首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Immediate Reconstruction of Pancretaticogastrostomy Following Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Biliary Tact Cancer: A Single-Center Review of 33 Consecutive Patients 胆道癌肝胰十二指肠切除术后胰胃造口即刻重建:33例连续患者的单中心回顾
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70069
Ryusei Matsuyama, Yasuhiro Yabusita, Tomoaki Takahashi, Yutaro Kikuchi, Kouta Sahara, Kentaro Miyake, Yu Sawada, Yuuki Homma, Takafumi Kumamoto, Itaru Endo

Background and Purpose

Although hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is effective for margin-negative curative resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC), it is a highly invasive procedure, and its high complication rate, especially post-operative pancreatic fistula, and hospital mortality are still problems. In this study, we investigated the clinical usefulness of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) in BTC patients with HPD.

Patients and Methods

Of the 878 BTC resected in our institution from April 1992 to December 2022, 44 patients who underwent HPD for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC) were enrolled in this study. Perioperative factors and short-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated in two groups of 11 patients reconstructed with PJ and 33 patients reconstructed with PG. In addition, the temporal changes in glucose tolerance, nutritional status, and postoperative pancreatic morphology were examined.

Results

The incidence of Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 5 patients (45%) in the PJ group and 4 patients (12%) in the PG group, which was significantly lower in the PG group (p = 0.043). Hospital mortality was observed in 3 patients (27%) in the PJ group and 1 patient (3%) in the PG group (p = 0.060). In patients who underwent PG and were recurrence-free 24 months after surgery, there were no significant changes in HbA1c, serum Albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pancreatic duct diameter at 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Conclusions

PG with immediate reconstruction in HPD for BTC patients may reduce the rate of POPF and operative death without affecting long-term postoperative physiological statuses.

背景与目的肝胰十二指肠切除术(HPD)是胆道癌边缘阴性根治性切除的有效方法,但其高侵入性、高并发症,尤其是术后胰瘘和住院死亡率仍然是一个问题。在这项研究中,我们探讨了胰胃造口术(PG)在BTC合并HPD患者中的临床应用价值。患者和方法在1992年4月至2022年12月期间,本院共切除878例BTC,其中44例患者因肝门周围胆管癌(PHC)或胆囊癌(GBC)接受了HPD。对11例PJ重建患者和33例PG重建患者的围手术期因素和术后短期预后进行评估,并观察糖耐量、营养状况和术后胰腺形态的时间变化。结果术后B/C级胰瘘(POPF)发生率PJ组为5例(45%),PG组为4例(12%),PG组显著低于PJ组(p = 0.043)。PJ组住院死亡率为3例(27%),PG组住院死亡率为1例(3%)(p = 0.060)。在术后24个月无复发的PG患者中,术后12个月和24个月的HbA1c、血清白蛋白、预后营养指数(PNI)、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和胰管直径均无显著变化。结论在不影响术后长期生理状态的情况下,行PG立即重建HPD可降低术后POPF发生率和手术死亡率。
{"title":"Immediate Reconstruction of Pancretaticogastrostomy Following Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Biliary Tact Cancer: A Single-Center Review of 33 Consecutive Patients","authors":"Ryusei Matsuyama,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Yabusita,&nbsp;Tomoaki Takahashi,&nbsp;Yutaro Kikuchi,&nbsp;Kouta Sahara,&nbsp;Kentaro Miyake,&nbsp;Yu Sawada,&nbsp;Yuuki Homma,&nbsp;Takafumi Kumamoto,&nbsp;Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is effective for margin-negative curative resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC), it is a highly invasive procedure, and its high complication rate, especially post-operative pancreatic fistula, and hospital mortality are still problems. In this study, we investigated the clinical usefulness of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) in BTC patients with HPD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of the 878 BTC resected in our institution from April 1992 to December 2022, 44 patients who underwent HPD for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC) were enrolled in this study. Perioperative factors and short-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated in two groups of 11 patients reconstructed with PJ and 33 patients reconstructed with PG. In addition, the temporal changes in glucose tolerance, nutritional status, and postoperative pancreatic morphology were examined.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The incidence of Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 5 patients (45%) in the PJ group and 4 patients (12%) in the PG group, which was significantly lower in the PG group (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Hospital mortality was observed in 3 patients (27%) in the PJ group and 1 patient (3%) in the PG group (<i>p</i> = 0.060). In patients who underwent PG and were recurrence-free 24 months after surgery, there were no significant changes in HbA1c, serum Albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pancreatic duct diameter at 12 and 24 months after surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PG with immediate reconstruction in HPD for BTC patients may reduce the rate of POPF and operative death without affecting long-term postoperative physiological statuses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"187-196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70069","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145891499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deep Learning Model for Predicting Operative Mortality After Total Gastrectomy: Analysis of the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD) 预测全胃切除术后手术死亡率的深度学习模型:日本国家临床数据库(NCD)分析
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70067
Ryosuke Fukuyo, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Masanori Tokunaga, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Ken Shirabe

Background

Radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the primary treatment for gastric cancer. However, the overall complication rate remains approximately 10%–20%, with a postoperative mortality rate of 2.3%. Therefore, preoperative stratification of patients based on their expected surgical risks is important. This study aimed to develop a deep learning prediction model using big data from the National Clinical Database (NCD) to predict operative mortality after total gastrectomy.

Methods

Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and were registered in the NCD between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. A total of 62 variables, including age, sex, past medical history, preoperative blood test results, and tumor characteristics, were used as covariates, with operative mortality as the outcome variable. Deep learning models were developed using Python, TensorFlow and Keras. Hyperparameters were adjusted using the k-fold method with the training data. The model was evaluated using validation data.

Results

Of the 14 980 eligible cases, 11 980 were used for training and 3000 for validation. The event rate was 1.2%. A four-layer, 5217-variable model was developed. The final C-statistic was 0.79 (95% confidence intervals: 0.74–0.83) for the training data and 0.74 (95% confidence intervals: 0.62–0.85) for the validation data.

Conclusion

We developed a deep learning model to predict operative mortality using big data from the NCD. To improve the accuracy, it is necessary to introduce new variables related to postoperative complications or factors that cannot be analyzed using conventional methods.

背景胃癌根治性切除术加淋巴结清扫是胃癌的主要治疗方法。然而,总体并发症发生率仍约为10%-20%,术后死亡率为2.3%。因此,术前根据患者的预期手术风险进行分层是很重要的。本研究旨在利用国家临床数据库(NCD)的大数据建立深度学习预测模型,预测全胃切除术后的手术死亡率。方法纳入2018年1月至2019年12月在NCD登记的18岁及以上的胃癌全胃切除术患者。共使用62个变量作为协变量,包括年龄、性别、既往病史、术前血液检查结果和肿瘤特征,以手术死亡率为结局变量。使用Python、TensorFlow和Keras开发深度学习模型。使用k-fold方法对训练数据进行超参数调整。采用验证数据对模型进行评价。结果14 980例合格病例中,11 980例用于培训,3000例用于验证。事件发生率为1.2%。建立了一个四层5217个变量的模型。训练数据的最终c统计量为0.79(95%置信区间:0.74 - 0.83),验证数据的最终c统计量为0.74(95%置信区间:0.62-0.85)。结论:我们利用NCD的大数据开发了一个深度学习模型来预测手术死亡率。为了提高准确性,有必要引入与术后并发症或传统方法无法分析的因素相关的新变量。
{"title":"Deep Learning Model for Predicting Operative Mortality After Total Gastrectomy: Analysis of the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD)","authors":"Ryosuke Fukuyo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Masanori Tokunaga,&nbsp;Yusuke Kinugasa,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Kakeji,&nbsp;Ken Shirabe","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the primary treatment for gastric cancer. However, the overall complication rate remains approximately 10%–20%, with a postoperative mortality rate of 2.3%. Therefore, preoperative stratification of patients based on their expected surgical risks is important. This study aimed to develop a deep learning prediction model using big data from the National Clinical Database (NCD) to predict operative mortality after total gastrectomy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and were registered in the NCD between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. A total of 62 variables, including age, sex, past medical history, preoperative blood test results, and tumor characteristics, were used as covariates, with operative mortality as the outcome variable. Deep learning models were developed using Python, TensorFlow and Keras. Hyperparameters were adjusted using the k-fold method with the training data. The model was evaluated using validation data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of the 14 980 eligible cases, 11 980 were used for training and 3000 for validation. The event rate was 1.2%. A four-layer, 5217-variable model was developed. The final C-statistic was 0.79 (95% confidence intervals: 0.74–0.83) for the training data and 0.74 (95% confidence intervals: 0.62–0.85) for the validation data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We developed a deep learning model to predict operative mortality using big data from the NCD. To improve the accuracy, it is necessary to introduce new variables related to postoperative complications or factors that cannot be analyzed using conventional methods.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"67-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145891469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Efficacy of Pelvic Reinforcement Procedure for Preventing Postoperative Perineal Hernia After Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study 骨盆加固手术预防机器人腹会阴切除术后会阴疝的安全性和有效性:一项单中心、回顾性队列研究
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70066
Yoshihiro Sakai, Shunsuke Kasai, Akio Shiomi, Shoichi Manabe, Yusuke Yamaoka, Yusuke Tanaka, Takahiro Igaki, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Yusuke Kinugasa

Aim

Few reports have described pelvic reinforcement procedure (PRP) to prevent perineal hernia (PH) in robotic abdominoperineal resection (Ro-APR) for rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PRP in Ro-APR.

Methods

Patients who underwent Ro-APR for rectal cancer between January 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively examined. PRP was performed as a prophylactic procedure for PH. Four types of PRP were performed depending on the case (closure of the levator ani muscles, the pelvic peritoneum with the uterus, the pelvic peritoneum, and the pelvic peritoneum with a bladder peritoneal flap). Background factors and surgical outcomes were compared between patients without PRP (PRP−) and with PRP (PRP+). Imaged PH was diagnosed using computed tomography 1 year postoperatively. Imaged PH with symptoms was defined as symptomatic PH.

Results

We evaluated 81 patients, including 51 PRP− (63.0%) and 30 PRP+ (37.0%). There were no differences in the characteristics between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (358 min vs. 329 min, p = 0.460). PRP− had a significantly higher rate of imaged PH (39.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.005) and symptomatic PH (19.6% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.047). The two groups had no significant differences in the other postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factor for PH was not undergoing PRP (odds ratio 9.71, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

PRP in Ro-APR for rectal cancer can be safely performed and helps prevent PH.

目的很少有报道描述骨盆强化手术(PRP)预防会阴疝(PH)在机器人腹部会阴切除术(Ro-APR)直肠癌。本研究旨在探讨PRP治疗Ro-APR的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年6月期间接受Ro-APR治疗的直肠癌患者。PRP作为ph的预防性手术进行。根据病例进行四种类型的PRP(关闭提肛肌,盆腔腹膜与子宫,盆腔腹膜和盆腔腹膜与膀胱腹膜瓣)。比较无PRP (PRP−)和有PRP (PRP+)患者的背景因素和手术结果。术后1年通过计算机断层扫描诊断PH。有症状的PH图像被定义为症状性PH。结果我们评估了81例患者,其中51例PRP−(63.0%)和30例PRP+(37.0%)。两组之间的特征没有差异。两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(358 min vs 329 min, p = 0.460)。PRP−有更高的PH显像率(39.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.005)和症状性PH (19.6% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.047)。两组术后其他并发症无明显差异。在多因素分析中,PH的独立危险因素未进行PRP(优势比9.71,p = 0.005)。结论直肠癌Ro-APR的PRP可以安全进行,并有助于预防PH。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Pelvic Reinforcement Procedure for Preventing Postoperative Perineal Hernia After Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Yoshihiro Sakai,&nbsp;Shunsuke Kasai,&nbsp;Akio Shiomi,&nbsp;Shoichi Manabe,&nbsp;Yusuke Yamaoka,&nbsp;Yusuke Tanaka,&nbsp;Takahiro Igaki,&nbsp;Hiroyasu Kagawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Kinugasa","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Few reports have described pelvic reinforcement procedure (PRP) to prevent perineal hernia (PH) in robotic abdominoperineal resection (Ro-APR) for rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PRP in Ro-APR.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients who underwent Ro-APR for rectal cancer between January 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively examined. PRP was performed as a prophylactic procedure for PH. Four types of PRP were performed depending on the case (closure of the levator ani muscles, the pelvic peritoneum with the uterus, the pelvic peritoneum, and the pelvic peritoneum with a bladder peritoneal flap). Background factors and surgical outcomes were compared between patients without PRP (PRP−) and with PRP (PRP+). Imaged PH was diagnosed using computed tomography 1 year postoperatively. Imaged PH with symptoms was defined as symptomatic PH.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We evaluated 81 patients, including 51 PRP− (63.0%) and 30 PRP+ (37.0%). There were no differences in the characteristics between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (358 min vs. 329 min, <i>p</i> = 0.460). PRP− had a significantly higher rate of imaged PH (39.2% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and symptomatic PH (19.6% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.047). The two groups had no significant differences in the other postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factor for PH was not undergoing PRP (odds ratio 9.71, <i>p</i> = 0.005).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PRP in Ro-APR for rectal cancer can be safely performed and helps prevent PH.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145887367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Tumor Location on the Efficacy of Lateral and Mesenteric Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated by Upfront Surgery 肿瘤位置对直肠癌术前外侧及肠系膜淋巴结清扫疗效的影响
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70065
Tomofumi Uotani, Hiroshi Nagata, Yasuyuki Takamizawa, Konosuke Moritani, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Tsutomu Fujii, Yukihide Kanemitsu

Background

The relationship between tumor location and lymphatic flow is generally known to affect the efficacy of lymph node dissection, but the specific impact in rectal cancer remains unclear. This study investigated the frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and the efficacy of lymph node dissection based on tumor location.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 882 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection. Tumors were categorized by primary site into Ra (from the lower edge of S2 to the peritoneal reflection, n = 95), Rb (from the peritoneal reflection to the upper edge of the anal canal, n = 713), and P (anal canal, n = 74). LNM rates and dissection efficacy were assessed at each station. The therapeutic value index (TVI) was calculated as the LNM rate multiplied by the 5-year overall survival rate.

Results

LNM was observed in 447 patients (50.7%). Mesenteric LNM rates and the TVI were higher for tumors located more orally (49.5% and 43 for Ra, 46.1% and 29.7 for Rb, 43.2% and 17.6 for P), whereas lateral LNM rates and the TVI were higher for tumors located more anally (7.4% and 3.7 for Ra, 16.3% and 8 for Rb, 29.7% and 14.1 for P). Regardless of tumor location, the TVI in the lateral region was high in the distal internal iliac and obturator areas.

Conclusions

Tumor location influences LNM frequency and lymph node dissection efficacy in rectal cancer. Treatment strategies should be individualized based on tumor location to improve outcomes.

肿瘤位置与淋巴流量的关系通常会影响淋巴结清扫的疗效,但对直肠癌的具体影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了基于肿瘤位置的淋巴结转移(LNM)频率和淋巴结清扫的效果。方法回顾性分析882例行全肠系膜切除伴侧淋巴结清扫术的直肠腺癌患者。肿瘤按原发部位分为Ra(从S2下缘到腹膜反射,n = 95)、Rb(从腹膜反射到肛管上缘,n = 713)、P(肛管,n = 74)。在每个站点评估LNM率和解剖效果。治疗价值指数(TVI)计算为LNM率乘以5年总生存率。结果LNM 447例(50.7%)。位于口腔的肿瘤的肠系膜LNM率和TVI更高(Ra为49.5%和43,Rb为46.1%和29.7,P为43.2%和17.6),而位于肛门的肿瘤的外侧LNM率和TVI更高(Ra为7.4%和3.7,Rb为16.3%和8,P为29.7%和14.1)。无论肿瘤位置如何,外侧区域的TVI在髂内远端和闭孔区域均较高。结论肿瘤部位影响直肠癌LNM频率及淋巴结清扫效果。治疗策略应根据肿瘤部位进行个体化,以改善预后。
{"title":"Impact of Tumor Location on the Efficacy of Lateral and Mesenteric Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated by Upfront Surgery","authors":"Tomofumi Uotani,&nbsp;Hiroshi Nagata,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Takamizawa,&nbsp;Konosuke Moritani,&nbsp;Shunsuke Tsukamoto,&nbsp;Tsutomu Fujii,&nbsp;Yukihide Kanemitsu","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The relationship between tumor location and lymphatic flow is generally known to affect the efficacy of lymph node dissection, but the specific impact in rectal cancer remains unclear. This study investigated the frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and the efficacy of lymph node dissection based on tumor location.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively investigated 882 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection. Tumors were categorized by primary site into Ra (from the lower edge of S2 to the peritoneal reflection, <i>n</i> = 95), Rb (from the peritoneal reflection to the upper edge of the anal canal, <i>n</i> = 713), and P (anal canal, <i>n</i> = 74). LNM rates and dissection efficacy were assessed at each station. The therapeutic value index (TVI) was calculated as the LNM rate multiplied by the 5-year overall survival rate.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>LNM was observed in 447 patients (50.7%). Mesenteric LNM rates and the TVI were higher for tumors located more orally (49.5% and 43 for Ra, 46.1% and 29.7 for Rb, 43.2% and 17.6 for P), whereas lateral LNM rates and the TVI were higher for tumors located more anally (7.4% and 3.7 for Ra, 16.3% and 8 for Rb, 29.7% and 14.1 for P). Regardless of tumor location, the TVI in the lateral region was high in the distal internal iliac and obturator areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Tumor location influences LNM frequency and lymph node dissection efficacy in rectal cancer. Treatment strategies should be individualized based on tumor location to improve outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1233-1242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Results of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Anastomosis for Lower Rectal Cancer Located 4–5 cm From the Anal Verge: A Subanalysis of the Ultimate Study 患者报告的结果和手术结果手工缝合与吻合器吻合位于肛门边缘4-5厘米的下直肠癌:最终研究的亚分析
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70063
Masakatsu Numata, Jun Watanabe, Yuichiro Tsukada, Yusuke Suwa, Yosuke Fukunaga, Yasumitsu Hirano, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Hiroki Hamamoto, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Hisanaga Horie, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Shuntaro Nagai, Madoka Hamada, Shinichi Yoshioka, Shinobu Ohnuma, Tamuro Hayama, Koki Otsuka, Yusuke Inoue, Kazuki Ueda, Yuji Toiyama, Satoshi Maruyama, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Keitaro Tanaka, Takeshi Naitoh, Masahiko Watanabe, Motoko Suzuki, Toshihiro Misumi, Masaaki Ito, Ultimate Trial Group in Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Background

Preserving anorectal function while achieving oncological success is crucial in the treatment of lower rectal cancer near the anal canal. Despite advancements in laparoscopic surgery that facilitate anal preservation, post-operative anorectal dysfunction considerably affects quality of life. Both hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses are suitable options for tumors located 4–5 cm from the anus. However, evidence comparing the functional outcomes and complications associated with both anastomosis methods is lacking.

Methods

This multicenter, single-arm prospective study included patients with cT1-T2/N0/M0 adenocarcinoma located 4–5 cm from the anal verge, scheduled for upfront laparoscopic surgery. Anorectal function, post-operative complications, urinary and male sexual function, and oncological outcomes were assessed using the validated scores.

Results

A total of 135 patients were analyzed and divided into hand-sewn (n = 65) and stapled (n = 70) groups. The patient characteristics were similar, except for the tumors in the hand-sewn group located 1 mm closer to the anal verge. No significant differences were observed in the post-operative complications. Anorectal function, measured using Wexner scores, worsened at 3 months postoperatively and gradually improved in both groups. At 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, the stapled group consistently showed better Wexner scores than the hand-sewn group. Urinary function, sexual function, and oncological outcomes were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Stapled anastomosis may provide better anorectal function with comparable safety and oncological outcomes to hand-sewn anastomosis. Therefore, stapled anastomosis may be preferred for tumors located 4–5 cm from the anal verge to ensure oncological safety.

Trial Registration

This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System (UMIN 000011750)

背景:在取得肿瘤成功的同时保持肛门直肠功能是肛管附近下段直肠癌治疗的关键。尽管腹腔镜手术在促进肛门保存方面取得了进步,但术后肛肠功能障碍仍严重影响生活质量。对于距离肛门4-5厘米的肿瘤,手工缝合和吻合器都是合适的选择。然而,比较两种吻合方法的功能结局和并发症的证据缺乏。方法本研究是一项多中心、单臂前瞻性研究,纳入了位于肛门边缘4-5 cm的cT1-T2/N0/M0腺癌患者,计划进行腹腔镜手术。肛肠功能、术后并发症、泌尿和男性性功能以及肿瘤预后使用验证分数进行评估。结果共分析135例患者,分为手工缝合组(n = 65)和缝合组(n = 70)。除手工缝合组肿瘤位于肛门边缘近1mm处外,其他患者特征相似。两组术后并发症无明显差异。使用Wexner评分测量的肛肠功能在术后3个月恶化,并逐渐改善。在3、6、12、24和36个月时,缝合组的Wexner评分始终高于手工缝合组。两组患者的泌尿功能、性功能和肿瘤预后相似。结论吻合器吻合术可提供更好的肛肠功能,安全性和肿瘤预后与手缝吻合术相当。因此,对于距离肛缘4 ~ 5 cm的肿瘤,为保证肿瘤的安全性,可选择吻合器吻合。本研究已在UMIN临床试验注册系统中注册(UMIN 000011750)。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Results of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Anastomosis for Lower Rectal Cancer Located 4–5 cm From the Anal Verge: A Subanalysis of the Ultimate Study","authors":"Masakatsu Numata,&nbsp;Jun Watanabe,&nbsp;Yuichiro Tsukada,&nbsp;Yusuke Suwa,&nbsp;Yosuke Fukunaga,&nbsp;Yasumitsu Hirano,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Sakamoto,&nbsp;Hiroki Hamamoto,&nbsp;Masanori Yoshimitsu,&nbsp;Hisanaga Horie,&nbsp;Nobuhisa Matsuhashi,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Kuriu,&nbsp;Shuntaro Nagai,&nbsp;Madoka Hamada,&nbsp;Shinichi Yoshioka,&nbsp;Shinobu Ohnuma,&nbsp;Tamuro Hayama,&nbsp;Koki Otsuka,&nbsp;Yusuke Inoue,&nbsp;Kazuki Ueda,&nbsp;Yuji Toiyama,&nbsp;Satoshi Maruyama,&nbsp;Shigeki Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Keitaro Tanaka,&nbsp;Takeshi Naitoh,&nbsp;Masahiko Watanabe,&nbsp;Motoko Suzuki,&nbsp;Toshihiro Misumi,&nbsp;Masaaki Ito,&nbsp;Ultimate Trial Group in Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Preserving anorectal function while achieving oncological success is crucial in the treatment of lower rectal cancer near the anal canal. Despite advancements in laparoscopic surgery that facilitate anal preservation, post-operative anorectal dysfunction considerably affects quality of life. Both hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses are suitable options for tumors located 4–5 cm from the anus. However, evidence comparing the functional outcomes and complications associated with both anastomosis methods is lacking.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This multicenter, single-arm prospective study included patients with cT1-T2/N0/M0 adenocarcinoma located 4–5 cm from the anal verge, scheduled for upfront laparoscopic surgery. Anorectal function, post-operative complications, urinary and male sexual function, and oncological outcomes were assessed using the validated scores.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 135 patients were analyzed and divided into hand-sewn (<i>n</i> = 65) and stapled (<i>n</i> = 70) groups. The patient characteristics were similar, except for the tumors in the hand-sewn group located 1 mm closer to the anal verge. No significant differences were observed in the post-operative complications. Anorectal function, measured using Wexner scores, worsened at 3 months postoperatively and gradually improved in both groups. At 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, the stapled group consistently showed better Wexner scores than the hand-sewn group. Urinary function, sexual function, and oncological outcomes were similar in both groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Stapled anastomosis may provide better anorectal function with comparable safety and oncological outcomes to hand-sewn anastomosis. Therefore, stapled anastomosis may be preferred for tumors located 4–5 cm from the anal verge to ensure oncological safety.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System (UMIN 000011750)</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1215-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70063","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence-Guided Total Mesorectal Excision: Development of a Deep Learning Model to Identify the Pelvic Fascial Plane Anatomy 人工智能引导的全肠系膜切除术:一种识别骨盆筋膜平面解剖结构的深度学习模型的发展
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70064
Yuta Suzuki, Daichi Kitaguchi, Norihito Kosugi, Hiro Hasegawa, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Yusuke Kinugasa, Masaaki Ito

Aim

Total mesorectal excision entails dissection of the “holy plane” without damaging the mesorectal and parietal pelvic fasciae. We aimed to train a deep learning model to identify the anatomical landmarks of the pelvic fascial surface during total mesorectal excision and evaluate its performance to validate artificial intelligence-guided total mesorectal excision.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, a deep learning model that can automatically identify the anatomical landmarks in the pelvic fascial plane during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in real time was developed. Target anatomical landmarks included the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and the holy plane between them. Feature Pyramid Networks and EfficientNetB7 were adopted as the neural network architecture and backbone network, respectively. The surgical videos used for training and validation data were different. The Dice Similarity Coefficient, recall, and Normalized Surface Dice, which were calculated using five-fold cross-validation, were used as the evaluation metrics.

Results

Overall, 2861 images from 157 surgical videos were annotated and used for the training and validation datasets. In the semantic segmentation task, the Dice Similarity Coefficients for the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and holy plane were 90.4%, 90.6%, and 68.5%, respectively. The Normalized Surface Dices for the three fasciae were 70.4%, 73.2%, and 54.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

We constructed a deep learning model that recognizes three regions for total mesorectal excision—the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and intervening holy plane—with a relatively high Dice Similarity Coefficient, successfully providing proof of concept for artificial intelligence-guided total mesorectal excision.

目的全肠系膜切除需要在不损伤肠系膜和骨盆壁筋膜的情况下剥离“神圣面”。我们的目的是训练一个深度学习模型来识别全肠系膜切除术期间盆腔筋膜表面的解剖标志,并评估其性能,以验证人工智能引导的全肠系膜切除术。方法在单中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,建立了一种能够实时自动识别腹腔镜全肠系膜切除术中盆腔筋膜平面解剖标志的深度学习模型。目标解剖标志包括直肠系膜筋膜、盆壁筋膜及两者之间的神圣面。神经网络架构采用Feature Pyramid Networks,骨干网采用EfficientNetB7。用于训练和验证数据的手术视频不同。使用五重交叉验证计算的骰子相似系数,召回率和归一化表面骰子作为评估指标。结果共对157个手术视频中的2861幅图像进行了注释,并用于训练和验证数据集。在语义分割任务中,直肠系膜筋膜、骨盆壁筋膜和神圣平面的Dice相似系数分别为90.4%、90.6%和68.5%。三种筋膜的归一化表面率分别为70.4%、73.2%和54.6%。我们构建了一个深度学习模型,该模型识别了直肠系膜筋膜、骨盆壁筋膜和介入holy plane三个区域,具有较高的Dice相似系数,成功地为人工智能引导下的直肠系膜全切除术提供了概念证明。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Guided Total Mesorectal Excision: Development of a Deep Learning Model to Identify the Pelvic Fascial Plane Anatomy","authors":"Yuta Suzuki,&nbsp;Daichi Kitaguchi,&nbsp;Norihito Kosugi,&nbsp;Hiro Hasegawa,&nbsp;Nobuyoshi Takeshita,&nbsp;Yusuke Kinugasa,&nbsp;Masaaki Ito","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70064","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Total mesorectal excision entails dissection of the “holy plane” without damaging the mesorectal and parietal pelvic fasciae. We aimed to train a deep learning model to identify the anatomical landmarks of the pelvic fascial surface during total mesorectal excision and evaluate its performance to validate artificial intelligence-guided total mesorectal excision.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, a deep learning model that can automatically identify the anatomical landmarks in the pelvic fascial plane during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in real time was developed. Target anatomical landmarks included the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and the holy plane between them. Feature Pyramid Networks and EfficientNetB7 were adopted as the neural network architecture and backbone network, respectively. The surgical videos used for training and validation data were different. The Dice Similarity Coefficient, recall, and Normalized Surface Dice, which were calculated using five-fold cross-validation, were used as the evaluation metrics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, 2861 images from 157 surgical videos were annotated and used for the training and validation datasets. In the semantic segmentation task, the Dice Similarity Coefficients for the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and holy plane were 90.4%, 90.6%, and 68.5%, respectively. The Normalized Surface Dices for the three fasciae were 70.4%, 73.2%, and 54.6%, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We constructed a deep learning model that recognizes three regions for total mesorectal excision—the mesorectal fascia, parietal pelvic fascia, and intervening holy plane—with a relatively high Dice Similarity Coefficient, successfully providing proof of concept for artificial intelligence-guided total mesorectal excision.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1225-1232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70064","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clarifying Treatment Compliance and Future Directions in Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases 明确可切除结肠肝转移瘤围手术期化疗的治疗依从性和未来方向
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70062
Masayuki Okuno, Hiroto Nishino, Takamichi Ishii, Etsuro Hatano
<p>We read with great interest the recent article by Takakura et al. [<span>1</span>], reporting results from a multi-institutional phase II study (HiSCO-01) comparing treatment compliance rates (TCR)—defined as the completion of ≥ 6 cycles of CAPOX plus bevacizumab (CAPOX-Bev) and R0 resection—between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although designed as the phase II portion of a planned sequential phase II/III trial, the study did not proceed to phase III due to slow patient accrual.</p><p>The study found TCRs of 89.2% and 71.8% in the pre- and postoperative groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.06), with both exceeding the expected threshold of 70%. We would appreciate clarification on whether this trend favoring the preoperative group was considered a positive outcome, and how the authors intended to proceed with the phase III portion when patient enrollment continued as expected.</p><p>The optimal regimen for perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable CRLM remains a subject of debate in the era of molecular-targeted therapies. The EORTC 40983 trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) with perioperative FOLFOX4; however, it did not incorporate molecular-targeted agents [<span>2</span>]. Similarly, prior studies suggesting improved PFS with adjuvant chemotherapy following hepatectomy also lacked the use of targeted therapies [<span>3, 4</span>]. In addition, important biomarkers—such as RAS and BRAF mutation status, microsatellite instability, and tumor sidedness—were not analyzed in the current trial, although they are now crucial for selecting appropriate targeted therapies. In this context, we are particularly interested in which regimen the authors would select for a future phase III trial based on the same concept, taking into account current molecular profiling strategies. Our proposed regimens are FOLFOX or CAPOX plus a molecular-targeted agent (selected on the basis of RAS/BRAF status and primary-tumor sidedness) for preoperative chemotherapy, and FOLFOX or CAPOX without a molecular-targeted agent for postoperative chemotherapy.</p><p>A major concern regarding postoperative chemotherapy, particularly after major hepatectomy, is increased toxicity, which may lead to reduced dose intensity and early termination of treatment. One possible rationale behind this study's design was the hypothesis that preoperative chemotherapy would be less toxic than postoperative treatment. Although the authors concluded that preoperative CAPOX-Bev was less toxic, the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities, relative dose intensity, and postoperative complications were reportedly similar between the two groups. Therefore, the reason for the lower TCR in the postoperative group remains unclear. One possible explanation may lie in physician inexperience with CAPOX-Bev at the time of study initiation in 2010. For example, in the JCOG0603 trial, the treat
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Takakura等人最近发表的一篇文章,报告了一项多机构II期研究(HiSCO-01)的结果,比较了可切除的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者术前和术后化疗的治疗依从率(TCR) -定义为完成CAPOX +贝伐单抗(CAPOX- bev)和R0切除的≥6个周期。虽然设计为计划的顺序II/III期试验的II期部分,但由于患者累积缓慢,该研究没有进入III期。研究发现术前组tcr为89.2%,术后组tcr为71.8% (p = 0.06),均超过预期阈值70%。我们希望澄清这一倾向于术前组的趋势是否被认为是一个积极的结果,以及当患者按计划继续入组时,作者打算如何继续进行III期研究。在分子靶向治疗时代,可切除的CRLM患者围手术期化疗的最佳方案仍然是一个有争议的话题。EORTC 40983试验显示围手术期FOLFOX4改善了无进展生存期(PFS);然而,它没有纳入分子靶向药物[2]。同样,先前的研究表明肝切除术后通过辅助化疗改善PFS,但也缺乏靶向治疗的使用[3,4]。此外,重要的生物标志物,如RAS和BRAF突变状态、微卫星不稳定性和肿瘤侧边性,在目前的试验中没有分析,尽管它们现在对选择合适的靶向治疗至关重要。在这种情况下,我们特别感兴趣的是,考虑到当前的分子谱分析策略,作者将在基于相同概念的未来III期试验中选择哪种方案。我们提出的方案是术前化疗采用FOLFOX或CAPOX加分子靶向药物(根据RAS/BRAF状态和原发肿瘤侧性选择),术后化疗采用FOLFOX或CAPOX不加分子靶向药物。术后化疗,特别是大肝切除术后化疗的一个主要问题是毒性增加,这可能导致剂量强度降低和治疗的早期终止。这项研究设计的一个可能的基本原理是假设术前化疗的毒性比术后治疗小。尽管作者得出结论,术前CAPOX-Bev毒性较小,但据报道,两组化疗相关毒性、相对剂量强度和术后并发症的发生率相似。因此,术后组TCR较低的原因尚不清楚。一种可能的解释可能是在2010年研究开始时,医生对CAPOX-Bev缺乏经验。例如,在JCOG0603试验中,初始II期队列(2007-2009)的治疗完成率不超过36%,而随后的队列bbb的治疗完成率为61%。由于肝大部切除术后肝功能和整体身体状况会受到损害,与术前治疗相比,有限的CAPOX-Bev医生经验可能对术后化疗耐受性产生更大的影响。考虑到可切除的CRLM的围手术期化疗管理仍在争论中——关于最佳时间(术前与术后)、方案选择、分子靶向药物的结合、治疗时间、PFS和总生存期(OS)之间的脱节,以及OS的真正益处——本研究的发现为正在进行的讨论提供了有价值的见解。此外,正在进行的多机构随机III期PERSEUS试验(jRCTs031230683)正在比较围手术期化疗加手术与术前手术后辅助化疗对可切除的CRLM患者的影响。本研究旨在确定围手术期化疗是否比单纯辅助化疗提供更好的PFS(主要终点)。该试验的结果有望为这一领域提供进一步的有价值的证据。大野正之:概念、方法论、调查、写作—初稿、写作—审校与编辑。西野博人:构思、写作—初稿、写作—审稿、编辑。石井隆道:写作-原稿,写作-审稿编辑,监督。初野悦郎:写作-初稿,写作-审查和编辑,项目管理,监督,构思。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Clarifying Treatment Compliance and Future Directions in Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases","authors":"Masayuki Okuno,&nbsp;Hiroto Nishino,&nbsp;Takamichi Ishii,&nbsp;Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70062","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We read with great interest the recent article by Takakura et al. [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], reporting results from a multi-institutional phase II study (HiSCO-01) comparing treatment compliance rates (TCR)—defined as the completion of ≥ 6 cycles of CAPOX plus bevacizumab (CAPOX-Bev) and R0 resection—between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although designed as the phase II portion of a planned sequential phase II/III trial, the study did not proceed to phase III due to slow patient accrual.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study found TCRs of 89.2% and 71.8% in the pre- and postoperative groups, respectively (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.06), with both exceeding the expected threshold of 70%. We would appreciate clarification on whether this trend favoring the preoperative group was considered a positive outcome, and how the authors intended to proceed with the phase III portion when patient enrollment continued as expected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The optimal regimen for perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable CRLM remains a subject of debate in the era of molecular-targeted therapies. The EORTC 40983 trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) with perioperative FOLFOX4; however, it did not incorporate molecular-targeted agents [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Similarly, prior studies suggesting improved PFS with adjuvant chemotherapy following hepatectomy also lacked the use of targeted therapies [&lt;span&gt;3, 4&lt;/span&gt;]. In addition, important biomarkers—such as RAS and BRAF mutation status, microsatellite instability, and tumor sidedness—were not analyzed in the current trial, although they are now crucial for selecting appropriate targeted therapies. In this context, we are particularly interested in which regimen the authors would select for a future phase III trial based on the same concept, taking into account current molecular profiling strategies. Our proposed regimens are FOLFOX or CAPOX plus a molecular-targeted agent (selected on the basis of RAS/BRAF status and primary-tumor sidedness) for preoperative chemotherapy, and FOLFOX or CAPOX without a molecular-targeted agent for postoperative chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A major concern regarding postoperative chemotherapy, particularly after major hepatectomy, is increased toxicity, which may lead to reduced dose intensity and early termination of treatment. One possible rationale behind this study's design was the hypothesis that preoperative chemotherapy would be less toxic than postoperative treatment. Although the authors concluded that preoperative CAPOX-Bev was less toxic, the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities, relative dose intensity, and postoperative complications were reportedly similar between the two groups. Therefore, the reason for the lower TCR in the postoperative group remains unclear. One possible explanation may lie in physician inexperience with CAPOX-Bev at the time of study initiation in 2010. For example, in the JCOG0603 trial, the treat","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1369-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70062","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between Cholecystectomy and Gastric Cancer in a Cohort Study in Taiwan 胆囊切除术与胃癌的关系:台湾一项队列研究
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70061
Kuan-Fu Liao, Cheng-Chan Yu, Sheng-Chun Chiu, Yu-Hung Kuo, Shih-Wei Lai

Objective

The association between cholecystectomy and gastric cancer is undetermined. The objective of this study was to assess whether subjects with cholecystectomy are at risk of gastric cancer in Taiwan.

Methods

This study used data from a cohort of 2 000 000 beneficiaries over a twelve-year period (2010–2021) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 24 798 subjects aged 20 to 84 years underwent cholecystectomy, constituting the cholecystectomy group. An additional 68 781 randomly selected subjects without a history of cholecystectomy were included as the noncholecystectomy group. The incidence of gastric cancer was measured in both groups through the end of 2021. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of gastric cancer, adjusting for covariables.

Results

The overall incidence rate of gastric cancer was 1.02 times higher in the cholecystectomy group than in the noncholecystectomy group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (5.70 vs. 5.60 per 10 000 person-years, 95% CI = 0.80–1.31, p = 0.880). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the adjusted HR for gastric cancer in the cholecystectomy group compared to the noncholecystectomy group was 1.06, which was not statistically significant (95% CI = 0.83–1.36, p = 0.636).

Conclusion

This cohort study does not detect a significant association between cholecystectomy and gastric cancer risk.

目的胆囊切除术与胃癌的关系尚不明确。本研究的目的是评估台湾胆囊切除术患者是否有胃癌的风险。​24 798例20 ~ 84岁的患者行胆囊切除术,构成胆囊切除术组。另外随机选择68781名无胆囊切除术史的受试者作为非胆囊切除术组。到2021年底,两组的胃癌发病率都进行了测量。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型评估胃癌风险的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),并对协变量进行调整。结果胆囊切除术组胃癌总发病率是非胆囊切除术组的1.02倍;然而,这种差异没有统计学意义(5.70 vs 5.60 / 10000人-年,95% CI = 0.80-1.31, p = 0.880)。多变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,胆囊切除术组与非胆囊切除术组胃癌的校正HR为1.06,差异无统计学意义(95% CI = 0.83-1.36, p = 0.636)。结论:本队列研究未发现胆囊切除术与胃癌风险之间的显著关联。
{"title":"Association Between Cholecystectomy and Gastric Cancer in a Cohort Study in Taiwan","authors":"Kuan-Fu Liao,&nbsp;Cheng-Chan Yu,&nbsp;Sheng-Chun Chiu,&nbsp;Yu-Hung Kuo,&nbsp;Shih-Wei Lai","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The association between cholecystectomy and gastric cancer is undetermined. The objective of this study was to assess whether subjects with cholecystectomy are at risk of gastric cancer in Taiwan.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study used data from a cohort of 2 000 000 beneficiaries over a twelve-year period (2010–2021) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 24 798 subjects aged 20 to 84 years underwent cholecystectomy, constituting the cholecystectomy group. An additional 68 781 randomly selected subjects without a history of cholecystectomy were included as the noncholecystectomy group. The incidence of gastric cancer was measured in both groups through the end of 2021. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of gastric cancer, adjusting for covariables.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The overall incidence rate of gastric cancer was 1.02 times higher in the cholecystectomy group than in the noncholecystectomy group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (5.70 vs. 5.60 per 10 000 person-years, 95% CI = 0.80–1.31, <i>p</i> = 0.880). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the adjusted HR for gastric cancer in the cholecystectomy group compared to the noncholecystectomy group was 1.06, which was not statistically significant (95% CI = 0.83–1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.636).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This cohort study does not detect a significant association between cholecystectomy and gastric cancer risk.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1207-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic Significance of GLIM-Defined Malnutrition in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Following Upfront Surgery 可切除胰腺癌患者术前营养不良对预后的影响
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70059
Takuya Mizumoto, Yoshihide Nanno, Jun Ishida, Dongha Lee, Kenji Fukushima, Shohei Komatsu, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Sadaki Asari, Masahiro Kido, Takumi Fukumoto

Aim

Regarding the resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), not only anatomical factors but also biological and conditional factors have come to be considered. This study examined the impact of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria on prognosis after resection of anatomically resectable PDAC.

Methods

The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent resection for resectable PDAC between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified as normal, moderately, or severely malnourished according to the GLIM criteria.

Results

In total, 194 patients were included in the analysis. According to the GLIM criteria, 61 (31.4%), 49 (25.2%), and 84 (42.3%) patients were normal, moderately, and severely malnourished, respectively. Patients with malnutrition had shorter overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (OS, RFS, and DSS) than normal patients (OS, normal vs. moderate, p = 0.015; normal vs. severe, p < 0.001; RFS, normal vs. moderate p = 0.012, normal vs. severe, p < 0.001; DSS, normal vs. moderate, p = 0.023; normal vs. severe, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis regarding OS using all factors, moderate or severe malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria (p = 0.007), performance status (p = 0.086), preoperative diabetes (p = 0.017), tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm (p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), and postoperative adjuvant therapy (p = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis using preoperative factors, malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria remained a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

The GLIM criteria are effective prognostic predictors in patients with resectable PDAC undergoing upfront surgery. Preoperative nutritional assessment using these criteria may contribute to determining treatment plans for resectable PDAC.

目的考虑胰腺腺癌的可切除性,不仅要考虑解剖学因素,而且要考虑生物学因素和条件因素。本研究考察了全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准对解剖切除PDAC术后预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2022年12月31日连续行PDAC切除术患者的病历。根据GLIM标准,将患者分为正常、中度和严重营养不良。结果共纳入194例患者。根据GLIM标准,61例(31.4%)、49例(25.2%)和84例(42.3%)患者分别为正常、中度和重度营养不良。营养不良患者的总体、无复发和疾病特异性生存期(OS、RFS和DSS)比正常患者短(OS,正常vs中度,p = 0.015;正常vs重度,p < 0.001; RFS,正常vs中度p = 0.012,正常vs重度,p < 0.001; DSS,正常vs中度,p = 0.023;正常vs重度,p < 0.001)。在综合所有因素的OS多因素分析中,GLIM标准的中度或重度营养不良(p = 0.007)、运动状态(p = 0.086)、术前糖尿病(p = 0.017)、肿瘤直径≥3cm (p = 0.002)、淋巴结转移(p < 0.001)和术后辅助治疗(p = 0.027)是独立的预后因素。在术前因素的多变量分析中,根据GLIM标准的营养不良仍然是一个重要的预后因素(p = 0.003)。结论GLIM标准是可切除PDAC患者术前预后的有效预测指标。使用这些标准进行术前营养评估可能有助于确定可切除PDAC的治疗计划。
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of GLIM-Defined Malnutrition in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Following Upfront Surgery","authors":"Takuya Mizumoto,&nbsp;Yoshihide Nanno,&nbsp;Jun Ishida,&nbsp;Dongha Lee,&nbsp;Kenji Fukushima,&nbsp;Shohei Komatsu,&nbsp;Hiroaki Yanagimoto,&nbsp;Sadaki Asari,&nbsp;Masahiro Kido,&nbsp;Takumi Fukumoto","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70059","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Regarding the resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), not only anatomical factors but also biological and conditional factors have come to be considered. This study examined the impact of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria on prognosis after resection of anatomically resectable PDAC.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent resection for resectable PDAC between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified as normal, moderately, or severely malnourished according to the GLIM criteria.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In total, 194 patients were included in the analysis. According to the GLIM criteria, 61 (31.4%), 49 (25.2%), and 84 (42.3%) patients were normal, moderately, and severely malnourished, respectively. Patients with malnutrition had shorter overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (OS, RFS, and DSS) than normal patients (OS, normal vs. moderate, <i>p</i> = 0.015; normal vs. severe, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; RFS, normal vs. moderate <i>p</i> = 0.012, normal vs. severe, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; DSS, normal vs. moderate, <i>p</i> = 0.023; normal vs. severe, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In multivariate analysis regarding OS using all factors, moderate or severe malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria (<i>p</i> = 0.007), performance status (<i>p</i> = 0.086), preoperative diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.017), tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and postoperative adjuvant therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis using preoperative factors, malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria remained a significant prognostic factor (<i>p</i> = 0.003).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The GLIM criteria are effective prognostic predictors in patients with resectable PDAC undergoing upfront surgery. Preoperative nutritional assessment using these criteria may contribute to determining treatment plans for resectable PDAC.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1351-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Volume on Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Analysis of 8782 Patients From the Japanese National Clinical Database 术中液量对微创食管切除术后并发症的影响:来自日本国家临床数据库8782例患者的分析
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70060
Akihiko Okamura, Hideki Endo, Masayuki Watanabe, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Naoki Yoshimura, Hideki Ueno, Masayuki Chida, Ken Shirabe

Background

Excess intraoperative fluid can increase postoperative complications in elective surgery, but data on esophageal cancer surgery remain limited. We examined the relationship between intraoperative fluid volume and short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Methods

This study analyzed 8782 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between 2018 and 2022 using data from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression and smoothing spline models were used to assess associations between intraoperative fluid volume and short-term outcomes.

Results

The median intraoperative fluid volume was 3700 mL (3000–4500) or 7.8 mL/kg/h (6.2–9.7). Postoperatively, pneumonia occurred in 13.6% of patients, anastomotic leakage in 13.1%, prolonged ventilation (> 48 h) in 3.5%, and surgery-related mortality in 0.8%. Patients were classified into tertiles (low, middle, high) based on fluid volume. A high intraoperative fluid volume was significantly associated with pneumonia (risk-adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.45, p = 0.02). However, there was no significant association with anastomotic leakage, prolonged ventilation, or surgery-related mortality. Smoothing spline model showed a positive monotonic relationship between fluid volume and the risk-adjusted odds ratio for pneumonia, prolonged ventilation, and surgery-related mortality, whereas anastomotic leakage showed a negative monotonic trend.

Conclusions

Higher intraoperative fluid volume was significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumonia after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

背景:术中液体过量可增加择期手术的术后并发症,但有关食管癌手术的数据仍然有限。我们研究了微创食管切除术后术中液体量与短期预后的关系。方法本研究使用日本国家临床数据库的数据,分析了2018年至2022年期间接受微创食管切除术的8782例患者。多变量logistic回归和平滑样条模型用于评估术中液体量与短期预后之间的关系。结果术中液量中位数为3700 mL(3000 ~ 4500)或7.8 mL/kg/h(6.2 ~ 9.7)。术后,13.6%的患者发生肺炎,13.1%的患者发生吻合口漏,3.5%的患者发生延长通气(48小时),手术相关死亡率为0.8%。根据体液量将患者分为低、中、高三类。术中大量液体与肺炎显著相关(风险校正优势比1.22,95%可信区间1.04-1.45,p = 0.02)。然而,与吻合口漏、延长通气时间或手术相关死亡率无显著相关性。平滑样条模型显示液体体积与肺炎、延长通气时间和手术相关死亡率的风险调整优势比呈正单调关系,而吻合口漏呈负单调趋势。结论术中液量增高与微创食管切除术后肺炎风险增高显著相关。
{"title":"Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Volume on Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Analysis of 8782 Patients From the Japanese National Clinical Database","authors":"Akihiko Okamura,&nbsp;Hideki Endo,&nbsp;Masayuki Watanabe,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Kikuchi,&nbsp;Naoki Yoshimura,&nbsp;Hideki Ueno,&nbsp;Masayuki Chida,&nbsp;Ken Shirabe","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Excess intraoperative fluid can increase postoperative complications in elective surgery, but data on esophageal cancer surgery remain limited. We examined the relationship between intraoperative fluid volume and short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study analyzed 8782 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between 2018 and 2022 using data from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression and smoothing spline models were used to assess associations between intraoperative fluid volume and short-term outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The median intraoperative fluid volume was 3700 mL (3000–4500) or 7.8 mL/kg/h (6.2–9.7). Postoperatively, pneumonia occurred in 13.6% of patients, anastomotic leakage in 13.1%, prolonged ventilation (&gt; 48 h) in 3.5%, and surgery-related mortality in 0.8%. Patients were classified into tertiles (low, middle, high) based on fluid volume. A high intraoperative fluid volume was significantly associated with pneumonia (risk-adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.45, <i>p</i> = 0.02). However, there was no significant association with anastomotic leakage, prolonged ventilation, or surgery-related mortality. Smoothing spline model showed a positive monotonic relationship between fluid volume and the risk-adjusted odds ratio for pneumonia, prolonged ventilation, and surgery-related mortality, whereas anastomotic leakage showed a negative monotonic trend.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Higher intraoperative fluid volume was significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumonia after minimally invasive esophagectomy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1199-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1