首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Hematology最新文献

英文 中文
Overall Survival in Male Patients With Advanced Hematological Disease (Mostly Acute Leukemia) Is Influenced by CYP1B1 C432G Polymorphism and Donor Sex in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation 异基因干细胞移植中CYP1B1 C432G多态性和供体性别对晚期男性血液病(主要是急性白血病)患者的总生存率的影响
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27538
Norbert Stute, Michael Koldehoff
<p>Human cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is an extrahepatic key enzyme involved in estrogen metabolism, steroid synthesis, and pro-carcinogen activation. <i>CYP1B1</i> is strongly overexpressed in multiple human malignancies and has been used as a target for cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy. <i>CYP1B1</i> is also overexpressed in acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), disease stage is an established risk factor for overall survival [<span>2</span>]. Our cohort of 118 male patients with advanced disease consisted of advanced forms and stages of AML (<i>n</i> = 47), ALL (<i>n</i> = 17), MDS (<i>n</i> = 12), myeloma (<i>n</i> = 10), CML (<i>n</i> = 9), NHL (<i>n</i> = 8), OMF (<i>n</i> = 6), CLL (<i>n</i> = 6), and CMML (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p>In our recent paper of 382 patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT, we reported a lower overall survival (OS) in male patients with advanced disease (AD) associated with mutant <i>CYP1B1</i> Leu432Val polymorphism (<i>n</i> = 118, <i>p</i> = 0.002): OS 44% ± 8% (CC) vs. 32% ± 6% (CG) vs. 6% ± 6% (GG). Multivariate analysis for OS in male patients with AD revealed <i>CYP1B1</i> polymorphism as the only prognostic factor: RR 1.78, <i>p</i> = 0.001 [<span>1</span>].</p><p>We then tested whether donor sex played a role in the outcome of this subgroup of patients and found a surprising result. In our original study we investigated the outcome of male patients with advanced disease (<i>n</i> = 118) and results were stratified by donor sex: male (<i>n</i> = 93) versus female (<i>n</i> = 25). We did not find a major difference in this subgroup of patients by sex mismatch, see supplementary results [<span>1</span>].</p><p>An interesting and very different picture emerges when recipient <i>CYP1B1</i> polymorphism (R SNP) data is included in the analysis and the results are stratified by donor sex. In the case of male patients with AD and male donors, the estimated 5-year OS was 47% (wildtype, wt) versus 21% (mutant, mut). Median OS was reached after 4.5 versus 1.2 years (Figure 1A), <i>p</i> = 0.002 (log-rank). For female donors the estimated 5-year OS was 30% (wt) versus 47% (mut) and median OS was reached after 0.6 versus 2.2 years (Figure 1B), not significant. While OS is similar in case of sex mismatch, the difference in OS between wt and mut SNP is biggest if the donor is male. Patients with wt SNP have significantly better results regarding OS with a male donor (<i>n</i> = 93), and worse with a female donor (<i>n</i> = 25). In patients with mut SNP both donor sexes perform poorly. The main finding of our recent analysis (mut R SNP does worse in male patients with advanced disease compared to wt R SNP) is especially true if the donor is male and less so when the donor is female (sex mismatch). There was no difference between mut and wt SNP in male patients with early disease irrespective of th
人类细胞色素P450 1B1 (CYP1B1)是一种肝外关键酶,参与雌激素代谢、类固醇合成和致癌原活化。CYP1B1在多种人类恶性肿瘤中强烈过表达,并已被用作癌症化疗和免疫治疗的靶点。CYP1B1在急性淋巴细胞白血病、急性髓性白血病、淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤中也过表达。在同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中,疾病分期是确定的总生存期的危险因素。我们的118名晚期疾病男性患者队列包括晚期形式和分期的AML (n = 47)、ALL (n = 17)、MDS (n = 12)、骨髓瘤(n = 10)、CML (n = 9)、NHL (n = 8)、OMF (n = 6)、CLL (n = 6)和CMML (n = 3)。在我们最近对382例接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的患者的研究中,我们报告了与CYP1B1 Leu432Val多态性突变(n = 118, p = 0.002)相关的晚期疾病(AD)男性患者的总生存率(OS)较低:OS为44%±8% (CC) vs. 32%±6% (CG) vs. 6%±6% (GG)。男性AD患者OS的多因素分析显示CYP1B1多态性是唯一的预后因素:RR为1.78,p = 0.001[1]。然后,我们测试了供体性别是否在这一亚组患者的预后中起作用,并发现了一个令人惊讶的结果。在我们最初的研究中,我们调查了晚期疾病男性患者(n = 118)的结果,并根据供体性别对结果进行了分层:男性(n = 93)和女性(n = 25)。我们在该亚组患者中没有发现性别不匹配的主要差异,见补充结果[1]。当受体CYP1B1多态性(R SNP)数据被纳入分析并按供体性别对结果进行分层时,一个有趣且非常不同的画面出现了。在男性AD患者和男性供体的情况下,估计的5年OS为47%(野生型,wt)和21%(突变型,mut)。中位OS为4.5年vs 1.2年(图1A), p = 0.002 (log-rank)。对于女性供体,估计的5年OS为30% (wt)对47% (mut),中位OS为0.6年对2.2年(图1B),无统计学意义。虽然在性别不匹配的情况下,OS相似,但如果供体是男性,wt和mut SNP之间的OS差异最大。wt SNP患者在男性供体(n = 93)的OS方面有明显更好的结果,而女性供体(n = 25)的OS则更差。在有突变SNP的患者中,供体性别的表现都很差。我们最近分析的主要发现(与wt R SNP相比,mut R SNP在患有晚期疾病的男性患者中表现更差)尤其适用于供体为男性的患者,而当供体为女性时(性别不匹配)则不那么适用。在男性早期疾病患者中,不论供体性别,mut和wt SNP均无差异。受供体性别和CYP1B1多态性影响的男性晚期疾病(AD)患者5年总生存率估计。(A)男性AD患者和男性供者(n = 93):突变受体SNP患者的总生存率低于野生型受体SNP患者(p = 0.002, log-rank)。(B)男性AD患者与女性供者(n = 25)无差异(p = 0.42)。AD:晚期疾病;R SNP:受体SNP,这里CYP1B1 C432G多态性:wt (CC)和mut (CG和GG);SCT:干细胞移植。这同样适用于男性AD患者的非复发死亡率(NRM)和复发,但不适用严重急性移植物抗宿主病(saGvHD)(表1)。wt R SNP中较高的OS与男性AD患者和男性供体中较低的NRM和较低的复发率相关。女性献血者导致mut R SNP患者saGvHD发生率较高(趋势,p = 0.07)。慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGvHD,所有分期)在男性供者中有20/29 (wt)和37/64 (mut),在女性供者中有5/10 (wt)和8/15 (mut)(无统计学意义)。值得注意的是,92%的移植是清髓性的,54%的患者有急性白血病,中位随访时间为76个月。表1。晚期男性患者的R SNP和供体性别分层结果(n = 118)。男性donorFemale donorwt(%)狗(%)佩恩表的编制者(%)狗(%)pOS-5 years47±921±50.00230±1447±13 nsos-median(年)4.5±2.31.2±0.40.0020.6±0.62.2±4.2 nsnrm-1年±327±60.0220±1327±11 nsrelapse-3 years28±842±60.0140±1640±13 day20 nssagvhd - 100±1126±7 ns20±1852±160.07注:数据显示为平均值±标准错误。缩写:CYP1B1 Leu432Val多态性:wt(野生型基因CC), mut(突变基因CG和GG);NRM:非复发死亡率;NS:不显著;OS:总生存期;P: log-rank检验;saGvHD:严重急性移植物抗宿主病。在这项比较受体wt和mut SNP的研究中观察到的性别差异是惊人的。迄今为止,除了女性供体和男性受体急性和慢性GvHD发生率增加外,尚未报道同种异体造血干细胞移植后结果的性别差异[3-6],以及Kim等人。 他还发现,与供体性别无关,男性受体的结果比女性受体差,这本身就对总体存活率有影响。我们还观察到男性患者的5年OS(48%±4%)低于女性患者(58%±4%),p = 0.026 (log-rank, n = 382),在我们的病例中,这主要与男性AD患者的mut R SNP相关(见我们的原始论文[1]中的图1和表4)。女性供体的T细胞对Y染色体上基因编码的次要组织相容性抗原具有特异性,可能导致恶性血液病的GvHD、移植物排斥和移植物抗白血病效应[3,5,6]。有趣的是,CYP1B1突变在男性患者(62%)中比在女性患者(48%)中更常见,p = 0.006,这与供体[1]不同。然而,与受体组(患有血液癌,因此也暴露于抗癌药物和放疗)相比,在供体组中,wt和mut SNP的分布没有性别差异。因此,可以假设,与wt SNP的男性相比,携带mut SNP的男性患血液癌的风险更高,或者在诱导和巩固治疗后更容易复发(因此更容易成为移植候选人)。总之,如果在前瞻性研究或独立队列中得到证实,CYP1B1的这一发现可能会对晚期血液病男性患者的总生存和供体性别的选择产生影响:即在mut SNP患者中,男性供体的“偏好”可以被忽略(与同种异体HSCT的常见做法相反),而在wt SNP患者中,应特别强调选择男性供体。
{"title":"Overall Survival in Male Patients With Advanced Hematological Disease (Mostly Acute Leukemia) Is Influenced by CYP1B1 C432G Polymorphism and Donor Sex in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation","authors":"Norbert Stute, Michael Koldehoff","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27538","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Human cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is an extrahepatic key enzyme involved in estrogen metabolism, steroid synthesis, and pro-carcinogen activation. &lt;i&gt;CYP1B1&lt;/i&gt; is strongly overexpressed in multiple human malignancies and has been used as a target for cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy. &lt;i&gt;CYP1B1&lt;/i&gt; is also overexpressed in acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), disease stage is an established risk factor for overall survival [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Our cohort of 118 male patients with advanced disease consisted of advanced forms and stages of AML (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 47), ALL (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 17), MDS (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 12), myeloma (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 10), CML (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 9), NHL (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 8), OMF (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 6), CLL (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 6), and CMML (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 3).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In our recent paper of 382 patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT, we reported a lower overall survival (OS) in male patients with advanced disease (AD) associated with mutant &lt;i&gt;CYP1B1&lt;/i&gt; Leu432Val polymorphism (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 118, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.002): OS 44% ± 8% (CC) vs. 32% ± 6% (CG) vs. 6% ± 6% (GG). Multivariate analysis for OS in male patients with AD revealed &lt;i&gt;CYP1B1&lt;/i&gt; polymorphism as the only prognostic factor: RR 1.78, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001 [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;We then tested whether donor sex played a role in the outcome of this subgroup of patients and found a surprising result. In our original study we investigated the outcome of male patients with advanced disease (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 118) and results were stratified by donor sex: male (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 93) versus female (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 25). We did not find a major difference in this subgroup of patients by sex mismatch, see supplementary results [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;An interesting and very different picture emerges when recipient &lt;i&gt;CYP1B1&lt;/i&gt; polymorphism (R SNP) data is included in the analysis and the results are stratified by donor sex. In the case of male patients with AD and male donors, the estimated 5-year OS was 47% (wildtype, wt) versus 21% (mutant, mut). Median OS was reached after 4.5 versus 1.2 years (Figure 1A), &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.002 (log-rank). For female donors the estimated 5-year OS was 30% (wt) versus 47% (mut) and median OS was reached after 0.6 versus 2.2 years (Figure 1B), not significant. While OS is similar in case of sex mismatch, the difference in OS between wt and mut SNP is biggest if the donor is male. Patients with wt SNP have significantly better results regarding OS with a male donor (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 93), and worse with a female donor (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 25). In patients with mut SNP both donor sexes perform poorly. The main finding of our recent analysis (mut R SNP does worse in male patients with advanced disease compared to wt R SNP) is especially true if the donor is male and less so when the donor is female (sex mismatch). There was no difference between mut and wt SNP in male patients with early disease irrespective of th","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142760635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methotrexate Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT 异基因造血细胞移植治疗慢性髓系恶性肿瘤的甲氨蝶呤与霉酚酸酯预防疗法:代表 EBMT 慢性恶性肿瘤工作组进行的回顾性分析。
IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27531
Thomas Luft, Luuk Gras, Linda Koster, Nicolaus Kröger, Thomas Schröder, Uwe Platzbecker, Katja Sockel, Régis Peffault de Latour, Matthias Stelljes, Henrik Sengeloev, Matthias Eder, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Peter Dreger, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Johan Maertens, Urpu Salmenniemi, Wolfgang Bethge, Stephan Mielke, Guido Kobbe, Anastasia Pouli, Liesbeth C. de Wreede, Kavita Raj, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Donal P. McLornan, Marie Robin

Prophylaxis strategies for Graft versus host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) frequently encompass a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with either methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The aim of this retrospective, EBMT registry-based study was to determine outcome differences for chronic myeloid malignancies and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) between MTX- and MMF-based prophylaxis regimens while taking potential heterogeneity between subgroups into consideration. Eligible were patients transplanted between 2007 and 2017 who received either MTX- or MMF prophylaxis in combination with a CNI. Endpoints after allo-HCT were overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and Grades 2–4 acute GVHD (aGvHD). Overall, 13 699 patients from 321 centers were included. Median follow-up was 42.8 months (IQR 19.8–74.5 months). MTX prophylaxis was associated with reduced overall mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.95, p = 0.001) and NRM (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.96, p = 0.006) compared with MMF in multivariable Cox regression models in the whole cohort without significant interaction between prophylaxis and subgroups. In contrast, there was no significant association of prophylaxis with risk of relapse (HR 1.03 MTX vs. MMF, 95% CI 0.94–1.14, p = 0.53) or RFS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88–1.01, p = 0.12). There was a reduced risk of Grades 2–4 acute GVHD and reduced mortality after acute GVHD with MTX prophylaxis but no association with outcome in a landmark analysis in patients without aGvHD at 3 months after allo-HCT. In conclusion, MTX-complemented CNI prophylaxis was associated with favorable survival, and with favorable survival after aGVHD compared with MMF.

异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)中移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)的预防策略通常包括将钙神经蛋白抑制剂(CNI)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或霉酚酸酯(MMF)联合使用。这项基于 EBMT 登记处的回顾性研究旨在确定基于 MTX 和 MMF 的预防性治疗方案对慢性髓系恶性肿瘤和继发性急性髓系白血病(sAML)的疗效差异,同时考虑亚组间潜在的异质性。符合条件的患者是在2007年至2017年间接受MTX或MMF预防性治疗并联合CNI的移植患者。allo-HCT后的终点是总生存期、无复发生存期(RFS)、复发率、非复发死亡率(NRM)和2-4级急性GVHD(aGvHD)。总共纳入了来自 321 个中心的 13 699 名患者。中位随访时间为 42.8 个月(IQR 19.8-74.5 个月)。在整个队列的多变量 Cox 回归模型中,与 MMF 相比,MTX 预防可降低总死亡率(HR 0.87,95% CI 0.81-0.95,p = 0.001)和 NRM(HR 0.86,95% CI 0.78-0.96,p = 0.006),预防与亚组之间无显著交互作用。相反,预防性治疗与复发风险(HR 1.03 MTX vs. MMF,95% CI 0.94-1.14,p = 0.53)或 RFS(HR 0.95,95% CI 0.88-1.01,p = 0.12)无明显关联。MTX预防性治疗降低了2-4级急性GVHD的风险,并降低了急性GVHD后的死亡率,但在allo-HCT后3个月无AGVHD患者的标志性分析中,MTX预防性治疗与预后无关。总之,与 MMF 相比,MTX 辅助 CNI 预防与良好的存活率和急性 GVHD 后的存活率相关。
{"title":"Methotrexate Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT","authors":"Thomas Luft,&nbsp;Luuk Gras,&nbsp;Linda Koster,&nbsp;Nicolaus Kröger,&nbsp;Thomas Schröder,&nbsp;Uwe Platzbecker,&nbsp;Katja Sockel,&nbsp;Régis Peffault de Latour,&nbsp;Matthias Stelljes,&nbsp;Henrik Sengeloev,&nbsp;Matthias Eder,&nbsp;Igor Wolfgang Blau,&nbsp;Peter Dreger,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha,&nbsp;Johan Maertens,&nbsp;Urpu Salmenniemi,&nbsp;Wolfgang Bethge,&nbsp;Stephan Mielke,&nbsp;Guido Kobbe,&nbsp;Anastasia Pouli,&nbsp;Liesbeth C. de Wreede,&nbsp;Kavita Raj,&nbsp;Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska,&nbsp;Donal P. McLornan,&nbsp;Marie Robin","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27531","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.27531","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prophylaxis strategies for Graft versus host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) frequently encompass a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with either methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The aim of this retrospective, EBMT registry-based study was to determine outcome differences for chronic myeloid malignancies and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) between MTX- and MMF-based prophylaxis regimens while taking potential heterogeneity between subgroups into consideration. Eligible were patients transplanted between 2007 and 2017 who received either MTX- or MMF prophylaxis in combination with a CNI. Endpoints after allo-HCT were overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and Grades 2–4 acute GVHD (aGvHD). Overall, 13 699 patients from 321 centers were included. Median follow-up was 42.8 months (IQR 19.8–74.5 months). MTX prophylaxis was associated with reduced overall mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and NRM (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.006) compared with MMF in multivariable Cox regression models in the whole cohort without significant interaction between prophylaxis and subgroups. In contrast, there was no significant association of prophylaxis with risk of relapse (HR 1.03 MTX vs. MMF, 95% CI 0.94–1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.53) or RFS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88–1.01, <i>p</i> = 0.12). There was a reduced risk of Grades 2–4 acute GVHD and reduced mortality after acute GVHD with MTX prophylaxis but no association with outcome in a landmark analysis in patients without aGvHD at 3 months after allo-HCT. In conclusion, MTX-complemented CNI prophylaxis was associated with favorable survival, and with favorable survival after aGVHD compared with MMF.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 1","pages":"38-51"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Autologous and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Transformed Waldenström Macroglobulinemia 自体和异体干细胞移植治疗转化型瓦尔登斯特伦巨球蛋白血症
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27543
Eric Durot, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Saurabh Zanwar, Adrienne Kaufman, Shirley D'Sa, Elise Toussaint, Damien Roos-Weil, Miguel Alcoceba, Josephine M. I. Vos, Anne-Sophie Michallet, Dipti Talaulikar, Efstathios Kastritis, Jahanzaib Khwaja, Steven P. Treon, Ramon Garcia-Sanz, Pierre Morel, Javier Munoz, Jorge J. Castillo, Prashant Kapoor, Alain Delmer
<p>Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by a clonal proliferation of plasmacytoid B-cells in the bone marrow and monoclonal IgM gammopathy, that ultimately require treatment in symptomatic patients. Moreover, a small subset of patients undergoes histological transformation (HT) [<span>1</span>], mainly in the form of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). They usually present with high-risk features, such as extranodal involvement, advanced stage, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [<span>2</span>]. Immunochemotherapy (ICT) using anti-CD20 antibodies is commonly used for HT-WM patients, in line with the treatment paradigm for DLBCL. However, the response rates remain low for patients with HT-WM, and the median survival after HT is short (1.5–2.7 years). The role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) as consolidation therapy in HT-WM for fit patients is unknown. Data regarding the use of auto and allo-HSCT in transformed indolent lymphomas is limited to retrospective studies of small patient series with heterogeneous populations in terms of the antecedent histologies (predominantly transformed follicular lymphoma), the timing of HSCT (upfront or salvage), or the conditioning regimen. No dedicated study has specifically examined the outcome of patients with HT-WM who received HSCT.</p><p>In this context, results of a large, retrospective, multicenter, international study investigating the clinical course of patients with HT-WM who underwent autologous (auto-HSCT) or allogeneic (allo-HSCT) transplantation are reported here.</p><p>The database collected, comprising 283 patients with HT-WM, treated between January 1995 and December 2021, was compiled through a retrospective investigation of relevant cases in 20 French centers and 9 from other countries. The study protocol was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.</p><p>Response rates were based on positron emission tomography (PET)-scan, according to the Lugano 2014 classification, as addressed by the treating physician (or computed tomography if a PET-scan was not performed). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), calculated from the date of HSCT until death from any cause or last follow-up (FU). Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of HSCT to relapse, progression, death, or last FU. Other secondary endpoints were the rates of relapse/progression and non-relapse mortality (NRM). PFS and OS probabilities were calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates and compared using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the cohort of patients who received auto-HSCT fitting Cox proportional-hazard regression models for OS and PFS.</p><p>To study the added utility of auto-HSCT after a complete response (CR) to initial ICT, a cohort of 34 patients younger than 70 years, in CR after first-line therapy for HT-WM without HSCT was used. In this comparison, PFS and OS were calculated from the date of HT-
瓦尔登斯特伦巨球蛋白血症(WM)的特征是骨髓中浆细胞性 B 细胞的克隆性增殖和单克隆 IgM 腺病,有症状的患者最终需要接受治疗。此外,一小部分患者会发生组织学转化(HT)[1],主要表现为弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)。他们通常具有高危特征,如结节外受累、晚期和血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高[2]。根据 DLBCL 的治疗模式,使用抗 CD20 抗体的免疫化学疗法(ICT)通常用于 HT-WM 患者。然而,HT-WM 患者的应答率仍然很低,HT 后的中位生存期也很短(1.5-2.7 年)。造血干细胞移植(HSCT)作为HT-WM的巩固治疗对适合患者的作用尚不清楚。有关自体和异体造血干细胞移植用于转化型非淋巴性淋巴瘤的数据,仅限于小规模患者系列的回顾性研究,这些患者在前驱组织学(主要是转化型滤泡性淋巴瘤)、造血干细胞移植时机(前期或挽救期)或调理方案方面存在异质性。在此背景下,我们报告了一项大型、回顾性、多中心、国际性研究的结果,该研究调查了接受自体(auto-HSCT)或异体(allo-HSCT)移植的 HT-WM 患者的临床过程。所收集的数据库包括 283 名 HT-WM 患者,他们在 1995 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受了治疗,该数据库是通过对 20 个法国中心和 9 个其他国家中心的相关病例进行回顾性调查而建立的。研究方案根据《赫尔辛基宣言》制定。响应率根据正电子发射断层扫描(PET)得出,按照2014年卢加诺分类法,由主治医生决定(如果未进行PET扫描,则进行计算机断层扫描)。主要终点是总生存期(OS),从造血干细胞移植之日起计算,直至因任何原因死亡或最后一次随访(FU)。无进展生存期(PFS)从造血干细胞移植之日起计算,直至复发、进展、死亡或最后一次随访。其他次要终点是复发/进展率和非复发死亡率(NRM)。PFS和OS概率采用Kaplan-Meier估计值计算,并采用log-rank检验进行比较。为了研究对初始ICT完全应答(CR)后进行自动造血干细胞移植的附加效用,研究人员使用了34名年龄小于70岁、在接受HT-WM一线治疗后出现CR且未进行造血干细胞移植的患者。表S1总结了未接受造血干细胞移植(n = 227)、接受自体造血干细胞移植(n = 46)和接受异体造血干细胞移植(n = 10)的三组HT-WM患者的特征。转化后的中位 OS(图 S1)分别为 1.3 年(95% 置信区间 [95%CI],1-1.7)、11 年(95% CI,2.6-未达 [NR])和 3.2 年(0.在自体肝移植组中,移植时的中位年龄为 63 岁(31-75 岁),其中一半以上的患者年龄超过 60 岁(63%)。23 名接受检测的患者中有 11 人(48%)在 WM 诊断时检测到 MYD88L265P 突变。4名患者在进展期(PD)接受了造血干细胞移植,14名处于部分反应期(PR);27名(59%)处于CR期。接受异体造血干细胞移植的10名患者(匹配的亲缘供者:6人,不匹配的亲缘供者:1人,匹配的非亲缘供者:2人,未知:1人)的中位年龄为51岁(43-70岁),只有2名患者在移植时年龄超过60岁。3 名接受检测的患者中有 2 人检测到 MYD88L265P 突变。移植时,5 名患者处于 CR 期,3 名处于 PR 期,1 名处于 PD 期(未知:n = 1)。7名患者接受了强度降低的调理方案。自体供体移植后,76%的患者达到了CR(表S1)。自体HSCT后,76%的患者达到了CR(表S1)。自体HSCT前处于PR的14名患者中,共有8名患者;自体HSCT后处于PD的4名患者中,共有1名患者的反应加深至CR(9/18,50%)。存活患者的中位生存期为 5.5 年(95% CI,2.8-7.2 年)。估计3年时(图1)的PFS为44%(95% CI,31%-62%),OS为57%(95% CI,44%-74%),累积复发率(CIR)为54%(95% CI,38%-68%),NRM为2%(95% CI,0.2%-10%)。该队列的规模允许进一步研究预后因素。
{"title":"Autologous and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Transformed Waldenström Macroglobulinemia","authors":"Eric Durot, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Saurabh Zanwar, Adrienne Kaufman, Shirley D'Sa, Elise Toussaint, Damien Roos-Weil, Miguel Alcoceba, Josephine M. I. Vos, Anne-Sophie Michallet, Dipti Talaulikar, Efstathios Kastritis, Jahanzaib Khwaja, Steven P. Treon, Ramon Garcia-Sanz, Pierre Morel, Javier Munoz, Jorge J. Castillo, Prashant Kapoor, Alain Delmer","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27543","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by a clonal proliferation of plasmacytoid B-cells in the bone marrow and monoclonal IgM gammopathy, that ultimately require treatment in symptomatic patients. Moreover, a small subset of patients undergoes histological transformation (HT) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], mainly in the form of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). They usually present with high-risk features, such as extranodal involvement, advanced stage, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Immunochemotherapy (ICT) using anti-CD20 antibodies is commonly used for HT-WM patients, in line with the treatment paradigm for DLBCL. However, the response rates remain low for patients with HT-WM, and the median survival after HT is short (1.5–2.7 years). The role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) as consolidation therapy in HT-WM for fit patients is unknown. Data regarding the use of auto and allo-HSCT in transformed indolent lymphomas is limited to retrospective studies of small patient series with heterogeneous populations in terms of the antecedent histologies (predominantly transformed follicular lymphoma), the timing of HSCT (upfront or salvage), or the conditioning regimen. No dedicated study has specifically examined the outcome of patients with HT-WM who received HSCT.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;In this context, results of a large, retrospective, multicenter, international study investigating the clinical course of patients with HT-WM who underwent autologous (auto-HSCT) or allogeneic (allo-HSCT) transplantation are reported here.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;The database collected, comprising 283 patients with HT-WM, treated between January 1995 and December 2021, was compiled through a retrospective investigation of relevant cases in 20 French centers and 9 from other countries. The study protocol was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Response rates were based on positron emission tomography (PET)-scan, according to the Lugano 2014 classification, as addressed by the treating physician (or computed tomography if a PET-scan was not performed). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), calculated from the date of HSCT until death from any cause or last follow-up (FU). Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of HSCT to relapse, progression, death, or last FU. Other secondary endpoints were the rates of relapse/progression and non-relapse mortality (NRM). PFS and OS probabilities were calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates and compared using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the cohort of patients who received auto-HSCT fitting Cox proportional-hazard regression models for OS and PFS.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;To study the added utility of auto-HSCT after a complete response (CR) to initial ICT, a cohort of 34 patients younger than 70 years, in CR after first-line therapy for HT-WM without HSCT was used. In this comparison, PFS and OS were calculated from the date of HT-","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142713083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage With MDS-Associated Mutations Show Similar Prognosis Compared to Acute Myeloid Leukemia With MDS-Associated Mutations: A Study From the Bone Marrow Pathology Group 与带有 MDS 相关突变的急性髓系白血病相比,带有 MDS 相关突变的模糊系急性白血病显示出相似的预后:骨髓病理学小组的一项研究
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27537
Timothy J. Kirtek, Weina Chen, Jaryse C. Harris, Adam Bagg, Kathryn Foucar, Wayne Tam, Attilio Orazi, Eric D. Hsi, Robert P. Hasserjian, Sa A. Wang, David P. Ng, Tracy I. George, Min Shi, Kaaren K. Reichard, Emily Symes, Xinmin Zhang, Daniel A. Arber, Olga K. Weinberg
<h2>1 Introduction</h2><p>To the Editor: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage (ALAL) comprise a diverse variety of acute leukemias that are defined by their morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. AML is characterized by clonal expansion of immature hematopoietic precursors of myeloid lineage in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. AML may arise de novo, evolve from prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), or after exposure to cytotoxic or radiation therapy, called therapy-related AML [<span>1</span>]. The recent classifications of the World Health Organization (WHO), the 5th Edition Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours, and the International Consensus Classification of Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms (ICC) both allow for classification of AMLs that arose from, or are otherwise related to, MDS as distinct entities, if diagnostic and exclusionary criteria are met [<span>2, 3</span>]. These subcategories include AML, myelodysplasia-related in the WHO and AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations, or AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities in the ICC.</p><p>Both classifications have moved more toward genetically defined classifications of acute leukemias. Both now recognize MDS-associated mutations as defining of MDS-related AML (AML-MR), a disease with poor prognosis. Among the features that define AML-MR are mutations known as secondary-type or MDS-associated mutations, so named because, in the context of AML, they are highly specific for AML arising from preceding MDS, MPNs, or therapy-related clonal aberrations. The presence of mutations in <i>SRSF2</i>, <i>SF3B1</i>, <i>U2AF1</i>, <i>ZRSR2</i>, <i>ASXL1</i>, <i>EZH2</i>, <i>BCOR</i>, or <i>STAG2</i> genes is > 95% specific for these “secondary” AMLs [<span>4</span>]. Somatic mutations in <i>RUNX1</i> are commonly associated with mutations in other genes characterizing AML-MR and are included in this category in the ICC. AML with mutated <i>RUNX1</i> is a provisional entity in the WHO 4th edition.</p><p>ALALs have blast populations that either do not show any clear lineage, acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL), or those that show multi-lineage differentiation, mixed phenotype acute leukemias (MPAL). ALALs are rare, comprising ~4% of acute leukemias, the majority of those being MPAL [<span>3</span>]. However, leukemias that meet the criteria for other defined categories, such as AMLs with defining genetic abnormalities, are excluded from MPAL. Investigations into the genetic basis of ALAL are limited and have shown great heterogeneity in associated genetic mutations, with some associated with ALL, others with AML, and others with neither. Mutations in MDS-associated genes may be present in a significant proportion of ALAL cases with <i>RUNX1</i> mutations among the most common [<span>5</span>].</p><p>The current classifications are unclear on how ALALs should be
1 引言致编辑:急性髓性白血病(AML)和血系不明确的急性白血病(ALAL)是多种多样的急性白血病,它们由形态学、免疫表型和遗传学特征所决定。急性髓细胞性白血病的特征是外周血和骨髓中髓系未成熟造血前体的克隆性扩增。急性髓细胞性白血病可能从头开始出现,也可能由先前的骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)或骨髓增生异常/骨髓增生性肿瘤(MDS/MPN)演变而来,或在接受细胞毒或放射治疗后出现,称为治疗相关性急性髓细胞性白血病[1]。世界卫生组织(WHO)最近的分类--第五版《血淋巴肿瘤分类》(Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours)和《骨髓和淋巴肿瘤国际共识分类》(International Consensus Classification of Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms,ICC)--都允许在符合诊断和排除标准的情况下,将由 MDS 演变而来或与之相关的 AML 划分为不同的实体[2, 3]。这些亚类包括 WHO 的骨髓增生异常相关急性髓细胞性白血病和 ICC 的骨髓增生异常相关基因突变或骨髓增生异常相关细胞遗传学异常急性髓细胞性白血病。目前,这两种分类方法都认为 MDS 相关基因突变是 MDS 相关急性髓细胞性白血病(AML-MR)的特征,这种疾病的预后较差。在定义 AML-MR 的特征中,有一种突变被称为次级型突变或 MDS 相关突变,之所以这样命名,是因为在急性髓细胞性白血病的情况下,这些突变对于由先前的 MDS、MPN 或与治疗相关的克隆畸变引起的急性髓细胞性白血病具有高度特异性。SRSF2、SF3B1、U2AF1、ZRSR2、ASXL1、EZH2、BCOR 或 STAG2 基因突变对这些 "继发性 "急性髓细胞白血病的特异性高达 95%[4]。RUNX1 的体细胞突变通常与其他具有 AML-MR 特征的基因突变相关联,因此在 ICC 中被归入这一类别。RUNX1突变的急性髓细胞性白血病是WHO第四版中的一个暂定实体。ALALs的鼓泡群要么未显示任何明确的系谱,即急性未分化白血病(AUL),要么显示多系分化,即混合表型急性白血病(MPAL)。ALAL很罕见,约占急性白血病的4%,其中大多数是MPAL[3]。然而,MPAL 不包括符合其他定义类别标准的白血病,如具有明确遗传异常的急性髓细胞性白血病。对 ALAL 遗传基础的研究很有限,而且相关基因突变的异质性很大,有些与 ALL 相关,有些与 AML 相关,有些则两者都不相关。MDS相关基因突变可能存在于相当一部分ALAL病例中,其中RUNX1基因突变最为常见[5]。目前的分类方法对存在 MDS 相关基因突变的 ALAL 应如何分类尚不明确。然而,ALAL 的临床和遗传特征,包括那些与 MDS 相关的基因突变,仍然特征不清。我们这项研究的目的是确定MDS相关突变在ALAL中的意义,并与具有MDS相关突变的新发急性髓细胞性白血病病例进行比较。
{"title":"Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage With MDS-Associated Mutations Show Similar Prognosis Compared to Acute Myeloid Leukemia With MDS-Associated Mutations: A Study From the Bone Marrow Pathology Group","authors":"Timothy J. Kirtek, Weina Chen, Jaryse C. Harris, Adam Bagg, Kathryn Foucar, Wayne Tam, Attilio Orazi, Eric D. Hsi, Robert P. Hasserjian, Sa A. Wang, David P. Ng, Tracy I. George, Min Shi, Kaaren K. Reichard, Emily Symes, Xinmin Zhang, Daniel A. Arber, Olga K. Weinberg","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27537","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h2&gt;1 Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;To the Editor: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage (ALAL) comprise a diverse variety of acute leukemias that are defined by their morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. AML is characterized by clonal expansion of immature hematopoietic precursors of myeloid lineage in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. AML may arise de novo, evolve from prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), or after exposure to cytotoxic or radiation therapy, called therapy-related AML [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The recent classifications of the World Health Organization (WHO), the 5th Edition Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours, and the International Consensus Classification of Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms (ICC) both allow for classification of AMLs that arose from, or are otherwise related to, MDS as distinct entities, if diagnostic and exclusionary criteria are met [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. These subcategories include AML, myelodysplasia-related in the WHO and AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations, or AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities in the ICC.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Both classifications have moved more toward genetically defined classifications of acute leukemias. Both now recognize MDS-associated mutations as defining of MDS-related AML (AML-MR), a disease with poor prognosis. Among the features that define AML-MR are mutations known as secondary-type or MDS-associated mutations, so named because, in the context of AML, they are highly specific for AML arising from preceding MDS, MPNs, or therapy-related clonal aberrations. The presence of mutations in &lt;i&gt;SRSF2&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;SF3B1&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;U2AF1&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;ZRSR2&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;ASXL1&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;EZH2&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;BCOR&lt;/i&gt;, or &lt;i&gt;STAG2&lt;/i&gt; genes is &gt; 95% specific for these “secondary” AMLs [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Somatic mutations in &lt;i&gt;RUNX1&lt;/i&gt; are commonly associated with mutations in other genes characterizing AML-MR and are included in this category in the ICC. AML with mutated &lt;i&gt;RUNX1&lt;/i&gt; is a provisional entity in the WHO 4th edition.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;ALALs have blast populations that either do not show any clear lineage, acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL), or those that show multi-lineage differentiation, mixed phenotype acute leukemias (MPAL). ALALs are rare, comprising ~4% of acute leukemias, the majority of those being MPAL [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. However, leukemias that meet the criteria for other defined categories, such as AMLs with defining genetic abnormalities, are excluded from MPAL. Investigations into the genetic basis of ALAL are limited and have shown great heterogeneity in associated genetic mutations, with some associated with ALL, others with AML, and others with neither. Mutations in MDS-associated genes may be present in a significant proportion of ALAL cases with &lt;i&gt;RUNX1&lt;/i&gt; mutations among the most common [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;The current classifications are unclear on how ALALs should be","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"235 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Basophilia Predicts Poorer Outcomes in Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera, Primary Myelofibrosis, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable 嗜碱性粒细胞增多症预示着重要血小板增多症、多发性红细胞瘤、原发性骨髓纤维化和骨髓增生性肿瘤(不可分类)的预后较差
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27530
Lisa Yuen, Tasos Gogakos, Leonardo Boiocchi, Gabriela Hobbs, Robert Hasserjian

Basophils are hematopoietic cells derived from myeloid progenitor cells and are found in increased numbers in some myeloid neoplasms, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Marked basophilia is a poor prognostic indicator in CML and defines accelerated phase according to the revised 4th edition World Health Organization (WHO4R) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC).

Basophilia is less well-documented in the classic BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The clinical behavior of these BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs is heterogeneous, with varying propensity to progress to fibrotic or blast phase. Prior studies have reported that patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF) with high basophil counts have increased risk of progression to blast phase, shortened survival, and more frequent CALR mutations [1].

The significance of basophilia across ET, PV, and PMF, as well as its association with driver mutations other than the classic JAK2 V617F, CALR, and MPL, have not been previously characterized. In the current study, we examined a broad cohort of MPNs to determine associations of basophilia with clinical and molecular features and patient outcome.

嗜碱性粒细胞是源自髓系祖细胞的造血细胞,在一些髓系肿瘤,尤其是慢性髓性白血病(CML)中,嗜碱性粒细胞的数量会增加。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)修订的第四版(WHO4R)分类和国际共识分类(ICC),明显的嗜碱性粒细胞增多是 CML 的不良预后指标,也是加速期的定义。这些BCR::ABL1阴性MPN的临床表现各不相同,进展到纤维化期或坏死期的倾向也各不相同。先前的研究报告称,嗜碱性粒细胞计数高的原发性或继发性骨髓纤维化(MF)患者进展到鼓风期的风险增加,生存期缩短,CALR突变更频繁[1]。嗜碱性粒细胞增多在ET、PV和PMF中的意义,及其与经典的JAK2 V617F、CALR和MPL以外的驱动突变的关联,先前尚未定性。在目前的研究中,我们研究了一大批多发性骨髓瘤患者,以确定嗜碱性粒细胞增多与临床和分子特征及患者预后的关系。
{"title":"Basophilia Predicts Poorer Outcomes in Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera, Primary Myelofibrosis, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable","authors":"Lisa Yuen, Tasos Gogakos, Leonardo Boiocchi, Gabriela Hobbs, Robert Hasserjian","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27530","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Basophils are hematopoietic cells derived from myeloid progenitor cells and are found in increased numbers in some myeloid neoplasms, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Marked basophilia is a poor prognostic indicator in CML and defines accelerated phase according to the revised 4th edition World Health Organization (WHO4R) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC).</p>\u0000<p>Basophilia is less well-documented in the classic <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The clinical behavior of these <i>BCR::ABL1-</i>negative MPNs is heterogeneous, with varying propensity to progress to fibrotic or blast phase. Prior studies have reported that patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF) with high basophil counts have increased risk of progression to blast phase, shortened survival, and more frequent <i>CALR</i> mutations [<span>1</span>].</p>\u0000<p>The significance of basophilia across ET, PV, and PMF, as well as its association with driver mutations other than the classic <i>JAK2</i> V617F, <i>CALR</i>, and <i>MPL</i>, have not been previously characterized. In the current study, we examined a broad cohort of MPNs to determine associations of basophilia with clinical and molecular features and patient outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent in Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Genotype Signatures for Response and Prognosis: A Real-World Study Venetoclax 和低甲基化药物在既往未接受过治疗的高风险骨髓增生异常综合征中的应用以及反应和预后的基因型特征:真实世界研究
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27532
Jing Wang, Zhijian Fang, Siyi Yang, Kexin Yan, Jingjing Zhang, Yanfang Yu, Yaoliang Ren, Hao Jiang, Jinsong Jia, Jianlin Chen, Botao Li, Yingjun Chang, Xiaosu Zhao, Xiaojun Huang
<p>Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), as defined by the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R), requires more aggressive treatment. Despite the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs), response rates remain low, underscoring the need for more effective therapies. Venetoclax is a potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein, which acts synergistically with HMAs to target malignant myeloid cells. The combination of venetoclax and HMAs has been approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [<span>1</span>]. Clinical trials have shown that venetoclax combined with HMAs exhibits efficacy not only in newly diagnosed patients but also in those with relapsed or refractory MDS [<span>2, 3</span>]. However, real-world data on this combination remain limited, particularly in previously untreated high-risk MDS populations, where genotype signatures for response and prognosis are not yet fully elucidated. Our study aims to address this gap by providing real-world evidence on the efficacy, safety, and genotype-based outcomes of venetoclax plus HMA therapy in this patient population.</p><p>This retrospective, real-world study was conducted at Peking University People's Hospital and Beijing Qinghe Hospital, analyzing the data from a cohort of previously untreated patients with higher-risk MDS who were administered venetoclax in combination with a HMA between January 2020 and February 2024. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older, with a morphological diagnosis of MDS as per the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, and were stratified as higher-risk according to the IPSS-R (score > 3.5), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete treatment response data, a diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or therapy-related MDS. Additionally, patients who were eligible for transplantation were typically not considered for venetoclax and HMA treatment at our center, but those scheduled for transplantation more than 2 months later could receive venetoclax and HMAs while waiting for transplantation if marrow blasts were ≥ 5%. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics review committee.</p><p>Baseline data, including demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns, were extracted from medical records. Venetoclax was given at 400 mg daily on Days 1–14 of a 28-day cycle, while decitabine (20 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, d1-5) or azacitidine (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, d1-7) were administered as per standard protocols. Effectiveness outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and event-free survival (EFS), with responses assessed after each treatment cycle according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. EFS was defined as the time to relapse, AML progression, or death, and overall survival (OS) was time to dea
根据修订版国际预后评分系统(IPSS-R)的定义,骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的风险较高,需要更积极的治疗。尽管使用了低甲基化药物(HMAs),但反应率仍然很低,这凸显了对更有效疗法的需求。Venetoclax 是一种口服生物活性强的 B 细胞淋巴瘤 2 (BCL-2) 蛋白抑制剂,可与 HMAs 协同作用,靶向恶性髓系细胞。venetoclax 和 HMAs 已被批准用于治疗新诊断的急性髓性白血病(AML)[1]。临床试验表明,venetoclax 与 HMAs 联用不仅对新诊断患者有效,而且对复发或难治性 MDS 患者也有效 [2,3]。然而,有关这种联合用药的真实世界数据仍然有限,尤其是在既往未接受过治疗的高危 MDS 群体中,这些群体的反应和预后基因型特征尚未完全阐明。这项回顾性真实世界研究在北京大学人民医院和北京清河医院进行,分析了2020年1月至2024年2月期间接受venetoclax联合HMA治疗的既往未经治疗的高危MDS患者队列的数据。符合条件的参与者为年龄在18岁或18岁以上的成人,根据2016年世界卫生组织(WHO)的分类,形态学诊断为MDS,根据IPSS-R(评分&gt; 3.5)被分层为高风险,东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)的表现状态为0-2。如果患者的治疗反应数据不完整、诊断为慢性粒细胞白血病(CMML)或与治疗相关的 MDS,则将其排除在外。此外,符合移植条件的患者通常不考虑在本中心接受 Venetoclax 和 HMA 治疗,但那些计划在 2 个月后接受移植的患者,如果骨髓造血干细胞≥5%,则可在等待移植期间接受 Venetoclax 和 HMA 治疗。从病历中提取基线数据,包括人口统计学、疾病特征和治疗模式。Venetoclax在28天周期的第1-14天每天服用400毫克,同时按照标准方案服用地西他滨(20毫克/平方米,第1-5天)或阿扎胞苷(75毫克/平方米,第1-7天)。疗效结果包括客观反应率(ORR)、完全反应(CR)和无事件生存期(EFS),根据国际工作组(IWG)2006年标准在每个治疗周期后对反应进行评估。EFS定义为复发、急性髓细胞性白血病进展或死亡的时间,总生存期(OS)定义为任何原因死亡的时间。统计分析使用 IBM SPSS 统计 22.0 版进行。ORR和CR采用Clopper-Pearson法计算,生存期分析采用Kaplan-Meier法估算。根据年龄、IPSS-R和基因突变等关键因素进行了亚组分析。采用逻辑回归和 Cox 回归确定影响结局的因素,多变量分析包括单变量分析中 p 值为 &lt; 0.2 的变量。共纳入 103 例既往未接受过venetoclax 和 HMAs 治疗的高危 MDS 患者。中位年龄为61岁(18-77岁)。中位IPSS-R评分为6.0分,50.5%被归类为高风险,35.0%被归类为极高风险。32.2%的患者发现了ASXL1突变,其次是RUNX1(18.9%)、U2AF1(14.4%)和DNMT3A(12.2%)。13.3%的患者存在单倍TP53突变,1.1%的患者存在双倍突变(表S1)。移植患者普遍较年轻,中位年龄为 48 岁,而非移植患者为 63 岁(p &lt; 0.001)。更多移植患者被诊断为中期胚泡期 2(IB2)(83.3% 对 54.8%,p = 0.022)。两个亚组的主要分子特征(包括TP53、RUNX1和NPM1突变)相似(表S2)。103名患者中,97人(94.2%)接受了地西他滨治疗,6人(5.8%)接受了阿扎胞苷治疗,中位治疗周期为4个周期(1-14个周期)。截止到2024年5月27日,59名患者停止了治疗,主要原因是干细胞移植(50.8%)和疾病进展(30.5%)。ORR为79.6%(95%置信区间[CI]:70.5-86.9),CR率为34.0%,骨髓完全应答(mCR)为28.2%。一个治疗周期后,ORR 为 68.9%,CR 为 7.8%,mCR 为 33.0%。 最常见的AE为贫血(98.1%;≥3级:55.3%)、中性粒细胞减少(98.1%;≥3级:53.3%)、血小板减少(97.1%;≥3级:49.5%)和骨髓抑制(86.4%;≥3级:47.6%)(表S5)。1%;≥3级:49.5%)和骨髓抑制(86.4%;≥3级:47.6%)(表S5)。本研究显示,在接受venetoclax和HMAs治疗的高危MDS患者中,RUNX1突变与较差的应答、EFS和OS相关,这与之前的研究结果一致[4]。虽然TP53突变患者的ORR为69.2%,但CR率仅为7.7%,生存期明显缩短,这凸显了venetoclax联合HMAs在该亚组中的获益有限。MDS中ASXL1突变的预后意义仍是一个需要积极研究的领域,不同研究的结果相互矛盾。值得注意的是,之前在MDS人群中进行的文尼他克加HMAs的研究[5, 6]显示,ASXL1突变患者的预后有所改善。然而,患者特征的差异,如MDS中含有过多胚泡或复发/难治性病例的比例较高,以及将Venetoclax加HMA与单用HMA进行比较的特定重点,可能是我们的研究结果与之不一致的原因,在我们的研究中,ASXL1突变与反应或生存无关。虽然移植患者的3年生存率更高(72.2% vs. 49.6%),但这一差异在统计学上并不显著,这可能是由于样本量较小和基线差异造成的,例如移植患者的年龄较小。移植患者的主要死因是非复发死亡,而非移植患者的主要死因是疾病进展。大多数移植相关事件发生在早期,这可能是观察到的生存趋势的原因之一。尽管存在这些局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,对于不符合立即移植条件的患者来说,venetoclax加HMA是一种有效的替代疗法。样本量小、随访时间短,可能会限制其推广性并低估长期结果。总之,venetoclax加HMAs有望治疗未经治疗的高危MDS,其反应率良好,安全性可控。这项研究确定了基因型特征和反应作为生存预测因素,但还需要通过临床试验进一步验证,以加强这些结果。
{"title":"Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent in Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Genotype Signatures for Response and Prognosis: A Real-World Study","authors":"Jing Wang, Zhijian Fang, Siyi Yang, Kexin Yan, Jingjing Zhang, Yanfang Yu, Yaoliang Ren, Hao Jiang, Jinsong Jia, Jianlin Chen, Botao Li, Yingjun Chang, Xiaosu Zhao, Xiaojun Huang","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27532","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), as defined by the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R), requires more aggressive treatment. Despite the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs), response rates remain low, underscoring the need for more effective therapies. Venetoclax is a potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) protein, which acts synergistically with HMAs to target malignant myeloid cells. The combination of venetoclax and HMAs has been approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Clinical trials have shown that venetoclax combined with HMAs exhibits efficacy not only in newly diagnosed patients but also in those with relapsed or refractory MDS [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. However, real-world data on this combination remain limited, particularly in previously untreated high-risk MDS populations, where genotype signatures for response and prognosis are not yet fully elucidated. Our study aims to address this gap by providing real-world evidence on the efficacy, safety, and genotype-based outcomes of venetoclax plus HMA therapy in this patient population.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;This retrospective, real-world study was conducted at Peking University People's Hospital and Beijing Qinghe Hospital, analyzing the data from a cohort of previously untreated patients with higher-risk MDS who were administered venetoclax in combination with a HMA between January 2020 and February 2024. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older, with a morphological diagnosis of MDS as per the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, and were stratified as higher-risk according to the IPSS-R (score &gt; 3.5), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete treatment response data, a diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or therapy-related MDS. Additionally, patients who were eligible for transplantation were typically not considered for venetoclax and HMA treatment at our center, but those scheduled for transplantation more than 2 months later could receive venetoclax and HMAs while waiting for transplantation if marrow blasts were ≥ 5%. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics review committee.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;Baseline data, including demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns, were extracted from medical records. Venetoclax was given at 400 mg daily on Days 1–14 of a 28-day cycle, while decitabine (20 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, d1-5) or azacitidine (75 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, d1-7) were administered as per standard protocols. Effectiveness outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and event-free survival (EFS), with responses assessed after each treatment cycle according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. EFS was defined as the time to relapse, AML progression, or death, and overall survival (OS) was time to dea","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"27 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142684535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of voxelotor on cerebral perfusion and cerebral oxygen metabolism and cardiac stress in adult patients with sickle cell disease Voxelotor 对镰状细胞病成年患者脑灌注、脑氧代谢和心脏压力的影响。
IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27522
Kadère Konté, Liza Afzali-Hashemi, Koen P. A. Baas, Anouk Schrantee, John C. Wood, Erfan Nur, Aart J. Nederveen, Bart J. Biemond

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is complicated by silent cerebral infarcts (SCIs), for which anemia is an important risk factor. Despite normal oxygen delivery (OD), cerebral vascular reserve (CVR), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) are diminished in SCD, possibly causing the formation of SCIs. Voxelotor inhibits polymerization by increasing the hemoglobin oxygen binding, ameliorating hemolytic anemia. Furthermore, anemia is related to cardiac complications. Our aims were to assess the effect of voxelotor on markers of cerebral perfusion, cerebral oxygen metabolism, and markers of cardiac stress in SCD patients. Cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism were measured with MRI before and after 3 months of voxelotor treatment (1500 mg/day) in 18 adults with SCD (HbSS/HbSβ0-thalassemia). Hemoglobin levels significantly increased (p = .001) and markers of hemolysis decreased (p < .05). OD increased from 6.5 (IQR, 6.0–7.1) mL O2/100 g/min to 8.1 (IQR, 7.2–8.7) mL O2/100 g/min (p = .001). CBF and CVR did not change. CMRO2 decreased from 2.0 (IQR, 1.9–2.1) mL O2/100 g/min to 1.9 (IQR, 1.6–2.1) mL O2/100 g/min (p = .03). N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels decreased (p = .048) and maximum tricuspid regurgitation flow velocity (TRVmax) normalized in all but one patient with increased TRVmax. Voxelotor treatment in patients with severe SCD did not decrease CBF despite increased Hb levels. Cerebral oxygen metabolism slightly decreased, despite raised OD, most likely due to drug-induced increase in oxygen binding. Nonetheless, voxelotor improved clinically validated markers of cardiac stress.

镰状细胞病(SCD)与无声脑梗塞(SCI)并发,而贫血是其重要的风险因素。尽管正常的氧输送(OD)、脑血管储备(CVR)和脑氧代谢率(CMRO2)在 SCD 中都会降低,这可能会导致 SCI 的形成。Voxelotor 可通过增加血红蛋白与氧的结合来抑制聚合,从而改善溶血性贫血。此外,贫血还与心脏并发症有关。我们的目的是评估 Voxelotor 对 SCD 患者脑灌注指标、脑氧代谢指标和心脏应激指标的影响。在对 18 名成人 SCD(HbSS/HbSβ0-地中海贫血)患者进行 3 个月的伏塞洛治疗(1500 毫克/天)前后,用核磁共振成像测量了他们的脑血流动力学和氧代谢。血红蛋白水平明显升高(p = .001),溶血指标下降(p 2/100 g/min 降至 8.1(IQR,7.2-8.7)mL O2/100 g/min (p = .001)。CBF 和 CVR 没有变化。CMRO2 从 2.0(IQR,1.9-2.1)毫升 O2/100 克/分钟降至 1.9(IQR,1.6-2.1)毫升 O2/100 克/分钟(p = .03)。N 端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)水平下降(p = .048),除一名 TRVmax 增高的患者外,其他所有患者的最大三尖瓣反流流速(TRVmax)均恢复正常。尽管 Hb 水平升高,但重症 SCD 患者的 Voxelotor 治疗并未降低 CBF。尽管 OD 升高,但脑氧代谢略有下降,这很可能是由于药物引起的氧结合增加所致。尽管如此,Voxelotor 还是改善了经临床验证的心脏应激指标。
{"title":"Effect of voxelotor on cerebral perfusion and cerebral oxygen metabolism and cardiac stress in adult patients with sickle cell disease","authors":"Kadère Konté,&nbsp;Liza Afzali-Hashemi,&nbsp;Koen P. A. Baas,&nbsp;Anouk Schrantee,&nbsp;John C. Wood,&nbsp;Erfan Nur,&nbsp;Aart J. Nederveen,&nbsp;Bart J. Biemond","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27522","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.27522","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is complicated by silent cerebral infarcts (SCIs), for which anemia is an important risk factor. Despite normal oxygen delivery (OD), cerebral vascular reserve (CVR), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO<sub>2</sub>) are diminished in SCD, possibly causing the formation of SCIs. Voxelotor inhibits polymerization by increasing the hemoglobin oxygen binding, ameliorating hemolytic anemia. Furthermore, anemia is related to cardiac complications. Our aims were to assess the effect of voxelotor on markers of cerebral perfusion, cerebral oxygen metabolism, and markers of cardiac stress in SCD patients. Cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism were measured with MRI before and after 3 months of voxelotor treatment (1500 mg/day) in 18 adults with SCD (HbSS/HbSβ<sup>0</sup>-thalassemia). Hemoglobin levels significantly increased (<i>p</i> = .001) and markers of hemolysis decreased (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). OD increased from 6.5 (IQR, 6.0–7.1) mL O<sub>2</sub>/100 g/min to 8.1 (IQR, 7.2–8.7) mL O<sub>2</sub>/100 g/min (<i>p</i> = .001). CBF and CVR did not change. CMRO<sub>2</sub> decreased from 2.0 (IQR, 1.9–2.1) mL O<sub>2</sub>/100 g/min to 1.9 (IQR, 1.6–2.1) mL O<sub>2</sub>/100 g/min (<i>p</i> = .03). N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels decreased (<i>p</i> = .048) and maximum tricuspid regurgitation flow velocity (TRV<sub>max</sub>) normalized in all but one patient with increased TRV<sub>max</sub>. Voxelotor treatment in patients with severe SCD did not decrease CBF despite increased Hb levels. Cerebral oxygen metabolism slightly decreased, despite raised OD, most likely due to drug-induced increase in oxygen binding. Nonetheless, voxelotor improved clinically validated markers of cardiac stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 1","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625979/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142674479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment-Free Remissions in Children With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): A Prospective Study From the Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH) Pediatric CML (pCML) Cohort 慢性髓性白血病(CML)患儿的无治疗缓解率:塔塔纪念医院(TMH)儿科 CML(pCML)队列的前瞻性研究
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27528
Nirmalya Roy Moulik, Swaminathan Keerthivasagam, Gaurav Chatterjee, Jayesh Agiwale, Pallavi Rane, Chetan Dhamne, Akanksha Chichra, Shyam Srinivasan, Purvi Mohanty, Hemani Jain, Dhanlaxmi Shetty, Sweta Rajpal, Prashant Tembhare, Nikhil Patkar, Gaurav Narula, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Shripad Banavali
Pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia (pCML) is a rare childhood malignancy, representing 2%–3% of all childhood leukemia. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved survival but pose challenges due to their long-term effects on growth and bone health in children. We prospectively studied treatment-free remission (TFR) in 45 children with pCML in chronic phase on imatinib. Eligibility criteria were as per current NCCN guidelines, with a less stringent qPCR monitoring scheduled every 3 months. TFR was successful in 71.1% (32 out of 45) of patients after a median follow-up of 25 (range: 6–42) months. The TFR rates at 12 and 24 months were 70% and 66%, respectively. Children under 5 years had a TFR rate of 88.9%, compared to 61.8% in those over 5 years (p = 0.18). Eleven of the 13 patients who lost MMR did so within 6 months of discontinuation. The cumulative incidence of loss in MMR at 6, 12, and 24 months was 26.4%, 27%, and 33%, respectively. Ten out of 13 (76.9%) patients with discontinuation failure (DF) regained MMR within 3 (2–20) months of restarting imatinib. A significant correlation was found between higher T-regulatory cell levels at baseline and DF (p = 0.005). More than half patients showed improved bone mineral density after 2 years of TFR. Our findings suggest that high TFR rates can be attained in pCML, with added benefits for bone health. Less frequent molecular monitoring was not associated with adverse outcomes and there seems to be a role of the immune system in sustaining TFR. The study is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2020/11/029199).
小儿慢性髓性白血病(pCML)是一种罕见的儿童恶性肿瘤,占所有儿童白血病的 2%-3%。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)大大提高了生存率,但由于其对儿童生长和骨骼健康的长期影响,也带来了挑战。我们对 45 名接受伊马替尼治疗的慢性期 pCML 患儿的无治疗缓解率(TFR)进行了前瞻性研究。资格标准符合现行的 NCCN 指南,每 3 个月进行一次不那么严格的 qPCR 监测。中位随访 25 个月(6-42 个月)后,71.1% 的患者(45 人中有 32 人)成功进行了 TFR。12 个月和 24 个月的 TFR 成功率分别为 70% 和 66%。5岁以下儿童的TFR率为88.9%,而5岁以上儿童的TFR率为61.8%(P = 0.18)。在停药后 6 个月内,13 名丧失 MMR 的患者中有 11 人丧失了 MMR。停药 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月后 MMR 下降的累积发生率分别为 26.4%、27% 和 33%。13例停药失败(DF)患者中有10例(76.9%)在重新开始服用伊马替尼后3(2-20)个月内恢复了MMR。基线T调节细胞水平较高与DF之间存在明显相关性(p = 0.005)。超过一半的患者在 TFR 2 年后骨矿物质密度有所改善。我们的研究结果表明,pCML 患者可以达到较高的 TFR 率,从而为骨骼健康带来更多益处。较少的分子监测频率与不良结果无关,而且免疫系统似乎在维持 TFR 方面发挥了作用。该研究已在印度临床试验注册中心注册(CTRI/2020/11/029199)。
{"title":"Treatment-Free Remissions in Children With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): A Prospective Study From the Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH) Pediatric CML (pCML) Cohort","authors":"Nirmalya Roy Moulik, Swaminathan Keerthivasagam, Gaurav Chatterjee, Jayesh Agiwale, Pallavi Rane, Chetan Dhamne, Akanksha Chichra, Shyam Srinivasan, Purvi Mohanty, Hemani Jain, Dhanlaxmi Shetty, Sweta Rajpal, Prashant Tembhare, Nikhil Patkar, Gaurav Narula, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Shripad Banavali","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27528","url":null,"abstract":"Pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia (pCML) is a rare childhood malignancy, representing 2%–3% of all childhood leukemia. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved survival but pose challenges due to their long-term effects on growth and bone health in children. We prospectively studied treatment-free remission (TFR) in 45 children with pCML in chronic phase on imatinib. Eligibility criteria were as per current NCCN guidelines, with a less stringent qPCR monitoring scheduled every 3 months. TFR was successful in 71.1% (32 out of 45) of patients after a median follow-up of 25 (range: 6–42) months. The TFR rates at 12 and 24 months were 70% and 66%, respectively. Children under 5 years had a TFR rate of 88.9%, compared to 61.8% in those over 5 years (<i>p</i> = 0.18). Eleven of the 13 patients who lost MMR did so within 6 months of discontinuation. The cumulative incidence of loss in MMR at 6, 12, and 24 months was 26.4%, 27%, and 33%, respectively. Ten out of 13 (76.9%) patients with discontinuation failure (DF) regained MMR within 3 (2–20) months of restarting imatinib. A significant correlation was found between higher T-regulatory cell levels at baseline and DF (<i>p</i> = 0.005). More than half patients showed improved bone mineral density after 2 years of TFR. Our findings suggest that high TFR rates can be attained in pCML, with added benefits for bone health. Less frequent molecular monitoring was not associated with adverse outcomes and there seems to be a role of the immune system in sustaining TFR. The study is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2020/11/029199).","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142678562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Different impacts of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes for adult acute myeloid leukemia according to graft type 移植类型不同,粒细胞集落刺激因子对成人急性髓性白血病异基因造血细胞移植结果的影响也不同。
IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27521
Takaaki Konuma, Kazuaki Kameda, Kaoru Morita, Tadakazu Kondo, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Fumihiko Ouchi, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Takahiro Fukuda, Yuta Hasegawa, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Makoto Onizuka, Masashi Sawa, Shuichi Ota, Noboru Asada, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Satoshi Yoshihara, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Makoto Yoshimitsu, Yoshinobu Kanda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Masamitsu Yanada

We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5–10), early initiation (Days 0–4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II–IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II–IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.

我们利用日本数据库回顾性评估了 2013 年至 2022 年间 9766 例急性髓性白血病(AML)成人患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)及其时机对移植后预后的影响。我们根据移植类型分别评估了三个不同的队列:3248人接受了骨髓移植(BMT),3066人接受了外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT),3452人接受了单份脐带血移植(CBT)。多变量分析显示,在BMT、PBSCT和CBT后,G-CSF能明显加快中性粒细胞的恢复。然而,在所有移植类型中,G-CSF 与Ⅱ-Ⅳ级急性移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)的较高风险相关。此外,在 BMT 和 CBT 患者中,G-CSF 会增加总体慢性 GVHD 的发生率,而在 PBSCT 患者中则不会。G-CSF的应用仅能明显改善CBT患者的总生存期(OS)和无白血病生存期(LFS)。关于 G-CSF 的使用时机,与晚用(第 5-10 天)相比,无论移植物类型如何,早用(第 0-4 天)对造血功能恢复都没有益处。与此相反,晚期开始使用 G-CSF 与 CBT 患者发生 II-IV 级急性 GVHD 的风险较低以及较好的 OS 和 LFS 显著相关。这些数据表明,在所有移植物类型中,G-CSF 的应用都会加速中性粒细胞的恢复并增加 II-IV 级急性 GVHD 的风险,但却能显著改善生存预后,但仅限于 CBT 患者。因此,应考虑在急性髓细胞性白血病成人患者的 CBT 中常规使用 G-CSF。
{"title":"Different impacts of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes for adult acute myeloid leukemia according to graft type","authors":"Takaaki Konuma,&nbsp;Kazuaki Kameda,&nbsp;Kaoru Morita,&nbsp;Tadakazu Kondo,&nbsp;Fumihiko Kimura,&nbsp;Hideki Nakasone,&nbsp;Fumihiko Ouchi,&nbsp;Naoyuki Uchida,&nbsp;Masatsugu Tanaka,&nbsp;Tetsuya Nishida,&nbsp;Takahiro Fukuda,&nbsp;Yuta Hasegawa,&nbsp;Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto,&nbsp;Makoto Onizuka,&nbsp;Masashi Sawa,&nbsp;Shuichi Ota,&nbsp;Noboru Asada,&nbsp;Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara,&nbsp;Satoshi Yoshihara,&nbsp;Fumihiko Ishimaru,&nbsp;Makoto Yoshimitsu,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Kanda,&nbsp;Marie Ohbiki,&nbsp;Yoshiko Atsuta,&nbsp;Masamitsu Yanada","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27521","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.27521","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5–10), early initiation (Days 0–4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II–IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II–IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 1","pages":"66-77"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625993/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142674913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-line treatment of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia in Italy: A multicenter real-life study on 547 patients to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of different chemoimmunotherapy strategies 意大利瓦尔登斯特伦巨球蛋白血症的一线治疗:一项针对 547 名患者的多中心实际研究,旨在评估不同化学免疫疗法策略的长期疗效和耐受性。
IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27524
Francesco Autore, A. Tedeschi, G. Benevolo, V. Mattiello, E. Galli, N. Danesin, R. Rizzi, J. Olivieri, E. Cencini, B. Puccini, I. Ferrarini, D. Marino, M. Bullo, B. Rossini, M. Motta, I. Innocenti, A. Fresa, L. Stirparo, D. Petrilli, R. Pasquale, P. Musto, G. Scapinello, A. Noto, V. Peri, G. Zamprogna, S. Hohaus, A. M. Frustaci, F. Piazza, S. Ferrero, L. Laurenti
<p>Treatment is indicated in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) when clinical manifestations arise due to the IgM paraprotein or lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The main classes of drugs used for WM treatment include monoclonal antibodies, chemotherapeutic agents, proteasome inhibitors, and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi). The most frequently used chemotherapeutic agent is bendamustine, which is largely administered for its efficacy and relatively favorable toxicity profile with low rates of non-hematological adverse events.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) is considered to be especially useful in fit patients in need of rapid disease control.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Rituximab has been evaluated in combination not only with bendamustine (BR), but also with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide (DRC).<span><sup>4</sup></span> A retrospective comparison between BR and DRC was performed at Mayo Clinic, reporting a significantly greater two-year progression free survival (PFS) for BR (88% vs. 61%, respectively) but without a significant difference in overall response rate (ORR) at 18 months (93% vs. 96%, respectively).<span><sup>4</sup></span> In contrast, both a superior ORR (98% vs. 85%, respectively) and major response rate (96% vs. 60%, respectively) were reported for BR in the study of Abeykoon et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different chemoimmunotherapy regimens used for the treatment of WM patients, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 14 different Italian centers of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). The study group included unselected, consecutive WM patients who received frontline treatment with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen between January 2008 and December 2022. Primary outcome measures included ORR, PFS, and OS, as defined by the International Workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Primary outcomes were also assessed based on the total received bendamustine dose, which was categorized using the percentage of the relative dose intensity (RDI). The RDI was calculated for each patient as the percentage of drug actually administered compared to that estimated at the beginning of treatment. The starting dose was 90 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, administered on days 1 and 2 of each of the six planned cycles.</p><p>The statistical analyses were conducted on four different treatment groups which included BR, DRC, and two other groups that were named “other R-chemo” and “chemo alone.” The “other R-chemo” group included patients treated with a Rituximab-containing regimen other than BR, such as Chl-R (chlorambucil-rituximab), FCR (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab), or R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), whereas the “chemo alone” group included patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents such as chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide as singl
当IgM副蛋白或淋巴浆细胞浸润引起临床表现时,Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(WM)需要治疗用于WM治疗的主要药物类别包括单克隆抗体、化疗药物、蛋白酶体抑制剂和布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)。最常用的化疗药物是苯达莫司汀,主要是因为它的疗效和相对有利的毒性,以及低比率的非血液学不良事件苯达莫司汀加利妥昔单抗(BR)被认为对需要快速疾病控制的健康患者特别有用。3 .利妥昔单抗不仅与苯达莫司汀(BR)联合应用,还与地塞米松和环磷酰胺(DRC)联合应用梅奥诊所对BR和DRC进行了回顾性比较,报告BR的两年无进展生存率(PFS)显着提高(分别为88%和61%),但18个月的总缓解率(ORR)无显着差异(分别为93%和96%)4相比之下,Abeykoon等人的研究报告了BR的高ORR(分别为98%对85%)和主要缓解率(分别为96%对60%)。5为了进一步评估用于治疗WM患者的不同化学免疫治疗方案的有效性和安全性,我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,涉及意大利林福米基金会(FIL)的14个不同意大利中心。该研究组包括未选择的连续WM患者,他们在2008年1月至2022年12月期间接受了化疗免疫治疗方案的一线治疗。主要结局指标包括ORR、PFS和OS,这些指标由Waldenström巨球蛋白血症国际研讨会定义主要结果也根据接受的苯达莫司汀总剂量进行评估,该剂量使用相对剂量强度(RDI)的百分比进行分类。RDI是计算每个患者实际使用的药物与治疗开始时估计的药物的百分比。起始剂量为90mg /m2/天,在六个计划周期的每一个的第1天和第2天给药。对四个不同的治疗组进行统计分析,包括BR、DRC和另外两个被命名为“其他r -化疗”和“单独化疗”的治疗组。“其他r -化疗”组包括接受非BR的含利妥昔单抗方案治疗的患者,如cl -r(氯苯-利妥昔单抗)、FCR(氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺-利妥昔单抗)或R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松),而“单独化疗”组包括使用氯苯或环磷酰胺等化疗药物作为单一药物治疗的患者。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行分析,数值变量采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验或Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA检验进行评估。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法。采用NCSS, LLC, kysville, Utah, USA (ncss.com/software/ncss).We)的NCSS 2020统计软件进行统计分析,共纳入547例WM患者,其中245例接受BR, 116例接受DRC, 86例接受其他r -化疗,52例单独化疗;48例仅因igm相关症状接受利妥昔单抗单药治疗的患者被排除在分析之外。四组分析患者的基线特征见表S1。BR和刚果民主共和国人群在开始治疗时的年龄(分别为68岁和72岁,p = 0.018)、合并症(刚果民主共和国较高的CIRS和更频繁的呼吸系统疾病)方面存在差异,p &lt;001和p =。IPSSWM评分和β 2微球蛋白水平(BR较高,p &lt; .001)。BR组的ORR为93.3%,DRC组为79.2%,其他r -化疗组为75%,单独化疗组为44%(表S2)。BR组与DRC组相比(HR 3.71 (1.88-7.31), p &lt; 001), BR组与其他R-chemo组相比(OR 4.75 (2.34-9.64), p &lt; 001), ORR差异有统计学意义。在分析PFS曲线时,我们注意到BR的4年PFS为80%,其他r -化疗为68%,DRC为60%,单独化疗为25%(图1)。BR和DRC之间的差异显著(p &lt; 0.001),但BR和其他r -化疗之间的差异不显著(p = .143), DRC和其他r -化疗之间的差异不显著(p = .362)。前三个主要治疗组的OS曲线没有差异(BR组的4年OS为86%,DRC组为89%,其他r -化疗组为93%),而单独化疗组的4年OS减少(58%;图1 b)。多因素分析确定年龄75岁(RR 1.83)、贫血伴血红蛋白10 g/dL (RR 1.63)和治疗选择(DRC而非BR;RR 1.86)是影响PFS的重要变量(表S3)。
{"title":"First-line treatment of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia in Italy: A multicenter real-life study on 547 patients to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of different chemoimmunotherapy strategies","authors":"Francesco Autore,&nbsp;A. Tedeschi,&nbsp;G. Benevolo,&nbsp;V. Mattiello,&nbsp;E. Galli,&nbsp;N. Danesin,&nbsp;R. Rizzi,&nbsp;J. Olivieri,&nbsp;E. Cencini,&nbsp;B. Puccini,&nbsp;I. Ferrarini,&nbsp;D. Marino,&nbsp;M. Bullo,&nbsp;B. Rossini,&nbsp;M. Motta,&nbsp;I. Innocenti,&nbsp;A. Fresa,&nbsp;L. Stirparo,&nbsp;D. Petrilli,&nbsp;R. Pasquale,&nbsp;P. Musto,&nbsp;G. Scapinello,&nbsp;A. Noto,&nbsp;V. Peri,&nbsp;G. Zamprogna,&nbsp;S. Hohaus,&nbsp;A. M. Frustaci,&nbsp;F. Piazza,&nbsp;S. Ferrero,&nbsp;L. Laurenti","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27524","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.27524","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Treatment is indicated in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) when clinical manifestations arise due to the IgM paraprotein or lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The main classes of drugs used for WM treatment include monoclonal antibodies, chemotherapeutic agents, proteasome inhibitors, and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi). The most frequently used chemotherapeutic agent is bendamustine, which is largely administered for its efficacy and relatively favorable toxicity profile with low rates of non-hematological adverse events.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) is considered to be especially useful in fit patients in need of rapid disease control.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rituximab has been evaluated in combination not only with bendamustine (BR), but also with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide (DRC).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; A retrospective comparison between BR and DRC was performed at Mayo Clinic, reporting a significantly greater two-year progression free survival (PFS) for BR (88% vs. 61%, respectively) but without a significant difference in overall response rate (ORR) at 18 months (93% vs. 96%, respectively).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In contrast, both a superior ORR (98% vs. 85%, respectively) and major response rate (96% vs. 60%, respectively) were reported for BR in the study of Abeykoon et al.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different chemoimmunotherapy regimens used for the treatment of WM patients, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 14 different Italian centers of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). The study group included unselected, consecutive WM patients who received frontline treatment with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen between January 2008 and December 2022. Primary outcome measures included ORR, PFS, and OS, as defined by the International Workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Primary outcomes were also assessed based on the total received bendamustine dose, which was categorized using the percentage of the relative dose intensity (RDI). The RDI was calculated for each patient as the percentage of drug actually administered compared to that estimated at the beginning of treatment. The starting dose was 90 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;/day, administered on days 1 and 2 of each of the six planned cycles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The statistical analyses were conducted on four different treatment groups which included BR, DRC, and two other groups that were named “other R-chemo” and “chemo alone.” The “other R-chemo” group included patients treated with a Rituximab-containing regimen other than BR, such as Chl-R (chlorambucil-rituximab), FCR (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab), or R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), whereas the “chemo alone” group included patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents such as chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide as singl","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 1","pages":"189-191"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.27524","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Hematology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1