Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00416.x
Patrick Bolton MBBS, GradDipCompSt, PhD, EMBA, FRACGP, MRACMA
Abstract The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate a method of improving the completion of discharge summary information. As a quality assurance activity, a self-carbonating form for both the patient record and discharge letter was introduced to a general practice casualty (GPC) in Sydney, Australia, involving approximately 40 community GPs. Evaluation involved assessment of the change associated with this intervention on a cohort of GPs using logistic regression analysis, clustering at the level of the treating GP. The main outcome measure was completion of a discharge letter to the patient’s usual GP. Provision of discharge letters increased from 30% prior to the intervention to 90% following it (P < 0.0005; OR 11.9; 95% CI 8.6–16.4). It was concluded that solutions to problems of quality are best developed at the system level. The use of a self-carbonating form to simultaneously generate a discharge letter and the medical record might be used by other similar services with good effect.
摘要:本研究的目的是描述和评估一种提高出院汇总信息完成度的方法。作为一项质量保证活动,在澳大利亚悉尼的一家全科医生伤病员(GPC)中引入了患者记录和出院信的自碳化表格,涉及大约40名社区全科医生。评估包括使用逻辑回归分析对全科医生队列的干预相关的变化进行评估,聚类在治疗全科医生的水平上。主要的结果测量是完成出院信给病人通常的全科医生。出院信的提供从干预前的30%增加到干预后的90% (P <0.0005;或11.9;95% ci 8.6-16.4)。结论是质量问题的解决方案最好在系统层面上发展。使用自碳化表格同时生成出院信和病历的做法可为其他类似机构采用,效果良好。
{"title":"A quality assurance activity to improve discharge communication with general practice","authors":"Patrick Bolton MBBS, GradDipCompSt, PhD, EMBA, FRACGP, MRACMA","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00416.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00416.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate a method of improving the completion of discharge summary information. As a quality assurance activity, a self-carbonating form for both the patient record and discharge letter was introduced to a general practice casualty (GPC) in Sydney, Australia, involving approximately 40 community GPs. Evaluation involved assessment of the change associated with this intervention on a cohort of GPs using logistic regression analysis, clustering at the level of the treating GP. The main outcome measure was completion of a discharge letter to the patient’s usual GP. Provision of discharge letters increased from 30% prior to the intervention to 90% following it (<i>P</i> < 0.0005; OR 11.9; 95% CI 8.6–16.4). It was concluded that solutions to problems of quality are best developed at the system level. The use of a self-carbonating form to simultaneously generate a discharge letter and the medical record might be used by other similar services with good effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"69-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00416.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00415.x
Brian T Collopy FRACS, FRCS, FRACMA
{"title":"Commentary – Ensuring accuracy of clinical data is only part of the audit process","authors":"Brian T Collopy FRACS, FRCS, FRACMA","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00415.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00415.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"74-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00415.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00429.x
{"title":"Adverse events in the ‘medical’ ward","authors":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00429.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00429.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00429.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00405.x
Gary J Browne FRACP, FACEM, Helen Giles MNM, Mary E Mccaskill DipPaed, Bruce J Fasher MBBS FRACP, Lawrence T Lam MAppPsy, MPH
Abstract The aim of this study was to provide an evaluation of the overall effectiveness of using a number of clinical pathways in treating common acute paediatric conditions in an emergency department. This was a before and after study conducted on the effectiveness of three clinical pathways (gastroenteritis, asthma, and croup) in the emergency department of the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, conducted over two separate yearly periods January to December 1996 and January to December 1999 representing before and after the introduction of clinical pathways in the emergency department. The main outcomes of the effectiveness of the pathways, namely admission to an in-patient bed, length of hospital stay and re-presentation after discharge from the ED were compared. Other outcomes of interest such as parental satisfaction and patient waiting times were also presented. Any deviation from a key clinical pathway process was reported. A total of 2854 children were managed by a clinical pathway compared to 2680 children managed before clinical pathways were introduced. The admission rate was reduced by threefold (9.1% compared to 23.6%) with a twofold reduction in length of hospital stay (32.7 h compared to 17.5 h). In 3.6% of children using a clinical pathway an unscheduled medical visit or re-presentation to the emergency department occurred after discharge, compared to 4.9% before the use of clinical pathways. No adverse events were reported in these children. In 76 cases deviation from a clinical pathway process was reported. High parental satisfaction was reported for clinical pathways throughout the study. Clinical pathways in this emergency department allowed rapid stabilisation of children, reducing admission rate, with a shortened length of hospital stay and few patients re-presenting after discharge and were well accepted by parents.
{"title":"The benefits of using clinical pathways for managing acute paediatric illness in an emergency department","authors":"Gary J Browne FRACP, FACEM, Helen Giles MNM, Mary E Mccaskill DipPaed, Bruce J Fasher MBBS FRACP, Lawrence T Lam MAppPsy, MPH","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00405.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00405.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The aim of this study was to provide an evaluation of the overall effectiveness of using a number of clinical pathways in treating common acute paediatric conditions in an emergency department. This was a before and after study conducted on the effectiveness of three clinical pathways (gastroenteritis, asthma, and croup) in the emergency department of the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, conducted over two separate yearly periods January to December 1996 and January to December 1999 representing before and after the introduction of clinical pathways in the emergency department. The main outcomes of the effectiveness of the pathways, namely admission to an in-patient bed, length of hospital stay and re-presentation after discharge from the ED were compared. Other outcomes of interest such as parental satisfaction and patient waiting times were also presented. Any deviation from a key clinical pathway process was reported. A total of 2854 children were managed by a clinical pathway compared to 2680 children managed before clinical pathways were introduced. The admission rate was reduced by threefold (9.1% compared to 23.6%) with a twofold reduction in length of hospital stay (32.7 h compared to 17.5 h). In 3.6% of children using a clinical pathway an unscheduled medical visit or re-presentation to the emergency department occurred after discharge, compared to 4.9% before the use of clinical pathways. No adverse events were reported in these children. In 76 cases deviation from a clinical pathway process was reported. High parental satisfaction was reported for clinical pathways throughout the study. Clinical pathways in this emergency department allowed rapid stabilisation of children, reducing admission rate, with a shortened length of hospital stay and few patients re-presenting after discharge and were well accepted by parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"50-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00405.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00408.x
Carlos Cobelas MB BS, FACEM, Carolyn Cooper MB BS, FACEM, Mary Ell BMedRecord, CHRA, Graeme Hawthorne PhD, Marcus Kennedy MB BS, FACEM, Deborah Leach MB BS, FACEM
Abstract Since the introduction of the Emergency Services Enhancement Program (ESEP) in Victoria in 1995, improvements have been demonstrated in the indicators relating to Emergency waiting times, ambulance bypass rates and inpatient bed access block. This study focuses on staff perceptions of changes in these indicators, factors perceived to influence performance improvements and the extent to which ESEP is perceived to have contributed to overall patient care. A questionnaire was directed at four focus groups within each of the hospitals participating in ESEP. These were Chief Executive Officers, Emergency Department Directors and Nurse Unit Managers, bed coordinators and personnel from the Emergency Department floor. A total of 101 staff responded. Emergency Department staff were generally accurate in their perceptions of performance changes. The most important factors effecting the changes were perceived to be changes in staff profile, management of patient flow through the department, changes in administrative policies and changes in work practices. Staff perceived that patient care has improved by 10% since 1995 and that ESEP has contributed 8% of this improvement. Staff have perceived improvements in ESEP performance indicators consistent with actual changes. The possible mechanisms by which these changes have occurred are presented and discussed. Factor analysis indicated that changes perceived to be most likely to result in improvements were: changes in staff profile (seniority), managing the flow of patients through emergency departments, changing administrative policies, changes in work practices and changes in staff numbers. Improvements in patient care were considered partly due to ESEP. In addition, ESEP has raised awareness of quality management issues.
{"title":"Quality management and the Emergency Services Enhancement Program","authors":"Carlos Cobelas MB BS, FACEM, Carolyn Cooper MB BS, FACEM, Mary Ell BMedRecord, CHRA, Graeme Hawthorne PhD, Marcus Kennedy MB BS, FACEM, Deborah Leach MB BS, FACEM","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00408.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00408.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Since the introduction of the Emergency Services Enhancement Program (ESEP) in Victoria in 1995, improvements have been demonstrated in the indicators relating to Emergency waiting times, ambulance bypass rates and inpatient bed access block. This study focuses on staff perceptions of changes in these indicators, factors perceived to influence performance improvements and the extent to which ESEP is perceived to have contributed to overall patient care. A questionnaire was directed at four focus groups within each of the hospitals participating in ESEP. These were Chief Executive Officers, Emergency Department Directors and Nurse Unit Managers, bed coordinators and personnel from the Emergency Department floor. A total of 101 staff responded. Emergency Department staff were generally accurate in their perceptions of performance changes. The most important factors effecting the changes were perceived to be changes in staff profile, management of patient flow through the department, changes in administrative policies and changes in work practices. Staff perceived that patient care has improved by 10% since 1995 and that ESEP has contributed 8% of this improvement. Staff have perceived improvements in ESEP performance indicators consistent with actual changes. The possible mechanisms by which these changes have occurred are presented and discussed. Factor analysis indicated that changes perceived to be most likely to result in improvements were: changes in staff profile (seniority), managing the flow of patients through emergency departments, changing administrative policies, changes in work practices and changes in staff numbers. Improvements in patient care were considered partly due to ESEP. In addition, ESEP has raised awareness of quality management issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"80-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00408.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00410.x
Anne Duggan PhD, MHP, FRACP, Jas Bilku MBChB, FRCGP, Keith Ledger BM, BCh, Robert Scaffardi BM, BCh, Christopher J Hawkey DM, FRCP
Abstract The efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication for H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease is beyond dispute. However, little attention has been paid to how feasible it is in primary care to undertake H. pylori eradication for patients with a past history of peptic ulcer disease. Patients identified by computer search of three general practices with a documented history of peptic ulcer disease were invited to attend for H. pylori testing and eradication therapy if H. pylori positive. A total of 101 patients were identified from a combined practice size of 24 780 of whom 34 were eligible for testing. Twenty-one per cent (seven patients) declined testing, 3% (one patient) refused therapy and another 21% (seven patients) were H. pylori negative. Helicobacter pylori eradication was highly successful (95%) and had an effect on prescription and reconsultation rates at 12 months. Eradicating H. pylori in patients with a past history of peptic ulcer disease not associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ingestion is a challenging goal in general practice.
{"title":"Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with a past history of peptic ulcer: Is the juice worth the squeeze?","authors":"Anne Duggan PhD, MHP, FRACP, Jas Bilku MBChB, FRCGP, Keith Ledger BM, BCh, Robert Scaffardi BM, BCh, Christopher J Hawkey DM, FRCP","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00410.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00410.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The efficacy of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication for <i>H. pylori</i> associated duodenal ulcer disease is beyond dispute. However, little attention has been paid to how feasible it is in primary care to undertake <i>H. pylori</i> eradication for patients with a past history of peptic ulcer disease. Patients identified by computer search of three general practices with a documented history of peptic ulcer disease were invited to attend for <i>H. pylori</i> testing and eradication therapy if <i>H. pylori</i> positive. A total of 101 patients were identified from a combined practice size of 24 780 of whom 34 were eligible for testing. Twenty-one per cent (seven patients) declined testing, 3% (one patient) refused therapy and another 21% (seven patients) were <i>H. pylori</i> negative. <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication was highly successful (95%) and had an effect on prescription and reconsultation rates at 12 months. Eradicating <i>H. pylori</i> in patients with a past history of peptic ulcer disease not associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ingestion is a challenging goal in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"76-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00410.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00413.x
Miles D Witham BM BCh MRCP(UK), Peter A Kendall MBBS, FRACP
Abstract There is some evidence that physician self-reporting is an efficient and effective way of collecting data on adverse incidents in health care. This study tested a simple prospective adverse incident audit, self-reported by physicians, on a general medical unit. A total of 158 reports were collected over a 6-month period covering a wide range of quality issues, including, but not limited to, safety issues. One-third of reported incidents occurred within 48 h of hospitalization. One-half of incidents were associated with harm or inconvenience to patients. Reported incidents fell into easily classifiable groups, and the data was used as a platform for a coordinated approach to quality improvement within the department. It is concluded that this technique is an easily implementable addition to the more traditional methods used for quality improvement within general medicine.
{"title":"A prospective, physician self-reported adverse incident audit on a general medical unit","authors":"Miles D Witham BM BCh MRCP(UK), Peter A Kendall MBBS, FRACP","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00413.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00413.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> There is some evidence that physician self-reporting is an efficient and effective way of collecting data on adverse incidents in health care. This study tested a simple prospective adverse incident audit, self-reported by physicians, on a general medical unit. A total of 158 reports were collected over a 6-month period covering a wide range of quality issues, including, but not limited to, safety issues. One-third of reported incidents occurred within 48 h of hospitalization. One-half of incidents were associated with harm or inconvenience to patients. Reported incidents fell into easily classifiable groups, and the data was used as a platform for a coordinated approach to quality improvement within the department. It is concluded that this technique is an easily implementable addition to the more traditional methods used for quality improvement within general medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"61-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00413.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00411.x
Leonie B Oldmeadow GradDipPhysio, MClinEd, Helen McBurney PhD, BAppSc(Physio), Valma J Robertson PhD, BAppSc(Physio), BA(Hons)
Abstract The impact of shorter hospital lengths of stay on patient outcomes at discharge from acute care after knee arthroplasty was investigated in a prospective observational outcome study at three Melbourne public hospitals during a 5-month period from October 1999 to March 2000. The participants were 105 consecutive patients (35 at each hospital), with a mean age of 71 years. Outcome measures were length of stay, destination (home or rehabilitation) and functional mobility at discharge from the acute care facility. During the study period mean hospital length of stay across the three hospitals was 6.5 days, more than 30% less than the Victorian average for the preceding year. This was associated with high rates of discharge to rehabilitation facilities (mean 64%), with rates varying between the three hospitals (97%, 57% and 40%). However, in each hospital, one-third of this group had already achieved a level of independent functional mobility adequate for discharge home, highlighting an apparent influence of non-clinical factors on discharge decisions, including pressure to decrease length of stay, hospital policy and availability of a rehabilitation bed. Ways of achieving discharge directly home for a greater number of patients following knee arthroplasty and of determining optimal length of stay are discussed.
{"title":"Hospital stay and discharge outcomes after knee arthroplasty","authors":"Leonie B Oldmeadow GradDipPhysio, MClinEd, Helen McBurney PhD, BAppSc(Physio), Valma J Robertson PhD, BAppSc(Physio), BA(Hons)","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00411.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00411.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The impact of shorter hospital lengths of stay on patient outcomes at discharge from acute care after knee arthroplasty was investigated in a prospective observational outcome study at three Melbourne public hospitals during a 5-month period from October 1999 to March 2000. The participants were 105 consecutive patients (35 at each hospital), with a mean age of 71 years. Outcome measures were length of stay, destination (home or rehabilitation) and functional mobility at discharge from the acute care facility. During the study period mean hospital length of stay across the three hospitals was 6.5 days, more than 30% less than the Victorian average for the preceding year. This was associated with high rates of discharge to rehabilitation facilities (mean 64%), with rates varying between the three hospitals (97%, 57% and 40%). However, in each hospital, one-third of this group had already achieved a level of independent functional mobility adequate for discharge home, highlighting an apparent influence of non-clinical factors on discharge decisions, including pressure to decrease length of stay, hospital policy and availability of a rehabilitation bed. Ways of achieving discharge directly home for a greater number of patients following knee arthroplasty and of determining optimal length of stay are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"56-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00411.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-12DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00419.x
Peter Baume AO, MD, BS, HonLittD, FRACP, Hon FRACGP, FAFPHM
{"title":"Aspects of the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme","authors":"Peter Baume AO, MD, BS, HonLittD, FRACP, Hon FRACGP, FAFPHM","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00419.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00419.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"21 3","pages":"89-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00419.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57636969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-05DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00332.x
Id Steven MD, MPH, FRACGP, Sa Thomas PhD, DipPubPol, E Eckerman MA, PhD, C Browning MSc, E Dickens MGeront, DipEdPsych
Abstract The objective of this study was, by means of patient self-report, to measure the provision of preventive care to patients of a sample of Australian general practitioners. Patient-completed questionnaires from a consecutive sample of Australian general pracitioners enrolled in the Quality Assurance and Continuing Medical Education Program of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners were used. Patients were attendees at Australian general practices. The main outcome measures included the following: the provision of tetanus immunization within the last 10 years; blood pressure measurement within the last 12 months; cholesterol screening within the past 5 years; provision of adequate information to enable patients to stop smoking if they desired; discussion about the benefits of diet and exercise to enhance life, and about alcohol intake; provision of cervical smears in the past 2 years; provision of adequate instruction in breast self-examination and overall satisfaction with service provision. A total of 12 605 questionnaires from 133 general practices were completed. There was wide variability between practices in the reported provision of preventive care items including an average of 86% (range 36–100) of patients reporting the provision of blood pressure checking in the past 12 months, 62% (range 25–97%) reporting the provision of tetanus immunization in the past 10 years, and 63% (range 10–91%) reporting having had a cervical smear in the past 2 years. Patients who were very satisfied were more likely to have reported that they had received blood pressure measurement in the past 12 months, participated in discussions about the benefits of diet and exercise in enhancing life, and participated in discussions about alcohol intake and provision of adequate instruction in the technique of breast self-examination. Patient self-reporting identified variability between practitioners in the provision of preventive care conforming to accepted guidelines. Patients who reported that they were very satisfied or who regularly attend only one general practice reported the provision of more preventive care than those who were not very satisfied or who regularly visited two or more general practitioners.
{"title":"The provision of preventive care by general practitioners measured by patient completed questionnaires","authors":"Id Steven MD, MPH, FRACGP, Sa Thomas PhD, DipPubPol, E Eckerman MA, PhD, C Browning MSc, E Dickens MGeront, DipEdPsych","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00332.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00332.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The objective of this study was, by means of patient self-report, to measure the provision of preventive care to patients of a sample of Australian general practitioners. Patient-completed questionnaires from a consecutive sample of Australian general pracitioners enrolled in the Quality Assurance and Continuing Medical Education Program of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners were used. Patients were attendees at Australian general practices. The main outcome measures included the following: the provision of tetanus immunization within the last 10 years; blood pressure measurement within the last 12 months; cholesterol screening within the past 5 years; provision of adequate information to enable patients to stop smoking if they desired; discussion about the benefits of diet and exercise to enhance life, and about alcohol intake; provision of cervical smears in the past 2 years; provision of adequate instruction in breast self-examination and overall satisfaction with service provision. A total of 12 605 questionnaires from 133 general practices were completed. There was wide variability between practices in the reported provision of preventive care items including an average of 86% (range 36–100) of patients reporting the provision of blood pressure checking in the past 12 months, 62% (range 25–97%) reporting the provision of tetanus immunization in the past 10 years, and 63% (range 10–91%) reporting having had a cervical smear in the past 2 years. Patients who were very satisfied were more likely to have reported that they had received blood pressure measurement in the past 12 months, participated in discussions about the benefits of diet and exercise in enhancing life, and participated in discussions about alcohol intake and provision of adequate instruction in the technique of breast self-examination. Patient self-reporting identified variability between practitioners in the provision of preventive care conforming to accepted guidelines. Patients who reported that they were very satisfied or who regularly attend only one general practice reported the provision of more preventive care than those who were not very satisfied or who regularly visited two or more general practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"19 4","pages":"195-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00332.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21474629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}