"10.1111/aman.13993","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13993","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores family caregiving in Vietnamese households affected by type 2 diabetes. Drawing on existential phenomenology and on fieldwork conducted in northern Vietnam, I develop the concept of care calibrations as a tool to understand how family members respond socially and morally to the needs for care that diabetes confronts them with. The concept of care calibrations highlights how chronic care is undertaken as an ethical endeavor within domestic environments characterized by multiple care needs. The article explores how caregivers find their bearings in complex care situations by looking toward dominant moral standards while also adjusting pragmatically to the contingencies of domestic lives, placing themselves in others’ situations. On this ethnographic basis, the article calls for more sustained anthropological attention to the social implications of human capacities for sympathetic co-living and particularly to the intermediate realm between selves and others where capacities for moral imagination reside.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 4","pages":"596-607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13993","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141672168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Anthropology is a discipline that is always in a state of transition and becoming, but the current moment has a sense of being a tipping point, a crisis, a sea change. Whether a case for letting anthropology burn (Jobson, <span>2020</span>) or a call to decolonize anthropology (Gupta & Stoolman, <span>2022</span>), the conversations happening in the field are coalescing around the need for change at a scale we have rarely faced before. In the current reality, people are desperate for futurities beyond late modernity, beyond the climate crisis, beyond the crush of neoliberal capitalism, beyond the ongoing violences of colonialism, and beyond the limits of Western knowledge. Emerging from the chrysalis of the COVID-19 pandemic, a powerful need for some sense of collective care for humanity as we face an uncertain future has resonated across the discipline (d'Alpoim Guedes et al., <span>2021</span>). As a discipline that claims the study of humanity and promotion of cross-cultural understanding at our core, this moment should be a time when anthropology can be more relevant and meaningful than ever. But as tides of hate rise around us, we are struggling, sometimes flailing, sometimes failing, to make sense of our role in a different future when faced with necessary change (e.g., Joyce, <span>2021</span>; Nelson, <span>2021b</span>). In the face of a cataclysmic climate crisis and increasing global conflict, an insecurity about what a radical reimagining and reorientation of anthropology might mean permeates disciplinary discourse (A. Gupta & Stoolman, <span>2022</span>; Lewis, <span>2023</span>; Pierre, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>No accounting of an imagined future is possible without a reflection on how the past influences the present (Pels, <span>2015</span>). In this paper, I offer my perspective on what this moment means, first by reminding us of our collective disciplinary truths before offering an example of an anthropology of restitution and restorative justice drawn from my own work as an Indigenous archaeologist. My perspective is grounded in my position as a Métis woman, an anthropological archaeologist, a mother, and someone with deep responsibilities to my relatives in the lands we now call Canada (Supernant, <span>2020a</span>). While I will tell some difficult truths in this paper, it is my sincere hope that when facing down the specter of transition, we see possibilities, not insurmountable barriers. We see different possible futures, not the bleakness of the apocalyptic void. But truth first.</p><p>Transition requires a reckoning with the truth. Without a reckoning, the past becomes a tether, tying our collective discipline to a legacy from which we cannot break free. Transition invites a release: a surrender of that which no longer serves our vision of what we wish to become. I am not the first to call for a reckoning, nor will I be the last. Many voices at the margins of anthropology and our allies have been telling diffi
因此,在开始工作之前,促进这些社区之间的联系对于确保每个人都了解情况并参与寻找失踪儿童至关重要。地球物理结果的交流也是一个问题,T'kemlpus te Sewepmec 不准确的媒体报道以及不同社区在报告结果时的不一致加剧了这一问题(Wadsworth et al.否认主义正在兴起,试图破坏我们的努力(Carleton,2021 年;Supernant & Carleton,2022 年)。有些人试图淡化尸体的严重性,甚至否认尸体的存在,这促使我们必须反驳这种错误的说法(Supernant & Carleton, 2022)。我们并不是要证明儿童死亡。我们知道他们死了。社区和幸存者也知道他们死了。NCTR 记录了数千名死亡儿童的姓名。考古学家试图做的是提供这些儿童坟墓的位置,并为幸存者几十年来一直分享的真相提供另一种证据支持。我们正在利用我们作为考古学家的技能,努力为伸张正义和追究责任的呼声助一臂之力。我们的工作重点是尊重土著社区对自己过去所持有的价值观,最终努力实现正义。考古学在解决这些关键问题方面可以发挥作用,帮助收集证据,支持社区寻求赔偿(Montgomery & Supernant, 2022)。许多社区希望收集幸存者的证词,但却没有进行口述历史访谈的经验。我们的许多社区合作伙伴都曾向我的团队询问如何进行访谈,我们也会尽最大努力为他们联系人类学家,但肯定还需要更多的资源来支持这项社区工作。还有一个一直存在的问题是,地球物理结果发现潜在的无名墓后该怎么办。一些社区正在考虑进行法医调查,但由于种种原因,这仍然是一个充满争议的问题。如果社区决定走这条路,生物人类学家将发挥作用,支持土著社区完成这项痛苦的任务。长老们在举行仪式时,总是会指派帮手来减轻任务。在我看来,考古学家以及所有人类学家都是潜在的助手。但是,这种情况下,你不可能出现在一个社区,然后告诉他们你要去帮忙。你需要建立尊重和信任的关系,看看你的技能能否为他们服务。让我感到振奋的是,下一代学生渴望参与此类工作。对他们来说,这不仅仅是一种学术追求;他们的动力是实现有意义的改变,为不同的社区做出积极贡献。在过去的几年里,我一直在帮助寻找在种族屠杀中死去的儿童的坟墓(Raycraft,2022 年)。在这个过程中,我清楚地认识到自己也是种族屠杀的幸存者。我的父亲在寄养系统中幸存下来,我的曾祖母在寄宿学校中幸存下来,这些都是一个奇迹。它让我能够来到这里,继续讲述发生在我的社区的痛苦而艰难的真相,并确保它不会再次发生。作为种族灭绝殖民暴力的幸存者,我可以告诉你们,以暴易暴只会造成更大的伤害。作为人类学家,我们必须维护我们共同的集体人性,谴责一切形式的种族灭绝。即使在我们的社会弥漫着生存恐惧感和末日来临的时候,我仍然对未来充满希望,因为我相信我们的集体力量和复原力。今天,我站在这里向你们发表演讲,这一事实本身就反映了一个与早期人类学家所设想的任何未来都不同的未来。他们不会想到,在他们 "拯救 "我们的文化知识(因为我们注定要消失)一百多年后,我们作为土著人仍然在这里,我们仍然拥有我们的许多歌曲、仪式、舞蹈和传统,我们仍然与土地和彼此有着深厚的联系。寄宿学校和类似政策的设计者也认为我们注定会消失,会变得和他们一样,如果我们屈服于殖民主义和种族灭绝,我们会过得更好。但我们没有这样做。我们活了下来。我们坚韧不拔。我们仍在这里。
{"title":"Truth before transition: Reimagining anthropology as restorative justice","authors":"Kisha Supernant","doi":"10.1111/aman.13992","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13992","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropology is a discipline that is always in a state of transition and becoming, but the current moment has a sense of being a tipping point, a crisis, a sea change. Whether a case for letting anthropology burn (Jobson, <span>2020</span>) or a call to decolonize anthropology (Gupta & Stoolman, <span>2022</span>), the conversations happening in the field are coalescing around the need for change at a scale we have rarely faced before. In the current reality, people are desperate for futurities beyond late modernity, beyond the climate crisis, beyond the crush of neoliberal capitalism, beyond the ongoing violences of colonialism, and beyond the limits of Western knowledge. Emerging from the chrysalis of the COVID-19 pandemic, a powerful need for some sense of collective care for humanity as we face an uncertain future has resonated across the discipline (d'Alpoim Guedes et al., <span>2021</span>). As a discipline that claims the study of humanity and promotion of cross-cultural understanding at our core, this moment should be a time when anthropology can be more relevant and meaningful than ever. But as tides of hate rise around us, we are struggling, sometimes flailing, sometimes failing, to make sense of our role in a different future when faced with necessary change (e.g., Joyce, <span>2021</span>; Nelson, <span>2021b</span>). In the face of a cataclysmic climate crisis and increasing global conflict, an insecurity about what a radical reimagining and reorientation of anthropology might mean permeates disciplinary discourse (A. Gupta & Stoolman, <span>2022</span>; Lewis, <span>2023</span>; Pierre, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>No accounting of an imagined future is possible without a reflection on how the past influences the present (Pels, <span>2015</span>). In this paper, I offer my perspective on what this moment means, first by reminding us of our collective disciplinary truths before offering an example of an anthropology of restitution and restorative justice drawn from my own work as an Indigenous archaeologist. My perspective is grounded in my position as a Métis woman, an anthropological archaeologist, a mother, and someone with deep responsibilities to my relatives in the lands we now call Canada (Supernant, <span>2020a</span>). While I will tell some difficult truths in this paper, it is my sincere hope that when facing down the specter of transition, we see possibilities, not insurmountable barriers. We see different possible futures, not the bleakness of the apocalyptic void. But truth first.</p><p>Transition requires a reckoning with the truth. Without a reckoning, the past becomes a tether, tying our collective discipline to a legacy from which we cannot break free. Transition invites a release: a surrender of that which no longer serves our vision of what we wish to become. I am not the first to call for a reckoning, nor will I be the last. Many voices at the margins of anthropology and our allies have been telling diffi","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"396-407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13992","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141679718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In an era marked by heightened globalization and climate crisis, the proliferation of alien or invasive species has emerged as a critical issue. This article delves into the contentious debates surrounding strategies for addressing these species, offering insights into divergent visions of “environmental futures” and the intricate interplay of concern, risk, and power relations in the Anthropocene. Through ethnographic research, the article scrutinizes discourses and practices related to the preservation of sabras, recent immigrants from the Americas that have become emblematic in Israel/Palestine, symbolizing a shared connection to the land for Jews and Palestinians. The primary focus is on efforts to protect sabras from an invasive insect threat, which involves introducing a “natural enemy” to combat the intruder, sparking controversy among scientists and stakeholders. By employing the concept of “Anthropocene concern,” the article unveils the anxieties of various actors regarding nonhuman entities and demonstrates how these perceptions drive human actions or inaction. Despite the temptation to associate the political struggle only with the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, the article shows the importance of analyzing the political–scientific struggle around the appropriate approach to dealing with invasive species and how emotions, politics, and science are intertwined at different levels, requiring careful analysis and interpretation.
{"title":"Invasive species or legal alien? Confrontation and controversy in protecting sabras in Israel","authors":"Liron Shani","doi":"10.1111/aman.13994","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13994","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an era marked by heightened globalization and climate crisis, the proliferation of alien or invasive species has emerged as a critical issue. This article delves into the contentious debates surrounding strategies for addressing these species, offering insights into divergent visions of “environmental futures” and the intricate interplay of concern, risk, and power relations in the Anthropocene. Through ethnographic research, the article scrutinizes discourses and practices related to the preservation of sabras, recent immigrants from the Americas that have become emblematic in Israel/Palestine, symbolizing a shared connection to the land for Jews and Palestinians. The primary focus is on efforts to protect sabras from an invasive insect threat, which involves introducing a “natural enemy” to combat the intruder, sparking controversy among scientists and stakeholders. By employing the concept of “Anthropocene concern,” the article unveils the anxieties of various actors regarding nonhuman entities and demonstrates how these perceptions drive human actions or inaction. Despite the temptation to associate the political struggle only with the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, the article shows the importance of analyzing the political–scientific struggle around the appropriate approach to dealing with invasive species and how emotions, politics, and science are intertwined at different levels, requiring careful analysis and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 4","pages":"608-621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13994","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141680017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As we continue to define anthropology for the 21st century, I argue that ethics—what we mean by ethics, how we invoke ethics, and how we demonstrate our ethics—should be at the center of our conversation. Through this presidential address, I offer a challenge to center an ethics of care in our work that derives not from the Common Rule or broad policies of US institutions, but rather is derived from our responsibility for the impact of our actions, whether intentional or unintentional, and is situated in the moral narratives of the communities that we serve.
{"title":"When do no harm becomes harm done: Re-centering ethics in anthropology","authors":"Ramona L. Pérez","doi":"10.1111/aman.13990","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13990","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As we continue to define anthropology for the 21st century, I argue that ethics—what we mean by ethics, how we invoke ethics, and how we demonstrate our ethics—should be at the center of our conversation. Through this presidential address, I offer a challenge to center an ethics of care in our work that derives not from the Common Rule or broad policies of US institutions, but rather is derived from our responsibility for the impact of our actions, whether intentional or unintentional, and is situated in the moral narratives of the communities that we serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"388-395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13990","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141354635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Plantation life: Corporate occupation in Indonesia's oil palm zone By Tania Murray Li and Pujo Semedi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2021. 256 pp.","authors":"Joshua Barkan","doi":"10.1111/aman.13983","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13983","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"538-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141367800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Architectures of hope: Infrastructural citizenship and class mobility in Brazil's public housing By Moisés Kopper. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2022. 362 pp.","authors":"Alessandro M. Angelini","doi":"10.1111/aman.13989","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13989","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"540-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141367666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the role of humor in obfuscating social hierarchy? This article describes how caste prejudices among male taxi drivers in Uttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas are enacted through the humor of calling each other “funny” names. Such humor is directed toward Dalit drivers whose proper first names are replaced by “funny” names that caricature their personal attributes as an index of their “lower-caste” identity without addressing it directly. Given the conditions of social change in the practice of caste across India, calling such names provides the “upper-caste” drivers grounds for the disavowability of addressing caste. Calling Dalit drivers funny first names at the taxi stand eschews addressing directly the collective lower-caste identity indexed in their last names even as the humor so enacted becomes the premise for identifying their caste identity. It exceeds and bypasses legalized notions of caste atrocity by distorting personal attributes into humorous name-calling that is indexically removed from the denigration of collective caste identity that can be disavowed. This article offers an ethnography of humor to understand how humorous sociability becomes the means for addressing lower-caste identity while simultaneously providing the grounds for its obfuscation and disavowal.
{"title":"Calling names: Humoring caste and caste-ing humor","authors":"Bhoomika Joshi","doi":"10.1111/aman.13984","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13984","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What is the role of humor in obfuscating social hierarchy? This article describes how caste prejudices among male taxi drivers in Uttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas are enacted through the humor of calling each other “funny” names. Such humor is directed toward Dalit drivers whose proper first names are replaced by “funny” names that caricature their personal attributes as an index of their “lower-caste” identity without addressing it directly. Given the conditions of social change in the practice of caste across India, calling such names provides the “upper-caste” drivers grounds for the disavowability of addressing caste. Calling Dalit drivers funny first names at the taxi stand eschews addressing directly the collective lower-caste identity indexed in their last names even as the humor so enacted becomes the premise for identifying their caste identity. It exceeds and bypasses legalized notions of caste atrocity by distorting personal attributes into humorous name-calling that is indexically removed from the denigration of collective caste identity that can be disavowed. This article offers an ethnography of humor to understand how humorous sociability becomes the means for addressing lower-caste identity while simultaneously providing the grounds for its obfuscation and disavowal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"446-457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141374872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rooting in a useless land: Ancient farmers, celebrity chefs, and environmental justice in Yucatán By Chelsea Fisher, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2023. 280 pp.","authors":"Brent Woodfill","doi":"10.1111/aman.13982","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13982","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"536-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140964804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article lays out the work of Costs of War, a project of scholars creating public-facing knowledge toward the goal of challenging US militarism. Emerging from literature that critiques US imperial violence and deconstructs the commonplace understandings that support it, our efforts identify and confront pillars of belief about war that are shaped by the powerful military-industrial complex and rooted in an underlying devaluation of the lives of Muslims, people of color, women, and oppressed groups who bear the brunt of militarization both at home and abroad. We use our research and associated website (costsofwar.org) to reach out to journalists, editors, Congress, policymakers, civic groups, social movements, and the US public. In contesting the soundbites about the post-9/11 wars that allow these wars to be seen as inevitable and to continue uncontested, we hope to help avert the next war championed by those least likely to live with the horrific and decades-long consequences. We describe our approach, its successes, and its stumbling blocks in hope of offering insights for scholars in the social sciences who wish to use their research in service of activist goals and social justice movements, antiwar and beyond.
يعرض هذا المقال أعمال مشروع “تكاليف الحرب،” وهو مشروع يضم أكاديميين يعملون على بناء معرفة موجهة للجمهور في سبيل تحدي النزوع العسكري للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية. إن عملنا، المنبثق عن التراث الفكري المنتقد للعنف الإمبريالي الأمريكي والذي يفكك الفهم السائد الذي يدعمه، يعرّف ويواجه مرتكزات المعتقد المتعلق بحرب يشكلها المجمع الصناعي العسكري القوي وتمد بجذورها في الاستهانة الكامنة بحيوات المسلمين، والملونين، والنساء، والمجموعات المقهورة والذين يحتملون -في مجموعهم- تبعات العسكرة إن كان في الديار أو في الخارج. نحن نستخدم بحثنا وموقع الانترنت المرتبط بنا (costofwar.org) في التواصل مع صحفيين ومحررين وأعضاء في الكونجرس وصناع سياسات ومجموعات مدنية وحركات اجتماعية وعامة الجمهور الأمريكي. في طعننا في العبارات الرنانة التي صدرت حول حروب ما بعد الحادي عشر من سبتمبر، والتي تمكن هذه الحروب من أن ترى باعتبارها محتومة ومن البقاء دون مراجعة، نطمح إلى أن نساعد في تجنب الحرب المقبلة والمؤيدة من قبل أولئك الذين لن يضطروا على الأغلب للحياة في ظل التبعات المرعبة التي ستستمر لعقود. إننا نصف نهجنا ، بنجاحاته والعقبات المعيقة له، على أمل تقديم رؤى للأكاديميين في مجال العلوم الاجتماعية الذين يأملون في استخدام بحثهم في بلوغ أهداف ناشطية، وحركات العدالة الاجتماعية ومناهضة الحرب، وغير ذلك.
{"title":"The costs of war: Lessons from a public scholarship project on the post-9/11 wars","authors":"Stephanie Savell, Catherine Lutz","doi":"10.1111/aman.13975","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.13975","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article lays out the work of Costs of War, a project of scholars creating public-facing knowledge toward the goal of challenging US militarism. Emerging from literature that critiques US imperial violence and deconstructs the commonplace understandings that support it, our efforts identify and confront pillars of belief about war that are shaped by the powerful military-industrial complex and rooted in an underlying devaluation of the lives of Muslims, people of color, women, and oppressed groups who bear the brunt of militarization both at home and abroad. We use our research and associated website (costsofwar.org) to reach out to journalists, editors, Congress, policymakers, civic groups, social movements, and the US public. In contesting the soundbites about the post-9/11 wars that allow these wars to be seen as inevitable and to continue uncontested, we hope to help avert the next war championed by those least likely to live with the horrific and decades-long consequences. We describe our approach, its successes, and its stumbling blocks in hope of offering insights for scholars in the social sciences who wish to use their research in service of activist goals and social justice movements, antiwar and beyond.</p><p>يعرض هذا المقال أعمال مشروع “تكاليف الحرب،” وهو مشروع يضم أكاديميين يعملون على بناء معرفة موجهة للجمهور في سبيل تحدي النزوع العسكري للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية. إن عملنا، المنبثق عن التراث الفكري المنتقد للعنف الإمبريالي الأمريكي والذي يفكك الفهم السائد الذي يدعمه، يعرّف ويواجه مرتكزات المعتقد المتعلق بحرب يشكلها المجمع الصناعي العسكري القوي وتمد بجذورها في الاستهانة الكامنة بحيوات المسلمين، والملونين، والنساء، والمجموعات المقهورة والذين يحتملون -في مجموعهم- تبعات العسكرة إن كان في الديار أو في الخارج. نحن نستخدم بحثنا وموقع الانترنت المرتبط بنا (costofwar.org) في التواصل مع صحفيين ومحررين وأعضاء في الكونجرس وصناع سياسات ومجموعات مدنية وحركات اجتماعية وعامة الجمهور الأمريكي. في طعننا في العبارات الرنانة التي صدرت حول حروب ما بعد الحادي عشر من سبتمبر، والتي تمكن هذه الحروب من أن ترى باعتبارها محتومة ومن البقاء دون مراجعة، نطمح إلى أن نساعد في تجنب الحرب المقبلة والمؤيدة من قبل أولئك الذين لن يضطروا على الأغلب للحياة في ظل التبعات المرعبة التي ستستمر لعقود. إننا نصف نهجنا ، بنجاحاته والعقبات المعيقة له، على أمل تقديم رؤى للأكاديميين في مجال العلوم الاجتماعية الذين يأملون في استخدام بحثهم في بلوغ أهداف ناشطية، وحركات العدالة الاجتماعية ومناهضة الحرب، وغير ذلك.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"479-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140995220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gordon Mathews, Gonzalo Díaz Crovetto, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, P.-j. Ezeh, Shannon Morreira, Yasmeen Arif, Chen Gang, Takami Kuwayama
<p>In January 2022, the World Council of Anthropological Associations Task Force “Making Anthropology Global” was formed, consisting of Gonzalo Díaz Crovetto, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, P.-j. Ezeh, Shannon Morreira, Yasmeen Arif, Chen Gang, Gordon Mathews (chairperson), and Takami Kuwayama, reporting on Chile, Norway, Nigeria, South Africa. India, China, Hong Kong, and Japan. The task force met via Zoom once a month during 2022 and early 2023, with assignments after each meeting, whereby members wrote about the situation of anthropologists in their own societies.</p><p>Initially, the task force focused on the impact of citation indexes such as the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) on promotion practices for anthropologists in our different societies. As Kuwayama (<span>2017</span>, 162−63) writes, “as of April 2017, a total of 82 journals are listed in SSCI under the category of anthropology. . . . Of these, the US accounts for 38, the UK 21, Germany 6, Australia 3, the Netherlands, 3, Chile, 2, France 2, Spain 2, Argentina 1, Italy 1, New Zealand 1, Slovenia 1, and Switzerland 1.” This situation is essentially unchanged in the years since, with Anglo-American hegemony an indisputable fact in anthropological journal publishing. However, as we proceeded in our work, we soon realized that SSCI was only one factor in how anthropologists were being evaluated, and so we began to examine the more general situations of anthropologists in our different societies. This brief report summarizes our findings in terms of publication expectations, citation indexes, language usage, and promotional criteria among anthropologists in the eight different societies we represent and also offers our recommendations. A significant limitation of this report is that it covers a small range of societies, albeit from a wide geographic range around the world, and we hope in the future to expand these to cover all the world, but we do sense that the diversity of the societies we represent offers at least the start of a global profile. We begin by providing a country-by-country report. We then provide a comparison of the different issues raised in these reports. Finally, we arrive at a few suggestions for how global problems in publication, language, promotion, and other issues might be alleviated.</p><p>In what follows, we present key points both from the preceding profiles of anthropological publishing and evaluation in different societies and from the longer document we produced as a task force.</p><p>The following are broad criteria that we have all come to agree upon within our task force. We are well aware that their adoption may be a pipe dream, but we offer them in the spirit of provoking discussion and perhaps expanding imaginations as to what might be possible.</p><p>(1) Some form of evaluation of anthropology professors seems inevitable. The earlier situations of Japan and China, where seniority was effectively the only grounds for promotion, is broadly untenable.
{"title":"Comparing the situations of anthropologists around the world as to publication and evaluation criteria","authors":"Gordon Mathews, Gonzalo Díaz Crovetto, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, P.-j. Ezeh, Shannon Morreira, Yasmeen Arif, Chen Gang, Takami Kuwayama","doi":"10.1111/aman.13981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13981","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In January 2022, the World Council of Anthropological Associations Task Force “Making Anthropology Global” was formed, consisting of Gonzalo Díaz Crovetto, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, P.-j. Ezeh, Shannon Morreira, Yasmeen Arif, Chen Gang, Gordon Mathews (chairperson), and Takami Kuwayama, reporting on Chile, Norway, Nigeria, South Africa. India, China, Hong Kong, and Japan. The task force met via Zoom once a month during 2022 and early 2023, with assignments after each meeting, whereby members wrote about the situation of anthropologists in their own societies.</p><p>Initially, the task force focused on the impact of citation indexes such as the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) on promotion practices for anthropologists in our different societies. As Kuwayama (<span>2017</span>, 162−63) writes, “as of April 2017, a total of 82 journals are listed in SSCI under the category of anthropology. . . . Of these, the US accounts for 38, the UK 21, Germany 6, Australia 3, the Netherlands, 3, Chile, 2, France 2, Spain 2, Argentina 1, Italy 1, New Zealand 1, Slovenia 1, and Switzerland 1.” This situation is essentially unchanged in the years since, with Anglo-American hegemony an indisputable fact in anthropological journal publishing. However, as we proceeded in our work, we soon realized that SSCI was only one factor in how anthropologists were being evaluated, and so we began to examine the more general situations of anthropologists in our different societies. This brief report summarizes our findings in terms of publication expectations, citation indexes, language usage, and promotional criteria among anthropologists in the eight different societies we represent and also offers our recommendations. A significant limitation of this report is that it covers a small range of societies, albeit from a wide geographic range around the world, and we hope in the future to expand these to cover all the world, but we do sense that the diversity of the societies we represent offers at least the start of a global profile. We begin by providing a country-by-country report. We then provide a comparison of the different issues raised in these reports. Finally, we arrive at a few suggestions for how global problems in publication, language, promotion, and other issues might be alleviated.</p><p>In what follows, we present key points both from the preceding profiles of anthropological publishing and evaluation in different societies and from the longer document we produced as a task force.</p><p>The following are broad criteria that we have all come to agree upon within our task force. We are well aware that their adoption may be a pipe dream, but we offer them in the spirit of provoking discussion and perhaps expanding imaginations as to what might be possible.</p><p>(1) Some form of evaluation of anthropology professors seems inevitable. The earlier situations of Japan and China, where seniority was effectively the only grounds for promotion, is broadly untenable.","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"524-535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13981","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}