Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70038
Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic
Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households' budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay. Long-term expectations were largely unaffected. Counterfactuals show that one-year expectations would have been lower in 2020 and 2022 without these shocks. The findings suggest food price shocks warrant a measured response, not an overreaction, from central banks.
{"title":"Food Prices, Core Inflation, and Inflation Expectations in the United States","authors":"Puneet Vatsa, Gabriel Pino, Dragan Miljkovic","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using partially identified Bayesian structural vector autoregressions, we examine how food price shocks have influenced core inflation and inflation expectations in the United States since 1990. This is important, given the conspicuousness of food prices and the substantial share of food expenditure in households' budgets. Shocks raised one-year expectations immediately, with effects lasting nine quarters; they increased core inflation with a short delay. Long-term expectations were largely unaffected. Counterfactuals show that one-year expectations would have been lower in 2020 and 2022 without these shocks. The findings suggest food price shocks warrant a measured response, not an overreaction, from central banks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"435-446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70033
Davide Dell'Unto, Raffaele Cortignani
The present study uses an agroeconomic supply model to assess the impacts of 2023–2027 CAP on Italian specialized dairy cattle farms. The model considers the voluntary choice of Eco-Scheme 1, specifically addressed to livestock farms, through the implementation of binary variables. Results distinguish farms by classes of altimetry and herd dimension. The most relevant income reductions are borne by large farms and farms operating in plain areas, as income support shifts towards small farms and farms operating in mountain areas. Adhesion to Eco-Scheme 1 occurs among farms that use fewer antimicrobials per livestock unit and have an adequate availability of pastures.
{"title":"2023–2027 CAP First Pillar Reform and Livestock Sector: Production and Economic Impacts on Italian Specialized Dairy Cattle Farms","authors":"Davide Dell'Unto, Raffaele Cortignani","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study uses an agroeconomic supply model to assess the impacts of 2023–2027 CAP on Italian specialized dairy cattle farms. The model considers the voluntary choice of Eco-Scheme 1, specifically addressed to livestock farms, through the implementation of binary variables. Results distinguish farms by classes of altimetry and herd dimension. The most relevant income reductions are borne by large farms and farms operating in plain areas, as income support shifts towards small farms and farms operating in mountain areas. Adhesion to Eco-Scheme 1 occurs among farms that use fewer antimicrobials per livestock unit and have an adequate availability of pastures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"382-396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70046
Ryan Feuz
This study evaluates the potential for subsidy capture within the USDA's Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) insurance program. We show that contracts with expiration dates aligning with CME option expiration dates are purchased at elevated rates, particularly in feeder cattle and swine. The scale and timing of these purchases are consistent with subsidy capturing trading behavior. In contrast, we find no significant evidence of subsidy capture in fed cattle. Estimated maximum subsidy captures for 2024 reach $10 million in feeder cattle and $29.3 million in swine. Policy reforms targeting contract timing and pricing mechanisms are recommended to protect program integrity.
{"title":"Subsidy Capture in Livestock Risk Protection Insurance: Assessing Prevalence and Program Exposure","authors":"Ryan Feuz","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70046","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the potential for subsidy capture within the USDA's Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) insurance program. We show that contracts with expiration dates aligning with CME option expiration dates are purchased at elevated rates, particularly in feeder cattle and swine. The scale and timing of these purchases are consistent with subsidy capturing trading behavior. In contrast, we find no significant evidence of subsidy capture in fed cattle. Estimated maximum subsidy captures for 2024 reach $10 million in feeder cattle and $29.3 million in swine. Policy reforms targeting contract timing and pricing mechanisms are recommended to protect program integrity.</p><p><b>JEL Classification:</b> Q18, Q10, Q19</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"505-517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70034
Angela Jungbluth, Jungman Choi, K. Aleks Schaefer
Is there a trade-off between labor protections and environmental stewardship for organic foods? We investigate this question in the context of the U.S. apple industry. U.S. organic apple producers are heavily reliant on access to temporary foreign labor under the H-2A visa program. Using monthly U.S. retail price data from 2010 to 2023, we estimate the extent to which increased labor protections under H-2A have increased retail prices for organic apples relative to conventional apples. We find that changes in the H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEVR) affect retail organic price premiums. Our results suggest that a 1% increase in the AEVR corresponds to a 0.1% increase in the retail price premium for organic apples. Wage increases enhance security for foreign workers and support domestic production, but they may also make sustainable organic products more costly for consumers.
{"title":"Farm Labor Protections and Price Premiums for Organic Food","authors":"Angela Jungbluth, Jungman Choi, K. Aleks Schaefer","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Is there a trade-off between labor protections and environmental stewardship for organic foods? We investigate this question in the context of the U.S. apple industry. U.S. organic apple producers are heavily reliant on access to temporary foreign labor under the H-2A visa program. Using monthly U.S. retail price data from 2010 to 2023, we estimate the extent to which increased labor protections under H-2A have increased retail prices for organic apples relative to conventional apples. We find that changes in the H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEVR) affect retail organic price premiums. Our results suggest that a 1% increase in the AEVR corresponds to a 0.1% increase in the retail price premium for organic apples. Wage increases enhance security for foreign workers and support domestic production, but they may also make sustainable organic products more costly for consumers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"359-370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70048
Andu Berha
We estimate the impact of temperature shocks on the composition of farm labor in rural Nigeria using a nationally representative household panel survey. Leveraging plausibly exogenous year-to-year variation in growing season temperatures, we find that warmer temperatures significantly alter farm labor composition, prompting a substantial shift away from hired labor toward family labor. Interestingly, the displaced hired labor is not easily absorbed into non-farm sectors in the short term; instead, high temperatures also reduce household participation in local non-farm wage employment. We further provide suggestive evidence that households reallocate labor in response to temperature shocks because extreme heat renders reliance on external labor economically less viable. In particular, heat stress decreases farm productivity, lowering marginal returns to labor and incentivizing farmers to substitute costly hired labor with household labor. These findings underscore the multifaceted threat that climate change poses to rural livelihoods, reducing not only crop yields but also distorting labor allocation in ways that may further constrain farm productivity.
{"title":"Temperature and Farm Labor in Nigeria","authors":"Andu Berha","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We estimate the impact of temperature shocks on the composition of farm labor in rural Nigeria using a nationally representative household panel survey. Leveraging plausibly exogenous year-to-year variation in growing season temperatures, we find that warmer temperatures significantly alter farm labor composition, prompting a substantial shift away from hired labor toward family labor. Interestingly, the displaced hired labor is not easily absorbed into non-farm sectors in the short term; instead, high temperatures also reduce household participation in local non-farm wage employment. We further provide suggestive evidence that households reallocate labor in response to temperature shocks because extreme heat renders reliance on external labor economically less viable. In particular, heat stress decreases farm productivity, lowering marginal returns to labor and incentivizing farmers to substitute costly hired labor with household labor. These findings underscore the multifaceted threat that climate change poses to rural livelihoods, reducing not only crop yields but also distorting labor allocation in ways that may further constrain farm productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"518-530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70044
David Boussios, Brenda Boetel, Tanner McCarty
Since 2019, negotiated and formula hog values have increasingly diverged. Using rolling regression models, we demonstrate that the divergence is likely due to a switch from using negotiated hog values to using pork prices for valuing formula hogs, limiting the previously theorized impacts of thin negotiated hog markets on producer welfare. The change in the formulas raises timely questions about the thinness of wholesale pork markets, risk sharing through public information, and transparency in formula pricing.
{"title":"Changes to Hog Formulas: Swapping Negotiated Hogs With Pork Cutout Values","authors":"David Boussios, Brenda Boetel, Tanner McCarty","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since 2019, negotiated and formula hog values have increasingly diverged. Using rolling regression models, we demonstrate that the divergence is likely due to a switch from using negotiated hog values to using pork prices for valuing formula hogs, limiting the previously theorized impacts of thin negotiated hog markets on producer welfare. The change in the formulas raises timely questions about the thinness of wholesale pork markets, risk sharing through public information, and transparency in formula pricing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"462-472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70025
Fahd Majeed, Madhu Khanna, Ruiqing Miao
Perennial bioenergy crops, such as miscanthus and switchgrass, and crop residues have the potential to scale up sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production and mitigate carbon emissions. However, high establishment costs, delayed returns, and risk–return profiles that diverge from those of conventional crops can hinder incentives to adopt bioenergy crops. We develop an economic model that incorporates spatially varying joint yield and price distributions for the multiple crop choices a farmer faces and apply it to examine the incentives for risk-averse, present-biased, and credit-constrained farmers to produce cellulosic feedstocks under various biomass prices. We link this model to a biogeochemical model to quantify the spatially varying carbon mitigation benefits from these feedstocks in the rainfed region of the United States. We also analyze the cost-effectiveness of two carbon payment policies: annual and upfront. We find that risk-averse, present-biased, or credit-constrained farmers prefer to grow the lower-yielding but less risky switchgrass and harvest corn stover instead of the lower carbon, higher-yielding but riskier feedstock miscanthus, resulting in lower SAF production. Upfront carbon payments incentivize higher quantities of less carbon-intensive SAF production by risk-averse, credit-constrained, and present-biased farmers because they offset a part of the establishment costs of miscanthus. We also find that when farmers are credit-constrained, upfront payments are more cost-effective in terms of carbon mitigation per dollar spent. In contrast, annual payments are more cost-effective when farmers can access credit.
{"title":"Designing Cost-Effective Carbon Payments to Induce Cellulosic Feedstock Production for Sustainable Aviation Fuel","authors":"Fahd Majeed, Madhu Khanna, Ruiqing Miao","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perennial bioenergy crops, such as miscanthus and switchgrass, and crop residues have the potential to scale up sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production and mitigate carbon emissions. However, high establishment costs, delayed returns, and risk–return profiles that diverge from those of conventional crops can hinder incentives to adopt bioenergy crops. We develop an economic model that incorporates spatially varying joint yield and price distributions for the multiple crop choices a farmer faces and apply it to examine the incentives for risk-averse, present-biased, and credit-constrained farmers to produce cellulosic feedstocks under various biomass prices. We link this model to a biogeochemical model to quantify the spatially varying carbon mitigation benefits from these feedstocks in the rainfed region of the United States. We also analyze the cost-effectiveness of two carbon payment policies: annual and upfront. We find that risk-averse, present-biased, or credit-constrained farmers prefer to grow the lower-yielding but less risky switchgrass and harvest corn stover instead of the lower carbon, higher-yielding but riskier feedstock miscanthus, resulting in lower SAF production. Upfront carbon payments incentivize higher quantities of less carbon-intensive SAF production by risk-averse, credit-constrained, and present-biased farmers because they offset a part of the establishment costs of miscanthus. We also find that when farmers are credit-constrained, upfront payments are more cost-effective in terms of carbon mitigation per dollar spent. In contrast, annual payments are more cost-effective when farmers can access credit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"346-358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70037
Nathan Palardy, Marco Costanigro, Joshua Berning, Jude Bayham
We study how expanding alcohol availability at grocery and convenience stores affects consumer traffic in liquor stores by leveraging recent changes in state-level alcohol distribution laws in a difference-in-difference quasi-experimental design. Results indicate that more extensive liberalization results in higher losses of traffic at liquor stores and that the impact is dynamic over time. Additionally, the overall impact at rural stores is larger compared to urban stores. We discuss the economic, geographic, and behavioral factors behind the heterogeneous impacts of the policy and develop a general theory of the effects of liberalization on the liquor store sector.
{"title":"Changes in Alcohol Retail Laws and Foot Traffic at Liquor Stores","authors":"Nathan Palardy, Marco Costanigro, Joshua Berning, Jude Bayham","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study how expanding alcohol availability at grocery and convenience stores affects consumer traffic in liquor stores by leveraging recent changes in state-level alcohol distribution laws in a difference-in-difference quasi-experimental design. Results indicate that more extensive liberalization results in higher losses of traffic at liquor stores and that the impact is dynamic over time. Additionally, the overall impact at rural stores is larger compared to urban stores. We discuss the economic, geographic, and behavioral factors behind the heterogeneous impacts of the policy and develop a general theory of the effects of liberalization on the liquor store sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"447-461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-09-28DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70028
Yawotse Nouve, Yuqing Zheng, Shuoli Zhao, Harry M. Kaiser, Diansheng Dong
A shift towards plant-based diets has appeared as a sustainable solution to the increasing carbon footprint. Despite a significant surge in popularity, the efficacy of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) in achieving the stated goals of enhancing public health, environmental sustainability, and animal welfare through the displacement of animal-based meats (ABMs) remains inconclusive. Leveraging detailed, representative household scanner data from 2019 to 2021 for 136,553 households, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of consumer demand for PBMAs relative to ABMs. Unlike prior research that primarily relied on experimental methods or highly aggregated market-level data, this study investigates the extent to which consumers have shifted their protein choices from traditional ABM options to PBMAs based on 26 detailed product categories, thereby offering new insights into the full spectrum of consumer preferences for PBMAs et ABMs. We find that consumers allocate a marginal proportion of their meat budget to PBMAs and are more responsive to the price of PBMAs compared to ABMs, suggesting that price is still one of the major barriers impeding the protein transition. In addition, our analysis of substitution patterns indicates that, depending on the product category, PBMAs serve as both substitutes (e.g., plan-based beef patty) and complements (e.g., plant-based bacon) to their ABM counterparts. Combining results from market trends and demand relationships, the PBMAs have not yet looked promising in displacing ABMs in the short-term future.
{"title":"Disaggregated Substitution Patterns Between Plant-Based and Animal Meats: Evidence From U.S. Household Purchases","authors":"Yawotse Nouve, Yuqing Zheng, Shuoli Zhao, Harry M. Kaiser, Diansheng Dong","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A shift towards plant-based diets has appeared as a sustainable solution to the increasing carbon footprint. Despite a significant surge in popularity, the efficacy of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) in achieving the stated goals of enhancing public health, environmental sustainability, and animal welfare through the displacement of animal-based meats (ABMs) remains inconclusive. Leveraging detailed, representative household scanner data from 2019 to 2021 for 136,553 households, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of consumer demand for PBMAs relative to ABMs. Unlike prior research that primarily relied on experimental methods or highly aggregated market-level data, this study investigates the extent to which consumers have shifted their protein choices from traditional ABM options to PBMAs based on 26 detailed product categories, thereby offering new insights into the full spectrum of consumer preferences for PBMAs et ABMs. We find that consumers allocate a marginal proportion of their meat budget to PBMAs and are more responsive to the price of PBMAs compared to ABMs, suggesting that price is still one of the major barriers impeding the protein transition. In addition, our analysis of substitution patterns indicates that, depending on the product category, PBMAs serve as both substitutes (e.g., plan-based beef patty) and complements (e.g., plant-based bacon) to their ABM counterparts. Combining results from market trends and demand relationships, the PBMAs have not yet looked promising in displacing ABMs in the short-term future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"312-323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-02Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70030
Dewey J. Robertson, Roman Keeney, Jayson Beckman
This paper examines potential effects of reversing North American integration, focusing on recent USMCA trade disputes over Mexico's GE corn import ban. Using a CGE model, we simulate Mexico's reduction in GE grain imports and U.S. tariff escalation with partner retaliation. Results show significant disruptions: U.S. grain exports fall by 9.3%, and Mexican grain output rises 16% amid sectoral inefficiencies. Broad-based tariffs distort production, reduce GDP in Mexico and Canada, and shift global trade patterns. U.S. subsidies partially offset domestic losses but increase fiscal burdens. Our findings highlight the high economic costs and global spillovers from reversing regional agricultural integration.
{"title":"Reversing Regional Integration: The Potential Costs for Agriculture in the USMCA","authors":"Dewey J. Robertson, Roman Keeney, Jayson Beckman","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aepp.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines potential effects of reversing North American integration, focusing on recent USMCA trade disputes over Mexico's GE corn import ban. Using a CGE model, we simulate Mexico's reduction in GE grain imports and U.S. tariff escalation with partner retaliation. Results show significant disruptions: U.S. grain exports fall by 9.3%, and Mexican grain output rises 16% amid sectoral inefficiencies. Broad-based tariffs distort production, reduce GDP in Mexico and Canada, and shift global trade patterns. U.S. subsidies partially offset domestic losses but increase fiscal burdens. Our findings highlight the high economic costs and global spillovers from reversing regional agricultural integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 2","pages":"371-381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}