Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116104
Kamil Erozkan, David Liska, Ayda Oktem, Ali Alipouriani, Lukas Schabl, Michael A Valente, Jacob A Miller, Andrei S Purysko, Scott R Steele, Emre Gorgun
Background: We aim to compare the relative performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their combinations during interim (i) and final (f) analysis to evaluate concordance with complete response (CR) following total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in rectal cancer.
Method: Patients who opted TNT and underwent restaging with FS and MRI between 2015 and 2022 were evaluated. Concordance between the assessment methods and CR was analyzed using the weighted-κ test.
Results: A cohort comprising 208 patients revealed CR rate of 42.3 %. When evaluating individual methods, fFS alone demonstrated the most heightened sensitivity (68.2 %) for CR detection, with a moderate level of concordance (κ = 0.46). Only the combinations of iFS-fFS and fFS-fMRI reached a comparable level of concordance to that achievable by fFS alone.
Conclusion: Among the available diagnostic tools, the combination of final MRI and FS still appears to offer the highest concordance with CR, with relatively higher sensitivity. Additionally, interim MRI may not add significant clinical value and could be omitted.
{"title":"The role of combining interim and final analysis by using endoscopic and radiologic methods in total neoadjuvant treatment.","authors":"Kamil Erozkan, David Liska, Ayda Oktem, Ali Alipouriani, Lukas Schabl, Michael A Valente, Jacob A Miller, Andrei S Purysko, Scott R Steele, Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to compare the relative performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their combinations during interim (i) and final (f) analysis to evaluate concordance with complete response (CR) following total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients who opted TNT and underwent restaging with FS and MRI between 2015 and 2022 were evaluated. Concordance between the assessment methods and CR was analyzed using the weighted-κ test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort comprising 208 patients revealed CR rate of 42.3 %. When evaluating individual methods, fFS alone demonstrated the most heightened sensitivity (68.2 %) for CR detection, with a moderate level of concordance (κ = 0.46). Only the combinations of iFS-fFS and fFS-fMRI reached a comparable level of concordance to that achievable by fFS alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the available diagnostic tools, the combination of final MRI and FS still appears to offer the highest concordance with CR, with relatively higher sensitivity. Additionally, interim MRI may not add significant clinical value and could be omitted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"116104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116105
Shai Stewart, Wendelyn Oslock, Lamario Williams, Nikhil R Shah, Benedict C Nwomeh
{"title":"Roses & Thorns of academic surgery: The journey of Dr. Benedict Nwomeh.","authors":"Shai Stewart, Wendelyn Oslock, Lamario Williams, Nikhil R Shah, Benedict C Nwomeh","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"244 ","pages":"116105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116102
Herbert Chen
{"title":"From the Editor - In - Chief: Association of Women Surgeons.","authors":"Herbert Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116102","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116101
Sasha A Still
{"title":"If you throw enough mud, eventually some will stick.","authors":"Sasha A Still","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116101","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099
Lorena Garcia, Frances Dygean, Emily Bortree, Ryan Seifi, Brian Yu, Julie Ferris, Austin Reifel, Christina Snyder, Patrick Choi, Kathryn Chen
Background: In 2021, European radiology and gastrointestinal societies updated their guidelines regarding the management of gallbladder polyps (GBP). In 2022, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) also released their guidelines. We compared the two sets to determine the differences in management and outcomes for GBPs.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2023 of 118 patients referred for GBPs. Radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient ultrasounds (US) and assigned an SRU category. We applied both sets of guidelines to identify next recommended step and performed a cost analysis.
Results: When applying European versus SRU guidelines, 52.5 % (n = 62) versus 16.9 % (n = 20) would have undergone immediate surgery (p < 0.0001). US would have been considered a reasonable next step in 28.8 % (n = 34) vs 42.4 % (n = 50) (p = 0.03). Adherence to SRU guidelines would have resulted in $1837 less spent per person (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our findings found that adherence to SRU guidelines leads to less surgeries and follow up compared to European guidelines without causing harm. Further studies should be done to validate these findings and support standardized reporting of GBP.
{"title":"A comparison of society guidelines in the management of gallbladder polyps.","authors":"Lorena Garcia, Frances Dygean, Emily Bortree, Ryan Seifi, Brian Yu, Julie Ferris, Austin Reifel, Christina Snyder, Patrick Choi, Kathryn Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, European radiology and gastrointestinal societies updated their guidelines regarding the management of gallbladder polyps (GBP). In 2022, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) also released their guidelines. We compared the two sets to determine the differences in management and outcomes for GBPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2023 of 118 patients referred for GBPs. Radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient ultrasounds (US) and assigned an SRU category. We applied both sets of guidelines to identify next recommended step and performed a cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applying European versus SRU guidelines, 52.5 % (n = 62) versus 16.9 % (n = 20) would have undergone immediate surgery (p < 0.0001). US would have been considered a reasonable next step in 28.8 % (n = 34) vs 42.4 % (n = 50) (p = 0.03). Adherence to SRU guidelines would have resulted in $1837 less spent per person (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings found that adherence to SRU guidelines leads to less surgeries and follow up compared to European guidelines without causing harm. Further studies should be done to validate these findings and support standardized reporting of GBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142685805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116086
Sophia Dittrich , Madeline Ebert , Grace Elizabeth Lawson , Kimberly M. Ramonell , Sophie Dream
Introduction
Previous reviews have examined female residents' experiences while ante- and postpartum. However, to our knowledge, no review exists that synthesizes medical students’ perception of family planning during surgical residencies. We wanted to synthesize current literature on the perceptions of family planning of medical students interested in surgical fields and current medical school policies or resources related to family planning.
Methods
A scoping review was performed of databases including MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, and PubMed in April and September of 2023. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the US, occurred before 2003, were opinions, reviews, or editorials, included only non-surgical specialties, focused on only attending years or training years after medical school, and only mentioned “work/life balance” or “lifestyle.”
Results
2295 studies were identified, and a final 19 studies were included. Four major themes were identified among the studies, including family planning as a barrier to a career in surgery, fertility, onsite childcare, and parental leave. Most studies examined general barriers medical students perceive about surgery and included at least one survey question related to family planning. Only two studies focused solely on medical students’ knowledge of oocyte preservation, one on on-site childcare at medical schools and one on parental leave during medical school.
Conclusion
There is a lack of research examining medical students’ knowledge of family planning during a surgical residency and current childbearing policies and resources offered during residency.
{"title":"Family planning impact on medical students’ surgery interest and current policies in the United States: A scoping review","authors":"Sophia Dittrich , Madeline Ebert , Grace Elizabeth Lawson , Kimberly M. Ramonell , Sophie Dream","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116086","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116086","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Previous reviews have examined female residents' experiences while ante- and postpartum. However, to our knowledge, no review exists that synthesizes medical students’ perception of family planning during surgical residencies. We wanted to synthesize current literature on the perceptions of family planning of medical students interested in surgical fields and current medical school policies or resources related to family planning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was performed of databases including MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, and PubMed in April and September of 2023. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the US, occurred before 2003, were opinions, reviews, or editorials, included only non-surgical specialties, focused on only attending years or training years after medical school, and only mentioned “work/life balance” or “lifestyle.”</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2295 studies were identified, and a final 19 studies were included. Four major themes were identified among the studies, including family planning as a barrier to a career in surgery, fertility, onsite childcare, and parental leave. Most studies examined general barriers medical students perceive about surgery and included at least one survey question related to family planning. Only two studies focused solely on medical students’ knowledge of oocyte preservation, one on on-site childcare at medical schools and one on parental leave during medical school.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a lack of research examining medical students’ knowledge of family planning during a surgical residency and current childbearing policies and resources offered during residency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142646766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116088
Aradhya Nigam, Grace C Bloomfield, Maryam Boumezrag, Salima Mansoor Ali, DongHyang Kwon, Reena C Jha, Thomas M Fishbein, Pejman Radkani, Emily R Winslow
Introduction: The diagnosis of choledochal cysts in the adult population is complicated by the expected physiologic dilation of the common bile duct after cholecystectomy. We aimed to compare patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection based on cholecystectomy status.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection between 1/1/1998-12/31/2021. Patients were categorized based on whether they had undergone cholecystectomy prior to choledochal cyst diagnosis. Preoperative imaging characteristics, pathology findings, and outcomes were evaluated.
Results: Amongst 119 patients who underwent excision, 58 (46 %) had and 69 (54 %) had not undergone prior cholecystectomy. Preoperative imaging demonstrated no difference in biliary tract diameter although a greater proportion of patients with a gallbladder in place had an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (55 % v 33 %, p < 0.05). Biliary malignancy was observed in a greater proportion of patients with prior cholecystectomy although this was not statistically significant (5 % v 3 %; p = 0.9). Rates of post-operative complications were statistically similar between patient cohorts.
Discussion: Radiographic and clinical features were similar among patients who had and had not undergone cholecystectomy. Choledochal cyst patients should be managed uniformly regardless of cholecystectomy status.
{"title":"Impact of prior cholecystectomy on diagnosis and outcomes of choledochal cyst resection in adults.","authors":"Aradhya Nigam, Grace C Bloomfield, Maryam Boumezrag, Salima Mansoor Ali, DongHyang Kwon, Reena C Jha, Thomas M Fishbein, Pejman Radkani, Emily R Winslow","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of choledochal cysts in the adult population is complicated by the expected physiologic dilation of the common bile duct after cholecystectomy. We aimed to compare patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection based on cholecystectomy status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection between 1/1/1998-12/31/2021. Patients were categorized based on whether they had undergone cholecystectomy prior to choledochal cyst diagnosis. Preoperative imaging characteristics, pathology findings, and outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 119 patients who underwent excision, 58 (46 %) had and 69 (54 %) had not undergone prior cholecystectomy. Preoperative imaging demonstrated no difference in biliary tract diameter although a greater proportion of patients with a gallbladder in place had an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (55 % v 33 %, p < 0.05). Biliary malignancy was observed in a greater proportion of patients with prior cholecystectomy although this was not statistically significant (5 % v 3 %; p = 0.9). Rates of post-operative complications were statistically similar between patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Radiographic and clinical features were similar among patients who had and had not undergone cholecystectomy. Choledochal cyst patients should be managed uniformly regardless of cholecystectomy status.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116087
Irim Salik , Sima Vazquez , Nisha Palla , Norbert Smietalo , Richard Wang , Monica Vavilala , Jose F. Dominguez , Iwan Sofjan , Jared M. Pisapia
Background
Cardiac arrest (CA) in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is associated with morbidity. Our objective is to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for CA following pTBI.
Methods
The Kid Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for patients with pTBI. Patients who experienced CA were identified. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital course, and complications were compared between patients who developed CA and who did not. Risk factors for CA were explored using multivariate analysis.
Results
CA patients were more likely to have hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and heart defects (p < 0.01). CA was more likely in patients with subdural bleeding, cerebral edema, herniation, coma, or mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). CA patients had higher odds of vasopressor and transfusions, tracheostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (p < 0.001), and mortality (p < 0.01). Mechanical ventilation, cerebral edema, heart, vasopressor use, and transfusions were associated with CA on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Risk factors for CA in pTBI patients include severity of injury and underlying cardiovascular abnormalities. CA was associated with morbidity and resource utilization in pTBI patients.
背景:小儿创伤性脑损伤(pTBI)中的心脏骤停(CA)与发病率有关。我们的目的是调查 pTBI 后心脏骤停的发生率、风险因素和结果:方法:对儿童住院患者数据库(KID)中的 pTBI 患者进行查询。方法:对儿童住院患者数据库(KID)中的 pTBI 患者进行查询,确定了发生 CA 的患者。比较了发生CA和未发生CA的患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、住院过程和并发症。通过多变量分析探讨了CA的风险因素:结果:CA 患者更有可能患有高血压、肥厚型心肌病和心脏缺陷(p 结论:CA 患者更有可能患有高血压、肥厚型心肌病和心脏缺陷:创伤后应激障碍患者发生 CA 的风险因素包括损伤的严重程度和潜在的心血管异常。CA与创伤性脑损伤患者的发病率和资源利用率有关。
{"title":"Risk factors and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients","authors":"Irim Salik , Sima Vazquez , Nisha Palla , Norbert Smietalo , Richard Wang , Monica Vavilala , Jose F. Dominguez , Iwan Sofjan , Jared M. Pisapia","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116087","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116087","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac arrest (CA) in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is associated with morbidity. Our objective is to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for CA following pTBI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Kid Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for patients with pTBI. Patients who experienced CA were identified. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital course, and complications were compared between patients who developed CA and who did not. Risk factors for CA were explored using multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CA patients were more likely to have hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and heart defects (p < 0.01). CA was more likely in patients with subdural bleeding, cerebral edema, herniation, coma, or mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). CA patients had higher odds of vasopressor and transfusions, tracheostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (p < 0.001), and mortality (p < 0.01). Mechanical ventilation, cerebral edema, heart, vasopressor use, and transfusions were associated with CA on multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Risk factors for CA in pTBI patients include severity of injury and underlying cardiovascular abnormalities. CA was associated with morbidity and resource utilization in pTBI patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142643257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084
Lior Orbach, Shiran Gabay, Tal Montekio, Ariel S Chai, Yehuda Kariv, Meir Zemel, Adam Abu-Abeid, Guy Lahat, Jonathan B Yuval
Objective: The optimal level of resident autonomy in emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study assessed perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy with end stoma based on the presence of an attending surgeon.
Participants: A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, including 360 patients who underwent emergency colectomy with end stoma between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, including mortality.
Results: Of the 360 patients, 36 (10 %) had surgery without an attending surgeon present. Baseline characteristics such as age (p = 0.34), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.313), and sex (p = 0.598) were similar across groups. Perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3, p = 0.176), 90-day complication rate (p = 0.698), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.389). Malignancy-related cases also did not differ in lymph node yield (p = 0.685) or overall survival (log-rank p = 0.574).
Conclusion: In this study, Hartmann resections performed by resident teams were not associated with worse perioperative or oncologic outcomes, suggesting that resident autonomy can be safely increased without compromising patient safety.
{"title":"Comparison of perioperative outcomes of emergency hartmann resections performed by residents versus attending surgeons.","authors":"Lior Orbach, Shiran Gabay, Tal Montekio, Ariel S Chai, Yehuda Kariv, Meir Zemel, Adam Abu-Abeid, Guy Lahat, Jonathan B Yuval","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal level of resident autonomy in emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study assessed perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy with end stoma based on the presence of an attending surgeon.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, including 360 patients who underwent emergency colectomy with end stoma between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, including mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 360 patients, 36 (10 %) had surgery without an attending surgeon present. Baseline characteristics such as age (p = 0.34), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.313), and sex (p = 0.598) were similar across groups. Perioperative outcomes showed no significant differences in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3, p = 0.176), 90-day complication rate (p = 0.698), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.389). Malignancy-related cases also did not differ in lymph node yield (p = 0.685) or overall survival (log-rank p = 0.574).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, Hartmann resections performed by resident teams were not associated with worse perioperative or oncologic outcomes, suggesting that resident autonomy can be safely increased without compromising patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116085
Grace Keegan , John-Ross Rizzo , Megan A. Morris , Kathie-Ann Joseph
Background
Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).
Objectives
We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.
Methods
We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.
Results
Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.
Conclusions
These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.
{"title":"The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision","authors":"Grace Keegan , John-Ross Rizzo , Megan A. Morris , Kathie-Ann Joseph","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116085","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116085","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142646767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}