{"title":"Bug zoo-keeping and scientific innovation","authors":"L. Nault","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"143 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41378752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Retraction of: Symbiotic Association Between Ants and Fungus","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"184 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45458255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The nutritional quality of herbivorous insects' food can not only directly affect the herbivorous insects themselves, but can also indirectly affect their parasitoids. To investigate these cascading, multi-trophic effects, we reared cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on artificial diets (8.1, 11.5, 16.75, 25.5, 34.25, and 43 g protein/liter diet) to assess how diet protein content affected the development of this common pest and its suitability as a host for the gregarious parasitoid, Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Nonparasitized caterpillars experienced increased mortality when reared on 8.1 g protein/liter diet, and slower development and reduced pupal mass when reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet. Host diet did not affect the percentage of hosts with parasitoid emergence nor the mass of individual parasitoids. However, parasitoid broods emerging from caterpillars reared on ≤25.5 g protein/liter diet were smaller and those reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet exhibited prolonged development. The consequences of host diet on these latter F1 parasitoids did not affect their reproductive fitness. Caterpillars compensated for nutrient stress, induced by either low quality diet or parasitism, by increasing the amount of diet that they consumed. These collective results demonstrate the plasticity of host-parasitoid systems. Compensatory feeding allows the host caterpillar to moderate the consequences of low quality diets, which may subsequently affect the F1 parasitoids developing within the host, but not necessarily affect the F2 parasitoid generation. Résumé La qualité nutritionnelle de la nourriture des insectes herbivores peu non seulement affecter directement les insecte herbivores mais aussi indirectement les parasitoïdes des insectes herbivores. Pour examiner ces effets multitrophiques, nous avons élevé des larves de la fausse-arpenteuse du chou, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), sur des milieux nutritif artificiel (8,1; 11,5; 16,75; 25,5; 34,25 et 43 g de protéine par litre) pour évaluer comment le taux de protéine du milieu nutritif affectait le développement de ce ravageur commun et sa qualité en tant qu'hôte pour le parasitoïde grégaire Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Pour les chenilles non-parasitées, un accroissement de mortalité a été observé pour celles élevées sur le milieu nutritif contenant 8,1 g de protéines par litre, et un accroissement du temps de développement et une réduction de la masse des chrysalides ont été observé pour celles élevées sur les milieux nutritifs contenant au plus 16,75 g de protéines par litre. Le taux de protéines dans l'alimentation des chenilles n'a pas influencé le pourcentage de chenilles parasitées qui ont produits des parasitoïdes, ni la masse individuelle des parasitoïdes. Cependant, les chenilles parasitées élevées sur les milieux nutritifs contenant au plus 25,5 g de protéines par litre ont p
{"title":"Protein Deficient Diets: Cascade Effects on a Lepidopteran Pest and Its Parasitoid Wasp","authors":"V. Hervet, R. Laird, K. Floate","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saac029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac029","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The nutritional quality of herbivorous insects' food can not only directly affect the herbivorous insects themselves, but can also indirectly affect their parasitoids. To investigate these cascading, multi-trophic effects, we reared cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on artificial diets (8.1, 11.5, 16.75, 25.5, 34.25, and 43 g protein/liter diet) to assess how diet protein content affected the development of this common pest and its suitability as a host for the gregarious parasitoid, Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Nonparasitized caterpillars experienced increased mortality when reared on 8.1 g protein/liter diet, and slower development and reduced pupal mass when reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet. Host diet did not affect the percentage of hosts with parasitoid emergence nor the mass of individual parasitoids. However, parasitoid broods emerging from caterpillars reared on ≤25.5 g protein/liter diet were smaller and those reared on ≤16.75 g protein/liter diet exhibited prolonged development. The consequences of host diet on these latter F1 parasitoids did not affect their reproductive fitness. Caterpillars compensated for nutrient stress, induced by either low quality diet or parasitism, by increasing the amount of diet that they consumed. These collective results demonstrate the plasticity of host-parasitoid systems. Compensatory feeding allows the host caterpillar to moderate the consequences of low quality diets, which may subsequently affect the F1 parasitoids developing within the host, but not necessarily affect the F2 parasitoid generation. Résumé La qualité nutritionnelle de la nourriture des insectes herbivores peu non seulement affecter directement les insecte herbivores mais aussi indirectement les parasitoïdes des insectes herbivores. Pour examiner ces effets multitrophiques, nous avons élevé des larves de la fausse-arpenteuse du chou, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), sur des milieux nutritif artificiel (8,1; 11,5; 16,75; 25,5; 34,25 et 43 g de protéine par litre) pour évaluer comment le taux de protéine du milieu nutritif affectait le développement de ce ravageur commun et sa qualité en tant qu'hôte pour le parasitoïde grégaire Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Pour les chenilles non-parasitées, un accroissement de mortalité a été observé pour celles élevées sur le milieu nutritif contenant 8,1 g de protéines par litre, et un accroissement du temps de développement et une réduction de la masse des chrysalides ont été observé pour celles élevées sur les milieux nutritifs contenant au plus 16,75 g de protéines par litre. Le taux de protéines dans l'alimentation des chenilles n'a pas influencé le pourcentage de chenilles parasitées qui ont produits des parasitoïdes, ni la masse individuelle des parasitoïdes. Cependant, les chenilles parasitées élevées sur les milieux nutritifs contenant au plus 25,5 g de protéines par litre ont p","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"162 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49264800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Invertebrates that successfully colonize new habitats often share life history characteristics including high fertility, rapid development, and early maturation. Since its introduction into Florida, USA, the non-native Brown Widow, Latrodectus geometricus (Kock 1841, Araneae: Theridiidae), has rapidly expanded its range into urban areas as far north as Kansas and as far west as California. During its expansion, the Brown Widow has displaced Florida's Southern Black Widow, L. mactans (Fabricius 1775, Araneae: Tjerodoodae) and California's Western Black Widow, L. Hesperus (Chamber lin & Ivie 1935, Araneae: Theridiidae). Here, based on a field survey and controlled laboratory experiments, we report possible causes for the rapid disappearance of Florida's Southern Black Widows. Our field survey revealed that Brown Widows have twice the fertility potential as Southern Black Widows. In experiments comparing development, we show that sub-adult Brown Widows grew faster and matured earlier relative to Southern Black Widows. In our experiments on cohabitation with neighbors, bold Brown Widows were six times more likely to kill and consume shy Southern Black Widows than bold cobweb spiders and three times more likely to cohabitate with bold cobweb spiders than with shy Southern Black Widows. Our model of maternal risk-management revealed that competition for scarce prey was not a significant cause of offspring mortality for Latrodectus species. Hence, Brown Widows are not predating Black Widows or other cobweb spiders because prey is scarce. To our knowledge, this study is the first to suggest that aggressive predation by Brown Widows is a significant factor contributing to the local extinction of the shy Southern Black Widow in urban structures.
{"title":"Predation by the Introduced BrownWidow Spider (Araneae: Theridiidae) May Explain Local Extinctions of Native BlackWidows in Urban Habitats","authors":"Louis A Coticchio, R. Vetter, D. Cassill","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Invertebrates that successfully colonize new habitats often share life history characteristics including high fertility, rapid development, and early maturation. Since its introduction into Florida, USA, the non-native Brown Widow, Latrodectus geometricus (Kock 1841, Araneae: Theridiidae), has rapidly expanded its range into urban areas as far north as Kansas and as far west as California. During its expansion, the Brown Widow has displaced Florida's Southern Black Widow, L. mactans (Fabricius 1775, Araneae: Tjerodoodae) and California's Western Black Widow, L. Hesperus (Chamber lin & Ivie 1935, Araneae: Theridiidae). Here, based on a field survey and controlled laboratory experiments, we report possible causes for the rapid disappearance of Florida's Southern Black Widows. Our field survey revealed that Brown Widows have twice the fertility potential as Southern Black Widows. In experiments comparing development, we show that sub-adult Brown Widows grew faster and matured earlier relative to Southern Black Widows. In our experiments on cohabitation with neighbors, bold Brown Widows were six times more likely to kill and consume shy Southern Black Widows than bold cobweb spiders and three times more likely to cohabitate with bold cobweb spiders than with shy Southern Black Widows. Our model of maternal risk-management revealed that competition for scarce prey was not a significant cause of offspring mortality for Latrodectus species. Hence, Brown Widows are not predating Black Widows or other cobweb spiders because prey is scarce. To our knowledge, this study is the first to suggest that aggressive predation by Brown Widows is a significant factor contributing to the local extinction of the shy Southern Black Widow in urban structures.","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"174 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45294704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reviewers for Annals of the Entomological Society of America(November 2021–October 2022)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"141 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41828641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New Vision and Mission for the Annals of the ESA","authors":"D. Onstad","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"75 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42286020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Honěk, I. Novák, Z. Martinková, P. Saska, J. Kulfan, M. Holecová, Terézia Jauschová, P. Zach
Abstract Using seventeen-year records of daily light trap catches of predatory Neuroptera (Chrysopidae, 13 species) and Coleoptera (Coccinellidae, 10 species), and of phytophagous Lepidoptera (Noctuidae, 79 species) we tested a hypothesis predicting that the range of annual fluctuations of catch size is greater in aphidophages, whose diet occurs irregularly and locally, than in phytophages, whose diet is available regularly and abundantly.The ranges of fluctuations of annual catches measured as the coefficient of variance (standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the average) of detrended annual catches were significantly greater in Chrysopidae (84 ± 7.1%) and Coccinellidae (121 ± 14.0%) than in Noctuidae (66 ± 2.6%). The difference between aphidophages and phytophages remained when we tested differences between the former and the samples of Noctuidae consisting only of those species whose characteristics (abundance, length and timing of flight period, number of generations per season, overwintering stage) were the same as in aphidophages. Similarly, no differences were found between sets of Noctuidae species that have characteristics (abundance, voltinism, period of flight activity) similar to aphidophages and sets of Noctuidae species that have contrary characteristics. Flight abilities of aphidophages are smaller than those of Noctuidae. As a result of this difference a light trap collects populations of aphidophages from a smaller area than populations of Noctuidae.Thus the extent of fluctuations of catch size of aphidophagous and phytophagous species is influenced both by annual differences in food availability and by differences in size of the area from which the individuals assembling to the light source are recruited.
{"title":"Trophic Ecology Drives Annual Variation in Abundance of Aphidophagous (Coccinellidae, Coleoptera and Chrysopidae, Neuroptera) and Phytophagous (Noctuidae, Lepidoptera) Insects: Evidence From Light Traps","authors":"A. Honěk, I. Novák, Z. Martinková, P. Saska, J. Kulfan, M. Holecová, Terézia Jauschová, P. Zach","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saad002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saad002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using seventeen-year records of daily light trap catches of predatory Neuroptera (Chrysopidae, 13 species) and Coleoptera (Coccinellidae, 10 species), and of phytophagous Lepidoptera (Noctuidae, 79 species) we tested a hypothesis predicting that the range of annual fluctuations of catch size is greater in aphidophages, whose diet occurs irregularly and locally, than in phytophages, whose diet is available regularly and abundantly.The ranges of fluctuations of annual catches measured as the coefficient of variance (standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the average) of detrended annual catches were significantly greater in Chrysopidae (84 ± 7.1%) and Coccinellidae (121 ± 14.0%) than in Noctuidae (66 ± 2.6%). The difference between aphidophages and phytophages remained when we tested differences between the former and the samples of Noctuidae consisting only of those species whose characteristics (abundance, length and timing of flight period, number of generations per season, overwintering stage) were the same as in aphidophages. Similarly, no differences were found between sets of Noctuidae species that have characteristics (abundance, voltinism, period of flight activity) similar to aphidophages and sets of Noctuidae species that have contrary characteristics. Flight abilities of aphidophages are smaller than those of Noctuidae. As a result of this difference a light trap collects populations of aphidophages from a smaller area than populations of Noctuidae.Thus the extent of fluctuations of catch size of aphidophagous and phytophagous species is influenced both by annual differences in food availability and by differences in size of the area from which the individuals assembling to the light source are recruited.","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"125 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42576111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This review summarizes which body parts have taste function in which insect taxa. Evidence of taste by mouthparts, antennae, and tarsi is widespread. Mouthparts that commonly have taste function are the labium, including the labella and labial palps, the maxillae, including the galeae and maxillary palps, the inner surface of the labrum or clypeolabrum of chewers, and inside the precibarium/cibarium of hemipterans, which have piercing-sucking mouthparts. Tasting with mandibles has not been found, and tasting with the hypopharynx is seldom reported. Use of the antennae appears uncommon among fly species, but common among species of lepidopterans, hymenopterans, beetles, and bugs. Although tasting with legs, especially tarsi, is reported mostly for fly and lepidopteran species, there is also evidence of it for multiple species of beetles, grasshoppers, and hemipterans, and one species of a roach, an ant, and a bee. Ovipositor taste function has been supported for some species of flies, lepidopterans, hymenopterans, orthopterans, and odonates. Taste by wings has been much less studied, but has been documented in a few fly species. Taste remains unstudied for any species or any body parts of Archaeognatha, Dermaptera, Mantodea, Mecoptera, Phasmatodea, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Phthiraptera, Psocoptera, Siphonaptera, as well as Raphidioptera, Strepsiptera, Embioptera, Notoptera, and Zoraptera. Across holometabolous insects, larvae have not often been examined, the exception being some species of lepidopterans, flies, and beetles. Taste studies of antenna and legs are uncommon for even lepidopteran and beetle larvae.
{"title":"Gustation Across the Class Insecta: Body Locations","authors":"B. King, P. Gunathunga","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saac027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac027","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This review summarizes which body parts have taste function in which insect taxa. Evidence of taste by mouthparts, antennae, and tarsi is widespread. Mouthparts that commonly have taste function are the labium, including the labella and labial palps, the maxillae, including the galeae and maxillary palps, the inner surface of the labrum or clypeolabrum of chewers, and inside the precibarium/cibarium of hemipterans, which have piercing-sucking mouthparts. Tasting with mandibles has not been found, and tasting with the hypopharynx is seldom reported. Use of the antennae appears uncommon among fly species, but common among species of lepidopterans, hymenopterans, beetles, and bugs. Although tasting with legs, especially tarsi, is reported mostly for fly and lepidopteran species, there is also evidence of it for multiple species of beetles, grasshoppers, and hemipterans, and one species of a roach, an ant, and a bee. Ovipositor taste function has been supported for some species of flies, lepidopterans, hymenopterans, orthopterans, and odonates. Taste by wings has been much less studied, but has been documented in a few fly species. Taste remains unstudied for any species or any body parts of Archaeognatha, Dermaptera, Mantodea, Mecoptera, Phasmatodea, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Phthiraptera, Psocoptera, Siphonaptera, as well as Raphidioptera, Strepsiptera, Embioptera, Notoptera, and Zoraptera. Across holometabolous insects, larvae have not often been examined, the exception being some species of lepidopterans, flies, and beetles. Taste studies of antenna and legs are uncommon for even lepidopteran and beetle larvae.","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"76 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47064968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Haddad, Dave Clarke, Soo-Hyun Jeong, R. Mitchell, D. Mckenna
Abstract Insect antennae are crucial sensory organs that house numerous sensilla with receptors for perceiving a wide variety of cues dominating their world. Historically, inconsistent terminology and criteria have been used to classify antennal sensilla, which has greatly impeded the comparison of data even across closely related species. Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) are no exception to this quandary, and despite their prominent antennae, few studies have investigated their antennal morphology and ultrastructure, and none have compared sensillar diversity and variation among cerambycids. Existing studies of longhorn beetle antennal sensilla include only 29 species in five of the eight cerambycid subfamilies and include misidentified sensilla types and conflicting terminology. As such, it is very difficult to conduct comparative morphological studies of antennal sensilla in longhorn beetles and challenging to understand inter- and intra-specific variation in the sensory systems of these beetles.To facilitate future comparative studies, we reviewed all accessible published papers that have used scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) to investigate antennal sensilla in cerambycids, and present a first attempt at standardizing the classification of their documented sensilla types and subtypes. Specifically, we discuss seven major types of antennal sensilla (Boöhm bristles, sensilla chaetica, chemosensory hairs, sensilla basiconica, dome shaped organs, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica). We also imaged the antennae of relevant species of longhorn beetles using SEM and included images exemplifying as many of the sensilla types and subtypes as possible.
{"title":"Antennal Sensilla in Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)","authors":"S. Haddad, Dave Clarke, Soo-Hyun Jeong, R. Mitchell, D. Mckenna","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saac026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac026","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Insect antennae are crucial sensory organs that house numerous sensilla with receptors for perceiving a wide variety of cues dominating their world. Historically, inconsistent terminology and criteria have been used to classify antennal sensilla, which has greatly impeded the comparison of data even across closely related species. Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) are no exception to this quandary, and despite their prominent antennae, few studies have investigated their antennal morphology and ultrastructure, and none have compared sensillar diversity and variation among cerambycids. Existing studies of longhorn beetle antennal sensilla include only 29 species in five of the eight cerambycid subfamilies and include misidentified sensilla types and conflicting terminology. As such, it is very difficult to conduct comparative morphological studies of antennal sensilla in longhorn beetles and challenging to understand inter- and intra-specific variation in the sensory systems of these beetles.To facilitate future comparative studies, we reviewed all accessible published papers that have used scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) to investigate antennal sensilla in cerambycids, and present a first attempt at standardizing the classification of their documented sensilla types and subtypes. Specifically, we discuss seven major types of antennal sensilla (Boöhm bristles, sensilla chaetica, chemosensory hairs, sensilla basiconica, dome shaped organs, sensilla coeloconica, and sensilla auricillica). We also imaged the antennae of relevant species of longhorn beetles using SEM and included images exemplifying as many of the sensilla types and subtypes as possible.","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"83 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41985641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On passing the editorial baton at Annals","authors":"L. Hurd","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saac028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"116 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49365573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：