首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
New National Network of Experts (Japan Pelvic Exenteration Network: J-PEN) Formed in a Bid to Improve Outcomes of Pelvic Exenteration in Japan 新的国家专家网络(日本盆腔切除网络:J-PEN)成立,旨在改善日本盆腔切除的结果
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70050
Hideaki Yano, Alex Mirnezami, Masataka Ikeda, Kay Uehara, Shuichiro Matoba, Yuichiro Tsukada, Toshiki Mukai, Kei Kimura, Yudai Fukui, Naoyuki Toyota

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical and extreme surgical procedure for en bloc removal of pelvic organs and tissues contiguously involved by cancer. PE has long been the mainstay, and often the only option to potentially provide cure, or long term control, in the management of patients with locally advanced and recurrent abdomino-pelvic malignancies. The concept focusses on attaining an R0 cancer resection margin (most commonly defined as ≥ 1 mm), by surgically removing margin-involved or margin-threatened organs and structures, as this is consistently demonstrated as the most important predictor of outcome [1]. Naturally, however, such radicality comes with significant risks of complications; of loss of function and quality of life; as well as substantial healthcare resource utilisation and health economic impact. Consequently, the deployment of PE as a surgical solution has in the past been correctly cautious, but at times also overly pessimistic, informed by historically poor outcomes.

In more recent times, the PE landscape has undergone a paradigm shift. Incremental developments in multiple disciplines have helped pave the way for substantially improved outcomes in carefully selected patients. These include but are not limited to advances in diagnostic radiology; oncology; anaesthesia and peri-operative medicine; intensive care; surgical devices and techniques; understanding of the pelvic anatomy; management and control of haemorrhage; reconstructive options; and interventional radiology [2]. As a result, the field of PE has evolved, with broadening indications and applications, and greater radicality, manifested by the fact that pelvic bones are increasingly resected as one of the most outermost tissues in a margin of concern, and reflecting the “higher and wider” approaches achievable [3].

The increasing application of PE has also emphasised some of the glaring unmet needs in the field. Examples of these are highlighted below but are not exhaustive. A lack of standardisation and differing protocols in MRI imaging techniques is one such unmet need. Poorly designed multidisciplinary team (MDT) models for the discussion of some of the most complex and heavily pre-treated patients an MDT may receive is another such unmet need. A further concern has been in the use of surgical terminology. Contemporary PE represents an umbrella term that in the modern era encompasses a diversity of resections, and to date a confusing array of terminology has been used to describe the different surgical interventions possible. Pathological handling of specimens, for example the method of specimen orientation and marking, the number of sections taken, and management of specimens with bone, is a further area of unmet need requiring a standardisation of reporting and minimum pathological datasets. Nevertheless to date no formal international system has been described. Importantly, as a result of the lack

盆腔切除术(PE)是一种根治性和极端的外科手术,用于整体切除盆腔器官和连续受累的癌症组织。长期以来,PE一直是治疗局部晚期和复发性腹部-盆腔恶性肿瘤的主要方法,而且往往是唯一可能提供治愈或长期控制的选择。该概念的重点是通过手术切除边缘受损伤或边缘受威胁的器官和结构来获得R0肿瘤切除边缘(最常见的定义为≥1mm),因为这一直被证明是预后[1]最重要的预测因素。然而,这种激进性自然伴随着并发症的重大风险;丧失功能和生活质量;以及大量的医疗资源利用和卫生经济影响。因此,在过去,PE作为手术解决方案的部署是正确的谨慎,但有时也过于悲观,因为历史上预后不佳。近年来,私募股权领域经历了范式转变。多学科的渐进式发展为精心挑选的患者的显著改善结果铺平了道路。这些包括但不限于诊断放射学的进步;肿瘤;麻醉与围手术期医学;重症监护;手术器械和技术;了解骨盆解剖;出血的管理和控制;重建选项;介入放射学b[2]。因此,PE领域已经发展,适应症和应用范围越来越广,更激进,骨盆骨作为最外层的组织之一被越来越多地切除,反映了“更高更广”的方法可以实现[10]。越来越多的PE应用也强调了该领域一些明显的未满足需求。下面列出了这些例子,但并不详尽。MRI成像技术缺乏标准化和不同的协议是这样一个未满足的需求。设计不良的多学科团队(MDT)模型,用于讨论MDT可能接受的一些最复杂和大量预处理的患者,这是另一个未满足的需求。另一个值得关注的问题是外科术语的使用。当代PE代表了一个总括性的术语,在现代包含了各种各样的切除,迄今为止,人们已经使用了一系列令人困惑的术语来描述可能的不同手术干预。标本的病理处理,例如标本定位和标记的方法、所取切片的数量以及带骨标本的管理,是需要标准化报告和最小病理数据集的另一个未满足需求的领域。然而,迄今为止还没有正式的国际制度。重要的是,由于缺乏这样的放射学、外科和病理学的标准化和定义以及质量保证,高质量的研究在PE领域停滞不前,阻碍了该领域的创新和进一步发展。另一个未满足的需求是缺乏一个合适的论坛来讨论通常涉及PE的医学专业,如泌尿外科、血管外科、骨科和整形外科;麻醉师;护士专家;和肿瘤学家。这样一个论坛将促进交流、思想交流和传播最佳做法,并再次有助于推动这一领域的发展。最后,另一个未得到满足的需求是缺乏在实地教育和培训下一代的机会。为了克服这些普遍挑战,国家和国际一级的合作至关重要。为了协助实现这一目标,已经建立了几个网络,其中最著名的是国际PelvEx协作组和英国范围内的PE网络UKPEN。PelvEx协作组是唯一的全球PE网络,自2018年以来每年举行面对面会议,并为文献论坛贡献了大量出版物。自2019年成立以来,英国笔会一直在通过在线和面对面会议实施积极举措,以满足上述未满足的需求。他们贡献的一个例子就是现在被验证的PE词典,它有助于为复杂的盆腔癌手术创造一种通用的外科语言[2,5]。从日本的角度来看,重要的是要注意日本特有的许多挑战,首先是术语。值得注意的是,日语中不存在与“盆腔切除”一词完全对应的词。通常使用“Kotsuban naizou zenteki”,但在用法或定义上与英语并不完全可互换。此外,也没有类似于“tme以外”或“解剖外切除”等关键术语的对应词。 重要的是,1毫米的切除切缘规则也没有被日本外科肿瘤学界广泛接受或认可。日本PE的治疗背景也与其他国家不同。从历史上看,盆腔侧壁淋巴结切除术或夹层已广泛实施,甚至在预防设置和术前放疗的使用比西方国家更少。在日本,碳离子放疗越来越多地应用于治疗局部复发性直肠癌,其实用性的证据也在不断积累,但目前尚不清楚在PE手术的背景下如何考虑这种独特的方式。此外,通常用于PE缺损重建的生物网格目前在日本还不可用。有趣的是,尽管日本的临床医生和研究人员在20世纪60年代和70年代率先提出了术中电子束放疗(IOERT)和术中腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)等晚期癌症的辅助术中治疗方法,但在日本的PE治疗中很少使用。综上所述,这些因素使得日本的口腔外科医生与彼此以及国际同行有效地沟通和交流知识和经验具有挑战性。在全球不断变化的环境和国内和国际未满足的需求的背景下,日本的盆腔切除专家聚集在伦敦的PelvEx 2024上,受UKPEN的启发,成立了J-PEN(日本盆腔切除网络)。其目的是在日本建立一个网络和结构,为患者、多学科团队专家和所有相关专业服务,并有助于制定跨专业的国家标准和质量保证,促进高质量的研究。日本笔会现在每月举行一次在线会议,并举行英语案例会议,有时邀请国际专家。J-PEN还可以为下一代日本外科医生提供一个用英语进行讨论的平台。日本笔会的首次面对面会议将于2025年6月在东京举行。总之,局部晚期和复发的腹部盆腔癌的手术治疗经历了范式转变,从虚无主义到谨慎乐观主义。根治性拔肠手术越来越适合于精心挑选和非常仔细咨询的患者。PE是一种资源密集型的方式,但如果达到R0,则可以导致良好的生存和良好的生活质量。目前国内和国际上存在几个重要的未满足需求,J-PEN希望通过日本各地的中心和个人网络来解决这些问题。它需要一个团队来执行清除,并且它将需要一个团队的单位来满足这些未满足的需求。J-PEN是关于协作与合作,而不是竞争,以帮助实现单个单位或专业无法单独实现的目标。现代PE在日本乃至国际上都是高风险、超高风险的手术,缺乏高质量的证据,没有明确的日本标准、指南或资金来源,而且在管理审查日益严格的时期,这种现状不能继续下去。我们相信,J-PEN可以为日本的口腔外科医生提供一个独特的平台,分享和加强他们对口腔外科的理解和经验,并通过国内和国际的对话和合作,促进解决该领域未满足的需求。矢野英明:概念化(平等);写作-原稿(同等);项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(同等)。Alex Mirnezami:概念化(平等);写作-原稿(同等);写作-审查和编辑(同等)。池田正孝:项目管理(平等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。Kay Uehara:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。Matoba修一郎:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。津田雄一郎:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。向井俊树:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。木村庆:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。Yudai Fukui:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。丰田直行:项目管理(同等);写作-审查和编辑(辅助)。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。Kay Uehara是《胃肠外科年鉴》的编委会成员。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"New National Network of Experts (Japan Pelvic Exenteration Network: J-PEN) Formed in a Bid to Improve Outcomes of Pelvic Exenteration in Japan","authors":"Hideaki Yano,&nbsp;Alex Mirnezami,&nbsp;Masataka Ikeda,&nbsp;Kay Uehara,&nbsp;Shuichiro Matoba,&nbsp;Yuichiro Tsukada,&nbsp;Toshiki Mukai,&nbsp;Kei Kimura,&nbsp;Yudai Fukui,&nbsp;Naoyuki Toyota","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical and extreme surgical procedure for <i>en bloc</i> removal of pelvic organs and tissues contiguously involved by cancer. PE has long been the mainstay, and often the only option to potentially provide cure, or long term control, in the management of patients with locally advanced and recurrent abdomino-pelvic malignancies. The concept focusses on attaining an R0 cancer resection margin (most commonly defined as ≥ 1 mm), by surgically removing margin-involved or margin-threatened organs and structures, as this is consistently demonstrated as the most important predictor of outcome [<span>1</span>]. Naturally, however, such radicality comes with significant risks of complications; of loss of function and quality of life; as well as substantial healthcare resource utilisation and health economic impact. Consequently, the deployment of PE as a surgical solution has in the past been correctly cautious, but at times also overly pessimistic, informed by historically poor outcomes.</p><p>In more recent times, the PE landscape has undergone a paradigm shift. Incremental developments in multiple disciplines have helped pave the way for substantially improved outcomes in carefully selected patients. These include but are not limited to advances in diagnostic radiology; oncology; anaesthesia and peri-operative medicine; intensive care; surgical devices and techniques; understanding of the pelvic anatomy; management and control of haemorrhage; reconstructive options; and interventional radiology [<span>2</span>]. As a result, the field of PE has evolved, with broadening indications and applications, and greater radicality, manifested by the fact that pelvic bones are increasingly resected as one of the most outermost tissues in a margin of concern, and reflecting the “higher and wider” approaches achievable [<span>3</span>].</p><p>The increasing application of PE has also emphasised some of the glaring unmet needs in the field. Examples of these are highlighted below but are not exhaustive. A lack of standardisation and differing protocols in MRI imaging techniques is one such unmet need. Poorly designed multidisciplinary team (MDT) models for the discussion of some of the most complex and heavily pre-treated patients an MDT may receive is another such unmet need. A further concern has been in the use of surgical terminology. Contemporary PE represents an umbrella term that in the modern era encompasses a diversity of resections, and to date a confusing array of terminology has been used to describe the different surgical interventions possible. Pathological handling of specimens, for example the method of specimen orientation and marking, the number of sections taken, and management of specimens with bone, is a further area of unmet need requiring a standardisation of reporting and minimum pathological datasets. Nevertheless to date no formal international system has been described. Importantly, as a result of the lack","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 5","pages":"880-882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145012023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Significance of Intraoperative Lavage Cytology in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma 术中灌洗细胞学检查在肝门周围胆管癌中的意义
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70044
Kentaro Miyake, Ryusei Matsuyama, Yusuke Nakazaki, Kota Sahara, Tomoaki Takahashi, Yutaro Kikuchi, Yasuhiro Yabushita, Yu Sawada, Yuki Homma, Itaru Endo

Background

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) has a poor prognosis, with frequent early metastatic recurrence after curative resection. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is particularly difficult to diagnose and predict. While intraoperative lavage cytology (CY) is a standard method to detect PM, its utility remains unclear in PHC. In this study, we investigated the significance of CY in PHC patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively examined the relationship between CY status and clinicopathological factors in 285 PHC patients and underwent CY for resection between January 1993 and December 2020.

Results

32/285 (11.2%) cases were CY positive. We excluded 61 cases of expiratory laparotomy due to distant metastasis or local extension and nine cases with postoperative hospital mortality. 215 cases were divided into CY positive group (CY+, n = 12) and CY negative group (CY−, n = 203). PM recurrence was higher in the CY+ group (33.3%) than in the CY− group (13.3%), though not statistically significant (p = 0.087). Median recurrence-free survival was 21.7 months (CY+) versus 30.6 months (CY−) (p = 0.357), and early recurrence (< 6 months) occurred in 16.7% versus 10.3% (p = 0.552). The median survival time was 42.8 months (CY+) and 44.1 months (CY−), with no significant difference (p = 0.678).

Conclusion

CY status was not strongly associated with PM or predictive of PM recurrence. Surgical resection may be justified in CY+ cases, as no statistically significant difference in prognosis was observed; however, these findings are exploratory and require validation in future studies.

背景肝门周围胆管癌(PHC)预后较差,在根治性切除后常发生早期转移复发。腹膜转移(PM)尤其难以诊断和预测。虽然术中灌洗细胞学(CY)是检测PM的标准方法,但其在PHC中的应用尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们探讨了CY在PHC患者中的意义。患者和方法回顾性分析了1993年1月至2020年12月期间接受CY切除术的285例PHC患者CY状态与临床病理因素的关系。结果285例患者中32例(11.2%)为CY阳性。我们排除了61例因远处转移或局部延伸的呼气剖腹手术和9例术后住院死亡率。215例患者分为CY阳性组(CY+, n = 12)和CY阴性组(CY -, n = 203)。CY+组PM复发率(33.3%)高于CY−组(13.3%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.087)。中位无复发生存期分别为21.7个月(CY+)和30.6个月(CY -) (p = 0.357),早期复发(<; 6个月)分别为16.7%和10.3% (p = 0.552)。中位生存时间分别为42.8个月(CY+)和44.1个月(CY -),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.678)。结论CY状态与PM无明显相关性,也不能预测PM的复发。CY+病例手术切除可能是合理的,因为预后无统计学差异;然而,这些发现是探索性的,需要在未来的研究中得到验证。
{"title":"Significance of Intraoperative Lavage Cytology in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Kentaro Miyake,&nbsp;Ryusei Matsuyama,&nbsp;Yusuke Nakazaki,&nbsp;Kota Sahara,&nbsp;Tomoaki Takahashi,&nbsp;Yutaro Kikuchi,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Yabushita,&nbsp;Yu Sawada,&nbsp;Yuki Homma,&nbsp;Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) has a poor prognosis, with frequent early metastatic recurrence after curative resection. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is particularly difficult to diagnose and predict. While intraoperative lavage cytology (CY) is a standard method to detect PM, its utility remains unclear in PHC. In this study, we investigated the significance of CY in PHC patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively examined the relationship between CY status and clinicopathological factors in 285 PHC patients and underwent CY for resection between January 1993 and December 2020.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>32/285 (11.2%) cases were CY positive. We excluded 61 cases of expiratory laparotomy due to distant metastasis or local extension and nine cases with postoperative hospital mortality. 215 cases were divided into CY positive group (CY+, <i>n</i> = 12) and CY negative group (CY−, <i>n</i> = 203). PM recurrence was higher in the CY+ group (33.3%) than in the CY− group (13.3%), though not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.087). Median recurrence-free survival was 21.7 months (CY+) versus 30.6 months (CY−) (<i>p</i> = 0.357), and early recurrence (&lt; 6 months) occurred in 16.7% versus 10.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.552). The median survival time was 42.8 months (CY+) and 44.1 months (CY−), with no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.678).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CY status was not strongly associated with PM or predictive of PM recurrence. Surgical resection may be justified in CY+ cases, as no statistically significant difference in prognosis was observed; however, these findings are exploratory and require validation in future studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1281-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Significance of Neoadjuvant S-1-Based Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer 以s -1为基础的新辅助化疗对老年局部晚期胃癌患者的意义
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-31 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70049
Kota Kawabata, Takuro Saito, Yukinori Kurokawa, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been extensively developed for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). In Asia, S-1-based regimens, such as docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) and S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), are expected to become the standard of care. However, the data on the significance of NAC for older patients with advanced GC remains scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC in older patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients with cStage II–III locally advanced GC who underwent radical surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2021. This study included three groups: 56 patients with NAC and age < 75 years (NAC-Young group), 20 with NAC and age ≥ 75 years (NAC-Older group), and 46 without NAC and age ≥ 75 years (OP-Older group). Patient backgrounds, adverse events of NAC, and prognoses were compared among the groups.

Results

Compared with the NAC-Young group, the NAC-Older group was more likely to receive the SOX regimen and reduced initial doses, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events of NAC and prognosis. Compared to the OP-Older group, overall survival and cancer-specific survival tended to be better in the NAC-Older group at cStage III. Moreover, for patients with cStage III and ECOG-PS 0, cancer-specific survival was significantly better in the NAC-Older group compared to the OP-Older group (p = 0.030).

Conclusions

NAC with S-1-based regimens is a feasible and effective treatment option for older patients with GC with advanced-stage disease and good overall condition.

背景新辅助化疗(NAC)已广泛应用于局部晚期胃癌(GC)。在亚洲,基于S-1的方案,如多西他赛、奥沙利铂和S-1 (DOS)以及S-1和奥沙利铂(SOX),有望成为标准治疗方案。然而,关于NAC对老年晚期胃癌患者的意义的数据仍然很少。因此,本研究旨在评价NAC在老年患者中的可行性和疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年至2021年间在我院接受根治性手术的c期II-III期局部晚期GC患者的数据。本研究分为三组:年龄≥75岁的NAC患者56例(NAC- young组),年龄≥75岁的NAC患者20例(NAC- older组),年龄≥75岁的无NAC患者46例(OP-Older组)。比较两组患者背景、NAC不良事件和预后。结果与NAC- young组相比,NAC- older组更有可能接受SOX方案并减少初始剂量,但NAC不良事件发生率和预后无显著差异。与OP-Older组相比,c期III时NAC-Older组的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率趋于更好。此外,对于ciii期和ECOG-PS 0的患者,与OP-Older组相比,NAC-Older组的癌症特异性生存率显著提高(p = 0.030)。结论NAC联合以s -1为基础的方案是一种可行、有效的治疗方案,适用于病情较好的老年晚期胃癌患者。
{"title":"Significance of Neoadjuvant S-1-Based Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer","authors":"Kota Kawabata,&nbsp;Takuro Saito,&nbsp;Yukinori Kurokawa,&nbsp;Kazuyoshi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takahashi,&nbsp;Koji Tanaka,&nbsp;Tomoki Makino,&nbsp;Kiyokazu Nakajima,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Eguchi,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been extensively developed for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). In Asia, S-1-based regimens, such as docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) and S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), are expected to become the standard of care. However, the data on the significance of NAC for older patients with advanced GC remains scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC in older patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients with cStage II–III locally advanced GC who underwent radical surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2021. This study included three groups: 56 patients with NAC and age &lt; 75 years (NAC-Young group), 20 with NAC and age ≥ 75 years (NAC-Older group), and 46 without NAC and age ≥ 75 years (OP-Older group). Patient backgrounds, adverse events of NAC, and prognoses were compared among the groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Compared with the NAC-Young group, the NAC-Older group was more likely to receive the SOX regimen and reduced initial doses, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events of NAC and prognosis. Compared to the OP-Older group, overall survival and cancer-specific survival tended to be better in the NAC-Older group at cStage III. Moreover, for patients with cStage III and ECOG-PS 0, cancer-specific survival was significantly better in the NAC-Older group compared to the OP-Older group (<i>p</i> = 0.030).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>NAC with S-1-based regimens is a feasible and effective treatment option for older patients with GC with advanced-stage disease and good overall condition.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1163-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70049","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgery for Older Cancer Patients: Cross-Organ Review and Good Practice Statement by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee 老年癌症患者的外科手术:日本老年肿瘤指南委员会的跨器官回顾和良好实践声明
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-31 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70048
Chie Tanaka, Takashi Ofuchi, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Daisuke Inoue, Ken Sugimoto, Keiko Murofushi, Toru Okuyama, Shigeaki Watanuki, Chiyo Imamura, Daisuke Sakai, Naomi Sakurai, Kiyotaka Watanabe, Kazuo Tamura, Toshiaki Saeki, Hiroshi Ishiguro

Background

Although the number of older people is increasing, there is a lack of evidence and insufficient consensus regarding postoperative complications and survival in older cancer patients. In this study, we conducted a literature search and systematic review focusing on the outcomes after surgery for older cancer patients.

Methods

Literature focusing on surgical treatment for older cancer patients was extracted from Japanese clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and gynecological cancers (uterine body, uterine cervix, ovary, and external genitalia and vagina). Outcomes were reviewed, and committee members determined the strength of evidence on a four-point scale (A to D), with A being the highest and D being the lowest.

Results

Older cancer patients tend to have a higher incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative syndromes, and their expected survival is generally shorter compared to non-older patients. When extensive surgeries such as para-aortic lymph node dissection and/or resection with other organs are performed for older cancer patients, the postoperative mortality rates tend to increase compared to non-older patients.

Conclusion

Surgical treatments for older cancer patients tend to result in higher morbidity even when the patients are in good health status. Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that a certain fraction of the patients achieve treatment outcomes comparable to those of non-older patients. Therefore, surgical indication and procedure for older cancer patients should be carefully determined based on surgical invasiveness and patient tolerability.

虽然老年患者的数量在不断增加,但关于老年癌症患者术后并发症和生存率的研究缺乏证据和共识。在本研究中,我们对老年癌症患者手术后的预后进行了文献检索和系统回顾。方法从日本胃癌、肺癌、结直肠癌、肝癌、妇科肿瘤(子宫体、子宫颈、卵巢、外生殖器和阴道)临床实践指南中提取高龄癌症患者手术治疗的相关文献。对结果进行了审查,委员会成员以四分制(a到D)确定了证据的强度,a是最高的,D是最低的。结果老年肿瘤患者术后并发症和术后综合征发生率较高,预期生存期普遍短于非老年患者。当对老年癌症患者进行主动脉旁淋巴结清扫和/或其他器官切除等广泛手术时,术后死亡率往往高于非老年患者。结论老年肿瘤患者在健康状况良好的情况下,手术治疗往往导致较高的发病率。尽管如此,仍有可能有一定比例的患者达到与非老年患者相当的治疗结果。因此,老年癌症患者的手术适应证和手术程序应根据手术的侵入性和患者的耐受性仔细确定。
{"title":"Surgery for Older Cancer Patients: Cross-Organ Review and Good Practice Statement by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee","authors":"Chie Tanaka,&nbsp;Takashi Ofuchi,&nbsp;Kiichiro Ninomiya,&nbsp;Daisuke Inoue,&nbsp;Ken Sugimoto,&nbsp;Keiko Murofushi,&nbsp;Toru Okuyama,&nbsp;Shigeaki Watanuki,&nbsp;Chiyo Imamura,&nbsp;Daisuke Sakai,&nbsp;Naomi Sakurai,&nbsp;Kiyotaka Watanabe,&nbsp;Kazuo Tamura,&nbsp;Toshiaki Saeki,&nbsp;Hiroshi Ishiguro","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although the number of older people is increasing, there is a lack of evidence and insufficient consensus regarding postoperative complications and survival in older cancer patients. In this study, we conducted a literature search and systematic review focusing on the outcomes after surgery for older cancer patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Literature focusing on surgical treatment for older cancer patients was extracted from Japanese clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and gynecological cancers (uterine body, uterine cervix, ovary, and external genitalia and vagina). Outcomes were reviewed, and committee members determined the strength of evidence on a four-point scale (A to D), with A being the highest and D being the lowest.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Older cancer patients tend to have a higher incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative syndromes, and their expected survival is generally shorter compared to non-older patients. When extensive surgeries such as para-aortic lymph node dissection and/or resection with other organs are performed for older cancer patients, the postoperative mortality rates tend to increase compared to non-older patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Surgical treatments for older cancer patients tend to result in higher morbidity even when the patients are in good health status. Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that a certain fraction of the patients achieve treatment outcomes comparable to those of non-older patients. Therefore, surgical indication and procedure for older cancer patients should be carefully determined based on surgical invasiveness and patient tolerability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1128-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic Impact of Hepatectomy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Non-Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2–3 cm): A Case-Matched Study 肝切除术与射频消融术对非小肝细胞癌(2-3厘米)预后的影响:一项病例匹配研究
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-31 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70046
Yuki Kitano, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Takumi Tanizaki, Yoshiyuki Tagayasu, Takashi Matsumoto, Rumi Itoyama, Shigeki Nakagawa, Hirohisa Okabe, Masaaki Iwatsuki

Background

While the surgery versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (SURF) trial demonstrated no significant difference in long-term outcomes between hepatectomy and RFA for patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (≤ 3 cm and less than three nodules), uncertainty persists regarding the potential risk of local recurrence and inferior overall survival (OS) associated with RFA for HCCs with a diameter ≥ 2 cm when compared to hepatectomy. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic outcomes of hepatectomy versus RFA for treating primary HCC of 2–3 cm and less than three nodules.

Methods

This retrospective study included 398 patients with primary HCC measuring 2–3 cm and having less than three nodules. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the hepatectomy (n = 281) and RFA (n = 117) cohorts, resulting in 101 matched pairs. OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed.

Results

Before PSM, hepatectomy showed better RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.74, p = 0.005) than RFA. After PSM, hepatectomy retained a trend of improved outcomes (RFS: HR = 0.72, p = 0.051, OS: HR = 0.63, p = 0.08), and the local recurrence rate (3.0 vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001) in hepatectomy were significantly lower than RFA. In the subgroup analysis, hepatectomy showed significantly better OS than RFA in the cohort with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 20 ng/mL (HR = 0.40, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

For patients with primary HCC measuring 2–3 cm and having less than three nodules, hepatectomy may offer superior prognostic benefits, particularly in those with elevated AFP levels. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on tumor size and AFP levels.

背景:虽然手术与射频消融(SURF)试验表明,对于小肝细胞癌(hcc)(≤3cm,小于3个结节)患者,肝切除术和射频消融在长期预后方面没有显著差异,但与肝切除术相比,直径≥2cm的hcc, RFA与局部复发的潜在风险和较差的总生存期(OS)仍然存在不确定性。本研究旨在阐明肝切除术与RFA治疗2-3厘米且小于3个结节的原发性HCC的预后结果。方法回顾性研究398例原发性肝癌,大小2 ~ 3 cm,结节小于3个。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡肝切除术(n = 281)和RFA (n = 117)队列,得到101对匹配。评估OS和无复发生存期(RFS)。结果PSM前肝切除术的RFS(风险比[HR] = 0.57, p < 0.001)和OS(风险比[HR] = 0.74, p = 0.005)优于RFA。PSM后肝切除术仍有改善预后的趋势(RFS: HR = 0.72, p = 0.051, OS: HR = 0.63, p = 0.08),肝切除术的局部复发率(3.0 vs 22.8%, p < 0.001)显著低于RFA。在亚组分析中,在甲胎蛋白(AFP)≥20 ng/mL的队列中,肝切除术的OS明显优于RFA (HR = 0.40, p = 0.03)。结论:对于原发性HCC尺寸为2-3 cm且小于3个结节的患者,肝切除术可能提供更好的预后益处,特别是对于AFP水平升高的患者。这些发现强调了基于肿瘤大小和AFP水平的个性化治疗决策的重要性。
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Hepatectomy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Non-Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2–3 cm): A Case-Matched Study","authors":"Yuki Kitano,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Hayashi,&nbsp;Takumi Tanizaki,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Tagayasu,&nbsp;Takashi Matsumoto,&nbsp;Rumi Itoyama,&nbsp;Shigeki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Hirohisa Okabe,&nbsp;Masaaki Iwatsuki","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While the surgery versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (SURF) trial demonstrated no significant difference in long-term outcomes between hepatectomy and RFA for patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (≤ 3 cm and less than three nodules), uncertainty persists regarding the potential risk of local recurrence and inferior overall survival (OS) associated with RFA for HCCs with a diameter ≥ 2 cm when compared to hepatectomy. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic outcomes of hepatectomy versus RFA for treating primary HCC of 2–3 cm and less than three nodules.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective study included 398 patients with primary HCC measuring 2–3 cm and having less than three nodules. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the hepatectomy (<i>n</i> = 281) and RFA (<i>n</i> = 117) cohorts, resulting in 101 matched pairs. OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Before PSM, hepatectomy showed better RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.74, <i>p</i> = 0.005) than RFA. After PSM, hepatectomy retained a trend of improved outcomes (RFS: HR = 0.72, <i>p</i> = 0.051, OS: HR = 0.63, <i>p</i> = 0.08), and the local recurrence rate (3.0 vs. 22.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in hepatectomy were significantly lower than RFA. In the subgroup analysis, hepatectomy showed significantly better OS than RFA in the cohort with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 20 ng/mL (HR = 0.40, <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For patients with primary HCC measuring 2–3 cm and having less than three nodules, hepatectomy may offer superior prognostic benefits, particularly in those with elevated AFP levels. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on tumor size and AFP levels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1303-1311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Evaluation of the NCD Risk Calculator for Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: A Validation Study 老年患者开放胰十二指肠切除术NCD风险计算器的风险评估:一项验证研究
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70045
Nana Kimura, Ayaka Itoh, Ayano Sakai, Katsuhisa Hirano, Kenta Yagi, Naoya Takeda, Kazuto Shibuya, Isaku Yoshioka, Kenta Murotani, Tsutomu Fujii

Background

There is no clear indication for surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for the elderly patients. The aim of this study was to use real-world data to investigate the usefulness of preoperative risk assessment with the risk calculator available in the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 311 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent PD was performed. In addition to background factors, preoperative predicted incidence rates calculated with the risk calculator, as well as visceral fat analysis items, were analyzed. Patients with (1) serious postoperative complications, (2) a decline in postoperative activities of daily living (ADL), or (3) discharge to a place other than home were defined as having a poor postoperative course. All patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort (n = 209) or validation cohort (n = 102).

Results

Comparisons of patient characteristics revealed no differences between the training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that “Predicted incidence of postoperative ADL decline” of ≥ 44.8% (OR 4.68; p = 0.031) and “Predicted incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade IV or higher” of ≥ 9.2% (OR 5.92; p = 0.025) among those calculated with the risk calculator were independent predictors of a poor postoperative course. Among patients with 2, 1, and none of these factors, 100%, 47.4%, and 15.7%, respectively, had a poor postoperative course.

Conclusion

A “Predicted incidence of postoperative ADL decline” and “Predicted incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade IV or higher” in the NCD risk calculator were useful predictors of a poor postoperative course after PD.

背景老年胰十二指肠切除术(PD)没有明确的手术指征。本研究的目的是使用真实世界的数据来调查术前风险评估与日本国家临床数据库(NCD)中可用的风险计算器的有用性。方法对311例年龄≥65岁的PD患者进行回顾性分析。除背景因素外,分析术前用风险计算器计算的预测发病率,以及内脏脂肪分析项目。出现(1)严重的术后并发症,(2)术后日常生活活动(ADL)下降,或(3)出院到家中以外的地方的患者被定义为术后病程不良。所有患者被随机分配到训练组(n = 209)或验证组(n = 102)。结果:患者特征的比较显示训练组和验证组之间没有差异。在培训队列中,多因素分析显示,在使用风险计算器计算的队列中,“预测术后ADL下降发生率”≥44.8% (OR 4.68, p = 0.031)和“预测Clavien-Dindo IV级及以上发生率”≥9.2% (OR 5.92, p = 0.025)是术后不良病程的独立预测因素。在有2、1和无这些因素的患者中,分别有100%、47.4%和15.7%的患者术后病程较差。结论NCD风险计算器中“预测术后ADL下降发生率”和“预测Clavien-Dindo IV级及以上发生率”是PD术后不良病程的有效预测指标。
{"title":"Risk Evaluation of the NCD Risk Calculator for Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: A Validation Study","authors":"Nana Kimura,&nbsp;Ayaka Itoh,&nbsp;Ayano Sakai,&nbsp;Katsuhisa Hirano,&nbsp;Kenta Yagi,&nbsp;Naoya Takeda,&nbsp;Kazuto Shibuya,&nbsp;Isaku Yoshioka,&nbsp;Kenta Murotani,&nbsp;Tsutomu Fujii","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is no clear indication for surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for the elderly patients. The aim of this study was to use real-world data to investigate the usefulness of preoperative risk assessment with the risk calculator available in the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective analysis of 311 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent PD was performed. In addition to background factors, preoperative predicted incidence rates calculated with the risk calculator, as well as visceral fat analysis items, were analyzed. Patients with (1) serious postoperative complications, (2) a decline in postoperative activities of daily living (ADL), or (3) discharge to a place other than home were defined as having a poor postoperative course. All patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort (<i>n</i> = 209) or validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 102).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Comparisons of patient characteristics revealed no differences between the training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that “Predicted incidence of postoperative ADL decline” of ≥ 44.8% (OR 4.68; <i>p</i> = 0.031) and “Predicted incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade IV or higher” of ≥ 9.2% (OR 5.92; <i>p</i> = 0.025) among those calculated with the risk calculator were independent predictors of a poor postoperative course. Among patients with 2, 1, and none of these factors, 100%, 47.4%, and 15.7%, respectively, had a poor postoperative course.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A “Predicted incidence of postoperative ADL decline” and “Predicted incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade IV or higher” in the NCD risk calculator were useful predictors of a poor postoperative course after PD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1289-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy Over Open Surgery 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术较开放手术的长期营养价值
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70038
Koki Kurahashi, Takayuki Anazawa, Kei Yamane, Kazuyuki Nagai, Satoshi Ishida, Satoshi Ogiso, Yoichiro Uchida, Takashi Ito, Takamichi Ishii, Etsuro Hatano

Aim

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a highly invasive surgical procedure associated with postoperative malnutrition. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is a minimally invasive alternative, but its long-term effects on nutritional outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to compare long-term nutritional outcomes between LPD and open PD (OPD) and to identify factors influencing postoperative nutritional status.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients who underwent PD. Nutritional indicators, including the psoas muscle index (PMI), prognostic nutritional index, and liver-to-spleen ratio, were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors affecting nutritional outcomes.

Results

The LPD group (n = 36) demonstrated better PMI preservation at 12 months compared with the OPD group (n = 29) (p = 0.002), with significantly lower fatty liver incidence (3.7% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.038) and higher prognostic nutritional index values at 3 months (p = 0.029). LPD was identified as an independent factor for improved PMI (p = 0.020). Additionally, LPD was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays.

Conclusion

LPD improves long-term nutritional outcomes by preserving muscle mass and reducing metabolic disruptions, thus supporting its role in enhancing postoperative recovery and quality of life. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

目的胰十二指肠切除术(PD)是一种与术后营养不良相关的高侵入性手术。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)是一种微创的替代方法,但其对营养结果的长期影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较LPD和open PD (OPD)的长期营养结果,并确定影响术后营养状况的因素。方法对65例PD患者进行回顾性分析。营养指标,包括腰肌指数(PMI)、预后营养指数和肝脾比,分别于术后3、6和12个月进行评估。进行多变量分析以确定影响营养结局的因素。结果与OPD组(n = 29)相比,LPD组(n = 36)在12个月时表现出更好的PMI保存(p = 0.002),脂肪肝发生率显著降低(3.7% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.038), 3个月时预后营养指数更高(p = 0.029)。LPD被确定为改善PMI的独立因素(p = 0.020)。此外,LPD与减少失血和缩短住院时间有关。结论LPD通过保持肌肉量和减少代谢紊乱来改善长期营养状况,从而支持其在提高术后恢复和生活质量方面的作用。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Long-Term Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy Over Open Surgery","authors":"Koki Kurahashi,&nbsp;Takayuki Anazawa,&nbsp;Kei Yamane,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Nagai,&nbsp;Satoshi Ishida,&nbsp;Satoshi Ogiso,&nbsp;Yoichiro Uchida,&nbsp;Takashi Ito,&nbsp;Takamichi Ishii,&nbsp;Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a highly invasive surgical procedure associated with postoperative malnutrition. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is a minimally invasive alternative, but its long-term effects on nutritional outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to compare long-term nutritional outcomes between LPD and open PD (OPD) and to identify factors influencing postoperative nutritional status.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients who underwent PD. Nutritional indicators, including the psoas muscle index (PMI), prognostic nutritional index, and liver-to-spleen ratio, were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors affecting nutritional outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The LPD group (<i>n</i> = 36) demonstrated better PMI preservation at 12 months compared with the OPD group (<i>n</i> = 29) (<i>p</i> = 0.002), with significantly lower fatty liver incidence (3.7% vs. 22.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and higher prognostic nutritional index values at 3 months (<i>p</i> = 0.029). LPD was identified as an independent factor for improved PMI (<i>p</i> = 0.020). Additionally, LPD was associated with reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>LPD improves long-term nutritional outcomes by preserving muscle mass and reducing metabolic disruptions, thus supporting its role in enhancing postoperative recovery and quality of life. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1263-1272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two-Stage Treatment for Adult Large Patent Ductus Venosus 成人大静脉导管未闭的两阶段治疗
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70043
Shohei Kudo, Shiro Onozawa, Ryosuke Miyauchi, Ryota Matsuki, Yoshihiro Sakamoto

Patent ductus venosus is a congenital portosystemic shunt that may cause progressive portal hypertension, hepatic encephalopathy, and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Embolization of the Arantius' duct is the first choice of treatment in infants and children. However, it carries the risk of coil migration into the systemic circulation in adult patients with larger Arantius ducts. Additionally, the primary closure of the Arantius' duct may result in acute portal hypertension. Herein, we present a two-stage treatment for adult patent large ductus venosus (Arantius' duct). A 23-year-old female patient with hypoalbuminemia showed a patent large Arantius' duct (diameter = 45 mm), intrahepatic portal venous hypoplasia, and multiple hepatic nodules with dynamic computed tomography (CT). Preoperative angiography showed the absence of the intrahepatic portal vein, and tentative occlusion of the Arantius' duct increased the portal pressure from 9 to 15 mmHg with visualization of only a few portal branches. Therefore, we conducted a two-stage treatment for the Arantius' duct. In the first stage, we used an open approach to perform angioplasty of the Arantius' duct to reduce the size from 45 to 8 mm in diameter, which gradually increased the intrahepatic portal blood flow in the follow-up CT scan. The second-stage embolization of the Arantius' duct was performed using an interventional procedure via the internal jugular vein 4 months after the first stage. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and post-treatment CT showed increased intrahepatic portal flow. Serum albumin value increased from 2.7 to 3.7 g/dL 2 weeks post-treatment.

静脉导管未闭是一种先天性门静脉系统分流,可导致进行性门静脉高压症、肝性脑病和肝局灶性结节性增生。阿兰提斯导管栓塞是婴儿和儿童的首选治疗方法。然而,对于有较大阿兰蒂乌斯导管的成年患者,它有线圈迁移到体循环的风险。此外,阿兰蒂乌斯导管的原发性关闭可能导致急性门静脉高压。在此,我们提出成人大静脉导管未闭的两阶段治疗。23岁女性低白蛋白血症患者,动态CT表现为大阿兰蒂斯管未闭(直径45mm),肝内门静脉发育不全,多发肝结节。术前血管造影显示肝内门静脉缺失,Arantius导管的暂时性阻塞使门静脉压力从9增加到15 mmHg,仅可见少量门静脉分支。因此,我们对阿兰提斯导管进行了两阶段治疗。在第一阶段,我们采用开放入路对Arantius管进行血管成形术,将直径从45 mm缩小到8 mm,在后续CT扫描中逐渐增加肝内门静脉血流。第一期术后4个月,采用颈内静脉介入手术对Arantius导管进行第二期栓塞。患者恢复顺利,治疗后CT显示肝内门静脉血流增加。治疗后2周,血清白蛋白由2.7 g/dL升高至3.7 g/dL。
{"title":"Two-Stage Treatment for Adult Large Patent Ductus Venosus","authors":"Shohei Kudo,&nbsp;Shiro Onozawa,&nbsp;Ryosuke Miyauchi,&nbsp;Ryota Matsuki,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Sakamoto","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patent ductus venosus is a congenital portosystemic shunt that may cause progressive portal hypertension, hepatic encephalopathy, and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Embolization of the Arantius' duct is the first choice of treatment in infants and children. However, it carries the risk of coil migration into the systemic circulation in adult patients with larger Arantius ducts. Additionally, the primary closure of the Arantius' duct may result in acute portal hypertension. Herein, we present a two-stage treatment for adult patent large ductus venosus (Arantius' duct). A 23-year-old female patient with hypoalbuminemia showed a patent large Arantius' duct (diameter = 45 mm), intrahepatic portal venous hypoplasia, and multiple hepatic nodules with dynamic computed tomography (CT). Preoperative angiography showed the absence of the intrahepatic portal vein, and tentative occlusion of the Arantius' duct increased the portal pressure from 9 to 15 mmHg with visualization of only a few portal branches. Therefore, we conducted a two-stage treatment for the Arantius' duct. In the first stage, we used an open approach to perform angioplasty of the Arantius' duct to reduce the size from 45 to 8 mm in diameter, which gradually increased the intrahepatic portal blood flow in the follow-up CT scan. The second-stage embolization of the Arantius' duct was performed using an interventional procedure via the internal jugular vein 4 months after the first stage. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and post-treatment CT showed increased intrahepatic portal flow. Serum albumin value increased from 2.7 to 3.7 g/dL 2 weeks post-treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 5","pages":"1104-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145013077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External Validation of an Automated Surgical Step Recognition Model for Robotic Distal Gastrectomy (RDG) Using a Multicenter Dataset 使用多中心数据集对机器人远端胃切除术(RDG)的自动手术步骤识别模型进行外部验证
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70042
James S. Strong, Masahiro Yura, Masashi Takeuchi, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Tasuku Furube, Yusuke Maeda, Satoru Matsuda, Takahiro Kinoshita, Yuko Kitagawa

Background

Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are revolutionizing surgical practices, enhancing the analysis and outcomes of complex procedures. Recent advances in AI-based computer vision have enabled our team to develop a novel artificial intelligence model that can recognize defined steps of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG).

Methods

This study assessed 130 robotic surgical videos from two institutions, 69 and 61 videos, respectively. The AI model used TeCNO, a multi-stage temporal convolutional network, and was trained using annotated videos with surgical steps defined by qualified surgeons. RDG step recognition predicted by the model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F-value metrics, and statistical analysis was assessed.

Results

Three data sets were established to train and test the model. AI trained on single institution training sets performs moderately well at predicting RDG surgical steps with accuracies ranging from 56% to 63%, whereas AI trained on the multi-institutional data yielded a step recognition accuracy of 86%. These results were confirmed with F-scores and precision tests.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that an AI step recognition model for RDG can predict surgical steps in an external video dataset with moderate accuracy. Furthermore, we conclude that training an AI model on a multi-institutional dataset significantly increases its step recognition capabilities. These results confirm that our model can be utilized by external institutions, and that a diverse training set of RDG procedures from multiple institutions is valuable to developing an AI model with precise step recognition capabilities in new institutions.

人工智能(AI)的创新正在彻底改变外科实践,增强复杂手术的分析和结果。基于人工智能的计算机视觉的最新进展使我们的团队能够开发出一种新的人工智能模型,该模型可以识别机器人远端胃切除术(RDG)的定义步骤。方法本研究对来自两家机构的130个机器人手术视频进行评估,分别为69个和61个。人工智能模型使用了多阶段时间卷积网络TeCNO,并使用由合格外科医生定义的手术步骤的注释视频进行训练。采用准确率、精密度、召回率和f值指标对模型预测的RDG步长识别进行评估,并进行统计分析。结果建立了三个数据集,对模型进行了训练和测试。在单机构训练集上训练的人工智能在预测RDG手术步骤方面表现良好,准确率在56%到63%之间,而在多机构数据上训练的人工智能的步骤识别准确率为86%。这些结果被f分数和精度测试证实。我们证明了用于RDG的人工智能步长识别模型可以以中等精度预测外部视频数据集中的手术步长。此外,我们得出结论,在多机构数据集上训练人工智能模型可以显著提高其步长识别能力。这些结果证实了我们的模型可以被外部机构使用,并且来自多个机构的不同RDG程序训练集对于在新机构中开发具有精确步骤识别能力的人工智能模型是有价值的。
{"title":"External Validation of an Automated Surgical Step Recognition Model for Robotic Distal Gastrectomy (RDG) Using a Multicenter Dataset","authors":"James S. Strong,&nbsp;Masahiro Yura,&nbsp;Masashi Takeuchi,&nbsp;Hirofumi Kawakubo,&nbsp;Tasuku Furube,&nbsp;Yusuke Maeda,&nbsp;Satoru Matsuda,&nbsp;Takahiro Kinoshita,&nbsp;Yuko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are revolutionizing surgical practices, enhancing the analysis and outcomes of complex procedures. Recent advances in AI-based computer vision have enabled our team to develop a novel artificial intelligence model that can recognize defined steps of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study assessed 130 robotic surgical videos from two institutions, 69 and 61 videos, respectively. The AI model used TeCNO, a multi-stage temporal convolutional network, and was trained using annotated videos with surgical steps defined by qualified surgeons. RDG step recognition predicted by the model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F-value metrics, and statistical analysis was assessed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three data sets were established to train and test the model. AI trained on single institution training sets performs moderately well at predicting RDG surgical steps with accuracies ranging from 56% to 63%, whereas AI trained on the multi-institutional data yielded a step recognition accuracy of 86%. These results were confirmed with <i>F</i>-scores and precision tests.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We demonstrated that an AI step recognition model for RDG can predict surgical steps in an external video dataset with moderate accuracy. Furthermore, we conclude that training an AI model on a multi-institutional dataset significantly increases its step recognition capabilities. These results confirm that our model can be utilized by external institutions, and that a diverse training set of RDG procedures from multiple institutions is valuable to developing an AI model with precise step recognition capabilities in new institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1155-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70042","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Essential Updates 2023/2024: Recent Advances of Multimodal Approach in Patients for Gastric Cancer 基本更新2023/2024:胃癌患者多模式入路的最新进展
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70041
Katsutoshi Shoda, Yoshihiko Kawaguchi, Suguru Maruyama, Daisuke Ichikawa

Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, especially in East Asia. Recent years have brought significant advances in multimodal management, including surgery, perioperative chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and supportive care. This review summarizes key updates from 2023 to 2024, focusing on surgical innovations, perioperative systemic therapy, treatment strategies for stage IV disease, and nutritional interventions. In early and locally advanced disease, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy have become widely accepted in Asia, supported by large, randomized trials such as JCOG0912 and KLASS-02. Perioperative chemotherapy has become a global standard, with the FLOT regimen leading in the West and SOX, XELOX, or DOS emerging in Asia. Immunotherapy is increasingly incorporated into perioperative settings, with trials like KEYNOTE-585 and NEONIPIGA suggesting potential benefit in selected patients. For stage IV gastric cancer, systemic chemotherapy remains the mainstay, but conversion surgery and treatment of oligometastasis have shown promising results in selected cases. Trials such as JCOG1704 and AIO-FLOT5 are investigating optimal strategies. Perioperative nutrition has also gained attention, with oral nutritional supplements, ERAS protocols, and digital tools like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and AI-driven platforms enhancing outcomes. Looking ahead, integration of molecular biomarkers (e.g., HER2, PD-L1, MSI, ctDNA), precise staging, and multidisciplinary collaboration will be essential for personalized treatment. Ongoing trials and international cooperation are expected to further refine evidence-based approaches to gastric cancer care.

胃癌仍然是一个主要的全球健康负担,特别是在东亚。近年来,包括手术、围手术期化疗、免疫治疗和支持性护理在内的多模式治疗取得了重大进展。本综述总结了2023年至2024年的关键进展,重点是外科创新、围手术期全身治疗、IV期疾病治疗策略和营养干预。在早期和局部晚期疾病中,腹腔镜和机器人胃切除术在亚洲已被广泛接受,这得到了JCOG0912和KLASS-02等大型随机试验的支持。围手术期化疗已成为全球标准,FLOT方案在西方领先,SOX、XELOX或DOS方案在亚洲兴起。免疫治疗越来越多地纳入围手术期环境,KEYNOTE-585和NEONIPIGA等试验表明,在选定的患者中有潜在的益处。对于IV期胃癌,全身性化疗仍然是主要的治疗方法,但在某些病例中,转换手术和少转移治疗显示出良好的效果。JCOG1704和AIO-FLOT5等试验正在研究最优策略。围手术期营养也引起了人们的关注,口服营养补充剂、ERAS方案以及持续血糖监测(CGM)等数字工具和人工智能驱动的平台提高了结果。展望未来,整合分子生物标志物(如HER2、PD-L1、MSI、ctDNA)、精确分期和多学科合作将是个性化治疗的必要条件。正在进行的试验和国际合作有望进一步完善基于证据的胃癌治疗方法。
{"title":"Essential Updates 2023/2024: Recent Advances of Multimodal Approach in Patients for Gastric Cancer","authors":"Katsutoshi Shoda,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Suguru Maruyama,&nbsp;Daisuke Ichikawa","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, especially in East Asia. Recent years have brought significant advances in multimodal management, including surgery, perioperative chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and supportive care. This review summarizes key updates from 2023 to 2024, focusing on surgical innovations, perioperative systemic therapy, treatment strategies for stage IV disease, and nutritional interventions. In early and locally advanced disease, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy have become widely accepted in Asia, supported by large, randomized trials such as JCOG0912 and KLASS-02. Perioperative chemotherapy has become a global standard, with the FLOT regimen leading in the West and SOX, XELOX, or DOS emerging in Asia. Immunotherapy is increasingly incorporated into perioperative settings, with trials like KEYNOTE-585 and NEONIPIGA suggesting potential benefit in selected patients. For stage IV gastric cancer, systemic chemotherapy remains the mainstay, but conversion surgery and treatment of oligometastasis have shown promising results in selected cases. Trials such as JCOG1704 and AIO-FLOT5 are investigating optimal strategies. Perioperative nutrition has also gained attention, with oral nutritional supplements, ERAS protocols, and digital tools like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and AI-driven platforms enhancing outcomes. Looking ahead, integration of molecular biomarkers (e.g., HER2, PD-L1, MSI, ctDNA), precise staging, and multidisciplinary collaboration will be essential for personalized treatment. Ongoing trials and international cooperation are expected to further refine evidence-based approaches to gastric cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 6","pages":"1119-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1