首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Hematology最新文献

英文 中文
Advancing Anemia Detection With Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Training Strategies Using Conjunctival Images 用深度神经网络推进贫血检测:结膜图像训练策略的比较分析
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70143
Parsa Riazi Esfahani, Tri Brian Nguyen, Akshay Reddy, Aidan Yong, Jason Ward, Nathaniel Tak, Victoria Farasat, Kimia Rezaei, Ekjyot Gill, Jayanth Sridhar
<p>Anemia, characterized by decreased hemoglobin concentration and reduced red blood cell count, affects more than one-third of the global population and contributes substantially to illness and death among young children and pregnant women [<span>1</span>]. Conventional laboratory-based screening is resource-intensive and often inaccessible in low-resource settings [<span>2</span>]. Clinical assessment of conjunctival pallor offers a rapid, noninvasive alternative; however, its accuracy varies with observer experience and lighting conditions [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Deep convolutional neural networks can learn useful image features directly from data, improving the detection of subtle signs. Initial image-processing and thresholding methods achieved about 80%–84% accuracy in detecting conjunctival pallor [<span>2, 3</span>]. More recent studies using ensemble learning and CNNs on augmented data reported nearly 90% accuracy and added hemoglobin level prediction in pediatric groups [<span>4-6</span>]. However, previous studies have varied in algorithmic approach and dataset scope: Tamir et al. applied SVM thresholding to the anterior conjunctiva with 78.9% accuracy, Noor et al. compared decision trees, SVM, and KNN reaching up to 82.6% accuracy, Dimauro et al. mapped noninvasive devices, Appiahene CP-AnemiC yielded 80.6% accuracy, Appiahene's smartphone application reached 92.5% accuracy, Asare et al. reported 98.5% accuracy on pediatric conjunctiva, and Sehar et al. evaluated ensembles and CNNs achieving 89.5% accuracy (see Table S1 for the complete list of studies) [<span>2-8</span>]. A systematic review of these studies was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (see Figure S1). The question of whether training on comprehensive full-eye images rather than isolated palpebral views yields better generalization has not been directly addressed.</p><p>We used 218 conjunctival photographs (126 healthy and 92 anemic) from the Eyes-Defy-Anemia dataset, which provides both full-eye photographs and corresponding isolated palpebral images [<span>9</span>]. Images were divided into training (<i>n</i> = 174; 80%), validation (<i>n</i> = 22; 10%), and test (<i>n</i> = 22; 10%) sets by stratified sampling (Figure S2). Labels were based on WHO hemoglobin thresholds (< 12 g/dL for nonpregnant females and < 13 g/dL for males) and incorporated biological sex. Gender, age, and Hb levels were provided, and the anemic labels followed WHO definitions [<span>10-12</span>].</p><p>Images were split using stratified sampling into training (<i>n</i> = 174), validation (<i>n</i> = 22), and test (<i>n</i> = 22) sets, with a fixed random seed (Figure S2). This mitigated the impact of random split variation and allowed consistent evaluation across models. Four AutoML image classification models were trained using Google Vertex AI (single-label, default settings), which performs transfer learning on a modern CNN backbone with automated hyperparameter tuning. We co
以血红蛋白浓度降低和红细胞计数减少为特征的贫血影响到全球三分之一以上的人口,并在很大程度上导致幼儿和孕妇患病和死亡。传统的以实验室为基础的筛查是资源密集型的,在资源匮乏的环境中往往难以获得。结膜苍白的临床评估提供了一种快速、无创的替代方法;然而,它的精度随观测者的经验和光照条件而变化。深度卷积神经网络可以直接从数据中学习有用的图像特征,提高对细微迹象的检测。初始图像处理和阈值化方法检测结膜苍白的准确率约为80%-84%[2,3]。最近在增强数据上使用集成学习和cnn的研究报道,在儿科组中,准确率接近90%,并增加了血红蛋白水平预测[4-6]。然而,以往的研究在算法方法和数据集范围上有所不同:Tamir等人将SVM阈值法应用于前结膜,准确率为78.9%,Noor等人将决策树、SVM和KNN进行比较,准确率达到82.6%,Dimauro等人绘制无创设备图,Appiahene cp -贫血准确率为80.6%,Appiahene的智能手机应用准确率为92.5%,Asare等人报道儿科结膜准确率为98.5%。Sehar等人评估的ensembles和cnn准确率达到89.5%(完整的研究列表见表S1)[2-8]。根据PRISMA指南对这些研究进行了系统回顾(见图S1)。是否训练全面的全眼图像而不是孤立的眼睑视图产生更好的泛化的问题还没有直接解决。我们使用了来自Eyes-Defy-Anemia数据集的218张结膜照片(126张健康照片和92张贫血照片),该数据集提供了全眼照片和相应的孤立眼睑图像[9]。通过分层抽样将图像分为训练集(n = 174, 80%)、验证集(n = 22, 10%)和测试集(n = 22, 10%)(图S2)。标签基于WHO血红蛋白阈值(未怀孕女性为12 g/dL,男性为13 g/dL),并结合了生理性别。提供了性别、年龄和血红蛋白水平,贫血标签遵循世卫组织定义[10-12]。使用分层抽样将图像分成训练集(n = 174)、验证集(n = 22)和测试集(n = 22),并使用固定的随机种子(图S2)。这减轻了随机分裂变化的影响,并允许跨模型进行一致的评估。使用谷歌Vertex AI(单标签,默认设置)训练了四个AutoML图像分类模型,该模型在具有自动超参数调优的现代CNN主干上执行迁移学习。我们控制了数据摄取、标记、增强和求值,但是精确的体系结构是在AutoML中抽象出来的。使用AutoML平台构建了四个单标签分类器。模型1和模型2在图S3和图S4所示的离体眼睑图像上进行训练。模型1对眼睑图像进行检验,模型2对全眼图像进行检验。模型3和模型4是在图S5和图S6所示的全眼照片上训练的。模型3对眼睑视图进行测试,模型4对全眼视图进行测试。应用数据增强(裁剪、旋转、亮度调整和噪声),并使用imagenet预训练的权值初始化所有模型[4,13]。超参数是自动调优的,每个模型的训练时间大约为1.5小时。使用精确召回率曲线下的面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性和Cohen’s κ来评估测试集的性能。采用双样本z检验比较AUC的差异(α = 0.05)。模型在测试集上的性能如表1所示。模型1的AUC为0.765,灵敏度为44%,特异性为67%,κ为0.11。模型2的AUC为0.834,灵敏度为78%,特异性为83%,κ为0.62。模型3的AUC为0.899,灵敏度为100%,特异性为67%,κ为0.28。模型4的AUC为0.865,灵敏度为44%,特异性为100%,κ为0.44。模型3和模型1:ΔAUC = 0.134, Z = 2.205, p = 0.0275,Δκ= 0.17。模型2和模型4:ΔAUC =−0.031,Z = 6.63, p & lt; 0.0001,Δκ= 0.62。临床医生对结膜苍白的评估是一种贫血筛查工具,但他们的评估取决于他们的经验水平和可用的照明条件[10]。眼科领域的第一个深度学习研究集中在多视网膜疾病识别和糖尿病视网膜病变筛查上,这使得专家们认识到cnn是可以匹配专家级图像分类性能的模型,从而启发了我们对最佳训练方法的研究[4,5]。在全眼图像上训练的模型可以检测到更广泛的解剖细节,这在分析眼睑图像时产生了更好的结果。AUC值达到0。 当模型3从局部血管线索和周围眼部解剖结构中学习时,尽管没有训练暴露于裁剪视图,但它在眼睑测试中的灵敏度为899%和100%。模型1只接受了裁剪后的眼睑图像的训练和测试,但在无法学习超出其有限视野的情况下,其灵敏度为44%,Cohen’s κ为0.11。模型2在对眼睑图像进行训练和对全眼照片进行测试后获得了0.62的κ,这表明交叉视角评估受益于额外的上下文。模型4获得了完美的特异性(100%),但灵敏度较低(44%),我们将其归因于几个因素。首先,非诊断性上下文优势可能有贡献:全眼图像包括巩膜、皮肤、眼睑和角膜,这可能导致模型过度拟合光照、肤色或凝视方向。其次,当调整大小压缩眼睑区域时,信号会发生稀释,削弱关键色线索。第三,由于姿势和曝光的差异,类内视角与全眼视角的差异更大,这增加了噪音。最后,AutoML选择的默认阈值优先考虑整体准确性,以牺牲灵敏度为代价支持特异性。结果表明,具有广泛图像视角的训练模型在特定任务中具有更好的诊断性能。我们的模型输出跟踪贫血严重程度的连续概率评分。由于眼睑苍白随着血红蛋白的下降而加剧,对中度至重度贫血的敏感性有所提高,特别是在回忆优化阈值下。轻度病例的视觉特征与健康眼睛重叠更多,更有可能被遗漏,这与临床苍白分级的已知挑战相一致。由于数据集大小和AutoML约束,缺少k-fold交叉验证是一个限制。然而,我们通过使用带有固定种子的分层分裂来解决这个问题,从而确保测试集的隔离。使用替代种子的敏感性分析保留了模型排名和性能趋势(见局限性)。未来的迭代将在自定义管道中实现完整的交叉验证。图1展示了上传用于诊断预测的图像时的当前用户界面和模型功能的显示。未来的研究必须创建包含多个解剖视图的训练数据集,包括全脸、眼睑和结膜区域,以建立具有可转移特征表示的模型。对网络实施课程学习方法,连续学习复杂的上下文层次,可以增强网络对专门任务的检测能力。研究应继续评估训练过程中全眼与眼睑图像的不同比例对模型灵敏度阈值和假阳性率的影响,以便对各种临床情况进行分类器置信度调整。整合元数据,如年龄、肤色和先前的血红蛋白测量值,将使模型适应患者特定的风险概况,从而从当前的二元筛选工具中开发决策支持系统。性能增强的机理分析要求研究人员了解模型是否使用巩膜对比模式、血管分支结构或泪膜反射。标准化的红外或偏振光全光谱成像可以提高特征对比度和模型精度。高分辨率成像技术和眼睑组织的生物力学建模之间的合作可以发现新的生物标志物,扩大无创贫血检测的可能性。建立多样化的数据集仍然至关重要:必须创建多机构和跨大陆的图像库,以评估模型对相机硬件变化、环境照明和患者人口统计学差异的抵抗力。血红蛋白随时间变化的前瞻性队列研究将验证DNN预测,以开发动态贫血进展和治疗反应监测能力。我们的方法促进了广义的训练基础,支持从数据集孤岛到强调不同背景的综合成像策略的过渡。这种方法显示出了从贫血筛查到其他护理点诊断的应用潜力,因为它允许模型检测病变,
{"title":"Advancing Anemia Detection With Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Training Strategies Using Conjunctival Images","authors":"Parsa Riazi Esfahani,&nbsp;Tri Brian Nguyen,&nbsp;Akshay Reddy,&nbsp;Aidan Yong,&nbsp;Jason Ward,&nbsp;Nathaniel Tak,&nbsp;Victoria Farasat,&nbsp;Kimia Rezaei,&nbsp;Ekjyot Gill,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70143","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70143","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Anemia, characterized by decreased hemoglobin concentration and reduced red blood cell count, affects more than one-third of the global population and contributes substantially to illness and death among young children and pregnant women [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Conventional laboratory-based screening is resource-intensive and often inaccessible in low-resource settings [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Clinical assessment of conjunctival pallor offers a rapid, noninvasive alternative; however, its accuracy varies with observer experience and lighting conditions [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Deep convolutional neural networks can learn useful image features directly from data, improving the detection of subtle signs. Initial image-processing and thresholding methods achieved about 80%–84% accuracy in detecting conjunctival pallor [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. More recent studies using ensemble learning and CNNs on augmented data reported nearly 90% accuracy and added hemoglobin level prediction in pediatric groups [&lt;span&gt;4-6&lt;/span&gt;]. However, previous studies have varied in algorithmic approach and dataset scope: Tamir et al. applied SVM thresholding to the anterior conjunctiva with 78.9% accuracy, Noor et al. compared decision trees, SVM, and KNN reaching up to 82.6% accuracy, Dimauro et al. mapped noninvasive devices, Appiahene CP-AnemiC yielded 80.6% accuracy, Appiahene's smartphone application reached 92.5% accuracy, Asare et al. reported 98.5% accuracy on pediatric conjunctiva, and Sehar et al. evaluated ensembles and CNNs achieving 89.5% accuracy (see Table S1 for the complete list of studies) [&lt;span&gt;2-8&lt;/span&gt;]. A systematic review of these studies was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (see Figure S1). The question of whether training on comprehensive full-eye images rather than isolated palpebral views yields better generalization has not been directly addressed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We used 218 conjunctival photographs (126 healthy and 92 anemic) from the Eyes-Defy-Anemia dataset, which provides both full-eye photographs and corresponding isolated palpebral images [&lt;span&gt;9&lt;/span&gt;]. Images were divided into training (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 174; 80%), validation (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22; 10%), and test (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22; 10%) sets by stratified sampling (Figure S2). Labels were based on WHO hemoglobin thresholds (&lt; 12 g/dL for nonpregnant females and &lt; 13 g/dL for males) and incorporated biological sex. Gender, age, and Hb levels were provided, and the anemic labels followed WHO definitions [&lt;span&gt;10-12&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Images were split using stratified sampling into training (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 174), validation (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22), and test (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22) sets, with a fixed random seed (Figure S2). This mitigated the impact of random split variation and allowed consistent evaluation across models. Four AutoML image classification models were trained using Google Vertex AI (single-label, default settings), which performs transfer learning on a modern CNN backbone with automated hyperparameter tuning. We co","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"361-364"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145567091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Daratumumab in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Rapid Platelet Recovery, Sustained Response, and Immune Reconstitution Dynamics 达拉单抗治疗儿童慢性难治性原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP):快速血小板恢复,持续反应和免疫重建动力学
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70148
Yu Hu, Hui Chen, Zhifa Wang, Jingyao Ma, Shuyue Dong, Xi Lin, Xiaoling Cheng, James B. Bussel, Zhenping Chen, Runhui Wu
<p>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), an acquired autoimmune thrombocytopenic disorder, results from increased platelet destruction by the mononuclear phagocyte system and inadequate platelet production [<span>1</span>]. Patients not responding to first-line treatments (intravenous immunoglobulin, IVIG and steroids), or second-line rescue therapies (immunosuppressive agents, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), or splenectomy), and requiring long-term treatment, have refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia (RITP) [<span>2</span>]. Chronic RITP (CRITP) is associated with significant worsening of QoL and difficult clinical management, which can lead to life-threatening bleeding with high morbidity and mortality [<span>3</span>]. There remains a need for novel therapeutics in CRITP beyond TPO-RA. Daratumumab (Dara), a humanized anti-CD38 antibody widely used for treating multiple myeloma [<span>4</span>], has a favorable safety profile and is a promising candidate for treating antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, including ITP [<span>5-7</span>].</p><p>We report 11 CRITP patients treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Dara) from April 2023 to August 2024. Patients were eligible if aged 1–18 years and diagnosed with ITP according to the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines [<span>8</span>]. Additional key eligibility criteria were: (1) mean platelet count on two separate occasions at least 7 days apart less than 30 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; (2) patients had failed to respond to both Rituximab and a TPO-RA; (3) minimum interval of ≥ 6 months since last Rituximab.</p><p>Dara was initiated at 16 mg/kg weekly for 2–8 cycles, with treatment duration determined through shared decision-making between clinicians and patients' parents based on therapeutic response monitoring and availability of treatment. Retreatment was considered in responders who relapsed when patients developed two consecutive weekly platelet counts below 30 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, occurring at least 4 weeks after initial response to Dara. Prophylaxis against hypersensitivity reactions included concomitant administration of methylprednisolone (1–2 mg/kg IV) prior to each infusion. To mitigate secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, all patients received low-dose IVIG 200 mg/kg monthly for six cycles. Patients receiving TPO-RAs had to maintain fixed doses during the final 4 weeks preceding Dara initiation.</p><p>Primary outcome measures were initial response (IR) and sustained response (SR). Secondary outcomes included number of Dara doses, platelet count changes, bleeding scores and adverse events. The bleeding assessment was conducted using the 2019 ICR bleeding score [<span>8</span>].</p><p>Eleven pediatric patients received 2–8 weeks of weekly Dara. At baseline, they exhibited a median disease duration of 36 months (range: 13–121), a median platelet count of 4 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L (range: 2–9), and a median bleeding score of 2 (range: 1–3). All patients had failed first-line and seco
监测前7例患者NK细胞、CD3+ T细胞和CD19+ B细胞的百分比和绝对值。复发患者的NK、CD3和CD19细胞水平较高(表S2)。最后4例患者(# 8-11)进行了更密切的监测。起初,Dara治疗降低了NK和NKT细胞的高比例,而单核细胞和总淋巴细胞没有变化。在这4例患者中,CD19+B细胞的百分比下降;反过来,CD3+ T细胞的百分比增加。(图S3)。快速反应的患者在基线时表现出更高比例的naïve B细胞,而反应较慢的患者表达更高水平的记忆B细胞。此外,与维持SR的患者相比,经历复发的患者在dara后显示出更高的记忆B细胞百分比。浆母细胞和移行性B细胞在第一次服用Dara后立即大幅下降,并且在整个治疗过程中都检测不到(图S4)。Dara表现出良好的耐受性,没有因不良事件而中断治疗(ae,表S3)。在初始给药期间,81.8%(9/11)的患者发生了输注相关反应(IRRs),所有患者均为1-2级,并通过标准化的预用药成功管理。在长期监测期间(中位288天,范围196-430),11名儿童中只有1名发生继发性低γ球蛋白血症。Dara是一种抗cd38单克隆抗体,可消耗自身免疫性疾病患者外周血单个核细胞中的浆细胞和浆母细胞。Dara通过几种机制对表达CD38的细胞(如浆细胞)发挥其毒性活性:补体依赖性细胞毒性、抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)和抗体依赖性细胞吞噬。消耗或减少长寿命浆细胞成功治疗难治性ITP在成人(CM313) b[5]和现在的儿童。所有11例患者均未能接受指南推荐的ITP一线和二线治疗,表明该病高度难治性。对Dara产生首次反应的中位时间非常短,为2天,除2例患者外,所有患者都观察到非常快的反应,与成人[9]的研究和我们之前对3例儿童[9]的研究一致。除了甲基强的松龙预用药外,初始Dara输注后的快速反应可能模仿抗体包被浆细胞“堵塞”FcR系统的抗d活性。11个孩子中的10个和6/11个孩子分别在3个月和6个月时保持了反应。维持缓解率与先前的一项成人抗cd38单克隆抗体[5]治疗的研究基本一致。这表明,在某些情况下,Dara可以导致持续的反应,而其他病例可能至少暂时被Dara再治疗所挽救。特别是,CD38单克隆抗体皮下制剂的可用性使得给药更加方便。ITP治疗的临床益处不仅体现在血小板反应上,还体现在出血减少上。在我们的研究中,Dara耐受性良好,大多数ae是轻微的,与血液系统恶性肿瘤相比,它在ITP中具有更好的安全性[10,11]。所有与注射相关的不良反应都发生在第一次治疗期间,并在注射前后使用糖皮质激素进行管理。对4例患者治疗前后的免疫细胞进行了评估。NK和NK- t细胞在基线时表达高水平的CD38,在Dara治疗后表达水平降低。我们的发现与研究[10]一致,即NK细胞可能在通过ADCC介导的Dara治疗后观察到的儿科患者的快速反应中起关键作用。此外,与维持SR的患者相比,复发的患者在Dara后具有更高的记忆B细胞百分比,与血小板计数呈负相关。记忆B细胞的水平可能是一种生物标志物,表明对Dara治疗的敏感性或耐药性。局限性包括这是一项回顾性研究,样本量相对较小。Dara注射的次数不能预先确定,它取决于可用性,而不是取决于医疗决定。儿童和成人所需和/或最佳输液次数的确切数量仍不确定。尽管如此,这项探索性研究为Dara治疗CRITP儿童提供了初步的重要见解,并为未来的研究提供了有价值的视角。综上所述,抗cd38靶向治疗可快速增加、维持和维持儿科CRITP患者的血小板,且毒性较低。其主要作用是抑制抗体依赖细胞介导的血小板细胞毒性,还是消耗产生自身抗体的长寿命浆细胞,或者其他尚未得到很好描述的作用,还需要进一步研究。胡宇、陈辉和王志发对手稿的撰写贡献相同。 胡宇和马敬尧提供临床护理。陈辉和王志发对数据采集有贡献。董淑悦、程晓玲和林曦对数据分析做出了贡献。James B. Bussel、陈振平和吴润辉构思和设计了这项研究,并审查了手稿。所有作者都认可了这份手稿。国家自然科学基金项目(No. 81970111)、北京市自然科学基金项目(No. 7232051)资助。这项研究是根据《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行的。经首都医科大学伦理委员会批准。患者(或16岁以下儿童的父母或法定监护人)签署了关于公布其数据的知情同意书。作者声明无利益冲突。本研究数据可向作者索取。支持本研究结果的数据可应合理要求从通讯作者吴瑞辉处获得。
{"title":"Daratumumab in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Rapid Platelet Recovery, Sustained Response, and Immune Reconstitution Dynamics","authors":"Yu Hu,&nbsp;Hui Chen,&nbsp;Zhifa Wang,&nbsp;Jingyao Ma,&nbsp;Shuyue Dong,&nbsp;Xi Lin,&nbsp;Xiaoling Cheng,&nbsp;James B. Bussel,&nbsp;Zhenping Chen,&nbsp;Runhui Wu","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70148","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70148","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), an acquired autoimmune thrombocytopenic disorder, results from increased platelet destruction by the mononuclear phagocyte system and inadequate platelet production [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Patients not responding to first-line treatments (intravenous immunoglobulin, IVIG and steroids), or second-line rescue therapies (immunosuppressive agents, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), or splenectomy), and requiring long-term treatment, have refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia (RITP) [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Chronic RITP (CRITP) is associated with significant worsening of QoL and difficult clinical management, which can lead to life-threatening bleeding with high morbidity and mortality [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. There remains a need for novel therapeutics in CRITP beyond TPO-RA. Daratumumab (Dara), a humanized anti-CD38 antibody widely used for treating multiple myeloma [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;], has a favorable safety profile and is a promising candidate for treating antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, including ITP [&lt;span&gt;5-7&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We report 11 CRITP patients treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Dara) from April 2023 to August 2024. Patients were eligible if aged 1–18 years and diagnosed with ITP according to the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;]. Additional key eligibility criteria were: (1) mean platelet count on two separate occasions at least 7 days apart less than 30 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L; (2) patients had failed to respond to both Rituximab and a TPO-RA; (3) minimum interval of ≥ 6 months since last Rituximab.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dara was initiated at 16 mg/kg weekly for 2–8 cycles, with treatment duration determined through shared decision-making between clinicians and patients' parents based on therapeutic response monitoring and availability of treatment. Retreatment was considered in responders who relapsed when patients developed two consecutive weekly platelet counts below 30 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L, occurring at least 4 weeks after initial response to Dara. Prophylaxis against hypersensitivity reactions included concomitant administration of methylprednisolone (1–2 mg/kg IV) prior to each infusion. To mitigate secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, all patients received low-dose IVIG 200 mg/kg monthly for six cycles. Patients receiving TPO-RAs had to maintain fixed doses during the final 4 weeks preceding Dara initiation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Primary outcome measures were initial response (IR) and sustained response (SR). Secondary outcomes included number of Dara doses, platelet count changes, bleeding scores and adverse events. The bleeding assessment was conducted using the 2019 ICR bleeding score [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eleven pediatric patients received 2–8 weeks of weekly Dara. At baseline, they exhibited a median disease duration of 36 months (range: 13–121), a median platelet count of 4 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L (range: 2–9), and a median bleeding score of 2 (range: 1–3). All patients had failed first-line and seco","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"384-387"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70148","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145567089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Polygenic Variation Underlying Neutrophil Counts Modifies the Penetrance of Duffy-Null Neutropenia 中性粒细胞计数的多基因变异改变了Duffy-Null中性粒细胞减少症的外显率。
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70144
John P. Shelley, Mingjian Shi, Lisa Bastarache, Cecilia P. Chung, Jonathan D. Mosley
<p>The Duffy-null phenotype is caused by a genotype that is common among individuals of African ancestry and leads to benign reductions in absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) [<span>1</span>]. Because clinical reference ranges are typically not calibrated to the normal ANC distribution observed in those with the Duffy-null genotype, individuals with this genotype are more likely to fall below the reference range in the absence of disease with a 4- to 14-fold increased risk of neutropenia (ANC < 1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL) [<span>2-4</span>]. This misalignment predisposes these individuals to undergo unnecessary diagnostic procedures or experience treatment modifications due to provider concerns about a lower ANC [<span>5</span>]. This has prompted efforts to construct clinical reference intervals for ANC for those with the Duffy-null genotype [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Even among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype, ANC levels vary widely, and 83%–95% do not meet criteria for neutropenia in cross-sectional studies [<span>2</span>]. Recent studies have demonstrated that polygenic scores—quantitative measures of an individual's burden of common genetic variants associated with a trait—can capture benign variation in white blood cell (WBC) counts and thus, measure a person's polygenic predisposition to benign leukopenia [<span>6</span>]. We have shown that patients with an increased polygenic predisposition to leukopenia are more likely to undergo the same diagnostic escalations that have been associated with Duffy-null associated neutropenia [<span>6</span>]. However, it remains unclear whether polygenic variation underlying ANC modifies the penetrance of neutropenia among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype, or whether such scores can enable more precise reference intervals for ANC. In this study, we evaluated whether a polygenic predisposition to lower ANC modifies the risk of neutropenia and influences reference intervals among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype. By leveraging a large cohort of African ancestry individuals with whole genome sequencing and longitudinal clinical data, we aimed to quantify the contribution of polygenic background to ANC variation and assess its potential utility in refining diagnostic thresholds. Our findings have implications for improving the precision of hematologic care and reducing disparities in clinical decision-making.</p><p>Among 2498 adults of African ancestry (65% female, median age 44 years), 1581 (63.2%) participants carried the Duffy-null genotype (Table 1, Figure S1). At baseline, 126 (8.0%) of Duffy-null participants had neutropenia (ANC < 1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL), compared to 1 (0.1%) participant without the genotype. To characterize other genetic causes of benign ANC variation, we tested the association between a polygenic score for ANC (PGS<sub>ANC</sub>) and clinical outcomes in Duffy-null individuals. For each standard deviation increase in PGS<sub>ANC</sub>, ANC increased by a mod
Duffy-null表型是由一种基因型引起的,这种基因型在非洲血统的个体中很常见,并导致绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)的良性减少。由于临床参考范围通常不符合Duffy-null基因型患者的正常ANC分布,因此在没有疾病的情况下,具有该基因型的个体更有可能低于参考范围,中性粒细胞减少的风险增加4- 14倍(ANC &lt; 1.5 × 103/μL)[2-4]。由于医生担心较低的ANC bbb,这种错位使这些人容易接受不必要的诊断程序或经历治疗修改。这促使人们努力为Duffy-null基因型[3]患者构建ANC的临床参考区间。即使在Duffy-null基因型的个体中,ANC水平差异很大,在横断面研究中,83%-95%的人不符合中性粒细胞减少症的标准。最近的研究表明,多基因评分——个体与性状相关的常见遗传变异负担的定量测量——可以捕获白细胞(WBC)计数的良性变异,从而测量一个人患良性白细胞减少症的多基因易感性。我们已经表明,白细胞减少的多基因易感性增加的患者更有可能经历与Duffy-null相关中性粒细胞减少症相关的相同诊断升级。然而,目前尚不清楚ANC的多基因变异是否会改变Duffy-null基因型个体中中性粒细胞减少症的外显率,或者这些评分是否可以为ANC提供更精确的参考区间。在这项研究中,我们评估了低ANC的多基因易感性是否会改变中性粒细胞减少症的风险,并影响Duffy-null基因型个体的参考区间。通过利用全基因组测序和纵向临床数据,我们旨在量化多基因背景对ANC变异的贡献,并评估其在改进诊断阈值方面的潜在效用。我们的研究结果对提高血液学护理的准确性和减少临床决策的差异具有指导意义。在2498名非洲裔成年人(65%为女性,中位年龄44岁)中,1581名(63.2%)参与者携带Duffy-null基因型(表1,图S1)。在基线时,126名(8.0%)Duffy-null参与者患有中性粒细胞减少症(ANC &lt; 1.5 × 103/μL),而没有基因型的参与者只有1名(0.1%)。为了描述良性ANC变异的其他遗传原因,我们在Duffy-null个体中测试了ANC多基因评分(PGSANC)与临床结果之间的关系。PGSANC每增加一个标准差,ANC适度增加0.12 × 103/μL (95% CI: 0.06-0.19, p = 3.0 × 10−4)(图S2)。然而,较低的PGSANC与普遍中性粒细胞减少的风险增加26%相关(PGSANC每SD降低的优势比为0.74 [0.55-0.93];p = 0.002)。在1581名Duffy-null基因型的参与者中,1035名(65.4%)在首次就诊后的5年内重复了ANC测量。在这个纵向队列中(n = 1035),在随访期间有217例中性粒细胞减少事件,其中88例(40.5%)发生在基线时也有中性粒细胞减少的个体中(表S1)。发生中性粒细胞减少的风险显著受到多基因背景的影响,PGSANC每降低SD,发生中性粒细胞减少的风险增加23%(风险比0.77 [0.60-0.94];p = 0.002)(图1A)。通过PGSANC对Duffy-null个体进行分层显示,基线时ANC的较低参考限值(2.5%)因多基因风险而异。其中,低、中、高PGSANC组的限值分别为0.99(0.91-1.06)、1.15(1.06-1.22)、1.37 (1.24-1.55)× 103/μL(图1B)。值得注意的是,平均PGSANC的下限(1.15 × 103/μL)与先前Duffy null个体的研究预测的下限(1.21 × 103/μL[3])相似。多基因评分较低的个体(即嗜中性粒细胞减少倾向较强的个体)的参考阈值低于目前中度嗜中性粒细胞减少的临界值(1.0 × 103/μL)。在这个成人队列中,我们发现Duffy-null基因型之外的常见遗传变异会导致ANC的变异,并改变Duffy-null相关中性粒细胞减少症的风险。本研究扩展了越来越多的文献,证明白细胞特征,特别是中性粒细胞计数具有实质性的遗传性[6,7]。虽然Duffy-null基因型仍然是ANC降低的主要决定因素,但ANC的波动和中性粒细胞减少症的外显率进一步受到多基因背景的影响。 重要的是,我们使用与中性粒细胞计数相关的遗传变异而不是中性粒细胞减少相关疾病来获得多基因评分,确保我们的评分捕获良性遗传影响而不是病理影响。这加强了我们研究结果的临床相关性,因为它使我们能够分离出遗传的、非疾病相关的变异对ANC水平的贡献。此外,我们数据集的纵向特性使我们能够观察到ANC随时间的波动,揭示了许多具有Duffy-null基因型的个体间歇性地交叉诊断阈值。鉴于中性粒细胞减少症诊断的已知后果——包括不必要的临床干预,如骨髓活检或过早停止化疗——这些结果强调了以遗传知情的方式改进ANC阈值的必要性[5,8,9]。概念和方法:J.P.S., M.S., J.D.M.数据管理:J.P.S., J.D.M., M.S.形式分析:J.P.S., M.S.软件:J.P.S., J.D.M., M.S.监督:J.D.M.写作-原稿:J.P.S.写作-审查和编辑:J.P.S., M.S., C.P.C., l.b.s., J.D.M.这项工作得到了美国国立卫生研究院的支持:r01g011791 (J.D.M.), U01HG011181 (J.D.M.), U01HG013771 (J.D.M.), U01HG011166 (J.D.M.), R01GM126535 (C.P.C.)和T32GM007347 (J.P.S.)。范德比尔特大学医学中心的BioVU项目得到了许多来源的支持:机构资金、私人机构和联邦拨款。这些包括NIH资助的共享仪器补助金S10OD017985, S10RR025141和S10OD025092;CTSA批准UL1TR002243、UL1TR000445和UL1RR024975。基因组数据也由研究者主导的项目支持,包括U01HG004798、R01NS032830、RC2GM092618、P50GM115305、U01HG006378、U19HL065962、R01HD074711;以及以下额外资金来源:K07CA172294、14GRNT20460090、P01DK038226、R24DK96527、R01LM010685、R01EY012118、K12HD043483、R01DK078616、RC2GM092618、APP1064524、R01CA162433、P01HL056693、P50GM115305、U01HG006378、U19HL065962、U01HG004603、P50CA09813、R01HD074711、R03HD078567、R01DK080007、P50HL081009。来自BioVU的25万人的测序,包括这里描述的35022人,由基因组发现联盟资助,该联盟由纳什生物、Illumina和行业合作伙伴Amgen、AbbVie、AstraZeneca、Bayer、BMS、GSK、默克和Novo组成。DNA测序在deCODE genetics使用Illumina的Nov
{"title":"Polygenic Variation Underlying Neutrophil Counts Modifies the Penetrance of Duffy-Null Neutropenia","authors":"John P. Shelley,&nbsp;Mingjian Shi,&nbsp;Lisa Bastarache,&nbsp;Cecilia P. Chung,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Mosley","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70144","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70144","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The Duffy-null phenotype is caused by a genotype that is common among individuals of African ancestry and leads to benign reductions in absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Because clinical reference ranges are typically not calibrated to the normal ANC distribution observed in those with the Duffy-null genotype, individuals with this genotype are more likely to fall below the reference range in the absence of disease with a 4- to 14-fold increased risk of neutropenia (ANC &lt; 1.5 × 10&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/μL) [&lt;span&gt;2-4&lt;/span&gt;]. This misalignment predisposes these individuals to undergo unnecessary diagnostic procedures or experience treatment modifications due to provider concerns about a lower ANC [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. This has prompted efforts to construct clinical reference intervals for ANC for those with the Duffy-null genotype [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype, ANC levels vary widely, and 83%–95% do not meet criteria for neutropenia in cross-sectional studies [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Recent studies have demonstrated that polygenic scores—quantitative measures of an individual's burden of common genetic variants associated with a trait—can capture benign variation in white blood cell (WBC) counts and thus, measure a person's polygenic predisposition to benign leukopenia [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. We have shown that patients with an increased polygenic predisposition to leukopenia are more likely to undergo the same diagnostic escalations that have been associated with Duffy-null associated neutropenia [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. However, it remains unclear whether polygenic variation underlying ANC modifies the penetrance of neutropenia among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype, or whether such scores can enable more precise reference intervals for ANC. In this study, we evaluated whether a polygenic predisposition to lower ANC modifies the risk of neutropenia and influences reference intervals among individuals with the Duffy-null genotype. By leveraging a large cohort of African ancestry individuals with whole genome sequencing and longitudinal clinical data, we aimed to quantify the contribution of polygenic background to ANC variation and assess its potential utility in refining diagnostic thresholds. Our findings have implications for improving the precision of hematologic care and reducing disparities in clinical decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among 2498 adults of African ancestry (65% female, median age 44 years), 1581 (63.2%) participants carried the Duffy-null genotype (Table 1, Figure S1). At baseline, 126 (8.0%) of Duffy-null participants had neutropenia (ANC &lt; 1.5 × 10&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/μL), compared to 1 (0.1%) participant without the genotype. To characterize other genetic causes of benign ANC variation, we tested the association between a polygenic score for ANC (PGS&lt;sub&gt;ANC&lt;/sub&gt;) and clinical outcomes in Duffy-null individuals. For each standard deviation increase in PGS&lt;sub&gt;ANC&lt;/sub&gt;, ANC increased by a mod","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"376-378"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70144","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145558993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DNA Methylation Episignature as a Novel Diagnostic Tool for Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Syndrome DNA甲基化特征作为金刚石-黑扇贫血综合征的新诊断工具
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70141
Paola Quarello, Karim Karimi, Slavica Trajkova, Emanuela Garelli, Mehdi Samadieh, Emanuela Iovino, Tommaso Pippucci, Giovanni Papagni, Sandra Dalfonso, Lucia Corrado, Serena Rizzo, Adriana Carando, Jennifer Kerkhof, Jessica Rzasa, Haley McConkey, Michael Levy, Marco Zecca, Francesca Fioredda, Angelica Barone, Simone Cesaro, Maria Gabelli, Francesca Torchio, Giulia Zucchetti, Maria Elena Cantarini, Paola Corti, Ugo Ramenghi, Franco Locatelli, Franca Fagioli, Bekim Sadikovic, Alfredo Brusco

Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Syndrome (DBAS) is a rare inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) characterized by impaired erythropoiesis and significant genetic heterogeneity. Diagnosis can be challenging due to clinical variability and the lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers. We investigated the evidence for a DNA methylation (DNAm) episignature in a cohort of 80 DBAS patients with causative variants in various ribosomal protein genes: DBA1 (RPS19, n = 30), DBA4 (RPS17, n = 6), DBA5 (RPL35A, n = 8), DBA6 (RPL5, n = 15), DBA7 (RPL11, n = 13), DBA10 (RPS26, n = 8). We identified a distinct and highly accurate episignature biomarker for DBAS, clearly differentiating it from both Fanconi anemia and a broad spectrum of other episignature-positive disorders. Furthermore, we developed a specific DNAm classifier for the clinically similar DBA6 and DBA7 subtypes. Applying the DBAS episignature analysis to six molecularly uncharacterized cases, three exhibited the DBAS pattern. Subsequent genome sequencing identified causative genetic variants in two (RPL5: c.325-380A>G:p.?; RPL26: c.-6 + 3_-6 + 25del:p.?), validating the test robustness. Methylation profiles from two revertant cases (RPS19:P47L and RPS17 full gene deletion) exhibited the DBAS episignature, suggesting it to be a stable epigenetic mark associated with the underlying genetic mutation, likely established early in development. In conclusion, we propose DNAm profiling as a robust diagnostic tool for DBAS, providing a biomarker applicable to all patients with clinical suspicion of the disease and critically aiding in the resolution of variants of uncertain significance and molecularly uncharacterized cases.

Diamond‐Blackfan贫血综合征(DBAS)是一种罕见的遗传性骨髓衰竭综合征(IBMFS),其特征是红细胞功能受损和显著的遗传异质性。由于临床变异性和缺乏敏感和特异性的生物标志物,诊断可能具有挑战性。我们研究了80名具有不同核糖体蛋白基因致病变异的DBA1 (RPS19, n = 30)、DBA4 (RPS17, n = 6)、DBA5 (RPL35A, n = 8)、DBA6 (RPL5, n = 15)、DBA7 (RPL11, n = 13)、DBA10 (RPS26, n = 8)的dbaas患者的DNA甲基化(DNAm)显著特征的证据。我们确定了一种独特且高度准确的DBAS表观特征生物标志物,将其与范可尼贫血和其他广泛的表观特征阳性疾病区分开来。此外,我们为临床相似的DBA6和DBA7亚型开发了一种特异性的DNAm分类器。将dba附加特征分析应用于6个分子特征不明确的案例,其中3个表现出了dba模式。随后的基因组测序确定了两个致病基因变异(RPL5: c.325‐380A>G:p.?; RPL26: c.‐6 + 3_‐6 + 25del:p.?),验证了测试的稳健性。来自两个反向病例(RPS19:P47L和RPS17全基因缺失)的甲基化谱显示出DBAS表观特征,表明它是与潜在基因突变相关的稳定表观遗传标记,可能在发育早期建立。总之,我们建议DNAm分析作为一种强大的DBAS诊断工具,提供一种适用于所有临床怀疑该疾病的患者的生物标志物,并有助于解决不确定意义的变异和分子未表征的病例。
{"title":"DNA Methylation Episignature as a Novel Diagnostic Tool for Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Syndrome","authors":"Paola Quarello,&nbsp;Karim Karimi,&nbsp;Slavica Trajkova,&nbsp;Emanuela Garelli,&nbsp;Mehdi Samadieh,&nbsp;Emanuela Iovino,&nbsp;Tommaso Pippucci,&nbsp;Giovanni Papagni,&nbsp;Sandra Dalfonso,&nbsp;Lucia Corrado,&nbsp;Serena Rizzo,&nbsp;Adriana Carando,&nbsp;Jennifer Kerkhof,&nbsp;Jessica Rzasa,&nbsp;Haley McConkey,&nbsp;Michael Levy,&nbsp;Marco Zecca,&nbsp;Francesca Fioredda,&nbsp;Angelica Barone,&nbsp;Simone Cesaro,&nbsp;Maria Gabelli,&nbsp;Francesca Torchio,&nbsp;Giulia Zucchetti,&nbsp;Maria Elena Cantarini,&nbsp;Paola Corti,&nbsp;Ugo Ramenghi,&nbsp;Franco Locatelli,&nbsp;Franca Fagioli,&nbsp;Bekim Sadikovic,&nbsp;Alfredo Brusco","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70141","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70141","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Syndrome (DBAS) is a rare inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) characterized by impaired erythropoiesis and significant genetic heterogeneity. Diagnosis can be challenging due to clinical variability and the lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers. We investigated the evidence for a DNA methylation (DNAm) episignature in a cohort of 80 DBAS patients with causative variants in various ribosomal protein genes: DBA1 (<i>RPS19</i>, <i>n</i> = 30), DBA4 (<i>RPS17</i>, <i>n</i> = 6), DBA5 (<i>RPL35A</i>, <i>n</i> = 8), DBA6 (<i>RPL5</i>, <i>n</i> = 15), DBA7 (<i>RPL11</i>, <i>n</i> = 13), DBA10 (<i>RPS26</i>, <i>n</i> = 8). We identified a distinct and highly accurate episignature biomarker for DBAS, clearly differentiating it from both Fanconi anemia and a broad spectrum of other episignature-positive disorders. Furthermore, we developed a specific DNAm classifier for the clinically similar DBA6 and DBA7 subtypes. Applying the DBAS episignature analysis to six molecularly uncharacterized cases, three exhibited the DBAS pattern. Subsequent genome sequencing identified causative genetic variants in two (<i>RPL5</i>: c.325-380A&gt;G:p.?; <i>RPL26</i>: c.-6 + 3_-6 + 25del:p.?), validating the test robustness. Methylation profiles from two revertant cases (<i>RPS19</i>:P47L and <i>RPS17</i> full gene deletion) exhibited the DBAS episignature, suggesting it to be a stable epigenetic mark associated with the underlying genetic mutation, likely established early in development. In conclusion, we propose DNAm profiling as a robust diagnostic tool for DBAS, providing a biomarker applicable to all patients with clinical suspicion of the disease and critically aiding in the resolution of variants of uncertain significance and molecularly uncharacterized cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"228-241"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70141","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145532095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BioIron Abstracts BioIron抽象
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70111
{"title":"BioIron Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70111","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"100 S6","pages":"S11-S139"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145529828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recurrent Thrombocytopenia During Caplacizumab Therapy in Acute Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura 急性免疫介导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜在卡普拉珠单抗治疗期间复发性血小板减少
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70139
Kenki Saito, Kazuya Sakai, Atsushi Hamamura, Hidekazu Azumi, Masayuki Kubo, Makoto Osada, Hideo Yagi, Shogo Murata, Masashi Nishikubo, Daichi Nishiyama, Yasunori Ueda, Masanori Matsumoto
<p>Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a fatal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by autoantibodies against disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif member 13 (ADAMTS13) [<span>1</span>]. Until recently, the standard treatments for iTTP were therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression. Caplacizumab, a humanized nanobody targeting the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), demonstrated superiority over placebo in faster normalization of platelet count, a reduction in the composite endpoint (TTP-related death, exacerbation, or at least one thrombotic event), and a decrease in the need for TPE in an integrated analysis of the phase 2 and 3 trials for acute iTTP [<span>2</span>]. Treatment evaluation in the era of caplacizumab was proposed by the International Working Group (IWG) for iTTP [<span>3</span>]. Updated definitions for exacerbation and remission were evaluated based on the suspension of both TPE and anti-VWF therapy, namely, caplacizumab. However, thrombocytopenic events during caplacizumab administration have not yet been analyzed so far. This correspondence reports the findings of our study on the frequency of thrombocytopenic events and their association with relevant clinical parameters in caplacizumab-treated Japanese acute iTTP patients.</p><p>Briefly, 33 episodes in 31 Japanese patients with acute iTTP who were administered caplacizumab between December 2022 and February 2024 were identified in the Nara Medical University Registry on TMA [<span>4</span>]. iTTP diagnosis was as follows: (1) hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, (2) severely decreased ADAMTS13 activity (< 10%), and (3) presence of detectable ADAMTS13 inhibitor (≥ 0.5 Bethesda units [BU]/mL) [<span>5</span>]. Recurrent thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in the platelet count to < 150 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L during caplacizumab therapy after initially achieving a clinical response (CR) with a platelet count of ≥ 150 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L. Twenty patients met the criteria for recurrent thrombocytopenia (thrombocytopenia group), whereas the remaining patients were classified into the non-thrombocytopenia group. Additionally, we defined the event at which the platelet count reached its lowest point after achieving CR as the second dip (Figure S1). Of the 20 patients, 9 underwent intensified treatment, such as TPE or immunosuppressive therapies (intensified treatment group); the remaining 11 patients were classified into the non-intensified treatment group (Figure S2).</p><p>Citrated patient plasma samples taken at diagnosis or during the treatment course were prepared and stored at −30°C until analysis. A sensitive chromogenic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure ADAMTS13 activity (Kainos Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan) [<span>6</span>]. ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer was evaluated using a plasma mixing assay (Bethesda assay); a titer of ≥ 0.5 BU/mL was considered positive. Anti-ADA
免疫介导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(iTTP)是一种致命的血栓性微血管病(TMA),由抗崩解素和具有血小板反应蛋白1型基元13 (ADAMTS13)[1]的金属蛋白酶自身抗体引起。直到最近,iTTP的标准治疗是治疗性血浆交换(TPE)和免疫抑制。Caplacizumab是一种针对血管性血血病因子(VWF) A1结构域的人源化纳米体,在急性iTTP bbb的2期和3期试验的综合分析中显示,与安慰剂相比,Caplacizumab在血小板计数更快正常化、复合终点(ttp相关死亡、恶化或至少一个血栓形成事件)减少以及TPE需求减少方面具有优势。卡普拉珠单抗时代的治疗评价由iTTP bbb国际工作组(IWG)提出。根据暂停TPE和抗vwf治疗(即卡普拉珠单抗)来评估恶化和缓解的最新定义。然而,目前尚未分析卡普拉珠单抗给药期间的血小板减少事件。本文报道了我们对卡帕单抗治疗的日本急性iTTP患者血小板减少事件的频率及其与相关临床参数的关系的研究结果。简而言之,在奈良医科大学TMA注册表中,在2022年12月至2024年2月期间,31名接受卡普拉珠单抗治疗的日本急性iTTP患者中发现了33次发作。iTTP诊断如下:(1)溶血性贫血和血小板减少症;(2)ADAMTS13活性严重降低(&lt; 10%);(3)存在可检测到的ADAMTS13抑制剂(≥0.5 Bethesda单位[BU]/mL)[5]。复发性血小板减少被定义为在卡普拉珠单抗治疗期间,血小板计数在最初达到临床缓解(CR)且血小板计数≥150 × 109/L后,血小板计数下降至150 × 109/L。20例患者符合复发性血小板减少的标准(血小板减少组),其余患者分为非血小板减少组。此外,我们将达到CR后血小板计数达到最低点的事件定义为第二次下降(图S1)。20例患者中,9例接受强化治疗,如TPE或免疫抑制治疗(强化治疗组);其余11例患者分为非强化治疗组(图S2)。在诊断时或治疗过程中采集的柠檬酸患者血浆样品制备并保存在- 30°C,以待分析。采用灵敏的显色酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定ADAMTS13的活性(Kainos Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan)。使用血浆混合试验(Bethesda试验)评估ADAMTS13抑制剂滴度;滴度≥0.5 BU/mL为阳性。采用TECHNOZYM ADAMTS13 INH酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒(Technoclone,维也纳,奥地利)检测抗ADAMTS13 IgG水平。采用自动凝血分析仪CN-3000 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan)检测VWF抗原(VWF:Ag)和VWF里斯托素辅因子活性(VWF:RCo) (Siemens Healthineers)。在以下时间点对ADAMTS13和VWF相关参数进行时程评估:(1)首次就诊,(2)血小板计数≥150 × 109/L的初始CR,(3)第二次下降,(4)卡placizumab治疗结束时,(5)卡placizumab治疗结束后1周(图S1)。分析从第一次TPE到ADAMTS13活性持续≥10%的时间与初始ADAMTS13抑制剂和抗ADAMTS13 IgG水平的相关性。分类变量以频率表示,连续变量以四分位数范围的中位数表示。组间比较采用Fisher精确检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,时间变化采用Friedman检验,相关性采用Spearman秩检验。P &; 0.05 b0;采用EZR[7]进行分析。总的来说,31例经卡普拉珠单抗治疗的急性iTTP患者的33次发作被纳入评估。20例血小板减少组患者中有17例和13例非血小板减少组患者中有12例在首次iTTP发作时入组。我们回顾性比较了有血小板减少症和无血小板减少症患者的临床特征、实验室参数和治疗方法的差异(表S1)。两组间的实验室数据、初始神经症状的比例和治疗方法无显著差异。所有患者均达到cr。将血小板减少患者分为强化组(n = 9)和非强化组(n = 11)。临床参数及治疗详情见表1。 在强化治疗组,主要针对复发性血小板减少需要额外的治疗,包括TPE (n = 4)、FFP输注(n = 1)、利妥昔单抗(n = 3)、强的松龙脉冲治疗(n = 2)和环磷酰胺(n = 2)(表S2)。Bethesda法测定的ADAMTS13抑制剂初始滴度中位数在强化治疗组显著升高(13.5比4.6 BU/mL, p = 0.015),而初始抗ADAMTS13 IgG水平无显著差异。强化治疗组初始VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag中位数较低(0.38 vs. 0.62, p = 0.026)。TPE疗程的次数和利妥昔单抗的比例或时间在两组之间具有可比性。相比之下,强化治疗组达到ADAMTS13活性≥10%的中位时间(43天对19天,p = 0.003)和卡普拉珠单抗治疗的持续时间(47天对36天,p = 0.014)明显更长。接下来,我们比较了两组之间第二次下降时的实验室参数。强化治疗组第二次血小板计数中位数显著低于强化治疗组(66 × 109/L vs. 109 × 109/L, p = 0.018)。血红蛋白和乳酸脱氢酶水平各组间无显著差异。相比之下,强化组ADAMTS13活性中位数显著降低(0.5% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.015), ADAMTS13抑制剂滴度中位数(3.6 vs. &lt; 0.5 BU/mL, p = 0.036)和抗ADAMTS13 IgG抗体水平中位数(69.3 vs. 8.0 U/mL, p = 0.012)均显著升高。分别评估强化治疗组和非强化治疗组VWF:RCo和VWF:Ag水平的变化(图1)。在治疗期间几乎所有时间点,两组的VWF:RCo均降至定量下限(12.13%)。在强化组中,这两个参数随时间变化显著,没有两两变化,而在治疗期间,它们低于基线或非强化组的治疗后。在本研究纳入的所有患者中,初始ADAMTS13抑制剂滴度与首次TPE至ADAMTS13活性≥10%的时间呈正相关(r = 0.672, p &lt; 0.001)(图S3A),而与初始抗ADAMTS13 IgG水平的相关性为0.388 (n = 30, p = 0.034)(图S3B)。在卡普拉单抗治疗的iTTP患者中,超过一半的患者观察到复发性血小板减少。一些患者接受了额外的治疗,如重新开始血浆置换或增强免疫抑制。2021年IWG共识报告将临床结果重新定义为:临床恶化为停止TPE或抗vwf治疗后30天内血小板计数下降150 × 109/L,临床复发为临床缓解后记录的严重ADAMTS13缺乏症的类似下降。然而,在我们的研究中观察到的卡普拉珠单抗期间复发性血小板减少症未被纳入,也未提出任何管理策略。值得注意的是,在现实世界中关于卡普拉珠单抗使用的报告中,只有德国-奥地利组记录了约10%的一线病例在使用卡普拉珠单抗期间病情加重。在需要强化治疗的复发性血小板减少病例中,与未强化治疗组相比,患者在第二次滴注时血小板计数下降更明显,ADAMTS13活性降低,ADAMTS13抑制剂滴度更高。这些患者在发病时抑制剂滴度也较高,ADAMTS13恢复延迟,表明iTTP的免疫状态
{"title":"Recurrent Thrombocytopenia During Caplacizumab Therapy in Acute Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura","authors":"Kenki Saito,&nbsp;Kazuya Sakai,&nbsp;Atsushi Hamamura,&nbsp;Hidekazu Azumi,&nbsp;Masayuki Kubo,&nbsp;Makoto Osada,&nbsp;Hideo Yagi,&nbsp;Shogo Murata,&nbsp;Masashi Nishikubo,&nbsp;Daichi Nishiyama,&nbsp;Yasunori Ueda,&nbsp;Masanori Matsumoto","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70139","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70139","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a fatal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by autoantibodies against disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif member 13 (ADAMTS13) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Until recently, the standard treatments for iTTP were therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression. Caplacizumab, a humanized nanobody targeting the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), demonstrated superiority over placebo in faster normalization of platelet count, a reduction in the composite endpoint (TTP-related death, exacerbation, or at least one thrombotic event), and a decrease in the need for TPE in an integrated analysis of the phase 2 and 3 trials for acute iTTP [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Treatment evaluation in the era of caplacizumab was proposed by the International Working Group (IWG) for iTTP [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Updated definitions for exacerbation and remission were evaluated based on the suspension of both TPE and anti-VWF therapy, namely, caplacizumab. However, thrombocytopenic events during caplacizumab administration have not yet been analyzed so far. This correspondence reports the findings of our study on the frequency of thrombocytopenic events and their association with relevant clinical parameters in caplacizumab-treated Japanese acute iTTP patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Briefly, 33 episodes in 31 Japanese patients with acute iTTP who were administered caplacizumab between December 2022 and February 2024 were identified in the Nara Medical University Registry on TMA [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. iTTP diagnosis was as follows: (1) hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, (2) severely decreased ADAMTS13 activity (&lt; 10%), and (3) presence of detectable ADAMTS13 inhibitor (≥ 0.5 Bethesda units [BU]/mL) [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Recurrent thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in the platelet count to &lt; 150 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L during caplacizumab therapy after initially achieving a clinical response (CR) with a platelet count of ≥ 150 × 10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;/L. Twenty patients met the criteria for recurrent thrombocytopenia (thrombocytopenia group), whereas the remaining patients were classified into the non-thrombocytopenia group. Additionally, we defined the event at which the platelet count reached its lowest point after achieving CR as the second dip (Figure S1). Of the 20 patients, 9 underwent intensified treatment, such as TPE or immunosuppressive therapies (intensified treatment group); the remaining 11 patients were classified into the non-intensified treatment group (Figure S2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Citrated patient plasma samples taken at diagnosis or during the treatment course were prepared and stored at −30°C until analysis. A sensitive chromogenic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure ADAMTS13 activity (Kainos Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan) [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer was evaluated using a plasma mixing assay (Bethesda assay); a titer of ≥ 0.5 BU/mL was considered positive. Anti-ADA","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"356-360"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145498666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific T-Cell Engager Therapy in Systemic AL Amyloidosis 双特异性t细胞参与治疗全身性AL淀粉样变性的安全性和有效性。
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70140
Matthew J. Rees, Jack Khouri, Ariel F. Grajales-Cruz, Saurabh S. Zanwar, Utkarsh Goel, Shonali Midha, Julian Kelley, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes, Shahzad Raza, James A. Davis, Kimberly Green, Doris K. Hansen, Rahul Banerjee, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Giada Bianchi, Douglas W. Sborov, Sarah Lee, Shaji K. Kumar, Rachid Baz, Faiz Anwer, Lekha Mikkilineni, Omar Nadeem, Yi Lin, Larry D. Anderson Jr
<p>Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by the production of aberrant light chains which misfold and accumulate to cause progressive organ damage. Plasma cell-directed therapy to curtail amyloidogenic light-chain production and permit organ recovery is central to management. The effectiveness of therapy is measured by the extent of clonal free light-chain (FLC) reduction defined by the hematological response criteria, with complete responses (CR) associated with improved organ recovery and survival [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Despite the introduction of daratumumab for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, disease responses are suboptimal in approximately 50% of cases, and many later relapse [<span>2, 3</span>]. Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCE) have produced unprecedented outcomes in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), and whether they can be safely applied to AL amyloidosis is a key clinical question. To date, evidence for TCE in AL amyloidosis is limited to small case series, and their safety—with regard to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), infections, and early organ deterioration in this vulnerable population—remains poorly defined [<span>4-6</span>].</p><p>This retrospective study evaluated all AL amyloidosis patients who received TCE therapy targeting BCMA or GPRC5D between February 2023 and March 2025. Data were collected from nine United States (US) academic centers participating in the US MM Immunotherapy Consortium. Each center obtained Institutional Review Board approval for participation. Dosing followed prescribing information; during step-up, subsequent therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician. Talquetamab was dosed according to the biweekly dosing schedule.</p><p>CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria [<span>7</span>]. Hematologic toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0. Infectious disease prophylaxis, use of growth colony-stimulating factor, and treatment of CRS and ICANS were according to institutional guidelines [<span>8</span>]. Hematologic responses were defined according to consensus response criteria [<span>1</span>]. Cardiac and renal responses were defined according to the graded response criteria [<span>9</span>], and cardiac stage per the European modification of the Mayo 2004 model [<span>10</span>]. Data were analyzed using ‘<i>R</i>’ v4.3.2.</p><p>Twenty-nine patients with AL amyloidosis treated with TCEs were included: teclistamab (<i>n</i> = 19), elranatamab (<i>n</i> = 6), and talquetamab (<i>n</i> = 4). Baseline patient, disease and treatment characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 72 years (IQR: 66–75), with a female predominance (59%). Cardiac stage prior to TCE was known in 26 patients; 2 patients were stage 3A (8%), and 5 patients were stage 3B (19%). Most patients had l
系统性轻链(AL)淀粉样变性是一种浆细胞肿瘤,其特征是产生异常的轻链,这些轻链错误折叠和积聚导致进行性器官损害。浆细胞定向治疗减少淀粉样蛋白轻链的产生并允许器官恢复是治疗的核心。治疗的有效性是通过血液学反应标准定义的克隆游离轻链(FLC)减少程度来衡量的,完全缓解(CR)与器官恢复和生存期的改善相关。尽管引入了daratumumab治疗新诊断的AL淀粉样变性,但大约50%的病例的疾病反应不理想,许多病例后来复发[2,3]。双特异性t细胞结合剂(TCE)在复发性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗中产生了前所未有的效果,它们是否可以安全地应用于AL淀粉样变性是一个关键的临床问题。迄今为止,TCE在AL淀粉样变中的证据仅限于小病例系列,其安全性-关于细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),感染和易感人群的早期器官退化-仍然不明确[4-6]。这项回顾性研究评估了2023年2月至2025年3月期间接受针对BCMA或GPRC5D的TCE治疗的所有AL淀粉样变性患者。数据来自参加美国MM免疫治疗联盟的9个美国学术中心。每个中心都获得了机构审查委员会的批准。按照处方信息给药;在升级过程中,后续治疗由主治医师决定。Talquetamab按照两周给药计划给药。CRS和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)根据美国移植和细胞治疗学会标准[7]进行分级。血液学毒性根据不良事件通用术语标准v5.0进行分级。传染病预防、生长集落刺激因子的使用以及CRS和ICANS的治疗均按照机构指南bbb进行。血液学反应根据一致反应标准[1]定义。根据分级反应标准[9]定义心脏和肾脏反应,根据Mayo 2004模型的欧洲修订[10]定义心脏分期。使用‘ R ’ v4.3.2对数据进行分析。纳入29例接受TCEs治疗的AL淀粉样变性患者:特司他单抗(n = 19)、埃尔那他单抗(n = 6)和塔克他单抗(n = 4)。基线患者、疾病和治疗特征总结于表1。中位年龄为72岁(IQR: 66-75),以女性为主(59%)。26例患者已知TCE前的心脏分期;2例为3A期(8%),5例为3B期(19%)。大多数患者为λ轻链同型(59%);31%发生t(11;14)易位。6例患者诊断性骨髓浆细胞(BMPC)负荷未知。在剩余的患者中,65%的患者BMPCs≥20%。10名患者(34%)在诊断时BMPCs≥60%,或TCE前FLC比值≥100。8例患者先前接受过bcma定向治疗(n = 4抗体药物偶联物[ADC], n = 3 CAR T, n = 1 ADC + TCE)。至于器官受累,66%为心脏受累,59%为肾脏受累。45%的患者发生CRS(1级,n = 8; 2级,n = 5;≥3级,n = 0), 14%的患者发生ICANS(1级,n = 3; 2级,n = 1;≥3级,n = 0)。7例患者接受tocilizumab治疗;1例患者接受预防性tocilizumab治疗。按TCE划分的CRS率见图S1。第1周期无患者需要入住重症监护病房。CRS的发病是双峰的,41%发生在第2天,23%发生在第5天。20名患者(69%)接受了免疫球蛋白预防;开始IVIg的中位时间为28天(IQR 18,63)。10例患者感染≥1级,其中6例感染≥3级;研究期间共发生17次感染事件(11次细菌感染,6次病毒感染)。IVIg开始后,≥3级感染率为25%(5/20)。在25例有完整血液学不良事件数据的患者中,治疗后出现≥3级贫血、血小板减少和中性粒细胞减少的患者分别占8%、20%和20%。血液学总缓解率(ORR)为76%,包括66% CR, 7%非常好部分缓解(VGPR)和3%部分缓解(PR)。2例患者未接受疾病重新评估;1例如下所述的治疗早期出现的死亡,1例在第2周期之前失去随访。TCE的ORR如图S2所示。6例患者进行了下一代流式细胞术可测量残留疾病(MRD)评估,所有患者均获得MRD阴性。在应答者中,达到VGPR或更好的中位时间为29天(IQR: 18,56)。在先前接受BCL2抑制剂治疗的4例t(11;14)患者中,TCE治疗的ORR为75%。 游泳者图1描述了接受的TCE、血液学反应时间和生存率。在接受TCE治疗时符合心脏反应评估条件的14例患者中(升高的b型利钠肽[BNP] &gt; 150 ng/L或n端前BNP &gt; 650 ng/L), 64%的患者获得了反应(心脏PR, n = 4;心脏VGPR, n = 2;心脏CR, n = 3)。通过Kaplan-Meier方法,达到心脏反应的中位时间为4.6个月(95% CI 2.7-未达到)。在TCE开始时符合肾反应评估条件的4例患者(基线时1 g/天蛋白尿)中,所有患者均获得反应(肾PR, n = 1;肾VGPR, n = 2;肾CR, n = 1),中位肾反应时间为3.8个月(95% CI 0.7-未达到)。符合条件的患者6个月标志性器官反应率心脏为57%,肾脏为75%。中位随访时间为8.8个月,1年总生存率为77% (95% CI: 62%-95%)(图2)。6人死亡,其中4人在TCE治疗期间死亡。1例心脏受累患者(Mayo 2004年IIIB期)在替司他单增加剂量期间(第1周期,第2天)出现心室颤动停搏,无CRS特征。一名没有心脏或肾脏受累的患者在开始服用talquetamab 2个月后死于细菌性败血症。一例骨髓瘤并发患者的死亡是由于特司他单疗程1后骨髓瘤进行性高钙血症和急性肾损伤,一例心脏和肾脏受累的患者在骨折手术固定术中死亡。其余2例死亡发生在治疗结束后:1例原因不明,1例心脏受累患者在停用替司他单抗3个月后死于心力衰竭,尽管获得了血液学cr。这项研究代表了TCE治疗AL淀粉样变性的最大队列研究。TCE诱导了高比率的快速和深度血液学反应,这些反应通常伴随着早期器官反应。尽管心脏和肾脏受累的发生率很高,但CRS的发生率很低,没有≥3级的事件。相比之下,感染性并发症的发生率与TCE的广泛应用一致。非复发死亡率(NRM)主要反映了该队列的疾病晚期,有2例死亡(7%)归因于心脏原因,但罕见的致命治疗相关事件继发于CRS或感染。TCE的显著疗效从MM扩展到AL淀粉样变性。从生物学角度来看,AL淀粉样变性的惰性、低肿瘤负荷的浆细胞克隆特征可能更容易发生TCE,这在低疾病负荷环境中非常有效[11,12]。我们的研究结果和其他现实世界的经验支持这一点;teclistamab的两个病例系列显示ORR在88%至100%之间,而elranatamab的一系列病例显示ORR为100%,CR率为67%[4-6]。这些结果与复发性淀粉样变性的替代疗法相比是有利的;相比之下,泊马度胺、贝兰他单抗马福多汀和卡非佐米在达拉单抗naïve人群中产生≥29%-46%的VGPR率[13-15]。与FLC根除的深度和速度一致,我们观察到在新诊断疾病中,早期器官反应接近达拉图单抗-硼替佐米-环磷酰胺-地塞米松的报告;在该研究中,6个月心脏和肾脏反应分别为42%和54%,而在我们的队列中,这两个数据分别为57%和75%,尽管数据有限[2,3]。我们对暴露于BCL2抑制的t(11;14)患者75%的ORR也支持TCE作为venet
{"title":"The Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific T-Cell Engager Therapy in Systemic AL Amyloidosis","authors":"Matthew J. Rees,&nbsp;Jack Khouri,&nbsp;Ariel F. Grajales-Cruz,&nbsp;Saurabh S. Zanwar,&nbsp;Utkarsh Goel,&nbsp;Shonali Midha,&nbsp;Julian Kelley,&nbsp;Omar Castaneda Puglianini,&nbsp;Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes,&nbsp;Shahzad Raza,&nbsp;James A. Davis,&nbsp;Kimberly Green,&nbsp;Doris K. Hansen,&nbsp;Rahul Banerjee,&nbsp;Surbhi Sidana,&nbsp;Krina K. Patel,&nbsp;Giada Bianchi,&nbsp;Douglas W. Sborov,&nbsp;Sarah Lee,&nbsp;Shaji K. Kumar,&nbsp;Rachid Baz,&nbsp;Faiz Anwer,&nbsp;Lekha Mikkilineni,&nbsp;Omar Nadeem,&nbsp;Yi Lin,&nbsp;Larry D. Anderson Jr","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70140","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70140","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by the production of aberrant light chains which misfold and accumulate to cause progressive organ damage. Plasma cell-directed therapy to curtail amyloidogenic light-chain production and permit organ recovery is central to management. The effectiveness of therapy is measured by the extent of clonal free light-chain (FLC) reduction defined by the hematological response criteria, with complete responses (CR) associated with improved organ recovery and survival [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite the introduction of daratumumab for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, disease responses are suboptimal in approximately 50% of cases, and many later relapse [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCE) have produced unprecedented outcomes in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), and whether they can be safely applied to AL amyloidosis is a key clinical question. To date, evidence for TCE in AL amyloidosis is limited to small case series, and their safety—with regard to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), infections, and early organ deterioration in this vulnerable population—remains poorly defined [&lt;span&gt;4-6&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This retrospective study evaluated all AL amyloidosis patients who received TCE therapy targeting BCMA or GPRC5D between February 2023 and March 2025. Data were collected from nine United States (US) academic centers participating in the US MM Immunotherapy Consortium. Each center obtained Institutional Review Board approval for participation. Dosing followed prescribing information; during step-up, subsequent therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician. Talquetamab was dosed according to the biweekly dosing schedule.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;]. Hematologic toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0. Infectious disease prophylaxis, use of growth colony-stimulating factor, and treatment of CRS and ICANS were according to institutional guidelines [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;]. Hematologic responses were defined according to consensus response criteria [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Cardiac and renal responses were defined according to the graded response criteria [&lt;span&gt;9&lt;/span&gt;], and cardiac stage per the European modification of the Mayo 2004 model [&lt;span&gt;10&lt;/span&gt;]. Data were analyzed using ‘&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;’ v4.3.2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twenty-nine patients with AL amyloidosis treated with TCEs were included: teclistamab (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 19), elranatamab (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 6), and talquetamab (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 4). Baseline patient, disease and treatment characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 72 years (IQR: 66–75), with a female predominance (59%). Cardiac stage prior to TCE was known in 26 patients; 2 patients were stage 3A (8%), and 5 patients were stage 3B (19%). Most patients had l","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 1","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70140","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145491636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental Pollution Triggers Inflammation In Vivo and is Associated With Higher Risk MDS in an Urban Cohort 在城市人群中,环境污染引发体内炎症并与MDS高风险相关
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70132
Megha Verma, Matthew P. Davidsohn, Christopher Maximilian Arends, Divij Verma, Srabani Sahu, Kith Pradhan, Seyedeh Sharareh Dehghani, Hamsa Murli, Sakshi Jasra, Ritesh K. Aggarwal, Hui Zhang, Michael Wysota, Dean Hosgood, Amit Verma, Siddhartha Jaiswal, Yiyu Zou, Aditi Shastri

{"title":"Environmental Pollution Triggers Inflammation In Vivo and is Associated With Higher Risk MDS in an Urban Cohort","authors":"Megha Verma,&nbsp;Matthew P. Davidsohn,&nbsp;Christopher Maximilian Arends,&nbsp;Divij Verma,&nbsp;Srabani Sahu,&nbsp;Kith Pradhan,&nbsp;Seyedeh Sharareh Dehghani,&nbsp;Hamsa Murli,&nbsp;Sakshi Jasra,&nbsp;Ritesh K. Aggarwal,&nbsp;Hui Zhang,&nbsp;Michael Wysota,&nbsp;Dean Hosgood,&nbsp;Amit Verma,&nbsp;Siddhartha Jaiswal,&nbsp;Yiyu Zou,&nbsp;Aditi Shastri","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70132","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure>\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"346-349"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145485694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of the VIALE-A Regimen for AML With Monocytic Differentiation as Determined by French-American-British Subtyping and Gene Expression Profiling. 由法国-美国-英国亚型和基因表达谱确定的VIALE-A方案治疗单核细胞分化AML的疗效
IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70136
Shyam A Patel,Jonathan M Gerber
{"title":"Efficacy of the VIALE-A Regimen for AML With Monocytic Differentiation as Determined by French-American-British Subtyping and Gene Expression Profiling.","authors":"Shyam A Patel,Jonathan M Gerber","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70136","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145477556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dermatologic Adverse Effects With Elranatamab Mimicking Talquetamab Elranatamab模拟Talquetamab的皮肤不良反应。
IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70130
M. Bakri Hammami, Sean P. Haney, Danny DeAvila, Julia Fadul, Christine E. Simonelli, Samantha C. Seitzler, Sairekha Ravichandran, Melissa Alsina, Brandon Blue, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Rachid Baz, Kenneth H. Shain
<p>Treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have recently expanded with the approval of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) [<span>1-4</span>]. These novel agents are engineered to simultaneously engage tumor antigens and immune effector cell receptors, thereby activating T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity against malignant plasma cells [<span>1, 5</span>]. As “off-the-shelf” therapies, BsAbs address key limitations of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, including prolonged manufacturing time, limited accessibility, and a generally more favorable toxicity profile [<span>6</span>]. Currently, the FDA has granted accelerated approval to three BsAb products for patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior lines of therapy: Teclistamab, Elranatamab, and Talquetamab [<span>6</span>]. All three target CD3 on T cells but differ in their tumor-specific targets: Teclistamab and Elranatamab target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), while Talquetamab targets GPRC5D (G protein-coupled receptor Family C Group 5 Member D) [<span>7</span>]. These agents have demonstrated high response rates in heavily pretreated patients, including those relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy, highlighting their important role in the management of MM [<span>8</span>].</p><p>Despite their efficacy, BsAbs are associated with a range of toxicities, some class-wide and others antigen-specific [<span>8</span>]. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is common across BsAbs, typically occurring during step-up dosing or shortly after the first full dose [<span>5</span>]. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) has been reported as well, though at a lower incidence (1–14) [<span>5</span>]. Cytopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia are frequently observed, with higher-grade hematologic toxicities more prevalent among BCMA-directed BsAbs [<span>9</span>]. In contrast, target-specific toxicities have also been documented. Most notably, Talquetamab is associated with GPRC5D-related “on target-off tumor” side effects, including (i) taste disturbances and dry mouth, (ii) weight loss, and (iii) dermatologic toxicities such as xerosis, onychomadesis, pruritic maculopapular rash, and palmar/plantar desquamation [<span>8, 10</span>]. These adverse events are attributed to GPRC5D expression in highly keratinized tissue, including hair follicles and nails [<span>10, 11</span>]. BCMA-directed BsAb are more commonly associated with hepatotoxicity, infections, neutropenia, and CRS [<span>12</span>]. Elranatamab, in particular, was associated with dermatologic adverse events in the MagnetisMM-3 trial, though these were limited to injection site reactions (26.8%) [<span>12</span>] Interestingly, we have observed Talquetamab-like dermatologic toxicities in approximately 11% of patients treated with Elranatamab at our institution. To better characterize these toxicities, we present our experience with seven patients who developed dermatologic events while receivin
随着双特异性抗体(BsAbs)的批准,复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)的治疗选择最近有所扩大[1-4]。这些新型药物被设计成同时与肿瘤抗原和免疫效应细胞受体结合,从而激活t细胞介导的针对恶性浆细胞的细胞毒性[1,5]。作为“现成的”疗法,BsAbs解决了嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法的主要局限性,包括制造时间长、可及性有限以及通常更有利的毒性特征[6]。目前,FDA已经加速批准了三种BsAb产品,用于已经接受过至少四种先前治疗的RRMM患者:Teclistamab, Elranatamab和Talquetamab[6]。这三种药物都靶向T细胞上的CD3,但它们的肿瘤特异性靶点不同:Teclistamab和Elranatamab靶向b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA),而Talquetamab靶向GPRC5D (G蛋白偶联受体家族C组5成员D)[7]。这些药物在大量预先治疗的患者中显示出高反应率,包括CAR - t细胞治疗后复发的患者,突出了它们在MM[8]治疗中的重要作用。尽管其疗效显著,但bsab与一系列毒性有关,有些是类毒性,有些是抗原特异性的。细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)在bsab中很常见,通常发生在增加剂量期间或第一次全剂量bbb后不久。免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)也有报道,尽管发病率较低(1-14)。经常观察到细胞减少和低γ球蛋白血症,在bcma导向的bsab中更普遍存在更高级别的血液学毒性。相比之下,靶标特异性毒性也有文献记载。最值得注意的是,Talquetamab与gprc5d相关的“靶外肿瘤”副作用相关,包括(i)味觉障碍和口干,(ii)体重减轻,以及(iii)皮肤毒性,如干燥症、甲状瘤、瘙痒性斑疹疹和掌/足底脱屑[8,10]。这些不良事件归因于GPRC5D在高度角化组织中的表达,包括毛囊和指甲[10,11]。bcma导向的BsAb更常与肝毒性、感染、中性粒细胞减少症和CRS bbb相关。特别是,在MagnetisMM-3试验中,Elranatamab与皮肤不良事件相关,尽管这些不良事件仅限于注射部位反应(26.8%)。有趣的是,我们在我院接受Elranatamab治疗的患者中观察到约11%的talquetamab样皮肤毒性。为了更好地描述这些毒性,我们介绍了我们在接受Elranatamab时发生皮肤事件的7例患者的经验。我们对2023年10月至2025年5月期间在本中心接受Elranatamab治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。筛选所有64例患者的临床记录以确定皮肤不良事件。收集了发生皮肤毒性的患者的详细数据,包括人口统计学、治疗史、皮肤反应的时间和类型、管理和结果。毒性分级遵循不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) v5.0,治疗反应按照国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)标准进行评估。为了评估其他BCMA双特异性的类似事件,我们回顾了2022年12月至2025年6月期间接受Teclistamab治疗的所有77例患者的皮肤不良事件。对数据进行描述性分析。这项研究得到了莫菲特癌症中心机构审查委员会的批准。在2023年10月至2025年5月期间,我们中心有64例患者接受了Elranatamab,其中7例(11%)出现了与Talquetamab相似的皮肤不良反应。患者特征总结于表S1。开始治疗时的中位年龄为74岁(范围:52-81岁)。报告的皮肤毒性包括干燥伴皮肤脱皮(6/7),斑疹丘疹(5/7)和爪营养不良(2/7)。4例患者发生2级事件,3例发生3级事件。1例患者(P3)的3级黄斑疹活检显示界面皮炎伴嗜酸性粒细胞,与药疹一致(图1)。所有患者均无皮肤病或自身免疫性疾病史。大多数患者(6/7)使用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(Bactrim), 1/7使用阿托伐酮,所有患者均使用阿昔洛韦进行预防。在接受Bactrim治疗的患者中,4名患者在Elranatamab治疗前3个月开始治疗,2名患者同时开始治疗。中位毒性发作时间为32天(范围:10-66),中位剂量为4次(范围:3-10),包括加强剂量。从骨髓瘤诊断到elranatumab开始治疗的中位时间为128个月(范围:23-151),其中中位有6个先前的治疗线(范围:4-11)。4例患者既往有BCMA CAR-T;没有人事先服用过Talquetamab。 局部润肤剂改善了局部2级皮肤事件,而局部或口服糖皮质激素和暂时中断治疗或减少给药频率对弥漫性皮疹和3级事件有反应。皮肤毒性在平均26天(范围:14-60天)后消退。3例患者需要治疗,其中1例再次出现皮疹复发。两名患者还出现了诵读困难、食欲不振和体重下降。最终,两名患者(P1和P3)分别在治疗4个月和2个月后因毒性停用Elranatamab。在可评估的患者中,5名患者在30天内出现反应:2名部分缓解(PR), 2名完全缓解(CR), 1名非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)。1例患者(P5)在30天没有进行评估,但在第90天有CR, 1例患者(P7)在数据收集时还没有到第30天。从骨髓瘤诊断到数据收集的中位总生存期(OS)为113个月(范围:26-166),而中位无进展生存期为3个月(范围:1-13)。在数据截止时,4/7的患者仍然存活并继续使用Elranatamab。1例患者(P1)存活,由于毒性原因从Elranatamab切换到Talquetamab。该患者在服用Talquetamab后出现发音困难、吞咽困难、瘙痒性皮疹和爪营养不良。2例患者(P3和P4)在数据收集时已死亡。为了进行比较,我们回顾了2022年12月至2025年6月期间接受Teclistamab治疗的所有77例患者。5名患者(6%)报告了以局部红斑性瘙痒斑块为特征的注射部位反应。在第一次全剂量的Teclistamab治疗后,只有一名患者报告出现瘙痒性黄斑丘疹,涉及上背部,局部类固醇治疗改善。该患者在开始Teclistamab前1个月接受了Talquetamab治疗,出现了多种皮肤副作用。这些发现突出了Elranatamab皮肤毒性的重要且未被报道的副作用,类似于Talquetamab报道的副作用。识别和管理与BsAb治疗相关的皮肤毒性正变得越来越重要,因为这些药物在RRMM的治疗范例中被早期纳入。这些副作用经常导致治疗延迟和中断,正如我们的三个病人的情况。在1/2期MonumenTAL-1试验中,与Talquetamab相关的皮肤毒性包括皮疹(30%-40%的患者)和其他皮肤毒性(56%-73%)通常在第20天至第30天出现,事件持续时间中位数为26-39天。54%-63%的患者出现指甲改变[3,13]。在我们的队列中,皮肤事件的时间、临床特征和持续时间具有可比性,尽管发生率较低(~11%)。虽然不能完全排除其他原因引起的药物相关皮疹,但发病时间(埃尔那他单抗开始治疗后60天内)、再次暴露后复发以及治疗中断或剂量减少后消退强烈支持埃尔那他单抗是可能的病原体。管理策略与Talquetamab相似:局部使用润肤剂治疗低级别事件,皮质类固醇(局部和全身)治疗更广泛的影响,并在保持持久反应的特定病例中减少给药频率,这与2期MagnetisMM-3研究和其他BsAb试验一致[12,14]。有趣的是,我们还发现两名患者出现了诵读困难、
{"title":"Dermatologic Adverse Effects With Elranatamab Mimicking Talquetamab","authors":"M. Bakri Hammami,&nbsp;Sean P. Haney,&nbsp;Danny DeAvila,&nbsp;Julia Fadul,&nbsp;Christine E. Simonelli,&nbsp;Samantha C. Seitzler,&nbsp;Sairekha Ravichandran,&nbsp;Melissa Alsina,&nbsp;Brandon Blue,&nbsp;Ariel Grajales-Cruz,&nbsp;Rachid Baz,&nbsp;Kenneth H. Shain","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70130","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70130","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have recently expanded with the approval of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) [&lt;span&gt;1-4&lt;/span&gt;]. These novel agents are engineered to simultaneously engage tumor antigens and immune effector cell receptors, thereby activating T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity against malignant plasma cells [&lt;span&gt;1, 5&lt;/span&gt;]. As “off-the-shelf” therapies, BsAbs address key limitations of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, including prolonged manufacturing time, limited accessibility, and a generally more favorable toxicity profile [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. Currently, the FDA has granted accelerated approval to three BsAb products for patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior lines of therapy: Teclistamab, Elranatamab, and Talquetamab [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. All three target CD3 on T cells but differ in their tumor-specific targets: Teclistamab and Elranatamab target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), while Talquetamab targets GPRC5D (G protein-coupled receptor Family C Group 5 Member D) [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;]. These agents have demonstrated high response rates in heavily pretreated patients, including those relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy, highlighting their important role in the management of MM [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite their efficacy, BsAbs are associated with a range of toxicities, some class-wide and others antigen-specific [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;]. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is common across BsAbs, typically occurring during step-up dosing or shortly after the first full dose [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) has been reported as well, though at a lower incidence (1–14) [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Cytopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia are frequently observed, with higher-grade hematologic toxicities more prevalent among BCMA-directed BsAbs [&lt;span&gt;9&lt;/span&gt;]. In contrast, target-specific toxicities have also been documented. Most notably, Talquetamab is associated with GPRC5D-related “on target-off tumor” side effects, including (i) taste disturbances and dry mouth, (ii) weight loss, and (iii) dermatologic toxicities such as xerosis, onychomadesis, pruritic maculopapular rash, and palmar/plantar desquamation [&lt;span&gt;8, 10&lt;/span&gt;]. These adverse events are attributed to GPRC5D expression in highly keratinized tissue, including hair follicles and nails [&lt;span&gt;10, 11&lt;/span&gt;]. BCMA-directed BsAb are more commonly associated with hepatotoxicity, infections, neutropenia, and CRS [&lt;span&gt;12&lt;/span&gt;]. Elranatamab, in particular, was associated with dermatologic adverse events in the MagnetisMM-3 trial, though these were limited to injection site reactions (26.8%) [&lt;span&gt;12&lt;/span&gt;] Interestingly, we have observed Talquetamab-like dermatologic toxicities in approximately 11% of patients treated with Elranatamab at our institution. To better characterize these toxicities, we present our experience with seven patients who developed dermatologic events while receivin","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 1","pages":"218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70130","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145477560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Hematology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1