首页 > 最新文献

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy最新文献

英文 中文
From Surplus to Deficit: Decoding the Fundamental Shift in US Agricultural Trade 从盈余到赤字:解读美国农业贸易的根本转变
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70023
Yi Li, Kuan-Ming Huang, Zhengfei Guan, Xiaoli Etienne

The United States has been the world's largest agricultural exporter, consistently recording substantial surpluses in agricultural trade for decades. However, this landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years, with the US incurring a trade deficit ($1 billion) for the first time in 2019 since the USDA trade statistics became available in 1967. This deficit climbed to a staggering $21 billion in 2023 and continues to grow. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the shifting US trade patterns from 1985 to 2023, focusing on bilateral agricultural trade with major trade partners and key commodity flows. Structural break analysis is employed to identify significant turning points. Breaks are found in trade with China, Canada, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and Australia. Trade with China stands out as the most disrupted, with structural breaks closely aligned with the imposition of retaliatory tariffs during the US–China trade war. No structural breakpoints are detected in US–Mexico agricultural trade. The rapid and consistent growth in imports from Mexico in recent years has been a significant force behind the spiking US agricultural trade deficits. The potential driving factors behind the observed trends and identified structural breaks are discussed.

美国一直是世界上最大的农业出口国,几十年来一直保持着大量的农业贸易顺差。然而,近年来这种情况发生了巨大变化,自1967年美国农业部贸易统计数据公布以来,美国在2019年首次出现贸易逆差(10亿美元)。这一赤字在2023年攀升至惊人的210亿美元,并将继续增长。本研究对1985年至2023年美国贸易模式的变化进行了深入分析,重点关注与主要贸易伙伴的双边农业贸易和关键商品流动。结构断裂分析用于识别重要的转折点。与中国、加拿大、东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)和澳大利亚的贸易出现了中断。与中国的贸易受到的冲击最大,结构性断裂与中美贸易战期间征收报复性关税密切相关。美墨农业贸易未发现结构性断点。近年来,美国从墨西哥的进口持续快速增长,是美国农产品贸易逆差不断扩大背后的一个重要因素。讨论了观察到的趋势和确定的结构断裂背后的潜在驱动因素。
{"title":"From Surplus to Deficit: Decoding the Fundamental Shift in US Agricultural Trade","authors":"Yi Li,&nbsp;Kuan-Ming Huang,&nbsp;Zhengfei Guan,&nbsp;Xiaoli Etienne","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The United States has been the world's largest agricultural exporter, consistently recording substantial surpluses in agricultural trade for decades. However, this landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years, with the US incurring a trade deficit ($1 billion) for the first time in 2019 since the USDA trade statistics became available in 1967. This deficit climbed to a staggering $21 billion in 2023 and continues to grow. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the shifting US trade patterns from 1985 to 2023, focusing on bilateral agricultural trade with major trade partners and key commodity flows. Structural break analysis is employed to identify significant turning points. Breaks are found in trade with China, Canada, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and Australia. Trade with China stands out as the most disrupted, with structural breaks closely aligned with the imposition of retaliatory tariffs during the US–China trade war. No structural breakpoints are detected in US–Mexico agricultural trade. The rapid and consistent growth in imports from Mexico in recent years has been a significant force behind the spiking US agricultural trade deficits. The potential driving factors behind the observed trends and identified structural breaks are discussed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"47 5","pages":"1774-1790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145501003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategic Advocacy for Higher Education Research: Insights From US Agricultural Experiment Station Funding 高等教育研究的战略倡导:来自美国农业实验站资助的见解
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70024
Gregory M. Perry, Trey Malone, Jay T. Akridge

Amidst dwindling state funding and the legislative withdrawal from public university research support, a heightened political process shapes the allocation of scarce tax dollars. This article explores how advocacy within the political process influences funding support for higher education from state legislatures. We generate a novel dataset of state-level experiment station funding allocations and explanatory variables from 2004 to 2018 to explore the financial and political elements impacting the support for state agricultural research funding decisions. We also address the interplay of economic conditions, legislative professionalism, and political will in shaping the funding landscape. Our findings emphasize that university advocacy efforts to connect with legislators and strategic positioning within university hierarchies are correlated with maintained and expanded agricultural research station funding.

随着国家资金的减少和立法机构从公立大学的研究支持中撤出,一个高度政治化的过程决定了稀缺的税收资金的分配。本文探讨了政治过程中的倡导如何影响州立法机构对高等教育的资金支持。本文建立了2004年至2018年国家级实验站资金分配和解释变量的新数据集,以探讨影响国家农业科研资助决策支持的财政和政治因素。我们还讨论了经济条件、立法专业精神和政治意愿在塑造融资格局方面的相互作用。我们的研究结果强调,大学与立法者联系的宣传努力和大学层级内的战略定位与维持和扩大农业研究站的资助相关。
{"title":"Strategic Advocacy for Higher Education Research: Insights From US Agricultural Experiment Station Funding","authors":"Gregory M. Perry,&nbsp;Trey Malone,&nbsp;Jay T. Akridge","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amidst dwindling state funding and the legislative withdrawal from public university research support, a heightened political process shapes the allocation of scarce tax dollars. This article explores how advocacy within the political process influences funding support for higher education from state legislatures. We generate a novel dataset of state-level experiment station funding allocations and explanatory variables from 2004 to 2018 to explore the financial and political elements impacting the support for state agricultural research funding decisions. We also address the interplay of economic conditions, legislative professionalism, and political will in shaping the funding landscape. Our findings emphasize that university advocacy efforts to connect with legislators and strategic positioning within university hierarchies are correlated with maintained and expanded agricultural research station funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"251-265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Row Crops and the U.S. Agricultural Trade Deficit: Recent Trends and Policy Issues 行栽作物和美国农业贸易逆差:近期趋势和政策问题
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70022
William Ridley, Stephen Devadoss

Row crops such as soybeans, corn, wheat, and cotton are the backbone of the U.S. farm sector, accounting for around $60 billion of exports in 2023. While U.S. row crop exports remain robust, growing concerns over the rising U.S. agricultural trade deficit underscore the need to appraise the ongoing market and policy dynamics affecting the viability of this key sector. To this end, we analyze recent trends and policy issues impacting U.S. row crops. In particular, we highlight how trade and domestic policies, evolving comparative advantages, and other market forces have shaped recent trade patterns. We also provide a forward-looking assessment of how U.S. trade in row crops is likely to evolve in coming years, and further outline potential policy approaches to maintaining the U.S. position in global markets for row crops.

大豆、玉米、小麦和棉花等行作物是美国农业部门的支柱,2023年的出口额约为600亿美元。尽管美国的行栽作物出口依然强劲,但对美国农业贸易逆差上升的担忧日益加剧,这凸显了评估当前影响这一关键部门生存能力的市场和政策动态的必要性。为此,我们分析了影响美国行栽作物的近期趋势和政策问题。我们特别强调了贸易和国内政策、不断演变的比较优势以及其他市场力量如何塑造了近期的贸易格局。我们还对未来几年美国行作物贸易的发展进行了前瞻性评估,并进一步概述了维持美国在全球行作物市场地位的潜在政策方法。
{"title":"Row Crops and the U.S. Agricultural Trade Deficit: Recent Trends and Policy Issues","authors":"William Ridley,&nbsp;Stephen Devadoss","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Row crops such as soybeans, corn, wheat, and cotton are the backbone of the U.S. farm sector, accounting for around $60 billion of exports in 2023. While U.S. row crop exports remain robust, growing concerns over the rising U.S. agricultural trade deficit underscore the need to appraise the ongoing market and policy dynamics affecting the viability of this key sector. To this end, we analyze recent trends and policy issues impacting U.S. row crops. In particular, we highlight how trade and domestic policies, evolving comparative advantages, and other market forces have shaped recent trade patterns. We also provide a forward-looking assessment of how U.S. trade in row crops is likely to evolve in coming years, and further outline potential policy approaches to maintaining the U.S. position in global markets for row crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"47 5","pages":"1759-1773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145500945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual Water Trade and Economic Integration: The Role of Trade Agreements in Global Water Redistribution 虚拟水贸易与经济一体化:贸易协定在全球水再分配中的作用
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70021
Dongin Kim, Sandro Steinbach, Carlos Zurita

This paper examines the impact of economic integration agreements (EIAs) on virtual water trade (VWT) using a three-way gravity model and a novel dataset integrating international and intra-national water flows. We find that EIAs increase VWT by 18.2%, with deeper integration having a greater impact. Agreements containing water management provisions expand VWT by 42.8%, compared to 16.4% for those without. These provisions facilitate virtual water exports from water-abundant regions while curbing them from water-scarce regions. While limitations remain in how current trade policies address water allocation imbalances, our results suggest the potential for embedding targeted environmental clauses in EIAs to align trade flows with water availability and support more sustainable patterns of global resource use.

本文利用一个三方引力模型和一个整合国际和国内水流的新数据集,研究了经济一体化协议(EIAs)对虚拟水贸易(VWT)的影响。我们发现,环评使VWT增加了18.2%,深度整合的影响更大。包含水资源管理条款的协议使VWT增加42.8%,而不包含该条款的协议使VWT增加16.4%。这些规定促进了水资源丰富地区的实际水出口,同时限制了缺水地区的出口。尽管目前的贸易政策在解决水资源分配失衡方面仍存在局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,在环评中嵌入有针对性的环境条款,使贸易流动与水资源供应保持一致,并支持更可持续的全球资源利用模式,是有潜力的。
{"title":"Virtual Water Trade and Economic Integration: The Role of Trade Agreements in Global Water Redistribution","authors":"Dongin Kim,&nbsp;Sandro Steinbach,&nbsp;Carlos Zurita","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper examines the impact of economic integration agreements (EIAs) on virtual water trade (VWT) using a three-way gravity model and a novel dataset integrating international and intra-national water flows. We find that EIAs increase VWT by 18.2%, with deeper integration having a greater impact. Agreements containing water management provisions expand VWT by 42.8%, compared to 16.4% for those without. These provisions facilitate virtual water exports from water-abundant regions while curbing them from water-scarce regions. While limitations remain in how current trade policies address water allocation imbalances, our results suggest the potential for embedding targeted environmental clauses in EIAs to align trade flows with water availability and support more sustainable patterns of global resource use.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"47 5","pages":"1998-2018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145500946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Try Before You Buy: Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Tailored Agricultural Advice in Nigeria 在你购买之前先试一试:关于尼日利亚愿意为量身定制的农业建议付费的实验证据
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70020
Oyakhilomen Oyinbo, Jordan Chamberlin, Miet Maertens

Using a randomized controlled trial and a choice experiment in Nigeria, we examine the impact of a 2-year free provision of tailored advice through a digital decision support tool (DST) on farmers' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a targeted decision support system. We find that farmers are willing to pay varying subscription fees to access different kinds of tailored advice. Also, we find that 2 years of exposure to DST-mediated interventions significantly increases farmers' WTP for tailored advice, particularly for soil fertility management and market information, but does not fully cover the costs of delivering such advice. On average, control farmers are willing to pay around 1–2 USD per year for different kinds of tailored advice, and treatment farmers are willing to pay 19%–85% more than the control in response to the interventions. In settings like ours, where there is limited viability of business models for DST-mediated advice that rely on full cost recovery from farmers, continued public support—through subsidized subscription fees and public investment in upscaling DSTs may be required, consistent with the public good nature of traditional agricultural extension.

通过在尼日利亚进行的随机对照试验和选择实验,我们检验了通过数字决策支持工具(DST)免费提供2年量身定制建议对农民为有针对性的决策支持系统付费意愿(WTP)的影响。我们发现,农民愿意支付不同的订阅费,以获得不同类型的量身定制的建议。此外,我们发现,接受两年的dst介导的干预措施显著增加了农民获得量身定制建议(特别是土壤肥力管理和市场信息)的WTP,但并不能完全覆盖提供此类建议的成本。对照农户平均每年愿意为不同类型的量身定制咨询支付1-2美元左右的费用,而干预农户愿意比对照农户多支付19%-85%的费用。在像我们这样的环境中,依靠农民全额收回成本的以滴滴涕为中介的咨询业务模式的可行性有限,因此可能需要通过补贴订阅费用和公共投资来继续提供公共支持,以扩大滴滴涕的规模,这与传统农业推广的公益性质是一致的。
{"title":"Try Before You Buy: Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Tailored Agricultural Advice in Nigeria","authors":"Oyakhilomen Oyinbo,&nbsp;Jordan Chamberlin,&nbsp;Miet Maertens","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using a randomized controlled trial and a choice experiment in Nigeria, we examine the impact of a 2-year free provision of tailored advice through a digital decision support tool (DST) on farmers' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a targeted decision support system. We find that farmers are willing to pay varying subscription fees to access different kinds of tailored advice. Also, we find that 2 years of exposure to DST-mediated interventions significantly increases farmers' WTP for tailored advice, particularly for soil fertility management and market information, but does not fully cover the costs of delivering such advice. On average, control farmers are willing to pay around 1–2 USD per year for different kinds of tailored advice, and treatment farmers are willing to pay 19%–85% more than the control in response to the interventions. In settings like ours, where there is limited viability of business models for DST-mediated advice that rely on full cost recovery from farmers, continued public support—through subsidized subscription fees and public investment in upscaling DSTs may be required, consistent with the public good nature of traditional agricultural extension.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"196-226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Soil Carbon Sequestration Through Cover Crops: The Role of Implicit Costs in Alabama Cotton Fields 通过覆盖作物评估土壤碳固存:隐性成本在阿拉巴马州棉田的作用
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70019
Sunjae Won, Seong-Hoon Cho, Mykel Taylor

This study evaluates the economic feasibility of carbon sequestration through cover cropping in Alabama cotton fields, emphasizing the role of implicit costs, proxied by cash rent and reflecting land productivity and market proximity. Using a cost-efficiency optimization model, we compare carbon supply curves under two cost assumptions: one with explicit costs and another with both explicit and implicit costs. While the carbon supply appears nearly linear with explicit costs alone, adding implicit costs sharply raises sequestration costs, revealing diminishing carbon sequestration efficiency. Spatial analysis highlights regional disparities driven by land values, underscoring the need for targeted, region-specific policy incentives to strengthen the effectiveness of agricultural carbon markets.

本研究评估了阿拉巴马州棉田覆盖种植固碳的经济可行性,强调了隐性成本的作用,以现金租金为代表,反映了土地生产力和市场邻近性。利用成本效率优化模型,我们比较了两种成本假设下的碳供给曲线:一种是显性成本,另一种是显性成本和隐性成本。虽然碳供应在单独考虑显性成本时几乎呈线性,但增加隐性成本会大幅提高固碳成本,从而显示出碳固碳效率的下降。空间分析强调了由土地价值驱动的区域差异,强调需要有针对性的、针对特定区域的政策激励措施来加强农业碳市场的有效性。
{"title":"Assessing Soil Carbon Sequestration Through Cover Crops: The Role of Implicit Costs in Alabama Cotton Fields","authors":"Sunjae Won,&nbsp;Seong-Hoon Cho,&nbsp;Mykel Taylor","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study evaluates the economic feasibility of carbon sequestration through cover cropping in Alabama cotton fields, emphasizing the role of implicit costs, proxied by cash rent and reflecting land productivity and market proximity. Using a cost-efficiency optimization model, we compare carbon supply curves under two cost assumptions: one with explicit costs and another with both explicit and implicit costs. While the carbon supply appears nearly linear with explicit costs alone, adding implicit costs sharply raises sequestration costs, revealing diminishing carbon sequestration efficiency. Spatial analysis highlights regional disparities driven by land values, underscoring the need for targeted, region-specific policy incentives to strengthen the effectiveness of agricultural carbon markets.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"227-250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimum Wage Impacts on Labor Market Outcomes in the U.S. Food-Manufacturing Industry 最低工资对美国食品制造业劳动力市场结果的影响
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70018
Dahye Kim

This study examines the impact of minimum wage policies on low-wage food processing workers. The empirical analysis assesses how minimum wage policies affect hourly wages, working hours and weeks, and the likelihood of employment. The findings indicate significant wage increases but no adverse employment effects in the overall food-manufacturing industry. However, subsector and subpopulation analyses reveal significant heterogeneity, with wage gains concentrated in certain subsectors and positive employment effects for males and natives but negative effects for immigrants. These findings emphasize the need to consider industry specific and demographic characteristics when evaluating the impact of minimum wage policies.

本研究考察了最低工资政策对低工资食品加工工人的影响。实证分析评估了最低工资政策对小时工资、工作时间和周数以及就业可能性的影响。研究结果表明,工资大幅上涨,但对整个食品制造业的就业没有不利影响。然而,分部门和亚人口分析揭示了显著的异质性,工资增长集中在某些分部门,对男性和本地人有积极的就业影响,但对移民有消极影响。这些研究结果强调,在评估最低工资政策的影响时,需要考虑行业具体情况和人口特征。
{"title":"Minimum Wage Impacts on Labor Market Outcomes in the U.S. Food-Manufacturing Industry","authors":"Dahye Kim","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines the impact of minimum wage policies on low-wage food processing workers. The empirical analysis assesses how minimum wage policies affect hourly wages, working hours and weeks, and the likelihood of employment. The findings indicate significant wage increases but no adverse employment effects in the overall food-manufacturing industry. However, subsector and subpopulation analyses reveal significant heterogeneity, with wage gains concentrated in certain subsectors and positive employment effects for males and natives but negative effects for immigrants. These findings emphasize the need to consider industry specific and demographic characteristics when evaluating the impact of minimum wage policies.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"47 5","pages":"1745-1758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145500792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effects of Information Interventions and Social Interactions on the Valuations of Zinc Rice Seeds: Evidence From a Field Experiment With Rice Farmers 信息干预和社会互动对锌稻种子价值的影响:来自稻农田间试验的证据
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70012
Syed Imran Ali Meerza, Khondoker Mottaleb

Zinc biofortified rice presents a promising solution for addressing zinc deficiencies in developing countries, but its adoption is still very limited. Interventions that provide information on both demand and supply, along with social interactions, have the potential to increase farmers' adoption of biofortified crops such as zinc rice, though their combined effects are not well explored. Our study examines how information-based interventions and social interactions impact smallholder farmers' valuations of zinc and non-zinc rice seeds in the context of Bangladesh. Results reveal that demand-side information about zinc rice alone significantly raises farmers' willingness to pay for zinc rice seeds and that additional supply-side information further raises this premium. Our findings also indicate that combining information-based interventions with social interactions among farmers had a synergistic effect, promoting greater adoption of zinc rice. The results provide a key policy implication that combining information-based interventions with social interactions can effectively promote biofortified crops and other agricultural innovations.

锌生物强化大米为解决发展中国家的锌缺乏问题提供了一个很有希望的解决方案,但是它的采用仍然非常有限。提供需求和供应信息的干预措施,以及社会互动,有可能增加农民对锌稻等生物强化作物的采用,尽管它们的综合效果尚未得到很好的探索。我们的研究考察了孟加拉国基于信息的干预措施和社会互动如何影响小农对锌和非锌水稻种子的估值。结果表明,锌稻的需求侧信息单独显著提高了农民购买锌稻种子的意愿,而额外的供给侧信息进一步提高了这种溢价。我们的研究结果还表明,将信息干预与农民之间的社会互动相结合具有协同效应,可以促进锌稻的广泛采用。研究结果提供了一个关键的政策启示,即将基于信息的干预与社会互动相结合,可以有效地促进生物强化作物和其他农业创新。
{"title":"The Effects of Information Interventions and Social Interactions on the Valuations of Zinc Rice Seeds: Evidence From a Field Experiment With Rice Farmers","authors":"Syed Imran Ali Meerza,&nbsp;Khondoker Mottaleb","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Zinc biofortified rice presents a promising solution for addressing zinc deficiencies in developing countries, but its adoption is still very limited. Interventions that provide information on both demand and supply, along with social interactions, have the potential to increase farmers' adoption of biofortified crops such as zinc rice, though their combined effects are not well explored. Our study examines how information-based interventions and social interactions impact smallholder farmers' valuations of zinc and non-zinc rice seeds in the context of Bangladesh. Results reveal that demand-side information about zinc rice alone significantly raises farmers' willingness to pay for zinc rice seeds and that additional supply-side information further raises this premium. Our findings also indicate that combining information-based interventions with social interactions among farmers had a synergistic effect, promoting greater adoption of zinc rice. The results provide a key policy implication that combining information-based interventions with social interactions can effectively promote biofortified crops and other agricultural innovations.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"182-195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program Impact on Crop Indemnities 野猪防治试点项目对作物赔偿影响评价
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70016
Hence Duncan, Christopher N. Boyer, Eunchun Park, S. Aaron Smith

The 2018 Farm Bill established the Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program (FSCP), which was focused on removing feral hogs and restoring damaged property. We conduct a quasi-experimental analysis of FSCP on crop damage using crop insurance data and a staggered difference-in-difference model. We found that the FSCP reduced insurance losses for corn, but we did not find an effect on soybeans, cotton, wheat, or peanuts. There are ongoing policy discussions to continue, expand, or make FSCP permanent, and this analysis provides policymakers with a timely analysis of the FSCP impact on crop damage.

2018年的农业法案设立了野猪根除和控制试点计划(FSCP),该计划的重点是清除野猪和恢复受损财产。我们利用作物保险数据和交错差中差模型对FSCP对作物损害的影响进行了准实验分析。我们发现FSCP减少了玉米的保险损失,但我们没有发现对大豆、棉花、小麦或花生有影响。目前正在进行政策讨论,以继续、扩大或使FSCP永久存在,本分析为政策制定者提供了FSCP对作物损害影响的及时分析。
{"title":"Evaluating Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program Impact on Crop Indemnities","authors":"Hence Duncan,&nbsp;Christopher N. Boyer,&nbsp;Eunchun Park,&nbsp;S. Aaron Smith","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2018 Farm Bill established the Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program (FSCP), which was focused on removing feral hogs and restoring damaged property. We conduct a quasi-experimental analysis of FSCP on crop damage using crop insurance data and a staggered difference-in-difference model. We found that the FSCP reduced insurance losses for corn, but we did not find an effect on soybeans, cotton, wheat, or peanuts. There are ongoing policy discussions to continue, expand, or make FSCP permanent, and this analysis provides policymakers with a timely analysis of the FSCP impact on crop damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Consumers Value Diversity in Agriculture? A Choice Experiment 消费者重视农业的多样性吗?选择实验
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70017
Maria Kalaitzandonakes, Jared P. Hutchins, Gerald Mashange

Farm ownership in the US today is racially and ethnically homogeneous. Diverse farmers and ranchers make up less than 10% of all producers, they tend to be less financially stable and have tighter profit margins. In the past few years, both government and industry programs have aimed to increase the participation and profitability of diverse farmers, some of which have been rolled back in response to recent legal and political changes. Despite active debate, little is known about public support for diversity in agriculture. Here, we explore consumer demand for diversity in US agriculture by measuring willingness to pay for a diverse farmer label. We find evidence of a positive price premium for a diverse farmer label on average, with significant consumer heterogeneity. Demand differed across a variety of consumer attributes, including consumers' politics, gender, and connection to agriculture. Our results provide timely insights on public demand for diversity in agriculture.

今天美国的农场所有权是种族和民族同质化的。多样化的农民和牧场主占所有生产者的比例不到10%,他们往往财务不太稳定,利润率也更低。在过去的几年里,政府和行业的项目都旨在提高不同农民的参与度和盈利能力,其中一些项目因最近的法律和政治变化而被取消。尽管争论激烈,但公众对农业多样性的支持却知之甚少。在这里,我们通过衡量消费者为多样化农民标签付费的意愿来探索美国农业对多样性的需求。我们发现一个积极的价格溢价的证据,为一个多样化的农民标签,平均而言,显著的消费者异质性。需求因各种消费者属性而异,包括消费者的政治、性别和与农业的联系。我们的研究结果及时揭示了公众对农业多样性的需求。
{"title":"Do Consumers Value Diversity in Agriculture? A Choice Experiment","authors":"Maria Kalaitzandonakes,&nbsp;Jared P. Hutchins,&nbsp;Gerald Mashange","doi":"10.1002/aepp.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farm ownership in the US today is racially and ethnically homogeneous. Diverse farmers and ranchers make up less than 10% of all producers, they tend to be less financially stable and have tighter profit margins. In the past few years, both government and industry programs have aimed to increase the participation and profitability of diverse farmers, some of which have been rolled back in response to recent legal and political changes. Despite active debate, little is known about public support for diversity in agriculture. Here, we explore consumer demand for diversity in US agriculture by measuring willingness to pay for a diverse farmer label. We find evidence of a positive price premium for a diverse farmer label on average, with significant consumer heterogeneity. Demand differed across a variety of consumer attributes, including consumers' politics, gender, and connection to agriculture. Our results provide timely insights on public demand for diversity in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":"169-181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1