首页 > 最新文献

American journal of surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Confronting inequality: The Stark disparity of female representation in surgical oncology journals’ editorial boards 面对不平等:外科肿瘤学期刊编辑委员会中女性代表的明显差异
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116749
Brenda Feres , Sofia Wagemaker Viana , Gabriele Eckerdt Lech , Yasmin Biscola Da Cruz , Mecker G. Möller

Background

Inequitable representation on journal editorial boards (EB) may hinder females' career advancement in leadership positions.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing gender representation in EB of surgical oncology journals. Members were classified as “editor-in-chief”, “senior editorial leadership”, “board and advisory members”, and “editorial management and support”, with first names used to predict female representation.

Results

We included 24 surgical oncology journals and analyzed 2097 names. Females held 33.1 ​% (694/2097) of EB positions (p ​< ​0.001). A chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference in gender representation across editorial roles (p ​< ​0.001). Females held fewer editor-in-chief roles (17.9 ​%, 5/28) compared to board and advisory members (30.1 ​%, 473/1574). Overall, 4/24 journals had a statement about diversity/equity on the EB, despite none showing equal proportion.

Conclusion

Female surgeons remain underrepresented in leadership positions, underscoring the need to improve equity and females’ advancement.
期刊编辑委员会的公平代表权可能会阻碍女性在领导职位上的职业发展。方法采用横断面研究方法,分析外科肿瘤学期刊EB的性别代表性。成员被分为“主编”、“高级编辑领导”、“董事会和顾问成员”以及“编辑管理和支持”,并使用名字来预测女性代表。结果纳入24种外科肿瘤学期刊,分析2097个名称。女性占33.1%(694/2097)的EB职位(p < 0.001)。卡方分析揭示了编辑角色中性别代表性的显著差异(p < 0.001)。与董事会和顾问成员(30.1%,473/1574)相比,女性担任主编的比例(17.9%,5/28)更少。总体而言,4/24的期刊在EB上有关于多样性/公平性的声明,尽管没有一个显示出相同的比例。结论女性外科医生在领导岗位上的比例仍然不足,需要提高性别平等和女性地位。
{"title":"Confronting inequality: The Stark disparity of female representation in surgical oncology journals’ editorial boards","authors":"Brenda Feres ,&nbsp;Sofia Wagemaker Viana ,&nbsp;Gabriele Eckerdt Lech ,&nbsp;Yasmin Biscola Da Cruz ,&nbsp;Mecker G. Möller","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116749","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inequitable representation on journal editorial boards (EB) may hinder females' career advancement in leadership positions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing gender representation in EB of surgical oncology journals. Members were classified as “editor-in-chief”, “senior editorial leadership”, “board and advisory members”, and “editorial management and support”, with first names used to predict female representation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 24 surgical oncology journals and analyzed 2097 names. Females held 33.1 ​% (694/2097) of EB positions (p ​&lt; ​0.001). A chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference in gender representation across editorial roles (p ​&lt; ​0.001). Females held fewer editor-in-chief roles (17.9 ​%, 5/28) compared to board and advisory members (30.1 ​%, 473/1574). Overall, 4/24 journals had a statement about diversity/equity on the EB, despite none showing equal proportion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Female surgeons remain underrepresented in leadership positions, underscoring the need to improve equity and females’ advancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthcare facility volume and evidence-based practice implementation in surgical care of patients with common cancers 医疗机构的数量和循证实践的实施在外科护理的常见癌症患者
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116733
Kelsey B. Montgomery , Nicole Rademacher , Joshua S. Richman , Smita Bhatia , Kristy K. Broman

Background

Implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) can serve as an indicator of quality for common cancers. This study evaluated the impact of hospital volume on EBP implementation for common cancers.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent curative-intent treatment for breast, colon, melanoma, and thyroid cancer from 2010 to 2020 used data from the National Cancer Database. Eight EBP measures, two per disease site, were evaluated across facility volume quartiles using mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.

Results

There were 2,893,655 patients (breast n ​= ​1,731,433, colon n ​= ​481,858, melanoma.
n ​= ​418,841, thyroid n ​= ​261,523) (median age 63). EBP implementation was higher at the highest-volume sites compared to lowest (range by measure: 71 ​%–95 ​% and 60 ​%–90 ​% respectively). The adjusted odds of receiving EBP was greater at higher-volume facilities for six of eight measures.

Conclusion

Volume-associations in EBP implementation may influence system-level decision making around care allocation for common cancers.
背景:循证实践(ebp)的实施可以作为普通癌症质量的一个指标。本研究评估了医院容积对常见癌症实施EBP的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2010年至2020年间接受乳腺癌、结肠癌、黑色素瘤和甲状腺癌治疗的成年人,数据来自美国国家癌症数据库。采用混合效应logistic回归模型对患者和设施特征进行调整,评估了八个EBP测量值,每个疾病点两个。结果2893655例(乳腺1731433例,结肠481858例,黑色素瘤);N = 418,841,甲状腺N = 261,523)(中位年龄63)。EBP的实施在容量最大的地方比在容量最小的地方要高(测量范围:分别为71% - 95%和60% - 90%)。在8项措施中的6项中,在容量较大的设施中接受EBP的调整几率更高。结论:EBP实施中的体积关联可能影响系统层面的决策,围绕常见癌症的护理分配。
{"title":"Healthcare facility volume and evidence-based practice implementation in surgical care of patients with common cancers","authors":"Kelsey B. Montgomery ,&nbsp;Nicole Rademacher ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Richman ,&nbsp;Smita Bhatia ,&nbsp;Kristy K. Broman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116733","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116733","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) can serve as an indicator of quality for common cancers. This study evaluated the impact of hospital volume on EBP implementation for common cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent curative-intent treatment for breast, colon, melanoma, and thyroid cancer from 2010 to 2020 used data from the National Cancer Database. Eight EBP measures, two per disease site, were evaluated across facility volume quartiles using mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 2,893,655 patients (breast n ​= ​1,731,433, colon n ​= ​481,858, melanoma.</div><div>n ​= ​418,841, thyroid n ​= ​261,523) (median age 63). EBP implementation was higher at the highest-volume sites compared to lowest (range by measure: 71 ​%–95 ​% and 60 ​%–90 ​% respectively). The adjusted odds of receiving EBP was greater at higher-volume facilities for six of eight measures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Volume-associations in EBP implementation may influence system-level decision making around care allocation for common cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145616367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping pathways to professional support: The role of mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship in surgical careers. 绘制通往专业支持的路径:指导、指导和赞助在外科职业生涯中的作用。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116711
Isabella Faria, Camila R Guetter, Morgan Hopp, Rachna Sridhar, Chantal Reyna, Charlotte Kvasnovsky, Yangyang Ru Yu, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Catherine H Davis

Background: Mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship are critical for professional advancement in surgical careers. This study examines these different forms of support among surgeons and trainees.

Methods: An electronic survey was developed and disseminated on social media and was hosted by the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS). Members and non-members of the AWS from diverse backgrounds, including trainees and students and those in academic and community practices were queried on various demographic and professional characteristics. The primary outcome of interest was access to mentorship, sponsorship and coaching. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression models were applied to analyze survey responses.

Results: Of 93 respondents, 48 ​% reported knowing the difference between mentors, coaches, and sponsors. 65 ​% of participants reported having a mentor, 28 ​% a sponsor, and 17 ​% a coach. Community-based surgeons were less likely to have mentors compared to academic surgeons (OR 0.09, 95 ​% CI 0.01-0.69, p ​= ​0.02). Administrative leaders were more likely to have sponsors (admin leaders 44.8 ​% vs. non admin 21.3 ​%, p ​= ​0.02) and coaches (admin leaders 31 ​% vs. non admin 11.5 ​%, p ​= ​0.02). Identifying people within one's organization and time constraints were the most common barriers to having that support.

Conclusions: Efforts by institutions and surgical societies are needed to increase the availability of mentors, sponsors and coaches, particularly for community-based and early-career surgeons.

背景:指导、指导和赞助是外科职业发展的关键。本研究考察了外科医生和实习生之间这些不同形式的支持。方法:由女性外科医生协会(AWS)主办的电子调查在社交媒体上进行了开发和传播。来自不同背景的AWS会员和非会员,包括学员和学生以及从事学术和社区实践的人员,被问及各种人口和专业特征。兴趣的主要结果是获得指导、赞助和指导。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归模型对调查结果进行分析。结果:在93名受访者中,48%的人表示知道导师、教练和赞助商之间的区别。65%的参与者报告有导师,28%的人有赞助商,17%的人有教练。社区外科医生比学术外科医生更不可能有导师(OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.69, p = 0.02)。行政领导更有可能有赞助者(行政领导44.8%,非行政领导21.3%,p = 0.02)和教练(行政领导31%,非行政领导11.5%,p = 0.02)。确定组织内的人员和时间限制是获得这种支持的最常见障碍。结论:机构和外科学会需要努力增加导师、赞助者和教练的可用性,特别是对社区和早期职业外科医生。
{"title":"Mapping pathways to professional support: The role of mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship in surgical careers.","authors":"Isabella Faria, Camila R Guetter, Morgan Hopp, Rachna Sridhar, Chantal Reyna, Charlotte Kvasnovsky, Yangyang Ru Yu, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Catherine H Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentorship, coaching, and sponsorship are critical for professional advancement in surgical careers. This study examines these different forms of support among surgeons and trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was developed and disseminated on social media and was hosted by the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS). Members and non-members of the AWS from diverse backgrounds, including trainees and students and those in academic and community practices were queried on various demographic and professional characteristics. The primary outcome of interest was access to mentorship, sponsorship and coaching. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression models were applied to analyze survey responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 93 respondents, 48 ​% reported knowing the difference between mentors, coaches, and sponsors. 65 ​% of participants reported having a mentor, 28 ​% a sponsor, and 17 ​% a coach. Community-based surgeons were less likely to have mentors compared to academic surgeons (OR 0.09, 95 ​% CI 0.01-0.69, p ​= ​0.02). Administrative leaders were more likely to have sponsors (admin leaders 44.8 ​% vs. non admin 21.3 ​%, p ​= ​0.02) and coaches (admin leaders 31 ​% vs. non admin 11.5 ​%, p ​= ​0.02). Identifying people within one's organization and time constraints were the most common barriers to having that support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts by institutions and surgical societies are needed to increase the availability of mentors, sponsors and coaches, particularly for community-based and early-career surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145666792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The hidden reason many women are leaving surgery: They're being pushed out. 许多女性放弃手术的隐藏原因是:她们被排挤了。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116739
Cornelia L Griggs, Andrea L Merrill
{"title":"The hidden reason many women are leaving surgery: They're being pushed out.","authors":"Cornelia L Griggs, Andrea L Merrill","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116739","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the performance of the updated 2021 Field Triage Guidelines with the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) metric 评估更新的2021年现场分诊指南与创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标的绩效。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116729
Tyler J. Johnston , Dina M. Filiberto , Peter B. DePhillips , Chandler E. Morel , Peter E. Fischer , Andy J. Kerwin , Emily K. Lenart , Saskya E. Byerly

Background

Pre-hospital triage is critical for resource-allocation and patient-outcomes. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity (SN) of updated 2021 Field Triage Guidelines (FTGs) and trauma center activation criteria (TAC) related to Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI).

Methods

Data were collected to identify FTGs Red Criteria (RC) and Yellow Criteria (YC) and NFTI: pRBC within 4 ​h, operating room within 90 ​min, interventional radiology, ICU length-of-stay ≥3 days, mechanical ventilation within 3 days, or death within 60 ​h. SN was analyzed for RC and TAC. Lastly, logistic regressions assessed covariates associated with under-triage (UT).

Results

319 patients were included. SN of RC and TAC were 79 ​% and 77 ​%, respectively. Regression analysis showed UT by RC and TAC was associated with blunt mechanism.

Conclusions

FTGs did not meet ACS goals of ≤5 ​% UT and ≤35 ​% OT with blunt mechanism being associated with UT.
院前分诊对资源分配和患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在评估更新的2021年现场分诊指南(FTGs)和与创伤干预需求(NFTI)相关的创伤中心激活标准(TAC)的敏感性(SN)。方法:收集资料,确定FTGs红色标准(RC)和黄色标准(YC), NFTI: 4 h内pRBC, 90 min内手术室,介入放射学,ICU住院时间≥3天,3天内机械通气,或60 h内死亡。对RC和TAC进行SN分析。最后,逻辑回归评估了与分类不足(UT)相关的协变量。结果:共纳入319例患者。RC和TAC的SN分别为79%和77%。回归分析显示,经RC和TAC处理的UT与钝性机制相关。结论:FTGs未达到ACS的目标,UT≤5%和OT≤35%,钝性机制与UT相关。
{"title":"Assessing the performance of the updated 2021 Field Triage Guidelines with the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) metric","authors":"Tyler J. Johnston ,&nbsp;Dina M. Filiberto ,&nbsp;Peter B. DePhillips ,&nbsp;Chandler E. Morel ,&nbsp;Peter E. Fischer ,&nbsp;Andy J. Kerwin ,&nbsp;Emily K. Lenart ,&nbsp;Saskya E. Byerly","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116729","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116729","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pre-hospital triage is critical for resource-allocation and patient-outcomes. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity (SN) of updated 2021 Field Triage Guidelines (FTGs) and trauma center activation criteria (TAC) related to Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected to identify FTGs Red Criteria (RC) and Yellow Criteria (YC) and NFTI: pRBC within 4 ​h, operating room within 90 ​min, interventional radiology, ICU length-of-stay ≥3 days, mechanical ventilation within 3 days, or death within 60 ​h. SN was analyzed for RC and TAC. Lastly, logistic regressions assessed covariates associated with under-triage (UT).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>319 patients were included. SN of RC and TAC were 79 ​% and 77 ​%, respectively. Regression analysis showed UT by RC and TAC was associated with blunt mechanism.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FTGs did not meet ACS goals of ≤5 ​% UT and ≤35 ​% OT with blunt mechanism being associated with UT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145659833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategies to minimize postoperative complications in microsurgical free tissue transfer: The role of anticoagulation, antiplatelets, and ambulation 减少显微外科游离组织移植术后并发症的策略:抗凝、抗血小板和移动的作用
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116730
Erika T. Shock, Brooke E. Porter, Farrell K. Landwehr, Angela V. Atkinson, Natalie S. Raatz, Kevin M. Klifto, Thomas D. Willson

Objective

Microsurgical free tissue transfer (FTT) is essential in reconstructive surgery, but thromboembolic events are a leading cause of flap failure. This study evaluates how perioperative anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and ambulation affect postoperative complications in FTT.

Study design

A retrospective cohort study of 497 free flap procedures assessed associations between antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, ambulation timing, and postoperative outcomes. The cohort included pediatric and adult patients who underwent a free tissue transfer from 2012 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of flap-related complications.

Results

Controlling for age, sex, and nicotine use, ambulation on postoperative day 1 was linked to reduced arterial/venous thrombosis (OR 0.34, p ​= ​0.003) and fewer operating room takebacks (OR 0.56, p ​= ​0.006). Anticoagulation on day 6 increased takeback odds (OR 1.64, p ​= ​0.029). Antiplatelet therapy on day 7 decreased takeback odds (OR 0.65, p ​= ​0.04). Day 7 ambulation lowered odds of any complication (aOR 0.67, p ​= ​0.042).

Conclusions

Early mobilization and appropriately timed antithrombotic therapy reduce FTT complications, supporting standardized postoperative care.
目的显微外科游离组织移植(FTT)在重建手术中是必不可少的,但血栓栓塞事件是皮瓣失败的主要原因。本研究评估围手术期抗凝、抗血小板治疗和活动对FTT术后并发症的影响。研究设计一项497例游离皮瓣手术的回顾性队列研究评估了抗血小板和抗凝治疗、下床时间和术后结果之间的关系。该队列包括2012年至2021年接受免费组织移植的儿科和成人患者。多变量逻辑回归确定了皮瓣相关并发症的预测因素。结果在控制年龄、性别和尼古丁使用的情况下,术后第1天的活动与减少动脉/静脉血栓形成(OR 0.34, p = 0.003)和减少手术室回头率(OR 0.56, p = 0.006)有关。第6天抗凝治疗增加了药物收回的几率(OR 1.64, p = 0.029)。抗血小板治疗第7天降低了不良反应发生率(OR 0.65, p = 0.04)。第7天的活动降低了任何并发症的发生率(aOR 0.67, p = 0.042)。结论早期活动和适时抗栓治疗可减少FTT并发症,支持术后规范化护理。
{"title":"Strategies to minimize postoperative complications in microsurgical free tissue transfer: The role of anticoagulation, antiplatelets, and ambulation","authors":"Erika T. Shock,&nbsp;Brooke E. Porter,&nbsp;Farrell K. Landwehr,&nbsp;Angela V. Atkinson,&nbsp;Natalie S. Raatz,&nbsp;Kevin M. Klifto,&nbsp;Thomas D. Willson","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116730","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116730","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Microsurgical free tissue transfer (FTT) is essential in reconstructive surgery, but thromboembolic events are a leading cause of flap failure. This study evaluates how perioperative anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and ambulation affect postoperative complications in FTT.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of 497 free flap procedures assessed associations between antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, ambulation timing, and postoperative outcomes. The cohort included pediatric and adult patients who underwent a free tissue transfer from 2012 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of flap-related complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Controlling for age, sex, and nicotine use, ambulation on postoperative day 1 was linked to reduced arterial/venous thrombosis (OR 0.34, p ​= ​0.003) and fewer operating room takebacks (OR 0.56, p ​= ​0.006). Anticoagulation on day 6 increased takeback odds (OR 1.64, p ​= ​0.029). Antiplatelet therapy on day 7 decreased takeback odds (OR 0.65, p ​= ​0.04). Day 7 ambulation lowered odds of any complication (aOR 0.67, p ​= ​0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early mobilization and appropriately timed antithrombotic therapy reduce FTT complications, supporting standardized postoperative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145616368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consistency of outcomes of studies on rectal cancer from the NCDB and SEER databases: A systematic review NCDB和SEER数据库中直肠癌研究结果的一致性:一项系统综述。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116728
Justin Dourado , Matthew Bilotti , Sameh Hany Emile , Anjelli Wignakumar , Cameron Perrone , Spencer Barnes , Nir Horesh , Steven D. Wexner

Introduction

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program are major national cancer databases. While widely used, it is unclear if studies from each yield consistent conclusions on similar questions. This study compared findings from NCDB and SEER studies on rectal adenocarcinoma care to assess concordance.

Methods

This PRISMA-compliant systematic review included studies evaluating rectal adenocarcinoma care using NCDB or SEER data. The main outcome was concordance or discordance between studies with overlapping topics.

Results

Of 310 screened studies, 30 addressed overlapping questions, with nine areas of overlap, and major disagreements in four. SEER studies showed a survival benefit of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) in mucinous adenocarcinoma, unlike NCDB studies. Other differences involved adjuvant therapy for stage T3N0 and stage II disease, and lymph node yield cutoffs.

Conclusion

Most NCDB and SEER study conclusions were consistent, with discrepancies limited to controversial areas.
国家癌症数据库(NCDB)和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划是主要的国家癌症数据库。虽然被广泛使用,但目前尚不清楚两项研究是否在类似问题上得出一致的结论。本研究比较了NCDB和SEER对直肠腺癌护理的研究结果,以评估一致性。方法:这项符合prisma标准的系统综述纳入了使用NCDB或SEER数据评估直肠腺癌治疗的研究。主要结果是有重叠主题的研究之间的一致性或不一致性。结果:在310项筛选研究中,30项涉及重叠问题,9个领域重叠,4个领域存在重大分歧。与NCDB研究不同,SEER研究显示新辅助放射治疗(NRT)在粘液腺癌中的生存获益。其他差异包括T3N0期和II期疾病的辅助治疗,以及淋巴结产量截止。结论:大多数NCDB和SEER研究结论是一致的,差异仅限于有争议的领域。
{"title":"Consistency of outcomes of studies on rectal cancer from the NCDB and SEER databases: A systematic review","authors":"Justin Dourado ,&nbsp;Matthew Bilotti ,&nbsp;Sameh Hany Emile ,&nbsp;Anjelli Wignakumar ,&nbsp;Cameron Perrone ,&nbsp;Spencer Barnes ,&nbsp;Nir Horesh ,&nbsp;Steven D. Wexner","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116728","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program are major national cancer databases. While widely used, it is unclear if studies from each yield consistent conclusions on similar questions. This study compared findings from NCDB and SEER studies on rectal adenocarcinoma care to assess concordance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This PRISMA-compliant systematic review included studies evaluating rectal adenocarcinoma care using NCDB or SEER data. The main outcome was concordance or discordance between studies with overlapping topics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 310 screened studies, 30 addressed overlapping questions, with nine areas of overlap, and major disagreements in four. SEER studies showed a survival benefit of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) in mucinous adenocarcinoma, unlike NCDB studies. Other differences involved adjuvant therapy for stage T3N0 and stage II disease, and lymph node yield cutoffs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most NCDB and SEER study conclusions were consistent, with discrepancies limited to controversial areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is anastrozole really better than tamoxifen for low-risk breast cancer? 阿那曲唑治疗低风险乳腺癌真的比他莫西芬好吗?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116734
Jennifer Den, Caroline Baughn, V. Suzanne Klimberg

Objective

In 2002, the ATAC trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) established anastrozole as the preferred adjuvant treatment over tamoxifen in postmenopausal women (disease-free survival at 89.4 ​% vs. 87.4 ​%) with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). The efficacy demonstrated in the ATAC trial led to the broader adoption of aromatase inhibitors in younger women. This practice necessitates using GnRH agonists or ovarian ablation to induce menopause, which causes significant side effects such as bone deterioration. Our study aimed to compare local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) between anastrozole and tamoxifen for low Oncotype Recurrence Scores (RS). We hypothesize that there is little to no difference in LR and OS between the two medications in both pre- and postmenopausal women.

Methods

The TriNetX database was used to create retrospective cohort studies based on low (0–17) Oncotype RS. We conducted two studies comparing women <50 or >50 years old who were treated with either anastrozole or tamoxifen. All studies excluded Stage 4 or T4 tumors and had propensity scores matched by age, tumor stage, tumor size (T), and nodal status (N). Outcomes of interest were 10-year OS and LR.

Results

For patients aged >50, there were 1734 patients on anastrozole and 682 on tamoxifen, with 582 patients per cohort after matching. Within 10 years, 10 or fewer patients died, with no statistically significant difference in 10-year OS (KM analysis: 98 ​% vs. 97 ​%, p ​= ​0.6). LR was 7.2 ​% in the anastrozole group and 7.6 ​% in the tamoxifen group, with no statistically significant difference (HR 1, 95 ​% CI, 0.69–1.65).
For patients aged <50, 94 received anastrozole and 270 received tamoxifen, with 82 matched patients included in the analysis. Within 10 years, no patients died, and 10 or fewer experienced LR. There was no significant difference in both 10-year OS (KM analysis: 100 ​% vs. 100 ​%, p ​= ​1) and LR (12 ​% vs. 12 ​%, HR 2, 95 ​% CI, 0.59–6.56).

Conclusions

In both pre- and postmenopausal women, there is no difference in 10-year OS or LR between anastrozole and tamoxifen for BC patients with low Oncotype RS. We conclude that Stage 1–3, T1-T3 pre- and postmenopausal BC patients with Oncotype RS between 0 and 17 can safely choose either medication. This finding is of particular importance for premenopausal women who wish to avoid the adverse side effects of medically induced menopause and bone deterioration associated with the anastrozole and ovarian suppression approach.
目的2002年,ATAC试验(Arimidex,他莫昔芬,单独或联合)确定阿那曲唑是激素受体阳性乳腺癌(BC)绝经后妇女(无病生存率分别为89.4%和87.4%)的首选辅助治疗,而不是他莫昔芬。在ATAC试验中显示的疗效导致芳香酶抑制剂在年轻女性中的广泛应用。这种做法需要使用GnRH激动剂或卵巢消融术来诱导绝经,这会导致严重的副作用,如骨质恶化。我们的研究旨在比较阿那曲唑和他莫昔芬对低肿瘤复发评分(RS)的局部复发(LR)和总生存(OS)。我们假设两种药物对绝经前和绝经后妇女的LR和OS几乎没有差异。方法利用TriNetX数据库建立基于低(0-17)癌型RS的回顾性队列研究。我们进行了两项研究,比较了50岁和50岁的女性接受阿那曲唑或他莫昔芬治疗。所有的研究都排除了4期或T4期肿瘤,并且倾向评分与年龄、肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小(T)和淋巴结状态(N)相匹配。感兴趣的结果是10年OS和LR。结果50岁患者中,阿那曲唑组1734例,他莫昔芬组682例,配对后每组582例。10年内,10例或更少患者死亡,10年OS无统计学差异(KM分析:98% vs 97%, p = 0.6)。阿那曲唑组LR为7.2%,他莫昔芬组为7.6%,差异无统计学意义(HR 1, 95% CI, 0.69-1.65)。对于50岁的患者,94例接受阿那曲唑治疗,270例接受他莫昔芬治疗,其中82例匹配患者纳入分析。在10年内,没有患者死亡,10例或更少的患者经历了LR。10年OS (KM分析:100% vs 100%, p = 1)和LR (12% vs 12%, HR 2, 95% CI, 0.59-6.56)均无显著差异。结论在绝经前和绝经后女性中,阿那曲唑和他莫昔芬对于低RS Oncotype的BC患者的10年OS和LR没有差异,我们认为1-3期、T1-T3期绝经前和绝经后RS Oncotype在0- 17之间的BC患者可以安全地选择任何一种药物。这一发现对绝经前妇女特别重要,她们希望避免药物引起的绝经和与阿那曲唑和卵巢抑制方法相关的骨质退化的不良副作用。
{"title":"Is anastrozole really better than tamoxifen for low-risk breast cancer?","authors":"Jennifer Den,&nbsp;Caroline Baughn,&nbsp;V. Suzanne Klimberg","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116734","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116734","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In 2002, the ATAC trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) established anastrozole as the preferred adjuvant treatment over tamoxifen in postmenopausal women (disease-free survival at 89.4 ​% vs. 87.4 ​%) with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). The efficacy demonstrated in the ATAC trial led to the broader adoption of aromatase inhibitors in younger women. This practice necessitates using GnRH agonists or ovarian ablation to induce menopause, which causes significant side effects such as bone deterioration. Our study aimed to compare local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) between anastrozole and tamoxifen for low Oncotype Recurrence Scores (RS). We hypothesize that there is little to no difference in LR and OS between the two medications in both pre- and postmenopausal women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The TriNetX database was used to create retrospective cohort studies based on low (0–17) Oncotype RS. We conducted two studies comparing women &lt;50 or &gt;50 years old who were treated with either anastrozole or tamoxifen. All studies excluded Stage 4 or T4 tumors and had propensity scores matched by age, tumor stage, tumor size (T), and nodal status (N). Outcomes of interest were 10-year OS and LR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For patients aged &gt;50, there were 1734 patients on anastrozole and 682 on tamoxifen, with 582 patients per cohort after matching. Within 10 years, 10 or fewer patients died, with no statistically significant difference in 10-year OS (KM analysis: 98 ​% vs. 97 ​%, p ​= ​0.6). LR was 7.2 ​% in the anastrozole group and 7.6 ​% in the tamoxifen group, with no statistically significant difference (HR 1, 95 ​% CI, 0.69–1.65).</div><div>For patients aged &lt;50, 94 received anastrozole and 270 received tamoxifen, with 82 matched patients included in the analysis. Within 10 years, no patients died, and 10 or fewer experienced LR. There was no significant difference in both 10-year OS (KM analysis: 100 ​% vs. 100 ​%, p ​= ​1) and LR (12 ​% vs. 12 ​%, HR 2, 95 ​% CI, 0.59–6.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In both pre- and postmenopausal women, there is no difference in 10-year OS or LR between anastrozole and tamoxifen for BC patients with low Oncotype RS. We conclude that Stage 1–3, T1-T3 pre- and postmenopausal BC patients with Oncotype RS between 0 and 17 can safely choose either medication. This finding is of particular importance for premenopausal women who wish to avoid the adverse side effects of medically induced menopause and bone deterioration associated with the anastrozole and ovarian suppression approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145616370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
22-year experience with bariatric revision surgery; What have we learned? 22年的减肥手术经验;我们学到了什么?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116738
Natasha A. Sioda , Valerie L. Armstrong , Grace Madura , Marko A. Laitinen , Elisabeth S. Lim , Yu-Hui H. Chang , Kristi Harold , David Pearson , Enrique Elli , Todd Kellogg , James A. Madura

Background

The obesity epidemic has resulted in an accompanied increase in bariatric surgery volumes in the United States. The present study aims to analyze trends and indications for revision of bariatric operations.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery at a multi-site single institution from 2000 to 2022.

Results

901 patients were identified; the primary operations leading to revision was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n ​= ​413), gastric banding (n ​= ​276), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n ​= ​157), and other (N ​= ​55); with mean follow-up of 2.6 years.

Conclusions

Bariatric revisions have varied over time related to the incidence and outcomes of the most popular primary operations. SG has become the most common operation undergoing revision. Weight regain or inadequate weight loss was the most common reason for revision, with majority of patients undergoing revision to RYGB. At our institution, revision to RYGB yielded the most significant improvement in results at most recent follow up.
背景:肥胖的流行导致了美国减肥手术数量的增加。本研究旨在分析减肥手术的趋势和适应症。方法回顾性分析2000年至2022年在多地点单一机构接受改进性减肥手术的患者。结果共检出901例患者;导致翻修的主要手术为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB) (n = 413)、胃束带术(n = 276)、袖胃切除术(n = 157)和其他(n = 55);平均随访时间为2.6年。结论:随着时间的推移,与最流行的原发性手术的发生率和结果相关的手术标准也有所不同。SG已成为最常见的翻修手术。体重恢复或体重减轻不足是最常见的翻修原因,大多数患者接受了RYGB翻修。在我们机构,对RYGB的修订在最近的跟踪中产生了最显著的结果改善。
{"title":"22-year experience with bariatric revision surgery; What have we learned?","authors":"Natasha A. Sioda ,&nbsp;Valerie L. Armstrong ,&nbsp;Grace Madura ,&nbsp;Marko A. Laitinen ,&nbsp;Elisabeth S. Lim ,&nbsp;Yu-Hui H. Chang ,&nbsp;Kristi Harold ,&nbsp;David Pearson ,&nbsp;Enrique Elli ,&nbsp;Todd Kellogg ,&nbsp;James A. Madura","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The obesity epidemic has resulted in an accompanied increase in bariatric surgery volumes in the United States. The present study aims to analyze trends and indications for revision of bariatric operations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery at a multi-site single institution from 2000 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>901 patients were identified; the primary operations leading to revision was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n ​= ​413), gastric banding (n ​= ​276), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n ​= ​157), and other (N ​= ​55); with mean follow-up of 2.6 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Bariatric revisions have varied over time related to the incidence and outcomes of the most popular primary operations. SG has become the most common operation undergoing revision. Weight regain or inadequate weight loss was the most common reason for revision, with majority of patients undergoing revision to RYGB. At our institution, revision to RYGB yielded the most significant improvement in results at most recent follow up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145616364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking transfusion timing: Evaluating preoperative transfusion morbidity using a national pediatric database 重新思考输血时机:使用国家儿科数据库评估术前输血发病率
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116731
Matthew T. Parrish , Katie Bews , Stephanie F. Polites , Elizabeth B. Habermann

Background

Transfusion within 72 ​h after surgery (BT) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity in pediatric patients, but the impact of preoperative transfusion (PBT), given within 48 ​h before surgery, is unclear. We hypothesize that PBT is associated with lower morbidity than BT.

Methods

Pediatric (<18-years-old) general surgery patients who received PBT or BT were identified from the 2012–2022 NSQIP-P files, excluding those with preoperative hematocrit <21 ​%. PBT and BT patients were propensity-score matched with rates of postoperative infection (PI) and surgical site infections (SSI) compared using logistic regression.

Results

Among 15,401 patients, 4559 (30 ​%) received PBT and 10,842 (70 ​%) received BT. After matching, 3439 PBT patients were compared to 3439 BT patients. PBT was associated with fewer PI (8 ​% vs 10 ​%; OR ​= ​0.75, 95 ​% CI 0.64–0.89) and SSI (5 ​% vs 8 ​%, OR ​= ​0.72, 95 ​% CI 0.59–0.87).

Conclusions

PBT was associated with lower odds of postoperative infections compared to BT in matched pediatric general surgery patients.
背景:儿科患者术后72小时内输血与术后发病率增加有关,但术前48小时内输血的影响尚不清楚。方法从2012-2022年NSQIP-P文件中确定接受PBT或BT的儿科(18岁)普外科患者,不包括术前红细胞压积21%的患者。采用logistic回归比较PBT和BT患者的倾向评分与术后感染(PI)和手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率相匹配。结果15401例患者中,4559例(30%)接受PBT治疗,10842例(70%)接受BT治疗,配对后,PBT患者3439例,BT患者3439例。PBT与较低的PI (8% vs 10%; OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89)和SSI (5% vs 8%, OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87)相关。结论在匹配的儿童普外科患者中,与BT相比,spbt与术后感染的发生率较低相关。
{"title":"Rethinking transfusion timing: Evaluating preoperative transfusion morbidity using a national pediatric database","authors":"Matthew T. Parrish ,&nbsp;Katie Bews ,&nbsp;Stephanie F. Polites ,&nbsp;Elizabeth B. Habermann","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transfusion within 72 ​h after surgery (BT) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity in pediatric patients, but the impact of preoperative transfusion (PBT), given within 48 ​h before surgery, is unclear. We hypothesize that PBT is associated with lower morbidity than BT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pediatric (&lt;18-years-old) general surgery patients who received PBT or BT were identified from the 2012–2022 NSQIP-P files, excluding those with preoperative hematocrit &lt;21 ​%. PBT and BT patients were propensity-score matched with rates of postoperative infection (PI) and surgical site infections (SSI) compared using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 15,401 patients, 4559 (30 ​%) received PBT and 10,842 (70 ​%) received BT. After matching, 3439 PBT patients were compared to 3439 BT patients. PBT was associated with fewer PI (8 ​% vs 10 ​%; OR ​= ​0.75, 95 ​% CI 0.64–0.89) and SSI (5 ​% vs 8 ​%, OR ​= ​0.72, 95 ​% CI 0.59–0.87).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PBT was associated with lower odds of postoperative infections compared to BT in matched pediatric general surgery patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 116731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145616361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1