Richard K. Kandasamy, Joel-Sean Hsu, Steve Eacker, Hayley Magelson, Zachary D. Stephens, Angela Dispenzieri, Esteban Braggio, P. Leif Bergsagel, Rafael Fonseca, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Shaji K. Kumar, Linda B. Baughn, Wilson I. Gonsalves, Akhilesh Pandey
<p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy with heterogeneous clinical courses despite morphological similarity, a phenomenon driven primarily by the genetic abnormalities seen in the disease. A plethora of primary genetic abnormalities, such as translocations involving immunoglobulin loci and trisomies, along with secondary chromosomal aberrations (mainly 17p, 1p, 13q deletions, 1q gains, and/or <i>MYC</i> translocations) are present in MM, with the latter underlying the serial progression of MGUS to MM [<span>1</span>]. Cytogenetic analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the gold-standard method for identifying these genetic abnormalities. However, owing to the poor proliferative capacity of plasma cells in frequently hemodiluted bone marrow aspirates, it is often difficult to get adequate yields of plasma cell metaphases, preventing karyotyping analysis and necessitating interphase FISH [<span>2</span>]. This limitation has largely been overcome by using a variety of FISH probes, which allowed detection of various genetic alterations including numerical amplifications or deletions, structural rearrangements, and translocations [<span>3</span>]. However, there are still several limitations of FISH-based analyses including detection sensitivity and inter-laboratory variation in analysis and scoring [<span>4</span>]. More importantly, genomic variations can also result in false positive/negative findings—for instance, 50% of MYC rearrangements are missed by the break apart probe due to variable MYC genomic rearrangements [<span>5</span>].</p>